View allAll Photos Tagged tiktok...
New on TikTok: ️ Episode Title: Special Residence Permit: The Bologna Court Recognizes Protection Based on Integration 🎧 Episode Script: Welcome to a new episode of Diritto dell’Immigrazione, the podcast presented by lawyer Fabio Loscerbo. Today, we’ll discuss a significant ruling by the Court of Bologna, which once again confirms special protection as a legal safeguard of the right to private and family life when a foreign national demonstrates genuine integration in Italy. The case concerns a Moroccan citizen, assisted by myself, who had been denied a residence permit for special protection by the Modena Police Headquarters. The man has lived in Italy for over three years, works regularly as a construction worker, speaks Italian, and lives with his brother, who holds a residence permit for work reasons. Despite this clear and well-documented integration process, his application had been rejected. With a ruling issued on October 24, 2025, under general docket number 9812 of 2024, the Court of Bologna – Specialized Section for Immigration and International Protection – upheld the appeal, stating that: “Employment, social, and family integration constitute a form of private life deserving protection under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 19 of the Consolidated Immigration Act.” The Court reaffirmed that special protection must be granted when the removal of a foreign national would violate their right to private and family life. In this case, the applicant had shown real and stable integration: regular employment, economic independence, family ties, and participation in language and training courses. The ruling also referred to two key precedents of the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione): the United Sections’ judgment number 24413 of 2021 and order number 7861 of 2022, which clarified that integration in Italy — even in just one of its forms, whether family, social, or work-related — may constitute grounds for special protection. The Court therefore ordered the competent Police Headquarters to issue a two-year residence permit for special protection, renewable and convertible into a work permit. This recognition confirms that integration is not only a social path but a legal value protected by the legal system. The message emerging from this ruling is clear: those who build their lives in Italy — who work, learn, and integrate — deserve to be protected. Immigration law today is, more than ever, the law of integration. I’m lawyer Fabio Loscerbo, and I thank you for joining me in this episode of Diritto dell’Immigrazione. See you in the next episode! ift.tt/BLr52UC ️ Episode Title: Special Residence Permit: The Bologna Court Recognizes Protection Based on Integration 🎧 Episode Script: Welcome to a new episode of Diritto dell’Immigrazione, the podcast presented by lawyer Fabio Loscerbo. Today, we’ll discuss a significant ruling by the Court of Bologna, which once again confirms special protection as a legal safeguard of the right to private and family life when a foreign national demonstrates genuine integration in Italy. The case concerns a Moroccan citizen, assisted by myself, who had been denied a residence permit for special protection by the Modena Police Headquarters. The man has lived in Italy for over three years, works regularly as a construction worker, speaks Italian, and lives with his brother, who holds a residence permit for work reasons. Despite this clear and well-documented integration process, his application had been rejected. With a ruling issued on October 24, 2025, under general docket number 9812 of 2024, the Court of Bologna – Specialized Section for Immigration and International Protection – upheld the appeal, stating that: “Employment, social, and family integration constitute a form of private life deserving protection under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 19 of the Consolidated Immigration Act.” The Court reaffirmed that special protection must be granted when the removal of a foreign national would violate their right to private and family life. In this case, the applicant had shown real and stable integration: regular employment, economic independence, family ties, and participation in language and training courses. The ruling also referred to two key precedents of the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione): the United Sections’ judgment number 24413 of 2021 and order number 7861 of 2022, which clarified that integration in Italy — even in just one of its forms, whether family, social, or work-related — may constitute grounds for special protection. The Court therefore ordered the competent Police Headquarters to issue a two-year residence permit for special protection, renewable and convertible into a work permit. This recognition confirms that integration is not only a social path but a legal value protected by the legal system. The message emerging from this ruling is clear: those who build their lives in Italy — who work, learn, and integrate — deserve to be protected. Immigration law today is, more than ever, the law of integration. I’m lawyer Fabio Loscerbo, and I thank you for joining me in this episode of Diritto dell’Immigrazione. See you in the next episode!
@instagram_JKT48 : From jkt48michelle: Gatau mau ksh caption apa😜 . . . . . . #tiktok #tiktokindo #tiktokseleb #tiktokidola #tiktoksea @tiktok.generationss @tiktok_sea @tiktokofficialindonesia @tiktok.indo t.co/RnE2z4Yzb9 t.co/EWvRHAbSVf (via Twitter twitter.com/instagram_JKT48/status/1025292211460571136)
New on TikTok: Residence Permit for Minor Assistance and Family Balancing: What the TAR Campania Says Good morning, I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo and this is a new episode of the podcast “Immigration Law”. Today we examine a particularly significant decision by the Regional Administrative Court of Campania, Sixth Section, published on 9 July 2025, with number 5148 of the year 2025, concerning the revocation of a residence permit for employment reasons issued by the Police Headquarters of Benevento. It is a case that clarifies a crucial point: when family ties are involved—especially those concerning a minor—the administration must perform a genuine balancing assessment between the public interest and the protection of family life. In this case, the Police Headquarters had revoked the residence permit, considering the declared employment relationship fictitious, since the company where the foreign citizen was supposedly employed did not exist. The applicant, however, demonstrated her family situation: she is the mother of a young child living in Italy and part of a fragile domestic context due to the father’s health conditions. The administration argued that this situation could be addressed through the residence permit for minor assistance, the instrument provided under Article 31 of the Italian Immigration Act. In other words, the Police Headquarters believed that maintaining the employment-based permit was unnecessary, as the woman could resort to this alternative form of protection. The Regional Administrative Court rejected this approach. According to well-established case law—also reaffirmed by the Council of State, Third Section, in its decision of 24 June 2022, number 5210—the administration, when examining the issuance, renewal, or revocation of any residence permit, must concretely evaluate the individual’s family ties, and cannot delegate this constitutional obligation to alternative legal institutions. The Court also clarified the function of the minor-assistance permit. It serves a very specific purpose: it is granted “for serious reasons connected to the psychological and physical development of the minor” and it is revocable when those conditions cease. It cannot be used as an automatic replacement for an ordinary residence permit based on stable family life, nor can it serve as a shortcut to bypass the legally required balancing exercise. The core of the ruling is clear: the protection of family unity requires a concrete, current and complete evaluation. Since the Police Headquarters failed to perform this assessment, the revocation was deemed unlawful and annulled. The decision also recalls Article 22 of the Italian Immigration Act, noting that the loss of employment does not automatically lead to the revocation of a residence permit, and that the individual has the right to a minimum period in which to seek new employment. This is an important ruling, relevant to all situations where the administration attempts procedural shortcuts, overlooking the family reality and the needs of the minor involved. Immigration is never a purely bureaucratic matter: it concerns personal histories, parental responsibilities and integration processes that the legal system protects with precision. I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo. Thank you for listening to this new episode of the podcast “Immigration Law”. We will meet again soon for another in-depth analysis. ift.tt/mnUIWK5 Residence Permit for Minor Assistance and Family Balancing: What the TAR Campania Says Good morning, I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo and this is a new episode of the podcast “Immigration Law”. Today we examine a particularly significant decision by the Regional Administrative Court of Campania, Sixth Section, published on 9 July 2025, with number 5148 of the year 2025, concerning the revocation of a residence permit for employment reasons issued by the Police Headquarters of Benevento. It is a case that clarifies a crucial point: when family ties are involved—especially those concerning a minor—the administration must perform a genuine balancing assessment between the public interest and the protection of family life. In this case, the Police Headquarters had revoked the residence permit, considering the declared employment relationship fictitious, since the company where the foreign citizen was supposedly employed did not exist. The applicant, however, demonstrated her family situation: she is the mother of a young child living in Italy and part of a fragile domestic context due to the father’s health conditions. The administration argued that this situation could be addressed through the residence permit for minor assistance, the instrument provided under Article 31 of the Italian Immigration Act. In other words, the Police Headquarters believed that maintaining the employment-based permit was unnecessary, as the woman could resort to this alternative form of protection. The Regional Administrative Court rejected this approach. According to well-established case law—also reaffirmed by the Council of State, Third Section, in its decision of 24 June 2022, number 5210—the administration, when examining the issuance, renewal, or revocation of any residence permit, must concretely evaluate the individual’s family ties, and cannot delegate this constitutional obligation to alternative legal institutions. The Court also clarified the function of the minor-assistance permit. It serves a very specific purpose: it is granted “for serious reasons connected to the psychological and physical development of the minor” and it is revocable when those conditions cease. It cannot be used as an automatic replacement for an ordinary residence permit based on stable family life, nor can it serve as a shortcut to bypass the legally required balancing exercise. The core of the ruling is clear: the protection of family unity requires a concrete, current and complete evaluation. Since the Police Headquarters failed to perform this assessment, the revocation was deemed unlawful and annulled. The decision also recalls Article 22 of the Italian Immigration Act, noting that the loss of employment does not automatically lead to the revocation of a residence permit, and that the individual has the right to a minimum period in which to seek new employment. This is an important ruling, relevant to all situations where the administration attempts procedural shortcuts, overlooking the family reality and the needs of the minor involved. Immigration is never a purely bureaucratic matter: it concerns personal histories, parental responsibilities and integration processes that the legal system protects with precision. I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo. Thank you for listening to this new episode of the podcast “Immigration Law”. We will meet again soon for another in-depth analysis.
Tiktok kod eski numarama gidiyor, tiktok doğrulama kodu eski numaraya gidiyor ve tiktok numaramı nasıl kaldırabilirim gibi soru ve şikayetler üzerine bilgilendirici bir yazı hazırlamaya karar verdik. Tiktok dünyaca ünlü video hazırlama, paylaşma ve canlı yayın yapmaya imkan sağlayan en büyük sosyal medya platformlarından biridir.
Tiktok 2015 yılında hayatımıza giren ve teknolojinin gelişmesiyle sürekli gelişen ve kullanıcı sayısını arttıran en büyük sosyal medya uygulamalarından biridir. Tiktokda çocuk, genç ve yaşlı bir çok kullanıcı çektikleri birbirinden farklı videoları takipçileriyle paylaşmaktadır. Son yıllarda uygulamaya yapılan güncellemeler sayesinde artık tiktokda para kazanmakta mümkün hale gelmiştir. Bu konu hakkında daha detaylı bilgi için Tiktok’tan Para Kazanma Yolları adlı makalemizi okuyabilirsiniz.
Doğrulama Kodu Eski Numarama Gidiyor Çözümü
Sosyal medya uygulamaları hayatımıza girdiğinden günümüze kadar olan sürekçe sürekli güncellenmektedir. Artık sosyal medya uygulamalarına girişte mail yerine daha çok cep telefonu numaraları kullanılmaktadır. Tiktok başta olmak üzere instagram ve facebook gibi diğer büyük platformlara da yine cep telefonu numaranızla giriş yapabilmektesiniz.
Tiktok cep telefonu numarası kullanımında bazı kullanıcıların doğrulama kodu eski numarama gidiyor ve tiktok telefon numarası değiştirme gibi sorunlar yaşadığını gördük.
VIDÉO. Décès de Adamo annoncé sur TikTok : "Sénégal guep gnongui may wo dima…"
galsenpeople.com/video-deces-de-adamo-annonce-sur-tiktok-...