Sponsored images from 
View allAll Photos Tagged Comparison
100mm Lens Comparison, Border
Sample pictures of this group of lenses. The same chart for the center, where is also a description of the set-up.
The black dot in the white rectangle displays the size and the position of the crop.
The focusing was done seperately for the border, so you have no conclusion regarding the field of curvature.
Here, in my opinion, the Pentax macro is the best lens. It suffers from purple fringing, but sharpness and contrast are very good from f2.8 on. The Sigma is also sharp from f5.6 on, but the images remain somewhat pale. The Pentax zoom lens has no chance here: low contrast and low sharpness, best performance not until f16. The Fujinon is fine at the border too, good performance from f8 on, but it can't reach the performance of the macro lenses.
The Pancolar has a good sharpness at f1.8, compared with some 50 mm lenses it is even remarkable good. Stopping down increases the contrast, but the sharpness is not improved very well. So the image quality is not sensational high, but has a constant level over the whole frame. The Jupiter is clearly the worst lens here, I would call it "rather soft", but eventually a welcome feature to keep the background blurred in a portrait shot.
Due to the limitation of the 3/3-design the Hanimex and the Steinheil are in trouble here, but the Hanimex is fighting bravely.
I tried to capture the shot from same angle but failed. See how many changes do you notice in 31 years
Comparison photo of Jessie and her pal Kaitlyn on Halloween 2004(left) and 2005(right).
Sadly enough, Kaitlyn's family is moving to South Carolina mid next year, so this is Kaitlyn and Jessie's last Halloween together.
A side-view comparison of the original WIP design in the black one and the new WIP design in the yellow one. (See older comparison shot.)
Most of the film in my film cache is from when I was shooting regularly before 2009. As a result, it's almost all expired. This is a comparison of the first two rolls of C-41 I developed myself at home. The top roll is some old Kodak 100 UC that expired sometime before 2010, and the bottom roll is a fresh roll of Ektar 100 that expires in 2017. They were shot no more than 15 minutes apart in the same conditions and developed together in the same can.
These two came out rather close to each other; other expired rolls I've shot have been far, far worse with the blue cast. It seems expired C-41 comes out better if processed by hand. I'm going to experiment with warming filters to try and mitigate the worst of it.
Of the new Nikon Nikkor AF-S 50mm f/1.4 G at various apertures.
The result is much better than with the Nikon Nikkor AF 85mm f/1.8 D
See review at www.cameralabs.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10926
All we need now is a bunch of different comparisons of comparison websites and we can compare them too.
This is the kit lens that came with the 80D camera. I just put this on shutter priority and aimed and shot (hand held no flash) for comparison with the Apple iPhone 8 with accessory zoom lens.
comparing black and white and adjustable threshold
www.google.com/support/forum/p/picnik/thread?tid=32771b3b...
Photos (NOT handheld shots) for comparison of the Nikkor 80-400 VR to the 70-200VR with and without the TC-20EII teleconverter. I have uploaded original full size photos for various focal lengths and apertures of each lens, along with two different crops of each photo.
All photos are unedited other than cropping.
The lens, focal length, and aperture data for each photo are given in the filenames.
All photos were taken with a Nikon D200 sitting on a stable piano bench approximately 8 feet from the feather, which was taped to a wall and sticking out horizontally into the air at about the same level as the camera, and roughly perpendicular to the camera's line of sight.
Auto focus was used to focus on the middle of the narrow blue stripe just to the left (in these photos) of the dark eye.
ISO was 100.
VR was off.
Mirror lockup and the default mirror lockup timed shutter release were used to prevent camera shake.
Illumination was from an SB800 flash mounted on the camera in TTL mode.
Spot metering was used.
I used portrait mode for this one and I like how the color turned out in the background. I wish it would have looked more like a leaf. 18/20
Pluto:
Photo collage to show the area of the video clip:
photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/archive/PIA14457_05-26-16_Strip...
Original image Credit: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI
Earth:
Image from Goolge Earth:
earth.google.com/web/@-82.43329039,111.35071978,-564.0445...
Best Fat Burners Diary News -> Adiphene and Phen375 are competing products that promise the same results and action but deliver in different ways and through different ingredients. Face to face, which one is more effective? Phen375 vs Adiphene Major Ingredients Phen375 : Its six main components are popular chemical compounds that mostly aim to increase the biological metabolic function. 1,3-Dimethypentylamine Hydrochloride – It increases necessary enzymes to boost energy and enhance metabolic function. 1,3,7-Trimethylxanthine – It effectively converts body fat to energy fuel. Capsaicin – Currently a favorite compound for many weight loss supplements, it increases thermogenesis (internal body temperature) leading to faster metabolism. Also, it reduces appetite and craving. LongJack Tongkat Ali – A known aphrodisiac, it increases blood circulation, increasing temperature and metabolism in the... Read the rest of this entry Original Source Post: Phen375 vs Adiphene: An In-depth Comparison feedproxy.google.com/~r/BestFatBurnersDiary/~3/byNiGdUzmJc/
A closer look at the trunks from the materials comparison video.
The materials viewer is coming very soon so with that in mind I will be providing 'materials ready' versions of the FATEwear releases between now and materials viewer launch. Here you can see a comparison between 6 objects that are the same mesh.
The top row is untextured (no diffuse), the bottom row is textured. The first column has no material shaders applied, this is how things currently look in Second Life. The second column uses a combination of normal mapping and specular maps to acheive a more realistic sheen look to the trunks, the third column is a 'wet' look, since these are swimming trunks you might want them to look wet. All three versions will be provided in the one package.
Exciting times ahead!
Iplehouse EID head on Bimong Narin65 body (badly edited head color as the head is NS and the body is tan). I believe that this is a viable hybrid option if someone is looking for a slimmer/shorter body for an EID head.
Comparison of $1300 Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8 to the brand-new $450 Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 at full wide-angle. Gotta view it at full size.