View allAll Photos Tagged developers,
This photo is licensed under a Creative Commons license. If you use this photo within the terms of the license or make special arrangements to use the photo, please list the photo credit as "Scott Beale / Laughing Squid" and link the credit to laughingsquid.com.
From my days as an intern on the san antonio light newspaper. Messing around with a string dipped in developer.
Using Blazanol 1-100. Quit using it when I was getting a lot of bromide drag. New bottle seems OK but still not a favorite developer but here wasn't a whole lot of choice for developers and I didn't want to experiment yet on this film.
2/4
Developers at the facebook f8 hackathon. Bart and I were going to write an app, but we were a bit tired and decided to hang out with the Red Bull peeps.
•TEPIC
992 hectares (2450 acres) on new hwy with distant ocean views. Ready for development. 4-5 km to beach. Only 65,000 pesos (appros $7150 U.S.)per hectare.(2.47 acres in a hectare)
Hasselblad Planar 80mm, SFX (715) eco film developer
a somewhat different use of lith, soft and warm and fine grained
I call this treatment "hidden lith"
moderately overexposed Fomatone 132with hard grade (magenta) filter
two tray
Easy Lith 1+10 8 mins (until the shades are clearly visable, without considerable density of midtones and lights)
Catechol 1+100 3 mins for full tonal range and warm hue
This is part of a Creative Commons Retro Web Developer series.
Visit www.bumbleb2na.com/art/RetroWebDev to download and use high quality pixel and vector versions of this and others like it
The PC-TEA developer has a very good life span and is based on Ascorbic Acid (Vit. C) dissolved in TEA (Tri-Ethanol-Amine) an alkohol and comparible with Xtol (1+2) in developing times. It yields the film speed very good and gives negatives with fine grain, excellent sharpness, improved resolving power and strong drawing of lights and shadows.
Use 1+50 or 1+75 for the film development at approx. 20 oC. Receipt of Patrick Gainer.
"made in Ukraine"
Every software project involves aspects of risk. With respect to the nature from the project, these risks can differ, however they could possibly be grouped into five groups.
5 Kinds of software developer Risk
Budget Risk: the chance of projects groing through budget. Possibly the most typical risk in software development and frequently associated with other risks.
Personnel Risk: the chance of losing or lack of project team people. Even when for a while, this can lead to delays and errors.
Understanding Risk: when you will find understanding silos or even the change in details are poor. The entire process of relearning leads to additional labor, time, and sources.
Productivity Risk: this risk is typical in lengthy projects, specially when deadlines and goals are lengthy-term. This atmosphere creates deficiencies in immediacy which leads to deficiencies in emergency of labor.
Time Risk: product delays are-too-common in software developer often the outcomes of poor planning, impractical timelines, and also the lack of ability to adjust to altering product needs.
Managing These Risks in Agile Development
Startup Stock Photos
The agile methodology inherently addresses a number of these risks. That stated, they're still prevalent in lots of agile environments, frequently due to project team mistakes, planning errors, failures in process, and unpredicted changes as products evolve. Here we will address each software development risk and just how it may be were able to mitigate delays, mistakes, along with other barriers to shipping a effective product.
Risk - Budget
Solution - Moving Wave Planning
In product, you always make assumptions that can't be proven or disproven until more details opens up. As development progresses, objectives or goals may shift, or even the product might need to pivot to become viable.Moving wave planning is made to take into account this. Teams make product decisions when they're within the best position to ensure software developer are, instead of presenting very detailed plans at the outset of the work.
Old pack I discovered in my shelves. Powder pack for 1 litre, in two parts (A and B). .
Bought in France, 1982 or late 1981 (see the label, dated 09/81, this means that it was manufactured before this date).
Ultra fine grain film developer, for small tanks or trays. It can process up to 10 films with 1 min time increase for each film already processed. I think however that +1 min was too much.
I didn't use it much, I used much more Atomal FF, another Agfa fine-grained developer that wasn't same as Atomal. That one was available in bigger professional packs for 5 litres or more.
I can't say if this 33+ year old pack can still be good for use. I would never throw it away without checking it. :)
New York State Chief Digital Officer & Deputy Secretary for Technology Rachel Haot speaks during an App Quest 3.0. event sponsored by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, AT&T, Transit Wireless, and New York University’s Center for Urban Science and Progress (CUSP), to announce winners in their global competition to solicit development of new mobile solutions designed to help improve commutes for millions of subway, bus and rail riders across the five boroughs. Photo: Metropolitan Transportation Authority / Patrick Cashin