View allAll Photos Tagged Comparison
I tried to capture the shot from same angle but failed. See how many changes do you notice in 31 years
From left to right:
Top row:
Peach Normal(volks normal), Pastel pink and Cream white
Second row:
FL's natural skin, FL's pink skin(yellowed!), FL's beauty white
I went looking for a summary of available autoguiders and came up short. If I
missed it, let me know. One has to really dig to get the important
features/specs/reviews in mind.
I started a spreadsheet listing (with wrong/missing items), but it's a
start.
As I update it, a live spreadsheet might be at:
spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AkGMXYTYLeUedGMxNzFYVWlz...
This started last week after seeing confusing and variable reviews of commercial
autoguiders, none seemed to be designed right. Something wrong with each.
I decided to make my own, very cheap, click on "autoguiders" set, to the right.
.
.
.
Screen11-22_58
Comparison photo of Jessie and her pal Kaitlyn on Halloween 2004(left) and 2005(right).
Sadly enough, Kaitlyn's family is moving to South Carolina mid next year, so this is Kaitlyn and Jessie's last Halloween together.
Temptation Vanessa = Japan Skintone
Night Warrior Vanessa = Japan
Shaken Not Shirred Vanessa = FR White (Caucasian)
Resinsoul White Skin 2013 with Impldoll Normal Pink Skin 2015
I am a big fans of veins~ <3 love both of hands
A side-view comparison of the original WIP design in the black one and the new WIP design in the yellow one. (See older comparison shot.)
Most of the film in my film cache is from when I was shooting regularly before 2009. As a result, it's almost all expired. This is a comparison of the first two rolls of C-41 I developed myself at home. The top roll is some old Kodak 100 UC that expired sometime before 2010, and the bottom roll is a fresh roll of Ektar 100 that expires in 2017. They were shot no more than 15 minutes apart in the same conditions and developed together in the same can.
These two came out rather close to each other; other expired rolls I've shot have been far, far worse with the blue cast. It seems expired C-41 comes out better if processed by hand. I'm going to experiment with warming filters to try and mitigate the worst of it.
This is the kit lens that came with the 80D camera. I just put this on shutter priority and aimed and shot (hand held no flash) for comparison with the Apple iPhone 8 with accessory zoom lens.
Some people say I look like Alyson Hannigan, the girl who played Willow in Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
Photos (NOT handheld shots) for comparison of the Nikkor 80-400 VR to the 70-200VR with and without the TC-20EII teleconverter. I have uploaded original full size photos for various focal lengths and apertures of each lens, along with two different crops of each photo.
All photos are unedited other than cropping.
The lens, focal length, and aperture data for each photo are given in the filenames.
All photos were taken with a Nikon D200 sitting on a stable piano bench approximately 8 feet from the feather, which was taped to a wall and sticking out horizontally into the air at about the same level as the camera, and roughly perpendicular to the camera's line of sight.
Auto focus was used to focus on the middle of the narrow blue stripe just to the left (in these photos) of the dark eye.
ISO was 100.
VR was off.
Mirror lockup and the default mirror lockup timed shutter release were used to prevent camera shake.
Illumination was from an SB800 flash mounted on the camera in TTL mode.
Spot metering was used.
Photos (NOT handheld shots) for comparison of the Nikkor 80-400 VR to the 70-200VR with and without the TC-20EII teleconverter. I have uploaded original full size photos for various focal lengths and apertures of each lens, along with two different crops of each photo.
All photos are unedited other than cropping.
The lens, focal length, and aperture data for each photo are given in the filenames.
All photos were taken with a Nikon D200 sitting on a stable piano bench approximately 8 feet from the feather, which was taped to a wall and sticking out horizontally into the air at about the same level as the camera, and roughly perpendicular to the camera's line of sight.
Auto focus was used to focus on the middle of the narrow blue stripe just to the left (in these photos) of the dark eye.
ISO was 100.
VR was off.
Mirror lockup and the default mirror lockup timed shutter release were used to prevent camera shake.
Illumination was from an SB800 flash mounted on the camera in TTL mode.
Spot metering was used.
I used portrait mode for this one and I like how the color turned out in the background. I wish it would have looked more like a leaf. 18/20
If you listen closely and turn your volume up, you first hear and see the female owl hoot and after the transition it is the male's turn to hoot at the crows that are harassing them. The female hoot is higher, more rapid and has more syllables than the male's lower-toned 4 syllable "Huh-Hoooo-hoo-huh"
Best Fat Burners Diary News -> Adiphene and Phen375 are competing products that promise the same results and action but deliver in different ways and through different ingredients. Face to face, which one is more effective? Phen375 vs Adiphene Major Ingredients Phen375 : Its six main components are popular chemical compounds that mostly aim to increase the biological metabolic function. 1,3-Dimethypentylamine Hydrochloride – It increases necessary enzymes to boost energy and enhance metabolic function. 1,3,7-Trimethylxanthine – It effectively converts body fat to energy fuel. Capsaicin – Currently a favorite compound for many weight loss supplements, it increases thermogenesis (internal body temperature) leading to faster metabolism. Also, it reduces appetite and craving. LongJack Tongkat Ali – A known aphrodisiac, it increases blood circulation, increasing temperature and metabolism in the... Read the rest of this entry Original Source Post: Phen375 vs Adiphene: An In-depth Comparison feedproxy.google.com/~r/BestFatBurnersDiary/~3/byNiGdUzmJc/
Photos taken from SWFEC showing comparison photos of E10 and E11 on January 10 & 11, 2018. Photos property of SWFEC.
This time, the camera is on a tripod and the scene is lit using an M3 flashbulb in the Minicam flash holder as before with aperture set to f/9.5 and open flash technique. I think that I could have gotten away with setting it to f/11. Look at the shadow on the steps as you compare this with the electronic flash shot. The light from the bulb seems to have carried farther. It certainly overpowered the ambient light to a greater extent than the Cactus KF36 did.
Here's the electronic flash shot for comparison:
Building didn't have air-conditioning in 1971. Notice how big cypress bush grew over almost four decades.
This is a comparison between the original photo (top) and a new "skin air brushing technique" (bottom). I really like the way it turns out... it's just a shame it takes so many steps and time to complete.
As for the picture - it's a very old one (over a year anyway) which was a good test subject as there was a large amount of skin in this photo (which obviously is needed to really demonstrate the technique).
Example of balancing flash against ambient.
Left to right: All 3 shots were shot with the same aperture value to expose the flash lit areas the same (note that the interior is the same brightness). To change the brightness of the car (lit by garage lights) I opened up the shutter exposure longer by 1 stop in each picture. Left to right: f1:13 @ 0.25sec, 0.5sec and 1.0sec ..
Strobist: 580EXII M 1/2 on rear "transmission shaft tunnel" in cabin, pointed at roof. Triggered by PW+II.
Comparison of $1300 Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8 to the brand-new $450 Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 at full wide-angle. Gotta view it at full size.