View allAll Photos Tagged tiktok...
🎥 B-Day Recap Video youtu.be/f3NF432oEzs
*Sing Movie Theme*
✩ f o l l o w ➭ A L A I A ✩
Subscribe to @HiAlaia Youtube Channel ➭ www.youtube.com/@HiAlaia
Instagram ➭ www.instagram.com/HiAlaia
TikTok ➭ www.tiktok.com/@hialaiashow
Facebook ➭ www.facebook.com/HiAlaiaShow
Website ➭ bit.ly/HiAlaiaWebsite
Photos ➭ www.flickr.com/photos/hialaia/
👋 Hi Alaia 🌺 follows Alaia on her everyday life experiences. Join Alaia as she showcases a wide range of engaging life activities that explore learning, traveling, educational, motivational topics and much more. Come along with Alaia as she takes a real life journey around the world with family and friends.
For Business and Promotional Inquiries:
HiAlaia@yahoo.com
#HiAlaia #HiAlaiaShow HiAlaia.com #Hi #Alaia #Alaïa #AlaiaHi
Looking for a delicious and easy pasta dish recipe ideas? Look no further than TikTok Feta Pasta! This recipe is simple to follow, and the end result is a flavorful and hearty meal that the whole family will love.
TikTok призупинив роботу в РФ через ухвалення закону про кримінальну відповідальність за "фейки" про російську армію
Майданчик для творчості та розваг китайський TikTok заявив про припинення роботи в Росії через запровадження кримінальної відповідальності за "фейки" про російську армію. Соцмережа вирішила не наражати на небезпеку життя своїх працівників і користувачів, передає DROBRO.
"У нас немає іншого вибору, окрім як призупинити пряму трансляцію та новий контент для нашого відеосервісу", - зазначено у повідомленні.
Поки що експерти соцмережі вивчають новий закон Росії для розуміння ризиків та оцінки перспектив відновлення роботи. Раніше в Росії заборонили роботу Facebook, Twitter та суттєво "зачистили" медіаринок. Російська влада остаточно "видавила" всі демократичні ЗМІ, залишивши працювати виключно підконтрольні Кремлю пропагандистські інформагентства та телеканали.
YouTube www.youtube.com/@katsuOfficial
TikTok www.tiktok.com/@katsu_beat
instagram www.instagram.com/kermit71
If you're a professional Tiktok user, then you can choose to be careful in your own public participation. Like every social media marketing, participation is which produce your accounts dwelling in the very long run. Therefore you should really consider your followers behaviour is vital.
click here : bit.ly/2Ys5YRe
Social Media: A place for people to share themselves with the world and connect with friends, family, and those who have similar interests. To continue the social media saga is the social media app, TikTok. It continues the main purposes of all social networks, but in the form of short videos.
But is it safe to use? Here are some TikTok safety tips & features to consider.
Tanglikes.net cung cấp dịch vụ tăng view - lượt xem video Tiktok chất lượng, view thật.
Web: www.tanglikes.net/2021/07/dich-vu-tang-view-luot-xem-vide...
New on TikTok: Residence Permit for Minor Assistance and Family Balancing: What the TAR Campania Says Good morning, I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo and this is a new episode of the podcast “Immigration Law”. Today we examine a particularly significant decision by the Regional Administrative Court of Campania, Sixth Section, published on 9 July 2025, with number 5148 of the year 2025, concerning the revocation of a residence permit for employment reasons issued by the Police Headquarters of Benevento. It is a case that clarifies a crucial point: when family ties are involved—especially those concerning a minor—the administration must perform a genuine balancing assessment between the public interest and the protection of family life. In this case, the Police Headquarters had revoked the residence permit, considering the declared employment relationship fictitious, since the company where the foreign citizen was supposedly employed did not exist. The applicant, however, demonstrated her family situation: she is the mother of a young child living in Italy and part of a fragile domestic context due to the father’s health conditions. The administration argued that this situation could be addressed through the residence permit for minor assistance, the instrument provided under Article 31 of the Italian Immigration Act. In other words, the Police Headquarters believed that maintaining the employment-based permit was unnecessary, as the woman could resort to this alternative form of protection. The Regional Administrative Court rejected this approach. According to well-established case law—also reaffirmed by the Council of State, Third Section, in its decision of 24 June 2022, number 5210—the administration, when examining the issuance, renewal, or revocation of any residence permit, must concretely evaluate the individual’s family ties, and cannot delegate this constitutional obligation to alternative legal institutions. The Court also clarified the function of the minor-assistance permit. It serves a very specific purpose: it is granted “for serious reasons connected to the psychological and physical development of the minor” and it is revocable when those conditions cease. It cannot be used as an automatic replacement for an ordinary residence permit based on stable family life, nor can it serve as a shortcut to bypass the legally required balancing exercise. The core of the ruling is clear: the protection of family unity requires a concrete, current and complete evaluation. Since the Police Headquarters failed to perform this assessment, the revocation was deemed unlawful and annulled. The decision also recalls Article 22 of the Italian Immigration Act, noting that the loss of employment does not automatically lead to the revocation of a residence permit, and that the individual has the right to a minimum period in which to seek new employment. This is an important ruling, relevant to all situations where the administration attempts procedural shortcuts, overlooking the family reality and the needs of the minor involved. Immigration is never a purely bureaucratic matter: it concerns personal histories, parental responsibilities and integration processes that the legal system protects with precision. I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo. Thank you for listening to this new episode of the podcast “Immigration Law”. We will meet again soon for another in-depth analysis. ift.tt/mnUIWK5 Residence Permit for Minor Assistance and Family Balancing: What the TAR Campania Says Good morning, I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo and this is a new episode of the podcast “Immigration Law”. Today we examine a particularly significant decision by the Regional Administrative Court of Campania, Sixth Section, published on 9 July 2025, with number 5148 of the year 2025, concerning the revocation of a residence permit for employment reasons issued by the Police Headquarters of Benevento. It is a case that clarifies a crucial point: when family ties are involved—especially those concerning a minor—the administration must perform a genuine balancing assessment between the public interest and the protection of family life. In this case, the Police Headquarters had revoked the residence permit, considering the declared employment relationship fictitious, since the company where the foreign citizen was supposedly employed did not exist. The applicant, however, demonstrated her family situation: she is the mother of a young child living in Italy and part of a fragile domestic context due to the father’s health conditions. The administration argued that this situation could be addressed through the residence permit for minor assistance, the instrument provided under Article 31 of the Italian Immigration Act. In other words, the Police Headquarters believed that maintaining the employment-based permit was unnecessary, as the woman could resort to this alternative form of protection. The Regional Administrative Court rejected this approach. According to well-established case law—also reaffirmed by the Council of State, Third Section, in its decision of 24 June 2022, number 5210—the administration, when examining the issuance, renewal, or revocation of any residence permit, must concretely evaluate the individual’s family ties, and cannot delegate this constitutional obligation to alternative legal institutions. The Court also clarified the function of the minor-assistance permit. It serves a very specific purpose: it is granted “for serious reasons connected to the psychological and physical development of the minor” and it is revocable when those conditions cease. It cannot be used as an automatic replacement for an ordinary residence permit based on stable family life, nor can it serve as a shortcut to bypass the legally required balancing exercise. The core of the ruling is clear: the protection of family unity requires a concrete, current and complete evaluation. Since the Police Headquarters failed to perform this assessment, the revocation was deemed unlawful and annulled. The decision also recalls Article 22 of the Italian Immigration Act, noting that the loss of employment does not automatically lead to the revocation of a residence permit, and that the individual has the right to a minimum period in which to seek new employment. This is an important ruling, relevant to all situations where the administration attempts procedural shortcuts, overlooking the family reality and the needs of the minor involved. Immigration is never a purely bureaucratic matter: it concerns personal histories, parental responsibilities and integration processes that the legal system protects with precision. I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo. Thank you for listening to this new episode of the podcast “Immigration Law”. We will meet again soon for another in-depth analysis.
Really need to recognize the way to get unfastened TikTok Fans. There are a couple of methods to get fans free of charge the first actual and actual manner is to position thrilling movies the extra thrilling videos you`ll supply to the arena there may be the extra recognition charge and extra human beings will watch and begin following you and you will get extra hearts in go back for your movies.
Please visit your site here :
As the set of rules or TikTok is such that with any video which you proportion online will mechanically get to the arena then if its captive additionally human beings will begin following proper away and your video may be boosted. If you are attempting your high quality and you're capable of getting into the opposition as human beings don`t comply with in any case you then definitely want a writer that may generate unfastened limitless fans for you on TikTok.
Nuevo capítulo del tira y afloja entre la Autoridad de Privacidad y la red social china.
La Autoridad de Protección de Datos envía una fuerte señal a TikTok. La Autoridad, con una medida de emergencia adoptada el 7 de julio, advirtió a la plataforma que es ilegal utilizar los datos personales almacenados en los dispositivos de los usuarios para perfilarlos y enviarles publicidad personalizada en ausencia de consentimiento explícito. El tira y afloja entre la autoridad garante y la red social china continúa.
Qué sucedió
El objeto de la disputa, esta vez, es la comunicación de TikTok a sus usuarios de que a partir del 13 de julio, las personas mayores de 18 años habrían sido alcanzadas por la publicidad "personalizada", es decir, basada en el perfilado del comportamiento en navegación en TikTok. La comunicación que tuvo lugar en las últimas semanas estuvo precedida por un cambio en la política de privacidad en el que, según el Garante italiano, se reemplazó el consentimiento de los interesados por "intereses legítimos" de TikTok y sus socios.El Garante había iniciado de inmediato una investigación sobre la modificación de la política de privacidad y solicitó información a la red social. La Autoridad ha concluido ahora que «este cambio en la base legal es incompatible con la directiva europea 2002/58, la llamada directiva “ePrivacy”, y con el art. 122 del Código en materia de protección de datos personales (que
www.pagina12web.com.ar/detener-la-publicidad-personalizad...
London, UK, 20th January 2026, Winter Lights at Canary Wharf is now open, its the 10th edition. With 16 spectacular light installations by acclaimed artists
from around the world. Number 16 Amplitudes by Limbic Cinema, UK. The Winter Lights is on until 31st January 2026.
Photography Journal on Substack |
Website |
Tiktok |
Threads |
Medium |
Bluesky |
Facebook |
All photographs © Andrew Lalchan
New on TikTok: ️ Title: Revocation of Long-Term Residence Permit and Prolonged Absence: When Illness Justifies a Late Return to Italy I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo, and this is a new episode of the Immigration Law podcast. Today we discuss a judgment of the Regional Administrative Court for Friuli Venezia Giulia, First Section, number 381 of 2025, published on September 13, 2025, which addresses a crucial issue: the revocation of a long-term residence permit due to absence from the European Union for more than twelve consecutive months. The case concerns a Tunisian citizen who had been living in Italy since 2001 and held a long-term residence permit for employment purposes. The Police Headquarters of Pordenone revoked his residence permit, claiming that he had remained abroad — in Tunisia — for over a year between 2017 and 2019. The authorities also rejected his request to update the residence document, disregarding the medical certificates he had presented to justify his absence, caused by a serious health condition that required prolonged treatment. The applicant appealed the decision, arguing that the administration had ignored his explanations, violated the principles of proportionality and good administration, and failed to consider his strong integration in Italy and his long residence in the country. The TAR Friuli Venezia Giulia, in its judgment no. 381 of 2025, annulled the decision of the Police Headquarters. The Court stated that Article 9, paragraph 7, letter (d), of Legislative Decree no. 286 of 1998 — which allows for the revocation of a long-term residence permit after twelve months of uninterrupted absence from EU territory — must not be applied automatically. The administration, the Court explained, has a duty to assess whether there are serious and documented reasons, such as medical treatment or other exceptional circumstances, that justify the absence. The judges emphasized that a mechanical application of the rule would violate the principle of substantive equality and the constitutional and international guarantees protecting the fundamental rights of the individual. Therefore, the administration should have examined the medical documentation before proceeding with the revocation. The Court annulled the revocation order and required the administration to reassess the applicant’s situation, verifying whether the health-related reasons could legitimately justify the period spent abroad. The costs were compensated due to the existing differences in case law on this issue. This decision reaffirms a fundamental principle: the long-term residence permit cannot be revoked automatically. Public authorities must always evaluate the specific personal circumstances of the foreign national, especially when illness or other serious causes are involved. This was Immigration Law. I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo, and I invite you to follow the next episodes. ift.tt/1sv6lEi ️ Title: Revocation of Long-Term Residence Permit and Prolonged Absence: When Illness Justifies a Late Return to Italy I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo, and this is a new episode of the Immigration Law podcast. Today we discuss a judgment of the Regional Administrative Court for Friuli Venezia Giulia, First Section, number 381 of 2025, published on September 13, 2025, which addresses a crucial issue: the revocation of a long-term residence permit due to absence from the European Union for more than twelve consecutive months. The case concerns a Tunisian citizen who had been living in Italy since 2001 and held a long-term residence permit for employment purposes. The Police Headquarters of Pordenone revoked his residence permit, claiming that he had remained abroad — in Tunisia — for over a year between 2017 and 2019. The authorities also rejected his request to update the residence document, disregarding the medical certificates he had presented to justify his absence, caused by a serious health condition that required prolonged treatment. The applicant appealed the decision, arguing that the administration had ignored his explanations, violated the principles of proportionality and good administration, and failed to consider his strong integration in Italy and his long residence in the country. The TAR Friuli Venezia Giulia, in its judgment no. 381 of 2025, annulled the decision of the Police Headquarters. The Court stated that Article 9, paragraph 7, letter (d), of Legislative Decree no. 286 of 1998 — which allows for the revocation of a long-term residence permit after twelve months of uninterrupted absence from EU territory — must not be applied automatically. The administration, the Court explained, has a duty to assess whether there are serious and documented reasons, such as medical treatment or other exceptional circumstances, that justify the absence. The judges emphasized that a mechanical application of the rule would violate the principle of substantive equality and the constitutional and international guarantees protecting the fundamental rights of the individual. Therefore, the administration should have examined the medical documentation before proceeding with the revocation. The Court annulled the revocation order and required the administration to reassess the applicant’s situation, verifying whether the health-related reasons could legitimately justify the period spent abroad. The costs were compensated due to the existing differences in case law on this issue. This decision reaffirms a fundamental principle: the long-term residence permit cannot be revoked automatically. Public authorities must always evaluate the specific personal circumstances of the foreign national, especially when illness or other serious causes are involved. This was Immigration Law. I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo, and I invite you to follow the next episodes.