View allAll Photos Tagged fail
frequently used in my household.
ilovedrywell.blogspot.com/2009/12/winning-fail.html
part of the "everything is the worst" series
Hurray, I have finally gotten my 5D Mk II, but I have been a bit occupied. I wanted to take a quick shot and process it, but the result is less than good :(
Btw. The output from Photomatix for 3 exposures is a tiff that is about 123MB, and the processed shot with a few layers is about 700 MB O_o
Had to get insurance for the car. Today I found my mailbox stuffed with FIVE (count 'em) separate letters from Allstate.
This is a broken system.
This is how my day pretty much started out, and figured this is how my day was going to keep going until I got a email saying...
‎"Dear Sylvia Perry,
Congratulations! The Admissions Committee is very pleased to offer you admission to the Art Institute Of Pittsburgh - Online Division."
I'm sooo excited! It's been a long process over the last few months trying to get accepted into the Art Institute, but I finally did!!! Whoop Whoop! Now I can work on getting my Bachelors of Science in Photography!!!
With the shunter hitching a ride we see Class 81 81013 + failed 86214 Sans Pareil running out of Birmingham New Street. 07/07/1979.
image Kevin Connolly - All rights reserved so please do no use this without my explicit permission
Got bored. Figured since I made a lolcat poster, I might as well make a demotivator, too.
Created with fd's Flickr Toys
Also I fail at directions.
SEE COMMENTS. We were at York studying and we saw him outside the window. This FAIL is dedicated to you. You FAILed as a man.
In relatively poor light, with the clocks going forward, although not as dark as its passage should have been, a disgraced 59003 is dragged through Sheffield station at 0840 this morning some 2 1/2 hours after its booked slot. The loco gave up the ghost at Morton Junction and had to be rescued by FL 66559. On the far side of the station 66769 was sat waiting to take the train onto Tinsley having worked 0G99 Doncaster Down Decoy to Tinsley. I'm lead to believe the loco swap took place around Woodburn Junction and 66769 worked the empties back to Bardon Hill alone, 66559 returning alone with 59003 presumably abandoned or waiting fitters attention at Tinsley.
An addendum for the future. 66559 ran all the way into Tinsley and then returned le to Woodburn running up the start of the Stocksbridge branch to allow 769 to work through to Tinsley. 66559 then headed back to Toton via Beighton and 769 returned the empties to Bardon Hill with 59003 on the rear (apparently)
Oooops, nearly forgot. Thanks to Paddy Oates for mentioning it had failed via text as I was walking out of the station 20 minutes earlier. Otherwise I would have missed it.
Oh, do you want to actually READ THE GRAPH in this here image? Well, just buy a handy "Pro Account"! Gee, thanks, let me get right on that. Actually, maybe I'll go look at a web site that doesn't actively try to PREVENT me from looking at it.
Attention web site people: it's 2009. Creative Commons happened already. Wikipedia happened already. If you're going to be all Expert's Exchange about this thing, you're going to end up relegated to that ass end of the internet where no one clicks on your search results because you're just using your content as a big link-baiting advertisement.
And actually, it's not even YOUR content! You're just sharecropping your USERS content -- content which, since you just recently started this lock-up, they didn't think would be hidden when they uploaded it. Sure, I'm sure it's legal by the technicalities of the license agreement that no one reads. But it's not how your site used to work, and it breaks the spirit of the implicit contract you have with your users. And it breaks the community's spirit.
I don't get why people with good stuff on Instructables wouldn't just delete their articles and take them somewhere else that doesn't have a lame paywall. Seriously, people, it's your content. Why are you letting someone else try to monetize it... by HIDING it from everyone else?
Here's a not-new idea: Why don't you offer me a POSITIVE BENEFIT for buying an account (like the ability to comment, or rate up/down, or access to contests, or different ways to browse/search the content, or whatever) instead of TAKING AWAY the basic functionality from your site and then trying to force me to pay to get it back. Chances are I'm walking away instead of forking out cash if I can't simply click around and see stuff on your site without nag-dialogs spamming me.
Update: another, less ranty, take at theonda.org/articles/2009/06/19/dont-let-your-mission-bec...
username : "joestump",
title : "FAIL",
content url : "https://www.flickr.com/photos/joestump/2424268848/"
I was actually pretty happy with the crane, because I finally managed to get a good reach. It couldn't actually lift anything though.
Will be demolishing this in my coming weekend and start building something completely different.
i'm back, after a failed attempt going out as a girl, my worst makeup ever, poor quality pic and my big male face.... I am thinking about how can I do to look more feminine
username : "joestump",
title : "FAIL",
content url : "https://www.flickr.com/photos/joestump/2424268848/"
i tried out the benelli nova, but how you can see i hardly failed, the stock and reciver were good, but when i came to the handguard ...
Ref : www.benelliusa.com/shotguns/benelli-nova-pump-tactical.php
P.S. GOT CS:GO