View allAll Photos Tagged forms
Plastic forming products coming down the assembly line.
Image released under Creative Commons. Use on any site you wish - please attribute to IndustrialTraffic.com
För veckans #Fotosondag med temat Form.
Handhållen med:
- Vivitar 80-200mm f4
- Sigma Tele-Macro 2X - 1:1
- Macro Extension Tube
This was taken at a sculpture garden in a estate called Grande Provence, Franschhoek, Cape Town, South Africa.
African Ambassadors & Diaspora Interactive Form AAIF Awards Gala Dinner United Nations buildings International Maritime Organization HQ IMO London. Photo Opportunity Portraits with Chereena Miller Positive Runway Global Catwalk
The forms are in place and concrete is poured at the brand-new CCS-agriKomp on-farm reference plant in Millbrook, Ontario.
More info here:
info.octaform.com/blog/bid/38924/Canadians-Bring-German-B...
Plate-forme supérieure du monument aux 2 plates-formes des Abattois, avec sa niche. Vue de face. Photo Jacques RENOUX - Dijon
Parametric design - the size of the opening transform while different parameters are input... This research can be used in Facade design...
titre : Deux Grandes Formes
auteur : Henry Moore (Anglais, 1898 - 1986)
technique : sculpture en bronze
dimensions : L : 610cm
date de création : 1966
lieu de conservation : Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew , Londres
Commentaires : La composition est très élégante et sensuelle comme une danse. La sculpture provoque une lecture plus proche et attentive du public, à découvrir doucement ses angles et contempler le paysage à travers elle. L'artiste préférait ses oeuvres exposées en dehors des murs et il avait raison, puisqu'elles composent le paysage.
photo :
www.kew.org/henry-moore/explore/slideshows/sculpture13/sc...
Art in the Age of Now Exhibition Fulham Town Hall London with Alesha Jamaican Fashion Model Out on the Town. Artwork: What's the highest form of Knowledge? The Regal's Demons. Prince Phillip 10th June 1901 - 9th April 2021 200 Million for his tribute paid for by the people.
@unvrslnmd is one of the great artists taking part in #artintheageofnow @fulhamtownhall
Hola amigos queremos mostrarte una forma fácil y rápida de preparar una mega mazorcada familiar, en donde podrás disfrutar todos los sabores de la mazorca, las carnes, salsas y maduritos los cuales complementar esta rica y deliciosa receta! Ven y visitanos:
www.loidealparatodos.com/receta-como-preparar-mazorcada-c...
Formed in 2002 by Cliff Dolliver and Mick Lynch, Dowtcha are Cork’s puppet specialists. They develop and present original, high-quality puppet shows, visual theatre and workshops. The company also produce visual spectacle and street theatre. They have taken part in the parade many times since their first appearance in 2003.
"Anything above form, called the Tao.
Anything below form, called things "
"Book of Changes"
Models: Bob & Bertran
Place: My Studio
Date: October 6, 2009
A tourist reviews the giant video screen prior to the start of the Chinese New Year Race Day at Sha Tin Racecourse, Hong Kong. An estimated 80,000 capactiy spectators were expected to attend the race meeting.
エキノプシス「桃花短毛丸」
Echinopsis eyriesii (Turpin) Zucc., 1839
(Pink Flower Form)
This name is accepted. 02/10, 2021.
--------------------------------------------------------
Synonyms:
Cereus eyriesii Pfeiff., 1837
Cereus jasmineus Pfeiff., 1837
Cereus multiplex Pfeiff., 1837
Cereus schelhasii Pfeiff., 1835
Cereus turbinatus Pfeiff., 1835
Echinocactus boutillieri Parm. ex Pfeiff., 1835
Echinocactus eyriesii Turpin, 1830
Echinocactus eyriesii var. glaucus Lindl., 1838
Echinocactus turbinatus Pfeiff., 1835
Echinonyctanthus eyriesii Lem., 1839
Echinonyctanthus turbinatus Lem., 1839
Echinopsis eyriesii (Turpin) Zucc., 1839
Echinopsis eyriesii var. grandiflora Rud.Mey., 1911
Echinopsis eyriesii var. pudantii P.Fourn., 1935
Echinopsis eyriesii var. schelhasii (Pfeiff. et Otto) P.Fourn., 1935
Echinopsis gemmata (Otto ex Pfeiff.) K.Schum., 1890
Echinopsis gemmata var. schelhasii (Pfeiff. et Otto) Schelle, 1907
Echinopsis multiplex (Pfeiff.) Zucc., 1839
Echinopsis oxygona (Link) Zucc. ex Pfeiff. et Otto forma grandiflora (Rud.Mey.) J.Ullmann, 1999
Echinopsis pudantii Pfersdorf ex Roth, 1900
Echinopsis schelhasii Pfeiff. et Otto, 1838
Echinopsis turbinata Pfeiff. et Otto, 1838
Echinopsis × wilkensii (Linke) K.Schum., 1897
Rebutia multiplex (Pfeiff.) Roeder, 1938
--------------------------------------------------------
Nikon D7100
Schneider-Kreuznach Apo-Componon HM 90mm F4.5
Enlarging Lens M39 Screw Mount
Schneider-Kreuznach UNIFOC 58 Helical Focus Mount
Sometimes, parties start at home, but this party was only for two. Part of my intimate lives project I explored intimacy with friends.
[syn. Caesalpinia kavaiensis]
Uhiuhi
Fabaceae
Endemic to the Hawaiian Islands
IUCN: Critically Endangered
Oʻahu (Cultivated), Oʻahu form
Uhiuhi are such rare dry forest trees that they should be grown more for cultural importance and as a beautiful landscape tree.
Tree
www.flickr.com/photos/dweickhoff/4822015095/in/photolist-...
Flowers
www.flickr.com/photos/dweickhoff/4822011505/in/photolist-...
Here's a propagation technique that I've found to be very effective for uhiuhi and other native Hawaiian plants with weak root systems. Anyone that has tried to plant out uhiuhi from pot to a final site, knows that much of the soil falls away when you remove the plant, leaving you with near bare roots.
So, first sow, rather densely, an annual grass species in a one or two gallon black pot. Allow the annual grass die back. You can also cease watering when you feel it has a root mass. Sow one uhiuhi seed, in center if possible. The dense grass root mass is the support needed for uhiuhi roots and to be planted to a site in tact. The soil does not fall away or disturb the uhiuhi roots when removed. Another similar method that I've recently read about is to plant uhiuhi in a pot with an already established native plant with a root mass. Since uhiuhi are not suited for pot culture because roots tend to coil, plant out as a young sapling to a sunny site.
I've done this over the past few years with several uhiuhi and it works every time. A Caution: Do not over water as the root mass which tends to retains the water.
Early Hawaiians used the hard wood for digging tools (ʻōʻō), war clubs and daggers, prepping boards for kapa (lāʻau kahi wauke), kapa beaters, kalo (taro) cutters, spears for heʻe (octopus), fishing implements (lāʻau melomelo or lāʻau mākālei), and shark hooks (makau manō) fitted with bone points.
This strong wood was also used in house (hale) construction for posts, rafters and purlins.
The bark and young leaves pounded with other plants were pounded, squeezed and liquid taken to purify the blood.
Etymology
The current generic name is Mezoneuron is from the Greek meizon, greater, and neuron, nerve, referring to the winged pod.
The specific epithet kavaiense is in reference to the island of Kauaʻi.
A 3D printed jewellery piece created with a Formlabs Form 2 SLA 3D printer. Right is the printed Castable Wax Resin part, ready to be fired, the other is a finished gold cast piece.
Free for use under Creative Commons license. If you use this image, please link to "formlabs.com/3d-printers/" in your attribution.
Rapid strata formation in soft sand (field evidence).
Photo of strata formation in soft sand on a beach, created by tidal action of the sea.
Formed in a single, high tidal event. Stunning evidence which displays multiple strata/layers.
Why this is so important ....
It has long been assumed, ever since the 17th century, that layers/strata observed in sedimentary rocks were built up gradually, layer upon layer, over many years. It certainly seemed logical at the time, from just looking at rocks, that lower layers would always be older than the layers above them, i.e. that lower layers were always laid down first followed, in time, by successive layers on top.
This was assumed to be true and became known as the superposition principle.
It was also assumed that a layer comprising a different material from a previous layer, represented a change in environmental conditions/factors.
These changes in composition of layers or strata were considered to represent different, geological eras on a global scale, spanning millions of years. This formed the basis for the Geologic Column, which is used to date rocks and also fossils. The evolutionary, 'fossil record' was based on the vast ages and assumed geological eras of the Geologic Column.
There was also circular reasoning applied with the assumed age of 'index' fossils (based on evolutionary beliefs & preconceptions) used to date strata in the Geologic Column. Dating strata from the assumed age of (index) fossils is known as Biostratigraphy.
We now know that, although these assumptions seemed logical, they are not supported by the evidence.
At the time, the mechanics of stratification were not properly known or studied.
An additional factor was that this assumed superposition and uniformitarian model became essential, with the wide acceptance of Darwinism, for the long ages required for progressive microbes-to-human evolution. There was no incentive to question or challenge the superposition, uniformitarian model, because the presumed, fossil 'record' had become dependant on it, and any change in the accepted model would present devastating implications for Darwinism.
This had the unfortunate effect of linking the study of geology so closely to Darwinism, that any study independent of Darwinian considerations was effectively stymied. This link of geology with Darwinian preconceptions is known as biostratigraphy.
Some other field evidence, in various situations, can be observed here: www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
and also in the links to stunning, experimental evidence, carried out by sedimentologists, given later.
_______________________________________________
GEOLOGIC PRINCIPLES (established by Nicholas Steno in the 17th Century):
What Nicolas Steno believed about strata formation is the basis of the principle of Superposition and the principle of Original Horizontality.
dictionary.sensagent.com/Law_of_superposition/en-en/
“Assuming that all rocks and minerals had once been fluid, Nicolas Steno reasoned that rock strata were formed when particles in a fluid such as water fell to the bottom. This process would leave horizontal layers. Thus Steno's principle of original horizontality states that rock layers form in the horizontal position, and any deviations from this horizontal position are due to the rocks being disturbed later.”)
BEDDING PLANES.
'Bedding plane' describes the surface in between each stratum which are formed during sediment deposition.
science.jrank.org/pages/6533/Strata.html
“Strata form during sediment deposition, that is, the laying down of sediment. Meanwhile, if a change in current speed or sediment grain size occurs or perhaps the sediment supply is cut off, a bedding plane forms. Bedding planes are surfaces that separate one stratum from another. Bedding planes can also form when the upper part of a sediment layer is eroded away before the next episode of deposition. Strata separated by a bedding plane may have different grain sizes, grain compositions, or colours. Sometimes these other traits are better indicators of stratification as bedding planes may be very subtle.”
______________________________________________
Several catastrophic events, flash floods, volcanic eruptions etc. have forced Darwinian, influenced geologists to admit to rapid stratification in some instances. However they claim it is a rare phenomenon, which they have known about for many years, and which does nothing to invalidate the Geologic Column, the fossil record, evolutionary timescale, or any of the old assumptions regarding strata formation, sedimentation and the superposition principle. They fail to face up to the fact that rapid stratification is not an extraordinary phenonemon, but rather the prevailing and normal mechanism of sedimentary deposition whenever and wherever there is moving, sediment-laden water. The experimental evidence demonstrates the mechanism and a mass of field evidence in normal (non-catastrophic) conditions shows it is a normal everyday occurrence.
It is clear from the experimental evidence that the usual process of stratification is - that strata are not formed by horizontal layers being laid on top of each other in succession, as was assumed. But by sediment being sorted in the flowing water and laid down diagonally in the direction of flow. See diagram:
www.flickr.com/photos/truth-in-science/39821536092/in/dat...
The field evidence (in the image) presented here - of rapid, simultaneous stratification refutes the Superposition Principle and the Principle of Lateral Continuity.
We now know, the Superposition Principle only applies on a rare occasion where sedimentary deposits are laid down in still water.
Superposition is required for the long evolutionary timescale, but the evidence shows it is not the general rule, as was once believed. Most sediment is laid down in moving water, where particle segregation is the general rule, resulting in the simultaneous deposition of strata/layers as shown in the photo.
See many other examples of rapid stratification (with geological features): www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
Rapid, simultaneous formation of layers/strata, through particle segregation in moving water, is so easily created it has even been described by sedimentologists (working on flume experiments) as a law ...
"Upon filling the tank with water and pouring in sediments, we immediately saw what was to become the rule: The sediments sorted themselves out in very clear layers. This became so common that by the end of two weeks, we jokingly referred to Andrew's law as "It's difficult not to make layers," and Clark's law as "It's easy to make layers." Later on, I proposed the "law" that liquefaction destroys layers, as much to my surprise as that was." Ian Juby, www.ianjuby.org/sedimentation/
The example in the photo is the result of normal, everyday tidal action in a single incident. Where the water current or movement is more turbulent, violent, or catastrophic, great depths (many metres) of stratified sediment can be laid down in a short time. Certainly not the many millions of years assumed by evolutionists.
The composition of strata formed in any deposition event. is related to whatever materials are in the sediment mix, not to any particular timescale. Whatever is in the mix will be automatically sorted into strata/layers. It could be sand, or other material added from mud slides, erosion of chalk deposits, coastal erosion, volcanic ash etc. Any organic material (potential fossils), alive or dead, engulfed by, or swept into, a turbulent sediment mix, will also be sorted and buried within the rapidly, forming layers.
See many other examples of rapid stratification with geological features: www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
Stratified, soft sand deposit. demonstrates the rapid, stratification principle.
Important, field evidence which supports the work of the eminent, sedimentologist Dr Guy Berthault MIAS - Member of the International Association of Sedimentologists.
(Dr Berthault's experiments (www.sedimentology.fr/)
And also the experimental work of Dr M.E. Clark (Professor Emeritus, U of Illinois @ Urbana), Andrew Rodenbeck and Dr. Henry Voss, (www.ianjuby.org/sedimentation/)
Location: Sandown, Isle of Wight. Formed 16/01/2018 This field evidence demonstrates that multiple strata in sedimentary deposits do not need millions of years to form and can be formed rapidly. This natural example confirms the principle demonstrated by the sedimentation experiments carried out by Dr Guy Berthault and other sedimentologists. It calls into question the standard, multi-million year dating of sedimentary rocks, and the dating of fossils by depth of burial or position in the strata.
Mulltiple strata/layers are evident in this example.
Dr Berthault's experiments (www.sedimentology.fr/) and other experiments (www.ianjuby.org/sedimentation/) and field studies of floods and volcanic action show that, rather than being formed by gradual, slow deposition of sucessive layers superimposed upon previous layers, with the strata or layers representing a particular timescale, particle segregation in moving water or airborne particles can form strata or layers very quickly, frequently, in a single event.
And, most importantly, lower strata are not older than upper strata, they are the same age, having been created in the same sedimentary episode.
Such field studies confirm experiments which have shown that there is no longer any reason to conclude that strata/layers in sedimentary rocks relate to different geological eras and/or a multi-million year timescale. www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PVnBaqqQw8&feature=share&.... they also show that the relative position of fossils in rocks is not indicative of an order of evolutionary succession. Obviously, the uniformitarian principle, on which the geologic column is based, can no longer be considered valid. And the multi-million, year dating of sedimentary rocks and fossils needs to be reassessed. Rapid deposition of stratified sediments also explains the enigma of polystrate fossils, i.e. large fossils that intersect several strata. In some cases, tree trunk fossils are found which intersect the strata of sedimentary rock up to forty feet in depth. upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Lycopsi... They must have been buried in stratified sediment in a short time (certainly not millions, thousands, or even hundreds of years), or they would have rotted away. youtu.be/vnzHU9VsliQ
In fact, the vast majority of fossils are found in good, intact condition, which is testament to their rapid burial. You don't get good fossils from gradual burial, because they would be damaged or destroyed by decay, predation or erosion. The existence of so many fossils in sedimentary rock on a global scale is stunning evidence for the rapid depostion of sedimentary rock as the general rule. It is obvious that all rock containing good intact fossils was formed from sediment laid down in a very short time, not millions, or even thousands of years.
See set of photos of other examples of rapid stratification: www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
Carbon dating of coal should not be possible if it is millions of years old, yet significant amounts of Carbon 14 have been detected in coal and other fossil material, which indicates that it is less than 50,000 years old. www.ldolphin.org/sewell/c14dating.html
www.grisda.org/origins/51006.htm
Evolutionists confidently cite multi-million year ages for rocks and fossils, but what most people don't realise is that no one actually knows the age of sedimentary rocks or the fossils found within them. So how are evolutionists so sure of the ages they so confidently quote? The astonishing thing is they aren't. Sedimentary rocks cannot be dated by radiometric methods*, and fossils can only be dated to less than 50,000 years with Carbon 14 dating. The method evolutionists use is based entirely on assumptions. Unbelievably, fossils are dated by the assumed age of rocks, and rocks are dated by the assumed age of fossils, that's right ... it is known as circular reasoning.
* Regarding the radiometric dating of igneous rocks, which is claimed to be relevant to the dating of sedimentary rocks, in an occasional instance there is an igneous intrusion associated with a sedimentary deposit -
Prof. Aubouin says in his Précis de Géologie: "Each radioactive element disintegrates in a characteristic and constant manner, which depends neither on the physical state (no variation with pressure or temperature or any other external constraint) nor on the chemical state (identical for an oxide or a phosphate)."
"Rocks form when magma crystallizes. Crystallisation depends on pressure and temperature, from which radioactivity is independent. So, there is no relationship between radioactivity and crystallisation.
Consequently, radioactivity doesn't date the formation of rocks. Moreover, daughter elements contained in rocks result mainly from radioactivity in magma where gravity separates the heavier parent element, from the lighter daughter element. Thus radiometric dating has no chronological signification." Dr. Guy Berthault www.sciencevsevolution.org/Berthault.htm
Visit the fossil museum:
www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157641367196613/
Just how good are peer reviews of scientific papers?
www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full
www.examiner.com/article/want-to-publish-science-paper-ju...
The neo-Darwinian idea that the human genome consists entirely of an accumulation of billions of mutations is, quite obviously, completely bonkers. Nevertheless, it is compulsorily taught in schools and universities as 'science'.