View allAll Photos Tagged exploit
At that time in 2008 you saw these warnings everywhere. There were a few religious organizations there at the time, rabble-rousing for this cause, which was mostly in their dirty little minds. Most are gone now because of budget cuts.
8 November 2019, EuroPCom 2019 Exploiting the media mix
EuroPCom 2019 #europcom @EuroPCom2019
Belgium - Brussels - November 2019
© European Union / Eric Herchaft
Dennis ABBOTT, former Managing Director, Communications and Media Relations, BCW Global
Animals have the right to not be treated as property. Go Vegan!
From Animal Rights and Domesticated Nonhumans by Gary L Francione
(www.abolitionistapproach.com/animal-rights-and-domesticat...):
"One aspect of my theory of animal rights, as articulated in Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog? and other places, that troubles some animal advocates, is that if we accept the rights position, we ought not to bring any more domesticated nonhumans into existence. I apply this not only to animals we use for food, experiments, clothing, etc., but also to our nonhuman companions.
I can certainly understand that if you embrace the welfarist approach, which says that the use of nonhumans is morally acceptable as long as you treat them “humanely” and which sees the goal as better regulating animal use, you would reject my view. But if you, as I, see the primary problem of animal exploitation to be our use of nonhumans irrespective of whether we are “humane,” and regard the goal as the abolition of animal exploitation, then it is not clear to me why this position would cause you any difficulty.
The logic is simple. We treat animals as our property, as resources that we can use for our purposes. We bring billions of them into existence for the sole purpose of using and killing them. We have bred these animals to be dependent on us for their survival.
The central position of my rights theory is that we have no justification for treating animals as our property just as we had no justification for treating other humans as slaves. We have abolished human chattel slavery in most parts of the world; similarly, we should abolish animal slavery.
But what does that mean in the context of nonhumans? Should we “liberate” animals and let them wander freely in the streets? No, of course not. That would be as irresponsible as allowing small children to wander around. We should certainly care for those nonhumans whom we have already brought into existence but we should stop causing any more to come into existence. We have no justification for using nonhumans—however “humanely” we treat them.
There are two objections that I have heard in connection with this view.
First, there is the concern that we will lose “diversity” if we no longer have these domesticated nonhumans.
Even if continued domestication were necessary for biological diversity, that would not mean that it would be morally acceptable. We do not, however, have to address that issue. There is nothing “natural” about domesticated animals. They are creatures that we have created through selective breeding and confinement. To the extent that they have undomesticated relatives living in nature, we should certainly seek to protect those nonhumans first and foremost for their own sake and secondarily for the purposes of biological diversity. But our protection of presently existing domesticated nonhumans is not necessary for any sort of biological diversity.
Second, and more often, animal advocates express a difficulty with my view about domestication because they point to the fact that many of us live with nonhumans and treat them as members of our families. This arrangement, they argue, must certainly be morally acceptable.
As far as companion animals are concerned, some of us treat them as family members and some of us do not. But however we treat our dogs, cats, etc., they are property as far as the law is concerned. If you regard your dog as a member of your family and treat her well, the law will protect your decision just as the law will protect your decision to change the oil in your car every 1000 miles—the dog and the car are your property and if you wish to accord a higher value to your property, the law will protect your decision. But if you wish to accord your property a lower value and, for instance, have a guard dog who you keep chained in your yard and to whom you provide minimal food, water, and shelter—and no companionship or affection—the law will protect that decision as well.
The reality is that in the United States, most dogs and cats do not end up dying of old age in loving homes. Most have homes for a relatively short period of time before they are transferred to another owner, taken to a shelter, dumped, or taken to a veterinarian to be killed.
It does not matter whether we characterize an owner as a “guardian,” as some advocates urge. Such a characterization is meaningless. Those of us who live with companion animals are owners as far as the law is concerned and we have the legal right to treat our animals as we see fit with few limitations. Anticruelty laws do not even apply to the vast majority of instances in which humans inflict cruel treatment on nonhumans.
But, these advocates respond, we could, at least in theory, have a different and morally acceptable relationship with nonhumans. What if we abolished the property status of animals and required that we treat dogs and cats similar to the way we treat human children? What if humans who lived with dogs could no longer treat them instrumentally (e.g., as guard dogs, “show” dogs or cats, etc.) but had to treat them as family members? What if humans could not kill nonhuman companions except in instances in which at least some of us regard it as acceptable to allow assisted suicide in the human context (e.g., when the human is incurably ill and in great pain, etc.). Would it be acceptable to continue to breed nonhumans to be our companions then?
The answer is no.
Putting aside that the development of general standards of what would constitute treating nonhumans as “family members,” and the resolution of all the related issues, would be impossible as a practical matter, this position neglects to recognize that domestication itself raises serious moral issues irrespective of how the nonhumans involved are treated.
Domestic animals are dependent on us for when and whether they eat, whether they have water, where and when they relieve themselves, when they sleep, whether they get any exercise, etc. Unlike human children, who, except in unusual cases, will become independent and functioning members of human society, domestic animals are neither part of the nonhuman world nor fully part of our world. They remain forever in a netherworld of vulnerability, dependent on us for everything that is of relevance to them. We have bred them to be compliant and servile, or to have characteristics that are actually harmful to them but are pleasing to us. We may make them happy in one sense, but the relationship can never be “natural” or “normal.” They do not belong stuck in our world irrespective of how well we treat them.
This is more or less true of all domesticated nonhumans. They are perpetually dependent on us. We control their lives forever. They truly are “animal slaves.” We may be benevolent “masters,” but we really aren’t anything more than that. And that cannot be right.
My partner and I live with five rescued dogs. All five would be dead if we did not adopt them. We love them very much and try very hard to provide them the best of care and treatment. (And before anyone asks, all seven of us are vegans!) You would probably not find two people on the planet who enjoy living with dogs more than we do.
But if there were two dogs left in the universe and it were up to us as to whether they were allowed to breed so that we could continue to live with dogs, and even if we could guarantee that all dogs would have homes as loving as the one that we provide, we would not hesitate for a second to bring the whole institution of “pet” ownership to an end. We regard the dogs who live with us as refugees of sorts, and although we enjoy caring for them, it is clear that humans have no business continuing to bring these creatures into a world in which they simply do not fit.
There are some advocates who think that “animal rights” means that nonhumans have some sort of right to reproduce, so that it is wrong to sterilize nonhumans. If that view is correct, then we would be morally committed to allowing all domesticated species to continue to reproduce indefinitely. We cannot limit this “right of reproduction” to dogs and cats alone. Moreover, it makes no sense to say that we have acted immorally in domesticating nonhuman animals but we are now committed to allowing them to continue to breed. We made a moral mistake by domesticating nonhumans in the first place; what sense does it make to perpetuate it?
In sum, I can understand that welfarists, for whom treatment and not use is the primary moral issue, think that domestication and continued animal use is acceptable as long as we treat animals “humanely.” But I cannot understand why anyone who regards herself as an abolitionist thinks that the continued domestication of any nonhumans could be justified provided that we treat those animals well—any more than I can understand how anyone who regards herself as an abolitionist can be anything other than a vegan.
The subtitle of my book—Your Child or the Dog?—the notion of the child and the dog in the burning house (or on the lifeboat, or wherever) is meant to focus our attention on the fact that we seek to resolve moral conflicts between humans and animals. But we create those conflicts by, as it were, dragging the animal into the burning house by bringing her into existence as a resource for our use. We then wonder about how to resolve the conflict that we have created! That makes no sense.
If we took animals seriously, we would stop treating them as our resources, as our property. But that would mean an end to bringing nonhumans into existence so that we can use them for food, clothing, vivisection, or any other purpose, including for companionship.
Gary L. Francione"
Nadine Dorries, the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport visited the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children on 10 December, 2021.
Here's my contribution for the "Thought Processor" paper toy show opening on Thursday, 9/3/09 at Munky King store and gallery in LA curated by my buddy Phoneticontrol!
I thought it'd be fitting to revamp an old t-shirt design "Primate Exploitation" since the show is at Munky King ^_^
In case you were wondering, the Chinese characters 猴 means monkey and 吼 means to scream.
Along with this custom paper toy, I will also be showing the original painting- www.flickr.com/photos/martinhsu/2672998228/in/set-7215760...
All of the Thought Processor designs will be available for FREE download on my website www.martinhsu.com and www.phoneticontrol.com later so feel free to explore your inner Xacto knife and Krazy glue skills!
I'm super stoked on how it turned out and hope you dig, too! See you on opening night! ^_^v
ATLAS has been tracking the progress of this new Nirbot sample that uses MS DNS exploits to propagate.
The story of this site located in the mosan valley starts at the XIIIth and XIVth centuries, with the exploitation in quarry of the mosan stone (or "blue stone"), which was considered high quality. The blocks of limestone were cut in open-air but also in subterranean galleries that are now closed to the public.
The lime kilns in the pictures were built since 1872. During almost a century, this impressive construction attached to the mountain has seen many changes among which the successive addition of new kilns (finally eight, arranged on a 68 meter length) and the evolution of new technologies.
These lime kilns worked on a continuous process, fed 24 hours a day. Several layers of fuel (previously coal, then coke) and limestones were successively piled from the top of the kilns, then burned by a process of calcination. After cooling, the lime was extracted from the bottom. It was then used in mortars for construction.
Closed since 1971, these lime kilns are today abandoned and poorly secured (in spite of important risks of fall). A part of the cliff and the former quarry is still used by a climbing club.
------------------------
L'histoire de ce site situé dans la vallée mosane remonte aux XIIIe et XIVe siècles, lorsque la pierre mosane (ou "pierre bleue"), réputée d'une grande qualité, commence à être exploitée en carrière. Les blocs de pierre calcaire y étaient taillés à ciel ouvert mais aussi dans des galeries souterraines aujourd'hui fermées au public.
Les fours à chaux furent quant à eux construits à partir de 1872. Pendant près d'un siècle, cette imposante construction accolée à la montagne a connu de nombreux remaniements parmi lesquels l'ajout successif de nouveaux fours (finalement au nombre de huit, disposés sur une longueur de 68 mètres) et l'évolution de nouvelles technologies et procédés.
Ces fours fonctionnaient à feu continu, alimentés 24h sur 24. Des couches de combustibles (auparavant du charbon, puis du coke) et de pierres à chaux (calcaires) étaient empilées successivement depuis le haut des fours, puis brûlées par un procédé de calcination. La chaux ainsi produite après refroidissement était récupérée par le bas et acheminée, prête à l'usage dans les mortiers pour la construction.
Fermés depuis 1971, ces fours sont aujourd'hui à l'abandon dans un site étonnement peu sécurisé (malgré des risques de chute importants). Une partie de la falaise et des anciennes carrières est encore employée par un club d'escalade de la région.
Mardi 18 janvier 2011 : Le Président effectue un déplacement dans le Bas-Rhin pour présenter ses voeux au monde rural. Il visite à cette occasion une exploitation agricole à Mittelhausen avant de se rendre à la salle des fêtes de la commune pour y prononcer son discours de voeux
Upon our exploration exploits on Hurston.
We came across a Satellite crash!
Story:
Out for much-needed recreation, this squad of explorers headed to the woods near Lorville. But something evil and alien was in the air that evening. By the end of the night the men were at each other's throats!
Crew:
Azyael
Borgnet
CleverStar
Varkan
Who are we?
We are a gaming group made for gamers!
We plan to expand HSG into various games as time grows.
Members of HSG have at least 5+ years of online experience.
____________________________________________
Here's how to reach us!
Website:
Discord Server:
E-Mail:
Honestskilledgaming@gmail.com
__________________________________________
Social Medias!
www.twitch.tv/honestskilledgaming | Twitch.tv
www.facebook.com/honestskilledgamingg | Facebook
www.instagram.com/honestskilledgaming/ | Instagram
www.flickr.com/people/honestskilledgaming/ | Flickr
www.youtube.com/channel/UCYXm9HRYW0_GDepJDLVwRPQ | Youtube
________________________________________________
Interested in a good Org for Star Citizen or just to join a group?
Join HSG today!
Star Citizen referral code | 5000 in-game credits! - STAR-JHBH-F7ZV
robertsspaceindustries.com/orgs/HSG
www.honestskilledgaming.com/join-hsg-today.htm
...:..::..::: .Legal Info. :::..::..:.
If YOU find some of the uploads inappropriate, please give us a private message or email us at honestskilledgaming@gmail.com and we'll handle the issue as soon as possible, thanks!
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
SHARE Lab
Exploitation Forensics
Aksioma Project Space
Komenskega 18, Ljubljana
29 November - 15 December 2017
Production: Aksioma - Institute for Contemporary Art, Ljubljana, 2017
Photo: Jure Goršič / Aksioma
Cambodian's from two provinces campaigned to stop violence and child exploitation. Some of the banners read: "Fight against trafficking and abuse of children," and "Sex exploitation on children is a crime".
Mardi 18 janvier 2011 : Le Président effectue un déplacement dans le Bas-Rhin pour présenter ses voeux au monde rural. Il visite à cette occasion une exploitation agricole à Mittelhausen avant de se rendre à la salle des fêtes de la commune pour y prononcer son discours de voeux
The Exploited
HellFest - Clisson - 17.06.2011
Nicolas Gaire
Aucune photographie ne peut être reproduite, téléchargée, copiée, stockée, dérivée ou utilisée en partie ou en intégralité, sans permission écrite du propriétaire. Tous droits réservés.
No photograph may be reproduced, downloaded, copied, stored, manipulated, or used whole or in part of a derivative work, without my written permission. All rights reserved.
Nadine Dorries, the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport visited the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children on 10 December, 2021.
Exploitant : Cars Lacroix
Réseau : ValParisis
Ligne : 30-05
Lieu : Mont Olivet (Sartrouville, F-78)
Lien TC Infos : tc-infos.fr/vehicule/25511
The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) honors its 2022 “Heroes” who have gone above and beyond to help protect the nation’s most valuable resource – children. The event was hosted at the Arlington, VA headquarters of Lockheed Martin. Reginald Saunders /NCMEC
[NEW]Pokémon Unite 900K Aeos Gems Exploit
The latest Pokemon Unite update is now live which allows you to play in mobile devices. The game has launched early in the Nintendo Switch, but now its on android and iOS platforms. If you just started playing this game and enjoyed it and stumbled on this video then you are in luck! Cause in this video tutorial you will be guided through on how to get 900k worth of Aeos Gems. This is currently working in both android and iOS, so be sure to follow the step by step guide shown in this video tutorial. Once you have followed everything just login back into your in-game account in Pokemon Unite, the aeos gems will be added directly into your inventory.
Official Site: appmonarch.com/pokemonunite
“End the Slavery”: Sakuma Brothers Farms Workers of Familias Unidas por la Justicia March for a Labor Contract and Against Exploitation and Abuse: Burlington, Washington, Saturday, July 11, 2015.
Exploitant : Transdev TVO
Réseau : R'Bus (Argenteuil)
Ligne : 1
Lieu : Gare du Val d'Argenteuil (Argenteuil, F-95)
Lien TC Infos : tc-infos.fr/vehicule/35145
Un site d'exploitation artisanale de l'or (Dioura en langue locale) à Khrarakhéna / Kédougou, appelé "Dioura". Les femmes de Kharakhéna s'activent dans l'extraction de l'or avec du matériel artisanal (pioches, calebasses, haches)
Exploitant : Transdev Les Cars Rose
Réseau : ValParisis
Ligne : 38-01
Lieu : Gare d'Ermont – Eaubonne (Ermont, F-95)
Lien TC Infos : tc-infos.fr/id/17946
We met Wattie and friends in Orel. It was spring 2009. After that we drink and smoke together for many times. Glad to present you some footage from the concert in local russian city.
Also you can watch an interview with frontmen of The Exploited Wattie Buchan!
All of staff here - live-blog.tv
ALEXANDRIA, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children: Volunteers from the US Marshalls and NCMEC staff package HOPE bags of essentials for survivors upon recovery. ( NCMEC 2023 Claire Edkins)
“End the Slavery”: Sakuma Brothers Farms Workers of Familias Unidas por la Justicia March for a Labor Contract and Against Exploitation and Abuse: Burlington, Washington, Saturday, July 11, 2015.
The Exploited
HellFest - Clisson - 17.06.2011
Nicolas Gaire
Aucune photographie ne peut être reproduite, téléchargée, copiée, stockée, dérivée ou utilisée en partie ou en intégralité, sans permission écrite du propriétaire. Tous droits réservés.
No photograph may be reproduced, downloaded, copied, stored, manipulated, or used whole or in part of a derivative work, without my written permission. All rights reserved.
ALEXANDRIA, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children: Volunteers from the US Marshalls and NCMEC staff package HOPE bags of essentials for survivors upon recovery. ( NCMEC 2023 Claire Edkins)
5211
I met this lad in a migrant workers' school in Northern Thailand. His parents have fled the military dictatorship in Burma which attacks and kills villagers on the border.
His prospects are not good. He is likely to end up working a hard life as an agricultural labourer, like his parents.
His schoolteacher put it best, as he gestured to the lad and his classmates, and the land around, "This is slavery ..... this is slavery".
His parents are condemned to work for minimal and unreliable wages in the fields surrounding the school. Most are on less than £1.50 a day and the recent drought means that their income this year will be even less. This is the real meaning of global warming and poverty. They don't have the luxury of attending learned seminars to discuss whether climate change really is occurring or not.
A march against the exploitation of and racism toward international students in Australia that the governments (both state and federal) continue to allow to exist. International and Australian students from NSW universities (such as Newcastle, UTS, Macquarie, UNSW and Sydney University) rallied together, marching from Sydney University to UTS and on to NSW Parliament House, asking for the government to intervene and change legislation that allows international students to be taken advantage of.
Some basic rights like abolishing the 20-hour work week limit and providing student travel concessions to international students were demanded in chants and songs. At a deeper level though, the protesters are demanding an end to the systematic racism and exploitation of international students, who are increasingly treated more as a means to profit than as students to educate.