View allAll Photos Tagged process

Result processing shared image

Processed with VSCO with j5 preset

Is that snow? or is it ash..

Processed with VSCO with v4 preset

Best spot ever to work

Project: Kateri & Trent Wedding Package

Client: Kateri & Trent

 

Process: Offset & Letterpress

Inks: 2/0 (Pantone Ink)

Paper: Kraft Duplex

nikon EM | 50mm f1.8 | ektar 100

Processed with VSCO with j2 preset

Processed with VSCO with c1 preset

After passing the Lab-test, the first process is called "skinning", is to peel off the skin of the fish.

 

©ILO/Fauzan Azhima

 

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO License. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/deed.en_US.

Loining is to clean what is inside the fish stomach, inside bones and inside read meat of the fish. This process where all women workers are involved.

Spent a few hours this evening processing files. I have a whole bunch of images that have been sitting on memory cards for a few weeks. Nice to stay put, put some headphones on and listen to some music while going through images.

 

Canon Speedlite 580EX at 1/2camera left bounced off white reflector. Gridded Nikon SB-28 at 1/8 to my right. Both flashes triggered by Elinchrom Skyports.

File name: 08_06_003818

 

Title: Ticker Tape Parade

 

Creator/Contributor: Jones, Leslie, 1886-1967 (photographer)

 

Date created: 1917 - 1934 (approximate)

 

Physical description: 1 negative : glass, black & white ; 4 x 5 in.

 

Genre: Glass negatives

 

Subjects: Parades & processions

 

Notes: Title from information provided by Leslie Jones or the Boston Public Library on the negative or negative sleeve.; Date supplied by cataloger.

 

Collection: Leslie Jones Collection

 

Location: Boston Public Library, Print Department

 

Rights: Copyright © Leslie Jones.

 

Preferred citation: Courtesy of the Boston Public Library, Leslie Jones Collection.

  

Intermediae Madrid

April 2009

I have this cool app on my phone, that I did this cross process effect on this pic, let me know what you think!

newest member of the codedNeurosis series - romanticObsession . . .

 

coded in Processing

www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e9CkhBb18E

 

"You talkin' to me? You talkin' to me? You talkin' to me? Then who the hell else are you talkin' to? You talkin' to me? Well I'm the only one here. Who the fuck do you think you're talking to?"

 

Used by Il guscio sporco in this work

And that is what I get out of one flight, about a 1000 images and a good chuck of computation time.

A couple of people have asked how unbooks differ from wikis. That's a great question and led to some reflection and a conversation with my friend Alan Smith (Thanks Alan!) which yielded a few insights.

 

The top line: Unbooks and wikis are similar in some ways but different in others.

 

Similarities: Both wikis and unbooks:

 

1) Are subject to constant and continuous change.

 

2) Involve communities who are interested in developing content or topic areas.

 

3) Can have multiple authors.

 

4) Have multiple defined roles within the community, i.e., reader, author, editor, etc.

 

Differences:

 

1) A wiki community is centered around online content in the form of hyperlinked web pages, while an unbook community is centered around printed content in the form of a book.

 

2) The number of pages in a wiki is conceptually unlimited, while the number of pages in an unbook is limited by its presence in the physical world. The limits may vary but my self-imposed limit is around 400 pages. This forces constant winnowing of the content to a finite set.

 

3) Because of the size limitation, an unbook's online content has a tendency to greatly exceed the printed content. This forces more rigor into the editorial process for the printed content. The online content supplements and reinforces the ideas in the book, and also forces change in the book over time. The result is that the unbook is a tightly edited, up-to-date summary of what can be found on the web.

 

4) A wiki does not have a linear narrative while an unbook does: Before a physical book can be printed the order of its pages must be determined.

 

5) An unbook has natural offshoots (the physical objects) where the content is frozen in time. This allows one to take a historical look at an unbook in a different way than a wiki. In a wiki, you can look at the evolution of individual pages but it's difficult to have an "entire snapshot" of the wiki at a particular instant in time.

 

6) A wiki can include motion and video while an unbook can only point to such things -- the print media has constraints. These constraints can be valuable and are well-known: The unbook needs no electicity and never goes down. It can be archived for thousands of years. When reading an unbook one is less subject to interruption by IM, email, dings and beeps, etc.

 

7) I suppose the primary difference is one of intentions and expectations.

 

An unbook is a narrative object: a developing narrative, a story that may change significantly over time, like a children's story that is told and retold with additions and changes by multiple authors. Like a story an unbook has a clear beginning and end, although those things might change over time.

 

A wiki is a map object: a virtual space that can be searched, explored and navigated in various ways. A wiki, like a physical space, has many starting and ending points. You can enter a wiki many ways and there is no "end" to a wiki.

 

These are just one person's thoughts. I hope you will add your thoughts and comments to this interesting thread.

 

theunbook.com

Computer, Massive Parallel Processor, Processor Unit & Expansion Unit.

 

This is part of an experimental computer, developed in the mid-1980s by the Goodyear Aerospace Corporation for the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. The comptuer derives it name from its ability to operate on large arrays of data in parallel, i.e. on many numbers at once. By contrast, computers of conventional design operate on one or at most a few pieces of data per cycle. One intended application for such a design was the analysis of the large amounts of data received by remote sensing satelliltes.

 

The Massively Parallel Processor represented one of several approaches to the problem of processing data in parallel. Nearly all modern supercomputers use parallel processing, although not all follow this machine's architecture.

 

Transferred from NASA to the Museum in 1996.

Transferred from NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center

  

2x mode is a basic smoother

La Fabrique Pola, sun rays and menacing clouds.

A black & white photo. of a Grainer y processing, plant slightly sepia toned.

 

View on Black

Processing 20,000 Herring fresh off the Marine Star at Taku Smokeries

Processed with VSCO with e3 preset

Redlands, Ca ---Umbrella Alley

Fuji Velvia processed in c-41

Processed with VSCO with f2 preset

Processed with VSCOcam with f2 preset

Image from Haley Lorenson Pimp my Pixels.

 

Glamor magazine process: Skin soften, blemishes remove, eye resizing, nose resizing, cheeks resizing, light painting, pop up eye colors + Cross Process effect using curves.

 

Original size:

farm5.static.flickr.com/4048/4312879227_d392bbb758_o.jpg

Processed with VSCO with 6 preset

January,2008

aesthetic & computing

with Processing

1 2 ••• 54 55 57 59 60 ••• 79 80