View allAll Photos Tagged Comparison
Photos for Digital Photo Class (which get uploaded to flickr).
Photo Credit:Top: William Eggleston Bottom: Robert Frank
This is a size comparison with my new Bandai Hello Kitty. She is smack dab in-between the baby and child size Sylvanian Families.
Four of the visitors to the garden over just a few minutes one evening. If my identification skills are to be trusted, from left to right, we have a Honeybee, a Buff-Tailed Bumblebee, an Early Bumblebee and a Common Carder bee.
big comparison left to right: Germanium Fuzz Clone, DOD 250 Clone, MXR Distortion+, Ibanez TS808 from the 70s, TS 9 from the 80s. The winner is of course the TS808, but the DOD clone is nearly as good.
All taken on a full spectrum D70 at f16 but with various shutter speeds.
If I learned anything from this experiment it's that my gear needs a jolly good cleaning!
So here there is Euclase and Chalco.
I had no space for him on the table in the previous photo XD
Euclase is taller, of course ;)
2 shots to compare my Fuji HS10 with the Fuji HS50 EXR which I bought this spring.
I've used it long enough now to know it's not operator error. The IS and the AF are simply not as good. I have not gotten one shot with the same clarity as the HS 10.
Buying a camera is a crap shoot.
Sorry for Arnorr's messy wig, I need to get him a replacement.
Eloquence is a Feeple60 Chloe bishop full set.
Arnorr is a Doll-Zone Ian.
Pastel pink head(to left) and Peach normal head (to the right) on my yellowed pink body from Fairyland :)
Size comparison of Kemp's Ridley sea turtle, LA-15 to Dr. Bob MacLean's hand. Photo credit Meghan Calhoun
Comparison of a gameworn 1984 Falcons helmet and the 1994 ProLine throwback. The plastic shell has a slight pinkish hue and does not match the deeper scarlet of the vintage red Falcons helmets. There are slight differences in the die cut around the bird and an even slighter difference in the shape of the bird's eye, but they are nearly identical.
Despite the 'acknowledged' web wisdom that you can use a 1.4x extender OK, but not a 2x extender on a telephoto lens (without chromatic aberration and loss of contrast) I decided to do a field test. I took my Canon 300mm L IS back to Sculthorpe Moor and under the same weather conditions (bright sunlight) same time of day, same perch but different reed bunting (I think!) took some shots with the 2x extender. The 2x is actually a Sigma - which I use with my Sigma 150mm 2.8 Macro - so breaking another convention using a non matched lens.
The reason for this - trying to convince myself that this combination equivalent to 600mm (or 960mm if you allow for crop factor) works - and I therefore don't have to spend any more sleepless nights working out how to afford a 500mm F4.
Anyway, please let me know which of the photos below is best/sharpest? I have my opinion - but it may be wishful thinking!
The 1.4x shots are cropped more so the size comparison is the same.
Many thanks!
Same hummingbird, but dramatic difference in the presentation of the red gorget. If you ignore the minor exposure differences, there might be more than 5 stops between the dark and bright presentation.
Friend asked for a comparison of the the 3 fairyland bodies I own.
From left to right:
Minife Rheia on the m-line boy body (WS)
Minifee Celine on the F-line body with the male chest (NS)
Personally I find the m-line body to be the best poser and the most stable. However, I really enjoy the aesthetic of the f-line body.
Original on the left, finished product on the right. I took three shots of this knothole, the first two much closer than this one so I wouldn't have to crop. But this one came out better.
The first two, I concentrated on setting the focus first on the near surface, and secondly on the far surface. I didn't care for the far surface focus effect, and the center light was all gone. I got a bit more even exposure in this version, then cropped it to the original scene I had in mind.
So i wanted to do a comparison of the expo disc for anyone who is on the fence of buying one.
Here is a side by side shot of my kitchen. These are straight out of the camera.
On the left is my D700 on Auto White Balance and on the left is after using the Expo Disc in the Custom White Balance.
HUGE difference i must say! Well worth it.
Just a note, i had my custom WB setting as "D-1" at first instead of the "D-0" and it was producing terrible results. If you do get one make sure you realize whats going on with your custom WB first.
left to right : littlefee ante (normal skin), leekeworld honey (1st body; white skin), rosenlied beige (normal skin)
Comparison of stickers from set 6692 (sticker sheet) with the stickers of set 1525. Also of note are the stickers from set 4030 which are similar, but can be recognized due to a white border around the LEGO logo.
shot lenths comparison between 2 films by Dziga Vertov:
The 11th Year (orange graph) and
Man with a Movie Camera (brown graph)