View allAll Photos Tagged Comparison

Which one do you prefer?

I did a screen shot to show my mom the comparison of a dslr and a point and shoot.. Lol I think you can tell which one wins lol..

 

The left was shot with my DSLR Canon Rebel T3

 

The right was shot with my -Non DSLR Canon Powershot SX30 point and shoot, Same range an everything, Both on a overcast day! Wow I am proud to say I own a Dslr I didnt know what I was missing!

Lavoro di postporduzione per il gruppo PPC Post-Processing Comparison:

http://www.flickr.com/groups/400962@N21/discuss/72157600390645145/

 

Ho lavorato con Photoshop:

1) modificata esposizione, offset e gamma

2) applicato effetto variazione colore (viraggio su giallo e rosso)

3) inseriti di due livelli (automobile e sua ombra)

4) duplicata l'immagine ottenuta e desaturata per poi virarla rossa

5) modificato l'alfa dei livelli per mescolarli l'uno con l'altro.

Mouse pad comparisons. From top left down = PureTrak Talent, Razer Mantis Speed, Artisan HIEN Kai.g3 soft, CMStorm Battlepad CS-X. From top right down = Razer Megasoma, Razer Goliathus Speed, Artisan HIEN Kai.g3 hard, Handstands SuperMat

Comparison of the skull of a spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) with a gray wolf (Canis lupus), a coyote (Canis latrans), and a domestic dog of mixed breed (Canis familiaris).

 

Clockwise from upper right: hyena, dog, coyote, wolf.

 

Spend some time observing the differences between each skull.

 

Most apparent in this picture is the difference in width of the jaws, and the differences in the size of the sagittal crest at the back of the skull. The coyote's crest is the smallest, indicating that it has the weakest jaw strength.

 

Some dog breeds lack this crest almost entirely. This specimen has a fairly well-developed crest for a medium-sized dog.

Totally didn't realize that I didn't upload my box opening + comparisons onto Flickr.

 

Back.

 

More detailed post here:

 

www.denofangels.com/forums/showthread.php?448725-Narin-N4...

Poses borrowed from:

denaliwind.livejournal.com/187146.html

  

Pukifee

Kid Delf Version 2

Kid Delf Version 1

Mystic Kids MSD

 

KDF.v1 and MK have been hot glue sueded.

General Motors 1980s development of FWD replacements for the Chevrolet Camaro, Pontiac Firebird and a new Oldsmobile Silhouette Sport Coupe.

Comparison of the center versus corner performance of the Leica Vario-Elmar-R 21-35 f/3.5-4 with a Metabones Speed Booster on a Sony NEX-3. Both images at 15mm f/2.9 (the lens was set to 21mm f/3.5). Left image is crop of extreme corner; right image is crop of center. Both images were focused using the 14x live view focus aid. The corner crop was taken at a focus distance of approximately 8 feet, while the center crop was taken at just to the side of the infinity setting. Actual distance between sensor and chimney: approximately 90 feet (calculated using gmap-pedometer.com).

 

My conclusion:

 

The Vario-Elmar 21-35, combined with the Speed Booster, has substantial field curvature. (I believe this is due to the zoom lens' nature, not the adapter.) When this is accounted for, however, light editing can reveal meaningful details in even the extreme corners. Pulling back from optimum center focus will result in increased corner focus performance, assuming the same subject distance. Adjusting focus distance can then be considered akin to using small apertures: if one is willing to sacrifice peak performance, meaningful gains can be found elsewhere at the photographer's discretion.

 

Notes:

 

Center crop is enlarged 3:1; corner crop is enlarged 2:1. This is to compensate for perspective distortion, giving the subject approximately the same visual size.

 

Light edits were made in Lightroom. The corner crop has enhanced contrast and clarity. Both crops have edits for chromatic aberrations. I only spent a few minutes trying to equalize the two; as they're both in excess of 100% crops, feel welcome to download the original image and make your own edits.

Mavala Lagoon (2 coats)

Alessandro 77-162 (2 coats)

China glaze For Audrey (1 coat)

OPI Mermaid's tears (2 coats)

for comparison only

 

I could not confirm who owns this picture but if the owner does not want it posted her just let me know. It is here for research only.

CONTAX Vario-Sonnar 4/80-200 T* / 200mm, F4

Grinding Ceramic ginger, vegetables

Saw on bottom, Stoner on top. Special thanks to Will for making this mod possible

Video Standards

 

XGA: 1024x768 - Yellow (Planar 15" PL1500)

SXGA: 1280x1024 - Blue (Acer 19" AL1912)

UXGA: 1600x1200 - Green(ViewSonic 20.1" VP2030b)

WSXGA+: 1680x1050 - Red (Acer 22" AL2223W)

WUXGA: 1920x1200 - Light Blue (Samsung 24" LTM240CT01)

WQXGA: 2560x1600 - Grey (Dell 30" 3007WFP)

 

Thank you Prismo

 

Wikipedia's page named, "Computer display standard" explains it well too.

Comparison between awarded Phragmipedium longifolium 'Penns Creek' HCC/AOS and a standard Phrag. longifolium.

Exhibited at 2008-04 NCJC

Exhibited by: Woodstream Orchids

Comparing two similar bike geometries in Photoshop with 50% transparency.

Taking photographic variables into account, they show much resemblance.

These two photos show the difference between the quality of image using the extra optical zoom at 62.4x and digital zoom at roughly the same magnification using a Panasonic FZ150. Despite the handbook claiming that the extra optical zoom doesn't lose image quality, it suffers in comparison to the digital zoom, which is supposed to lose image quality. The first 3 digits on the number plates have been blurred by me.

Did some testshots yesterday and comparing the details of both jpg's out of the camera as well raw version.

 

ISO 160, STD, 28mm (14-42 kit lens), f/10, 1/500s

 

Here the jpg file straight from the camera. Full Size 4592x3488

 

I am very positively surprised about the quality with this sensor size and 'budget' lens.

(Coming from FF EOS with L lens is hard to be fair)

 

Full size: www.flickr.com/photos/panoramaxl/6717537559/sizes/o/in/ph...

 

RAW after editing: www.flickr.com/photos/panoramaxl/6717494323/in/photostream

My sister missed out on the Basic Haru release, and now she's glad that she did. She loves the clothes he's wearing! She already decided on getting him in NS but here is a comparison for those who would want to know.

Hope this gives you a rough idea :D

 

Image from Latidoll.com

From left to right:

 

Magic Mirror Levon body with Iplehouse Owen head

Soul Doll Juno on new kids double body

SummerBirdBJD Viola

Magic Mirror Moira

Soul Doll Junia on kids NL body

I always like a size comparison photo! :D

It gives my viewers a good sense of the different sizes, IMO.

 

Comparison of the crania of a child and fetus

1928-29 Ford Model A by Minichamps and 1932-37 GAZ Model A by IXO (I think).

They are both "Made In Italy"Dedo dolls made in the late 1940s by Maura Doll.

The left girl has a slightly smaller head and the skin tone is yellowish,as she should represent a little chinese karate girl!^_^

Fairyland Minifee body from 2013.

Iplehouse skin comparison from the top Spesial real, Glow Peach gold(more yellow), at left Peach gold(more orange) and Normal

For any form of publication, please include the link to this page:

www.grida.no/resources/6971

 

This photo has been graciously provided to be used in the GRID-Arendal resources library by: GRID-Arendal

Size comparison between Lati White, Pukipuki, Pukifee and Lati Yellow.

 

Latidoll Lati White Belle, Fairyland Pukipuki Flora wink, Fairyland Pukifee Mio & Latidoll Lati Yellow Happy Bath Lumi

 

ew, great comparison though... but ew

Stan is 5'9" and Mom...isn't. Stan is 13, mom..isn't..

Here are comparison photos of all 3 wolf sisters, next to Nefera.

Clawdia and Nefera are the same size.

1 2 ••• 40 41 43 45 46 ••• 79 80