View allAll Photos Tagged Cross_Processing,
I was never a huge fan of cross-processing my slide film in C-41 chemistry but I decided to try cross-processing FPP's RetroChrome.
I shot this image at 80 iso and had it cross-processed in C-41 chemistry to produce a color negative. Color slide film is designed to be processed E6 for a color positive. Cross-processing it will alter the color palette and give you less than realistic color tones. On this beautiful sunny day, the film cross-processed produced very pleasing colors!
FPP's RetroChrome is cold-stored expired Kodak Ektachrome hand-rolled from ultra-large cinema reels.
Canon EOS Rebel Ti camera / Processed by The Darkroom / Home-scanned via Epson V700
Hear the radio spot!
soundcloud.com/film-photography-project/retrochrome-fpps-...
nikon FA
fujichrome sensia 100 RA-687, rated at 200 iso, cross-processed normally at box speed
April, 12th. 2015.
processed and scanned at Nation Photo, Paris
nikkor AI 85mm f/2
After loading this film into my development cannister, just before I was about to pour the B&W Ilfosol3 developer in, I noiticed the empty film cartridge lying in the waste basket - it *finally* registered in my thick brain that this was a roll of Ektar 100.- a COLOUR film. Oops. I spent a little while reading various sources to determine what my options were. It seems one can develop colour film quite nicely with B&W developer. The negatives might be awkward to scan depending on your scanner but otherwise they are just fine.
This image is proof of the technique. I've done this several times over the years since and always with good results.
I haven't shot any cross processing or used my lomo since July 08. I was getting very fed up with it all. But i actually loaded a film into my lomo the other week, i haven't used it yet, but never say never.
What was I thinking!
Amazingly, there were images that I could digitize from this "disaster" by cranking up the ISO and with a long exposure with my digital camera.
Film stock: Kodak Max 400 (top 3 strips)
Expiry10/2007
Format: 135
Camera: Kodak MAX Outdoor disposable camera
Film stock: Fujifilm Superia 200 (bottom 2 strips)
Expiry ~2004
Format: 135
Camera: Ricoh RZ-770 DATE
Developer: Ilfosol3 (from Ilford Simplicity starter pack)
Time: 13.5 min @24degC
I took this hoping to capture an unusual sunset due to the ash in the sky following the Eyjafjallajökull eruption.
I don't think the ash made much difference, except perhaps in the fact that there are no vapour trails up there, all flights having been grounded.
nikon FA
fujichrome sensia 100 RA-687, rated at 200 iso, cross-processed normally at box speed
April, 12th. 2015.
processed and scanned at Nation Photo, Paris
nikkor AI-s 18mm f/3.5
After loading this film into my development cannister, just before I was about to pour the B&W Ilfosol3 developer in, I noiticed the empty film cartridge lying in the waste basket - it *finally* registered in my thick brain that this was a roll of Ektar 100.- a COLOUR film. Oops. I spent a little while reading various sources to determine what my options were. It seems one can develop colour film quite nicely with B&W developer. The negatives might be awkward to scan depending on your scanner but otherwise they are just fine.
This image is proof of the technique. I've done this several times over the years since and always with good results.
LC-A+RL
Fuji MS 100/1000
Cross Process
At P. Terry's Hamburgers awating deliciousness. She adjusted her glasses. I swooned.
A glorious sky in the Coconino National Forest, Arizona
Vivitar Extra Wide & Slim with cross processed film
After loading this film into my development cannister, just before I was about to pour the B&W Ilfosol3 developer in, I noiticed the empty film cartridge lying in the waste basket - it *finally* registered in my thick brain that this was a roll of Ektar 100.- a COLOUR film. Oops. I spent a little while reading various sources to determine what my options were. It seems one can develop colour film quite nicely with B&W developer. The negatives might be awkward to scan depending on your scanner but otherwise they are just fine.
This image is proof of the technique. I've done this several times over the years since and always with good results.