View allAll Photos Tagged difficult

I knew that I could not ignore this project forever and when I saw how bad it was, I thought I'd do a Photo Set series on this difficult retouch. I'll get that started up before too long, after I get more of the steps done. As always, I scanned the original ferrotype as a .TIFF that captured the best I could achieve from the ferrotype. The sloppy term of "tintype" has hounded old images such as this. I suppose it relates to the habit of calling the old Fords, "Tin Lizzies." The fact that the image is well attracted by a magnet proves the original has to be on a ferrous backing. Tin was, of course, an entirely unsuitable material for use as a backing. It was much used for galvanizing steel and iron to prevent rust, somewhat successfully.

 

Different adjustments were applied before arriving here and collapsing the .PSD down to a .TIFF so that it could be retouched on one layer. The original scan was at 1200 dpi and I suspect that a thorough cleaning would not have helped the surface damages which were extensive. In close, it looked like a shotgun blast and must have punched the mouse button thousands of times even after I mitigated the specks that cover the original. That may have been particular to the mistreated ferrotype. I had to treat a load of shotgun style of defects, all of which just take time. After becoming intimately acquainted with the two brothers during my retouch I decided neither kid was a happy camper to be here and the younger has a puffy face like he was crying before the ordeal. Both seem like they were put upon mightily. Woolen stockings? Come on, Ma! That must have been a special experience for the parents to shell out this extraordinary amount of money anf yet have the kids pitch a fit. I expect that the mother's delight in the portrait was proportional to the gaudiness of the outfits. The older boy managed a scowl at best for the portrait. Neither one got a pair of their first long trousers for their first portrait in a strange land. That would be an insult to two young boys! They are probably thinking that one Christianing is enough for a feller. They would have druthered to be out sailing hand made boats down the irrigation ditch or scarfing up crawdads and snakes in muddy attire.

 

I think that I have arrived at the point where I will quit retouching anyway. At some point, you end up retouching the retouching and it will certainly go downhill from there if you want something closer to a photograph instead of a painting and it is more than it was. It's time to build a finished and before & after view and prep my camera for tomorrow. The bald eagle west of town was on the ground stalking a prairie dawg dinner and I was out there without my longest lens. At first glance I thought I could not have seen the scene I was seeing, or something like that. I may got out tomorrow and wait for the eagle to go to work on the bread line again but be ready with my camera propped on the closed car door. Winner, winner, prairie dog dinner. Remember there is a notch in the ecosystem and that eagle knows what it is.

 

I can't imagine that this is anywhere near the hardest retouch that I have done, That honor probably lies with the "Spotted Granny" shot when I finally gave up until an answer popped into my punkin' head as I mulled the problem over. Even at that, I had a hard time convincing the people of the blindingly simple answer. At this point it seems clear that a glass plate might have been used in the camera and the ferrotype was the presentation. Applying any more aggression could result in losses of the original character that I still want in the final reproduction. I don't want to create a fantasy land. I have already done some of the later steps but need to write them up one at a time. I will try to present a reasonable reproduction after all the work. I don't particularly like cartoonish colored fantasy results because I prefer the best REPRODUCTION I can make. I'd coat a ferrous plate and take it into a darkroom if it were a reasonable technique and I could pull it off. Out here in the West, they call those trout "Dolly Varden's," after Dickens' name for his Painted Ladies. That's what I think of some "paint job" portraits that are cropping up lately.

 

FIRST in the series:

LAST in the series:

   

Hacienda Mundaca

Hard to Climb Stairs

This story behind the hacienda, 4km south of town, is perhaps more intriguing than the ruins that remain. A 19th-century slave trader and reputed pirate, Fermín Antonio Mundaca de Marechaja, fell in love with a local woman known as La Trigueña (Brunette). To win her, Mundaca built a two-story mansion complete with gardens and graceful archways, as well as a small fortification.

 

But while Mundaca was building the house, La Trigueña married another islander. Brokenhearted, Mundaca died and his house, fortress and garden fell into disrepair. Some documents indicate that Mundaca died during a visit to Mérida and was buried there. Others say he died on the island, and indeed there’s a grave in the town cemetery that supposedly contains his remains. Despite the skull and crossbones on his headstone (a common memento mori) there’s no evidence in history books that Mundaca was ever a pirate. Instead, it is said he accumulated his wealth by transporting slaves from Africa to Cuba, where they were forced to work in mines and sugarcane fields.

 

Today the mostly ruined complex has some walls and foundations, a large central pond, some rusting cannons and a partially rebuilt house. At the southern end stand a gateway and a small garden. You can still make out the words Entrada de La Trigueña (La Trigueña’s Entrance) etched into the impressive stone arch of the gate.

 

Read more: www.lonelyplanet.com/mexico/yucatan-peninsula/isla-mujere...

 

Hnadcuffs are used to restrain violent persons and in situations where the safety of officers or the public are put at risk.

difficult to say in words on how beautiful is this.

She studied at the St. Petersburg Conservatory (with Alexander had supposed - we interviewed him) and sings in many European countries. And on the street it is difficult to find because of the opera singers (and even on the conductors) always think they are a huge growth - those who are on the scene, always a cut above those in the audience. In fact, in art, everything is a little different than we think.

 

Liubov BELOTSERKOVSKAYA:

THREE "THANK YOU"

THREE "LOVE"

 

JUNIOR CLASSES AND ITALY

As the concert began a stormy life?

Long ago, with lessons on the piano. We went with my parents at the two international competition, and even occupied. They had the euphoria - hurray, our child will be a musician. Then it all started. Why tumultuous life? Interventions require daily activities; stormy life - it is rough work. I was five years old started practicing the piano, and won the first contest, it seems, at nine. Four years of painstaking training, and you're the first prize winner, so anything is possible.

They say that musicians do not have child ...

Of course, nothing is achieved without difficulty, but in the nine years I have visited in Italy. In the class asked me: "Well, how is it? .."

Jealous, I guess.

Respected.

 

PLAYER AND GERGIEV

The first "LOVE"

And listen to what music?

The player I have a classic. Sometimes I like listening to soundtracks to old Hollywood movies, Japanese movies and cartoons - when they are recorded with a symphony orchestra. We have a branch in St. Petersburg, directing - they love to put this music dance and other activities, and they want me and supply it. In general, modern classical authors in Russia are not enough. But we have an interesting cable channel "Mezzo", which sometimes show, for example, the modern opera productions. At the Mariinsky Theatre in "White Nights" has been modernized production of Wagner, a special interest to obtain "Tristan und Isolde." This concert was staged without costumes. Behind a screen, which aired video. It was very organic, with foreign soloists. And he knows how to be an organic Gergiev - no vulgarity, no inconsistencies: the music of Wagner, is a modern video director, they may be together.

 

AFTERNOON IN VENICE

SECOND "LOVE"

Tell us about the last competition.

The contest was held from 2 to 6 July in Padua ...

I really wanted to swim in the sea. We just drove by bus from Venice to Padua on a large bridge across the sea. It was a dream to go out and swim, but no one was swimming - nobody knows where they are the beaches.

Local does not disclose a secret?

No. They are tan, lying in the park, as we have in St. Petersburg, and swimming near Venice itself is prohibited, there is a company and the water is probably not very clean. And somewhere else on the beaches they are, I think, go on the weekends. And on weekends the city is empty, do not ask anyone. On Sunday, Italy dies, everything is closed, the scene of the western: noon, the streets are empty.

And how is it?

If you look at the city as a whole, and not inside the buildings - murals, paintings - you need to go back to the carnival or winter. Very hot, stagnant water in the canals. The town is small, very beautiful and very unique. He did not like Padua, bears no resemblance to Venice Mestre, which is on land.

In September I went to three concerts in Holland - this is my favorite country. I was in Harlem, in Amsterdam. The same North Sea, in St. Petersburg in St. Petersburg but if I'm sick and there, in Holland, I'm getting better.

There is a special student. People go to the festival films in small towns. They can go to another city just to listen to it a new opera production. Which one of us would go for this, for example, in St. Petersburg?

 

VERY HIGH CEILINGS

Those who organize the tours and help along the way and relax?

Trying to help. And sometimes it turns out to combine - some of the concerts are very beautiful. For example, we sang in Venice in the Palazzo Dzakko - a small feudal mansion, but he is built like a Venetian palace, with a through passage to the garden with fountains - you can have fun and seeing a building.

Or ancient European cathedrals - great place. And sing, and watch.

Speakers like?

Yes, there is fertile acoustics, especially for slow pieces. The church works often slow. Musicians are joking, "wrote potatoes" whole empty notes. Perhaps it sounds worse than a quick product: the sound goes, there is too much reverberation. And so - excellent acoustics, no need to give away, you can easily sing piano. The older church - the better acoustics.

In the old European cathedrals had to sing?

In the Netherlands - in Harlem, and in Germany, in a historic cathedral - it was just a charity concert to raise funds for its restoration of the frescoes. Speakers there was phenomenal.

 

HVOROSTOVSKY AND MICROPHONE

A popular in Europe, outdoor concerts, where artists are at ease - it's more complex form of speech?

This can be explained by the fact that people come to Europe to enjoy a classical concert, they need to show. Now all aimed at making the show, so there are artists like Hvorostovsky - and they can see and hear - artists like Netrebko.

On the other hand, a form of a concert close to the theater: you can run around the stage, gesticulating. A character embodied in the theater - it is easier than being in a concert.

Why do we have such a form of concerts are not held?

Maybe artists are afraid of themselves? We have no such equipment, as in the West. Maybe you noticed - at these concerts, singing into a microphone. But the microphone is not like our pop stars, and made especially for them, perceiving other frequencies. We have the technology there is little, only in Moscow, where, incidentally, had already arranged the speeches. For example, on the Sparrow Hills - May 9, Hvorostovsky sang it. There is, of course, were of good quality microphones. But I think that as long as the necessary equipment becomes more widespread, the practice shows such a plan even if enthusiasts will spread very slowly.

 

PARIS - TOKYO

THIRD "LOVE"

Plans for the far-distant future?

In Japan, the same has always been my dream to go, so heard-read about it - Ovichinnikova and other Orientalists. In short, I want to go there.

Invite?

There are clues, but let's see what time will tell.

And what promise to be the embodiment of dreams?

The biggest dream is to be realized in December - a concert in Paris.

In Paris the first time? And - what?

Of course, at Notre Dame. Walking on the Cité. Maybe even go to the cemetery. We will implement the plan, which is in the movie "Paris, je t'aime."

Maybe I'll see Paris and die.

 

PODVERSTKA: three "thank you"

 

After the interview Liubov Belotserkovskaya asked to convey my gratitude to my teacher, Tamara Novichenko. It Honored Artist of Russia and the professor. And yet - the parents and accompanists.

 

Text - Potap PLYUSCHSCH

Photos from the personal archives of Love BELOTSERKOVSKY

  

Thanks to the Nailbourne project, I now understand how the communities and landscape fots in along its length, though that a bubbling noisy stream can just vanish then appear miles away is very difficult to get your head round. The Nailbourne only fully flows in very wet years, but when it does, the beds that are dry now can be several feet deep.

 

But downstream of Littlebourne, where the Nailbourne becomes the Little Stour, it is wider, about six feet wide, clogged with reeds and weeds, but also was used to power to large mills. They both stand, one between Littlebourne and Wickhambreaux, and the other in Wickhambreaux itself, though is now just a house But is a large white clapboard building, with a large wheel.

 

These days, the village looks very prosperous, all grand houses or cottage conversions.

 

From here, the Little Stour makes its way over the marshes which centuries ago was the Wantsum Channel, so Wickhambreaux was almost a seaside town.

 

------------------------------------------

 

The interior of this very pretty church is dominated by nineteenth-century work. The whole of the chancel and baptistry is lined with dark brown encaustic tiles, hiding a straightforward fourteenth-century church. The east window is an early example of American Art Nouveau in England, and dominates the entire building. It was designed by Baron Arild Rosenkrantz in 1896. Above the window are stencilled paintings of angels ascending, which can also be seen in the nave, whilst the roof there has a charming star-spangled sky. At the south-west corner is a vestry - screened off by an eighteenth-century screen which may have formed part of the refitting of the chancel paid for by Mary Young. Her monument in the chancel records that 'infirm from her youth she protracted life to the 68th year of her age'. She left £100 for wainscotting and ornamenting the chancel. The interior viewed from the east gives an unusual appearance as the aisles flank the tower (see also Sandhurst).

 

www.kentchurches.info/church.asp?p=Wickhambreaux

 

------------------------------------------

 

WICKHAM BREAUS

LIES adjoining to Littleborne north-eastward, being usally called Wickham Brook. It is likewise called Wickham by Wingham, to distinguish it from the two other parishes of the same name in this county. In Domesday it is written Wicheham, a name derived from its situation near the banks of the river, which runs close to it. There is only one borough in it, viz. the borough of Wickham, which comprehends the whole parish.

 

Wickham is a low, flat, and unpleasant situation, and lying so near the marshes cannot but be unhealthy, the land throughout it is in general good and sertile, especially near the village, where the fields are very large and level ground. The village, in number about twenty houses, stands at the south-east boundary of the parish, built round a green, over which the road leads to Ickham, having the church and court-lodge on one side, and the parsonage, a handsome brick house, on the other. At the further end of the green, the Lesser Stour crosses the road, and turns a corn-mill belonging to the manor, beyond it is only one house, called the Stone-house, being built of squared stones and slints in chequers, and by the arched windows and door-ways seems of some antiquity. The parish stretches a good distance northward, as far as Groveferry, the house of which is within it, and the greater Stour river, over a level of about 500 acres of marsh land, which extend from the river into a sinus, with a ridge of upland on each side, to within a quarter of a mile of the village. North eastward from which is the Saperton, formerly the property of the Beakes's, who resided here as early as king Henry the VIIIth.'s reign; it was sold by them to the Furneses, whence it came by marriage, with Copthall, in this parish, to the St. John's, viscounts Bolingbroke, who have lately sold it, but one of the family of Beake, many of whom lie buried in this church, now occupies it. A little beyond this is Newnham, once accounted a manor, formerly belonging to the Ropers, lords Teynham, afterwards to the Bartholomews, then to Joseph Brooke, esq. of Rochester, and now to his devisee the Rev. John Kenward Shaw Brooke, of Town-Malling.—Hence among the marshes is the hamlet of Grove, through which the road leads across them to the right over the lesser Stour, to Wingham, Ash, and the eastern parts of Kent, and to the left by Grove-ferry over the Greater Stour, to the northern part of the country and the Isle of Thanet. There is no other wood in the parish excepting Trendley park. There is no fair.

 

At the time of taking the survey of Domesday, in the year 1080, this place was part of those possessions with which that king had enriched his half-brother Odo, the great bishop of Baieux. Accordingly it is thus entered in that record, under the general title of his lands:

 

In Donamesford hundred, the bishop himself holds in demesne Wicheham. It was taxed at four sulings. The arable land is eleven carucates. In demesne there are two carucates, and thirty-six villeins, with thirty-two cottagers having nine carucates. There is a church, and one priest who gives forty shillings per annum. There is one park, and two mills of fifty shillings, and two saltpits of thirtytwo pence, and three fisheries of four shillings, and thirtytwo acres of meadow. Pasture for three hundred sheep and for thirty-one beasts. Wood for the pannage of eighty bogs. In the time of king Edward the Confessor it was worth twenty-five pounds, when he received it twenty pounds, now thirty pounds. There belong to this manor in Canterbury three plats of land paying six shillings and eight pence. Alured Biga held it of king Edward. Moreover there belongs to this manor half a suling of free land, which Sired held of Alured Biga, and Goisfrid, son of Badland, now holds it of the bishop of Baieux, and it is and was worth separately sixty shillings.

 

Four years afterwards the bishop was disgraced, and all his possessions were consiscated to the crown, of which this manor appears afterwards to have been held by the Cliffords. Walter, son of Walter de Clifford, possessed it in the reign of king John, and with Agnes de Cundy, his wife, was a good benefactor to St. Augustine's abbey, and that of St. Radigund. (fn. 1) By the marriage of Margaret, daughter and heir of Walter Clifford, with John de Brewse, it passed into that name, and William de Brewse, or de Braiosa, as they were written in Latin, was possessed of it in the 42d year of king Henry III. His descendant William de Brewse, lord of the honour of Brembre, in Sussex, and of Gower, in Wales, as he stiled himself, whose ancestor came into England with the Conqueror, who gave him the castle of Brember, and whose descendant afterwards, by the marriage with Bertha, daughter and one of the coheirs of Milo, earl of Hereford, became possessed of the castles of Brecknock and Gower likewife, and bore for his arms, Azure, a lion rampant, between twelve cross-croslets, or; though I find by the pedigrees of this family, that his ancestors bore Azure, three bars vaire, argent, and gules. He was several times summoned to parliament in king Edward I.'s reign, as was his son of the same name, both in that and Edward II.'s reign, and died possessed of this manor in the 19th year of the latter. Very soon after which it appears, with the church appendant to it, to have come into the possession of Edmund of Woodstock, earl of Kent, half brother to king Edward II. (fn. 2) After which it descended to his brother John Plantagenet, likewife earl of Kent, it being then held of the king in sergeantry. He died anno 26 Edward III. upon which Joane his sister, commonly called the Fair Maid of Kent, wife of Sir Thomas Holand, became his heir, who in her right not only possessed this manor, but became earl of Kent likewise. She afterwards married Edward the black prince, and died in the 9th year of king Richard II. being succeeded in this manor then held in capite, by Thomas Holand, earl of Kent, her son by her first husband, whose two sons, Thomas and Edward, both earls of Kent, and the former created Duke of Surry, in turn succeeded to it, and the latter dying anno 9 Henry IV. his five sisters became his coheirs, and on a partition made between them, Edmund, earl of March, son of Eleanor, late countess of March, the eldest of them became entitled to this manor in his mother's right, being the last earl of March of this family, for he died s. p. in the 3d year of king Henry VI. being then possessed of it. The year after which, Joane, wife of Sir John Gray, appears by the escheat rolls to have been entitled to it; not long after which it became the property of the family of Tibetot, or Tiptoft, as they were usually called, in whom it continued down to John Tiptost, earl of Worcester, who was attainted and beheaded in 1471, anno 10 Edward IV. king Henry being then restored to the crown. He lest an infant son Edward, who, though he was afterwards restored in blood by king Edward IV. yet I do not find that he was ever reinstated in the possession of this manor, which remained in the crown till the reign of king Henry VIII. who granted it, with the advowson of the church, to Sir Matthew Browne, of Beechworth-castle, who in the 22d year of it, passed it away to Lucy, widow of his uncle Sir Anthony Browne, standard-bearer of England, whose grandson Anthony was, anno I and 2 of Philip and Mary, created viscount Montague, and died possessed of this manor anno 34 Elizabeth, and by his will devised it to his eldest son by his second wife, Sir George Browne, who was of Wickham Breaus, and his grandson Sir George Browne, K. B. leaving two daughters his coheirs, Winifrid, married to Basil Brooks, esq. of Salop, and Eleanor, to Henry Farmer, esq. of Oxfordshire, they joined in the sale of it, at the latter end of Charles II.'s reign, to Sir H. Palmer, bart. of Wingham, who died possessed of it in 1706, s. p. and by his will devised it to his nephew Sir Thomas Palmer, bart. who died in 1723, and by his will gave it to his natural son Herbert Palmer, esq. who married Bethia, one of the daughters of Sir Thomas D'Aeth, bart. of Knowlton, who died in 1760, s. p., having devised this manor, with the advowson of the church appendant, to his widow. She afterwards married John Cosnan, esq. who in her right became possessed of it, and died in 1778, s. p. leaving her furviving, upon which she again became entitled to the possession of it, and continued owner of it till her death in 1797, on which it came to her nephew Sir Narborough D'Aeth, bart. of Knowlton, the present owner of it. A court leet and court baron is held for this manor.

 

Trendley park, now accounted a manor of itself, is situated at the north-west boundary of this parish, being entirely separated from the rest of it by that of Littleborne intervening. It was part of the possessions of Odo, bishop of Baieux, and is noticed in the survey of Domesday, in the description of the manor of Wickham above recited, in which it is mentioned as being then a park; and it should seem that at least part of it was then accounted as appurtenant to that manor; though in the description of the manor of Littleborne, in the same survey, which then belonged to the abbey of St. Augustine, it appears that the bishop had lands belonging to that manor too lying within his park here. Of this manor the bishop of Baieux has in his park as much land as is worth sixty shillings, says the record. In part of the recompence for which, the bishop seems to have given the abbot the manor of Garwinton, in Littleborne, and other land within the manor of Leeds, as may be seen by the entries of both these manors in the same record. Soon after which there was another exchange of land made between the bishop and archbishop Lanfranc, for some which lay within his park of Wikeham. What is remarkable in this instrument is, that it is given in two languages, in Saxon and Latin, but neither is a translation of the other, for both are originals, as was a frequent custom of that time. Appendant to it is the bishop's seal in wax, representing him on one side on horseback, with his sword and spurs, as an earl, and on the other habited as a bishop, with his pastoral staff; being perhaps the only seal of Odo at this time extant. (fn. 3) By all which it appears, that this park is much more antient than that of Woodstock, which has been accounted the first inclosed park in England. How long it continued an inclosed park, I have no where found; but in the beginning of king Henry VI.'s reign it was not so, as appears by the escheat-rolls of the 3d year of it, after the death of Edmund, earl of March, at which time there were two hundred acres of wood in it. He was lord of the manor of Wickham, and Trendley park was chiefly at that time certainly appurtenant to it, and continued so whilst in the possession of the same owners, which it did most probably till the attainder of John Tiptost, earl of Worcester, in the 10th year of king Edward IV. when they both came into the hands of the crown, and though king Henry VIII. afterwards granted the manor of Wickham to Sir Matthew Browne, yet I do not find that Trendley park was granted with it. From which time it has had separate owners. For some time it has been the property of the family of Denne, who continue at this time the owners of it. It lies in an unpleasant, lonely part of the parish, facing Westbere, and consists of three hundred acres of woodland, and a house called the Park-house. There is a high road through the middle of it from Stodmarsh to Canterbury market, which in king Edward II.'s reign, was attempted to be shut up, but the sheriff, with the posse comitatus, was ordered to open it again, as being an antient and allowed high road.

 

Charities.

Andrew Holness, of Seton, in Ickham, by will in 1554, gave to the poor 2s. in money and bread, to be distributed yearly; the churchwardens to take so much yearly out of his lands in Ickham and Wickham, except his house and garden at Seton, in case his executors did not give the same yearly.

 

Henry Sloyden, of Wickham Breaus, by will in 1568, gave for the use of the poor and Littleborne, in equal portions, a piece of land containing six acres and a half in the latter parish, called Church-close, which is distributed twice a year by the respective minister and churchwardens, and is of the annual produce of 4l.

 

John Smith, rector of this parish, by deed in 1656, gave a school-room, and a house and garden for a schoolmaster, in this parish, for teaching the children of it. The master to be chosen from one of his relations in preference, if any such could be found, is vested in the rector and churchwardens of this parish.

 

Sir Henry Palmer, of Bekesborne, by his will in 1611, gave the sum of 10s. to each of the several parishes of Wickham, Stodmarsh, Littleborne, and five others therein mentioned, to be paid into the hands of the minister and churchwardens yearly, out of his manor and lands of Well-court, at Michaelmas, towards the relief of the poor of each of them.

 

Thomas Belke, D. D. rector of this parish, by will in 1712, gave 501. for the putting out of five poor children of this parish apprentices.

 

There are about thirty poor constantly relieved, and casually seventy.

 

This parish is within the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the diocese of Canterbury, and deanry of Bridge.

 

¶The church, which is dedicated to St. Andrew, consists of three isles and one chancel, having at the west end a square tower, in which hang six bells. The church is not large, but is handsome and neat. In the middle isle are several memorials for the Beakes, of Saperton. In the south isle for the Larkins, who lived at Grove, in this parish. In the east window are remains of good painted glass, viz. the arms of Edward the black price and of Mortimer, quartered with Burgh, and a representation of Herod's daughter beheading John the Baptist. In the chancel, on the pavement, is the figure of a priest in brass, and inscription, for Henry Welde, rector, obt. 1420. A gravestone, and monument for Alexander Young, B D. rector of this parish, who rebuilt this parsonage-house, and repaired that of Eastchurch, of which he was vicar likewife, at the expence of 2000l. obt. March 21, 1755. A memorial for John Smith, rector, obt. Oct. 28, 1658. In the church-yard are many headstones, and a tombstone for the family of Beake. In the windows of this church there were formerly many different shields of arms, long since demolished.

 

This church was always an appendage to the manor, and continues so at this time, Sir Narborough D' Aeth, bart. owner of the manor of Wickham, being the present patron of it.

 

There was antiently both a rectory and vicarage in this church, which continued till the year 1322, when on a vacancy of the latter, Richard de Newcastle, the rector, petitioned archbishop Walter Reynolds, that they might be consolidated, which was granted, and they have continued in that state to the present time. (fn. 4)

 

This rectory is valued in the king's books at 29l. 12s. 6d. and the yearly tenths at 2l. 19s. 3d. In 1588 it was valued at 250l. communicants one hundred and sixty-three. In 1640 the same. There are eighteen acres of glebe-land.

 

The marsh-lands in this parish, within Wickham and Preston valleys, pay a modus of two-pence an acre, and those within Newnham 1½d. only, in lieu of all tithes.

 

www.british-history.ac.uk/survey-kent/vol9/pp158-166

My cousin Dave spinning poi. He's crazy at it.

 

Follow Me on Facebook!

(ITA below)

 

"All My People / All Mankind" is a series of portraits of friends in Italy and abroad, that I have been taken via webcam during the quarantine. The title is a song by Liam Gallagher and has a double interpretation. All my people are those who have been there during this difficult time, everybody in their own way. I have never felt so much empathy for people before like in this surreal and difficult time. These photos are my tribute to them. Each person has been photographed in his/her favourite corner of the house or while dedicating to a hobby or activity. The link between me and many of these people is music. My intention was to catch the empathic connection between me and them despite the distance and three devices (our webcams and my camera) dividing us.

All mankind is the second interpretation. Each person their own story and the Covid-19 emergency has had consequences on everybody's life. Some of those people in the photos have been isolated for three months trying to protect their old parents, have struggled against the virus living in complete isolation without even going out to buy food, have lost their jobs, had planned to get married and could not, could not visit their families in other regions for months, had to work from home while taking care of a child. These are universal stories in which everybody can recognize themselves. They teach us that the mankind has a great power to adapt. Some people have started teaching online, have started home radio station, have recorded music, made drawings out of my photos, have volunteered. Together we have done photo shootings, guitar and yoga lessons, birthday parties. We have not given up because life always finds the way to prevail.

  

(ITA)

"All My People / All Mankind" è un progetto personale di ritratti scattati ad amici italiani e stranieri tramite webcam durante la quarantena. Il titolo è una canzone di Liam Gallagher e ha una doppia chiave di lettura.

All my people, la mia gente, sono le persone che sono state presenti in questo periodo difficile, ciascuna a modo suo. Mai ho provato tanta empatia verso altri esseri umani come in questo periodo così surreale e delicato. Queste foto sono un tributo a loro. Tutti i protagonisti sono stati ritratti nei loro angoli preferiti di casa o mentre si dedicavano alle loro passioni o attività. Il legame comune tra me e quasi tutte le persone è la musica. Lo scopo di queste foto è catturare la connessione empatica tra me e i soggetti, nonostante la distanza e tre dispositivi (le rispettive webcam e la mia macchina fotografica) a separarci.

All mankind, tutta l'umanità, è la seconda chiave di lettura. Ogni persona ha la sua storia e l'emergenza sanitaria ha avuto delle conseguenza sulla propria vita, cambiandola più o meno profondamente. C'è chi ha vissuto tre mesi in isolamento con i genitori anziani cercando di proteggerli, chi ha contratto il virus e ha sofferto le difficoltà fisiche e l'isolamento totale, chi doveva sposarsi e ha dovuto rimandare, chi ha perso il lavoro e non vede prospettive, chi è lontano dalla sua famiglia senza possibilità di raggiungerla in un'altra regione, chi ha dovuto adattarsi a svolgere il proprio lavoro da casa, in alcuni casi dovendo badare contemporaneamente ad un figlio. Chiunque può riconoscersi in queste persone, perché sono storie universali che ci insegnano la grande forza di adattamento dell'umanità: chi si è riadattato ad insegnare on-line, chi ha condotto un suo programma radiofonico da casa, chi ha disegnato ispirandosi a delle mie foto, chi si è dedicato alla musica scrivendo canzoni, chi ha fatto volontariato, chi ha iniziato ad inventarsi un nuovo lavoro per la fase che verrà. Insieme abbiamo fatto shooting fotografici, lezioni di chitarra, feste di compleanno, lezioni di yoga. Via webcam, ma non ci siamo arresi o fermati. Perché la vita trova sempre il modo di prevalere.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

The Big Hill on the Canadian Pacific Railway main line in British Columbia, Canada, was the most difficult piece of railway track on the Canadian Pacific Railway's route.[1] It was situated in the rugged Canadian Rockies west of the Continental Divide and Kicking Horse Pass. Even though the Big Hill was replaced by the Spiral Tunnels in 1909, the area has long been a challenge to the operation of trains and remains so to this day.

 

The essential problem was that the railway had to ascend 1,070 feet (330 m) in the space of 10 miles (16 km) from Field at 4,267 feet (1,301 m) climbing to the top of the Continental Divide at 5,340 feet (1,630 m).[2] The narrow valleys and high mountains limited the space where the railway could stretch out and limit the grade (hence the later decisions to bore extra mileage under the mountains and lower the grades)

 

Construction

 

To complete the Pacific railway as quickly as possible, a decision was made to delay blasting a lengthy 1,400 feet (430 m) tunnel through Mount Stephen and instead build a temporary 8-mile (13 km) line over it. Instead of the desired 2.2% grade (116 feet to the mile) a steep 4.5% grade was built in 1884[3] (some sources say 4.4%). This was one of the steepest railway lines anywhere. It descended from Wapta Lake to the base of Mount Stephen, along the Kicking Horse River to a point just west of Field, then rose again to meet the original route.

 

Three safety switches were built to protect against runaway trains. These switches led to short spurs with a sharp reverse upgrade and they were kept in the uphill position until the operator was satisfied that the train descending the grade towards him was not out of control. Speed was restricted to eight miles per hour (13 km/h) for passenger trains and six (10 km/h) for freight, and elaborate brake testing was required of trains prior to descending the hill. Nevertheless, disasters occurred with dismaying frequency.

 

Field was created solely to accommodate the CPR’s need for additional locomotives to be added to trains about to tackle the Big Hill. Here a stone roundhouse with turntable was built at what was first known simply as Third Siding. In December 1884 the CPR renamed it Field after C.W. Field, a Chicago businessman who, the company hoped, might invest in the region after he had visited on a special train they had provided for him.

 

At that time, standard steam locomotives were 4-4-0s, capable enough for the prairies and elsewhere, but of little use on the Big Hill. Baldwin Locomotive Works was called upon to build two 2-8-0s for use as Field Hill pusher engines in 1884. At the time they were the most powerful locomotives built. Two more followed in June 1886. The CPR began building its own 2-8-0s in August 1887, and over the years hundreds more were built or bought.

The Spiral Tunnels

The old and the new line

Lower portal of "Number Two" tunnel, Spiral Tunnels, Field, British Columbia. The locomotives are passing under the train they are pulling.

 

The Big Hill "temporary" line was to remain the main line for twenty-five years, until the famous Spiral Tunnels were opened on September 1, 1909.

 

The improvement project was started in 1906, under the supervision of John Edward Schwitzer, the senior engineer of CPR’s western lines. The first proposal had been to extend the length of the climb, and thus reduce the gradient, by bypassing the town of Field at a higher level, on the south side of the Kicking Horse river valley. This idea had quickly been abandoned because of the severe risk of avalanches and landslips on the valley side. Also under consideration was the extension of the route in a loop northwards, using both sides of the valley of the Yoho river to increase the distance, but again the valley sides were found to be prone to avalanches. It was the experience of severe disruption and delay caused by avalanches on other parts of the line (such as at the Rogers Pass station, which was destroyed by an avalanche in 1899) that persuaded Schwitzer that the expensive solution of digging spiral tunnels was the only practical way forward.

 

The route decided upon called for two tunnels driven in three-quarter circles into the valley walls. The higher tunnel, "number one," was about one thousand yards in length and ran under Cathedral Mountain, to the south of the original track. When the new line emerged from this tunnel it had doubled back, running beneath itself and 50 feet (15 m) lower. It then descended the valley side in almost the opposite direction to its previous course before crossing the Kicking Horse River and entering Mount Ogden to the north. This lower tunnel, "number two," was a few yards shorter than "number one" and the descent was again about fifty feet. From the exit of this tunnel the line continued down the valley in the original direction, towards Field. The constructions and extra track would effectively double the length of the climb and reduce the ruling gradient to 2.2%. The new distance between Field and Wapta Lake, where the track levels out, is 11 1⁄2 miles (18.5 km).[4]

 

The contract was awarded to the Vancouver engineering firm of MacDonnell, Gzowski and Company and work started in 1907. The labor force amounted to about a thousand and the cost was about 1.5 million Canadian dollars.

 

Even after the opening of the spiral tunnels, Field Hill remained a significant challenge and it was necessary to retain the powerful locomotives at Field locomotive depot.[4]

This location is a difficult place for historians especially in Germany. Most want to ignore or forget it. There is no sign or marker to let you know what was here.

 

It is the sight of [in Berlin] of Adolf Hitler's underground Bunker in 1945 during the final days of the World War 2.

 

Seeing modern Berlin today you can not imagine what it was like here at that time unless you study the history.

 

Recomended Book: "A Woman in Berlin" by Anonymous

Metropolitan Books

 

"I will always choose a lazy person to do a difficult job... Because he will find an easy way to do it."

-Bill Gates

The day almost ended in disaster before it had really begun. We booked the train tickets many months ago, but as time went on we found it was going to be difficult to hire a car and travel back home, so instead of traveling to the end of the line at Fort William, we would get off in Glasgow and get a taxi to the airport. We tried to change our official tickets, but couldn’t, so on getting on the train, we well th hostess, she makes notes and tell us that her successor would wake us up at half five with breakfast so we would be ready to get off the train at six.

 

It all seemed set, so we went to bed thinking it was all under control. And as the journey went on through the night, I felt for movement of the train wondering where in Britain we might be depending on whether I could feel movement or not.

 

I must have laid in bed for a while, wondering still where and when we were. I finally looked at the screen on my mobile to find it quarter to six! Eeek!

 

We had 15 minutes to get dressed and squeeze or cases close and be ready to get off. We rang for the assistant, who apologised, and it wasn’t her fault either. But we were running behind time, so we had half an hour before we got off.

 

The train crept through Glasgow and then headed out fo the city west alongside the river. At twenty past, we arrived at Dalmuir, heavy drizzle was falling, and as we got off the train, no taxi could be seen.

 

I called up the company, and they sent a cab to pick us up, arriving a few minutes later, loading our luggage inot the boot, then growling at us as to where we wanted to go, and apparently unimpressed thst we had come all the way from DOver to be here.

 

He took no time taking us through the housing estate, onto the motorway then across the bridge over the river, turning off and arriving at the airport.

 

From being in a panic an hour before, we were now on time, and once at the car hire office found it to open, some 15 minutes early. We are told that no signatures were required, the keys were ready to pick up from Omar in the office in the pound.

 

Omar gives me the key to an Audi A4, which is a great and quick car. We put in our bags, and find that the car was already pretty much full, and we had to pick up Tiny who had stayed on the train from Fort William.

 

Amazingly, we were on the road at seven, driving back to the river corssing then taking the road north. Always north from now.

 

We go into the centre of Dumbarton to look for a place to do some shopping. We find Morrison’s, and go inside, only to find the shop almost empty, at least with more staff than customers. Back home this would already be packed with people. We go round and buy what we think we would need for the three of us.

 

Back out onto the main road, we descend to the banks of Loch Lomond, taking the low road as it followed the contours of the Loch. We stop at a country park overlooking the loch, not a breath of wind stirred with water below, so we ate sausage rolls surround by a cloud of midges.

 

The road carried on, all around the bonnie bonnie banks of Loch Lomond before the road began to climb and climb, higher and higher until the trees ran out, and on both sides the vista opened out.

 

We stop at a greasy spoon for a coffee and Tunnock’s Caramel slice at a parking area overlooking the valley below as it began to climb again.

 

Up and down the road goes, and up again until we come to the top end of Glencoe, and in front of us the vista opens out with dark ominous clouds above and valley sides that had been carved by glaciers

 

At the far end of the valley, the road had reached sea level, and in a few more minutes we roll into Fort William, where Tony was waiting at the station, having arrived just a few minutes ahead of us.

 

From there the road branched out along a sea loch, alongside the railway which also was going to Mallaig. The sea loch opened out so we could see open ocean in the distance, we join other cars in parking up beside the coast so we could all take shots.

 

Sadly, parking at Glenfinnan was full, but we shall return at some point. Anyway, we only had half an hour to go before we arrived at Mallaig and the ferry terminal. Sadly, we had failed to book passage beforehand, and so had to buy a standby ticket, but we were told there would be no trouble getting on as we were the first in the reserve queue.

 

We had an hour to kill before the boarding began, so we go for a wander round the town. Mallaig exists for fishing anf being the starting point of the Skye ferry. The railway line also ends here, but the town itself probably has less than 1o thousand people, but it picturesque enough, set around the harbour, filled wit small fishing boats.

 

Jools and I have lunch in the Mission Cafe, while Tony goes for an hour walk being measured on Strava.

 

At one everyone goes back to their cars and boarding begins. Once all the booked cars and buses go on, we are allowed to follow onto the ferry.

 

We get out of the car and climb to the passenger decks above, until I get to the open dicks ready to witness the casting off.

 

By now the day was bright, so sunshine shone off the heather on the hills of the mainline and on the island. The crossing took just half an hour, the ferry reversed into the berth and we were allowed back to our cars ready to depart.

The cottage was just a four mile drive along the coast, turning up the hill and into the driveway. Here at last.

 

It is a fine modern bungalow with a large picture window overlooking the sound and the mainland beyond. We unload the car of our luggage and shopping, and fill up wardrobes and cupboards, finally able t put the kettle on for a well-deserved brew.

 

We had forgotten to bring coffee for Jools, so Tony and I go out in the car to find a shop. Over the other side of the island we find a Co-Op, it is well stocked and we find coffee, more Coke and beer for me.

 

We fly back over to the cottage, over the moor along a newly tarmaced road, traveling at a little over the limit, arriving back so I could make a coffee for Jools.

 

We sit in the living room, not watching TV, but the scene out of the large window, as the setting sun cast wonderful light on the sound and hills beyond. Dinner was a simple pasta dish with tomato sauce, into which I put some square sausage to added flavour. Local flavour.

 

And that was your day, arrived and settled in.

Quite difficult finding a good vantage point from this side of the river looking back towards Tower Bridge and The Shard. Decided on a rare vertical composition to make the most of the smooth water and streaky skies enabled by the long 7 min exposure.

Zaatari refugee camp, Jordan.

( Story by Hala Al Ayoubi )

 

‘It is not those who can inflict the most, but those who can suffer the most who will conquer’:

 

These words were spoken by Irish patriot, Terence McSweeney in 1920 when his native Ireland was being ripped apart by the War of Independence. Although directly referring to the struggle faced by his countrymen some 90 years ago McSweeney’s haunting words can be applied to the thousands forced to seek sanctuary in a Jordanian refugee camp to in order to escape Syria’s on-going internal conflict. As a native Syrian, born in Damascus, I found the graphic images of my fellow countrymen and women shown on various television news channels both disturbing and upsetting. I was so moved by their plight. I wanted to see for myself the suffering and horrors of the living in limbo scenario they now faced on a daily basis. I was literally driven by an internal emotion I had never experienced before. I simply had to see what was happening to my people. Within days my photographer and I were on our way to Jordan. What we saw and witnessed on our trip is difficult to put into words. However, it is important I do record what we saw in the hope it highlights the human tragedy that is currently the plight of the Syrian refugees – my people.

  

Just six miles over of the Jordan-Syria border is the UN run Zaatari refugee camp. Located in the middle of a barren, windswept desert Zaatari is the temporary home of thousands of men, women and children forced to flee their homes in Syria because of the continuing conflict. At first sight Zaatari is a desolate place. It exudes an air of isolation. Its heavy wire perimeter fencing is intimidating and immediately creates the impression of a prison. This feeling is compounded by the presence of Jordanian police and soldiers who guard main entrance to the camp. As our car pulls up guards watch us intently. Our driver takes our passports and passes to a camp official. Documents approved, we are given permission to enter Zaatari.

  

As we drive through the second gate the reality of Zaatari looms before us. To the left the French and Italian international field hospitals. On the right the countless rows of dust shrouded tents, home for the refugees, are draped across the harsh desert landscape. Despite the dust the letters UNHCR are clearly visible on each of the tents. As we begin to walk around the camp it is obvious the situation is really difficult. Living conditions are very basic. There is a lack of proper sanitation with people often standing in line to use toilets and bathrooms. There is barely enough water and electricity is almost non-existent. Clothing is at a premium. Food is mundane and repetitive. Dust is everywhere. Blasts of sand ravage the simple, thin tents and their occupants The swirls of suffocating sand ensure everyone in Zaatari carries a powdering of dust and grim. Residents are told on a daily basis ‘things will get better’. They never do.

  

As a Mum I was particularly moved by the plight of Mothers and their children living in Zaatari camp. This is not a ‘Child friendly Zone’ despite the presence of a tiny and very basic kids play area. The provision of a slide and a see-saw do little to resolve the suffering and trauma of kids who have witnessed horrendous scenes of brutality and violence in the on-going Syrian conflict. Many of these children are now mentally scarred for life! Their drawn and dusty faces say it all. Disease is also rife within the child population of Zaatari – measles and cholera top the list. Although officials plan to introduce a measles immunisation programme shortly it will do little, if anything, to relive a problem which is fast becoming a humanitarian catastrophe. The plight of Zaatari’s child population is particularly heart-breaking. They are the innocent victims of a situation they did not create. However, there is a faint glimmer of hope on the horizon for the refugee children. A hope their future will not be as desolate as their past. That hope is education. There are approximately some 4,000 children of school-age within Zaatari. The task of educating them is a considerable challenge. The majority of children have lost out on months of schooling through the violence in Syria. However, many have lost their entire families. They are totally alone and are cared for by organisations such as UNICEF and Save the Children.

  

When I visited Zaatari classes were held in temporary makeshift tented accommodation. The authorities plan to supply a more permanent type of classroom shortly but, in the interim kids simply have to make do with what is available. A retired teacher, now working in Zaatari told me education was vital for the refugee children. The routine of the classroom, he said, gave the children something to do on a regular basis. It also removed the biggest problem facing the kids – one of boredom. “We are not just educating these children”, he said “we are attempting to save a complete generation and give it a future”. As a Syrian and a Mother I hope that objective is achieved sooner rather than later.

  

As I toured the Zaatari camp it became obvious many people were too scared to talk. Despite the fact I was a fellow Syrian very few wanted to speak on camera or have their identities revealed. Although they have fled their homeland many refugees – should they return to Syria – are frightened they will be the targeted in revenge attacks by supporters of President Bashar al-Assad. There is also the very real fear members of the Syrian secret police – the Mukhabarat – are active within the Zaatari refugee camp. Fear of the Mukhabarat pervades the atmosphere of the camp. It intimidates the residents and stops the majority of them speaking out.

  

However, there are those who are prepared to speak on the condition their identity is protected. A mother of four told me she and her children fled Syria fearing they would be killed if they remained in the home. Although now living in the relative safety of Zaatari she told me she how longed to return to her own country: ‘Life in the camp is killing us. It’s unbearable. Dirt and dust are everywhere. We live, sleep and eat the dust. This is not life. It’s barely an existence’.

  

‘I just want to go back. Go back to my home, that’s all I want but, there is nothing there now. They destroyed everything in my town. What can we do? We have to stay here. We have nowhere else to go’.

  

Abdul and his family have been in Zataari for 27 days. He told me they fled their home in Syria to escape the constant bomb attacks and killings: ‘All my family is here, my wife and children. We had to leave. To stay in our home was too dangerous. People I knew were killed in the bomb attacks. If we had stayed we would have died’.

  

‘Getting to Jordan was difficult. But we had to get away from Bashar’s bombs. My wife and I just ran, we ran with our kids. We just took them and ran’.

  

‘But we are living like animals now. Conditions are really bad here. We have no clothes, food is always the same and we have very little water. Just look at us, look at my children. They are living in a tent and sleeping on the ground.’

  

With winter looming large on the horizon Zaatari’s residents will face additional problems in their struggle to survive. The desert is already very cold at night. With temperatures due drop to around freezing point in the next few weeks there is now a race against time to ensure the camp is properly prepared for the colder weather. Prime objectives for the Camp authorities are the distribution of heaters, thermal, blankets and the insulation of the refugees tented accommodation.

  

Abdul fear the arrival of the freezing winter weather: ‘We don’t know what it will be like in the winter. Will we get blankets and heaters – we just don’t know. How can little children survive the winter living in a tent. This is no way for them to live. When it gets cold and rains then it will be miserable here ’.

  

There is clearly a growing feeling within Zaatari’s refugee population that ‘Nobody cares about us’. A belief exists that until the world recognises and helps those interned behind the wire and barriers the suffering will continue and get worse. Actions do speak louder than words. However, words are cheap but human aid expensive!

  

Zaatari is meant to be a place of refuge for the countless displaced Syrians. However, the camp is quickly becoming the venue for escalating tensions between the refugees and their hosts, the Jordanians. Tensions which have already exploded into violence which has seen tents set on fire and property damaged in protests over living condition. Those tensions will increase and the prospect of further violence remains strong if living conditions do not improve drastically.

  

Refugees living in Zaatari are human beings. They are individuals with names, personalities and unique personal stories to tell. They are also my fellow countrymen and women. Until recently they were able to work, earn a living and support their families. Now their lives have been changed irrevocably through the violence in Syria. All these people want is to have their voices heard. To be acknowledge and accepted as people and not to be portrayed as parasites living off the Jordanian system. Above all they just want to go back to their homes in Syria and live their lives. Sadly, at this time and for the foreseeable future that is impossible.

  

As I left Zaatari Terrence McSweeney’s words: ‘It is not those who can inflict the most, but those who can suffer the most who will conquer’ flooded through my mind. Those words proved correct in respect of the people of Ireland. I believe these very same words do and will apply to the Syrian refugees in Zaatari. My hope is it the suffering they now endure on a daily basis will be short lived. Unlike my fellow countrymen and women I have been able to escape the suffering that is Zaatari refugee camp.

 

Hala Al Ayoubi.

 

Thanks to the Nailbourne project, I now understand how the communities and landscape fots in along its length, though that a bubbling noisy stream can just vanish then appear miles away is very difficult to get your head round. The Nailbourne only fully flows in very wet years, but when it does, the beds that are dry now can be several feet deep.

 

But downstream of Littlebourne, where the Nailbourne becomes the Little Stour, it is wider, about six feet wide, clogged with reeds and weeds, but also was used to power to large mills. They both stand, one between Littlebourne and Wickhambreaux, and the other in Wickhambreaux itself, though is now just a house But is a large white clapboard building, with a large wheel.

 

These days, the village looks very prosperous, all grand houses or cottage conversions.

 

From here, the Little Stour makes its way over the marshes which centuries ago was the Wantsum Channel, so Wickhambreaux was almost a seaside town.

 

------------------------------------------

 

The interior of this very pretty church is dominated by nineteenth-century work. The whole of the chancel and baptistry is lined with dark brown encaustic tiles, hiding a straightforward fourteenth-century church. The east window is an early example of American Art Nouveau in England, and dominates the entire building. It was designed by Baron Arild Rosenkrantz in 1896. Above the window are stencilled paintings of angels ascending, which can also be seen in the nave, whilst the roof there has a charming star-spangled sky. At the south-west corner is a vestry - screened off by an eighteenth-century screen which may have formed part of the refitting of the chancel paid for by Mary Young. Her monument in the chancel records that 'infirm from her youth she protracted life to the 68th year of her age'. She left £100 for wainscotting and ornamenting the chancel. The interior viewed from the east gives an unusual appearance as the aisles flank the tower (see also Sandhurst).

 

www.kentchurches.info/church.asp?p=Wickhambreaux

 

------------------------------------------

 

WICKHAM BREAUS

LIES adjoining to Littleborne north-eastward, being usally called Wickham Brook. It is likewise called Wickham by Wingham, to distinguish it from the two other parishes of the same name in this county. In Domesday it is written Wicheham, a name derived from its situation near the banks of the river, which runs close to it. There is only one borough in it, viz. the borough of Wickham, which comprehends the whole parish.

 

Wickham is a low, flat, and unpleasant situation, and lying so near the marshes cannot but be unhealthy, the land throughout it is in general good and sertile, especially near the village, where the fields are very large and level ground. The village, in number about twenty houses, stands at the south-east boundary of the parish, built round a green, over which the road leads to Ickham, having the church and court-lodge on one side, and the parsonage, a handsome brick house, on the other. At the further end of the green, the Lesser Stour crosses the road, and turns a corn-mill belonging to the manor, beyond it is only one house, called the Stone-house, being built of squared stones and slints in chequers, and by the arched windows and door-ways seems of some antiquity. The parish stretches a good distance northward, as far as Groveferry, the house of which is within it, and the greater Stour river, over a level of about 500 acres of marsh land, which extend from the river into a sinus, with a ridge of upland on each side, to within a quarter of a mile of the village. North eastward from which is the Saperton, formerly the property of the Beakes's, who resided here as early as king Henry the VIIIth.'s reign; it was sold by them to the Furneses, whence it came by marriage, with Copthall, in this parish, to the St. John's, viscounts Bolingbroke, who have lately sold it, but one of the family of Beake, many of whom lie buried in this church, now occupies it. A little beyond this is Newnham, once accounted a manor, formerly belonging to the Ropers, lords Teynham, afterwards to the Bartholomews, then to Joseph Brooke, esq. of Rochester, and now to his devisee the Rev. John Kenward Shaw Brooke, of Town-Malling.—Hence among the marshes is the hamlet of Grove, through which the road leads across them to the right over the lesser Stour, to Wingham, Ash, and the eastern parts of Kent, and to the left by Grove-ferry over the Greater Stour, to the northern part of the country and the Isle of Thanet. There is no other wood in the parish excepting Trendley park. There is no fair.

 

At the time of taking the survey of Domesday, in the year 1080, this place was part of those possessions with which that king had enriched his half-brother Odo, the great bishop of Baieux. Accordingly it is thus entered in that record, under the general title of his lands:

 

In Donamesford hundred, the bishop himself holds in demesne Wicheham. It was taxed at four sulings. The arable land is eleven carucates. In demesne there are two carucates, and thirty-six villeins, with thirty-two cottagers having nine carucates. There is a church, and one priest who gives forty shillings per annum. There is one park, and two mills of fifty shillings, and two saltpits of thirtytwo pence, and three fisheries of four shillings, and thirtytwo acres of meadow. Pasture for three hundred sheep and for thirty-one beasts. Wood for the pannage of eighty bogs. In the time of king Edward the Confessor it was worth twenty-five pounds, when he received it twenty pounds, now thirty pounds. There belong to this manor in Canterbury three plats of land paying six shillings and eight pence. Alured Biga held it of king Edward. Moreover there belongs to this manor half a suling of free land, which Sired held of Alured Biga, and Goisfrid, son of Badland, now holds it of the bishop of Baieux, and it is and was worth separately sixty shillings.

 

Four years afterwards the bishop was disgraced, and all his possessions were consiscated to the crown, of which this manor appears afterwards to have been held by the Cliffords. Walter, son of Walter de Clifford, possessed it in the reign of king John, and with Agnes de Cundy, his wife, was a good benefactor to St. Augustine's abbey, and that of St. Radigund. (fn. 1) By the marriage of Margaret, daughter and heir of Walter Clifford, with John de Brewse, it passed into that name, and William de Brewse, or de Braiosa, as they were written in Latin, was possessed of it in the 42d year of king Henry III. His descendant William de Brewse, lord of the honour of Brembre, in Sussex, and of Gower, in Wales, as he stiled himself, whose ancestor came into England with the Conqueror, who gave him the castle of Brember, and whose descendant afterwards, by the marriage with Bertha, daughter and one of the coheirs of Milo, earl of Hereford, became possessed of the castles of Brecknock and Gower likewife, and bore for his arms, Azure, a lion rampant, between twelve cross-croslets, or; though I find by the pedigrees of this family, that his ancestors bore Azure, three bars vaire, argent, and gules. He was several times summoned to parliament in king Edward I.'s reign, as was his son of the same name, both in that and Edward II.'s reign, and died possessed of this manor in the 19th year of the latter. Very soon after which it appears, with the church appendant to it, to have come into the possession of Edmund of Woodstock, earl of Kent, half brother to king Edward II. (fn. 2) After which it descended to his brother John Plantagenet, likewife earl of Kent, it being then held of the king in sergeantry. He died anno 26 Edward III. upon which Joane his sister, commonly called the Fair Maid of Kent, wife of Sir Thomas Holand, became his heir, who in her right not only possessed this manor, but became earl of Kent likewise. She afterwards married Edward the black prince, and died in the 9th year of king Richard II. being succeeded in this manor then held in capite, by Thomas Holand, earl of Kent, her son by her first husband, whose two sons, Thomas and Edward, both earls of Kent, and the former created Duke of Surry, in turn succeeded to it, and the latter dying anno 9 Henry IV. his five sisters became his coheirs, and on a partition made between them, Edmund, earl of March, son of Eleanor, late countess of March, the eldest of them became entitled to this manor in his mother's right, being the last earl of March of this family, for he died s. p. in the 3d year of king Henry VI. being then possessed of it. The year after which, Joane, wife of Sir John Gray, appears by the escheat rolls to have been entitled to it; not long after which it became the property of the family of Tibetot, or Tiptoft, as they were usually called, in whom it continued down to John Tiptost, earl of Worcester, who was attainted and beheaded in 1471, anno 10 Edward IV. king Henry being then restored to the crown. He lest an infant son Edward, who, though he was afterwards restored in blood by king Edward IV. yet I do not find that he was ever reinstated in the possession of this manor, which remained in the crown till the reign of king Henry VIII. who granted it, with the advowson of the church, to Sir Matthew Browne, of Beechworth-castle, who in the 22d year of it, passed it away to Lucy, widow of his uncle Sir Anthony Browne, standard-bearer of England, whose grandson Anthony was, anno I and 2 of Philip and Mary, created viscount Montague, and died possessed of this manor anno 34 Elizabeth, and by his will devised it to his eldest son by his second wife, Sir George Browne, who was of Wickham Breaus, and his grandson Sir George Browne, K. B. leaving two daughters his coheirs, Winifrid, married to Basil Brooks, esq. of Salop, and Eleanor, to Henry Farmer, esq. of Oxfordshire, they joined in the sale of it, at the latter end of Charles II.'s reign, to Sir H. Palmer, bart. of Wingham, who died possessed of it in 1706, s. p. and by his will devised it to his nephew Sir Thomas Palmer, bart. who died in 1723, and by his will gave it to his natural son Herbert Palmer, esq. who married Bethia, one of the daughters of Sir Thomas D'Aeth, bart. of Knowlton, who died in 1760, s. p., having devised this manor, with the advowson of the church appendant, to his widow. She afterwards married John Cosnan, esq. who in her right became possessed of it, and died in 1778, s. p. leaving her furviving, upon which she again became entitled to the possession of it, and continued owner of it till her death in 1797, on which it came to her nephew Sir Narborough D'Aeth, bart. of Knowlton, the present owner of it. A court leet and court baron is held for this manor.

 

Trendley park, now accounted a manor of itself, is situated at the north-west boundary of this parish, being entirely separated from the rest of it by that of Littleborne intervening. It was part of the possessions of Odo, bishop of Baieux, and is noticed in the survey of Domesday, in the description of the manor of Wickham above recited, in which it is mentioned as being then a park; and it should seem that at least part of it was then accounted as appurtenant to that manor; though in the description of the manor of Littleborne, in the same survey, which then belonged to the abbey of St. Augustine, it appears that the bishop had lands belonging to that manor too lying within his park here. Of this manor the bishop of Baieux has in his park as much land as is worth sixty shillings, says the record. In part of the recompence for which, the bishop seems to have given the abbot the manor of Garwinton, in Littleborne, and other land within the manor of Leeds, as may be seen by the entries of both these manors in the same record. Soon after which there was another exchange of land made between the bishop and archbishop Lanfranc, for some which lay within his park of Wikeham. What is remarkable in this instrument is, that it is given in two languages, in Saxon and Latin, but neither is a translation of the other, for both are originals, as was a frequent custom of that time. Appendant to it is the bishop's seal in wax, representing him on one side on horseback, with his sword and spurs, as an earl, and on the other habited as a bishop, with his pastoral staff; being perhaps the only seal of Odo at this time extant. (fn. 3) By all which it appears, that this park is much more antient than that of Woodstock, which has been accounted the first inclosed park in England. How long it continued an inclosed park, I have no where found; but in the beginning of king Henry VI.'s reign it was not so, as appears by the escheat-rolls of the 3d year of it, after the death of Edmund, earl of March, at which time there were two hundred acres of wood in it. He was lord of the manor of Wickham, and Trendley park was chiefly at that time certainly appurtenant to it, and continued so whilst in the possession of the same owners, which it did most probably till the attainder of John Tiptost, earl of Worcester, in the 10th year of king Edward IV. when they both came into the hands of the crown, and though king Henry VIII. afterwards granted the manor of Wickham to Sir Matthew Browne, yet I do not find that Trendley park was granted with it. From which time it has had separate owners. For some time it has been the property of the family of Denne, who continue at this time the owners of it. It lies in an unpleasant, lonely part of the parish, facing Westbere, and consists of three hundred acres of woodland, and a house called the Park-house. There is a high road through the middle of it from Stodmarsh to Canterbury market, which in king Edward II.'s reign, was attempted to be shut up, but the sheriff, with the posse comitatus, was ordered to open it again, as being an antient and allowed high road.

 

Charities.

Andrew Holness, of Seton, in Ickham, by will in 1554, gave to the poor 2s. in money and bread, to be distributed yearly; the churchwardens to take so much yearly out of his lands in Ickham and Wickham, except his house and garden at Seton, in case his executors did not give the same yearly.

 

Henry Sloyden, of Wickham Breaus, by will in 1568, gave for the use of the poor and Littleborne, in equal portions, a piece of land containing six acres and a half in the latter parish, called Church-close, which is distributed twice a year by the respective minister and churchwardens, and is of the annual produce of 4l.

 

John Smith, rector of this parish, by deed in 1656, gave a school-room, and a house and garden for a schoolmaster, in this parish, for teaching the children of it. The master to be chosen from one of his relations in preference, if any such could be found, is vested in the rector and churchwardens of this parish.

 

Sir Henry Palmer, of Bekesborne, by his will in 1611, gave the sum of 10s. to each of the several parishes of Wickham, Stodmarsh, Littleborne, and five others therein mentioned, to be paid into the hands of the minister and churchwardens yearly, out of his manor and lands of Well-court, at Michaelmas, towards the relief of the poor of each of them.

 

Thomas Belke, D. D. rector of this parish, by will in 1712, gave 501. for the putting out of five poor children of this parish apprentices.

 

There are about thirty poor constantly relieved, and casually seventy.

 

This parish is within the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the diocese of Canterbury, and deanry of Bridge.

 

¶The church, which is dedicated to St. Andrew, consists of three isles and one chancel, having at the west end a square tower, in which hang six bells. The church is not large, but is handsome and neat. In the middle isle are several memorials for the Beakes, of Saperton. In the south isle for the Larkins, who lived at Grove, in this parish. In the east window are remains of good painted glass, viz. the arms of Edward the black price and of Mortimer, quartered with Burgh, and a representation of Herod's daughter beheading John the Baptist. In the chancel, on the pavement, is the figure of a priest in brass, and inscription, for Henry Welde, rector, obt. 1420. A gravestone, and monument for Alexander Young, B D. rector of this parish, who rebuilt this parsonage-house, and repaired that of Eastchurch, of which he was vicar likewife, at the expence of 2000l. obt. March 21, 1755. A memorial for John Smith, rector, obt. Oct. 28, 1658. In the church-yard are many headstones, and a tombstone for the family of Beake. In the windows of this church there were formerly many different shields of arms, long since demolished.

 

This church was always an appendage to the manor, and continues so at this time, Sir Narborough D' Aeth, bart. owner of the manor of Wickham, being the present patron of it.

 

There was antiently both a rectory and vicarage in this church, which continued till the year 1322, when on a vacancy of the latter, Richard de Newcastle, the rector, petitioned archbishop Walter Reynolds, that they might be consolidated, which was granted, and they have continued in that state to the present time. (fn. 4)

 

This rectory is valued in the king's books at 29l. 12s. 6d. and the yearly tenths at 2l. 19s. 3d. In 1588 it was valued at 250l. communicants one hundred and sixty-three. In 1640 the same. There are eighteen acres of glebe-land.

 

The marsh-lands in this parish, within Wickham and Preston valleys, pay a modus of two-pence an acre, and those within Newnham 1½d. only, in lieu of all tithes.

 

www.british-history.ac.uk/survey-kent/vol9/pp158-166

Water & Light at Sassi Mazar Balochistan May30, 2015

 

SUN SHINES IN THE NIGHT

Sassi punnu mausoleum got Solar Energy

Every year thousands of peoples from various parts of Sindh, Baluchistan and Punjab gather at the shrine of Sassi and Punnu in Singher village to attend a 3 days carnival. Singher village is , 52 Kilometers away from Hub town. Singher means chain, as the village is surrounded by the chain of hills where it is believed that Sassi and Punnu were buried under a landslide.

Before the monsoon a carnival organizing committee receives donation from the Baloch tribal chiefs of Sindh and Balochistan to bear the expenditures of the event. Collected funds are mostly used for providing food, water and accommodation to all the devotees there. Sufi Faqirs (singers) from Sindh, Balochistan and Punjab travel to perform songs on the occasion to pay homage to Sassi Punnu, the popular tragic romance of Sindh and Balochistan. Besides folk songs, a traditional Sindhi game malakhro similar to Japanese wrestling sumo also attracts a large number of the people to come there.

 

Lands from mountains with old graves scattered in the area and rainy water ways are quite difficult to cross for the travellers. Despite this, devotees, males and females, travel long distance to visit the site the entire year. For the local people, camel is the only means of transport and people gather there during the occasion.

 

There is only one well, which is useful for the communities otherwise the entire area underground water level is unsafe for human consumption. In case the area receives monsoon rains the people use rainy water from ponds.

 

For the benefit of peoples living in surroundings as well as devotees who visit during carnival and over the year, Masood Lohar, country Manager UNDP, GEF small grant program decided to use solar energy for providing clean and safe water and lighting on the mausoleum.

 

On 30th May 2015, Shaan Technologies Private Limited installed a 3 HP Solar Powered pump on a 250 ft deep well that is located near the tomb. Operating on a 3 kilowatt solar panel bank this pump provide 30 Gallon water per minutes & eliminates requirement of diesel generator operated pump that organizing committee previously used to supply water during the festival.

 

Now solar pump serves as a continuous source of clean water without any additional cost. A water tank is provided to store pumped water. This tank helped as a 24 hours ready source of water for the local people.

 

In addition to that 2 solar powered floodlights were also installed in front yard of tomb. These 14 watt LED lights runs on a 35 watt solar panel that provide sufficient power to run LED lamps up to 12 hours. Dusk to Dawn photo sensors is also used in the system that automatically turns on the light just before the sunset and turns off at dawn. This project was financed by the UNDP GEF Small grant program. Lodhie foundation contributed 10% cost of the project under its poverty alleviation initiative.

  

Project Summary

 

Location: Sassi Punnu Moseleum, Singher Village, Near Hub Dam, Baluchistan

Coordinates: 25°18'41"N 66°53'21"E

Nearby cities: Karachi, Hub City, Sonmiani / Winder city

Initiated By: UNDP, GEF Small Grant Program in association of Lodhie Foundation

Implemented by: Shaan Technologies Private Limited Karachi

Implantation Date: 30Th May 2015

Equipment installed:

(1) One 3HP DC Submersible water pump with 3KW Solar panels and Pump Controller

(2) Two Solar Powered LED Floodlights

Beneficiaries: Up to 2500 people living in the Singher village and surroundings

    

Folktale of Sassi & Punnu

 

Sassi Punnu is a famous folktale of love told in the length and breadth of Sindh, Pakistan. The story is about a faithful wife who is ready to undergo all kinds of troubles that would come her way while seeking her beloved husband who was separated from her by the rivals

Sassi was the daughter of a Brahman Hindu Rajah from Rohri . Upon Sassui's birth, astrologers predicted that she was a curse for the royal family’s prestige. The Raja ordered that the child be put in a wooden box and thrown in the Sindhu, present day’s river Indus. However, she was saved by a washer-man belonging to Bhanbhor, near Gharo district, Thatta . The washer-man raised her as his own daughter.

When Sassui became a young girl, she was as beautiful as the fairies of heaven. Stories of her beauty reached Punhun a prince from Kech Makran Balochistan and he became desperate to meet Sassi. The handsome young Prince therefore travelled to Bhambore. He sent his clothes to Sassi's father (a washerman) so that he could catch a glimpse of Sassi. When he visited the washerman's house, they fell in love at first sight. Sassui's father was dispirited, hoping that Sassi would marry a washerman and no one else. He asked Punnhun to prove that he was worthy of Sassui by passing the test as a washerman. Punnhun agreed to prove his love. While washing, he tore all the clothes as, being a prince, he had never washed any clothes; he thus failed the agreement. But before he returned those clothes, he hid gold coins in the pockets of all the clothes, hoping this would keep the villagers quiet. The trick worked, and Sassui's father agreed to the marriage.

At last Punnu (Punhoon) married her. However, his father, Ari, the King of Ketch, did not like his son getting married to a low-caste girl, so he instructed his other sons to go to Bhanbhor and bring back Punnu at any cost. They visited Punnu as his guests and during the night they intoxicated him and his wife. Later, they put their brother on one of the camels and left. When Sassi woke up in the morning, she was shocked to find Punnu missing and all his brothers gone. She understood their trickery. She left Bhambhor immediately to Kech Makran on foot in search of him. The Kech Makran is located along the Makran Coastal Highway in Baluchistan, Pakistan.

After crossing Pab Mountain, she reached the Harho range. She could not proceed further when her path was blocked by the Phor River. So she started retracing her steps. Soon she was accosted by a beastly goatherd who intended to molest her. Sassi prayed to God for protection. Immediately the ground below her feet started caving in like quicksand and she disappeared within seconds. Seeing the miracle, the goatherd repented sincerely, and to make amends for his misconduct, he made a grave in the site and became its custodian.

Punnu found no peace of mind at Kech. He languished and soon became an invalid. Under the circumstances, his father allowed him to return to Bhambhor.

During his return journey, Punnu happened to pass by the site where Sassi had met her death. When the goatherd came to know his story, he told him as to what had happened to Sassi. Punnu was beside himself on hearing the horrible news.

He prayed to God to unite him with Sassi. Again the ground became quicksand and he soon disappeared into the bowels of the earth. So came to an end the tragic love story of Sassi and Punnu. The legendary grave still exists in this valley.

The famous Sufi saint and poet Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai sings this historic tale in his sufi poetry “Shah jo Risalo” as an example of eternal love and union with Divine.

Sassi’s resting place is said to be about 45 miles away in the Pub range to the west of Karachi. A local man of some importance constructed a simple mausoleum in 1980 over the joint grave of Sassi and Punnu. It is often visited by tourists.

Water & Light at Sassi Mazar Balochistan May30, 2015

 

SUN SHINES IN THE NIGHT

Sassi punnu mausoleum got Solar Energy

Every year thousands of peoples from various parts of Sindh, Baluchistan and Punjab gather at the shrine of Sassi and Punnu in Singher village to attend a 3 days carnival. Singher village is , 52 Kilometers away from Hub town. Singher means chain, as the village is surrounded by the chain of hills where it is believed that Sassi and Punnu were buried under a landslide.

Before the monsoon a carnival organizing committee receives donation from the Baloch tribal chiefs of Sindh and Balochistan to bear the expenditures of the event. Collected funds are mostly used for providing food, water and accommodation to all the devotees there. Sufi Faqirs (singers) from Sindh, Balochistan and Punjab travel to perform songs on the occasion to pay homage to Sassi Punnu, the popular tragic romance of Sindh and Balochistan. Besides folk songs, a traditional Sindhi game malakhro similar to Japanese wrestling sumo also attracts a large number of the people to come there.

 

Lands from mountains with old graves scattered in the area and rainy water ways are quite difficult to cross for the travellers. Despite this, devotees, males and females, travel long distance to visit the site the entire year. For the local people, camel is the only means of transport and people gather there during the occasion.

 

There is only one well, which is useful for the communities otherwise the entire area underground water level is unsafe for human consumption. In case the area receives monsoon rains the people use rainy water from ponds.

 

For the benefit of peoples living in surroundings as well as devotees who visit during carnival and over the year, Masood Lohar, country Manager UNDP, GEF small grant program decided to use solar energy for providing clean and safe water and lighting on the mausoleum.

 

On 30th May 2015, Shaan Technologies Private Limited installed a 3 HP Solar Powered pump on a 250 ft deep well that is located near the tomb. Operating on a 3 kilowatt solar panel bank this pump provide 30 Gallon water per minutes & eliminates requirement of diesel generator operated pump that organizing committee previously used to supply water during the festival.

 

Now solar pump serves as a continuous source of clean water without any additional cost. A water tank is provided to store pumped water. This tank helped as a 24 hours ready source of water for the local people.

 

In addition to that 2 solar powered floodlights were also installed in front yard of tomb. These 14 watt LED lights runs on a 35 watt solar panel that provide sufficient power to run LED lamps up to 12 hours. Dusk to Dawn photo sensors is also used in the system that automatically turns on the light just before the sunset and turns off at dawn. This project was financed by the UNDP GEF Small grant program. Lodhie foundation contributed 10% cost of the project under its poverty alleviation initiative.

  

Project Summary

 

Location: Sassi Punnu Moseleum, Singher Village, Near Hub Dam, Baluchistan

Coordinates: 25°18'41"N 66°53'21"E

Nearby cities: Karachi, Hub City, Sonmiani / Winder city

Initiated By: UNDP, GEF Small Grant Program in association of Lodhie Foundation

Implemented by: Shaan Technologies Private Limited Karachi

Implantation Date: 30Th May 2015

Equipment installed:

(1) One 3HP DC Submersible water pump with 3KW Solar panels and Pump Controller

(2) Two Solar Powered LED Floodlights

Beneficiaries: Up to 2500 people living in the Singher village and surroundings

    

Folktale of Sassi & Punnu

 

Sassi Punnu is a famous folktale of love told in the length and breadth of Sindh, Pakistan. The story is about a faithful wife who is ready to undergo all kinds of troubles that would come her way while seeking her beloved husband who was separated from her by the rivals

Sassi was the daughter of a Brahman Hindu Rajah from Rohri . Upon Sassui's birth, astrologers predicted that she was a curse for the royal family’s prestige. The Raja ordered that the child be put in a wooden box and thrown in the Sindhu, present day’s river Indus. However, she was saved by a washer-man belonging to Bhanbhor, near Gharo district, Thatta . The washer-man raised her as his own daughter.

When Sassui became a young girl, she was as beautiful as the fairies of heaven. Stories of her beauty reached Punhun a prince from Kech Makran Balochistan and he became desperate to meet Sassi. The handsome young Prince therefore travelled to Bhambore. He sent his clothes to Sassi's father (a washerman) so that he could catch a glimpse of Sassi. When he visited the washerman's house, they fell in love at first sight. Sassui's father was dispirited, hoping that Sassi would marry a washerman and no one else. He asked Punnhun to prove that he was worthy of Sassui by passing the test as a washerman. Punnhun agreed to prove his love. While washing, he tore all the clothes as, being a prince, he had never washed any clothes; he thus failed the agreement. But before he returned those clothes, he hid gold coins in the pockets of all the clothes, hoping this would keep the villagers quiet. The trick worked, and Sassui's father agreed to the marriage.

At last Punnu (Punhoon) married her. However, his father, Ari, the King of Ketch, did not like his son getting married to a low-caste girl, so he instructed his other sons to go to Bhanbhor and bring back Punnu at any cost. They visited Punnu as his guests and during the night they intoxicated him and his wife. Later, they put their brother on one of the camels and left. When Sassi woke up in the morning, she was shocked to find Punnu missing and all his brothers gone. She understood their trickery. She left Bhambhor immediately to Kech Makran on foot in search of him. The Kech Makran is located along the Makran Coastal Highway in Baluchistan, Pakistan.

After crossing Pab Mountain, she reached the Harho range. She could not proceed further when her path was blocked by the Phor River. So she started retracing her steps. Soon she was accosted by a beastly goatherd who intended to molest her. Sassi prayed to God for protection. Immediately the ground below her feet started caving in like quicksand and she disappeared within seconds. Seeing the miracle, the goatherd repented sincerely, and to make amends for his misconduct, he made a grave in the site and became its custodian.

Punnu found no peace of mind at Kech. He languished and soon became an invalid. Under the circumstances, his father allowed him to return to Bhambhor.

During his return journey, Punnu happened to pass by the site where Sassi had met her death. When the goatherd came to know his story, he told him as to what had happened to Sassi. Punnu was beside himself on hearing the horrible news.

He prayed to God to unite him with Sassi. Again the ground became quicksand and he soon disappeared into the bowels of the earth. So came to an end the tragic love story of Sassi and Punnu. The legendary grave still exists in this valley.

The famous Sufi saint and poet Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai sings this historic tale in his sufi poetry “Shah jo Risalo” as an example of eternal love and union with Divine.

Sassi’s resting place is said to be about 45 miles away in the Pub range to the west of Karachi. A local man of some importance constructed a simple mausoleum in 1980 over the joint grave of Sassi and Punnu. It is often visited by tourists.

So I stripped her down: a messy job, but not difficult, providing you take out the centre seat and the panel underneath (which is designed to come out in 10 seconds flat), to get a bit of light on an otherwise dark subject.

 

Simply (don't you hate it when people say that? but this time it really is simple) undo the six nuts which hold the drum onto the output flange, then slacken off the hand-brake adjuster until the drum can be persuaded to come off (which may need a hide hammer), and slide the drum back to sit on the propshaft, out of our way.

 

And here's the nub of the problem (though that missing spring didn't help). The operating mechanism was well and truly clagged up with the gunge of ages. Several squirts with brake cleaner got the mess off, then Mrs W sat inside, gently operating the hand-brake, while I was underneath getting everything free, then applying a good coat of CopperSlip to the moving parts. Reassemble, making sure that all the six nuts are torqued up evenly so the drum is truly square to the flange; then adjust the shoes in the normal way.

 

The missing spring was an interesting problem, as it's very, very tight, and almost impossible to stretch up to engage, when you're lying underneath the vehicle. If you slip, you'll hit the underside very hard, probably losing a knuckle or two's worth of flesh in the process.

 

As JY used to say: this is what you do.

 

First, get a couple of pairs of safety goggles, one for you, one for your assistant: if this goes wrong, there'll be bits of broken spring flying around, which you don't want in anybody's eye. Next, take out the driver's seat cushion, and the plate underneath it. This exposes the fuel tank, but there's enough space inboard of that to drop through a loop of baler twine. (If you have a Land-Rover, it almost goes without saying that you should have yards of baler twine readily to hand.) Use about four feet, knotted securely into a loop. Engage the bottom end of the spring in its hole, then hook the top end with your dangling loop, and get an assistant standing by to haul up steadily, but really pretty hard, on the loop: stout gloves are recommended to prevent cutting the hands. This seems to be about the only reliable way to stretch the spring enough that you, underneath the vehicle, will then be able to steer the end over its upper locating hole. Your assistant above relaxes the mighty pull, and everything slips into place. Cut away the baler twine, because it's not coming out any other way.

Kilmadock Parish War Memorial, Doune

-

NN 72491 01525

-

Lettering very difficult to read, badly eroded and patches of moss(?)

There is another plaque at the side by the steps but missed it.

---

TO THE GLORY OF

GOD

AND IN MEMORY OF

THE MEN OF THE

PARISH OF KILMADOCK

WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES

FOR KING AND COUNTRY

IN THE GREAT WAR

1914 - 1919

SEE YE TO IT THAT THESE

SHALL NOT HAVE DIED IN VAIN

---

Dundee Courier - Thursday 05 June 1919

Image © D.C.Thomson & Co. Ltd. Image created courtesy of THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD.

Doune's War Memorial is to be the statue of a Highland soldier erected in front of the Public Hall gifted to the burgh by Sir A. Kay Muir, Bart., Blair Drummond.

-

Dundee Courier - Saturday 27 November 1920

Image © D.C.Thomson & Co. Ltd. Image created courtesy of THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD.

The Earl of Moray has signified his intention of subscribing £600 to the Doune War Memorial Fund.

-

Dundee Courier - Monday 31 July 1922

Image © D.C.Thomson & Co. Ltd. Image created courtesy of THE BRITISH LIBRARY BOARD.

SECRET DOUNE WAR MEMORIAL UNVEILED Versailles Peacemakers Criticised General Sir lan Hamilton, D.5.0., unveiled Saturday the war memorial erected at Doune to the memory of the 63 men of the district who lost their lives in the war.

The memorial is obelisk in character, and its graceful proportions are enhanced by its effect against the wooded background. Its outlook is towards the village, and it is complementary to the new hall opened last week, both schemes having a similar origin and purpose.

A large concourse of people attended the ceremony, the Comrades of the Great War and the Territorials being under Captain Lindsay Pullar, and members of the Voluntary Aid Detachment under Miss Stanley Rogerson. The school children joined in the procession from the Moray Park, and were marshalled behind the memorial by the headmaster, Mr P. C. Merrie. Relatives of deceased were given a place of honour, and it was observed that some the women folk and children wore the medals and decorations of their loved ones.

On the broad base and steps of the monument were gathered the Provost and members of the Town Council and Parish Council, with their wives, and prominent people of the district, including:— Lady Muir, Deanston House; Sir A. Kay Muir, Bart, of Blair Druinmond; Mrs Harry Moncreiffe, London; Mrs M'Grigor, Beechwood, Stirling; Mr and Mrs Hogg, Row House; Mrs Bruce, Bridge of Teith Cottage: Mrs Stirling. Old Newton; Mrs G. S. Mackay, Mrs Stark Christie, Mrs Ash worth, Mrs Thomson, Miss Murray Menzies; Mr and Mrs John Stroyan and Miss Stroyan, Lanrick Castle; Miss Campbell Swinton, Glenardoch; Mrs Baillie Hamilton and party; Sir William and Lady Thomson, Dunblane; Rev. J. Chalmers Peat, Rev. James Scott, Rev. James Menzies, Rev. H. B. De Montmorency, Rev. Canon Docherty: Rev. Jas. Mitchell. Norrieston; and Mrs Scrimgeour; Mr D. Y. Cameron, Kippen, and Mrs Cameron; Mr Eric Bell. Stirling, architect of the memorial, and Mrs Bell; Dr and Mrs Burn Murdoch, Gartincaber; Mr F. L. Burder, East Deanston; ex-Provost Main, Doune; Mr Robert Thomson, Broich; Mr James Paterson, Burnbank; Mr John M'Ewen, Deanston: Mr Wm. M'Carroll, Deanston: Mr William Thomson, banker, Doune: Mr John Thomson, druggist; &c.

Burn Murdoch, who presided, called upon Sir Ian Hamilton, who is a son-in-law of .Lady Muir, to unveil the memorial.

.....

Some people say that we ought to remember our deed by building something useful, something that will be improvement to the place Other people are not satisfied unless they have some beautiful and artistic object to remind them of their lost ones. Deanston and Doune have done both, and I am very glad and very proud to have been here to-day. I have now the honour of unveiling this memorial.

As the Union Jack fell from the memorial the " Last Post " was sounded, and the pipers played lament. Rev. J. Chalmers Peat offered the dedicatory prayer. An opportunity was given at this stage to the relatives and others of placing wreaths and flowers on the memorial. It was an affecting scene, and the tributes were many and of great beauty. One which was given the place of honour was from the Doune, Deanston. and Kincardine Red Cross V.A.D. Detachment, and consisted of white everlastings on a base of laurels, with a large red cross of Flanders poppies in the centre. The Provost and Town Council, and the ex-service men, also sent wreaths, and one from Sir lan and Lady Hamilton had the following:—

"The saviours come not home to-night,

Themselves they could not save."

Roll of Honour:

S.W.O. Stuart Hay Murray, Pte. James Rorie. Major Lindsay Bruce Stark Christie. Pte. Matthew Connelly, Pte. James Dick, Charles Mills, Sergt. James Bell Jackson, Corpl. John Blacklock. Corpl. Peter Campbell, L.-Corpl. Patrick Fallon. L.-Corpl. Peter Innes. L.-CorpL Duncan M'Coll, L.-Corpl. John M'Gregor, L.-Corpl. George Reilly, Ptes. James Blacklock. William Boyd, Andrew Campbell, David Campbell. Alexander Dingwell, James Galbraith. John Graham, John Hislop, Robert Holmes. James George Marshall. James Marshall, Archibald Miller William Miller, John Moffat. Malcolm M'Donald, Daniel M'Naughton, Robert M'Naughton. David M'Vey, James Salmond, James Stewart, Sergt. Michael Manning, Ptes. William M'Leod, Robert Osborne, John Piggot, Lieut. William Maxwell Robertson, Corpl. Robt. Winter, Pte. John Dickie, Lieut. George Cochrane, Ptes. James Allan. Alexander Duncan, William Watt Shields. Captain Arthur Buchanan Baillie Hamilton, Ptes. Thomas Rorie,, Morten Winter, Robert Blennie, John Robertson, Corpl. John Mackay, Ptes. David Black, Alexander Cameron, Walter Martin. Donald M'Callum, L.-Corpl Stephen Hastie, Ptes. John Davie and Roderick M'Kenzie, Captain Colin Thomas Burn Murdoch, Ptes. John Paterson Cameron, William Dow Maclaren, and Charles Murray.

---

Doune, Callander Road, War Memorial

War Memorial (Period Unassigned)

Site Name Doune, Callander Road, War Memorial

Classification War Memorial (Period Unassigned)

Canmore ID 339038

Site Number NN70SW 214

NGR NN 72481 01533

Datum OSGB36 - NGR

Permalink canmore.org.uk/site/339038

www.twitter.com/Memoire2cite -“ L’urbanisme des possibles ”Pourquoi dire des grands ensembles qu’ils sont des terres d’avenir ? www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaaQ2crb2Yoi0aqvbpHthqOowQ... Parce que la fréquentation régulière de ces quartiers m’a amené à y voir autre chose que des territoires à problèmes. Habiter les grands ensembles, c’est habiter la ville. Rarement

la ville-centre, celle du Paris haussmannien ou de la ville autrefois intra-muros, mais la ville tout

de même, un territoire souvent diffus, faible, pas toujours reconnaissable, mais où habite finalement aujourd’hui la majorité des urbains. Les grands ensembles font partie de cet assemblage d’entités autonomes, issues de conceptions rarement hasardeuses, mais pas forcément articulées les unes aux autres. Ils se distinguent du territoire urbanisé par leur masse, leur dimension,

parfois leur ordonnancement. C’est très clair quand on survole une ville depuis

un avion : les barres et les tours des grands ensembles émergent au milieu des

nappes de pavillons, des galettes commerciales et des infrastructures routières.

Pour autant, ils n’organisent ni ne structurent le territoire, comme l’espéraient

leurs concepteurs à l’origine. Ils sont juste plus grands.

Les grands ensembles appartiennent au paysage générique et banal de la banlieue.

Ils en sont même devenus des éléments constitutifs. A ce titre, les barres et les

tours nous parlent d’autre chose que d’habitat ou de difficultés sociales. Bien sûr,

ces immeubles ont tendance à accueillir une population souvent défavorisée, mal

intégrée aux réseaux de production et d’emploi. Bien sûr, les modes de vie et les

relations sociales y sont parfois plus durs et plus violents qu’ailleurs. Mais on ne

peut réduire les grands ensembles à ces difficultés. Leurs situations se rapportent

en effet à une condition beaucoup plus large qui est celle de la banlieue dans sa

globalité, soit la part majoritaire de la condition urbaine actuelle.

Intervenir dans les grands ensembles implique donc de penser aujourd’hui cette

nouvelle condition. Comme l’habiter ? Comment y développer une activité ?

Comment y affronter la précarité énergétique ? Les grands ensembles constituent

un formidable territoire pour aborder ces questions, ils disposent d’un formidable

gisement pour penser la ville de demain. Regarder un territoire, une nécéssité avant toute

transformation

6 | L’urbanisme des possibles

En 2012, le Ministère de la Culture nous a confié, à Ken Rabin et moi-même,

le commissariat et la scénographie d’une exposition itinérante de photographies

sur les grands ensembles. Cette initiative revient à Eric Langereau, directeur de

l’ESAM de Caen, l’Ecole supérieure d’art et de médias qui a accueilli l’exposition

pour la première fois.

L’exposition présente les œuvres d’une dizaine de photographes qui, de 1960

à nos jours, ont porté un regard sur les grands

ensembles. Les œuvres de ces photographes sont

riches d’émotions mais aussi d’enseignements car

la manière d’observer un site ou une situation est

absolument déterminante dans la manière de penser

leur transformation. Et le regard de ces artistesphotographes nous aide à dépasser l’héritage des

fausses représentations.

Au travers de cette exposition, nous avons essayé d’élever les grands ensembles

au rang d’objets dignes de considération. Non pas tant des objets de patrimoine

– dans le sens où il faudrait les conserver, s’interdire de les démolir – mais comme

des objets à la fois importants dans l’histoire d’après la Seconde guerre mondiale

et marquants dans le territoire. Des objets qu’il convient encore d’apprendre à

regarder. Le grand ensemble à l’origine : une promesse de modernité et de confort

Dès la fin des années 1950, la Caisse des dépôts s’impose comme le plus important

constructeur de logements en France. Son rôle est essentiel dans le développement

du modèle du grand ensemble. Chacune des opérations qu’elle livre fait l’objet

d’une mission photographique.

Essentiellement réalisées par Jean Biaugeaud, les images promotionnelles qui en

résultent témoignent de la formidable promesse de cette production à grande

échelle : un nouvel habitat égalitaire, une nouvelle organisation du territoire,

le tout soumis à un objectif essentiel, celui de résoudre la crise du logement. A

l’époque, l’enjeu, c’était d’abriter des gens qui travaillent. Ce qu’il faut retenir,

et ça me paraît extrêmement important par rapport à la situation actuelle dans

laquelle on se trouve aujourd’hui, c’est que le grand ensemble était fait pour loger

des salariés qui ne travaillaient pas sur place. Un lieu où on régénérait en quelque

sorte la force de travail. Le confort du logement participait à cette régénération.

Une vie nouvelle, une vie de pionniers

La vie collective des grands ensembles est très intense durant les premières années.

Les habitants s’engagent dans des mouvements d’éducation populaire et de

jeunesse et des associations. Beaucoup d’entre eux militent au parti communiste.

De 1959 à 1969, le photographe Jacques Windenberger habite Sarcelles. Il s’attache

alors à décrire la vie collective très intense dans cette cité encore en chantier, les

solidarités entre voisins aussi bien que les douceurs familiales.

Ses reportages décrivent avec fidélité la vie de ces pionniers qui inventent de

nouveaux modes de vie collectifs. Une vie un peu à l’écart, mais qui reste accrochée

à la société par le lien du travail.Une question identitaire

Les grands ensembles accueillent dès l’origine une importante communauté de

pieds-noirs et d’immigrés. Ce cosmopolitisme reste une caractéristique forte de

ces quartiers. Certains d’entre eux comptent aujourd’hui plus d’une trentaine de

nationalités différentes.

Né en banlieue parisienne, de père algérien et de mère française, le photographe

Bruno Boudjelal fait une série de clichés bouleversants sur le quotidien de plusieurs

générations de femmes d’origine algérienne.

A la fois journaux intimes et reportages sur les conditions de vie, ces séries

formalisent le trouble identitaire que peut ressentir la première génération des

enfants nés des grands ensembles.

Les grands ensembles se sont fondus dans le territoire

Commandées en 2010 par la Direction générale des patrimoines, les vues aériennes

de l’américain Alex MacLean témoignent de la manière dont quelques grands

ensembles emblématiques de la région parisienne perdurent.

Le photographe nous montre ici comme les barres et les tours ont perdu de leur

monumentalité. Les bâtiments, comme le sol, se sont usés. Les populations se sont

renouvelées. Les grandes dimensions de ces quartiers d’habitation, encore inédites

à l’époque de leur construction, ne se discernent plus dans l’hétérogénéité des

masses de la banlieue. De l’ambition initiale, il ne reste que le visage impersonnel

de ces innombrables fenêtres et une fascination mêlée d’inquiétude devant un

effacement si assumé de toute trace d’individualité.

De plus en plus, le grand ensemble et la ville se confondent. L’un et l’autre sont

immergés dans une urbanité spatiale et culturelle de plus en plus diffuse et

homogèneUn paysage en perpetuelle métamorphose

Le photographe Christian Siloé fonde un récit à partir des chantiers – de la

démolition à la reconstruction – d’une cité de Montereau-Fault-Yonne. On

y voit des grues héroïques déchiqueter les restes puissants de structures

d’immeubles. On y voit aussi les chantiers de pavillons qui viennent

reconquérir le paysage des barres et des tours démolies pour générer un

paysage reconnaissable de lotissement.

Les grands ensembles, ce sont des paysages en métamorphose. C’est

énorme, c’est grand, c’est solide, c’est en béton, mais c’est aussi très

fragile. On les a construit, on les a réhabilité, on les a re-réhabilité, on les

a partiellement démoli, on y a reconstruit d’autres logements, …

Cette fragilité est aujourd’hui inscrite dans le paysage et la culture de

la banlieue. Depuis les

grandes démolitions à

l’explosif des années

80-90, tout le monde

sait que les grands

ensembles sont en

sursis, qu’ils peuvent

disparaître à tout

moment.

Un univers d’idées reçues

Les œuvres de Mohamed Bourouissa rassemblent, dans des mises en

scène soigneuses, les signifiants de la culture des cités : squat de hall,

regroupement en pied d’immeubles, destruction de voiture sur parking,

affrontement entre jeunes sur trottoir...

En faisant appel au vocabulaire noble des tableaux maniéristes

(composition, lumière, pose, cadrage), l’artiste-photographe hisse

les idées reçues au rang de mythe. Parce que la banlieue et les grands

ensembles, c’est aussi ces regards, ces gestes, ces manières d’être en

groupe, ou simplement les uns avec les autres dans des espaces très petits

alors que, juste à côté, il y a des étendues immenses.

Cette chorégraphie des corps, des gestes et des regards – inquiétante pour

certains – est bien sûr liée à l’architecture des grands ensembles. On ne

peut l’ignorer lorsqu’il s’agit de penser aujourd’hui leur devenir.

Entre solitude et promiscuité

Le photographe Cyrus Cornut ne pose pas simplement son regard sur les

grands ensembles, mais sur l’ensemble de la banlieue parisienne.

Ses photographies nous montrent un rapport très particulier des indivi

-

dus aux grands espaces, à l’horizon. Les personnages paraissent petits et

isolés au milieu d’un paysage de fenêtres anonymes et de blocs gigan

-

tesques, au sein desquels on vit très près les uns des autres.

Cette disproportion entre solitude et promiscuité, ce sont bien sûr les

grands ensembles qui l’ont installé. Mais elle s’est étendu depuis à l’en

-

semble des territoires sub- et péri-urbains.

C’est extrêmement important de considérer que cette affaire des grands

ensembles ne se limite pas simplement aux périmètres dit « ZUS », qu’ils

ne se distinguent pas de ce vaste paysage qu’est devenu la ville, la ville

dès que l’on s’éloigne de son centre historique.

Que nous apprennent ces photographies ?

La promesse égalitaire qui fonde l’origine des grands ensembles a-t-elle

entièrement disparue ? L’intensité de la vie collective s’est-elle substituée

à la seule violence des rapports humains ? Peut-on réduire les barres et les

tours aux seuls stigmates du colonialisme et du communautarisme iden

-

titaire ? Ces photographies montrent que l’histoire des grands ensembles

est bien plus complexe et qu’ils disposent de bien d’autres atouts. Car le

propre des grands ensembles est qu’ils restent les héritiers de la politique

étatique, planificatrice et égalitaire des Trente Glorieuses tout en étant

devenus poreux au territoire qui les entoure. Et c’est justement ce carac

-

tère double qui fait des grands ensembles des terres d’avenir : des terres

mieux adaptées aux conditions économiques et sociétales d’aujourd’hui,

des terres également propices au renouvellement des pratiques de projet.

Le potentiel des espaces verts

Les grandes étendues des espaces verts qui caractérisent la plupart de

ces quartiers témoignent de cette ambigüité. À l’origine, les grands en

-

sembles reposaient sur un certain nombre de principes affirmés. Le pre

-

mier consistait à implanter les constructions au milieu de vastes étendues

paysagères, apportant ainsi l’air, la lumière et la nature au plus près des

logements. François Parfait, ingénieur des Ponts-et-Chaussées, avait alors

déclaré que ces espaces verts devaient relever d’un statut particulier :

celui de service public. Ce statut à part, qui ne relevait ni du domaine

public ni du domaine privé, n’a jamais vu le jour. Les espaces verts n’ont

jamais trouvé leurs usages et sont restés des lieux d’interdiction, difficiles

à gérer. Des lieux d’inquiétude mais aussi des lieux coûteux en entretien

pour les locataires, les copropriétaires et les collectivités locales.

À partir des années 1980-90, on a commencé à introduire un autre modèle

en aménageant des rues et en distinguant l’espace public de l’espace privé. De

fait, on a simplifié un certain nombre de questions posées depuis l’origine. Les

espaces verts ont été découpés en parcelles. Puis on a mis des clôtures. Et ces

espaces verts, très généreux au départ, que sont-ils devenus ? Essentiellement

des jardins de vue. On a créé des espaces verts privés, morcelés, plus petits, gérés

par les bailleurs sociaux mais toujours sans usage. On a gagné un espace public,

clairement délimité – le plus souvent, les clôtures servent davantage à délimiter

la rue qu’une entité résidentielle – mais, là encore, celui-ci a rarement trouvé

d’autres usages que ceux de la circulation et du stationnement.

Avec les opérations de rénovation urbaine, nous avons découvert que les grands

ensembles pouvaient accueillir un foncier privé, dédié à de nouveaux types

d’habitats privés, générant ainsi une certaine mixité sociale. Pour autant, les

espaces verts résidentiels sont restés des jardins de vue tandis que les espaces

publics sont demeurés des rues circulantes. Est-ce le seul avenir pour ces espaces

verts ? N’y a-t-il pas d’autres hypothèses à envisager ? En élargissant la focale,

on découvre d’autres vocations possibles. Je pense par exemple à des pratiques

solidaires et locales ou à des filières économiques courtes pouvant associer

les habitants ou les actifs logés à proximité. Car ce qui caractérise les grands

ensembles, et que l’on oublie bien souvent, c’est leur ancrage dans le territoire.

De par les liens fusionnels qu’ils entretiennent avec la banlieue, comme évoquée

plus haut. Mais aussi du fait du chômage qui touche souvent plus leurs habitants.

Car si la vocation première des grands ensembles consistait à loger une population

salariée, celle-ci est aujourd’hui d’accueillir des résidents qui font bien plus qu’y

habiter.

Les habitants ont pris de l’avance

Dans de nombreux quartiers périphériques, les habitants exploitent les espaces

libres dont ils disposent pour inventer de nouveaux usages, parfois collectives ainsi

que de nouvelles activités économiques, qualifiées le plus souvent d’informelles (à

ne pas confondre avec souterraines qui désignent le commerce de biens illicites).

C’est le cas tout particulièrement des résidents de nombreux pavillons qui ont

su exploiter les potentiels de leurs garages, de leurs jardins ou d’une partie de

leurs rez-de-chaussée. Ne peut-on imaginer un tel potentiel de « capacitation »

(empowerment) dans les espaces verts des grands ensembles ? Ces surfaces de

pleine terre qui s’étendent au pied des barres et des tours, encombrantes pour

les gestionnaires et les pouvoirs publics, ne pourraient-il pas profiter aujourd’hui

pleinement aux habitants ? Les espaces verts contribueraient alors à faire advenir

de nouvelles modalités de travail, dans l’esprit de ce que Jeremy Rifkin a appelé

la « Troisième révolution industrielle ». En ces temps incertains, où se prépare

une probable pénurie énergétique, les grands ensembles auraient alors toutes les

chances de devenir les porteurs d’une nouvelle promesse. Créer un parc d’initiatives à Toulouse

À Toulouse, dans le quartier de Bagatelle, nous travaillons sur un grand territoire

de 365 hectares, aussi grand que le centre-ville. Celui-ci est bordé par la rocade, la

Garonne et un boulevard de ceinture du centre-ville. Il comprend notamment cinq

quartiers d’habitat social : Bagatelle, La Faourette, Papus, Tabar et Bordelongue.

Sur ce projet de renouvellement urbain, nous abordons plusieurs échelles,

plusieurs temporalités. Nous élaborons un schéma directeur, aménageons un

certain nombre d’espaces publics et accompagnons, en tant qu’urbaniste-conseil,

toutes les opérations.

Ce territoire est constitué de petites « poches » de quelques centaines de logements

sociaux, de pavillons et de copropriétés construits, pour l’essentiel dans les années

1950 et 1960. Chaque « poche » s’est implantée sur une assiette foncière provenant

de la réunion de plusieurs parcelles maraîchères. On a des isolats, des sortes de

successions de petites unités placées les unes à côté des autres. Pour l’architecte

Candilis, auteur du Mirail, l’aménagement de ces quartiers juxtaposés, c’est l’antimodèle.

Est-ce que c’est l’anti-modèle ? Je n’en suis pas si sûr. Parce que la proximité

de toutes ces « poches » est d’une grande richesse. Une des choses les plus

frappantes, c’est le contraste entre les secteurs de grands ensembles et les secteurs

pavillonnaires. Bien que disposant de très vastes espaces verts, les abords des

premiers restent peu investis par les habitants tandis que les maisons débordent

d’usages économiques et associatifs.

Ce contraste nous a beaucoup interrogés. Nous pensions naïvement, avant d’explorer le site, que les secteurs pavillonnaires

n’avaient d’autres fonctions que résidentielles, que leur capacité d’évolution

restait, de fait, très limité. Nous avons découvert des quartiers très vivants, les

activités dans et aux abords des maisons ne cessant de changer, de se transformer.

Et on a commencé à imaginer des choses.

Il se trouve que ce territoire est entièrement soumis à un impératif majeur, le plan

d’exposition au bruit, celui-ci se trouvant dans l’axe des pistes de l’aéroport. La

stratégie de densification n’était donc pas de mise. Les vides n’ayant pas de valeur

foncière, ils pouvaient être mis à profit pour offrir aux habitants des avantages

comparables à ceux des pavillons.

Ainsi, plutôt que de diviser, comme ailleurs, les espaces verts, nous avons choisi

de les amplifier, de les réunir. Dans le quartier de Bagatelle en particulier, nous

avons constitué une entité large et généreuse de 4 hectares, la reconstruction

de l’offre de logements étant reportée de

part et d’autre.

Mais quelle affectation proposer à ce

parc sans alourdir encore les charges

des locataires et de la collectivité ?

Cet enjeu était d’autant plus crucial

que la proportion était d’espaces verts

était devenue, dans ce quartier, très

importante. Un calcul nous a paru éloquent. Il s’agit du nombre de mères carrés par

logement. Si on compare le quartier de Bagatelle avec le centre-ville de Toulouse,

ce ratio était multiplié par quatre.

Mais dès lors que ce parc s’ouvrait aux initiatives des habitants, ce ratio pouvait

diminuer. Au vu de ce qui se passe dans les pavillons, on n’a pas souhaité se

cantonner aux jardins familiaux ou partagés. Ce parc est devenu le parc des

possibles, un parc capable accueillir les initiatives économiques, énergétiques,

agricoles, alimentaires, culturelles, ludiques et sportives des habitants. Les

porteurs de projets disposent d’un morceau de terrain, d’une parcelle, pour une

durée déterminée. Le sol reste propriété de la collectivité, mais il devient, pour

une bonne part, autogéré.

La constitution d’une trame facilite ensuite les connexions à des systèmes de

partage et de coproduction.

Cette hypothèse n’est pas tout à fait nouvelle. Nous pensons notamment à Andrea

Branzi qui a poursuivi, depuis les utopies d’Archizoom dans les années 1960,

une réflexion sur « l’urbanisation faible ». Le dessein de la ville n’étant plus en

mesure d’être planifié, la trame constitue un système ouvert, capable de mettre

en relation des noyaux d’activités éparses, extensifs ou graduels. Nous sommes

loin du modèle de la ZAC. Parole à...

Pierre Vandenbrouck et Julia Golovanoff

Créer, par la trame urbaine, des pages de liberté

Dans le quartier de Bagatelle, il y a eu beaucoup de démolitions, qui ont eu pour

effet de créer du vide.

Nous avons commencé notre travail sur cette question.

Que pouvions nous en faire ? Que faire de tous ces petits espaces, souvent sans

affectation, sans fonction ? Résidentialiser ? Créer des jardins de copropriété ?

Plutôt que de faire des jardins de copropriété surdimensionnés, nous avons

proposé de regrouper, de rassembler tous ces fragments de terrains libres pour

faire un ensemble sur lequel on puisse imaginer des choses et créer un projet.

Nous avons saisi l’opportunité d’utiliser l’espace laissé par les démolitions pour

relier deux espaces verts existants, actuellement enclavés, pour créer un grand

parc qui ferait quatre hectares et permettrait de renouveler l’image du quartier

de Bagatelle.

Mais on ne voulait pas seulement proposer un parc, public et entièrement géré par

la collectivité où toutes les activités seraient assurées et encadrées par le service

public. On pensait qu’il y avait matière à proposer autre chose, plus adapté aux

besoins du quartier. L’idée que l’on a proposée était d’apposer sur ce grand espace

une trame, structure capable d’accueillir des espaces de liberté.

Cette trame, c’était aussi l’occasion de caractériser très fortement l’espace et

de créer une sorte de structure suffisamment forte pour qu’elle puisse, tout en

existant, accueillir une grande variété d’usages.

L’idée n’était pas d’imposer quelque chose de rigide, mais de voir toute la liberté

qu’offre une trame et tout ce qu’elle peut accueillir de différent.

Des jardins plus ouverts

Tout le parc a été divisé par cette trame, en parcelles.

Le mot parcelle nous convenait bien, parce que la parcelle, c’est la petite partie

d’un tout. Et on imagine que tout y est possible, en fait. Et puis on aimait

bien aussi le mot parcelle qui désignait au Moyen-âge un petit morceau d’une

demeure seigneuriale, mise à la disposition d’un serf, et que celui-ci cultivait,

entretenait et dont il se nourrissait. Ici, il ne s’agit pas d’un seigneur ou d’un

serf, mais d’une collectivité et d’une sorte de sous-locataire qui serait un usager

ou une association. Alors on imagine que cela pourrait s’organiser un peu comme

les jardins partagés, mais de façon plus ouverte car l’idée est que les parcelles ne

soient pas forcément des jardins. Elles peuvent être autre chose. Quoi ? On ne le sait pas, mais on se doute bien que les futurs usagers auront beaucoup d’idées

à proposer. On imagine que pour obtenir une parcelle, un habitant, un groupe

d’habitants ou une association puissent proposer un usage et que cette initiative

soit choisie pour son intérêt, pour ce qu’elle peut apporter aux habitants, pour ce

qu’elle peut apporter au quartier en général.

Tout le parc est divisé en parcelles de 200 mètres carrés, surface qui a été choisie

parce que dans 200 mètres carrés, on peut faire des choses très variées.

On ne sait pas ce qu’il y aura dans ces parcelles. On imagine. On peut imaginer

mille choses. Ces parcelles ne sont pas toutes privatisées. Il y a aussi des parcelles

publiques parce que si la ville ne gère pas tout, n’entretient pas tout, il y a aussi

l’idée que la collectivité ne se désintéresse pas de son sol. Et une part de l’espace

public doit rester porteuse de tous les usages possibles, sans appropriation possible.

Dans le cadre d’une préfiguration du futur parc, on a planté des espaces qui

permettent aussi de tester spatialement la taille des parcelles, de voir ce que

ça veut dire d’avoir des parcelles de cette surface sur ces terrains. L’idée est

qu’on prépare le futur. Les habitants, les associations peuvent commencer à se

demander : « Mais, qu’est-ce que j’aimerais faire si j’avais un sol disponible en

extérieur ? ». C’est une chose importante, car les habitants des pavillons ont un

jardin, un garage, alors que les habitants des immeubles collectifs n’ont que leurs

logements. Ils n’ont peut être jamais espéré pouvoir bénéficier d’un sol, prêté par

la collectivité.

Nous, on trace une trame qui peut accueillir les idées de tous les habitants, du

quartier comme d’ailleurs.

Car généralement plus on aménage un espace, moins on a le droit d’y faire de

choses, moins on a confiance dans l’usager et finalement tous les usages qui

s’écartent de ce qui a été prévu sont considérés comme déviants.

C’est finalement dommage de voir que la générosité des pouvoirs publics ou

l’attention portée par les concepteurs sur les espaces publics soient à ce point

réduits une fois les aménagements réalisés.

Ce parc de Toulouse avec ses parcelles, parle aussi de l’usager et de sa place dans

l’espace. Si on synthétise, dans l’histoire des parcs, on a les Tuileries où l’usager

est spectateur d’une nature mathématique, ordonnancée et parfaite. Les Buttes

Chaumont ensuite, c’est la même chose, sauf que c’est un bout de nature qui

est importé à l’intérieur de la ville. On s’isole de la ville et on admire la nature.

C’est dans le Parc de la Villette qu’on a commencé à s’asseoir dans l’herbe, ce

qui paraissait encore un sacrilège dans beaucoup de jardins parisiens. En fait, on

imagine qu’avec ces parcelles, nous allons passer à une autre phase, où on pourrait

s’emparer du sol et en faire quelque chose. Parole à...

Eric Amanou

Je vais vous raconter, comment chargé de la dimension sociale du projet, nous

avons mis en œuvre toute la dimension participative autour de ces intentions.

Au début du projet, nous avions deux intuitions. La première, celle d’un grand parc

de quatre hectares devant relier trois secteurs de Bagatelle, aujourd’hui repliés sur

eux-mêmes. Notre deuxième intuition, c’était de ne pas faire un parc d’agrément,

comme il en existe déjà à Toulouse, notamment dans le quartier voisin de La

Faourette.

On arrive avec quelques idées comme l’agriculture urbaine ou des initiatives

culturelles. On n’en sait pas plus que ça. Cela suffit pour organiser des rencontres

avec les habitants et recueillir leurs réactions.

Nous décidons d’aller vers les habitants, pas par une réunion publique, mais là où

ils sont. Et sur une semaine, on organise une quinzaine de temps de rencontres.

On discute, on demande aux bailleurs de nous organiser des rencontres en pied

d’immeuble avec des locataires, on va voir les personnes âgées, on va sur le marché,

à la brocante, à la sortie des écoles. On rencontre des jeunes enfants dans les

centres d’animation. En tout, c’est une quinzaine de rencontres, au cours desquels

on a dialogué avec 350 habitants, commerçants, associatifs qui nourrissent les

intentions du parc.

De ces libres discussions, où la tendance qui s’exprimait était un parc conciliant

fonction d’agrément, nature en ville et activités

partagées, on a réussi à dégager certains

éléments de fonctionnement et des éléments

programmatiques.

On a aussi voulu identifier les ressources dans

une logique de recensement des initiatives et des

prédispositions à venir. Sur l’idée du grand parc

on a réussi à dégager un élément-clé. Cet espace

vert, il doit finalement être le trait d’union entre trois sous-ensembles et trois

fonctionnements résidentiels. Tout ce travail et le travail sur le fonctionnement

social qui avait été mené en amont par Fanny Martel, nous a permis de tricoter et

de mieux assurer nos intentions, nos intuitions, nos éléments programmatiques.

Dans le même temps cela a permis aux concepteurs, atelier Landauer et atelier

Jours, d’y voir un peu plus clair sur cette idée de trame et de parcellaire.

Aujourd’hui on se demande aussi si ce n’est pas aussi notre métier d’aller vers les

habitants, parce que la démarche compte tout autant que ce qui va être proposé.

Le fait d’aller vers les habitants, avec nos panneaux, d’engager des discussions

libres, tout cela crée des conditions d’adhésion plus favorables.

Je voudrais maintenant aborder quatre difficultés auxquelles nous avons été

confrontées.

La première concerne la gouvernance des projets.

De telles intentions, un tel processus de projet, réinterrogent tous les métiers de

la direction de projet, chez les bailleurs et au

sein des différents services de la collectivité.

Culturellement cela suppose de sortir de toute

standardisation de l’espace public et de tous

les modèles. Cela questionne les logiques de

propriété, de fermeture, de séparation, de

distinction des fonctions... Culturellement

c’est difficile quand on n’a pas un modèle

précis à substituer à celui que l’on propose

d’abandonner.

Finalement, on propose de réfléchir et d’agir

comme des développeurs sociaux. C’est-àdire que l’initiative qui va sortir va devenir

le premier élément de projet, sur lequel on

appuiera un deuxième. Mais rien n’est connu

ni maîtrisé d’avance. C’est une logique de

développement sans outils, hors maquette financière.

Par exemple, une des difficultés qu’on avait avec ce parc, c’est un bâtiment qui

peut gêner son déploiement. On nous demande immédiatement ce qu’on va en

faire. Et on ne sait pas leur répondre. L’écrêter, le réhabiliter, le démolir ? Et les

incertitudes ne rentrent pas dans la maquette financière, il faut faire inscrire le

devenir de ce bâtiment. On l’inscrit donc, en faisant le pari que dans 3-4 ans les

lignes seront fongibles.

La deuxième limite, est celle de la participation traditionnelle, connue.

Avec ce projet, on dépasse les figures habituelles de la concertation et de la

participation, du « faire pour » ou du « faire avec ».

Sur cette logique de coproduction, de reconnaissance d’expertise et surtout

d’incitation aux initiatives, on va mobiliser une autre figure, celle du « faire par

». Il va falloir inventer d’autres figures de la concertation et de la participation.

Savoir solliciter, mobiliser un prestataire qui va animer le territoire, aller à la

rencontre et accompagner les porteurs de projets. On ne sait pas bien qui va

répondre. Mais il va falloir repousser les limites pour inventer un nouveau métier

que celui de la concertation ou de la participation.La troisième limite, c’est celle de la tranquillité publique, de la régulation de

l’espace public. Dans notre concertation et en règle générale, la question des

détournements d’usage, du non respect des espaces et des équipements et de

la dégradation volontaire bride l’imagination. Au travers de ce projet, je pense

qu’il faudra faire naître d’autres métiers de la régulation publique. Les jardins

partagés, d’une certaine manière, sont aussi des petits miracles, un peu partout

dans le pays. Partout où ils existent et où ils sont bien faits, ils sont extrêmement

respectés, y compris dans des contextes de grande tension. Les associations

gestionnaires de ces jardins-là, parce qu’ils ont d’autres modes de faire, parce qu’ils

travaillent autrement avec des habitants, parce que c’est une valorisation aussi de

la ressource, produisent des formes de respect, de régulation.

Pour obtenir une régulation de l’espace public afin que toutes ces initiatives se

fassent, il va falloir inventer des nouvelles figures de la régulation, à l’image

des gestionnaires de ces jardins partagés ou des collectifs de jeunes architectes

ou paysagistes qui fabriquent avec les publics qu’ils rencontrent et dont les

productions tiennent et sont respectées par tous, ou presque. Ces gens ont une

capacité, dans une approche nouvelle envers les habitants, dans leur aptitude à

être acceptés, à réussir là où l’action publique traditionnelle échoue.

La quatrième limite tient à notre approche républicaine. On se fixe des limites

idéologiques, républicaines. Si on n’accepte pas d’encourager « l’activité de la

débrouille », on ne voit pas comment ça va se faire. On connaît ces activités on

voit bien que ce n’est pas très légal, que la République ne peut pas cautionner ça

et doit fixer une limite. Mais a-t-on vraiment le choix ? Il y a peut-être une logique

de pragmatisme de l’action publique qui va devoir permettre de détendre un peu

ces grands principes républicains.

Un chiffre nous a vraiment surpris. Depuis que le statut existe, c’est dans le

quartier habitat social du Mirail qu’il y a le plus d’auto-entrepreneur. Cela rend

compte de la fermeture du marché traditionnel et de la capacité des gens à

entreprendre, innover, tenter des activités. Lorsqu’il y a cadre légal, les habitants

y adhérent. Mais si cela doit passer par de la « débrouille », ils iront aussi. Nous,

savons que sur ce genre de projet, il va falloir aussi qu’on repousse ces limites de

l’action publique républicaine.Histoire de projet

Fosses : le grand ensemble devient le centre-ville

Cela fait dix ans que nous travaillons sur le projet de Fosses. Nous avons développé

un projet urbain. Aujourd’hui nous avons la maîtrise d’œuvre des espaces publics

et une mission de coordination. On en est à peu près à mi-parcours.

Fosses, est une commune de 10 000 habitants dans le Val d’Oise, en limite de l’Ile

de France, bordée par les grandes plaines agricoles de l’Oise. C’est une ville qui n’a

jamais eu de centre. Une ville périurbaine qui s’est développée à partir des années

1960-70 à proximité de la gare, à plusieurs kilomètres du village d’origine. Elle

comprend des pavillons, un grand ensemble (avec son centre commercial et son

centre social), un lotissement fait de maisons en bandes dites « chalandonnettes

» (elles ont été financées dans le cadre d’une loi du ministre Albin Chalandon),

un réseau d’étroites venelles piétonnes et quelques gros équipements (gymnase,

piscine, poste).

Comme la ville disposait d’une densité plus importante au niveau du grand

ensemble, la ville y a disposé la mairie dans un bâtiment préfabriqué. Puis,

dans les années 1980-90, elle y a construit une église, une halle de marché et

quelques immeubles collectifs aux façades régionalistes. Cela forme un ensemble

très disparate, une juxtaposition de fragments urbains qui relèvent chacun d’une

conception urbaine particulière, sans aucun lien ni articulation, une juxtaposition

de machines solitaires séparées par des vides indistincts, remplis de stationnements

ou de buttes de terre.

Du fait de cette situation, le projet de renouvellement urbain qui nous a été confié

est vite devenu un projet de centre-ville. Il y avait une attente forte des habitants

dans ce sens. Les choses qui nous ont été dites, au tout début, c’était des choses

simples: « Quand on fait une photo pour un mariage, on aimerait bien que le décor

soit autre chose qu’un préfabriqué ! ». Il y avait donc un besoin de symbolique.

Mais en même temps, il y avait un paradoxe. Parce que rien ne justifiait a priori

que le quartier du Plateau, où se trouvait le grand ensemble devienne, plus qu’un

autre, le centre-ville.

C’est très particulier une ville qui se développe sans centre. Cela peut générer un

repli des habitants au sein de leurs logements ou de leurs unités de voisinage.

A Fosses, cela a généré, à l’inverse, une solidarité incroyable. Ici, tout le monde

semble se connaître et s’entraider. Durant la canicule de l’été 2003, tous les

habitants se sont organisés pour porter secours aux personnes les plus âgées ou

les plus immobiles. Et Fosses n’a pas connu le nombre de décès des autres villes

françaises. D’où provient cette fraternité ? Peut-être du fait qu’aucun habitant

n’est ici plus légitime qu’un autre. Pas d’habitant du cœur qui dédaignerait celui

de la périphérie : la ville n’a pas de centre ! Pas d’habitant plus ancien pour rejeter

le dernier arrivé : l’urbanisation y est à la fois trop improvisée et trop récente !

Toutes les étapes du projet que nous avons élaboré depuis dix ans se sont faites

avec les habitants. Chaque option a été discutée le soir, dans des ateliers urbains,

des réunions au centre social, au collège ou à la mairie. Mais aussi les samedis

matin devant le centre commercial. Les habitants ont toujours répondu présents.

La principale difficulté était d’installer une nouvelle identité urbaine sans détruire

ce qui fait, paradoxalement, la force et la spécificité de Fosses : celles d’une ville

à peu près égalitaire. Nous nous sommes dit qu’il fallait intervenir sur les vides,

les organiser sans forcément les délimiter par du plein. Parmi ces vides, il y aurait

une place. Mais une place traversée par les voies de circulation qui soit davantage

une juxtaposition de parvis qu’une place principale. Il ne s’agissait pas d’établir de

hiérarchie. Nous avons juste densifié un peu.

Ces parvis s’installent dans la continuité de l’actuelle placette du marché qui forme

une première équerre. Trois autres équerres viennent compléter ce dispositif.

Pourquoi d’autres équerres ? Par respect du déjà-là mais aussi pour faire que ce

nouveau morceau de ville fasse le lien entre ceux qui l’ont précédé. Prolonger

l’existant et non s’y substituer. Dialoguer et non ajouter un monologue de plus.

Jusqu’à présent, aucune génération n’avait cherché à poursuivre l’œuvre de la

génération précédente.

D’autres outils sont venus a posteriori. Il s’agit du poché. Si on regarde le plan de

Rome fait par Nolli au XVIIIème siècle, on voit que l’espace public, les places, ce

sont des blancs dans le « poché » noir du bâti. A Fosses, dans cette ville périurbaine,

quand on noircit sur un plan le bâti, il reste une gigantesque proportion de blanc.

Comment dès lors faire exister une place, par essence vide, au milieu du vide ? Si

on regarde d’un peu plus près ce même plan de Nolli, on voit qu’il a laissé en blanc tous les espaces accessibles au public, comme l’intérieur des églises ou de certains

palais. Ce n’est pas simplement le blanc dans le plein du bâti, c’est aussi le bâti

accessible au public. Et cela dit beaucoup de choses de la ville. Si on applique ce

principe au plan de Fosses on voit que finalement, la disparité, la difficulté de

cette ville, relève des registres d’accessibilité. Ce que le seul poché des bâtis ne dit

pas forcément. Nous avons proposé de remédier à cette difficulté en créant des

connexions avec les circulations existantes. Cela a permis de développer un vrai

réseau piéton, de renforcer cette identité piétonne très forte de la ville, issue des

conceptions urbaines des années 60-70 et qui fonctionnent aujourd’hui très bien.

Le premier bâtiment construit relève du symbolique. Il s’agit du pôle civique,

qui comprend la mairie et quelques équipements. C’est un très beau bâtiment

construit par Pierre-Louis Faloci. Il forme la deuxième équerre de la place. Ce

faisant, il introduit un phénomène inattendu, une relation très surprenante avec

les constructions existantes. Cette confrontation est très stimulante. Le vide entre

ces constructions de plusieurs âges, de plusieurs styles, apparaît d’ores et déjà

comme un lieu à investir et non plus un interstice sans valeur. Il devient porteur

de nouveaux imaginaires et, pourquoi pas, de nouvelles initiatives.

Une question reste. Dans un reportage réalisé sur la ville de Fosses par le collectif

Fusion, un jeune homme part de son regret de voir 3 des 6 tours démolis dans le

cadre de ce projet. Ces démolitions, c’était une demande de l’ANRU. « De quoi vat-on avoir l’air avec tous ces immeubles plus bas, à la même hauteur ? » s’interroget-il. On comprend vite que sa référence de ville se situe du côté des autres grands

ensembles – Sarcelles ou Garges-Lès-Gonesse – situés à proximité et que ces grands

ensembles, également sans hiérarchie, incarnent pour lui la vie métropolitaine.

Comment dès lors préserver ce qui, du grand ensemble, participe de cette identité

? C’est une vraie question pour l’avenir du renouvellement urbain. Il est clair, qu’à

Fosses, on aurait pu faire sans démolir ces trois tours…Besançon : “ un urbanisme de la vie privée”

Ce projet porte sur un grand ensemble de la banlieue de Besançon. Nous avons

fait un projet urbain qui prévoyait la réhabilitation de certaines barres et la

démolition-reconstruction de certaines autres. Nous avons ensuite réalisé, comme

architecte, une soixantaine de logements.

À Besançon, l’origine de la ville se trouve dans la boucle du Doubs. C’est une

ville magnifique, entourée par les fortifications de Vauban. Mais dès qu’on est à

l’extérieur, tout est déconnecté, avec un relief extrêmement complexe. Les zones

pavillonnaires et d’activités sont entièrement privatisés et greffé sur des voies de

desserte. Les seuls espaces qui restent complètement ouverts sont ceux des grands

ensembles. Il s’ensuit une situation très contrastée entre des secteurs qui n’offrent

aucun espace de rencontre en dehors des enclos et des secteurs très ouverts, mais

qui n’autorisent aucune liberté d’action en dehors du logement.

Il y a un très beau texte d’Émile Aillaud qui s’appelle « Un urbanisme de la vie

privée » et qui explique que ce qu’il manque aux grands ensembles ce ne sont

pas tant des espaces collectifs que des espaces où on peut être seul, où on peut

se mouvoir librement en dehors des logements. Des lieux où les enfants peuvent

construire leurs personnalités, à l’écart des groupes et de leurs familles. J’ajouterai

aujourd’hui : et où les adultes peuvent initier de nouvelles activités.

Aujourd’hui encore, on insiste beaucoup sur l’intimité du logement et les relations

de voisinage mais très peu sur cette dimension de solitude et de capacitation.

Dans ce quartier de La Bouloie, nous avons superposé à la trame ouverte du

grand ensemble une nouvelle trame plus privée. De cette superposition émerge

une diversité de lieux et de situations qui, nous l’espérons, favorisent la solitude

et l’autonomie. Cette diversité provient notamment de la manière dont nous

avons travaillé le terrain et implanté les constructions dans la pente. Les barres

n’entretenaient aucun rapport avec le sol.

Cette opération a été réalisée avec un budget extrêmement réduit. Une contrainte

intéressante qui nous a permis de

placer l’architecture ailleurs que

dans l’effet plastique et de montrer

combien les grands ensembles ne

souffrent pas tant de la monotonie de

leurs façades que de leurs difficultés

à établir une relation féconde avec

leur sol. Repenser ce rapport permet

d’offrir aux habitants la capacité de

réinventer un quotidien en dehors

de leurs logements. Châlons-en-Champagne : un grand ensemble face à

la campagne

À Châlons-en-Champagne, nous avons réalisé un projet urbain qui portait sur le

devenir du quartier Vallée-Saint-Pierre, situé en entrée de ville.

Ce qui nous a frappés, c’est le rapport qu’entretenait ce quartier avec la campagne

environnante. Campagne dont elle n’était séparée que par une voie rapide.

C’est une question vraiment intéressante que ce rapport d’échelle entre le

grand ensemble et la grande étendue de la campagne. Dans l’histoire des grands

ensembles, il y a deux grands modèles. Le modèle de l’unité de voisinage et un

autre modèle qui consiste à mettre directement en relation l’intimité du logement

avec le territoire, sans échelle intermédiaire.

C’est ce rapport là que nous avons tenté de mettre en valeur. Il se trouve qu’il y a

toute une tradition française du rapport entre l’intimité et la campagne. Il s’agit

de la tradition des Jardins à la Française. La plupart de ces jardins mettent en scène

l’horizon avec un premier plan composé, une géométrie affirmée et entièrement

maîtrisée. Ce dispositif permet, en quelque sorte, de faire entrer la campagne à

l’intérieur d’espaces plus intimes. C’est de là que nous sommes partis pour élaborer

ce projet. Nous avons établi une trame qui établit un lien avec le paysage qui se

déploie au-delà de la voie rapide.

Ce projet a été réalisé il y a quelques années mais j’y retrouve des choses qu’on

essaie de faire maintenant, de manière beaucoup plus consciente et précise,

notamment à Toulouse : l’installation d’une trame géométrique à l’intérieur de

laquelle plusieurs programmes peuvent venir s’installer. Une trame sans axe ni

hiérarchie car la ville aujourd’hui n’est plus le fait du prince. Strasbourg : accompagner le temps de l’entre deux

Nous avons réalisé une étude sur le quartier du Port du Rhin à Strasbourg. Cette

étude s’inscrivait dans le cadre d’un programme du PUCA intitulé « Qualité et sûreté

des espaces urbains ». Il s’agissait d’apporter les modifications ou les compléments

nécessaires à l’acceptation sociale d’un projet conçu par la paysagiste Marion

Talagrand, dans le cadre d’un schéma directeur élaboré par l’équipe Reichen et

Robert. Nous avons travaillé ici avec l’équipe REP (« Réussir l’espace public »), en

particulier avec Anne Wyvekens.

Le site en question accueillait, jusqu’à Schengen, le poste-frontière. Il est

aujourd’hui déserté. On y trouve aujourd’hui un ensemble de 520 logements,

une école, deux églises – une catholique, une protestante – ainsi qu’un parc

métropolitain, le parc des Deux Rives.

Le projet de développement de la ville de Strasbourg sur ces rives du Rhin

s’accompagne d’une nouvelle ligne de tramway qui va jusqu’à Kehl, en Allemagne.

C’est un projet très ambitieux, très emblématique. Il prévoit la construction de

1 500 logements, ainsi que de nombreux commerces, bureaux et équipements.

Jusqu’à présent, ce quartier était plus proche du centre de Kehl que du centre de

Strasbourg. La plupart des gens faisaient leurs courses dans la ville allemande, de

l’autre côté du Rhin, sur un axe de déplacement est-ouest. Avec l’installation d’une

esplanade nord-sud, parallèle au fleuve, autour de laquelle se déploient les îlots de

construction, c’est une nouvelle organisation qui s’installe.

De nombreux habitants ont exprimé le sentiment d’être exclus du projet.

Nous avons donc réfléchi aux moyens d’accompagner la transformation radicale du

site pour faciliter cette mutation, prévue sur quinze ans. Nos moyens restaient toutefois limités pour atteindre cet objectif. Le phasage du projet était déjà établi.

Un phasage tenait ainsi compte du calendrier prévisionnel des opérations à venir

sur les parcelles bordant l’esplanade ainsi que de l’arrivée du tramway.

Nous avons donc fait le choix de ne pas interférer dans un processus de projet déjà

largement engagé. Notre étude n’allait pas porter sur des « mesures correctives

» mais sur des compléments d’aménagements et des installations portant sur les

parties du site en attente de transformation.

Ces installations provisoires permettent d’accompagner « en douceur » les

transformations d’usage du site. L’objectif est d’intégrer les pratiques des habitants

dans ce passage progressif d’une organisation est-ouest à une organisation nordsud. Ils concernent tout à la fois des aménagements temporaires d’allées ou de

parvis, l’installation de jardins familiaux et partagés, de la mise en œuvre d’objets

évènementiels permettant de voir le site depuis un point haut et de la mise en

place de dispositifs d’information sur le projet. Ces aménagements et installations

provisoires seront remplacés, au fur et à mesure, par des aménagements plus

permanents. Une telle démarche permet d’explorer quelques leviers d’action du

côté de la transformation. En effet, le passage entre l’état existant et l’état projeté

est rarement pensé en tant que tel dans l’urbanisme courant. On privilégie les

images avant-après, sans s’inquiéter de ce qui se passe entre les deux. Ce que l’on

appelle le phasage est généralement déterminé par un ensemble de contraintes

techniques, économiques, voire politiques. Les potentiels de certains lieux,

les pratiques, parfois ténues, des habitants, échappent le plus souvent à cette

planification. Or le fait de tirer parti des situations existantes et des situations

intermédiaires qui peuvent surgir à certaines étapes de la transformation, permet

d’ouvrir le champ des possibles.

En abordant le phasage sous un angle qui ne serait plus exclusivement technique,

mais tout à la fois social, culturel et artistique, on s’offre la possibilité de générer

de nouvelles proximités, de nouveaux échanges. C’est une condition indispensable

pour permettre aux habitants de faire face aux transformations de leurs quartiers.

Mais aussi de la planète. Car les mutations en cours sont imprévisibles. Il est

nécessaire aujourd’hui d’être très attentifs aux initiatives micro-économiques

et aux évolutions imperceptibles qui font, par exemple, que l’habitat se mêle au

travail ou que les frontières s’effacent entre approvisionnement, production et

distribution.

Repères biographiques

• 1990 : Obtention de son diplôme d’architecte DPLG à l’Ecole Nationale

Supérieure d’Architecture de Nancy.

• 1996-2004 : Chercheur au Laboratoire d’histoire de l’architecture

contemporaine (LHAC) à l’Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de

Nancy.

• 2002 : Ouverture de son agence « atelier Landauer architecture +

urbanisme » dans le 14ème arrondissement de Paris.

• 2004 : Obtention de son doctorat en histoire de l’architecture à l’Université

de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.

• Depuis 2007 : Enseignant titulaire à l’Ecole d’architecture, de la ville et des

territoires à Marne-la-Vallée et chercheur à l’Observatoire de la condition

suburbaine.

• 2009 : Parution de son ouvrage « L’architecte, la ville et la sécurité » aux

éditions PUF.

• 2010 : Parution de son ouvrage « L’invention du grand ensemble » aux

éditions Picard.

• 2011 : Parution de son ouvrage, coécrit avec Dominique Lefrançois, « Emile

Aillaud, carnet d’architectes » aux éditions du Patrimoine.

• Depuis 2013 : Dirige l’Observatoire de la condition suburbaine à l’Ecole

d’architecture, de la ville et des territoires à Marne-la-Vallée.

Les grands ensembles sont des terres d’avenir ! Sans interrogation mais avec

affirmation, Paul Landauer souhaite nous montrer, à partir de son expérience,

comment les grands ensembles ont pris, depuis leur construction, toute leur place

dans la fabrique de la ville et comment ils peuvent devenir les pionniers d’une

nouvelle façon de transformer la ville.

Pour cet architecte, docteur en histoire de l’architecture, pas de rupture entre

la recherche, l’enseignement et la conception de projets urbains. De Toulouse à

Strasbourg, en passant par Fosses, Besançon, Brest, Nemours, Mourenx ou Chalonsen Champagne, il lie tous ces registres.

Au commencement de toute pratique, un regard sur les territoires mais aussi sur

les hommes et les femmes qui l’habitent... Ce regard, Paul Landauer va l’exercer sur

de nombreux territoires, comme historien, comme architecte-urbaniste, mais aussi

comme animateur d’ateliers urbains, un exercice qu’il affectionne particulièrement.

C’est cette qualité dans les expertises croisées et multiples qui le conduit à être

reconnu comme un des spécialistes des grands ensembles. C’est porté par sa

conviction que le savoir doit se transmettre, qu’il va être l’auteur de plusieurs livres

et expositions dans le domaine de l’histoire de l’habitat et de la perception des

territoires de la banlieue par les photographes.

Il s’engage également contre la place grandissante qu’a prise la sécurité dans les

projets urbains. Il s’attache, dans plusieurs ouvrages, à dénoncer les incidences des

dispositifs de contrôle, de surveillance et d’évitement dans la conception de la ville

et à revendiquer le maintien d’un espace public favorisant la rencontre et l’initiative.

Il réalise notamment une place publique – avec des bancs ! – dans le quartier réputé

insécure de Lambezellec à Brest et démontre ainsi comment l’aménagement de lieux

ouverts, sans a priori sur ce qu’ils vont accueillir, peut constituer une alternative

aux grilles et aux contrôles d’accès pour rassurer les habitants. En 2008, le Forum

français de la sécurité urbaine et l’Acsé lui décernent un prix pour cette réalisation.

Paul Landauer, c’est une manière unique de regarder la diversité des territoires,

dans leur globalité, dans leurs résonnances les uns avec les autres, mais surtout

de les interpréter avec humanisme, replaçant la question de la valorisation et de

la transformation des situations existantes comme fonction essentielle du projet.

Ni critique ni nostalgique en retraçant l’histoire des grands ensembles. Mais une

mise en perspective de tous les potentiels humains et urbains qui les composent.

Ce qu’il nous propose, c’est une autre manière de concevoir la place de l’habitant

dans la ville, pour que celui-ci soit toujours en capacité d’interaction et d’autodétermination pour faire face aux enjeux de notre époque. Urbanisme - l'Apres 1945 @ 2 millions de logements a créer en urgençe..45 pour cent du parc locatif bombardé.. « Ginny » vu par l’urbaniste Nicolas Monnot @ les grands-ensembles www.arte.tv/fr/videos/082309-000-A/ginny-vu-par-l-urbanis...

sig.ville.gouv.fr/atlas/ZUS/ La matrice des G.E. s'est développée au lendemain de la guerre, lors de la reconstruction, mais ses origines de 1930, en France (Cité de la Muette à Drancy, quartier des Gratte-ciel à Villeurbanne).Gilles Ragot, historien de l'art, maître de recherche içi www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEBfg4vXNOM …Dès la fin de la seconde guerre mondiale, Eugène Claudius-Petit, éminent ministre de la reconstruction (1948-1952) déclare qu'il faut avoir une politique de "construction et non seulement de reconstruction". Nourri des thèses du Mouvement Moderne (la Charte d'Athènes est publiée en 1943), Claudius-Petit plaide pour une politique ambitieuse de logement social qu'il ne peut dissocier d'une réforme complète de la ville traditionnelle. www.citedelarchitecture.fr/fr/video/de-la-reconstruction-... Les 30 Glorieuses . com et la carte postale.l'UNION SOCIALE POUR L HABITAT fete ses 90 ans "TOUT savoir tout voir, tout connaitre, sur le LOGEMENT SOCIAL des HLM aux HBM avec le Musée HLM" en ligne sur le WEB içi www.banquedesterritoires.fr/lunion-sociale-pour-lhabitat-... … De grandes barres d’immeubles, appelées les grands ensembles, sont le symbole de nos banlieues. Entrée Libre revient sur le phénomène de destruction de ces bâtiments qui reflètent aujourd’hui la misere www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCqHBP5SBiM

difficult reprography in progress ...

It would be easy to look at St Augustine and not see past the belltower. What belltower I hear you ask. Well, that triple candlesnuffer thing beside the stable like entrance of the porch.

 

You see, I had forgotten how fantastic St Augustine was. I was early into the church odyssey thing back in 2009, and I was new to the whole church thing.

 

Yes, it has the belltower. Yes it has that porch with those stable doors. Yes it has that wonderful cast iron font. The church is huge, and difficult for me to judge how it evolved over the centuries.

 

Let me leave it to others to describe the church:

 

-----------------------------------------------------

 

The Church of St Augustine was constructed circa 1250 on a mound to protect it from flooding, probably on the site of a Norman church. The church is entered by the fourteenth century North door with wooden gates, the upper two were stored within the church and the lower doors were topped with spikes to prevent horses jumping the gates during Divine service. There was once a mounting block outside the church however it was removed less than 50 years ago.

 

Once through the porch you enter the North Aisle, in the western end is a closed off Chapel, near to this is the mechanism for the clock which is dedicated to the men of Brookfield who lost their lives whilst serving in World War Two, and the east end, which once housed a chapel to Blessed Virgin, is now home to an organ, installed in 1969.

 

An arcade separates the North Aisle from the Nave, at the end of this at the eastern end is a corbel carved into a face. The font can be found at the western end of the nave and is one of only thirty lead fonts in the country, it is decorated with the zodiac sings and occupations of the months. The Nave and North Aisle hold box pews, and at the eastern end of the Nave is the two tier pulpit with was once three tier, this stands besides the choir pews. Within the Chancel is the alter which stands in front of the remains of an aumbry, to the south is an early piscine and a two-seated sedilia. The arcades separating the North and South Aisles have suffered severe subsidence, the result being they both lean quite obviously. It has been said by an architect that the arcades separating the Nave and South Aisle lean so much that it is beyond the theoretical point of collapse!

 

The south aisle has had its box pews removed due to a very bad case of woodworm which now leaves room for the altar from the east end of the North Aisle and now used as the War Memorial Altar. At the western end is the Tithe Pen, this housed the weights and measures from the times when the vicar was entitled to a tithe, the complete set are now shown in a glass case and are the only remaining items of this kind in Kent. The eastern end of the South Aisle has a piscine and above this is a remarkable painting, dated from the late 1200?s and repainted in the 14th century. It depicts Thomas Becket's martyrdom. Where an altar once stood near this wall painting is now a large table tomb in memory to John Plomer who was three times Mayor of Romney.

 

Beside the church is a free standing belfry, there are many theories giving the reason for the belfry to stand upon the ground, one being that it was blown down from atop the church twice during strong winds and it was decided as it was so keen to stay on the ground then that is where it will stay. The tower holds six bells, only one being original and dated from 1450, three dated 1685 and the old tenor bell also dated 1685 was cast into two smaller bells.

 

www.kenthistoryforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=4992.5;wap2

 

BROOKLAND,

 

SO called from the several brooks and waterings within the bounds of it, lies the next parish southeastward, mostly within the level of Walland Marsh, and within the jurisdiction of the justices of the county; but there are some lands, which are reputed to be within this parish, containing altogether about 124 acres, which lie in detached pieces at some distance south-eastward from the rest of it, mostly near Ivychurch, some other parishes intervening, which lands are within the level of Romney Marsh, and within the liberty and jurisdiction of the justices of it.

 

The PARISH of Brookland lies on higher ground than either Snargate or Fairfield last described, and consequently much drier. It is more sheltered with trees, and inclosed with hedges, than any of the neighbouring parishes. The village is neat and rather pleasant, considering the situation, and the houses, as well as inhabitants, of a better sort than are usually seen in the Marsh. The church stands in the middle of it. The lands towards the south are by far the most fertile, for towards Snargate they are very poor and wet, and much covered with rushes and thistles. It consists in general of marsh-land, there not being above thirty acres of land ploughed throughout the parish, which altogether contains about 1730 acres of land.

 

A fair is held here yearly on the feast of St. Peter ad Vincula, or Lammas-day, being August I, for toys and pedlary.

 

The MANORS of Fairfield, Apledore, Bilsington, and Court at Wick, extend over this parish, subordinate to which is THE MANOR OF BROOKLAND, which has long since lost even the reputation of having been a manor. It was in early times the patrimony of the family of Passele, or Pashley, as they were afterwards called, whose seat was at Evegate, in Smeeth, (fn. 1) of whom Edward de Passeley is the first that is discovered in public records to have been possessed of this manor, and this appears by the inquisition taken after his death, anno 19 Edward II. Soon after which it was alienated to Reginald de Cobham, a younger branch of the Cobhams, of Cobham, whose descendants were seated at Sterborough castle, in Surry, whence they were called Cobhams, of Sterborough, and they had afterwards summons to parliament among the barons of this realm. At length Sir Thomas Cobham died possessed of it in the 11th year of king Edward IV. leaving an only daughter and sole heir, who carried it in marriage to Sir Edward Borough, of Gainsborough, in Lincolnshire, whose son and heir Thomas was summoned to parliament as lord Burgh, or as it is usually pronounced, Borough, anno 21 king Henry VIII. and left a son and heir Thomas, lord Burgh, whose lands were disgavelled by the act anno 31 Henry VIII. His son William, lord Burgh, about the 12th year of queen Elizabeth's reign, passed it away to Eversfield, of Suffex, from whom it was alienated soon afterwards to Godfrey, of Lid, at which time this estate seems to have lost its name of having been a manor. He, before the end of that reign, sold it to Wood, by whom it was again alienated in the beginning of king James I.'s reign to Mr. John Fagge, of Rye, whose descendant John Fagge, esq. of Wiston, in Suffex, was created a baronet in 1660. He had a numerous issue, of which only three sons and two daughters survived. Of the former, Sir Robert, the eldest, was his successor in title; Charles was ancestor of the present baronet, the Rev. Sir John Fagge, of Chartham; and the third son Thomas Fagge, esq. succeeded by his father's will to this estate at Brookland. His son John Meres Fagge, esq. of Glynely, in Sussex, left surviving an only daughter Elizabeth, who on his death in 1769, entitled her husband Sir John Peachy, bart-of West Dean, in Sussex, to the possession of it. He died s. p. and she surviving him, again became entitled to it in her own right, and is at this time the present owner of it.

 

There are noparochial charities.

 

BROOKLAND is within the ECCLESIASTICAL JURISDICTION of the diocese of Canterbury, and deanry of Limne.

 

The church, which is dedicated to St. Augustine, is a very large handsome building, consisting of three isles and three chancels. The steeple stands on the north side, and at some small distance from it, in which are five bells. The church is kept exceedingly neat and clean. It is cieled throughout, and handsomely pewed. In the high chancel there is a confessionary, and a nich for holy water within the altar-rails. There are several memorials in it, but none of any account worth mentioning. At the west end is a gallery, lately erected at the charge of the parish. The font is very curious, made of cast lead, having on it two ranges of emblematical figures, twenty in each range. The steeple is framed of remarkable large timber. It is built entirely of wood, of an octagon form, perpendicular about five feet from the bottom, and from thence leffening to a spire at top, in which it has three different copartments or stories, the two uppermost larger at the bottom, and projecting over those underneath them. Although there are but five bells in it, yet it has frames for several more. The whole is much out of the perpendicular leaning towards the church. In the church-yard are several tombs and gravestones for the Reads.

 

The church of Brookland was part of the antient possessions of the monastery of St. Augustine, to which it was appropriated by pope Clement V. at the request of Ralph Bourne, the abbot of it, in king Edward II.'s reign, but the abbot declined putting the bull for this purpose in force, till a more favourable opportunity. At length John, abbot of St. Augustine, in 1347, obtained another bull from pope Clement VI for the appropriation of it, and having three years afterwards obtained the king's licence for this purpose, (fn. 2) the same was confirmed by archbishop Islip in 1359, who next year endowed the vicarage of this church by his decree, by which he assigned, with the consent of the abbot and convent, and of the vicar, of the rents and profits of the church, to John de Hoghton, priest, then admitted perpetual vicar to the vicarage of it, and canonically instituted, and to his successors in future in it, a fit portion from which they might be fitly maintained and support the undermentioned burthens. In the first place he decreed and ordained, that the religious should build on the soil of the endowment of the church, at their own costs and expences, a competent mansion, with a sufficient close and garden, for the vicar and his successors, free from all rent and secular service, to be repaired and maintained from that time by the vicar for the time being; who on the presentation of the religious to be admitted and instituted by him or his successors, into the vicarage, should likewise have the great tithes of the lands lying on the other side of le Re, towards Dover, viz. beyond the bridge called Brynsete, and towards the parish churches of Brynsete, Snaves, and Ivercherche, belonging to the church of Brokelande, and likewise the tithes arising from the sheaves of gardens or orchards dug with the foot, and also all oblations made in the church or parish, and all tithes of hay, calves, chicken, lambs, pigs, geese, hens, eggs, ducks, pidgeons, bees, honey, wax, swans, wool, milkmeats, pasture, flax, hemp, garden-herbs, apples, vetches, merchandizes, fishings, fowlings, and all manner of small tithes arising from all things whatsoever. And he taxed and estimated the said portion at the annual value of eight marcs sterling, at which sum he decreed the vicar ought to contribute in future, to the payment of the tenth and all other impositions happening, of whatsoever sort. Not intending that the vicar of this church should be entitled to, or take of the issues and rents of it, any thing further than is expressed before, but that he should undergo the burthen of officiating in the same, either by himself or some other sit priest, in divine offices, and in the finding of lights in the chancel, and of bread and wine for the celebration of masses, the washing of vestments, and the reparation of the books of the church, and should nevertheless pay the procuration due to the archbishop, on his visitation. But the rest of the burthens incumbent on the church, and no ways here expressed, should belong to the abbot and convent, &c. (fn. 3) After this, the church and advowson of the vicarage of Brookland remained part of the possessions of the above monastery till the final dissolution of it, anno 30 Henry VIII. when it was, with all its revenues, surrendered into the king's hands, where this rectory and advowson staid but a short time, for the king, by his dotation charter, settled them on his newerected dean and chapter of Canterbury, part of whose possessions they continue at this time.

 

On the abolition of deans and chapters, after the death of king Charles I. this parsonage was surveyed in 1650, when it appeared that it consisted of a close of land of one acre, on which stood the parsonage barne, and other outhouses, with the tithe of corn and other profits belonging to it, estimated coibs annis at twenty four pounds, all which were by indenture, in 1635, demised for twenty-one years, at the yearly rent of eight pounds, but were worth, over and above the said rent, sixteen pounds per annum, and that the lessee was to repair the premises, and the chancel of the parish church.

 

In 1384 this church or rectory appropriate was valued at 13l. 6s. 8d. but anno 31 Henry VIII. it was demised to ferme at only 8l. 3s. 4d. It is now demised on a beneficial lease by the dean and chapter, at the yearly rent of eight pounds to Mrs. Woodman, the present lessee of it. The vicarage of this church is valued in the king's books at 17l. 12s. 8½d. and the yearly tenths at 1l. 15s. 3¼d. In 1587 it was valued at sixty pounds, communicants one hundred and sixtysix, and in 1640 the same, and it is now of about the same value.

 

There is a modus of one shilling per acre on all the grass-lands in this parish. The vicar is entitled to all the small tithes, subject to this modus, throughout the parish, and to the tithes of corn of those lands, being one hundred and twenty-four acres, which lie in detached pieces beyond Brenset bridge, in Romney Marsh, as mentioned before, in the endowment of this vicarage.

 

www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=63502

 

A long low church with the most famous spire in Kent. This three-stage 'candle-snuffer' erection which stand son the ground instead of on a tower is the result of several enlargements of a thirteenth-century bell cage and its subsequent weatherproofing with cedar shingles. It contains a peal of six bells, the oldest of which is mid-fifteenth century in date. The spire is surmounted by a winged dragon weathervane, dating from 1797. The monster has a prominent forked tongue. The reason for the bells being hung in a cage rather than a tower is shown inside the church where the pillars of the nave have sunk into the soft ground and splayed out to north and south. The tie-beams of the roof came away from the walls and have had to be lengthened by the addition of new timber supports. The outstanding Norman font in cast lead has been fully described in Part 1. To the south of the church is a headstone incorporating the only 'Harmer Plaque' in Kent - a terracotta panel made in East Sussex where they are a common feature.

 

www.kentchurches.info/church.asp?p=Brookland

Measuring the distance to truly remote objects like galaxies, quasars, and galaxy clusters is a crucial task in astrophysics, particularly when it comes to studying the early universe, but it’s a difficult one to complete. We can only measure the distances to a few nearby objects like the Sun, planets, and some nearby stars directly. Beyond that, astronomers need to use various indirect methods; one of the most important examines Type Ia supernovae, and this is where the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope excels.

 

NGC 3810, the galaxy featured in this image, was the host of a Type Ia supernova in 2022. In early 2023, Hubble focused on this and a number of other galaxies to closely examine recent Type Ia supernovae. Type Ia supernovae are the result of a white dwarf exploding, and their peak brightness is very consistent. This attribute allows astronomers to use Type Ia supernovae to measure distances: we know how bright a Type Ia supernova should be, so we can tell how far away it must be by how dim it appears. One snag with this method is intergalactic dust. Because intergalactic dust blocks some of the supernova’s light, astronomers need to determine how much light the dust reduces to accurately measure the supernova’s brightness and calculate its distance. Hubble’s unique capabilities offer them a clever way of doing this.

 

Astronomers use Hubble to take images of the same Type Ia supernovae in ultraviolet light, which the dust almost completely blocks out, and in infrared light, which passes through dust nearly unaffected. By carefully noting how much light comes through at each wavelength, astronomers can determine how much dust lies between Hubble and the supernova, letting them confidently calibrate the relationship between a supernova’s brightness and its distance. Hubble’s unique capability to observe in ultraviolet and infrared wavelengths of light in great detail with the same instrument makes it the perfect tool for these types of observations. Indeed, some of the data used to make this beautiful image of NGC 3810 focused on its 2022 supernova. You can see it as a point of light just below the galactic nucleus.

 

There are many ways to measure cosmic distances, but Type Ia supernovae are one of the most useful and accurate tools because they are so bright. Astronomers must use other methods as well, either as an independent check against other distance measurements, or to measure at much closer or farther distances. One such method, that also works for galaxies, is comparing their rotation speed to their brightness; based on that method, NGC 3810 is about 50 million light-years from Earth.

 

For more information: science.nasa.gov/missions/hubble/hubble-measures-the-dist...

 

Text credit: European Space Agency

Image credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA, D. Sand, R. J. Foley

 

Find us on X, Instagram, Facebook and YouTube

 

Irish National Organisation of the Unemployed - Press Release:

 

Budget 2013 and unemployment

 

After much speculation Budget 2013 has finally been announced. The Budget does not do enough in two vital areas. It will make the path to work, education and training more difficult for unemployed people and will further undermine the social insurance model, a model that the Minister sees as integral to our social protection system.

 

As predicted the duration an unemployed person can stay on Jobseekers Benefit has been cut from 12 months to 9 if he or she has made over 260 PRSI contributions. Similarly, if the person has paid less than 260 contributions they will only now have an entitlement to a JB payment for 6 months. So, for example, a person who has worked for 20 years or more and whose partner is working may find themselves cut adrift from any supports from the State after nine months. Yet he or she will be unemployed, see him or herself as unemployed but they will receive no supports from the State to assist them to get back to work.

Yet the State will be taking more PRSI contributions off all workers as anyone earning over €352 per week will pay on everything after: this is a regressive step and will particularly hit low income workers.

 

Another striking feature of the budget is the cutting of supports for unemployed people undertaking further education and training. This will hit in particular young people for whom Jobseekers Allowance had been cut in the past to encourage them to take up education and training options. The rationale for offering participants a full rate was to support people to re-skill themselves, to improve their chances of securing employment. Yet the cut to the Cost of Education Allowance; the equalisation of a training allowance with a participant’s previous social welfare payment; and a maximum limit of €160 for young people will make it harder for people to go down this path as they will find it unaffordable.

 

Child Benefit has not only been cut by €10: it has also been cut from €148 for the third child to €130; and from €160 for 4th child+ to €140. The provision of additional childcare or early years supports may be of benefit to some families. However, for many families struggling on a social welfare payment or a low income job this cut in Child Benefit is further exacerbated by the cut in the Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance. This payment has been cut from €150 to €100 for children of primary age; and from €250 to €200 for children aged 12+. Yet the cost of education continues to rise. According to the last Consumer Price Index education inflation ran at 6.7% in comparison to a national average of 1.2%.

 

The INOU is acutely aware of the importance of local and community development in providing important supports and services to unemployed people including the provision of access to employment. At a time when increasing demand on the ground it is disappointing to see further expenditure cuts envisaged for these programmes.

 

On a positive note the maintenance of the basic social welfare rate, as sought by the INOU, is to be welcomed. As are the additional places in Community Employment, TUS, JobBridge: it is critical important that these supports are meaningful for participants and lead on to decent employment.

 

I have been doing the Kent church project, as I like to call it, (*checks notes) May 2009, and over the years some churches have been very difficult to see inside of. Thanks to the internet, many of those have been now covered and recorded.

 

The most recent tricky one was Bicknor.

 

Bicknor is a hamlet near to the Medway towns, up on the downs, among woods and orchards. Being remote, it has become a target for vandals and thieves, so is now kept very locked. Lat time I tired to see inside was during the recent Heritage Weekend, and the Ride and Stride list assured us that it would be manned at least.

 

A half hour trip out of my route brought me to the usual situation of the church locked up tight.

 

And then a couple of weeks back, the warden at Milstead told me there was to be a Christmas Fayre at Bicknor on the 24th. A plan was set.

 

But come half six on a Sunday morning, my enthusiasm was at a low ebb, and it would not have taken much for me not to go.

 

Whatever the outcome, there was coffee to drink, football to watch and bacon to cook first.

 

Jools went swimming, and I watched the football, not from behind the sofa as Norwich not only won but played very well indeed. A pleasant change from recent weeks, and hopefully the start of a charge up the table.

 

At nine, the football was watched, Jools came home and I cooked bacon.

 

All good.

 

And I decided we would go to Bicknor after all, and a good job we did, as we saved the fayre, partly.

 

Bicknor is a 45 minute drive away, and in dull and drizzly conditions, it wasn't a pleasant drive, but with the radio on and traffic not too bad, could have been worse. From the A249 junction, it was a ten minute drive along the narrow lanes leading to the top of the downs, then along the ridge to Bicknor, where outside the church people were putting up stalls ready for the 11 o'clock start.

 

We parked under a tree at the edge of the graveyard, I got my cameras and we went to see if the church was open. The front door wasn't, bu the vestry door was, and once through there, the nave and chancel was a scene of chaos. The lady running the event had a million things to do, chase up were three quarters of the stalls had got to, dress as a fairy and find Father Christmas his suit.

 

Not sure whether the suit was ever found!

 

We were free to take pictures, but it was clear that much work needed to be done. I was asked to light the dozens of candles round the church, I was assisted by Jools. We did the three chandeliers, and around the corbel line at just about head height.

 

I took more shots.

 

We took the step ladders out, moved the pews. And just when it looked like all was set, three mayors of neighbouring villages arrived. A forth was on his way, has car needed space to get into the small car park. All car owners were asked to move their cars. This gave us an opportunity to leave, so we said farewell to the stressed lady, and I got a kiss on the cheek!

 

Before we left, I take the role of official photographer and snap the three mayors, and we are gone.

 

Back home down the narrow lanes and down to Maidstone before turning east on the motorway to Ashford and home, listening to Desert Island Discs whilst we drove.

 

-----------------------------------------

 

A rare find in the heart of the orchards - with no village to keep it company. Entirely 19th century rebuild, by Bodley, of a medieval church, it uses clunch (local hard chalk) rather than the more usual flint in this part of Kent. A small church it may be, but it is of noble proportions, with a tall narrow chancel and splendid towering reredos. Imagine it by candlelight and you will see it as the Victorians did. It is a building of which they, and we, can be proud. Nave, north and south aisles, chancel, west tower. The church is not normally open.

 

www.kentchurches.info/church.asp?p=Bicknor

 

------------------------------------------

 

BICKNOR.

THE next parish north-westward is Bicknor, antiently written Bykenore, the south-west part of which is in the hundred of Eyhorne, and division of WestKent; and the remainder in that of Milton, and division of East Kent; but the church and village being situated in the former part of it, this parish is esteemed to be in the division of West Kent.

 

BICKNOR is an obscure remote place, lying a little more than two miles northward from the summit of the chalk hills. It lies among the woods, mostly on high ground, and though with much hill and dale, yet the former are neither so steep nor so frequent as in Wormshill, and the adjoining parishes before described. It is a very healthy situation, but the soil is very poor, consisting mostly of an unfertile red earth, much intermixed with flints. The church and adjoining village, of only five or six houses, stand on the southern side of the parish, about a mile northward from which is the hamlet of Dean-bottom; near the south-east side of the village is a large quantity of wood ground, called Bicknor-wood, besides which there are several other small parcels of wood-ground, interspersed in different parts of it, equally poor with the rest of the lands in it; in the northern part of the parish is an estate called Northwood, lately belonging to the Chambers's, of Tunstall.

 

THIS PLACE was antiently part of the possessions of a family of the same name. Sir John de Bicknor held it, as half a knight's see, in the reign of Edward I. and he, as well as Sir Thomas de Bicknor, accompanied that king to the siege of Carlaverock, in Scotland, in the 28th year of his reign, and are registered in the roll of those knights, who were made bannerets there by that prince. Their arms, being Ermine, on a chief azure, three lions rampant, argent, are still remaining on the roof of Canterbury cloysters.

 

In the 1st and 4th years of Edward II. Alexander de Bykenore, clerk, was treasurer of the exchequer in Ireland, and Thomas de Bykenore, in the 5th year of that reign, married Joane, eldest daughter and heir of Hugh de Mortimer, of Castle Richard. But before this, at the latter end of Edward I.'s reign, Bicknor was become the property of the family of Leyborne, one of whom, William de Leyborne, died possessed of it in the 3d year of Edward II. His son Thomas died in his life-time, so that his grand-daughter Juliana became his heir, and from her great inheritance was called the Infanta of Kent. She died without issue by either of her husbands, all of whom she survived, and possessed in her own right of this manor, in the 41st year of Edward III. but no one being found who could claim it as heir to her, it escheated to the crown, where it remained till the king, in his 50th year, granted it, among other premises, to the abbey of St. Mary Graces, on Tower-hill, then founded by him, by whom it was quickly afterwards demised to Sir Simon de Burley, for a term of years, which becoming forfeited by his attainder, Richard II. in his 12th and 22d years, granted and confirmed this manor to it, in pure and perpetual alms for ever.

 

This manor remained part of the possessions of the above-mentioned monastery till the dissolution of it in the 30th year of Henry VIII. when it was surrendered into the king's hands, together with all the lands and revenues belonging to it. After which, the king, in his 36th year, granted the manor of Bicknor to Christopher Sampson, who in the 2d year of Edward VI. passed it away to Sir Thomas Wyatt, and he soon afterwards alienated it to Thomas Reader, of Bredgar, yeoman, who about the latter end of queen Elizabeth's reign conveyed it to William Terry, and he in the reign of James I. partly by sale, and partly on account of alliance, settled the property of it on William Aldersey, descended of an antient family of that name, settled at Aldersey, in Cheshire. His son, Thomas Aldersey, esq. of Bredgar, gave this manor by his will to his second son Farnham Aldersey, of Maidstone, and he died possessed of it in 1686. His son, of the same name, alienated it, about the year 1718, to Charles Finch, esq. of Chatham, whose daughter and heir Rebecca carried it in marriage to Mr. Thomas Cromp, of Newnham, in Gloucestershire, who was succeeded in it by his only son, the Rev. Pierrepont Cromp, of Frinsted, and he, in 1764, sold it to Abraham Chambers, esq. of Totteridge, in Hertfordshire, who resided here for some time. He died in 1782, and by his will gave this manor, among the rest of his estates, to his three sons, Samuel, Abraham-Henry, and William, who afterwards possessed them jointly, and upon a division made of them in 1795, this manor was allotted to the youngest, William Chambers, esq. the present possessor of it. There is no court held for this manor.

 

There are no parochial charities. The poor constantly relieved are about eight; casually three.

 

BICKNOR is within the ECCLESIASTICAL JURISDICTION of the diocese of Canterbury, and deanry of Sittingborne.

 

The church, which is dedicated to St. James the Apostle, consists of a nave and two side isles, and a chancel, which is half the length of the church. The nave is double the height of the two isles. There is a low pointed steeple at the south-west corner of it.

 

It is a very antient and curious building, and appears by the short and clumsy size, and bases of the pillars, the zig-zag ornaments of their capitals, and the semi-circular plain arches in every part of it, to have been built in the time of the Saxons; indeed, the whole of it has marks of a very early period.

 

This church was antiently esteemed as an appendage to the manor of Bicknor, and as such was given, with it, by Edward III. in his 50th year, to the abbey of St. Mary Graces, on Tower-hill, where it remained till the dissolution of that monastery in the 30th year of king Henry VIII. when it became part of the possessions of the crown, as has been already related, where the patronage of it has continued to the present time.

 

This rectory is a discharged living in the king's books, of the clear yearly certified value of thirty-two pounds. In 1640 it was valued at fifty pounds. Communicants thirty-two.

 

¶The rector's house, or hovel, as it may more properly be called, is very singular and remarkably placed, for it is nothing more than a shed, built against the north side of the church, with a room projecting nearly across the isle, and under the same roof; a miserable habitation, even for the poorest cottager to dwell in. (fn. 1)

 

www.british-history.ac.uk/survey-kent/vol5/pp565-569

GB Road red right district, Delhi.

Roger was a difficult dog to get adopted. Because he was so rambunctious he got to live in a barn stall. For all intents and purposes living in a barn stall is tantamount to solitary confinement. The up side was he had a big room to live in. The down side was he really didn't get lots of human socialization. I met him when it was his turn to go in to the queue of adoptable dogs. There was a wonderful young lady helping me on this day and Roger jumped and nearly knocked out her front teeth. I bonded with him because I knew nobody would ever understand him except me. Roger has been home with me now since February and if you look through some of his pictures you can see that his mood has improved considerably. The cold blank stare in this picture is not atypical for a rescued animal.

South Uist War Memorial

-

NF 74443 28625

-

East side of A865 South East of Loch Bhornais Uarach

The inscriptions are quite weathered and some have been corrected which makes transcription difficult.

-

THE GLORIOUS

MEMORY OF THE MEN

OF SOUTH UIST

WHO LAID DOWN THEIR LIVES

IN THE GREAT WAR 1914 - 1918

-

IN THREE CONTINENTS AND IN THE DEEP THEY LIE

BUT IN OUR HEARTS THEIR DEEDS FOR EVER ARE ENSHRINED

-

EOCHAR

SGT. ARCHIBALD BOWIE 1ST CAMERONS

CPL. DONALD MORRISON 6TH CAMERONS

L/CPL. JOHN MORRISON 5TH CAMERONS

L/CPL. ANGUS JOHN MACDONALD 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. JOHN MACDONALD 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. DUNCAN MACKAY 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. DONALD MACDONALD 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. MURDO MACKAY 5TH CAMERONS

PIPER ALEXANDER MACEACHEN 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. DONALD CURRIE 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. ANGUS MACINTYRE 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. ARCHIBALD MACDONALD 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. ALEXANDER MACDONALD 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. JOHN CAMPBELL 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. ANGUS MACKAY 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. JOHN WILSON 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. ANGUS BOWIE 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. RONALD MACINTYRE 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. ALEXANDER MACDONALD 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. DONALD MACKAY 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. JOHN MACPHEE 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. jOHN MACDONALD 2ND GORDON HIGHRS.

PTE. FINLAY MACKAY 6TH CAMERONS

PTE. JAMES JOHNSTONE 49TH CAM. HIGHRS. CANADA

PTE. ROBERT MACLEAN R.A.M.C.

PTE. NEIL BOYD 2ND BATT. A & S. HIGHRS.

PTE. ANGUS NICOLSON 1/6TH DKE. OF WELLINGTON REGT.

JOHN MACEACHEN R.N.

FREDERICK MATTHEWS R.N.V.R. "INDEFATIGABLE"

SGT. JOHN MACMILLAN R.M.L.I.

PTE. RONALD WILSON R.N.D.

GERINISH

PTE. NEIL MORRISON 1ST CAMERONS

PTE. JAMES MACDONALD 5TH CAMERONS

PTE. DONALD MACKINNON 5TH CAMERONS

ANTHONY MACINNES R.N.R.T.

LOCHSKIPPORT

PTE. CHARLES MACAULAY AUSTRALIAN INF.

PTE. ANGUS DOUGLAD SEAFORTHS

ALLAN MACEACHEN R.N.R.

PTE. PETER DOUGLAS R.S.F.

-

ORMICLATE

SGT. PIPER JOHN SMITH H.L.I.

PTE. CHRISTPHR. MACINTYRE CAMERONS

PTE. DONALD A. MACKAY CAMERONS

PTE. JOHN BOWIE CAMERONS

PTE. RODERICK MACLEOD CAMERONS

FROBOST

ALEXANDER MACPHEE MER. MARINE

BORNISH

PTE. RODERICK MACDONALD SEAFHS.

A.B. JOHN MACDONALD R.N.

EAST KILBRIDE

ANGUS O'HENLY R.N.R. (T)

MURDOCH MACISAAC R.N.R. (T) (/)

ANGUS MACINTYRE R.N.R. (T) (?)

WEST KILBRIDE

PTE. PETER MORRISON CAMERONS

PTE. ANGUS MORRISON CAMERONS

PTE. ALEXANDER JOHNSTONE CAMERONS

SMERCLATE

DONALD J. MORRISON MER. MARINE

PTE. ARCHIBALD MACRAE CANADIAN SEAHS.

ARCHIBALD MACRAE R.N.R. (T)

PTE. RODERICK MACLEOD CAMERONS

PTE. ARCHIBALD MACRAE CAMERONS

PTE. ALLAN MACNEILL A.A.C.

SOUTH BOISDALE

PTE. DONALD MACPHEE CAMERONS

PETER MACINTYRE MER. MARINE

NORTH BOISDALE

PTE. MURDOCH MACDONALD H.L.I.

ANGUS O'HENLY MER. MARINE

PTE. MALCOLM O'HENLY CAMERONS

PTE. ROBERT MACINNES CAMERONS

PTE. DONALD STEELE SCOTS GUARDS

PTE. RONALD MACLENNAN SCOTS GUARD

-

STONEYBRIDGE

L/CPL. JOHN LAING CAMERONS (LVT SCOUTS)

L/CPL. SAMUEL MARTIN CAMERONS

PTE. NEIL STEELE CAMERONS

PTE. ANGUS MACISAAC CAMERONS

PTE. DONALD MACINTYRE CAMERONS

PTE. ANGUS MACDONALD CAMERONS

PTE. ALEXANDER MACDONALD CAMERONS

PTE. JOHN MACISAAC CAMERONS

LIEUT. ANDREW LAING BORDER REGT. (CANADIANS)

PERINERINE

PTE. RODERICK MACDONALD CAMERONS

SNISHVALE

L/CPL. ANGUS LAMONT SEAFORTH HRS. (LVT SCOUTS)

L/CPL. JOHN LAMONT LONDON SCOTTISH

PTE. JOHN MACDONALD CAMERONS

A.B. ANGUS MACCUISH R.N.R.

HOWBEG

PTE. RONALD JOHN MACEACHEN CAMERONS

PTE. NEIL BOVIE CAMERONS

PTE. DONALD JOHN MACDONALD CAMERONS

TPR. ANGUS GRAHAM LOVAT SCOUTS

HOWMORE

PTE. ALEXANDER MACDONALD CAMERONS

PTE. PETER MACINTYRE CAMERONS

PTE. DUNCAN DOUGLAS CAMERONS

PTE. DUGALD DOUGLAS CAMERONS

PTE. JOHN MACINTYRE H.L.I.

STILLIGARRY

PTE. JOHN ALEXANDER MACRURY CAMERONS

PTE. DONALD GRANT CAMERONS

PTE. RODERICK NORMAN CHISHOLM CAMERONS

PTE. JOHN MACINTOSH CAMERONS

SGT. DONALD MACDONALD CAMERONS

LOCHEYNORT

DONALD JOHN MACFARLANE R.N.R.

DONALD JOHN MACINTYRE MERC. MARINE

KILPHEDER

PTE. JOHN MORRISON 6TH CAMERONS

PTE. ANGUS MACINTYRE 6TH CAMERONS

PTE. JOHN MORRISON 6TH CAMERONS

PTE. ALLAN MACKAY 1ST CAMERONS

DALIBURGH

PTE. DUNCAN BLAIR 1ST CAMERONS

PTE. DONALD STEELE 1ST CAMERONS

PTE. ANGUS JOHNSTONE 1ST CAMERONS

PTE. DONALD CAMPBELL 1ST CAMERONS

GARRYHILLIE

PTE. NORMAN MACDONALD 1ST CAMERONS

PTE. MALCOLM MACDONALD 1ST CAMERONS

PTE. RODERICK MACCUISH 4TH CAMERONS

PTE. ARCHIBALD MACPHEE 5TH CAMERONS

ERISKAY

PTE. ANGUS JOHNSTONE CAMERONS

PTE. JOHN MACRURY CAMERONS

PTE. (?)JOHN MACDOUGALL MER. MARINE

PTE. (?)EDWARD JOHNSTONE MER. MARINE (?)

PTE. (?)JOHN MACKINTOSH MER. MARINE (?)

PTE. (?) KENNETH GILLIES MER. MARINE (?)

LOCHBOISDALE

PTE. ANGUS MACDONALD A.A.C.

PTE. (?)NORMAN MACDONALD R.N.R.

PTE. JOHN MACCORMICK CAMERONS

PTE. (?) PETER MACCORMICK R.N.R.

PTE. SIMON CAMPBELL LONDON SCOTS

PTE. DONALD STEELE CAMERONS

PTE. (?) DONALD J. STEELE R.N.R.

PTE. ALLAN MACQUARRIER CAMERONS

PTE. (?) JOHN STEWART R.N.R.

L/CPL. RONALD MACPHEE SEAFORTHS

PTE. PETER MACLEOD CAMERONS

PTE. HUGH MACDONALD HUSSARS

PTE. JAMES WALKER CAMERONS

SOUTH LOCHBOISDALE

DONALD JOHN MACPHEE MER. MARINE

GARRYNAMONIE

ALLAN MACDONALD MER. MARINE

---

1914 - 18

MILTON

DONALD MACNEIL MER. MARNE

PTE. NEIL MACKINNON CAMERONS

DALIBURGH

PIONEER KENNETH MACLEOD 1ST CAMERONS

GARRYHILLIE

LT. ANGUS MACDONALD NIGERIAN REGT.

EOCHAR

JAMES MACDONALD R.N.R.

EAST GERINISH

PTE. ANDREW MACINNES R.A.M.C.

---

1939 - 1945

BORNISH

PTE. DONALD A. MACPHEE 4TH CAM.

LOCHEYNORT

PTE. JOHN E. MACINTYRE 4TH CAM.

HOWBEG

PTE. EWAN J. BOWIE N.Z.A.

-

GERINISH

PTE. IAN CONNELY LOVAT SCOUTS

PTE. JOHN MACDONALD LOVAT SCOUTS

P/O NEIL MACSWEEN R.N.

EAST GERINISH

A.B. JOHN MACCEACHY M.N.

STILLIGARRY

PTE. JOHN MACDONALD 4TH CAM.

---

1939 - 1945

ERISKAY

A,B, ANGUS MACINNES M.N.

A.B. DONALD J. MACINNES M.N.

A.B. DONALD MACISAAC M.N.

A.B. MALCOLM MACKELVIE M.N.

A.B. MALCOLM MACKINNON M.N.

EAST KILBRIDE

A.B. DONALD CAMPBELL M.N.

A.B. ALLAN MACINTYRE M.N.

A.B. ALEX MACMILLAN M.N.

CAPT. DONALD MACASKILL M.N.

GARRYNAMONIE

A.B. PATRICK MACDONALD M.N.

A.B. ANGUS MACKENZIE M.N.

A.B. RODERICK MACKENZIE M.N.

NORTH GLENDALE

A.B. DOUGALD CAMPBELL M.N.

SOUTH GLENDALE

A.B. DONALD MACINNES M.N.

WEST KILBRIDE

A.B. DONALD J. MACLEAN M.N.

SOUTH BOISDALE

A.B. DONALD J. MACINNES M.N.

---

1939 - 1945

NORTH BOISDALE

SGT. JOHN MACKIGGAN 4TH CAN.

CPL. ANGUS M. PATERSON

KILPHEDAR

PIPER ANGUS MACKAY

SOUTH LOCHBOISDALE

A.B. DONALD J. MACDONALD M.N.

STROME

FLT/SGT. RONALD MACLEOD R.A.F.

NORTH BOISDALE

FLT/LT. JOHN SHEARER R.A.F.

A.B. JOHN MACLELLAN R.N.

A.B. ANGUS MACDONALD R.N.

MILTON

A.B. JOHN MACLEAN

DALIBURGH

L/CPL. JOHN A. MACLEOD 4TH CAM.

A.B. ROBERT MACLEAN M.N.

EWEN MACKENZIE C.A.

FROBOST

A.B. DONALD N. MACNEIL M.N.

ANGUS E. MACKIGGAN (?)M.N.

---

1939 - 1945

ORMACLATE

PTE. ALEXANDER CAMPBELL 4TH.

STONEYBRIDGE

FLT/LT. ARCHY MACRURA R.A.F.

CPL. ALLAN MACDONALD 4TH CAM.

PTE. JOHN CAMPBELL D.L.I.

EOCHAR

L/CPL. NEIL JOHNSTONE PARA-REG.

PTE. DUNCAN MACLEAN 1ST CAM.

PTE. DONALD J. MACCORMICK R.S.F.

LOCH CARNAN

A.B. JOHN MACINNES M.N.

-

PLAQUES ERECTED BY PARISHIONERS OF SOUTH UIST 1980.

---

Alternative Names Gerinish War Memorial

Site Type WAR MEMORIAL (20TH CENTURY)

Canmore ID 339075

Site Number NF72NW 63

NGR NF 74443 28625

Council WESTERN ISLES

Parish SOUTH UIST

Former Region WESTERN ISLES ISLANDS AREA

Former District WESTERN ISLES

Former County INVERNESS-SHIRE

-

   

Thanks to the Nailbourne project, I now understand how the communities and landscape fots in along its length, though that a bubbling noisy stream can just vanish then appear miles away is very difficult to get your head round. The Nailbourne only fully flows in very wet years, but when it does, the beds that are dry now can be several feet deep.

 

But downstream of Littlebourne, where the Nailbourne becomes the Little Stour, it is wider, about six feet wide, clogged with reeds and weeds, but also was used to power to large mills. They both stand, one between Littlebourne and Wickhambreaux, and the other in Wickhambreaux itself, though is now just a house But is a large white clapboard building, with a large wheel.

 

These days, the village looks very prosperous, all grand houses or cottage conversions.

 

From here, the Little Stour makes its way over the marshes which centuries ago was the Wantsum Channel, so Wickhambreaux was almost a seaside town.

 

------------------------------------------

 

The interior of this very pretty church is dominated by nineteenth-century work. The whole of the chancel and baptistry is lined with dark brown encaustic tiles, hiding a straightforward fourteenth-century church. The east window is an early example of American Art Nouveau in England, and dominates the entire building. It was designed by Baron Arild Rosenkrantz in 1896. Above the window are stencilled paintings of angels ascending, which can also be seen in the nave, whilst the roof there has a charming star-spangled sky. At the south-west corner is a vestry - screened off by an eighteenth-century screen which may have formed part of the refitting of the chancel paid for by Mary Young. Her monument in the chancel records that 'infirm from her youth she protracted life to the 68th year of her age'. She left £100 for wainscotting and ornamenting the chancel. The interior viewed from the east gives an unusual appearance as the aisles flank the tower (see also Sandhurst).

 

www.kentchurches.info/church.asp?p=Wickhambreaux

 

------------------------------------------

 

WICKHAM BREAUS

LIES adjoining to Littleborne north-eastward, being usally called Wickham Brook. It is likewise called Wickham by Wingham, to distinguish it from the two other parishes of the same name in this county. In Domesday it is written Wicheham, a name derived from its situation near the banks of the river, which runs close to it. There is only one borough in it, viz. the borough of Wickham, which comprehends the whole parish.

 

Wickham is a low, flat, and unpleasant situation, and lying so near the marshes cannot but be unhealthy, the land throughout it is in general good and sertile, especially near the village, where the fields are very large and level ground. The village, in number about twenty houses, stands at the south-east boundary of the parish, built round a green, over which the road leads to Ickham, having the church and court-lodge on one side, and the parsonage, a handsome brick house, on the other. At the further end of the green, the Lesser Stour crosses the road, and turns a corn-mill belonging to the manor, beyond it is only one house, called the Stone-house, being built of squared stones and slints in chequers, and by the arched windows and door-ways seems of some antiquity. The parish stretches a good distance northward, as far as Groveferry, the house of which is within it, and the greater Stour river, over a level of about 500 acres of marsh land, which extend from the river into a sinus, with a ridge of upland on each side, to within a quarter of a mile of the village. North eastward from which is the Saperton, formerly the property of the Beakes's, who resided here as early as king Henry the VIIIth.'s reign; it was sold by them to the Furneses, whence it came by marriage, with Copthall, in this parish, to the St. John's, viscounts Bolingbroke, who have lately sold it, but one of the family of Beake, many of whom lie buried in this church, now occupies it. A little beyond this is Newnham, once accounted a manor, formerly belonging to the Ropers, lords Teynham, afterwards to the Bartholomews, then to Joseph Brooke, esq. of Rochester, and now to his devisee the Rev. John Kenward Shaw Brooke, of Town-Malling.—Hence among the marshes is the hamlet of Grove, through which the road leads across them to the right over the lesser Stour, to Wingham, Ash, and the eastern parts of Kent, and to the left by Grove-ferry over the Greater Stour, to the northern part of the country and the Isle of Thanet. There is no other wood in the parish excepting Trendley park. There is no fair.

 

At the time of taking the survey of Domesday, in the year 1080, this place was part of those possessions with which that king had enriched his half-brother Odo, the great bishop of Baieux. Accordingly it is thus entered in that record, under the general title of his lands:

 

In Donamesford hundred, the bishop himself holds in demesne Wicheham. It was taxed at four sulings. The arable land is eleven carucates. In demesne there are two carucates, and thirty-six villeins, with thirty-two cottagers having nine carucates. There is a church, and one priest who gives forty shillings per annum. There is one park, and two mills of fifty shillings, and two saltpits of thirtytwo pence, and three fisheries of four shillings, and thirtytwo acres of meadow. Pasture for three hundred sheep and for thirty-one beasts. Wood for the pannage of eighty bogs. In the time of king Edward the Confessor it was worth twenty-five pounds, when he received it twenty pounds, now thirty pounds. There belong to this manor in Canterbury three plats of land paying six shillings and eight pence. Alured Biga held it of king Edward. Moreover there belongs to this manor half a suling of free land, which Sired held of Alured Biga, and Goisfrid, son of Badland, now holds it of the bishop of Baieux, and it is and was worth separately sixty shillings.

 

Four years afterwards the bishop was disgraced, and all his possessions were consiscated to the crown, of which this manor appears afterwards to have been held by the Cliffords. Walter, son of Walter de Clifford, possessed it in the reign of king John, and with Agnes de Cundy, his wife, was a good benefactor to St. Augustine's abbey, and that of St. Radigund. (fn. 1) By the marriage of Margaret, daughter and heir of Walter Clifford, with John de Brewse, it passed into that name, and William de Brewse, or de Braiosa, as they were written in Latin, was possessed of it in the 42d year of king Henry III. His descendant William de Brewse, lord of the honour of Brembre, in Sussex, and of Gower, in Wales, as he stiled himself, whose ancestor came into England with the Conqueror, who gave him the castle of Brember, and whose descendant afterwards, by the marriage with Bertha, daughter and one of the coheirs of Milo, earl of Hereford, became possessed of the castles of Brecknock and Gower likewife, and bore for his arms, Azure, a lion rampant, between twelve cross-croslets, or; though I find by the pedigrees of this family, that his ancestors bore Azure, three bars vaire, argent, and gules. He was several times summoned to parliament in king Edward I.'s reign, as was his son of the same name, both in that and Edward II.'s reign, and died possessed of this manor in the 19th year of the latter. Very soon after which it appears, with the church appendant to it, to have come into the possession of Edmund of Woodstock, earl of Kent, half brother to king Edward II. (fn. 2) After which it descended to his brother John Plantagenet, likewife earl of Kent, it being then held of the king in sergeantry. He died anno 26 Edward III. upon which Joane his sister, commonly called the Fair Maid of Kent, wife of Sir Thomas Holand, became his heir, who in her right not only possessed this manor, but became earl of Kent likewise. She afterwards married Edward the black prince, and died in the 9th year of king Richard II. being succeeded in this manor then held in capite, by Thomas Holand, earl of Kent, her son by her first husband, whose two sons, Thomas and Edward, both earls of Kent, and the former created Duke of Surry, in turn succeeded to it, and the latter dying anno 9 Henry IV. his five sisters became his coheirs, and on a partition made between them, Edmund, earl of March, son of Eleanor, late countess of March, the eldest of them became entitled to this manor in his mother's right, being the last earl of March of this family, for he died s. p. in the 3d year of king Henry VI. being then possessed of it. The year after which, Joane, wife of Sir John Gray, appears by the escheat rolls to have been entitled to it; not long after which it became the property of the family of Tibetot, or Tiptoft, as they were usually called, in whom it continued down to John Tiptost, earl of Worcester, who was attainted and beheaded in 1471, anno 10 Edward IV. king Henry being then restored to the crown. He lest an infant son Edward, who, though he was afterwards restored in blood by king Edward IV. yet I do not find that he was ever reinstated in the possession of this manor, which remained in the crown till the reign of king Henry VIII. who granted it, with the advowson of the church, to Sir Matthew Browne, of Beechworth-castle, who in the 22d year of it, passed it away to Lucy, widow of his uncle Sir Anthony Browne, standard-bearer of England, whose grandson Anthony was, anno I and 2 of Philip and Mary, created viscount Montague, and died possessed of this manor anno 34 Elizabeth, and by his will devised it to his eldest son by his second wife, Sir George Browne, who was of Wickham Breaus, and his grandson Sir George Browne, K. B. leaving two daughters his coheirs, Winifrid, married to Basil Brooks, esq. of Salop, and Eleanor, to Henry Farmer, esq. of Oxfordshire, they joined in the sale of it, at the latter end of Charles II.'s reign, to Sir H. Palmer, bart. of Wingham, who died possessed of it in 1706, s. p. and by his will devised it to his nephew Sir Thomas Palmer, bart. who died in 1723, and by his will gave it to his natural son Herbert Palmer, esq. who married Bethia, one of the daughters of Sir Thomas D'Aeth, bart. of Knowlton, who died in 1760, s. p., having devised this manor, with the advowson of the church appendant, to his widow. She afterwards married John Cosnan, esq. who in her right became possessed of it, and died in 1778, s. p. leaving her furviving, upon which she again became entitled to the possession of it, and continued owner of it till her death in 1797, on which it came to her nephew Sir Narborough D'Aeth, bart. of Knowlton, the present owner of it. A court leet and court baron is held for this manor.

 

Trendley park, now accounted a manor of itself, is situated at the north-west boundary of this parish, being entirely separated from the rest of it by that of Littleborne intervening. It was part of the possessions of Odo, bishop of Baieux, and is noticed in the survey of Domesday, in the description of the manor of Wickham above recited, in which it is mentioned as being then a park; and it should seem that at least part of it was then accounted as appurtenant to that manor; though in the description of the manor of Littleborne, in the same survey, which then belonged to the abbey of St. Augustine, it appears that the bishop had lands belonging to that manor too lying within his park here. Of this manor the bishop of Baieux has in his park as much land as is worth sixty shillings, says the record. In part of the recompence for which, the bishop seems to have given the abbot the manor of Garwinton, in Littleborne, and other land within the manor of Leeds, as may be seen by the entries of both these manors in the same record. Soon after which there was another exchange of land made between the bishop and archbishop Lanfranc, for some which lay within his park of Wikeham. What is remarkable in this instrument is, that it is given in two languages, in Saxon and Latin, but neither is a translation of the other, for both are originals, as was a frequent custom of that time. Appendant to it is the bishop's seal in wax, representing him on one side on horseback, with his sword and spurs, as an earl, and on the other habited as a bishop, with his pastoral staff; being perhaps the only seal of Odo at this time extant. (fn. 3) By all which it appears, that this park is much more antient than that of Woodstock, which has been accounted the first inclosed park in England. How long it continued an inclosed park, I have no where found; but in the beginning of king Henry VI.'s reign it was not so, as appears by the escheat-rolls of the 3d year of it, after the death of Edmund, earl of March, at which time there were two hundred acres of wood in it. He was lord of the manor of Wickham, and Trendley park was chiefly at that time certainly appurtenant to it, and continued so whilst in the possession of the same owners, which it did most probably till the attainder of John Tiptost, earl of Worcester, in the 10th year of king Edward IV. when they both came into the hands of the crown, and though king Henry VIII. afterwards granted the manor of Wickham to Sir Matthew Browne, yet I do not find that Trendley park was granted with it. From which time it has had separate owners. For some time it has been the property of the family of Denne, who continue at this time the owners of it. It lies in an unpleasant, lonely part of the parish, facing Westbere, and consists of three hundred acres of woodland, and a house called the Park-house. There is a high road through the middle of it from Stodmarsh to Canterbury market, which in king Edward II.'s reign, was attempted to be shut up, but the sheriff, with the posse comitatus, was ordered to open it again, as being an antient and allowed high road.

 

Charities.

Andrew Holness, of Seton, in Ickham, by will in 1554, gave to the poor 2s. in money and bread, to be distributed yearly; the churchwardens to take so much yearly out of his lands in Ickham and Wickham, except his house and garden at Seton, in case his executors did not give the same yearly.

 

Henry Sloyden, of Wickham Breaus, by will in 1568, gave for the use of the poor and Littleborne, in equal portions, a piece of land containing six acres and a half in the latter parish, called Church-close, which is distributed twice a year by the respective minister and churchwardens, and is of the annual produce of 4l.

 

John Smith, rector of this parish, by deed in 1656, gave a school-room, and a house and garden for a schoolmaster, in this parish, for teaching the children of it. The master to be chosen from one of his relations in preference, if any such could be found, is vested in the rector and churchwardens of this parish.

 

Sir Henry Palmer, of Bekesborne, by his will in 1611, gave the sum of 10s. to each of the several parishes of Wickham, Stodmarsh, Littleborne, and five others therein mentioned, to be paid into the hands of the minister and churchwardens yearly, out of his manor and lands of Well-court, at Michaelmas, towards the relief of the poor of each of them.

 

Thomas Belke, D. D. rector of this parish, by will in 1712, gave 501. for the putting out of five poor children of this parish apprentices.

 

There are about thirty poor constantly relieved, and casually seventy.

 

This parish is within the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the diocese of Canterbury, and deanry of Bridge.

 

¶The church, which is dedicated to St. Andrew, consists of three isles and one chancel, having at the west end a square tower, in which hang six bells. The church is not large, but is handsome and neat. In the middle isle are several memorials for the Beakes, of Saperton. In the south isle for the Larkins, who lived at Grove, in this parish. In the east window are remains of good painted glass, viz. the arms of Edward the black price and of Mortimer, quartered with Burgh, and a representation of Herod's daughter beheading John the Baptist. In the chancel, on the pavement, is the figure of a priest in brass, and inscription, for Henry Welde, rector, obt. 1420. A gravestone, and monument for Alexander Young, B D. rector of this parish, who rebuilt this parsonage-house, and repaired that of Eastchurch, of which he was vicar likewife, at the expence of 2000l. obt. March 21, 1755. A memorial for John Smith, rector, obt. Oct. 28, 1658. In the church-yard are many headstones, and a tombstone for the family of Beake. In the windows of this church there were formerly many different shields of arms, long since demolished.

 

This church was always an appendage to the manor, and continues so at this time, Sir Narborough D' Aeth, bart. owner of the manor of Wickham, being the present patron of it.

 

There was antiently both a rectory and vicarage in this church, which continued till the year 1322, when on a vacancy of the latter, Richard de Newcastle, the rector, petitioned archbishop Walter Reynolds, that they might be consolidated, which was granted, and they have continued in that state to the present time. (fn. 4)

 

This rectory is valued in the king's books at 29l. 12s. 6d. and the yearly tenths at 2l. 19s. 3d. In 1588 it was valued at 250l. communicants one hundred and sixty-three. In 1640 the same. There are eighteen acres of glebe-land.

 

The marsh-lands in this parish, within Wickham and Preston valleys, pay a modus of two-pence an acre, and those within Newnham 1½d. only, in lieu of all tithes.

 

www.british-history.ac.uk/survey-kent/vol9/pp158-166

Honey trying to catch some zzz's....Who's more sleep deprived? Honey or the one taking the picture

We're back at the Monaco Ballroom on Friday December 12th for the final show of 2008!! Make sure you make it to see how the year's feuds end at this season ending super show - GPW: "Christmas Crunch"

 

We promise we wont crunch your credit.... we'll only crunch your Christmas!!

 

GPW Heavyweight Title Match

Bubblegum © vs. Dirk Feelgood

 

Just a few months ago you'd be forgiven for taking a double take at this match. The friendship between the two former friends totally imploded with the desire to become Heavyweight champion. Refusing to accept the demise of his friendship with Dirk Feelgood, Bubblegum spent months in turmoil not wanting to retaliate to the cutting comments and brutal attacks levelled his way by former friend and champion Feelgood. As time went by however, Bubblegum eventually unloaded on Feelgood but this will be the first time the two have ever come face to face in a one on one match. And to make things just a little more interesting... it's for the GPW Heavyweight Title. Can the fairytale championship reign continue for Bubblegum, or can Dirk shatter his dreams and become the first ever 2 time Heavyweight Champ?

 

Tag Team Special, Skeletor vs. Stella

Lethal Dose vs. Voodoo & "Sober" Mike Holmes

 

Alan Alan Alan Tasker's henchmen, Lethal Dose march into battle against former stable member Mike Holmes and the man they hold responsible for Holmes' new found sobriety - Voodoo. Cyanide and Toxic hope to tempt Holmes back over to the stable that two months ago he turned his back on. They want to snap him out of the spell they accuse Voodoo of putting him under. However, Holmes seems very happy with his new outlook on life and he and Voodoo look to send Lethal Dose packing in this tag team special. Lethal Dose have warned they will not be coming to the ring alone though, with them along with their attorney and law - Alan Alan Alan Tasker will be a 12 pack of Stella. Hoping the case of beer will prove to be a bigger demon to Holmes than the tag team itself. To fend off the 12 pack, Holmes and Voodoo will have Vooodoo's trusty skull, Skeletor in their corner. An unpredictable tag team match. Can MIke Holmes stay sober? Will Voodoo's spells work? Or will Lethal Dose deliver a beating big enough to break Voodoo's spell?

 

GPW British Title Match

Jak Dominotrescu vs. "Super" Sam Bailey

 

After pinning the British Champion last month in a tag team match, WKD's "Super" Sam Bailey has earned himself a title shot at GPW: "Christmas Crunch". Bailey, already a former tag team champion looks to add to his growing reputation by capturing his first ever singles gold in GPW. While reigning champion, Romanian Jak Domitrescu along with his cohorts - The Eastern Bloc look to make life as difficult as possible for the energetic live wire. Domitrescu has held onto the title since April this year with help from his fellow countrymen, but are his days numbered as champ? He surely wont be alone in this title outing and will have the Eastern Bloc close by, but can "Super" Sam Bailey overcome the odds to win his first singles gold in GPW?

 

And, the main event for the evening is...

 

GPW Tag Team Title 2/3 Falls Match

MIl-Anfield Connection © vs. Young Offenders

 

The heat just got turned up in this feud. The re-united Young Offenders have the most established tag team in GPW - The Mil-Anfield Connection firmly in their sights and not to mention the tag team trophy. These two teams met in September this year where there was no clear winner decided after the match ended in a draw. There will be NO excuses this time to not find a winner. This, for the first time in our history will be a 2/3 Falls Match for the tag team titles. A winner HAS to be decided, but who will it be? A truley epic encounter is in our midst as Jiggy Walker & "The Model" Danny Hope try to cling onto the championship that has defined them as a team and "Dangerous" Damon Leigh & Joey Hayes, The Young Offenders chase the title that one of the most popular tag teams in Europe have never held. Can the re-united friends overcome the well established unit that is The Mil-Anfield Connection? Or can the well oiled duo of the Mil-Anfield do what they've been doing all year and win again?

 

GPW British Title No.1 Contenders Match

Harry Doogle vs. Juice vs. Dylan Roberts vs. Chris Echo

 

After an eye catchingly good year from rookie Dylan Roberts, he has been included in this battle to earn a shot at the British Title. With a burning desire to win and the fans firmly behind him, Roberts could well mark his arrival onto the main roster by becoming the No.1 Contender and going for gold here. However, his opponents wont give him an easy ride. In a wonderful CC-08 tournament, no one impressed more than WKD's Chris Echo. Echo reached the CC-08 finals with two broken wrists and proved he is ready to take a step up. His previous attempts for British gold have been thwarted by the foreign legion numbers of the Eastern Bloc, is he ready to prove again that he is worthy of being No.1 Contender and finally lift the British title? Juice, the current CC8 champion has been as impressive as ever in singles competition this year, but can he compete in this match with 3 others all vying to be No.1 Contender? Also replacing Jervis Cottonbelly due to injury is Harry Doogle as a last minute entry could one half of the next gen score the upset win? , but with so many possible outcomes who will leave with the plaudits and go on to challenge for the British Title next year?

 

Lumberjack Match

Si Valour vs. Heresy

 

A violent and personal feud that has lasted all year long finally comes to a head in what promises to be a violent Lumberjack Match. Ever since brutalising Valour and cutting off all his hair, Heresy has, in some form or other dodged the challenge of Valour. Heresy claimed not to have lost his bottle or be running scared of the 2007 Break Out Star, yet during their Bull Rope clash at GPW: "V" where the two were tied to one another, Heresy still managed to find a way of escaping and creating distance between him and Valour. This time, in a special Lumberjack Match, no matter where either man go - there will be no escape. All lumberjacks will be at the ready to ensure neither man can escape the others clutches and a clear winner, one way or the other will HAVE to be decided. There will be nowhere to run to and nowhere to hide, no matter where they look. Heresy has been one step ahead of Valour all year, is this where he runs out of excuses, or can the master manipulator manipulate another win?

  

This is a difficult note to write. We received a letter today from an attorney in California. In the letter the attorney accused us of trademark infringement because our business name (which is fully registered and licensed by the way) is too close to another cake business in California. The letter goes on to state that they are about to sue us for trademark infringement!! We have had this business name for 3 years, they for 4 years. The really ridiculous part is our name is Dragonfly Custom Cakes and of course we actually make cakes and their name is Dragonfly Cakes and well, they do not make cakes but rather make ONLY petit fours. We do not make petit fours.

 

I think what really bothers me is that if they would have just sent me an email about their w orries, I would have simply changed our name. I would NEVER want to infringe on ANYONE's business. I have worked SO hard to build my business as all of you have so I fully understand that if my business is hurting someone - that is horrible and I would want to stop it as fast as I possibly could. I still do not understand how I am hurting their business since I am in Georgia and they are in California and we do not even do the same things! Since we started our business we have had photos stolen, wording from our website stolen and other things. Never once did I threaten anyone with legal action. I always just send them an email and ask that they either remove the pictures/wording or credit them to us.

 

It amazes me how awful people can be and how frivilous our legal system is and finally how bloodsucking SOME people can be.

 

They have given us 60 days to completely change our name and all of our stock. We have, as you can imagine, an immense amount of items that are marked with our logo, name, etc. 60 days is NOTHING and it is ridiculous and heartbreaking.

 

I even have to change the watermarks on all of my old pictures.

 

Whatever happened to NICE and UNDERSTANDING people? Are we all money hungry people who have turned into some kind of monsters that have forgotten why we do confectionary arts in the first place??

 

I am going to change the name and I know that my customers will be loyal. With prayer we will get through it but it is difficult to not be angry.

Difficult area. But let's fix it.

weekly i bake a couple of loaves of cake/bread and take one in to the agency for which i volunteer so the clients and volunteers can have something to eat. the other i get to keep and eat and share with neighbours and friends, which explains the missing slices above. on the left is the donated bread, a standard banana loaf, though spiced with garam masala.

 

on the right is the experiment. the recipe is nearly the same as the other, but i replaced one of the bananas with a mashed peach and used only a little cinnamon and nutmeg since i browned the butter with a handful of cardamom pods (pods saved and put in the freezer to cook with rice later), adding a good heaping spoonful of ground cardamom (which is difficult to reduce finely, even with a spice grinder). the sugar is mostly vanilla sugar, and i've reduced it further to just over half a cup per loaf. the experiment turned out nicely, if a bit damp due to the peaches.

 

and, more news of the stupid.

SAR teams on a trip in north Iceland

Part of the park photos. I broke all the rules of "no pets" and "stay on the paths".

 

I put Mordechai on a fallen tree and was suprised that he didn't fall off! He actually walked across pretty quickly (which was very difficult to take a stationary photo!) to another tree. He was enjoying himself outside.

 

Although he's a bit premature for matching the snowy surrounding...

We're back at the Monaco Ballroom on Friday December 12th for the final show of 2008!! Make sure you make it to see how the year's feuds end at this season ending super show - GPW: "Christmas Crunch"

 

We promise we wont crunch your credit.... we'll only crunch your Christmas!!

 

GPW Heavyweight Title Match

Bubblegum © vs. Dirk Feelgood

 

Just a few months ago you'd be forgiven for taking a double take at this match. The friendship between the two former friends totally imploded with the desire to become Heavyweight champion. Refusing to accept the demise of his friendship with Dirk Feelgood, Bubblegum spent months in turmoil not wanting to retaliate to the cutting comments and brutal attacks levelled his way by former friend and champion Feelgood. As time went by however, Bubblegum eventually unloaded on Feelgood but this will be the first time the two have ever come face to face in a one on one match. And to make things just a little more interesting... it's for the GPW Heavyweight Title. Can the fairytale championship reign continue for Bubblegum, or can Dirk shatter his dreams and become the first ever 2 time Heavyweight Champ?

 

Tag Team Special, Skeletor vs. Stella

Lethal Dose vs. Voodoo & "Sober" Mike Holmes

 

Alan Alan Alan Tasker's henchmen, Lethal Dose march into battle against former stable member Mike Holmes and the man they hold responsible for Holmes' new found sobriety - Voodoo. Cyanide and Toxic hope to tempt Holmes back over to the stable that two months ago he turned his back on. They want to snap him out of the spell they accuse Voodoo of putting him under. However, Holmes seems very happy with his new outlook on life and he and Voodoo look to send Lethal Dose packing in this tag team special. Lethal Dose have warned they will not be coming to the ring alone though, with them along with their attorney and law - Alan Alan Alan Tasker will be a 12 pack of Stella. Hoping the case of beer will prove to be a bigger demon to Holmes than the tag team itself. To fend off the 12 pack, Holmes and Voodoo will have Vooodoo's trusty skull, Skeletor in their corner. An unpredictable tag team match. Can MIke Holmes stay sober? Will Voodoo's spells work? Or will Lethal Dose deliver a beating big enough to break Voodoo's spell?

 

GPW British Title Match

Jak Dominotrescu vs. "Super" Sam Bailey

 

After pinning the British Champion last month in a tag team match, WKD's "Super" Sam Bailey has earned himself a title shot at GPW: "Christmas Crunch". Bailey, already a former tag team champion looks to add to his growing reputation by capturing his first ever singles gold in GPW. While reigning champion, Romanian Jak Domitrescu along with his cohorts - The Eastern Bloc look to make life as difficult as possible for the energetic live wire. Domitrescu has held onto the title since April this year with help from his fellow countrymen, but are his days numbered as champ? He surely wont be alone in this title outing and will have the Eastern Bloc close by, but can "Super" Sam Bailey overcome the odds to win his first singles gold in GPW?

 

And, the main event for the evening is...

 

GPW Tag Team Title 2/3 Falls Match

MIl-Anfield Connection © vs. Young Offenders

 

The heat just got turned up in this feud. The re-united Young Offenders have the most established tag team in GPW - The Mil-Anfield Connection firmly in their sights and not to mention the tag team trophy. These two teams met in September this year where there was no clear winner decided after the match ended in a draw. There will be NO excuses this time to not find a winner. This, for the first time in our history will be a 2/3 Falls Match for the tag team titles. A winner HAS to be decided, but who will it be? A truley epic encounter is in our midst as Jiggy Walker & "The Model" Danny Hope try to cling onto the championship that has defined them as a team and "Dangerous" Damon Leigh & Joey Hayes, The Young Offenders chase the title that one of the most popular tag teams in Europe have never held. Can the re-united friends overcome the well established unit that is The Mil-Anfield Connection? Or can the well oiled duo of the Mil-Anfield do what they've been doing all year and win again?

 

GPW British Title No.1 Contenders Match

Harry Doogle vs. Juice vs. Dylan Roberts vs. Chris Echo

 

After an eye catchingly good year from rookie Dylan Roberts, he has been included in this battle to earn a shot at the British Title. With a burning desire to win and the fans firmly behind him, Roberts could well mark his arrival onto the main roster by becoming the No.1 Contender and going for gold here. However, his opponents wont give him an easy ride. In a wonderful CC-08 tournament, no one impressed more than WKD's Chris Echo. Echo reached the CC-08 finals with two broken wrists and proved he is ready to take a step up. His previous attempts for British gold have been thwarted by the foreign legion numbers of the Eastern Bloc, is he ready to prove again that he is worthy of being No.1 Contender and finally lift the British title? Juice, the current CC8 champion has been as impressive as ever in singles competition this year, but can he compete in this match with 3 others all vying to be No.1 Contender? Also replacing Jervis Cottonbelly due to injury is Harry Doogle as a last minute entry could one half of the next gen score the upset win? , but with so many possible outcomes who will leave with the plaudits and go on to challenge for the British Title next year?

 

Lumberjack Match

Si Valour vs. Heresy

 

A violent and personal feud that has lasted all year long finally comes to a head in what promises to be a violent Lumberjack Match. Ever since brutalising Valour and cutting off all his hair, Heresy has, in some form or other dodged the challenge of Valour. Heresy claimed not to have lost his bottle or be running scared of the 2007 Break Out Star, yet during their Bull Rope clash at GPW: "V" where the two were tied to one another, Heresy still managed to find a way of escaping and creating distance between him and Valour. This time, in a special Lumberjack Match, no matter where either man go - there will be no escape. All lumberjacks will be at the ready to ensure neither man can escape the others clutches and a clear winner, one way or the other will HAVE to be decided. There will be nowhere to run to and nowhere to hide, no matter where they look. Heresy has been one step ahead of Valour all year, is this where he runs out of excuses, or can the master manipulator manipulate another win?

  

www.twitter.com/Memoire2cite -“ L’urbanisme des possibles ”Pourquoi dire des grands ensembles qu’ils sont des terres d’avenir ? www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaaQ2crb2Yoi0aqvbpHthqOowQ... Parce que la fréquentation régulière de ces quartiers m’a amené à y voir autre chose que des territoires à problèmes. Habiter les grands ensembles, c’est habiter la ville. Rarement

la ville-centre, celle du Paris haussmannien ou de la ville autrefois intra-muros, mais la ville tout

de même, un territoire souvent diffus, faible, pas toujours reconnaissable, mais où habite finalement aujourd’hui la majorité des urbains. Les grands ensembles font partie de cet assemblage d’entités autonomes, issues de conceptions rarement hasardeuses, mais pas forcément articulées les unes aux autres. Ils se distinguent du territoire urbanisé par leur masse, leur dimension,

parfois leur ordonnancement. C’est très clair quand on survole une ville depuis

un avion : les barres et les tours des grands ensembles émergent au milieu des

nappes de pavillons, des galettes commerciales et des infrastructures routières.

Pour autant, ils n’organisent ni ne structurent le territoire, comme l’espéraient

leurs concepteurs à l’origine. Ils sont juste plus grands.

Les grands ensembles appartiennent au paysage générique et banal de la banlieue.

Ils en sont même devenus des éléments constitutifs. A ce titre, les barres et les

tours nous parlent d’autre chose que d’habitat ou de difficultés sociales. Bien sûr,

ces immeubles ont tendance à accueillir une population souvent défavorisée, mal

intégrée aux réseaux de production et d’emploi. Bien sûr, les modes de vie et les

relations sociales y sont parfois plus durs et plus violents qu’ailleurs. Mais on ne

peut réduire les grands ensembles à ces difficultés. Leurs situations se rapportent

en effet à une condition beaucoup plus large qui est celle de la banlieue dans sa

globalité, soit la part majoritaire de la condition urbaine actuelle.

Intervenir dans les grands ensembles implique donc de penser aujourd’hui cette

nouvelle condition. Comme l’habiter ? Comment y développer une activité ?

Comment y affronter la précarité énergétique ? Les grands ensembles constituent

un formidable territoire pour aborder ces questions, ils disposent d’un formidable

gisement pour penser la ville de demain. Regarder un territoire, une nécéssité avant toute

transformation

6 | L’urbanisme des possibles

En 2012, le Ministère de la Culture nous a confié, à Ken Rabin et moi-même,

le commissariat et la scénographie d’une exposition itinérante de photographies

sur les grands ensembles. Cette initiative revient à Eric Langereau, directeur de

l’ESAM de Caen, l’Ecole supérieure d’art et de médias qui a accueilli l’exposition

pour la première fois.

L’exposition présente les œuvres d’une dizaine de photographes qui, de 1960

à nos jours, ont porté un regard sur les grands

ensembles. Les œuvres de ces photographes sont

riches d’émotions mais aussi d’enseignements car

la manière d’observer un site ou une situation est

absolument déterminante dans la manière de penser

leur transformation. Et le regard de ces artistesphotographes nous aide à dépasser l’héritage des

fausses représentations.

Au travers de cette exposition, nous avons essayé d’élever les grands ensembles

au rang d’objets dignes de considération. Non pas tant des objets de patrimoine

– dans le sens où il faudrait les conserver, s’interdire de les démolir – mais comme

des objets à la fois importants dans l’histoire d’après la Seconde guerre mondiale

et marquants dans le territoire. Des objets qu’il convient encore d’apprendre à

regarder. Le grand ensemble à l’origine : une promesse de modernité et de confort

Dès la fin des années 1950, la Caisse des dépôts s’impose comme le plus important

constructeur de logements en France. Son rôle est essentiel dans le développement

du modèle du grand ensemble. Chacune des opérations qu’elle livre fait l’objet

d’une mission photographique.

Essentiellement réalisées par Jean Biaugeaud, les images promotionnelles qui en

résultent témoignent de la formidable promesse de cette production à grande

échelle : un nouvel habitat égalitaire, une nouvelle organisation du territoire,

le tout soumis à un objectif essentiel, celui de résoudre la crise du logement. A

l’époque, l’enjeu, c’était d’abriter des gens qui travaillent. Ce qu’il faut retenir,

et ça me paraît extrêmement important par rapport à la situation actuelle dans

laquelle on se trouve aujourd’hui, c’est que le grand ensemble était fait pour loger

des salariés qui ne travaillaient pas sur place. Un lieu où on régénérait en quelque

sorte la force de travail. Le confort du logement participait à cette régénération.

Une vie nouvelle, une vie de pionniers

La vie collective des grands ensembles est très intense durant les premières années.

Les habitants s’engagent dans des mouvements d’éducation populaire et de

jeunesse et des associations. Beaucoup d’entre eux militent au parti communiste.

De 1959 à 1969, le photographe Jacques Windenberger habite Sarcelles. Il s’attache

alors à décrire la vie collective très intense dans cette cité encore en chantier, les

solidarités entre voisins aussi bien que les douceurs familiales.

Ses reportages décrivent avec fidélité la vie de ces pionniers qui inventent de

nouveaux modes de vie collectifs. Une vie un peu à l’écart, mais qui reste accrochée

à la société par le lien du travail.Une question identitaire

Les grands ensembles accueillent dès l’origine une importante communauté de

pieds-noirs et d’immigrés. Ce cosmopolitisme reste une caractéristique forte de

ces quartiers. Certains d’entre eux comptent aujourd’hui plus d’une trentaine de

nationalités différentes.

Né en banlieue parisienne, de père algérien et de mère française, le photographe

Bruno Boudjelal fait une série de clichés bouleversants sur le quotidien de plusieurs

générations de femmes d’origine algérienne.

A la fois journaux intimes et reportages sur les conditions de vie, ces séries

formalisent le trouble identitaire que peut ressentir la première génération des

enfants nés des grands ensembles.

Les grands ensembles se sont fondus dans le territoire

Commandées en 2010 par la Direction générale des patrimoines, les vues aériennes

de l’américain Alex MacLean témoignent de la manière dont quelques grands

ensembles emblématiques de la région parisienne perdurent.

Le photographe nous montre ici comme les barres et les tours ont perdu de leur

monumentalité. Les bâtiments, comme le sol, se sont usés. Les populations se sont

renouvelées. Les grandes dimensions de ces quartiers d’habitation, encore inédites

à l’époque de leur construction, ne se discernent plus dans l’hétérogénéité des

masses de la banlieue. De l’ambition initiale, il ne reste que le visage impersonnel

de ces innombrables fenêtres et une fascination mêlée d’inquiétude devant un

effacement si assumé de toute trace d’individualité.

De plus en plus, le grand ensemble et la ville se confondent. L’un et l’autre sont

immergés dans une urbanité spatiale et culturelle de plus en plus diffuse et

homogèneUn paysage en perpetuelle métamorphose

Le photographe Christian Siloé fonde un récit à partir des chantiers – de la

démolition à la reconstruction – d’une cité de Montereau-Fault-Yonne. On

y voit des grues héroïques déchiqueter les restes puissants de structures

d’immeubles. On y voit aussi les chantiers de pavillons qui viennent

reconquérir le paysage des barres et des tours démolies pour générer un

paysage reconnaissable de lotissement.

Les grands ensembles, ce sont des paysages en métamorphose. C’est

énorme, c’est grand, c’est solide, c’est en béton, mais c’est aussi très

fragile. On les a construit, on les a réhabilité, on les a re-réhabilité, on les

a partiellement démoli, on y a reconstruit d’autres logements, …

Cette fragilité est aujourd’hui inscrite dans le paysage et la culture de

la banlieue. Depuis les

grandes démolitions à

l’explosif des années

80-90, tout le monde

sait que les grands

ensembles sont en

sursis, qu’ils peuvent

disparaître à tout

moment.

Un univers d’idées reçues

Les œuvres de Mohamed Bourouissa rassemblent, dans des mises en

scène soigneuses, les signifiants de la culture des cités : squat de hall,

regroupement en pied d’immeubles, destruction de voiture sur parking,

affrontement entre jeunes sur trottoir...

En faisant appel au vocabulaire noble des tableaux maniéristes

(composition, lumière, pose, cadrage), l’artiste-photographe hisse

les idées reçues au rang de mythe. Parce que la banlieue et les grands

ensembles, c’est aussi ces regards, ces gestes, ces manières d’être en

groupe, ou simplement les uns avec les autres dans des espaces très petits

alors que, juste à côté, il y a des étendues immenses.

Cette chorégraphie des corps, des gestes et des regards – inquiétante pour

certains – est bien sûr liée à l’architecture des grands ensembles. On ne

peut l’ignorer lorsqu’il s’agit de penser aujourd’hui leur devenir.

Entre solitude et promiscuité

Le photographe Cyrus Cornut ne pose pas simplement son regard sur les

grands ensembles, mais sur l’ensemble de la banlieue parisienne.

Ses photographies nous montrent un rapport très particulier des indivi

-

dus aux grands espaces, à l’horizon. Les personnages paraissent petits et

isolés au milieu d’un paysage de fenêtres anonymes et de blocs gigan

-

tesques, au sein desquels on vit très près les uns des autres.

Cette disproportion entre solitude et promiscuité, ce sont bien sûr les

grands ensembles qui l’ont installé. Mais elle s’est étendu depuis à l’en

-

semble des territoires sub- et péri-urbains.

C’est extrêmement important de considérer que cette affaire des grands

ensembles ne se limite pas simplement aux périmètres dit « ZUS », qu’ils

ne se distinguent pas de ce vaste paysage qu’est devenu la ville, la ville

dès que l’on s’éloigne de son centre historique.

Que nous apprennent ces photographies ?

La promesse égalitaire qui fonde l’origine des grands ensembles a-t-elle

entièrement disparue ? L’intensité de la vie collective s’est-elle substituée

à la seule violence des rapports humains ? Peut-on réduire les barres et les

tours aux seuls stigmates du colonialisme et du communautarisme iden

-

titaire ? Ces photographies montrent que l’histoire des grands ensembles

est bien plus complexe et qu’ils disposent de bien d’autres atouts. Car le

propre des grands ensembles est qu’ils restent les héritiers de la politique

étatique, planificatrice et égalitaire des Trente Glorieuses tout en étant

devenus poreux au territoire qui les entoure. Et c’est justement ce carac

-

tère double qui fait des grands ensembles des terres d’avenir : des terres

mieux adaptées aux conditions économiques et sociétales d’aujourd’hui,

des terres également propices au renouvellement des pratiques de projet.

Le potentiel des espaces verts

Les grandes étendues des espaces verts qui caractérisent la plupart de

ces quartiers témoignent de cette ambigüité. À l’origine, les grands en

-

sembles reposaient sur un certain nombre de principes affirmés. Le pre

-

mier consistait à implanter les constructions au milieu de vastes étendues

paysagères, apportant ainsi l’air, la lumière et la nature au plus près des

logements. François Parfait, ingénieur des Ponts-et-Chaussées, avait alors

déclaré que ces espaces verts devaient relever d’un statut particulier :

celui de service public. Ce statut à part, qui ne relevait ni du domaine

public ni du domaine privé, n’a jamais vu le jour. Les espaces verts n’ont

jamais trouvé leurs usages et sont restés des lieux d’interdiction, difficiles

à gérer. Des lieux d’inquiétude mais aussi des lieux coûteux en entretien

pour les locataires, les copropriétaires et les collectivités locales.

À partir des années 1980-90, on a commencé à introduire un autre modèle

en aménageant des rues et en distinguant l’espace public de l’espace privé. De

fait, on a simplifié un certain nombre de questions posées depuis l’origine. Les

espaces verts ont été découpés en parcelles. Puis on a mis des clôtures. Et ces

espaces verts, très généreux au départ, que sont-ils devenus ? Essentiellement

des jardins de vue. On a créé des espaces verts privés, morcelés, plus petits, gérés

par les bailleurs sociaux mais toujours sans usage. On a gagné un espace public,

clairement délimité – le plus souvent, les clôtures servent davantage à délimiter

la rue qu’une entité résidentielle – mais, là encore, celui-ci a rarement trouvé

d’autres usages que ceux de la circulation et du stationnement.

Avec les opérations de rénovation urbaine, nous avons découvert que les grands

ensembles pouvaient accueillir un foncier privé, dédié à de nouveaux types

d’habitats privés, générant ainsi une certaine mixité sociale. Pour autant, les

espaces verts résidentiels sont restés des jardins de vue tandis que les espaces

publics sont demeurés des rues circulantes. Est-ce le seul avenir pour ces espaces

verts ? N’y a-t-il pas d’autres hypothèses à envisager ? En élargissant la focale,

on découvre d’autres vocations possibles. Je pense par exemple à des pratiques

solidaires et locales ou à des filières économiques courtes pouvant associer

les habitants ou les actifs logés à proximité. Car ce qui caractérise les grands

ensembles, et que l’on oublie bien souvent, c’est leur ancrage dans le territoire.

De par les liens fusionnels qu’ils entretiennent avec la banlieue, comme évoquée

plus haut. Mais aussi du fait du chômage qui touche souvent plus leurs habitants.

Car si la vocation première des grands ensembles consistait à loger une population

salariée, celle-ci est aujourd’hui d’accueillir des résidents qui font bien plus qu’y

habiter.

Les habitants ont pris de l’avance

Dans de nombreux quartiers périphériques, les habitants exploitent les espaces

libres dont ils disposent pour inventer de nouveaux usages, parfois collectives ainsi

que de nouvelles activités économiques, qualifiées le plus souvent d’informelles (à

ne pas confondre avec souterraines qui désignent le commerce de biens illicites).

C’est le cas tout particulièrement des résidents de nombreux pavillons qui ont

su exploiter les potentiels de leurs garages, de leurs jardins ou d’une partie de

leurs rez-de-chaussée. Ne peut-on imaginer un tel potentiel de « capacitation »

(empowerment) dans les espaces verts des grands ensembles ? Ces surfaces de

pleine terre qui s’étendent au pied des barres et des tours, encombrantes pour

les gestionnaires et les pouvoirs publics, ne pourraient-il pas profiter aujourd’hui

pleinement aux habitants ? Les espaces verts contribueraient alors à faire advenir

de nouvelles modalités de travail, dans l’esprit de ce que Jeremy Rifkin a appelé

la « Troisième révolution industrielle ». En ces temps incertains, où se prépare

une probable pénurie énergétique, les grands ensembles auraient alors toutes les

chances de devenir les porteurs d’une nouvelle promesse. Créer un parc d’initiatives à Toulouse

À Toulouse, dans le quartier de Bagatelle, nous travaillons sur un grand territoire

de 365 hectares, aussi grand que le centre-ville. Celui-ci est bordé par la rocade, la

Garonne et un boulevard de ceinture du centre-ville. Il comprend notamment cinq

quartiers d’habitat social : Bagatelle, La Faourette, Papus, Tabar et Bordelongue.

Sur ce projet de renouvellement urbain, nous abordons plusieurs échelles,

plusieurs temporalités. Nous élaborons un schéma directeur, aménageons un

certain nombre d’espaces publics et accompagnons, en tant qu’urbaniste-conseil,

toutes les opérations.

Ce territoire est constitué de petites « poches » de quelques centaines de logements

sociaux, de pavillons et de copropriétés construits, pour l’essentiel dans les années

1950 et 1960. Chaque « poche » s’est implantée sur une assiette foncière provenant

de la réunion de plusieurs parcelles maraîchères. On a des isolats, des sortes de

successions de petites unités placées les unes à côté des autres. Pour l’architecte

Candilis, auteur du Mirail, l’aménagement de ces quartiers juxtaposés, c’est l’antimodèle.

Est-ce que c’est l’anti-modèle ? Je n’en suis pas si sûr. Parce que la proximité

de toutes ces « poches » est d’une grande richesse. Une des choses les plus

frappantes, c’est le contraste entre les secteurs de grands ensembles et les secteurs

pavillonnaires. Bien que disposant de très vastes espaces verts, les abords des

premiers restent peu investis par les habitants tandis que les maisons débordent

d’usages économiques et associatifs.

Ce contraste nous a beaucoup interrogés. Nous pensions naïvement, avant d’explorer le site, que les secteurs pavillonnaires

n’avaient d’autres fonctions que résidentielles, que leur capacité d’évolution

restait, de fait, très limité. Nous avons découvert des quartiers très vivants, les

activités dans et aux abords des maisons ne cessant de changer, de se transformer.

Et on a commencé à imaginer des choses.

Il se trouve que ce territoire est entièrement soumis à un impératif majeur, le plan

d’exposition au bruit, celui-ci se trouvant dans l’axe des pistes de l’aéroport. La

stratégie de densification n’était donc pas de mise. Les vides n’ayant pas de valeur

foncière, ils pouvaient être mis à profit pour offrir aux habitants des avantages

comparables à ceux des pavillons.

Ainsi, plutôt que de diviser, comme ailleurs, les espaces verts, nous avons choisi

de les amplifier, de les réunir. Dans le quartier de Bagatelle en particulier, nous

avons constitué une entité large et généreuse de 4 hectares, la reconstruction

de l’offre de logements étant reportée de

part et d’autre.

Mais quelle affectation proposer à ce

parc sans alourdir encore les charges

des locataires et de la collectivité ?

Cet enjeu était d’autant plus crucial

que la proportion était d’espaces verts

était devenue, dans ce quartier, très

importante. Un calcul nous a paru éloquent. Il s’agit du nombre de mères carrés par

logement. Si on compare le quartier de Bagatelle avec le centre-ville de Toulouse,

ce ratio était multiplié par quatre.

Mais dès lors que ce parc s’ouvrait aux initiatives des habitants, ce ratio pouvait

diminuer. Au vu de ce qui se passe dans les pavillons, on n’a pas souhaité se

cantonner aux jardins familiaux ou partagés. Ce parc est devenu le parc des

possibles, un parc capable accueillir les initiatives économiques, énergétiques,

agricoles, alimentaires, culturelles, ludiques et sportives des habitants. Les

porteurs de projets disposent d’un morceau de terrain, d’une parcelle, pour une

durée déterminée. Le sol reste propriété de la collectivité, mais il devient, pour

une bonne part, autogéré.

La constitution d’une trame facilite ensuite les connexions à des systèmes de

partage et de coproduction.

Cette hypothèse n’est pas tout à fait nouvelle. Nous pensons notamment à Andrea

Branzi qui a poursuivi, depuis les utopies d’Archizoom dans les années 1960,

une réflexion sur « l’urbanisation faible ». Le dessein de la ville n’étant plus en

mesure d’être planifié, la trame constitue un système ouvert, capable de mettre

en relation des noyaux d’activités éparses, extensifs ou graduels. Nous sommes

loin du modèle de la ZAC. Parole à...

Pierre Vandenbrouck et Julia Golovanoff

Créer, par la trame urbaine, des pages de liberté

Dans le quartier de Bagatelle, il y a eu beaucoup de démolitions, qui ont eu pour

effet de créer du vide.

Nous avons commencé notre travail sur cette question.

Que pouvions nous en faire ? Que faire de tous ces petits espaces, souvent sans

affectation, sans fonction ? Résidentialiser ? Créer des jardins de copropriété ?

Plutôt que de faire des jardins de copropriété surdimensionnés, nous avons

proposé de regrouper, de rassembler tous ces fragments de terrains libres pour

faire un ensemble sur lequel on puisse imaginer des choses et créer un projet.

Nous avons saisi l’opportunité d’utiliser l’espace laissé par les démolitions pour

relier deux espaces verts existants, actuellement enclavés, pour créer un grand

parc qui ferait quatre hectares et permettrait de renouveler l’image du quartier

de Bagatelle.

Mais on ne voulait pas seulement proposer un parc, public et entièrement géré par

la collectivité où toutes les activités seraient assurées et encadrées par le service

public. On pensait qu’il y avait matière à proposer autre chose, plus adapté aux

besoins du quartier. L’idée que l’on a proposée était d’apposer sur ce grand espace

une trame, structure capable d’accueillir des espaces de liberté.

Cette trame, c’était aussi l’occasion de caractériser très fortement l’espace et

de créer une sorte de structure suffisamment forte pour qu’elle puisse, tout en

existant, accueillir une grande variété d’usages.

L’idée n’était pas d’imposer quelque chose de rigide, mais de voir toute la liberté

qu’offre une trame et tout ce qu’elle peut accueillir de différent.

Des jardins plus ouverts

Tout le parc a été divisé par cette trame, en parcelles.

Le mot parcelle nous convenait bien, parce que la parcelle, c’est la petite partie

d’un tout. Et on imagine que tout y est possible, en fait. Et puis on aimait

bien aussi le mot parcelle qui désignait au Moyen-âge un petit morceau d’une

demeure seigneuriale, mise à la disposition d’un serf, et que celui-ci cultivait,

entretenait et dont il se nourrissait. Ici, il ne s’agit pas d’un seigneur ou d’un

serf, mais d’une collectivité et d’une sorte de sous-locataire qui serait un usager

ou une association. Alors on imagine que cela pourrait s’organiser un peu comme

les jardins partagés, mais de façon plus ouverte car l’idée est que les parcelles ne

soient pas forcément des jardins. Elles peuvent être autre chose. Quoi ? On ne le sait pas, mais on se doute bien que les futurs usagers auront beaucoup d’idées

à proposer. On imagine que pour obtenir une parcelle, un habitant, un groupe

d’habitants ou une association puissent proposer un usage et que cette initiative

soit choisie pour son intérêt, pour ce qu’elle peut apporter aux habitants, pour ce

qu’elle peut apporter au quartier en général.

Tout le parc est divisé en parcelles de 200 mètres carrés, surface qui a été choisie

parce que dans 200 mètres carrés, on peut faire des choses très variées.

On ne sait pas ce qu’il y aura dans ces parcelles. On imagine. On peut imaginer

mille choses. Ces parcelles ne sont pas toutes privatisées. Il y a aussi des parcelles

publiques parce que si la ville ne gère pas tout, n’entretient pas tout, il y a aussi

l’idée que la collectivité ne se désintéresse pas de son sol. Et une part de l’espace

public doit rester porteuse de tous les usages possibles, sans appropriation possible.

Dans le cadre d’une préfiguration du futur parc, on a planté des espaces qui

permettent aussi de tester spatialement la taille des parcelles, de voir ce que

ça veut dire d’avoir des parcelles de cette surface sur ces terrains. L’idée est

qu’on prépare le futur. Les habitants, les associations peuvent commencer à se

demander : « Mais, qu’est-ce que j’aimerais faire si j’avais un sol disponible en

extérieur ? ». C’est une chose importante, car les habitants des pavillons ont un

jardin, un garage, alors que les habitants des immeubles collectifs n’ont que leurs

logements. Ils n’ont peut être jamais espéré pouvoir bénéficier d’un sol, prêté par

la collectivité.

Nous, on trace une trame qui peut accueillir les idées de tous les habitants, du

quartier comme d’ailleurs.

Car généralement plus on aménage un espace, moins on a le droit d’y faire de

choses, moins on a confiance dans l’usager et finalement tous les usages qui

s’écartent de ce qui a été prévu sont considérés comme déviants.

C’est finalement dommage de voir que la générosité des pouvoirs publics ou

l’attention portée par les concepteurs sur les espaces publics soient à ce point

réduits une fois les aménagements réalisés.

Ce parc de Toulouse avec ses parcelles, parle aussi de l’usager et de sa place dans

l’espace. Si on synthétise, dans l’histoire des parcs, on a les Tuileries où l’usager

est spectateur d’une nature mathématique, ordonnancée et parfaite. Les Buttes

Chaumont ensuite, c’est la même chose, sauf que c’est un bout de nature qui

est importé à l’intérieur de la ville. On s’isole de la ville et on admire la nature.

C’est dans le Parc de la Villette qu’on a commencé à s’asseoir dans l’herbe, ce

qui paraissait encore un sacrilège dans beaucoup de jardins parisiens. En fait, on

imagine qu’avec ces parcelles, nous allons passer à une autre phase, où on pourrait

s’emparer du sol et en faire quelque chose. Parole à...

Eric Amanou

Je vais vous raconter, comment chargé de la dimension sociale du projet, nous

avons mis en œuvre toute la dimension participative autour de ces intentions.

Au début du projet, nous avions deux intuitions. La première, celle d’un grand parc

de quatre hectares devant relier trois secteurs de Bagatelle, aujourd’hui repliés sur

eux-mêmes. Notre deuxième intuition, c’était de ne pas faire un parc d’agrément,

comme il en existe déjà à Toulouse, notamment dans le quartier voisin de La

Faourette.

On arrive avec quelques idées comme l’agriculture urbaine ou des initiatives

culturelles. On n’en sait pas plus que ça. Cela suffit pour organiser des rencontres

avec les habitants et recueillir leurs réactions.

Nous décidons d’aller vers les habitants, pas par une réunion publique, mais là où

ils sont. Et sur une semaine, on organise une quinzaine de temps de rencontres.

On discute, on demande aux bailleurs de nous organiser des rencontres en pied

d’immeuble avec des locataires, on va voir les personnes âgées, on va sur le marché,

à la brocante, à la sortie des écoles. On rencontre des jeunes enfants dans les

centres d’animation. En tout, c’est une quinzaine de rencontres, au cours desquels

on a dialogué avec 350 habitants, commerçants, associatifs qui nourrissent les

intentions du parc.

De ces libres discussions, où la tendance qui s’exprimait était un parc conciliant

fonction d’agrément, nature en ville et activités

partagées, on a réussi à dégager certains

éléments de fonctionnement et des éléments

programmatiques.

On a aussi voulu identifier les ressources dans

une logique de recensement des initiatives et des

prédispositions à venir. Sur l’idée du grand parc

on a réussi à dégager un élément-clé. Cet espace

vert, il doit finalement être le trait d’union entre trois sous-ensembles et trois

fonctionnements résidentiels. Tout ce travail et le travail sur le fonctionnement

social qui avait été mené en amont par Fanny Martel, nous a permis de tricoter et

de mieux assurer nos intentions, nos intuitions, nos éléments programmatiques.

Dans le même temps cela a permis aux concepteurs, atelier Landauer et atelier

Jours, d’y voir un peu plus clair sur cette idée de trame et de parcellaire.

Aujourd’hui on se demande aussi si ce n’est pas aussi notre métier d’aller vers les

habitants, parce que la démarche compte tout autant que ce qui va être proposé.

Le fait d’aller vers les habitants, avec nos panneaux, d’engager des discussions

libres, tout cela crée des conditions d’adhésion plus favorables.

Je voudrais maintenant aborder quatre difficultés auxquelles nous avons été

confrontées.

La première concerne la gouvernance des projets.

De telles intentions, un tel processus de projet, réinterrogent tous les métiers de

la direction de projet, chez les bailleurs et au

sein des différents services de la collectivité.

Culturellement cela suppose de sortir de toute

standardisation de l’espace public et de tous

les modèles. Cela questionne les logiques de

propriété, de fermeture, de séparation, de

distinction des fonctions... Culturellement

c’est difficile quand on n’a pas un modèle

précis à substituer à celui que l’on propose

d’abandonner.

Finalement, on propose de réfléchir et d’agir

comme des développeurs sociaux. C’est-àdire que l’initiative qui va sortir va devenir

le premier élément de projet, sur lequel on

appuiera un deuxième. Mais rien n’est connu

ni maîtrisé d’avance. C’est une logique de

développement sans outils, hors maquette financière.

Par exemple, une des difficultés qu’on avait avec ce parc, c’est un bâtiment qui

peut gêner son déploiement. On nous demande immédiatement ce qu’on va en

faire. Et on ne sait pas leur répondre. L’écrêter, le réhabiliter, le démolir ? Et les

incertitudes ne rentrent pas dans la maquette financière, il faut faire inscrire le

devenir de ce bâtiment. On l’inscrit donc, en faisant le pari que dans 3-4 ans les

lignes seront fongibles.

La deuxième limite, est celle de la participation traditionnelle, connue.

Avec ce projet, on dépasse les figures habituelles de la concertation et de la

participation, du « faire pour » ou du « faire avec ».

Sur cette logique de coproduction, de reconnaissance d’expertise et surtout

d’incitation aux initiatives, on va mobiliser une autre figure, celle du « faire par

». Il va falloir inventer d’autres figures de la concertation et de la participation.

Savoir solliciter, mobiliser un prestataire qui va animer le territoire, aller à la

rencontre et accompagner les porteurs de projets. On ne sait pas bien qui va

répondre. Mais il va falloir repousser les limites pour inventer un nouveau métier

que celui de la concertation ou de la participation.La troisième limite, c’est celle de la tranquillité publique, de la régulation de

l’espace public. Dans notre concertation et en règle générale, la question des

détournements d’usage, du non respect des espaces et des équipements et de

la dégradation volontaire bride l’imagination. Au travers de ce projet, je pense

qu’il faudra faire naître d’autres métiers de la régulation publique. Les jardins

partagés, d’une certaine manière, sont aussi des petits miracles, un peu partout

dans le pays. Partout où ils existent et où ils sont bien faits, ils sont extrêmement

respectés, y compris dans des contextes de grande tension. Les associations

gestionnaires de ces jardins-là, parce qu’ils ont d’autres modes de faire, parce qu’ils

travaillent autrement avec des habitants, parce que c’est une valorisation aussi de

la ressource, produisent des formes de respect, de régulation.

Pour obtenir une régulation de l’espace public afin que toutes ces initiatives se

fassent, il va falloir inventer des nouvelles figures de la régulation, à l’image

des gestionnaires de ces jardins partagés ou des collectifs de jeunes architectes

ou paysagistes qui fabriquent avec les publics qu’ils rencontrent et dont les

productions tiennent et sont respectées par tous, ou presque. Ces gens ont une

capacité, dans une approche nouvelle envers les habitants, dans leur aptitude à

être acceptés, à réussir là où l’action publique traditionnelle échoue.

La quatrième limite tient à notre approche républicaine. On se fixe des limites

idéologiques, républicaines. Si on n’accepte pas d’encourager « l’activité de la

débrouille », on ne voit pas comment ça va se faire. On connaît ces activités on

voit bien que ce n’est pas très légal, que la République ne peut pas cautionner ça

et doit fixer une limite. Mais a-t-on vraiment le choix ? Il y a peut-être une logique

de pragmatisme de l’action publique qui va devoir permettre de détendre un peu

ces grands principes républicains.

Un chiffre nous a vraiment surpris. Depuis que le statut existe, c’est dans le

quartier habitat social du Mirail qu’il y a le plus d’auto-entrepreneur. Cela rend

compte de la fermeture du marché traditionnel et de la capacité des gens à

entreprendre, innover, tenter des activités. Lorsqu’il y a cadre légal, les habitants

y adhérent. Mais si cela doit passer par de la « débrouille », ils iront aussi. Nous,

savons que sur ce genre de projet, il va falloir aussi qu’on repousse ces limites de

l’action publique républicaine.Histoire de projet

Fosses : le grand ensemble devient le centre-ville

Cela fait dix ans que nous travaillons sur le projet de Fosses. Nous avons développé

un projet urbain. Aujourd’hui nous avons la maîtrise d’œuvre des espaces publics

et une mission de coordination. On en est à peu près à mi-parcours.

Fosses, est une commune de 10 000 habitants dans le Val d’Oise, en limite de l’Ile

de France, bordée par les grandes plaines agricoles de l’Oise. C’est une ville qui n’a

jamais eu de centre. Une ville périurbaine qui s’est développée à partir des années

1960-70 à proximité de la gare, à plusieurs kilomètres du village d’origine. Elle

comprend des pavillons, un grand ensemble (avec son centre commercial et son

centre social), un lotissement fait de maisons en bandes dites « chalandonnettes

» (elles ont été financées dans le cadre d’une loi du ministre Albin Chalandon),

un réseau d’étroites venelles piétonnes et quelques gros équipements (gymnase,

piscine, poste).

Comme la ville disposait d’une densité plus importante au niveau du grand

ensemble, la ville y a disposé la mairie dans un bâtiment préfabriqué. Puis,

dans les années 1980-90, elle y a construit une église, une halle de marché et

quelques immeubles collectifs aux façades régionalistes. Cela forme un ensemble

très disparate, une juxtaposition de fragments urbains qui relèvent chacun d’une

conception urbaine particulière, sans aucun lien ni articulation, une juxtaposition

de machines solitaires séparées par des vides indistincts, remplis de stationnements

ou de buttes de terre.

Du fait de cette situation, le projet de renouvellement urbain qui nous a été confié

est vite devenu un projet de centre-ville. Il y avait une attente forte des habitants

dans ce sens. Les choses qui nous ont été dites, au tout début, c’était des choses

simples: « Quand on fait une photo pour un mariage, on aimerait bien que le décor

soit autre chose qu’un préfabriqué ! ». Il y avait donc un besoin de symbolique.

Mais en même temps, il y avait un paradoxe. Parce que rien ne justifiait a priori

que le quartier du Plateau, où se trouvait le grand ensemble devienne, plus qu’un

autre, le centre-ville.

C’est très particulier une ville qui se développe sans centre. Cela peut générer un

repli des habitants au sein de leurs logements ou de leurs unités de voisinage.

A Fosses, cela a généré, à l’inverse, une solidarité incroyable. Ici, tout le monde

semble se connaître et s’entraider. Durant la canicule de l’été 2003, tous les

habitants se sont organisés pour porter secours aux personnes les plus âgées ou

les plus immobiles. Et Fosses n’a pas connu le nombre de décès des autres villes

françaises. D’où provient cette fraternité ? Peut-être du fait qu’aucun habitant

n’est ici plus légitime qu’un autre. Pas d’habitant du cœur qui dédaignerait celui

de la périphérie : la ville n’a pas de centre ! Pas d’habitant plus ancien pour rejeter

le dernier arrivé : l’urbanisation y est à la fois trop improvisée et trop récente !

Toutes les étapes du projet que nous avons élaboré depuis dix ans se sont faites

avec les habitants. Chaque option a été discutée le soir, dans des ateliers urbains,

des réunions au centre social, au collège ou à la mairie. Mais aussi les samedis

matin devant le centre commercial. Les habitants ont toujours répondu présents.

La principale difficulté était d’installer une nouvelle identité urbaine sans détruire

ce qui fait, paradoxalement, la force et la spécificité de Fosses : celles d’une ville

à peu près égalitaire. Nous nous sommes dit qu’il fallait intervenir sur les vides,

les organiser sans forcément les délimiter par du plein. Parmi ces vides, il y aurait

une place. Mais une place traversée par les voies de circulation qui soit davantage

une juxtaposition de parvis qu’une place principale. Il ne s’agissait pas d’établir de

hiérarchie. Nous avons juste densifié un peu.

Ces parvis s’installent dans la continuité de l’actuelle placette du marché qui forme

une première équerre. Trois autres équerres viennent compléter ce dispositif.

Pourquoi d’autres équerres ? Par respect du déjà-là mais aussi pour faire que ce

nouveau morceau de ville fasse le lien entre ceux qui l’ont précédé. Prolonger

l’existant et non s’y substituer. Dialoguer et non ajouter un monologue de plus.

Jusqu’à présent, aucune génération n’avait cherché à poursuivre l’œuvre de la

génération précédente.

D’autres outils sont venus a posteriori. Il s’agit du poché. Si on regarde le plan de

Rome fait par Nolli au XVIIIème siècle, on voit que l’espace public, les places, ce

sont des blancs dans le « poché » noir du bâti. A Fosses, dans cette ville périurbaine,

quand on noircit sur un plan le bâti, il reste une gigantesque proportion de blanc.

Comment dès lors faire exister une place, par essence vide, au milieu du vide ? Si

on regarde d’un peu plus près ce même plan de Nolli, on voit qu’il a laissé en blanc tous les espaces accessibles au public, comme l’intérieur des églises ou de certains

palais. Ce n’est pas simplement le blanc dans le plein du bâti, c’est aussi le bâti

accessible au public. Et cela dit beaucoup de choses de la ville. Si on applique ce

principe au plan de Fosses on voit que finalement, la disparité, la difficulté de

cette ville, relève des registres d’accessibilité. Ce que le seul poché des bâtis ne dit

pas forcément. Nous avons proposé de remédier à cette difficulté en créant des

connexions avec les circulations existantes. Cela a permis de développer un vrai

réseau piéton, de renforcer cette identité piétonne très forte de la ville, issue des

conceptions urbaines des années 60-70 et qui fonctionnent aujourd’hui très bien.

Le premier bâtiment construit relève du symbolique. Il s’agit du pôle civique,

qui comprend la mairie et quelques équipements. C’est un très beau bâtiment

construit par Pierre-Louis Faloci. Il forme la deuxième équerre de la place. Ce

faisant, il introduit un phénomène inattendu, une relation très surprenante avec

les constructions existantes. Cette confrontation est très stimulante. Le vide entre

ces constructions de plusieurs âges, de plusieurs styles, apparaît d’ores et déjà

comme un lieu à investir et non plus un interstice sans valeur. Il devient porteur

de nouveaux imaginaires et, pourquoi pas, de nouvelles initiatives.

Une question reste. Dans un reportage réalisé sur la ville de Fosses par le collectif

Fusion, un jeune homme part de son regret de voir 3 des 6 tours démolis dans le

cadre de ce projet. Ces démolitions, c’était une demande de l’ANRU. « De quoi vat-on avoir l’air avec tous ces immeubles plus bas, à la même hauteur ? » s’interroget-il. On comprend vite que sa référence de ville se situe du côté des autres grands

ensembles – Sarcelles ou Garges-Lès-Gonesse – situés à proximité et que ces grands

ensembles, également sans hiérarchie, incarnent pour lui la vie métropolitaine.

Comment dès lors préserver ce qui, du grand ensemble, participe de cette identité

? C’est une vraie question pour l’avenir du renouvellement urbain. Il est clair, qu’à

Fosses, on aurait pu faire sans démolir ces trois tours…Besançon : “ un urbanisme de la vie privée”

Ce projet porte sur un grand ensemble de la banlieue de Besançon. Nous avons

fait un projet urbain qui prévoyait la réhabilitation de certaines barres et la

démolition-reconstruction de certaines autres. Nous avons ensuite réalisé, comme

architecte, une soixantaine de logements.

À Besançon, l’origine de la ville se trouve dans la boucle du Doubs. C’est une

ville magnifique, entourée par les fortifications de Vauban. Mais dès qu’on est à

l’extérieur, tout est déconnecté, avec un relief extrêmement complexe. Les zones

pavillonnaires et d’activités sont entièrement privatisés et greffé sur des voies de

desserte. Les seuls espaces qui restent complètement ouverts sont ceux des grands

ensembles. Il s’ensuit une situation très contrastée entre des secteurs qui n’offrent

aucun espace de rencontre en dehors des enclos et des secteurs très ouverts, mais

qui n’autorisent aucune liberté d’action en dehors du logement.

Il y a un très beau texte d’Émile Aillaud qui s’appelle « Un urbanisme de la vie

privée » et qui explique que ce qu’il manque aux grands ensembles ce ne sont

pas tant des espaces collectifs que des espaces où on peut être seul, où on peut

se mouvoir librement en dehors des logements. Des lieux où les enfants peuvent

construire leurs personnalités, à l’écart des groupes et de leurs familles. J’ajouterai

aujourd’hui : et où les adultes peuvent initier de nouvelles activités.

Aujourd’hui encore, on insiste beaucoup sur l’intimité du logement et les relations

de voisinage mais très peu sur cette dimension de solitude et de capacitation.

Dans ce quartier de La Bouloie, nous avons superposé à la trame ouverte du

grand ensemble une nouvelle trame plus privée. De cette superposition émerge

une diversité de lieux et de situations qui, nous l’espérons, favorisent la solitude

et l’autonomie. Cette diversité provient notamment de la manière dont nous

avons travaillé le terrain et implanté les constructions dans la pente. Les barres

n’entretenaient aucun rapport avec le sol.

Cette opération a été réalisée avec un budget extrêmement réduit. Une contrainte

intéressante qui nous a permis de

placer l’architecture ailleurs que

dans l’effet plastique et de montrer

combien les grands ensembles ne

souffrent pas tant de la monotonie de

leurs façades que de leurs difficultés

à établir une relation féconde avec

leur sol. Repenser ce rapport permet

d’offrir aux habitants la capacité de

réinventer un quotidien en dehors

de leurs logements. Châlons-en-Champagne : un grand ensemble face à

la campagne

À Châlons-en-Champagne, nous avons réalisé un projet urbain qui portait sur le

devenir du quartier Vallée-Saint-Pierre, situé en entrée de ville.

Ce qui nous a frappés, c’est le rapport qu’entretenait ce quartier avec la campagne

environnante. Campagne dont elle n’était séparée que par une voie rapide.

C’est une question vraiment intéressante que ce rapport d’échelle entre le

grand ensemble et la grande étendue de la campagne. Dans l’histoire des grands

ensembles, il y a deux grands modèles. Le modèle de l’unité de voisinage et un

autre modèle qui consiste à mettre directement en relation l’intimité du logement

avec le territoire, sans échelle intermédiaire.

C’est ce rapport là que nous avons tenté de mettre en valeur. Il se trouve qu’il y a

toute une tradition française du rapport entre l’intimité et la campagne. Il s’agit

de la tradition des Jardins à la Française. La plupart de ces jardins mettent en scène

l’horizon avec un premier plan composé, une géométrie affirmée et entièrement

maîtrisée. Ce dispositif permet, en quelque sorte, de faire entrer la campagne à

l’intérieur d’espaces plus intimes. C’est de là que nous sommes partis pour élaborer

ce projet. Nous avons établi une trame qui établit un lien avec le paysage qui se

déploie au-delà de la voie rapide.

Ce projet a été réalisé il y a quelques années mais j’y retrouve des choses qu’on

essaie de faire maintenant, de manière beaucoup plus consciente et précise,

notamment à Toulouse : l’installation d’une trame géométrique à l’intérieur de

laquelle plusieurs programmes peuvent venir s’installer. Une trame sans axe ni

hiérarchie car la ville aujourd’hui n’est plus le fait du prince. Strasbourg : accompagner le temps de l’entre deux

Nous avons réalisé une étude sur le quartier du Port du Rhin à Strasbourg. Cette

étude s’inscrivait dans le cadre d’un programme du PUCA intitulé « Qualité et sûreté

des espaces urbains ». Il s’agissait d’apporter les modifications ou les compléments

nécessaires à l’acceptation sociale d’un projet conçu par la paysagiste Marion

Talagrand, dans le cadre d’un schéma directeur élaboré par l’équipe Reichen et

Robert. Nous avons travaillé ici avec l’équipe REP (« Réussir l’espace public »), en

particulier avec Anne Wyvekens.

Le site en question accueillait, jusqu’à Schengen, le poste-frontière. Il est

aujourd’hui déserté. On y trouve aujourd’hui un ensemble de 520 logements,

une école, deux églises – une catholique, une protestante – ainsi qu’un parc

métropolitain, le parc des Deux Rives.

Le projet de développement de la ville de Strasbourg sur ces rives du Rhin

s’accompagne d’une nouvelle ligne de tramway qui va jusqu’à Kehl, en Allemagne.

C’est un projet très ambitieux, très emblématique. Il prévoit la construction de

1 500 logements, ainsi que de nombreux commerces, bureaux et équipements.

Jusqu’à présent, ce quartier était plus proche du centre de Kehl que du centre de

Strasbourg. La plupart des gens faisaient leurs courses dans la ville allemande, de

l’autre côté du Rhin, sur un axe de déplacement est-ouest. Avec l’installation d’une

esplanade nord-sud, parallèle au fleuve, autour de laquelle se déploient les îlots de

construction, c’est une nouvelle organisation qui s’installe.

De nombreux habitants ont exprimé le sentiment d’être exclus du projet.

Nous avons donc réfléchi aux moyens d’accompagner la transformation radicale du

site pour faciliter cette mutation, prévue sur quinze ans. Nos moyens restaient toutefois limités pour atteindre cet objectif. Le phasage du projet était déjà établi.

Un phasage tenait ainsi compte du calendrier prévisionnel des opérations à venir

sur les parcelles bordant l’esplanade ainsi que de l’arrivée du tramway.

Nous avons donc fait le choix de ne pas interférer dans un processus de projet déjà

largement engagé. Notre étude n’allait pas porter sur des « mesures correctives

» mais sur des compléments d’aménagements et des installations portant sur les

parties du site en attente de transformation.

Ces installations provisoires permettent d’accompagner « en douceur » les

transformations d’usage du site. L’objectif est d’intégrer les pratiques des habitants

dans ce passage progressif d’une organisation est-ouest à une organisation nordsud. Ils concernent tout à la fois des aménagements temporaires d’allées ou de

parvis, l’installation de jardins familiaux et partagés, de la mise en œuvre d’objets

évènementiels permettant de voir le site depuis un point haut et de la mise en

place de dispositifs d’information sur le projet. Ces aménagements et installations

provisoires seront remplacés, au fur et à mesure, par des aménagements plus

permanents. Une telle démarche permet d’explorer quelques leviers d’action du

côté de la transformation. En effet, le passage entre l’état existant et l’état projeté

est rarement pensé en tant que tel dans l’urbanisme courant. On privilégie les

images avant-après, sans s’inquiéter de ce qui se passe entre les deux. Ce que l’on

appelle le phasage est généralement déterminé par un ensemble de contraintes

techniques, économiques, voire politiques. Les potentiels de certains lieux,

les pratiques, parfois ténues, des habitants, échappent le plus souvent à cette

planification. Or le fait de tirer parti des situations existantes et des situations

intermédiaires qui peuvent surgir à certaines étapes de la transformation, permet

d’ouvrir le champ des possibles.

En abordant le phasage sous un angle qui ne serait plus exclusivement technique,

mais tout à la fois social, culturel et artistique, on s’offre la possibilité de générer

de nouvelles proximités, de nouveaux échanges. C’est une condition indispensable

pour permettre aux habitants de faire face aux transformations de leurs quartiers.

Mais aussi de la planète. Car les mutations en cours sont imprévisibles. Il est

nécessaire aujourd’hui d’être très attentifs aux initiatives micro-économiques

et aux évolutions imperceptibles qui font, par exemple, que l’habitat se mêle au

travail ou que les frontières s’effacent entre approvisionnement, production et

distribution.

Repères biographiques

• 1990 : Obtention de son diplôme d’architecte DPLG à l’Ecole Nationale

Supérieure d’Architecture de Nancy.

• 1996-2004 : Chercheur au Laboratoire d’histoire de l’architecture

contemporaine (LHAC) à l’Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de

Nancy.

• 2002 : Ouverture de son agence « atelier Landauer architecture +

urbanisme » dans le 14ème arrondissement de Paris.

• 2004 : Obtention de son doctorat en histoire de l’architecture à l’Université

de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.

• Depuis 2007 : Enseignant titulaire à l’Ecole d’architecture, de la ville et des

territoires à Marne-la-Vallée et chercheur à l’Observatoire de la condition

suburbaine.

• 2009 : Parution de son ouvrage « L’architecte, la ville et la sécurité » aux

éditions PUF.

• 2010 : Parution de son ouvrage « L’invention du grand ensemble » aux

éditions Picard.

• 2011 : Parution de son ouvrage, coécrit avec Dominique Lefrançois, « Emile

Aillaud, carnet d’architectes » aux éditions du Patrimoine.

• Depuis 2013 : Dirige l’Observatoire de la condition suburbaine à l’Ecole

d’architecture, de la ville et des territoires à Marne-la-Vallée.

Les grands ensembles sont des terres d’avenir ! Sans interrogation mais avec

affirmation, Paul Landauer souhaite nous montrer, à partir de son expérience,

comment les grands ensembles ont pris, depuis leur construction, toute leur place

dans la fabrique de la ville et comment ils peuvent devenir les pionniers d’une

nouvelle façon de transformer la ville.

Pour cet architecte, docteur en histoire de l’architecture, pas de rupture entre

la recherche, l’enseignement et la conception de projets urbains. De Toulouse à

Strasbourg, en passant par Fosses, Besançon, Brest, Nemours, Mourenx ou Chalonsen Champagne, il lie tous ces registres.

Au commencement de toute pratique, un regard sur les territoires mais aussi sur

les hommes et les femmes qui l’habitent... Ce regard, Paul Landauer va l’exercer sur

de nombreux territoires, comme historien, comme architecte-urbaniste, mais aussi

comme animateur d’ateliers urbains, un exercice qu’il affectionne particulièrement.

C’est cette qualité dans les expertises croisées et multiples qui le conduit à être

reconnu comme un des spécialistes des grands ensembles. C’est porté par sa

conviction que le savoir doit se transmettre, qu’il va être l’auteur de plusieurs livres

et expositions dans le domaine de l’histoire de l’habitat et de la perception des

territoires de la banlieue par les photographes.

Il s’engage également contre la place grandissante qu’a prise la sécurité dans les

projets urbains. Il s’attache, dans plusieurs ouvrages, à dénoncer les incidences des

dispositifs de contrôle, de surveillance et d’évitement dans la conception de la ville

et à revendiquer le maintien d’un espace public favorisant la rencontre et l’initiative.

Il réalise notamment une place publique – avec des bancs ! – dans le quartier réputé

insécure de Lambezellec à Brest et démontre ainsi comment l’aménagement de lieux

ouverts, sans a priori sur ce qu’ils vont accueillir, peut constituer une alternative

aux grilles et aux contrôles d’accès pour rassurer les habitants. En 2008, le Forum

français de la sécurité urbaine et l’Acsé lui décernent un prix pour cette réalisation.

Paul Landauer, c’est une manière unique de regarder la diversité des territoires,

dans leur globalité, dans leurs résonnances les uns avec les autres, mais surtout

de les interpréter avec humanisme, replaçant la question de la valorisation et de

la transformation des situations existantes comme fonction essentielle du projet.

Ni critique ni nostalgique en retraçant l’histoire des grands ensembles. Mais une

mise en perspective de tous les potentiels humains et urbains qui les composent.

Ce qu’il nous propose, c’est une autre manière de concevoir la place de l’habitant

dans la ville, pour que celui-ci soit toujours en capacité d’interaction et d’autodétermination pour faire face aux enjeux de notre époque. Urbanisme - l'Apres 1945 @ 2 millions de logements a créer en urgençe..45 pour cent du parc locatif bombardé.. « Ginny » vu par l’urbaniste Nicolas Monnot @ les grands-ensembles www.arte.tv/fr/videos/082309-000-A/ginny-vu-par-l-urbanis...

sig.ville.gouv.fr/atlas/ZUS/ La matrice des G.E. s'est développée au lendemain de la guerre, lors de la reconstruction, mais ses origines de 1930, en France (Cité de la Muette à Drancy, quartier des Gratte-ciel à Villeurbanne).Gilles Ragot, historien de l'art, maître de recherche içi www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEBfg4vXNOM …Dès la fin de la seconde guerre mondiale, Eugène Claudius-Petit, éminent ministre de la reconstruction (1948-1952) déclare qu'il faut avoir une politique de "construction et non seulement de reconstruction". Nourri des thèses du Mouvement Moderne (la Charte d'Athènes est publiée en 1943), Claudius-Petit plaide pour une politique ambitieuse de logement social qu'il ne peut dissocier d'une réforme complète de la ville traditionnelle. www.citedelarchitecture.fr/fr/video/de-la-reconstruction-... Les 30 Glorieuses . com et la carte postale.l'UNION SOCIALE POUR L HABITAT fete ses 90 ans "TOUT savoir tout voir, tout connaitre, sur le LOGEMENT SOCIAL des HLM aux HBM avec le Musée HLM" en ligne sur le WEB içi www.banquedesterritoires.fr/lunion-sociale-pour-lhabitat-... … De grandes barres d’immeubles, appelées les grands ensembles, sont le symbole de nos banlieues. Entrée Libre revient sur le phénomène de destruction de ces bâtiments qui reflètent aujourd’hui la misere www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCqHBP5SBiM

Difficult to get a decent shot on the last tour, this was about the best at the Swansea stop!

its difficult to be a good sometimes.

 

be kind,

be polite,

be gracious,

be happy,

be forgiving,

be generous,

be loving,

be cheerful,

be positive,

be filial,

be friendly,

 

the list could go on.

 

you will at some point.

stab yourself...

 

for better and larger view

View On Black

The true essence of an Amish general store is captured at the Honeyville General Store. It might be a little difficult to find Honeyville, also known as Shrock. In fact, you might not see Honeyville on the map. But it`s worth the search. It`s at the intersection of County Road 400 south and 950 west in LaGrange County.

Difficult to get a decent shot without the shadow on this one!

 

A new one on me, I parked next to this earlier today without the faintest idea what it was(not a common occurence for me!).

 

Once back home, I resorted to Googling 'Levin' which was the only identifiying marker on the car and it turns out to be Toyota Corolla based.

 

I'm assuming this is a Japanese import, as I don't recall these being offered in the UK.

The access to the Bunker Altkirch is currently a bit difficult to reach. Switzerland, Jan 22, 2019. (2/2)

It is difficult to overestimate the importance of teachers 👨🏫 in the life of every person.

Thanks to them, we discover new talents in ourselves, gain knowledge, and learn to communicate… In general, being a teacher is a huge responsibility!

As the great Russian writer N.V. Gogol said: "In order to educate another, we must educate ourselves first of all," so to teach is to learn doubly...

Thank you to our dear ♥️ teachers for their noble work!

I heartily congratulate everyone involved on the professional holiday! Inexhaustible inspiration, diligent students, spiritual strength, warmth and comfort 💐

#organizingphotosessions #photographingMoscow #portraitMoscow #photoshootMoscow #eye #face #flower #green #hair #head #peopleinnature #plant #skin #smile #NikonD4 #safronoviv_photo

When difficult topics are made easy to understand:Young European Ambassadors from Armenia went to Gyumri and offered free coffee to the visitors of Aregak first inclusive cafe and bakery in special cups bearing stickers with basic human rights and a QR code leading to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

=> Meet Young European Ambassadors from Armenia: www.euneighbours.eu/en/east/eu-in-action/youth/young-euro...

  

=> Join the Young European Neighbours Network on Facebook: www.facebook.com/groups/1762832023967493

 

=> More about the event: www.euneighbours.eu/en/east/stay-informed/news/armenia-yo...

 

#EU4youth #EU4Armenia #strongertogether

difficult to photograph as it shows through both sides, but this is a mid 1990's Co-op Retail Services (CRS) design carrier bag from the food stores.

New mum Mattina had sore breasts early on during breastfeeding with new baby Arabella, and said.. “ it was difficult the first few months”.

(further pictures and information (if the language is not too difficult to understand) you can see by clicking on the link at the end of page!)

Keglevic Palace

Coordinates: 48 ° 08 ' 31.06 " N, 17 ° 06 ' 24.22" E

Keglevic palace in Panská 27

Entrance portal Keglevičovho Palace

View from Ventúrska

Keglevic Palace (Palace Keglevich) is a baroque palace in Bratislava at Panska 27 located in the state of urban conservation area and the list of cultural monuments. In 1998, the reconstruction was performed in which ceilings, roof, doors and windows, plaster and roofing were exchanged. Keglevičovho palace arose Straka street, located between Ventúrska and Hviezdoslav Square.

History

This two-story baroque palace of Count Turnianska County Joseph Keglevic (Keglevich) was built in the first half of the 18th century on two medieval plots using masonry from previous Late or ranorenesančných buildings. At that time belonged to the relatively large palatial buildings with four-wing disposition, which stretched up to the walls of the medieval town fortifications. Sometimes a third of 19 century by today's Hviezdoslavovo square of the object separated and remained only three-winged palace. On the ground floor of the west wing to maintain a late ctenoid star-vault from the 16th century. On the east side of the building is a buttress, which originally belonged to another building. The palace building has a footprint U-shaped representations staircase leads to the first floor. Wings of the courtyard are connected to corridor. Facade structure Hermová pilasters with stylized capitals. Portal with pilasters and cornice with segmental lining the seated statues of lions. The portal is decorated with the coat of arms of the builder - Count Joseph Keglevic. Plastic coat of arms over the portal has a red heel shield and two silver stripes. The upper blue field are directly opposite each other two golden lions holding between them a sword with a gold handle, which is nastoknutá crown with nine beads, which points to the county title wearer's coat of arms. Deväťperličková rank crown is repeated over the ridge, which branches decor green. Gender sign, lions, which were among the most popular heraldry, again quite deliberately used the sculptural decoration of the portal and thus intensified its decoration.

Owner of an old town house in the years 1601-1608 S. Alter. Until the early 18th century house was replaced by a number of owners (in 1634 Thomas Baranay, 1646 by H. Ch. Pärtinger, who was the owner until 1656). Early 18th century Ladislav Petráň and his wife Zofia Ilaasová sold the house and the debt Gabriel Skariczovi and his wife Anne Sophia for 50 gold. 1730 Gabriel's widow sold the house Skariczovi Rosalia Amade Simonitsovej for 400 gold, which it sold in 1743 to adviser Joseph Duchon for 7000 gold. 15th February 1745 Joseph sold the house Duchon Countess Theresa Keglevičovej, genus. Tavonath out for 7000 gold.

In 1750 the owner of the palace became the son of Theresa Keglevičovej, Count Joseph I. Keglevic that it provided lodging for participants of the Assembly. Joseph Keglevic is notably mentioned as the owner of the palace even in 1764, and sources indicate only the name of the genus. It is therefore highly likely that Joseph Keglevic was the owner of the palace until his death in 1813. Subsequently, the palace became the property of his heirs - the widow and Charles Keglevic.

After adjustments and Baroque reconstruction Keglevic family owned until 1850, when it passed into the hands of families Palfi (Palffy). In 1850, belonged to Mary Palfiová and in the years 1880 to 1911 it was in the possession of Count Stephen Palfi.

Keglevic family came from Croatia. Played an important role in Croatian history in the 16th century. One of the most famous family ancestors was George III., who lived in the 16th century. Had two sons - Peter and Nicholas. Peter was the founder of the Croatian branch and Nicholas of the Hungarian branch of the family. In 1646, Nicholas received peerage of Baron in 1687 (August 4), along with his brother Peter title of Count .

Owner Joseph I. Keglevic palace was in 1732 Místodržitelský counselor, mentor inner secret council, the guardian of the royal crown, nadžupanom (Lieutenant) Tornianskej County (stool). His son Joseph was Secretary of the Vice-Regency Council, Councillor Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and the guardian of the royal crown.

Among the former inhabitants of the palace at the turn of the 18th and 19 century is today probably the most famous and most interesting Anna Louise Barbora Keglevičová (Babetta - 1780-1813), daughter of Charles and Catherine Keglevic Zičiove. She was a private pupil of Ludwig van Beethoven in Vienna and the genius of music gave her a few of his songs, for example, during his visit to Bratislava 17 - 23 novembra 1796t then van Beethoven concerts precisely Keglevičovom palace and his hostess, Countess Anne Louise Keglevičovej, dedicated his Sonata for Piano in E flat major opus 7 and many other songs.

sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keglevi%C4%8Dov_pal%C3%A1c

1 2 ••• 28 29 31 33 34 ••• 79 80