View allAll Photos Tagged Cross_Processing,
Fixes some of the issues with the previous version.... maybe I'm chasing an unsaveable image... I did cross-processing, then Julian (Austin TX) did it even more, and now the water abstraction works I think.
From the Strobist meet-up at Dunvegan Keep, May 11th, 2008.
Stephanie. MM #156248
Playing with a recent shot of my daughter. Shot with a hi(ish) ISO as this was taken in the morning hours. Cross processed with a Kodak Elite 100 look in DXO Labs 6.2
equipement: 5DII & Canon 135mm f/2 wide open. No crop.
Taken with Tokina 14-24mm f4 with CPL filter. Cross Process to enhanced the forming of the clouds and colors.
Should I cross process the picture? I am always asking myself about this question. There are lot of friends out there against the cross process. They are preferred the picture fresh from the memory card and untouched.
Digital photography is another type of art. Art itself is the criticism. It is either you like it or not.
If cross process able to enhanced the effect or impact. Why not?
Nikon FE-2, Kodak Ektachrome 100 (cross processed) Vivatar 285 Thyrister flash off camera right, through umbrella Cactus triggers. Epson 4490 scanner.
I tried out the digital cross processing tutorial from here, as recommended by Photojojo www.layersmagazine.com/curvy-cross-processing.html
And I got this! Yay!
And if you're weirded out by the fish heads, here's the back story:
My mom was making homemade sardines the other day and would only use the fish bodies. These chopped heads were discarded after I took the photo. Look at their accusing eyes (you murdered us, they say). Ehehe.
Doubles with frauspatzi for the lomography.de christmas filmswap double rumble | Lomo LC-Wide, Fuji Sensia 400, cross-processed
Been experimenting more with my developing. This is expired color film processed with black and white chemicals. After scanning it left this interesting sepia look from the brownish/red film base. Enjoy!
Cross processed expired kodak ultramax
kodak d-76 1:1 7min @ 24ºC
Photo of the Palace Theater, downtown Albany taken January 3, 2011. Shot with Ektachrome 120 film, in a Rolleiflex Automat camera, then cross-processed with C-41 development. Photo by Chuck Miller.
My first cross-processing experiment resulted a completely green film (top scan).
Does anyone have an idea what might have gone wrong with my first cross-processed film? I used Rollei Digibase C-41 chemicals and Fuji Sensia 100 slide film. I developed the slide film like I would have developed a print film. The chemicals were still usable.
What did I do wrong here? Nothing apparently, Sensia turns pink when it's cross-processed.
Shot with a Mamiya 645 Pro TL & 80mm f/2.8 lens... Fuji Velvia 50, Cross Processed...Scanned with my Epson 4490
Shot in a local grocery store after one of last year's hurricanes. I think it was Francis, I sort of lost track of what photo was taken when after Charley *lol*. Anyway, since we lost power, all the perishables had to be removed.
This was shot with Kodak ASA 800 film. I found a neat curve for Photoshop that allows you to mimic the cross- processed effect.
The scan of this print did not work as well as I wanted it to but this is one of my fav landscape pics, taken from the dirt road running behind the Langeberg Mountains, past Tradouw towards Heidelberg. The "sheep" on the hill are actually rocks; the colours are all distorted because of the cross processing.
~ Scan of print taken with an old Canon SLR (cross process film)
This is Heather. She's a bicyclist, bacontarian, and made fun of me for saying she looked like a borg in a shot (I misspoke, too. What I meant to say was that she looked like she was being disintegrated by the daleks. Silly me)
Totally one of the more pleasant to work with models I've ever worked with. See, from outside, you might think that the best models are the ones with the biggest boobs or skinniest waistline. But it's really about being cooperative and evocative and such.
I barely have enough room downstairs to fit a person in the focusing and frame size of Joy's 360mm lens.
Strobist details: White background paper, Vivitar 285HV triggered off of a FlashZebra optical slave, Sunpak 622 with zoom head at wide above her and to the left, optically triggered. Sunpak 622 with plain head to the right, cable triggered. All bare heads.
We have a few wind chimes in the back garden, glass ones of a butterfly and dragonfly. I wanted to see what they looked like in the morning light and played around with the saturation and vibrancy.
I recently rediscovered my love for film. I dug out my old EOS film camera, affixed my 50mm prime, threw in an old roll of sensia, and went out shooting.
I decided that I could not just go back without doing something different, so I decided to do some cross processing. For those unfamiliar with this technique, cross processing involves taking slide film (E6 Process) and developing it as regular negative print film (C-41 Process). The result is an insanely saturated and high contrast image.
I also decided to do some multiple exposures.
In this image, I shot the building, then flipped over the camera and shot it again, thus infusing the cloud texture across the whole image, and creating a strange mirror effect on the top half of the frame. To enhance the dark, industrial mood of the scene, I underexposed it enormously, resulting in a very dark, noisy image, fitting for this type of industrial photography.
The scan is not very good. I can't find the negative adaptor for my scanner, so the print itself was scanned up.
This image is pure, photoshop free folks.
i love images that are cross processed.i tried myself digitaly to imitate cross processing using photoshop i am well happy with the results let me know what you think