View allAll Photos Tagged Test
Test rig for a raising/lowering 'boarding ramp' for a large vehicle. This is in its current fully lowered position. To see it is action go to www.flickr.com/photos/karenleahquinn/5221062074/in/photos...
Ok so first off I know this isn't a fair comparison but just in-case anyone cares this is the difference between a cheap consumer lens (on the right) and a pro grade lens (on the left)
Both pictures were taken at F5 1/60s iso 200 with a SB600 on camera bounced off ceiling set to 1/4
Between lens changing I had a piece of string on the ground to mark where he was standing and where I was shooting from.
So the test is pretty much as accurate as I could make it. Both pictures were shot Jpeg (which I NEVER shoot jpeg but wanted fair results) sooc
So the Image on the left is the:
Nikkor AF-S 24-70mm F2.8G FX
The image on the right is:
Nikkor AF-S 55-200mm VR F4-5.6G DX
The amount of detail in the eyelashes should be enough to demonstrate the difference. But for some reason the DX lens is under exposed.
All that said I know which lens I will always reach for!!!
Tested these brands and some more. Will need some time to round up the results...
Too many things too do, too little time.
Lees alvast: www.foodlog.nl/artikel/vissaus-de-grote-smaaktest/
Of toch gewoon over vissaus: www.aziatische-ingredienten.nl/vissaus/
I just wanted to see what the capabilities of the different cameras we have here at home are like.
First is the camcorder from 2004, a Canon ZR85, in the middle is the Canon Powershot A620 from 2005, and last is the 2008 Samsung NV24HD.
I was a little surprised just how bad the Samsung did in this test, and how well the Camcorder did. I really can't get over the amount of detail it pulled out at high zoom. I think the optics, certainly more designed for zoom than wide angles, must have more to do with it than the digital sensor, which just doesn't give very good quality images or videos, otherwise.
The camcorder has taken maybe 30 hours of video in its lifetime, and maybe 100 still photos, the A620 has taken well over 200,000 photos, mostly failed nighttime timelapses with chdk, and the Samsung hasn't taken more than a thousand shots, but if you want a truly pocket-sized camera that can take an interior shot, or a high definition video, without having to ask everybody to keep backing up, and standing closer together, the 24mm-wide (equivalent) lens on the Samsung is the only way to go, and its video quality is actually superior than the camcorder, at least it seems like it on a TV screen.
Too bad she-who-used-to-be-obeyed will be taking it with her when she goes.
Test
Ph: Anibal Vecchio
Model: Mili
Production: Stefania Gonzalez Cona
© 2012 Anibal Vecchio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncomercial - No Derivs 3.0 Unported License
About:
Anibal Vecchio, Fashion Filmaker and Photographer from Buenos Aires.
My work:
www.facebook.com/anibalvecchio.arte
My videos:
A Bristol Siddeley-Maybach MD655 engine, from a BR Western Region Class 52 diesel-hydraulic locomotive, under stationary test at Swindon Works. Taken on an open day, Saturday 13th September 1975. The engineer in charge ...a white-coated, bespectacled, middle-aged man... sat behind the window of a control room at the top of a flight of steps. From time to time he would notch up a handle on his console to increase the engine revs, which were displayed as flickering red numerals on a screen. In the confined space this produced a most satisfying din.
Le test complet de cet objectif est à lire sur www.nikonpassion.com/test-tamron-17-35-zoom-expert-pro
This is a composite iPhone photo and editing test.
The TOP image is the original iPhone image, and it is typically noisy (view full size to see noise level).
The MIDDLE was edited (levels, color balance) on the iPhone using Photogene iPhone app and still presents the same amount of noise.
The THIRD photo took the previous, Photogene altered image and, using Photoshop, ran a Reduce Noise filter with heavy settings, then doubled the image, blurred the top layer and set it to 'overlay mode' at 66% opacity. This is a pretty common method for making better, softer, smoky images. A much more rich, deep result.
iPhone image editing apps should consider adding noise reduction and automating some of the more common image enhancement tricks beyond just levels, even if they disguise it and call it something else.
See full rez : flickr.com/photos/therefore/3172156062/sizes/o/
Finally, one of the best ways to improve photos on the iPhone is to use an app that looks at the accelerometer to determine when you are moving the least. Try Steadycam. I use it instead of the built-in photo app.
Tilt test model showing a large scale RT model on the tilting platform. Model is in the LT museum Covent Garden.
Test nouveau smartphone en faible luminosité. Les ombres et lumières sont bien définies, les ISO vraiment bien gérés par l'électronique. Je suis vraiment surpris par la qualité.
A tester en journée ☺️
Le test complet du Nikon Z fc, hybride APS-C Nikon Vintage .
Lire le test :
www.nikonpassion.com/test-nikon-z-fc-nikkor-z-28-mm-f-28-...
Pilatus brought the prototype of their PC-24 bizjet to Cranfield this week for water ingestion trials. There's an area of the runway that they flood with water and then drive through it at high speed, making a very big splash!
Sadly, I didn't have time to get in a better position for pictures so had to put up with this long range shot as she turned off the runway after one such run.
Test av oppblåsbar vest med Anne Kristiansen og Webjørn Knudsen Knutsen.
Her vises skrittstropp på en Baltic-vest.
Agfa Record III with Kodak Portra 800 negative film.
From the first test roll through my replacement Agfa Record III. The first one had a misalignment of the front standard which made infinity focus impossible as well as varying from left to right. First signs seem very positive.
Sorry for the uninteresting subject matter. My main priority was to shoot some frames and see if this camera could focus.
I recently became aware of major differences in viewing on Flickr. I have an iMac and use Safari as my browser. When I view it using Firefox the contrast is lost, as is the resolution and a changed color balance (reduced reds). I have no idea what it looks like on a PC. I've submitted this one which is way "cranked" regarding contrast, saturation (especially the reds), and sharpening (high pass filter plus USM).
I'm submitting this so I can again check out how it appears on the web using a "universal" browser. However, I still won't know what it looks like on a PC. So..................
If you like it, enough to comment, please note the computer and browser you used to view it, and how much "pop" it has. Is there any cyan in the sky? Is the bark too red? Is shadow detail preserved? (Also, if you do have a Mac, please add any tips, settings etc., you use in preparing material for the web.)
This is a test shot.
I've never used this new computer before, not shot a photo to edit up in a few years (I'm getting back to this camera thing), Canon's DDP and Photomatix have really improved since I used them about 10 years back.
I'm working on getting me sea leg again,so to speak.
Used by the drug testing group, a state wide group that only do drug and alcohol testing. Taken in 2006
Details of a Spaceship Earth that is located within the Test Track attraction.
EPCOT Center | Future World | Test Track
Thanks for looking! I appreciate feedback.
How to check Internet speed from the command line on Linux
If you would like to use this photo, be sure to place a proper attribution linking to xmodulo.com
NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE, ENGLAND - JULY 04: Newcastle Staff (L-R) Craig Musham, Jamie Hartley, Jack Ade and Simon Tweddle during a Newcastle United First Team Fitness Testing at the Newcastle United Training Centre on July 04, 2014, in Newcastle upon Tyne, England. (Photo by Serena Taylor/Newcastle United via Getty Images)