View allAll Photos Tagged document
So I've been l ooking for a good antique document to include in my still life photography. Although there are sources out there, I couldn't really find one that suited me or my price range.
As I was Googling, it hit me... why not print one of the many photos? After moderate tweaking and aging in Paint Shop Pro, I came up with what I think is a reasonable facsimile.
São Paulo, 15-08-2016 - Entra em vigor no Brasil a Convenção da Apostila da Haia. Foto: Luiz Silveira/Agência CNJ
Type the text you see on the page above in the comments box below. Don't worry about structure, even if the data is in a family tree format. Just type what you see without correcting it. FEEL FREE TO ONLY TRANSCRIBE A SMALL PART OF THE PAGE.
If the text is too small to read, consider opening the image in a new window by right clicking on the zoom magnifying glass at the top of the page. In the new window, you can select different image sizes.
Your help will make this document more easily "findable" by those who need it.
View our entire family records collection here: statelibrary.ncdcr.gov/digital/ncfamilyrecords/
Bergen-Belsen..
I've been here several times and I'm sure I'll visit again on my travels up North... Unexpectedly, it is always a place where I enjoy taking photographs. Perhaps it is something to do with all the space and the fact that it is often very quiet and sparsely populated.
Boston Conservatory. Year/Subjects Unknown.
Do you know who's in this photo or when it was taken? If so, leave a comment below.
Visitors joined us at the August Friday Late and explored how a new kind of growing is springing up across our capital. Faced with a continuing population boom and climate change, discover how citizens are leading the revolution in food production and helping to create a more edible city.
#FridayLate
ADR is awesome.
I'm not telling you this because I'm an ADR practitioner and geek, but because I do think it's a good idea.
ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) refers to the myriad different, often very tailored, procedures to enable dispute resolution outside court. This encompasses mediation (where an impartial mediator helps the parties achieve an agreement), arbitration (where an umpire is appointed by the parties to decide the dispute), adjudication (similar to arbitration, mostly used in the construction context), conciliation (used mainly in the employment context, it refers to a procedure similar to mediation), and so on. In many ways, it's a new animal - it has only had its current formidable importance since the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 - before litigation, parties will need to either try ADR or have a damn good reason why they didn't, or face having to pay their own costs even if they win. In other ways, it's age-old - the protagonist of the Brennu-Njals Saga is a mediator named Njal who, unenviably, gets torched for his activities.
Why do I think ADR is cool? For a number of things. It's best summarised by this: it is cheap, and as cheerful as an adversarial affair gets. It is also faster in most cases, and importantly, it can give remedies which a court cannot. I've seen people sue others for every last penny of theirs when all they wanted was an apology - no court can order an apology, but arbitrators can. Mediators love telling war stories. To me, however, the main advantage is its distinct lack of drama.
Litigation in courts is a bit like Amy Winehouse. Ego-laden, loud, dramatic, hysterical and sometimes containing more blow than is strictly recommended. It's glamorous, but loud and at times annoying.
ADR is like Beethoven. It's powerful but in an understated, harmonic way. It's out to make you think and feel without shouting at you. It's majestic but in a reserved way. It can be loud. Hell, it *CAN* be loud. But it never shouts for shouting's sake.
I've seen my share of both regimes. I like ADR. I appreciate that it is not appropriate everywhere (areas with a 'third-party' or 'public' interest like child care or crime are absolute areas of exclusion. In some cases, where things just got bitter, ADR is not appropriate, either. But for the cases where it is appropriate, it is a wonderful and cheap-as-chips method of dispute resolution.
You know what else is cheap and cheerful? The little document tags I wrote AWESOME! on. I got them from the wonderful @cardiffbites, and they brightened my day. Most of my books are pretty heavily tagged with them. Sometimes I just tag things because I love the colours. Sometimes we all need a little colour in our lives, and sometimes something very cheap and simple will do - cheap and cheerful. A hug, a smile, a few kind words all cost nothing. Small, colourful things are cheap as chips. Yet they can do so much for someone's mood.
So give someone you love something cheap and cheerful today. Or just hug them. It's good for their health, too.
(and the next time you want to go to court, get mediation instead - keep my profession alive)
(disclaimer: the claim forms in the back are practice claim forms I wrote from fictional fact patterns - I would never, EVER, put real client confidential material on flickr) The book, btw, is the brilliant Arbitration Awards book by Turner.
John McCracken mirrored column, untitled, 2007 bronze; in the room where one entered the Fridericianum
photo by Andrea Kirsh
Secuencia de fotos del documental homónimo, sobre los jornaleros cortadores de caña en el estado de Nayarit. Realizado por Jonathan Hinojosa.
Old document from the swedish postoffice. Feel free to use in your art but do not reproduce or sell. I would love it if you showed me your artwork made with this picture! Happy creating!
Vejam como a JUSTIÇA PERSEGUE MANUEL PINTO FERREIRA do Marco de Canaveses em PORTUGAL.
Entregou em 9 de Outubro de 2006 uma denuncia no Tribunal do Marco de Canaveses e que envolve 3 JUIZAS. A queixa não foi considerada denuncia caluniosa pelos magistrados, nem pelas juízas denunciadas, mas alguém ficou incomodado com a denuncia e inventou um REQUERIMENTO FALSO com data de 23 de Novembro de 2006, e nele FALSIFICOU A SUA ASSINATURA (por montagem que fizeram da queixa que apresentou em 9 de Outubro de 2006, ver os 2 documentos) para o denunciante vir a ser condenado como sucedeu por FACTOS FALSOS que não praticou.Depois com base no Requerimento Falso moveram 2 processos crime a Manuel Pinto Ferreira (Procº 791/06.5TAMCN do 2º juízo para lhe ROUBAREM uma arma de caça que já lhe devolveram e o Procº 141/07.3TAMCN do 2º juízo para lhe aplicarem 8 meses de cadeia).Pelos mesmos factos, no Procº 791/06 os magistrados arquivaram o processo nessa parte por o requerimento falso ser um simples cópia, foi apenas julgado pela posse de arma proibida tendo sido absolvido e a arma devolvida.Mas depois no Procº 141/07 pelos mesmos factos os magistrados condenaram Manuel Pinto Ferreira em 8 meses de prisão efectiva por factos falsos que não praticou.Para o denunciante se defender da Acusação nomearam-lhe a ADVOGADA SUSANA CUNHA MENDES, mas como esta ABRIU INSTRUÇÃO e Requereu Exame PERICIAL À LETRA E ASSINATURA no requerimento inventado para o efeito, e como também Requereu Acareação com a QUEIXOSA JUIZA MARIA DA CONCEIÇÃO CORREIA DA CRUZ BUCHO Anularam a Abertura de Instrução e substituíram logo aquela advogada pela DRª SILVIA TEIXEIRA FERREIRA para o poderem condenar como sucedeu. Na verdade esta advogada nada fez para o defender, apesar de saber que o requerimento em discussão era uma simples cópia, e apesar de saber que ninguém pode ser condenado por simples fotocopia não requerer qualquer exame pericial, nem à letra, nem à assinatura, nem às impressões digitais deixadas na carta quem enviaram ao tribunal com o requerimento falso.Por à justiça só interessar a verdade e só a verdade, e por se tratar de uma falsidade propositada, Manuel Pinto Ferreira Requereu pelo seu punho Exame Pericial à sua Assinatura feita do requerimento falso, mas a JUIZA CRISTIANA DA SILVA JORGE imediatamente indeferiu a requerida pericia à letra.Será que para a juíza interessa mais calar o denunciante com 8 meses de prisão do que apurar a verdade ? Será que à juíza interessa mais condenar um inocente do que averiguar quem por má-fé falsificou documentos ?Ou será que pretendem encobrir quem inventou o requerimento falso e falsificou a sua assinatura ?
DOCUMENTAL SOBRE JAVIERA MENA Y GEPE.
VEAN EL TRAILER