View allAll Photos Tagged Comparison

Iplehouse faceup on left and Elin's new faceup on right.

 

I just completed my second faceup yesterday. When my much-anticipated Iplehouse Elin arrived, I was very disappointed with her company faceup. It was so pale and washed-out she reminded me of a little ghost. I really didn't feel the faceup my doll came with looked at all like the one shown on the Iplehouse website.

 

So I decided to wipe the faceup and got my painting materials out for the second time. I am much happier now with my Elin - she is a lot closer to how I imagined her rosy-cheeked and with a shy expression.

 

Comparison shot of the Psychic Paper and the favor felt version.

MNF Chloe Fairyland, Ashley leekeworld, Bella Doll Chateau

From Left to Right: Roma Red, Merlot Red, and Colonial Red

Haven't been doing this this year, but here you go.

Participants:

 

Arius: Nobilitydoll Raon NS + Luts Jr Delf NS + unknown jointed hands: stands about 61,5cm tall

Osamu: Ariadoll Van NS + DollnDoll King NS + Luts NS hands : stands about 57-58cm tall

Radul: SRDoll Zeev WS + Impldoll Model NSY : stands about 57-58cm tall

Marcel: 55HD-M01 head+ Obitsu 55cm White: stands about 58,5cm tall

Yazhu: Ios Co + 50 A WS: stands about 50cm tall

Thursday: DIM Laia + Soulkids boy NS: stands about 48cm tall

I apologize for the light in my room and the overal messy setting. I could barely fit them all together for this

 

Raon and Van are 8-9″ heads, while the Obitsu, Co and Laia are closer to 7-8″

Stagecoach Hybrid vs First Barbie Buses...

Simple side by side comparison between having the polarizer off, and on. I think it was a good purchase.

Comparison: 77-79 Hunter St. Newcastle:

 

1896, Butchers / Boot Shop (photo by Ralph Snowball)

 

1986, Brown Derby Restaurant, prev. Cafe (photo by Percy Sternbeck, Coalfields Heritage Group Flickr page).

100mm Lens Comparison, Border

 

Sample pictures of this group of lenses. The same chart for the center, where is also a description of the set-up.

 

The black dot in the white rectangle displays the size and the position of the crop.

The focusing was done seperately for the border, so you have no conclusion regarding the field of curvature.

 

Here, in my opinion, the Pentax macro is the best lens. It suffers from purple fringing, but sharpness and contrast are very good from f2.8 on. The Sigma is also sharp from f5.6 on, but the images remain somewhat pale. The Pentax zoom lens has no chance here: low contrast and low sharpness, best performance not until f16. The Fujinon is fine at the border too, good performance from f8 on, but it can't reach the performance of the macro lenses.

The Pancolar has a good sharpness at f1.8, compared with some 50 mm lenses it is even remarkable good. Stopping down increases the contrast, but the sharpness is not improved very well. So the image quality is not sensational high, but has a constant level over the whole frame. The Jupiter is clearly the worst lens here, I would call it "rather soft", but eventually a welcome feature to keep the background blurred in a portrait shot.

Due to the limitation of the 3/3-design the Hanimex and the Steinheil are in trouble here, but the Hanimex is fighting bravely.

Pluto:

Photo collage to show the area of the video clip:

photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/archive/PIA14457_05-26-16_Strip...

Original image Credit: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI

 

Earth:

Image from Goolge Earth:

earth.google.com/web/@-82.43329039,111.35071978,-564.0445...

Bratz Kids and Angel Pullip.

Leek v Green Onion! Who wins?!

I tried to capture the shot from same angle but failed. See how many changes do you notice in 31 years

Please refer to comments under first image in this set.

"Mighty Mike" size comparison

Newport Aquarium

All we need now is a bunch of different comparisons of comparison websites and we can compare them too.

Foreground: Whippet

Back: Osprey

 

An attempt at a comparison shot between my two aircraft.

Temptation Vanessa = Japan Skintone

Night Warrior Vanessa = Japan

Shaken Not Shirred Vanessa = FR White (Caucasian)

A side-view comparison of the original WIP design in the black one and the new WIP design in the yellow one. (See older comparison shot.)

Most of the film in my film cache is from when I was shooting regularly before 2009. As a result, it's almost all expired. This is a comparison of the first two rolls of C-41 I developed myself at home. The top roll is some old Kodak 100 UC that expired sometime before 2010, and the bottom roll is a fresh roll of Ektar 100 that expires in 2017. They were shot no more than 15 minutes apart in the same conditions and developed together in the same can.

 

These two came out rather close to each other; other expired rolls I've shot have been far, far worse with the blue cast. It seems expired C-41 comes out better if processed by hand. I'm going to experiment with warming filters to try and mitigate the worst of it.

Made with Leica R8 and Modul-r digital back. From Shutterbug 2005.

***View Large***

 

Just got a new (used) Vivitar 2x Teleconverter. It is the 7 element AF-D for Nikon mount. I was asked how it performs and took a couple shots for comparison. The camera used was a Nikon D3100 and the lens was a Tamron SP 70-300.

 

Details of each crop:

1. Tamron SP 70-300 @ 300mm 100% crop

 

2. Tamron SP 70-300 @ 300mm w/ 2x TC 100% crop

 

3. Image # 1 detail @ 200% crop

 

4. Image # 2 detail @ 100% crop

 

5. Image # 1 detail @ 400% crop

 

6. Image # 2 detail @ 200% crop

 

***Camera settings:

Image # 1: 1/400 | f/5.6 | ISO 100

Image # 2: 1/125 | f/5.6 | ISO 160

 

Other than cropping, the images are unedited jpg outputs directly from the camera. The photos were taken on different days and this may have affected the white balance and colors slightly. Also, the camera was hand held and I would expect a better result with a tripod.

Photos (NOT handheld shots) for comparison of the Nikkor 80-400 VR to the 70-200VR with and without the TC-20EII teleconverter. I have uploaded original full size photos for various focal lengths and apertures of each lens, along with two different crops of each photo.

 

All photos are unedited other than cropping.

 

The lens, focal length, and aperture data for each photo are given in the filenames.

 

All photos were taken with a Nikon D200 sitting on a stable piano bench approximately 8 feet from the feather, which was taped to a wall and sticking out horizontally into the air at about the same level as the camera, and roughly perpendicular to the camera's line of sight.

 

Auto focus was used to focus on the middle of the narrow blue stripe just to the left (in these photos) of the dark eye.

 

ISO was 100.

 

VR was off.

 

Mirror lockup and the default mirror lockup timed shutter release were used to prevent camera shake.

 

Illumination was from an SB800 flash mounted on the camera in TTL mode.

 

Spot metering was used.

Photos (NOT handheld shots) for comparison of the Nikkor 80-400 VR to the 70-200VR with and without the TC-20EII teleconverter. I have uploaded original full size photos for various focal lengths and apertures of each lens, along with two different crops of each photo.

 

All photos are unedited other than cropping.

 

The lens, focal length, and aperture data for each photo are given in the filenames.

 

All photos were taken with a Nikon D200 sitting on a stable piano bench approximately 8 feet from the feather, which was taped to a wall and sticking out horizontally into the air at about the same level as the camera, and roughly perpendicular to the camera's line of sight.

 

Auto focus was used to focus on the middle of the narrow blue stripe just to the left (in these photos) of the dark eye.

 

ISO was 100.

 

VR was off.

 

Mirror lockup and the default mirror lockup timed shutter release were used to prevent camera shake.

 

Illumination was from an SB800 flash mounted on the camera in TTL mode.

 

Spot metering was used.

I used portrait mode for this one and I like how the color turned out in the background. I wish it would have looked more like a leaf. 18/20

A rib of beef and my (large) hand for a size comparison.

Board walk...Chesil beach...

still playing with new old lens

Best Fat Burners Diary News -> Adiphene and Phen375 are competing products that promise the same results and action but deliver in different ways and through different ingredients. Face to face, which one is more effective? Phen375 vs Adiphene Major Ingredients Phen375 : Its six main components are popular chemical compounds that mostly aim to increase the biological metabolic function. 1,3-Dimethypentylamine Hydrochloride – It increases necessary enzymes to boost energy and enhance metabolic function. 1,3,7-Trimethylxanthine – It effectively converts body fat to energy fuel. Capsaicin – Currently a favorite compound for many weight loss supplements, it increases thermogenesis (internal body temperature) leading to faster metabolism. Also, it reduces appetite and craving. LongJack Tongkat Ali – A known aphrodisiac, it increases blood circulation, increasing temperature and metabolism in the... Read the rest of this entry Original Source Post: Phen375 vs Adiphene: An In-depth Comparison feedproxy.google.com/~r/BestFatBurnersDiary/~3/byNiGdUzmJc/

Photos taken from SWFEC showing comparison photos of E10 and E11 on January 10 & 11, 2018. Photos property of SWFEC.

Left to right: Desert Spiny Lizard (?), Acorn Woodpecker, White-winged Dove.

1 2 ••• 57 58 60 62 63 ••• 79 80