View allAll Photos Tagged flash
Image created using two SB-28 flashes triggered wirelessly with CTR-301P remotes. Both flashes were gelled and white balance settings were varied.
View Large On Black (for Contacts) - or view with B l a c k M a g i c
Testing my new mini slave flash (Morris mini Slave Flash Plus), to try and remove the shadow created by having just one flash.
This photo is the "after", using both the on-camera flash and the slave.
I'm now on facebook, please like our page at www.facebook.com/CrypsisNaturePhotography
The Stones tribute band Jumping Jack Flash performing at the Belly Up on January 31, 2015. Photo's and video by David McCarter
I just realized, that I never tested two A-mode flashes (each flash has its own sensor). So, I just did this. My flashes don't have 1/2 or /1/3 stops in A-mode, so I used full stops (I could have cheated the ISO setting, though). The test shows, that TTL provides more accurate and more pleasant exposures IMO. Please note, that the A-mode shots show MORE FILL LIGHT, which is detectable if you look at the background. If I were to use A-mode, I'd probably decrease the fill light, instead of increasing the key light! One sensor in the camera is better than one in each flash (not a huge surprise :-) ) No editing was done (JPG's), except crop and resize.
I believe that the test furthermore shows, regarding the TTL samples, and compared to my previously posted image of the boy: Using a steep horizontal angle of the key light - towards a "rim light position" - calls for higher + compensation for the key light. This can be explained by the fact, that a key light in a steep position hits less of the background, thus reflecting less light back to the sensor. In the samples with the ball 0 or +5 looks good. The boy (almost rim light) needed a + 1.5 correction. SO the difference between key and fill should be somewhere between 0 and +1.5 (apr. 0% - 300%).
Hand painted, limited edition original work.
Available here: grafter.bigcartel.com/product/flash-silver-edition
this was weird. my finger accidentally covered most of the flash bulb, so only the tip of the pylons had the light hit them. Then in photoshop I did a simple automatic levels correction (nerd talk), and this is how it turned out. It desaturated everything but the flash area.
Reminds me of a mountain range at dawn, the way the sun strikes the peaks with light.
In the sun, with a huge flash. Kind of hard to see, and I missed the exact moment due to phone's lag, but she was photographing these fountains in lovely Bracknell with this huge flash mounted..
Cosina CX-1 zone-focus camera and matching CX-11a flash unit, Japan, 1980. The inspiration for the Russian LOMO LC-A of 1984. The only real difference is that the Soviets decided to toss the swivel-front lens cover of the CX-1/CX-2, thereby eliminating the one interesting feature of the camera while selling millions of them for 22 years until it was replaced by the Chinese-made LC-A+. Also I'm not sure LOMO ever made a flash unit of any kind, let alone one made for the LC-A. Can that be right?
The full story starts here: www.flickr.com/photos/94646225@N04/8703175118/
Two flashes (Yongnuo YN560 II and Yongnuo YN460 II) connected to the same trigger. The different delay of the two flashes causes ghost artifacts in the image (the object is illuminated two times at different time intervals)