View allAll Photos Tagged PullProcessing,
© István Pénzes
Please NOTE and RESPECT the copyright.
17 June 2012
Leicaflex SL2
Summilux 80mm
Agfa APX100 @ 50 ASA
Rodinal 1:50
Coolscan 5000
Gorgeous afternoon yesterday meant a good opportunity to burn a second roll in my F3HP, I had one roll of Tmax 100 left and I decided to try rating it at ISO 50 and also go with a super diluted rodinal stand development with minimal agitation. I am really impressed with the results and I've only scanned 10 shots so far!
All of them are with the F3HP and 105/2.5. The chemistry setup was;
Rodinal 1:100
3 agitations initially (not quite inversion becuase I had a double tank that was only filled up to cover the one roll*)
3 agitations at 30 min
Timer was set for 59 min but I missed the cut off, probably went 1 hr 10 min or so
*I only filled it up to cover the one roll becuase I was thinking that the idea of stand developing is for the developer to slowly exhaust itself and I worried that having twice the needed developer, even with limited agitation might lead to extra development that I didn't want. Not sure this is true maybe someone can educate me.
**Second 'innovation' to me I forget where I read this, I think it was on photo.net's b/w darkroom forum but I managed to not squeege this roll preferring to do a normal distilled water with photoflo final water bath then I hung the roll slightly diagonally in my shower to dry. Some combo of getting a low enough photoflo dilution and the diagonal resulted in extra clean images compared to what I'm used too.
KODAK 400TX pulled to 200
Self Develop: 5mins in Tmax Developer 1:4, 20 deg.
Leica M2.
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 2/50
Straight negatve scan
Taken with my Rolleiflex automat k4/50 on tmax 400 film accidentely exposed at 100 iso, and developed in HC110 Dil H for 8.30 mins @ 20°.
Spotmatic II | Industar 50-2 | Arista Premium 400 (@ 200)
__
The decision was made late in developing to place this roll of 400tx-like emulsion directly out of the fixer under the running water in the sink: a 3°C temperature gain. It produced the predictable astigmatized micro-reticulated results in the film: soft edges and clumpy grain. Roll #93, Plus-X, although being developed simultaneously in the same tank and subject to all the same processes, came out the better for wear as I've come to expect of that particular emulsion.
One might think it could be attributable to this roll being pulled to 200 or a 1:25 dilution being used rather than 1:50, but experience points to temperature variation during processing, during the wash cycle in particular. And, again I must marvel, the phenomenon seems to only occur when the wash medium is warmer than the chemicals; Colder wash water seems to actually improve results!
And then, we have our demonic wild card factor: the ambient temperature of the room in which the film dries!
Roll #94, Frame 33. 1/250; f/16 [ev 15]
Dev: Rodinal 1:25 (500ml); 4:30 @ 20°C. 2 inversions & 1 roll / min.
© István Pénzes
Please NOTE and RESPECT the copyright.
16th March 2012
Leicaflex SL2
Summilux 80mm
Agfa APX100 @ 50 ASA
Rodinal 1:50
Coolscan 5000
Canon P, Voigtlander 35mm f/2.5 Color-Skopar, Ilford HP5+ @ 100 (oops), HC-110 dil h, 7:45 @ 66º. 22-092
Shot on the South Bank, just before it started raining. Sensia 400 shot at 200, pull-processed by 1 stop to compensate.
KODAK 400TX pulled to 200
Self Develop: 5mins in Tmax Developer 1:4, 20 deg.
Leica M2.
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 2/50
Straight negatve scan
The beautiful little side garden at St. Peter's in Capitol Hill caught just a touch of afternoon light a couple weeks ago as I was walking by. I liked how it gave a nice rim of light on the statue of the Virgin's shoulder and also lit up the grasses in front, I wish I'd separated the two a bit more in my framing to show the juxtopositioning fo the two features illuminated but I think its still kind of cool. This is a shot that was really made decent through stand development in my opinion, so much is in shadow that the long development pulled plenty of detail and created nice tonality. In LR I did mess with the curves to make the statue a bit more middle grey to bring out detail.
Nikon F3HP
NIkon 105/2.5 AI'd
Kodak Tmax 100, rated at 50
Rodinal 1:100
3 agitations initially (not quite inversion becuase I had a double tank that was only filled up to cover the one roll*)
3 agitations at 30 min
Timer was set for 59 min but I missed the cut off, probably went 1 hr 10 min or so
ILFORD DELTA 3200 pulled to 800
Self develop: 6 mins 30s in Tmax Developer 1:4, 20 deg
Leica M2
Leica SUMMICRON-M 1:2/35mm
B+W medium yellow 022 filter (2X)
Straight negative scan
ILFORD DELTA 3200 pulled to 1600
Self develop: 8 mins in Ilford DD-X 1:4, 20 deg
Leica M2
Leica SUMMICRON Rigid 1:2/50mm
B+W medium yellow 022 filter (2X)
Straight negative scan
© István Pénzes
Please NOTE and RESPECT the copyright.
17 June 2012
Leicaflex SL2
Summilux 80mm
Agfa APX100 @ 50 ASA
Rodinal 1:50
Coolscan 5000
Mamiya C220TLR + Mamiya Sekor 80mm/f2.8 + Fujifilm NPZ800 (pull to 400), diy C-41 rotary development in Jobo CPE2 for 3.15 min at 38C
November2024. Happy Newly. My backyard in LittleRock, Arkansas USA. Kentmere400pulled200.PentaxZ1p.SMCPentax100mmAF.IlfotecDDX-1:4@8minutes.CameraScan:FujifilmXH1
© István Pénzes.
Please NOTE and RESPECT the copyright.
11th., November 2010, Meilenwerk, Düsseldorf, Test shots with the T-max 3200 @ 1600.
Nikon F6
Nikon Nikkor AIS 35mm 1,4
Kodak T-Max P3200 @ 1600
T-max developer 19 degrees Celsius 11 Minutes
Coolscan 5000
Portra Test: Slight overexposure to +1 and underdevelopment by 30 secs. using Unicolor press kit. Mixed Results.
ILFORD DELTA 3200 pulled to 1600
Self develop: 8 mins in Ilford DD-X 1:4, 20 deg
Leica M2
Leica SUMMICRON Rigid 1:2/50mm
B+W medium yellow 022 filter (2X)
Straight negative scan
Gorgeous afternoon yesterday meant a good opportunity to burn a second roll in my F3HP, I had one roll of Tmax 100 left and I decided to try rating it at ISO 50 and also go with a super diluted rodinal stand development with minimal agitation. I am really impressed with the results and I've only scanned 10 shots so far!
All of them are with the F3HP and 105/2.5. The chemistry setup was;
Rodinal 1:100
3 agitations initially (not quite inversion becuase I had a double tank that was only filled up to cover the one roll*)
3 agitations at 30 min
Timer was set for 59 min but I missed the cut off, probably went 1 hr 10 min or so
*I only filled it up to cover the one roll becuase I was thinking that the idea of stand developing is for the developer to slowly exhaust itself and I worried that having twice the needed developer, even with limited agitation might lead to extra development that I didn't want. Not sure this is true maybe someone can educate me.
**Second 'innovation' to me I forget where I read this, I think it was on photo.net's b/w darkroom forum but I managed to not squeege this roll preferring to do a normal distilled water with photoflo final water bath then I hung the roll slightly diagonally in my shower to dry. Some combo of getting a low enough photoflo dilution and the diagonal resulted in extra clean images compared to what I'm used too.
Pentax ME super, smc Pentax-M 50mm 1.7, medium yellow filter, Ilford Delta 3200 @ 1600, HC-110 B, Epson V500
ILFORD DELTA 3200 pulled to 1600
Self develop: 8 mins in Ilford DD-X 1:4, 20 deg
Leica M2
Leica SUMMICRON Rigid 1:2/50mm
B+W medium yellow 022 filter (2X)
Straight negative scan
Agfa APX 100 shot at 50 developed in Xtol 1:1 for 8min, Contax G2, Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 90mm, Orange filter
Spotmatic II | Super Takumar 135mm | Fomapan 100
The residuum of twilight. Stough Canyon Nature center and fire road, seen from K peak.
Roll #111, Frame 19. 1m; f/8 [ev 1]
Dev: D-76 (1:1) (225ml), 8 min @ 20°C (EI 50). 5 sec rolling agit / min.
Welcome to the world Amelia. I was on hand as my buddy and lovely wife brought home their second. Congratulations to D & T on their beautiful daughter. I felt very privileged to be there (plus, no one was going to babysit big sister Lily).
Nikon F3HP
NIkon 105/2.5 AI'd
Kodak Tmax 100, rated at 50
Rodinal 1:100
3 agitations initially (not quite inversion becuase I had a double tank that was only filled up to cover the one roll*)
3 agitations at 30 min
Timer was set for 59 min but I missed the cut off, probably went 1 hr 10 min or so
this was taken from the pool looking up at emma through the water using my antique underwater camera.
unfortunatly, because it is an antique, it doesn't like the water anymore and it's now in the camera hospital.
ilford delta 100 in my nikonos II.
© István Pénzes.
Please NOTE and RESPECT the copyright.
11th., November 2010, Meilenwerk, Düsseldorf, Test shots with the T-max 3200 @ 1600.
Nikon F6
Nikon Nikkor AIS 35mm 1,4
Kodak T-Max P3200 @ 1600
T-max developer 19 degrees Celsius 11 Minutes
Coolscan 5000
© István Pénzes
Please NOTE and RESPECT the copyright.
16th March 2012
Leicaflex SL2
Summilux 80mm
Agfa APX100 @ 50 ASA
Rodinal 1:50
Coolscan 5000
Taken by my wife.
Pity she likes to see instantaneous results when it comes to taking photos, I have a feeling she has an affinity for manual focusing and classic cameras if only she'd give it more of a try.
LegacyPro400 @EI200, 5' in R09 1:49, 28C.
Gorgeous afternoon yesterday meant a good opportunity to burn a second roll in my F3HP, I had one roll of Tmax 100 left and I decided to try rating it at ISO 50 (Though this shot was still at 100, first two shots of the roll were) and also go with a super diluted rodinal stand development with minimal agitation. I am really impressed with the results and I've only scanned 10 shots so far!
All of them are with the F3HP and 105/2.5. The chemistry setup was;
Rodinal 1:100
3 agitations initially (not quite inversion becuase I had a double tank that was only filled up to cover the one roll*)
3 agitations at 30 min
Timer was set for 59 min but I missed the cut off, probably went 1 hr 10 min or so
*I only filled it up to cover the one roll becuase I was thinking that the idea of stand developing is for the developer to slowly exhaust itself and I worried that having twice the needed developer, even with limited agitation might lead to extra development that I didn't want. Not sure this is true maybe someone can educate me.
**Second 'innovation' to me I forget where I read this, I think it was on photo.net's b/w darkroom forum but I managed to not squeege this roll preferring to do a normal distilled water with photoflo final water bath then I hung the roll slightly diagonally in my shower to dry. Some combo of getting a low enough photoflo dilution and the diagonal resulted in extra clean images compared to what I'm used too.
© István Pénzes
Please NOTE and RESPECT the copyright.
17 June 2012
Leicaflex SL2
Summilux 80mm
Agfa APX100 @ 50 ASA
Rodinal 1:50
Coolscan 5000
Gorgeous afternoon yesterday meant a good opportunity to burn a second roll in my F3HP, I had one roll of Tmax 100 left and I decided to try rating it at ISO 50 and also go with a super diluted rodinal stand development with minimal agitation. I am really impressed with the results and I've only scanned 10 shots so far!
All of them are with the F3HP and 105/2.5. The chemistry setup was;
Rodinal 1:100
3 agitations initially (not quite inversion becuase I had a double tank that was only filled up to cover the one roll*)
3 agitations at 30 min
Timer was set for 59 min but I missed the cut off, probably went 1 hr 10 min or so
*I only filled it up to cover the one roll becuase I was thinking that the idea of stand developing is for the developer to slowly exhaust itself and I worried that having twice the needed developer, even with limited agitation might lead to extra development that I didn't want. Not sure this is true maybe someone can educate me.
**Second 'innovation' to me I forget where I read this, I think it was on photo.net's b/w darkroom forum but I managed to not squeege this roll preferring to do a normal distilled water with photoflo final water bath then I hung the roll slightly diagonally in my shower to dry. Some combo of getting a low enough photoflo dilution and the diagonal resulted in extra clean images compared to what I'm used too.