View allAll Photos Tagged Comparison
Scavenge Challenge - May2013 - Scavchal #22 - Create a diptych of an old shot a new photo taken at the same site and of approximately the same view. Old photo must be from at least six months ago. You may use a scanned photo or photo of a photo for the old shot (Weld with Rob)
The left photo was taken in April 2012 & the right photo yesterday. The dead tree on the right has lost it's horizontal branch and there is a little more water in the pond now and the reeds are taking over. Different times of day and different cameras. Should I have tried for the same sort of time?
Thanks for stopping by, your views and comments are always appreciated. Have a great day!
My new Field & Stream 280-lumen LED flashlight, side by side with my Ozark Trail LED Aluminum Flashlight, rated at 200 lumens.
both Jades look different, they both have different colour earrings single has yellow 5 pack has silver which works even better for her when she's redressed, and obviously single has a shaved part 5 pack doesn't which makes them look different I love the shaved part better but in a different outfit 5 pack rocks, I wonder if the others in the pack vary?
A pretty young baseball fan posed for me next to this wheel. Gives you some idea of the size and weight of a steam locomotive.
This is not a real comparison. I'm very sorry but I don't have time at the moment ;__; I'll do a proper comparison as soon as I find some time.. I hope you will find this pics a little bit useful tho.
The parade of differences continues on the backside. The rocket shown in the rocket firing version DOESN'T fire, the one that fires is one of those silly long ones that come with modern toys. I guess they have comply with safety rules even for things that aren't sold in stores. The missile you see in his back is for display purposes only.
Fiber comparison for some bast fibers I have. From left to right - 'waste' from combing nettle fibers, similar to flax tow. The uncombed nettle fibers then combed nettle fibers. Unbleached commercially prepared flax, bleached commercially prepared flax.
Here's some side by side comparison shots of the two Lady Tremaine dolls, in her day dress by Disney Store and her ball gown by Mattel. I really can't pick which one I prefer, and it's for all the right reasons! I look at one and think that's the best until I see the other and change my mind. One thing I love about these two dolls is that we get two different outfits instead of two different versions of the same outfit. So if you're debating which one to get, make it easy on yourself and just get both. Who needs to eat a meal everyday anyway?
The notes tell the story. Just a comparison shot to see the size/height of Drury Falls and the mass of mountains just outside of Leavenworth, Wa. Previous shot of the falls is also taken at full optical telephoto setting, this one at full wide-angle.
Muslin comparison. The size 8 (on the right) did not come up high enough for my liking so I worked on the size 6
Here's a comparison between October and today with Zack's hair loss. He's definately losing a lot more right now with this round of chemo.
Taken with a Panasonic GX80 at Blists Hill, Victorian Town
See the comparison picture taken with the Zenit 122
both versions of the Jun, Juku Couture doll.
on the left the Target version in a dress made by Mama Bunny.
On the right, the Toys R Us 1st release version, in her original fresh from the box outfit.
There was a significant difference in the price ranges of the dolls new!
Took a comparison photo of the no-bangs Abbeys I have. It was for someone specific, but I figured I could post it here in case it’s helpful.
(The one cut off on the very left was a skull shores duplicate, so I cropped her out)
Noticed that her blue skin color varies a bit too. The older Skull Shores version is a much lighter blue.
Unity College students create coral fragment mounts in a marine ornamental aquaculture course taught by Christian Carlson. Made from clay in the college pottery studio, the mounts mimic natural rock and will be used to mount propagated corals onto before they are sold to pet shops.
Lens comparison: Nikon 70-200 f/4 vs. Sigma 24-105 f/4 vs. Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro.
This one is from the Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro.
The fixed focal length of 150 mm forced me to zoom with my feet, i.e. I am considerably farther away from the subject than with the Sigma 24-105 f/4, so depth of field is shallower here than in the previous shot even though it's the same aperture (f/5.6).
The part that is in focus is tack-sharp, as expected from a macro prime lens. The focus point was on the stem of the second (from top to bottom) red tomato for all shots.
Now, this is a dedicated macro lens, and a prime lens, too. It doesn't get any sharper than this. This is the benchmark.
How did the other two candidates fare? I'd say outstandingly. Those three lenses clearly are on par when it comes to sharpness. Zooms that can keep up with this kind of macro lens - that's really amazing.