View allAll Photos Tagged Comparison
Dynamite Girl & FR2 not shown
FR1 (2001/2002) – The first body used in the line; you can easy spot these as the arms have no articulation and the hip joints can only move forwards and backwards.
FRA (2005) – Articulation in the elbow and the mid-upper arm was added to the body in 2005
FR-Tall (2007) – The ladies got longer legs and lost the mid-upper arm ability to spin. The forearm sculpt was also updated, give the models longer arms as well. “Handspeak”, the ability to remove and change hands, was added to the body type in 2011.
FR2 (2010) – The body got a complete (nearly?) makeover with a brand new silhouette that we now know and love.
FR2013 (2013) – The FR2 had a change to the knee joints in 2013 resulting in the FR2013 body, and became explodable in 2014.
FR6.0 (2017) – The sixth iteration of the Fashion Royalty body simply removed the waist joint.
If you put your best foot forward, your day will be great!
Song of London Mary (left) and Minty Magic (right) are side by side so you can see how the first Good Smile Company Blythe doll compares to a Takara Blythe.
wutwut
Threw a couple extra heads in there -3- (I think I have a problem? orz)
The Witch is most similar to the dragon girl, imo (Malificent anyone?) lol. And The gargoyle definitely has some differences to Rochelle - ear placed conveniently for CAM wigs, eyes smaller and less defined and his skin tone is a touch cooler than Rochelle's. Not sure what I prefer, I really like them both!
(I wiped my Rochelle a while ago, rerooting ruined her first repaint and then I changed my mind about her hair color. Now I'm waiting on her supplies to arrive)
Lately I’ve been editing photos with a big hit of gamma correction, for a grayed-out/antique kind-of look? Not quite sure if I’ll stay with it, but I do think it makes things look more… ☆.~:*aesthetic*:~.☆ ? Anyway, here is a comparison. Gamma correction on the left, edited but no gamma correction on the right.
Earlier I received the new Drax Minifigure by FigFactory and I decided to do a comparison to the official minifigure. Both minifigures are great and overloaded with details. I like the version of FigFactory more than the official version, mainly because the 3D print of the tattoos looks really amazing. If you compare it to the real character it is closer to the original, because the tattoos are very thick and look more raised from Drax's body, so this is really great. Also the dull look in Drax's face is much better captured in the custom version. I also really like the leg details with the knives on either side. The only thing that I like better in the official version are the Lego-like skulls in the tattoo print, because I just love when everything gets minifigureized. :D But you will have to decide what you want to be going for, closer to the original or a more funny print. Overall the custom is fantastic, the digital printing quality is great as usual and the faceprint is very well executed.
Mari (left) has the SID body with small bust and mobility joint options. Bianca has the nYID body with large bust and general thighs.
The different in waist and shoulder dimensions are why most nYID fitted clothes do not fit on SID. And while it's not obvious, Mari is larger around the bust measurement than Bianca, despite her smaller bust option.
Both dolls are peach gold skin tone.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not share/reupload my photos on other websites without my permission, thank you!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For mini girls comparisons see here (one of the line ups is also featuring Withdoll & MNF boy).
I was taking some comparison photos today and then I figured I'd take a line up of my mini boys since I have Yenna's Shige visiting here.
Nothing special 'cause the light was awful... thus the low saturation. Also because three of these boys are hybrids and the awful light really highlighted the differences in their resin colour, so I wouldn't want that to be distracting.
But yeah, from left to right:
- Souldoll Soulkid N.L. boy body with a Bimong Narin N401 head
- Withdoll Aiden (new type boy body)
- DollZone 1/4 boy body (old type) with a Dream of Doll DOC Too head
- Minifee A-line normal boy body with a Dream of Doll DOC Tender Too head
I'll put the side and back view into the comments because I don't want to flood my photostream with these. Since they're not the best quality... perhaps sometime I'll ask Yenna to take better line up photos (read: when I have the energy to drag my boys over there, lol).
From left: Jazz Barbie Brunette, Misaki Summer Crush, Souldoll Metel and rerooted Mama told me (Momoko).
left to right: FL Littlefee Ante Elf, Doll Chateau Zora, Minifee Rheia, Doll Chateau Bella, Donn Chateau Isabel.
Here’s some comparison photos of the new Curvy MTM body next to some other dolls. She’s shorter than the Collectors Curvy body and is closer to the Fashionista Curvy but her limbs are slightly thicker.
She has almost the same poseability as an Original MTM body but due to her thicker body type it ALMOST does the same things anyway. Her ankles are as floppy as original MTM so bleh.
Surprisingly her wrists are compatible with Original MTM, which means it’s compatible with older jointed Barbie dolls with vinyl arms AND DC Super Hero Girl hands.
Her ankles though are completely different so if you were hoping to give her smaller feet you’ll need to mod the doll a lot.
Her skin tone is ALMOST Tropic Tan/Nikki but it’s slightly too pink and light. Still darker than other Caucasian skin tones though.
Side-by-side comparison of the Sunrise Models Dodge kit 'out of the box' as the Eastern Scottish example (left) and the lengthened chassis version which was converted from the same original kit as the Fife Scottish version (right).
Welcome to my second comparison of lenses with a focal length of 35 mm. This time all contenders are more than 50 years old and are equipped with the M42 screw-mount. There are two famous lenses amoung it (Flektogon 2.4/35 and Super-Takumar 3.5/35), two insider tips (Color-Skoparex 2.8/35 and Travegon R 3.5/35) and perhaps a stunner.
Results for the center:
Results for the corner:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon MC 2.4/35
Perhaps a Flektogon was the first wide angle lens for SLRs with a retrofocus design, the other suspicious is the Angénieux R1. The first attempt was to put a divergent lens element in front of a well known lens, in that case a Biometar, to obtain a 2.8/35 with a (7/5)-design. In the early seventies the Flektogon was completely redesigned, this time based on a triplet. The new version was cheaper to produce, better and faster, was the first multi-coated lens by CZJ, and it has 6 elements in 6 groups. The lens here has an impressive nearest focus distance of 0.2 m.
Voigländer Color-Skoparex 2.8/35
Made by Rollei in Singapore, belongs to the Voigtländer VSL1 and offers open-aperture-metering with it. It is a (5/5) design by Zeiss and was also available as Distagon with QBM-mount for the Rolleiflex (it is different from the later Distagon for the Contax, which is a (6/6)-design). The Distagon was provided single coated or multi coated (HFT) - I don't know, what the Skoparex is. The lens is from about 1974 and has 6 blades. Another note: the lens has no A/M-switch, but you can close the diaphragm by (carefully!) screw in the tiny set screw next to the aperture pin.
Pentax Auto-Takumar 3.5/35
Clearly the smallest lens of the group. It was produced around 1960. "Auto" means, that the camera automatically closes the aperture via the common pin at the lens mount, but the user has to open it by himself again by pushing the small lever at the f-stop ring, so it is rather "semi-auto". A (5/4)-design with 5 blades.
Pentax Super-Takumar 3.5/35
The same optics like the Auto-Takumar, but in a new outfit: this time with really fully-automatic aperture and with A/M-switch. Usually seen on a Spotmatic.
Enna Lithagon 3.5/35
Certainly the most simple lens in this field. It is based on the 4.5/35 Lithagon, the first retrofocus lens for 35 mm SLRs made in West Germany (1953). The retrofocus effect is achieved by adding a divergent lens element ahead of common lens, so here: the Lithagon has a comparable large front lens element in front of a simple triplet, the result is a (4/4)-design. Also the construction of the lens is simple: full manual aperture setting (even no preset ring) and a rotating front. This combination can by annoying, because you can loose the focus when closing the aperture. 8 blades, the zebra look should be from the late sixties.
A. Schacht Travegon R 3.5/35
Made by a very small manufacturer, but certainly one of the most extravagant lenses of that type which I hold in my hands. The mechanics are extraordinary, the 6 blades sport a ball bearing, the lens has an A/M-switch, a socket for a cable release, and an automatic display for the depth-of-field. The lens was designed by Ludwig Bertele (it's said he designed all lenses of Schacht). As the inventor of the Sonnar Bertele was a master in arranging many lens elements in three groups, so here, the Travegon is a (6/3)-design.
Super Yashinon-R 2.8/35
Perhaps the oldest lens in this field, together with the Auto-Takumar. It was already available for the Yashica Pentaflex around 1960, but then with a bayonet mount. When Yashica switched to the M42 mount with the "J"-series, this lens was carried. It has a preset aperture, 8 blades, a nearest focus distance of 1 m and is a (6/5)-design.
Auto Yashinon DX 2.8/35
The "Auto" indicates an automatic aperture, and there exists also DX-lenses without "Auto" which have a preset aperture then. Contemporary cameras should be the TL and TL Super from the mid-sixties. Those DX lenses were followed by the DS-lenses, rather seen on the TL Elektros. The lens here has an A/M-switch, 6 blades and also an (6/5)-design, and as you can see from the results of this comparison, the design should be very different from the one of the Super Yashinon.
Just showing a comparison between my LAAT/i (?) and LAAT/c.
Yeah, I know, the Carrier looks so clean and sleek compared to the garbled, battle-hardened infantry variant.
While breaking down years of old sets and a few new ones for sorting, i wanted to see how the new Charger set stacked up against my old GARC General Lee.
Providing a side by side comparison of two generations of Wright Gemini double deckers are Metroline's VWH 2016 (Gemini 2) and London General's WHV119 (Gemini 3). The former is on route 7 to East Acton and the latter on a diverted route 14 to Putney Bridge. Both seen in Oxford Street.
Flickr friends - with the new Martian movie soon to be out, I thought I'd share some Earth/Mars Facts!
Average Distance from Sun
Earth - 93 million miles
Mars - 142 million miles
Average Speed in Orbiting Sun
Earth - 18.5 miles per second
Mars - 14.5 miles per second
Diameter
Earth - 7,926 miles
Mars - 4,220 miles
Tilt of Axis
Earth - 23.5 degrees
Mars - 25 degrees
Length of Year
Earth - 365.25 Days
Mars - 687 Earth Days
Length of Day
Earth - 23 hours 56 minutes
Mars - 24 hours 37 minutes
Gravity
Earth - 2.66 times that of Mars
Mars - 0.375 that of Earth
Temperature
Earth - Average 57 degrees F
Mars - Average -81 degrees F
Atmosphere
Earth - nitrogen, oxygen, argon, others
Mars - mostly carbon dioxide, some water vapor
Number of Moons
Earth - 1
Mars - 2
a great white egret and a grey heron side by side ,showing how big the G/W egret really is compared to little egrets
Shape and paperweight comparison for various companies' eyes.
Click 'all sizes' for readable version.
Comparison of the new Mizi doll body type to an older Mizi doll and a few others.
Kiss in the Shadows Poppy is pulling Poppy attitude, acting outraged that her debut photo was a nude.
Running out of ideas? Join We're Here!
Strobist: AB1600 with gridded 60 X30 softbox camera left. Reflector camera right. Triggered by Cybersync.
I recently took a comparison photo of Pureneemo and Picconeemo bodies after realizing that I have all the different sizes of the girls :)
Hopefully some people find this useful!
VH38114 (BU16UXA) is seen alongside VW1397 (LK62DVG) in Golders Green Bus Station, showing the difference in design between the Gemini 3 and Gemini 2. (26/03/16)
Karoline Stone
(left to right) Making an Entrance (2015, redressed), My Allure (2020), Alta Moda (2018)
I don't have NYFW. That's the reason she's missing here.
A professional Ion blaster, compared to the tablescrap mod I made. The added details to the stock SMLE parts really make the prototype one sing. Mine was literally a though I had when I noticed a few extra scoped in the mod parts bin.
I know some of you were asking how to distinguish Gabrielle & Samson.
AEF put this together, It can be hard but is easier if they are together, females are larger. Samson has a flattened toe from when he was a baby.
I shot this as a comparison between two Irix lenses. The Irix 21mm Dragonfly and the Irix 30mm Dragonfly. I thought about doing the 15mm as well but it was running a timelapse that I didn't want to stop....then the clouds rolled in so....I'll save that for another time. 😉
These images are shot with the same settings, same camera and edited with the exact same settings. I know I could edit them better but I was trying to give just a general idea of the focal length difference and overall look of the images produced by each lens and didn't want to get too involved with anything. Keep in mind neither of these lenses have a lens profile in Lightroom yet either...so they should only get better!
Canon R6
Irix 30mm Dragonfly
Irix 20mm Dragonfly
8 sec
f/1.4
ISO 6400
www.irixusa.com/?ius=f387624df552cea2f369918c5e1e12bc&...
Coupon IRIX-ZVBQ
From left to right:
-Volks SDGr, pure white skin
-Volks SDGr, pure normal skin
-Volks SD13, pure normal skin
-Volks SD13, pure normal skin (with a little yellowing)
-Volks SD10 Swaricco, pure white skin
-Volks SD10 Origin, pure normal skin
Uploaded for comparison with the next upload which shows this location after severe flood damage in January 2022.
IMG_0641_1600
Strobist: AB1600 with gridded 60 X30 softbox camera right. Reflector camera left. Triggered by Cybersync.
comparison photos taken from a mid range phone camera which costs around USD280 and a 15yo SLR with flash which weighs over 1kg, camera, lens and flash and costs almost USD2K
A striking comparison. Both vehicles are seven wides and although the M1 Bullpup ACV is bulky looking by itself, it is only a couple of plates higher than the M1151 HMMWV. May I remind you credits for the overall design of the M1 Bullpup ACV go to Andrew Somers and credits for the overall design of the M1151 HMMWV go to Evan Melick. If you notice I made a little switcheroo with the vehicles wheels.
Most of the photos became over exposed but I don't have time to redo the whole shoot. Repetitive and such but I hope these will help. Also, the girls weren't super happy about this new posy friend. LOL.
XS girl, Emotion S, Flection S and Flection M.
Due to changes with Flickr Pro account I'm at the moment removing some of my photos from Flickr. YOu can see the full comparison in my blog here:
littlebookofbluefairies.blogspot.com/2018/02/bad-comparis...