View allAll Photos Tagged tiktok...
So sánh giữa chạy quảng cáo TikTok ads hiệu quả & các nền tảng quảng cáo khác:
Điểm khác biệt của Tiktok Ads:
Nội dung chạy quảng cáo là dạng video từ 5s-60s.
Cơ chế tính tiền quảng cáo theo CPM (có cả CPC nhưng chủ yếu mọi người đều chạy CPM).
Tệp đối khách hàng chủ yếu ở độ tuổi 18-35.
Cơ chế duyệt quảng cáo vừa là máy, vừa là người.
Điểm giống so với các nền tảng quảng cáo trước đây:
Cách target khách hàng khá đơn giản, tương tự như với Zalo.
Chính sách về các sản phẩm được cho phép chạy trên Tiktok khá giống với Facebook, những gì ở Facebook không chạy được thì tỷ lệ cao ở Tiktok cũng không chạy được
New on TikTok: ️ Podcast Title: When Integration Becomes Protection: The Bari Commission Recognizes Special Protection 🎧 Podcast Script (English version): Welcome to Immigration Law, the podcast hosted by Lawyer Fabio Loscerbo. Today, we’re talking about an important decision by the Territorial Commission of Bari, which granted special protection to a Moroccan citizen based on his strong and proven integration in Italy. The case started with an application for international protection, which was rejected because there were no grounds for persecution or serious harm in case of return. However, the Commission highlighted a crucial aspect: the applicant has been living and working in Italy for years, holds a rental contract, a stable job in the construction sector, maintains solid social relationships, and takes part in the local community’s life. The decision therefore emphasizes the principle of effective integration as a legally protected right under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees respect for private and family life. According to the Commission, deporting the applicant would have violated this right, as it would have broken a life path now firmly rooted in Italian society. This decision reaffirms a growing legal orientation: special protection is not a residual or secondary safeguard, but a legal instrument that upholds the very essence of human dignity—when a foreigner has built their home, their identity, and their future in Italy. In a system increasingly linking the right to stay to the concept of integration, this decision represents an important step toward a balanced and humane vision of immigration law, where social belonging becomes a legal right. I am Lawyer Fabio Loscerbo. Follow me on Spreaker, Amazon Music, and all my social channels to stay updated on cases, rulings, and news in immigration law. See you in the next episode of Immigration Law. ift.tt/zcEnC6P ️ Podcast Title: When Integration Becomes Protection: The Bari Commission Recognizes Special Protection 🎧 Podcast Script (English version): Welcome to Immigration Law, the podcast hosted by Lawyer Fabio Loscerbo. Today, we’re talking about an important decision by the Territorial Commission of Bari, which granted special protection to a Moroccan citizen based on his strong and proven integration in Italy. The case started with an application for international protection, which was rejected because there were no grounds for persecution or serious harm in case of return. However, the Commission highlighted a crucial aspect: the applicant has been living and working in Italy for years, holds a rental contract, a stable job in the construction sector, maintains solid social relationships, and takes part in the local community’s life. The decision therefore emphasizes the principle of effective integration as a legally protected right under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees respect for private and family life. According to the Commission, deporting the applicant would have violated this right, as it would have broken a life path now firmly rooted in Italian society. This decision reaffirms a growing legal orientation: special protection is not a residual or secondary safeguard, but a legal instrument that upholds the very essence of human dignity—when a foreigner has built their home, their identity, and their future in Italy. In a system increasingly linking the right to stay to the concept of integration, this decision represents an important step toward a balanced and humane vision of immigration law, where social belonging becomes a legal right. I am Lawyer Fabio Loscerbo. Follow me on Spreaker, Amazon Music, and all my social channels to stay updated on cases, rulings, and news in immigration law. See you in the next episode of Immigration Law.
View trên tiktok là số lượng người xem các video được thống kê bởi ứng dụng. Tiktok triệu view làm cụm từ để chỉ những video được nhiều người xem và chia sẻ.
Đây là những video hay và chất lượng trên tiktok được người dùng đánh giá cao. Nhưng nếu đang trong thời gian đầu kênh tiktok mới hình thành thì muốn video có nhiều lượt xem bạn nên sử dụng các dịch vụ tăng view tiktok.
Tại webhacklike chúng tôi có cung cấp dịch vụ hack view tiktok và Auto view tiktok.
Auto view tiktok là gì?
Auto view tiktok là sử dụng dịch vụ tại hệ thống của webhacklike nhằm tăng lượt xem video tiktok một cách tự động mỗi khi người dùng đăng video mới.
webhacklike.com/auto-view-tiktok
Điểm khác biệt giữa auto view tikotk và hack view tiktok
Auto view tiktok
Với auto view tiktok thì hệ thống sẽ tự động tăng lượt xem cho video mới đăng.
Người dùng chỉ việc lấy link kênh tiktok một lần mà không phải lấy link từng video.
Thanh toán nhanh chóng, tiện lợi cho nhiều video.
Hack view tiktok
Hệ thống chỉ tăng view cho video tiktok được lấy link
Người dùng phải lấy link từng video.
Thanh toán cho từng video, mỗi video là một đơn hàng.
New on TikTok: ️ Título: Revocación del permiso de residencia de larga duración y ausencia prolongada: cuando la enfermedad justifica el regreso tardío a Italia Soy el abogado Fabio Loscerbo, y este es un nuevo episodio del pódcast Derecho de la Inmigración. Hoy analizamos una sentencia del Tribunal Administrativo Regional de Friuli Venezia Giulia, Sección Primera, número 381 de 2025, publicada el 13 de septiembre de 2025, que aborda un tema crucial: la revocación del permiso de residencia de larga duración por ausencia del territorio de la Unión Europea superior a doce meses consecutivos. El caso se refiere a un ciudadano tunecino, residente en Italia desde 2001, titular de un permiso de residencia de larga duración por motivos de trabajo subordinado. La Jefatura de Policía de Pordenone revocó su permiso alegando que el interesado había permanecido en Túnez durante más de un año consecutivo, entre 2017 y 2019. Al mismo tiempo, rechazó la solicitud de actualización del documento de residencia, considerando irrelevante la documentación médica presentada para justificar la ausencia, motivada por una grave enfermedad que había requerido tratamientos prolongados. El solicitante recurrió la decisión, alegando que la Administración no había tenido en cuenta sus justificaciones y que la medida violaba los principios de proporcionalidad, razonabilidad y protección de la vida privada y familiar, así como los derechos fundamentales garantizados por la Constitución y los convenios internacionales. El TAR Friuli Venezia Giulia, mediante la sentencia número 381 de 2025, estimó el recurso y anuló la decisión de la Jefatura de Policía. El Tribunal aclaró que el artículo 9, párrafo 7, letra d), del Decreto Legislativo 286 de 1998 — que prevé la revocación del permiso de residencia de larga duración en caso de ausencia de la Unión Europea durante más de doce meses — no puede aplicarse de manera automática. La Administración tiene la obligación de valorar si existen motivos graves y documentados, como las condiciones de salud, que puedan justificar la ausencia prolongada. El juez subrayó que una interpretación rígida de la norma entraría en conflicto con el principio de igualdad sustancial y con el enfoque inclusivo que caracteriza el estatuto jurídico del extranjero. Además, aplicar la revocación de forma mecánica implicaría ignorar el derecho a la vida privada y familiar, que merece una protección efectiva también para quienes residen legalmente en Italia desde hace muchos años. Por todo ello, el TAR anuló la revocación y ordenó a la Administración reexaminar la situación del solicitante, valorando la documentación médica y verificando si las condiciones de salud podían justificar legítimamente el período de ausencia. Las costas del proceso fueron compensadas debido al contraste jurisprudencial existente sobre la materia. Esta decisión reafirma un principio fundamental: el permiso de residencia de larga duración no puede ser revocado automáticamente. Cada caso debe evaluarse individualmente, especialmente cuando se trata de enfermedades graves u otras circunstancias excepcionales que justifican una ausencia temporal del territorio nacional. Esto fue Derecho de la Inmigración. Soy el abogado Fabio Loscerbo, y los invito a seguir los próximos episodios. ift.tt/3OQFiZ9 ️ Título: Revocación del permiso de residencia de larga duración y ausencia prolongada: cuando la enfermedad justifica el regreso tardío a Italia Soy el abogado Fabio Loscerbo, y este es un nuevo episodio del pódcast Derecho de la Inmigración. Hoy analizamos una sentencia del Tribunal Administrativo Regional de Friuli Venezia Giulia, Sección Primera, número 381 de 2025, publicada el 13 de septiembre de 2025, que aborda un tema crucial: la revocación del permiso de residencia de larga duración por ausencia del territorio de la Unión Europea superior a doce meses consecutivos. El caso se refiere a un ciudadano tunecino, residente en Italia desde 2001, titular de un permiso de residencia de larga duración por motivos de trabajo subordinado. La Jefatura de Policía de Pordenone revocó su permiso alegando que el interesado había permanecido en Túnez durante más de un año consecutivo, entre 2017 y 2019. Al mismo tiempo, rechazó la solicitud de actualización del documento de residencia, considerando irrelevante la documentación médica presentada para justificar la ausencia, motivada por una grave enfermedad que había requerido tratamientos prolongados. El solicitante recurrió la decisión, alegando que la Administración no había tenido en cuenta sus justificaciones y que la medida violaba los principios de proporcionalidad, razonabilidad y protección de la vida privada y familiar, así como los derechos fundamentales garantizados por la Constitución y los convenios internacionales. El TAR Friuli Venezia Giulia, mediante la sentencia número 381 de 2025, estimó el recurso y anuló la decisión de la Jefatura de Policía. El Tribunal aclaró que el artículo 9, párrafo 7, letra d), del Decreto Legislativo 286 de 1998 — que prevé la revocación del permiso de residencia de larga duración en caso de ausencia de la Unión Europea durante más de doce meses — no puede aplicarse de manera automática. La Administración tiene la obligación de valorar si existen motivos graves y documentados, como las condiciones de salud, que puedan justificar la ausencia prolongada. El juez subrayó que una interpretación rígida de la norma entraría en conflicto con el principio de igualdad sustancial y con el enfoque inclusivo que caracteriza el estatuto jurídico del extranjero. Además, aplicar la revocación de forma mecánica implicaría ignorar el derecho a la vida privada y familiar, que merece una protección efectiva también para quienes residen legalmente en Italia desde hace muchos años. Por todo ello, el TAR anuló la revocación y ordenó a la Administración reexaminar la situación del solicitante, valorando la documentación médica y verificando si las condiciones de salud podían justificar legítimamente el período de ausencia. Las costas del proceso fueron compensadas debido al contraste jurisprudencial existente sobre la materia. Esta decisión reafirma un principio fundamental: el permiso de residencia de larga duración no puede ser revocado automáticamente. Cada caso debe evaluarse individualmente, especialmente cuando se trata de enfermedades graves u otras circunstancias excepcionales que justifican una ausencia temporal del territorio nacional. Esto fue Derecho de la Inmigración. Soy el abogado Fabio Loscerbo, y los invito a seguir los próximos episodios.
New on TikTok: Title of the episode: The case of the Iranian citizens and the denial of the renewal of a self-employment residence permit in decision 00972 of 2025 Podcast text (English version): Good morning, I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo, and this is a new episode of the podcast Immigration Law. Today we analyse an important decision issued by the Regional Administrative Court of Lombardy, Brescia division: decision number 00972 of 2025, published on thirty-one October two thousand and twenty-five, following deliberation in the chamber meeting of twenty-four September two thousand and twenty-five. The case concerns two Iranian citizens, a married couple holding a self-employment residence permit, who requested its renewal by submitting documentation relating to their participation in a limited liability company. However, the company was inactive and had recorded losses for several financial years. The Police Headquarters of Brescia therefore rejected both applications, considering that the applicants had failed to demonstrate the economic capacity required by law. The applicants challenged the rejections, arguing that the documents they had filed — together with the availability of funds in their bank accounts — were sufficient to prove their financial capacity. During the judicial proceedings, they also submitted additional documents, including bank statements and further records. Decision number 00972 of 2025 dismissed both appeals and clarified several key points for anyone dealing with self-employment permits. The Court reiterated that the renewal of this type of residence permit requires actual, current income deriving from lawful sources, at a level sufficient to ensure the sustenance of the foreign national and their family. Mere participation in a company is not enough, especially when that company is inactive or operating at a loss, and a non-productive asset — such as a residential property — cannot substitute proof of income. The judges also reaffirmed a fundamental principle: the public administration must base its assessment exclusively on documents that were known or could have been known during the administrative procedure. Documents produced only in court, even if they existed before the rejection, cannot be used to challenge the lawfulness of a decision that was properly motivated at the time it was adopted. This avoids any form of implicit “restoration of terms” not provided for by law. Another relevant point concerns the preliminary notice of rejection. The Police Headquarters issued one preliminary notice, to which the applicants responded. According to the Court, a second notice was not required: once the administration had examined the reply and deemed the additional documentation insufficient, it could legitimately proceed to reject the application. This decision therefore confirms a strict approach: in the field of self-employment, intentions, projects, and entrepreneurial plans still in their initial stage are not enough. Applicants must demonstrate real, current, and continuous income supported by complete documentation, submitted in due time to the administration. The case of these two Iranian citizens is emblematic of a consolidated interpretative trend that places strong emphasis on the concrete and sustainable nature of the foreign national’s stay. A trend that has become increasingly influential and that significantly affects those applying for the renewal of a self-employment residence permit. Thank you for listening. I look forward to welcoming you to the next episode of the podcast Immigration Law. ift.tt/lYm2tjA Title of the episode: The case of the Iranian citizens and the denial of the renewal of a self-employment residence permit in decision 00972 of 2025 Podcast text (English version): Good morning, I am lawyer Fabio Loscerbo, and this is a new episode of the podcast Immigration Law. Today we analyse an important decision issued by the Regional Administrative Court of Lombardy, Brescia division: decision number 00972 of 2025, published on thirty-one October two thousand and twenty-five, following deliberation in the chamber meeting of twenty-four September two thousand and twenty-five. The case concerns two Iranian citizens, a married couple holding a self-employment residence permit, who requested its renewal by submitting documentation relating to their participation in a limited liability company. However, the company was inactive and had recorded losses for several financial years. The Police Headquarters of Brescia therefore rejected both applications, considering that the applicants had failed to demonstrate the economic capacity required by law. The applicants challenged the rejections, arguing that the documents they had filed — together with the availability of funds in their bank accounts — were sufficient to prove their financial capacity. During the judicial proceedings, they also submitted additional documents, including bank statements and further records. Decision number 00972 of 2025 dismissed both appeals and clarified several key points for anyone dealing with self-employment permits. The Court reiterated that the renewal of this type of residence permit requires actual, current income deriving from lawful sources, at a level sufficient to ensure the sustenance of the foreign national and their family. Mere participation in a company is not enough, especially when that company is inactive or operating at a loss, and a non-productive asset — such as a residential property — cannot substitute proof of income. The judges also reaffirmed a fundamental principle: the public administration must base its assessment exclusively on documents that were known or could have been known during the administrative procedure. Documents produced only in court, even if they existed before the rejection, cannot be used to challenge the lawfulness of a decision that was properly motivated at the time it was adopted. This avoids any form of implicit “restoration of terms” not provided for by law. Another relevant point concerns the preliminary notice of rejection. The Police Headquarters issued one preliminary notice, to which the applicants responded. According to the Court, a second notice was not required: once the administration had examined the reply and deemed the additional documentation insufficient, it could legitimately proceed to reject the application. This decision therefore confirms a strict approach: in the field of self-employment, intentions, projects, and entrepreneurial plans still in their initial stage are not enough. Applicants must demonstrate real, current, and continuous income supported by complete documentation, submitted in due time to the administration. The case of these two Iranian citizens is emblematic of a consolidated interpretative trend that places strong emphasis on the concrete and sustainable nature of the foreign national’s stay. A trend that has become increasingly influential and that significantly affects those applying for the renewal of a self-employment residence permit. Thank you for listening. I look forward to welcoming you to the next episode of the podcast Immigration Law.
L'arte su TikTok segna un'apertura alle nuove generazioni. Il social amato dai ragazzi, infatti, viene sempre più spesso usato dai musei per avvicinare i giovani alla storia dell’arte e alla cultura in generale.
👉 www.riccardoconcettiblog.it/arte-su-tiktok/
#artesutiktok #riccardoconcetti #riccardoconcettiblog
Client: TikTok
Design: Divimove
Direction / Hardware / Software: Hackerloop
Software / Creativity: WILLPOWER STUDIOS
Venezia Radio TV: Televenezia
Foto di Maria Antonietta Massari
Seguici anche su Instagram e X su @veneziaradiotv
#tiktok @charliechange8 #effect
m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02PG2G9X7GsfcSrJ...
Viele junge Menschen verbringen einen großen Teil ihres Alltags in den sozialen Medien, was politische Entscheidungsträger:innen erkannt haben und nutzen, um ihre Botschaften gezielt an die junge Generation zu richten.
Welche Sorgen und Ängste junge Menschen bewegen, wie groß der Einfluss von Social Media auf ihre politische Meinungsbildung ist und ob wir eine Gebrauchsanweisung für TikTok, Insta & Co brauchen, diese und weitere Fragen haben wir zusammen mit unseren Gästen am 24.06.2024 in unserem hybriden Event diskutiert:
- Heidi Reichinnek, Gruppenvorsitzende der Gruppe Die Linke
- Fabian Funke, MdB SPD
- Muhanad Al-Halak, MdB FDP
- Jan Schipmann, Journalist / Host & Redaktionsleiter DIE DA OBEN (Moderation)
Mehr erfahren:
www.basecamp.digital/event/basecamp-fishbowl-brauchen-wir...
Fotos: Henrik Andree
At the age of 46, Bobby Moudy, a TikTok celebrity with more than a million followers, committed suicide. On social media, Moudy was known as "BobbySuxx" and was well-known for his absurd and hilarious films.
A note from Moudy's family thanking his followers for their support and requesting privacy during this difficult time was posted on his TikTok profile along with the news of his passing. Although the cause of death has not been determined, it is thought to be a suicide.
The TikTok community has been shocked by Moudy's passing; many of his followers have shared their favourite videos and offered their sympathies. The tragedy has also been utilised by others to promote awareness of suicide prevention and mental health issues.
In the wake of the COVID-19 epidemic, mental health is becoming a rising concern, which is why Moudy's passing occurs at this time. Increased stress and loneliness brought on by the epidemic have a significant negative influence on mental health.
Help is available if you or someone you know is having mental health problems or is contemplating suicide. For resources and help, call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255).
trendbursts.com/tiktok-star-bobby-moudy-dies-by-suicide-a...