View allAll Photos Tagged csss
Into the third month of Winter, and California's drought continues. These magnificent clouds brought no rain to the Central San Francisco Bay Area. The setting sun is reflecting off the windows in the bottom of the photo. We'd lose San Francisco on the bottom far right if I crop out the reflections.
Taken from North Berkeley Hills, looking across San Francisco Bay to San Rafael, Marin County, California.
.
~ .
--. . ---.--.
130. 128 A-UL-Rehman SL C PC AS ! l\t.A.-111---:I ·-· -· --"---·.
131. 128 Shamsurrab . SL CAAS 1\-1. A .-Ill.
132. 129 Manoj Kumar sss CSRD M.A.-I ! SC.
133. 129 Chandra Prakash Morya sss CSRD l\-t.Phil.-1 II-----sc-· .
134. 130 Alok Kumar Pandey SIS RCAS M.Phil.-1 --·..
135. 130 K. Aresh Kumar SIS RCAS P.HD.-111 one ..
136. 131 Kalathi V. SLL&CS CIL PH.D.-I OBC.
137. 131 Sudhaveni Naresh SIS RCAP P.HD.-111 OBC--··--.
138. 132 Anurag SAA SAA M.~-IIJ sc.
139. 132 Rahul Kumar Gupta .
SL CSP B.A.-HI.
140. 133 Pankaj sss CESP OBC .
M.A.-III OBC.
141. 133 Amit Kuntar sss CESP M.Phil.-1 sc.
142. 134 Nabiel Ansari .
SL CSP Ph.D.-III OBC.
143. 134 Md. J. Zaman SL C IL Ph.D.-VIT . -OBC..
144. 135 Soham Pain SL CNG Ph.D.-Ill ·--.
145. 135 Mantu Sarkar css css M.A.-I .. sc . .
146. 136 Ajit Kumar SSS: CPS Ph.D.-1 OBC.
147. 136 Anil Kumar Singh SL--CIL M.A.-I sc.
148. 137 Arun Kumar Kashyap SLS SLS PH.D.-III--.. . OBC.
149. 13,7 Abhishek Pratap Singh SIS CEAS PH.D-I.
150. 138 Raj Kumar Meena .
SLL&CS CGS P.HD.-III ST.
151. 138 Shamseer K. SIS SIS M.A.-Ill OBC.
. 152. 139 Ravindra Kumar sss csss M.A.-I -.. sc .
.
I -----.
153. 139 Deen Dayal SL ccs B.A.-III sc.
154. 140 Prashant Upadhaya sss CSRD _ P.HD.-.111ISS. 140 Anand Kumar SIS RCA-s-· M.Phil.-11 1 -OBC.
156. 141 Siddharth Gautam sss CHS M.A.-III sc.
157. 141 Aditya Mittal .
· SL CSP B.A.-III.
158. 142 Akram Pervez SL · CIL PH.D.-[ --. OBC159 142 Jamal Akhtar SL CIL M.Phil.-1 .
--------..
160. 143 Jayaram Singh Samal CLG CLG Ph.D.-Ill.
161. 143 Nihar Prasad Nayak SIS SEAS M.Phil.-111 OBC. .
--. ----·..
162. 144 Ankush Gupta SAA SAA P.HD.-Ill -.
163. 144 Ankit Kumar Gautam sss csss M.A.-I sc -.
164. 145 .
Jawed Akhtar SL CPILAS P.HD.-HI .
. -----·..
165. 145 Ritu Raj SLL CGS M.A.-I --------.
'.
166. 146 Aditya Vardhan SLL&CS CSPILAS M.A.-I -.
'..
167. 146 Tanmoy Sharma sss csss M.A.-III.
168. 147 Arkajayoti Jana.
169. sss CESP PH.D.-HI OBC147 Tejashi Roy sss CSRD M.A.-III sc.
--· --.
170. 148 Virendra Kumar sss GAE Ph.D.-III OBC' 171. 148 Manzar Kamal SLL&CS CIL M.Phil.-11 l OBC.
172. 149 Gaurav Kumar Jha SIS CULS M.Phii.-III .
· ·~ -.
·--.
173. 149 .
Sumit Raj SLS SLS P.HD.-Ill.
174. 150 Kanhaiya Kumar SL CFFS PH.D.-I--.
I .
' .
~ .
.
~ .
.
Storm clouds frequently gather over the Stanislaus River canyon as moisture rises towards the second highest pass in the Sierra Nevada Mountains.
.
0 .
.
c J"46R .
Na_yan tara .
r;r phif.
-~---.
-· -.. -. _ _ ___ SfS/L;~ .
46R .
ANUSRITA MANDAL .
rv1 f'J IlL.
-----.-.
47R SCSS/CSS.
Verma Priyadarshini ---.
Ph L.J I .
~ ------·-.
47R O[y Ro_y_ SAS .
/ ----------------~---.
-----......_,. . -~ --Ph.D .
-· SSS/CHC"'.
48R DEEP JYOTI FRANCIS ------.
\..--~8R --Ph.D .
SSS/CSS.
Apila Sangtam -.
MA.
49R Sl.
PRIYA SALAM .
.
.
--MA.
49R VINEETA KUMAR! CHS/SS.
M.Phil .
SOR Sonali Mahanta CHS/SSMA.
SOR NITIKA GAURAV SI/CLI1.
MSC. .
. ..
51R Amrit Shree BIOT/SB. .
-.
M.A .
51R CIL/S .
Kumari AU;>ana Prasad .
BA.
RASHMIREKHA SL/CJKNEA~8 ~2R BEHERA -1.
MPHIL .
~ ~52R SIS/RCJ.
Vandana Gu_2_ta ___,.
MPHIL.
53R SISIWA~.
.
Anwesha ROY .
-.
PHD.
53R SSS/CHS.
Tanya Saira George MPHIL.
l 54R SAS/SIS.
.
-Linotoli Z. Awomi .
1.
I 54R Khekali M.sc s::>s, PHD .
SSS/CHS . 1 55R .
SONMATI PATEL ' .
" -.
\lL ()!\ ~MA.
v 5R SCSS/SANS r.
RICHA B. CHANDOLA MA.
56R PIS/SIS : I .
Samina Rehman M ._phil.
.Y.
/p ~~ v 56R Zainab Akhter SSS/CSSS .
M.PHIL .
57R Sarita Yadav SIS/CIPOD I .
.
M. phil.
57R Kanika Sharma -. --· css M.Phil.
58R SIS/ESS.
.
PooJa Chhim£a _ 58R Anita Meena BA SL/CJK -M.PHIL .
59R css.
.
-.
..
59R -, ~.
NUSRAT AMEEN -I .
M.PHIL .
60R -CIL/SLL&CS.
Shehla Rashid Shara ---------.
MA.
60R SSS/CSSS.
AMRITA MANDAL M.PHIL .
61R .
RAHEENA K. . ___ --SSS/~H~I MA .
'--·-61R Rash_!lli Singh CENG/SL -·-.... MA 1.
SSS/CSSS I .
~·----.
.
.
.
.
continues in case of othercontracts like cleaning staff and migrantworkers related problems..
on the sprawling construction sites. Further,other legally mandated facilities.
like creches, first aid, toilets for men and women, rest room, display More computers in SSS: Computer rooms insociaJmedicine,.
to have more computers, existing compUters to be.
.
boards citing minimum wages and right etc... are still afar cry. Ensuring.
the functioning of the Committee and enforcing minimum wage and other Remedial courses in languages to be made functional.
labourla'NS on thecampus must be apriority for theJNUSU. Audio-visual transmission facilities in classrooms.
Key lnfrastructurallssues of Placement Cells, Hostels, Library, Health Sanitation of toilets in both buildings.
and Sports Facilities .
.
JNUSU must take up the issues of infrastructure and student facilities, SLL&CS.
including building of new hoste.ls, expansion of central and .
.
Placement cell forthe students of SLL&CS.
departmental libraries. increase of timing of libraries. expansion ofcomputers in the central library, student representation in library committees, Increase the number of optionals and theseatsthereof, streamlineand expansion and improvement of computerfacilities in the schools, their allotment process. extending the timing of documentation centre during the exams, Speedy Acceptance ofAlimiat and Fazeelat certificates forB.AFirstrepresentation of students in library commil'lees. Year admissions. .
The regularisation of centralised placement cell,expansion of hostel Election to Student-Facuity Committee (SFC) election should be heldand health centre facilities,wi-fi facilities,democratic formulation for each centre. of Xlth plan are some of the key issues that must addressed on an Immediate functionalisation of Languge lab in the SL Extensionurgent basis, 6.1ncreasethe frequency of bus to Down.
Expansion of Sports Facilities with acentral gym,two additional lawn Campus at critical hours like 9a.m,11a.m and 2p.m.tennis courts, canteen in the stadium area. extension of timing of the sports Languagesoftwar and internet facil~iesin the computers of SLL&CS'scomplex, renovation of the Basketball Court near Tapti and set up aNew .
computer room.
Court near Tefias,Badminton courts are absent in Tapti and Lohit, sports .
.
Proper classrooms for all centres.
funds for maintanence of sports equipments. .
More language magazines,journals and daily newspaper for the.
Foreign students: JNUSU must ensure fee waivers and concessions SLL&CS Common Room..
to students coming from paorer backgrounds, more so from third world.
societies. Also the various canteens and foodstails should be encouraged Water cooler with purifiermust be instaiJed in the canteen .
.
to provide items suitable to their food habits. The existing system of fee Expansion of Centre for Indian Languages (GIL) to include otherconcesions should be made more transparent and democratic. modern Indian Languages, (such as Tamil, Kanada,Malayalam, Determined Campaign Against Corporate Funding on Campus Bengali and Oriya), introduce a Comparitive Literature versus lipService programme in SLL&CS, M PhiVPhD programmes in the Koreanlanguage..
Wrth fresh onslaughts of privatization. eitheropenly or through the backdoor .
Centre-specific libraries in the School..
via corporate funding, looming over the honzon. JNUSU must leadmovements against such administrative moves. JNUSU must intensify Immediately increase the number of permanent faculties in severalthe campaign and struggle to ensure sufficient UGC fundingand reject departments like Urdu, English .
corporate funding for JNU's academic and infrastructural needs. SIS .
Students should be subsidized &encouraoed to attend natronaIandAtthe school level,the following issues should be raised: international levelseminars. .., .
Students exchange programme for M.A.Ievel students..
sss Aschool level magazine with apermanent wall magazine highlightingissues of our times.
Expansion of the Academic Programmes by turning the exist,ngWomen's Studies Programme and Programme for Studies in Expanding the ComputerCentre at the School with at least 10 computersand JSTOR facility.
Discrtmination and Exclusion into full-fledged centres; opertionalising.
of North-eastStudies Programme More participa~ion on cultural .
.
Improvement of functioning of DSA and SAP libraries: Xerox facilities Scienca Schools:.
in SAP library of CPS. CSSS library, access JSTOR and Installation of 50 computers and library facility for SPS.
computerized catalogue, departmental libraries to be accessed in .
.
Completion of new SPS buildinglunch hours, CHS DSA library ne::!ds ennchment; proper dusting, .
More regular bus service for down campus.
filing and cataloguing of books. bettermaintainence of the library in.
Zakir Husain centre. Proper mfrastructure in SIT .
.
Renovation of SIT toilets which are in pathetic conditton.
Scanning of textbooks for major courses for physically challenged.
students on an immediate basis; easy access to libraries :Ramp for Installation of computers and other required mach1nery ar.d hardware in.
DSA library, basement sectionof main library. SIT .
.
Revitalize SFCsin all centres, elections must be held; interaction Fulfilment of SC/ST quota in teaching and non-teaching appointments.
between SFCs and SSS Councillors to be regulanzed School-based library in SES.
.
Jpt1ons to take out of centre courses should be increased More field tnps for SES students.
Telephone booth in SSS 1 .
More democratic functioning and transparency 1n science schools Speedy completion of renovation e~nd removing of all construction .
sd/-Rajesh nanjan. Gen. Sccy., ATSA, JNU .
sd/-Suchcta Oe, Jl. Secy.. AISA, JNU .
J .
~ \ .
.-~.
' . _.. ,1, .
.
"Yeah...that other player is totally stealing my move" - David
"Dude...did you see that guy get owned?" - Kevin B
"Man...I have the nicest shorts here" - Blaine
"Their captain is so scared of me!" - Cory
C3S strives to offer the best and the most modern education to all the students applying from all over the world. Our portfolio of programs of Diploma, Bachelor, Master,MBA and Doctorate are offered in specialized fields that are relevant to the 21st century market. The campus is situated in the heart of the city of Barcelona, a vibrant city that absorbs young and dynamic talent pool. We are new and innovative, always challenging the convention in all aspects. Therefore, we give equal importance to cultural immersion , international experience and diversity along with academic excellence.
While some have all the knowledge about what they want and how to get it, a majority of us are very unclear about what path should one choose? And, trust us, if you’re also feeling this then you are not alone. Everyone goes through such a stage where you’re consistently surrounded by confusions and decisions, all coupled with some serious time crunch.
Our mission is to make C3S an inclusive, diverse and innovative Business School where future leaders are made.
For more information about how to get a job after graduation, you can visit: www.csss.es/how-to-get-job-after-graduation/
.
~:· I .
related problems. .
More computers in SSS: Computer roomsin social medicine,CPS, CHS.
conttnues in case of other contracts like cleaning staff and migrant workers on lhesprawling construction sites.Furtl1er, other legally mandated facilities to have morecomputers,existing computers to be made functional .
lil<.e creches. first aid. toilets for men and women. rest room, display Remedial courses in languages to be madefunctional .
boards citing mir11mum wages and right etc ...are still afar cry. Ensuring .
Audio-visual transmission facilities in classrooms .
the functioning of the Committee and enforcing minimum wage and other .
.
Sanitation ot toilets in both buildings.
labour laws on the campus must be apriority tor the JNU SU. .
Ke lnfrastructurallssues of Placement Cells Hostels Libra Health .
SLL&CS.
.
and Sports Facilities .
Placement cell for the students of SLL&CS.
JNUSU must take up the issuesof infrastructure and student facilities. .
Increase the number of optionals and the seats thereof, streamline.
including building of new hostels, expansion of central and .
departmental libraries . increase of timing of libraries, expansion of their allotment process. .
computers in the centrallibrary, student representation in library comm1ttees. Speedy Acceptance ofAlimiat and Fazee\at certificates for B.AFirst .
and expansion and Improvement of computer facilities 1n the schools, .
Year admissions. .
extending the timing of documentation centre dunng the exams. Election to Student-Facuity Committee (SFC) election should be held .
.
representation of students in library committees .
for each centre. .
The regularisation of centralised placement cell,expansion of hostel Immediate funclionalisation of Languge lab in the SL Extension .
.
and health centre facilities, wi·fi facilities, democratic formulation .
6.1ncreasethe frequencyof bus to Down .
of Xlth plan are some of the key issues that must addressed on an .
Campus at cntical hours like 9a.m,11 a.m and 2p.m. urgent basis Language sottwarand internetfacilities in the computersofSLL&CS's .
Expansion of Sports Facilities w\tll acentral gym, two additional lawn .
computer room.
.
tennis courts. canteenin the stad1um area. extension of timing of thesports .
complex, renovation of the Basketball Court near Tapti and set up aNew Proper classrooms for all centres .
More language magazines, journals and daily newspaperfor the.
Court near Teflas, Badmmton courts are absent in Tapti and Lohit sports .
SLL&CS Common Room.
funds for ma1ntanence of sports equipments. Foreign students: JNUSU must ensure fee waivers and concessions Water cooler with purifier must be installed in the canteen to students comtng from pDOrer backgrounds. more so from third world Expansion of Centre for Indian Languages (GIL) to include other societ1es. Also the various canteens and foodstalls should be encouraged modern Indian Languages, (sl.!ch as Tamil Kanada.Ma\ayalam; to provide items suitable to their food h~bits. The existing system of fee Bengali and Oriya), introduce a Comparitive L. concesionsshould be made more transparent and democratic. programme mSLL&CS, MPhiVPhDprogrammes in theKorean .
Determined Campaign Against Corporate Funding on Campus language .
Centre-soeCtflc libraries 1n the School.
versus Lip Service .
W1th fresh onslaughts of privatization.eitheropenly or through the backdoor Immediately increase the number of permanent faculties in .
via corporate funding looming over the honzon, JNUSU must lead departments hke Urdu. English .
movements against such administrative moves. JNUSU must intensify .
the campaign and struggle to ensure sutfic1ent UGC fundmg and reject Sl§ .
Students should be subsidized &encouraged to attend national and corporate funding tor JNU's academic and inlrastructural needs international level sem1nars. Students exchange programme lor M.A. level students .
.
At the school level, the following issues should be raised: Aschool level magazine with apermanent wall magazine highlighting .
.
issues of our times .
Expanding tile Computer Centre at the School with at least 10 computers.
sss.
Expansion of the Academic Programmes by turning the ex1sting .
and JSTOR fac1hly ..
Women's Studies Programme and Programme for StudieS 1n .
More part1c1pation on cultural.
Discrimination and Exclusion into full-fledged centres: opertionalising .
Science Schools:.
of North-east StudiesProgramme -- Installation of 5CJ computers and library facility for SPS.
Improvement of funct1oning of DSA and SAP libranes: Xerox facilities .
in SAP library of CPS, CSSS library, access JSTOR and Completion of new SPS building .
somputerized catalogue.departmental hbranes to be accessed 1n More regular bus service for down campus .
lunch hours, CHS DSA library ne~ds ennchment. proper dusting. .
.
Proper infrastructure in SIT.
filing and cataloguing ot books, better maintainence of the library in .
Renovation of SIT toilets which are in pathetic condition Zakir Husain centre. Installation of computers and other required macr1nery ar.d hardware in .
Scanning of textbooks lor maJOr courses for phys·1cally challenged .
I.
; SIT .
students on an immediatebasis;easyaccess to librarie£: Ramp for .
Fulfilment of SC/STquota in teaching and non-te¢ch\ngOSAlibrary, basement section of main library. .
Rev1tallz.e SF Cs in all centres, elections must be held,interaction School-based library In SES .
uetween SFCs and SSS Councillars to be regularized More field tnps for SES students .
.
More democratic functioning and transparency in scienQ.
)pttons to taKe out of centrecourses should be 1ncreased .
.
Telephone booth in SSS 1 .
.
.
SpeedY compleuon of renovation and removmg of all construction .
.
.
beta De~ Jt-.:·_: .·i:·.-'¥: .
. .
so/-Rajcsh l~anjan. Gen. Secy.. AlSA. JNU .
r;_-,,. .
.
.
Catégorie Promotion – Services : Le comité des usagers du CSSS de Memphrémagog (Estrie). Pour avoir produit une vidéo qui explique clairement les services offerts dans un centre d’hébergement.
.
.
.
Join . End the reign of discrimination!.
Public Meetin .
Fight for Justice and Inclusion!.
With JNU Faculty .
StrikeatStructures that Exclude! ,._1~1v arcn I .
. Democratisation and Strikeat Rules that Discriminate! Univ Strike StrikeatAdministrative Apathy!.
Inclusion in Academics Protest Demo .
Strikeatthe Rule ofMerit! Tqsks qn~ Challenges Stand fortheJ NU oftoday and tomorrow! in fron: of.
-· .
speakers Fightfor a Campus Open to All! AC Mee!:ng SSS·I Z.OOpm.
Indefinite Day 3.
Prot. Kamal M.. Chenov, SIS, JNU .
Ravi Prakash, Gen Secy JNUSU, Firoz, Joint SecyJNUSU, Om Prasad, .
Dr. O.K. lobival, President, JNUTA Convener SSS, Aardra, CouncilorSSS, Tabrez, CouncilorSL. Sarfaraz, .
Councilor SL, Lenin, Councilor SIS, Anagha, Anand, Arindan, Baljeet,.
.
Prot. S.N.Malalar, SIS, JNU .
Balu, Chintu, Dibya Shikha, lmran, !shan, Jitendra Kumar, Kanhaia, .
Dr. Arvind Mlsllra, SSS, JNU .
Mahendra, Martand, Nilmani, Nishant, Nitisha, Pavan, Piyush, Prot. SonaJharia Minz, sc&ss.JNU Praveen, Priyadarshini, Rohan, Ruchira, Shabbir, Vaibhav Relay Day 3.
Dr. Y.S. Alone, SAA, JNU .
Arvindan, Babita, Charu, Hasan, lrfan, Jagyaseni, Javed Wani, Kishore Dr. Maninder Jhakur, sss, JNU Gaurav, Meenakshi, Meghna, Nagmani, Niloykridika, Prashant, Raghib,.
-.
Ratnam, Rukmini, Rukmuddin, Sharath Chandra Bose, Srirupa, 17 March Tonight Ad Block 9.30pm Subodh Kunwer, Surya, Ujitra, Uma, Urba, Vidhya, VinaYt VIVek, Waaris .
JNU prides itself on a progressive admissions policy and social justice. but on the ground it is being subverted in many ways. OBC reservations were scuttled for 3 years costing 400 students their futures! Now it has become increasingly evident how across centres and categories, viva-voce marks are being used to exclude and discriminate. .
. . ..
OPEN VIOLATION OF AN ORDER OF A CONSTIUTIONAL BENCH .
Admission to JNU based in two components: a written exam and then a viva. JNU allots a weightage of 30% for viva-voce. .
But way back in November 1980, a 5-Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court comprising legal luminaries like .
P.N. Bhagwati, Y.V. Chandrachud (CJI), V.R. Krishnaiyer, Syed Murtaza Fazal Ali, A.D. Koshal) had clearly said. We are of the view that, under the existing circumstances, allocation of more than 15% of the totalmarks for the oral interview would be arbitrary and unreasonable ancJ would be liable to be struck down as constitutionally invalid" .
Why then is the JNU Administration continuing with its blatant illegality? .
WHEN WRITTEN IS REDUCED TO A QUALIFIER, VIVA BECOMES THE REAL 'JUDGE'! .
The idea of having two components to the admission process is BOTH SHOULD HAVE a complementary role in final selection. The problem comes when some people decide that the written is ONLY a qualifying mark and that admission Consequently, we see two kinds of situations in the.
will be determined SOLELY b~sed on performance in the viva. .
admissions data, where students (cutting across categories): .
.
(A) .
Have an average and high performance in the written, but very low marks in the viva. (This pattern is particularly visible for reserved category students.) .
.
(B) .
Show average or less performance in the written, but very high marks in the viva. .
.
.
Clearly, the interview is being used to distribute subjective biases and select or reject candidates based on viva-voce alone. See for yourself how this works! : .
Centre Marks in Written .l\.1arks in Yiva Category .
Student A CHS,SSS 54 8 ST 43 4 ST.
Student B SAS/SIS .
").
Student C SAS SIS 48 I -ST Student D SASISIS 46 1 OBC General ..
Student E csss·sss . 43 6 .
.. '1'. .
General.
Stud.enrF CPS SSS 3-l --3-+ ) ) General.
Student G CPS SSS --G{'neraJ J.
Student H CKS 'SAA 4-1 6 . --.
Regardless of how well you perform in the written exam, the viva alone will decided your entry into the university and your academic fate! .
THE STRANGE CLUSTERING OF MARKS IN THE VIVA .
.... .
A careful study of viva marks shows a strange distribution with marks clustered either between 0-5 or in the 25-30 range. .
.
In the normal course, it is expected that the majority of the students would get average marks between 10-20 with a few.
~ .
very good as well as few very bad performers. Clearly something is very wrong in the way students are being judged in their .
viva, where they are either "very good" or uvery bad". The obvious explanation is that the interview board is using this.
--= .
bimodal marks distribution to select or reject candidates based on viva-voce alone. .
:;l .:. .· .
.
.
.
-.
t71.3, JLJ::) \. ?_ .
t---Join .
.
End the reign of discrimination! With JNU Faculty Fight for Justice and Inclusion! .
G 2 2 21111.
Strike atStructures that Exclude! , .u:! Democratisation and Strike at Rules that Discriminate! .
~ Inclusion in Academics Strike atAdministrative Apathy! .
·. .
.
~ .
Strike at the Rule ofMerit! .
: TClsks Clflq ChClllenges StandfortheJNUoftodayandtomorrow!.
.
:i spea ketS Fight for a Campus Open to All! .
!e p f K. C Indefinite Day 3:5 ro · amal M. heDOV, SIS, JNU Ravi Prakash, Gen SecyJNUSU, Firoz, Joint SecyJNUSU, Om Prasad,! Dr. O.K. lobiVal, President, JNUTA ConvenerSSS, Aardra, CouncilorSSS, Tabrez, CouncilorSL, Sarfaraz,.
= Prot. S.N.Malakar, Sls, JNU Councilor SL, Lenin, Councilor SIS, Anagha, Anand, Arindan, Balje~t,= _ _ Balu, Chintu, Dibya Shikha, lmran, lshan, Jitendra Kumar, Kanhata, ~ Dr. Ar.vlnd Mlshra, SSS, JNU Mahendra, Martand, Nilmani, Nishant, Nitisha, Pavan, Piyush, .
1: Prot. Sona Jharia Minz, SC&SS, JNU Praveen, Priyadarshini,Rohan, Ruchira, Shabbir, Vaibhav .
C: D YS AI SAA JNU Relay Day 3 . . · .c: r. ODe' ' Arvindan, Babita, Charu,Hasan, lrfan, Jagyasem, Javed Wam, Ktshore ~ Dr. Maninder Thakur, SSS, JNU Gaurav, Meenakshi, Meghna, Nagmani, Niloykrittika, Prashant, Raghib, .
= Ratnam, Rukmini, Rukmuddin, Sharath Chandra Bose, Srirupa, Subodh Kunwer, Surya, Ujitra,Uma,Urba, Vldhya,Vina~ Vivek, Waaris .
JNU prides itself on a progressive admissions policy and social justice. but on the ground it is being subverted in many ways. OBC reservations were scuttled for 3 years costing 400 students their futures! Now it has become increasingly evident how across centres and categories, viva-voce marks are being used to exclude and discriminate. .
OPEN VIOLATION OF AN ORDER OF A CONSTIUTIONAL BENCH .
Admission to JNU based in two components: a written exam and then a viva. JNU allots a weightage of 30% for viva-voce. But way back in November 1980, a 5-Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court comprising legal luminaries like .
P.N. Bhagwati, Y.V. Chandrachud (CJI}, V.R. Krishnaiyer, Syed Murtaza Fazal Ali, A.D. Koshal) had clearly said, .
We are of the view that, under the existing circumstances, allocation of more than 15% of the total marks for the oral interview would be arbitrary and unreasonable and would be liable to be struck down as constitutionally invalid" .
Why then is the JNU Administration continuing with its blatant illegality? .
WHEN WRITTEN IS REDUCED TO A QUALIFIER, VIVA BECOMES THE REAL 'JUDGE'! .
The idea of having two components to the admission process is BOTH SHOULD HAVE a complementary role in final selection. The problem comes when some people decide that the written is ONLY a qualifying mark and that admission will be determined SOLELY based on performance in the viva. Consequently, we see two kinds of situations in the admissions data, where students (cutting across categories): .
(A) .
Have an average and 'high performance in the written, but very low marks in the viva. (This pattern is particularly visible for reserved category students.) .
.
(B) .
Show average or less performance in the written, but very high marks in the viva. .
.
.
Clearly, the interview is being used to distribute subjective biases and select or reject candidates based on viva-voce .
alone. See for yourself how this works! : .
Centre Ivlarks in \\"rirten Marks in \ 'i,·a Category Student A CHS,SSS 54 -8 ST Student B SAS,'SIS 43 4 ST .
., !.
Student C SAS/SIS -+8 .t.. ST .
Student D SASIS IS 46 1 OBC .
.
.Stu-dent E csss sss 43 6 General "' .
,-.
Student F cPs ·sss 34 ~.) General .
Student G cps.sss 3·f )') General .
.
·. .
\ Student H CNSSAA -t-l 6 General .
Regardless of haw well you perform in the written exam, the viva alone will decided your entry into the university and your academic fate! .
THE STRANGE CLUSTERING OF MARKS IN THE VIVA .
A careful study of viva marks shows a strange distribution with marks clustered either between 0-5 or in the 25-30 range. In the normal course, it is expected that the majority of the students would get average marks between 10-20 with a few very good as well as few very bad performers. Clearly something is very wrong in the way students are being judged in their viva, where they are either "very good" or "very bad". The obvious explanation is that the interview board is using this bimodal marks distribution to select or reject candidates based on viva-voce alone. P.T.O. .
.
.
M.Phil/~PD/SIS.
?'='? Ms. Jyoti Mankotia Pb.D/ CSRD/SSS II. .
2'39 Damini Keswani Ph.D/ CSDILE/ SIS I 239 ,fl. Sailaja Gullapalli III.
M.PHil/CSRD/SSS.
240 Ishita Sengupta III.
If Ivi.Phi J./CIL/SL -.
.
II.
241 Punam Kumari M.Phi·: /CSMCH/ SSS III.
s.Vijaya I.
242 II Ph.D/CIL/SL .
.
243 Reeta v.
II Ph.D/CSSS/ SSS .
II Ph.D/CSRD/ .SSS.
244 Disha Nawani .
Sharmistha tvlukherjee.
.
II.
245 Ph.D/C.:5RD/SSS III .
246 u Firdousi Naher M.Phil/CSDILE/SIS III .
R.Bindu III.
.
247 If Pb . D/CSSS/SSS.
Manisha Tripathy.
248 " Ph. D/CSRD/ SSS III .
Rehana I.
.
249 fl Ph.D/CIL/SL.
Rupa Si ngh III.
250 II Ph. D/SL.
Man juri Chowdhury III.
II.
251 til .Phil/CHS/SSS .
Jasmine Patnaik I.
.
252 II Ph .. D/CSEES/SIS .
Ni bedita Patnaik I.
.
253 11 Ph.D/CSSS/SSS .
Srijata Sanyal.
254 " Ph. D/ CVJAAS/SIS I .
rr Gauri Ivlohapat ra III.
.
255 H.Phil/CPS/SSS .
El izabeth l~braham.
.
256 " .
Ph.D/CIPOD/SIS I .
Gauri sewak VII.
.
301 fl Ph.D/SLS/.
su t i p a Bisv.ras.
II.
302 Ph. D/SLS IV .
Jaspreet Kaur I.
.
303 II ...--Ll . D/ SES .
304 II N.Banita Devi M.Ph.' l/CIL/SL III .
% Bandana wha VI.
.
305 Ph.D/.SAS/.SIJ.
D.Parimala.
306 " PH. D/CSEAS/SIS I .
Rehana Batul VI.
307 II Ph . D/CBT/.
.
, Ranj an e; Hitra.
308 M.Phil/CIOPD/S,I S III .
" Meena Raghunathan IX.
.
309 Ph. D/CV\AAS/SIS .
Apar~jita Gogoi III.
310 II I-'l .Phil/CLE/SL.
.
Sunita l'1urmu.
II.
311 Ph. D/CESP/SSS VI .
K.Vai jayanti III.
312 II Ph.D/C3EF:S/SI S.
Sac;t2rika Dash I II.
.
313 II Ph. D/CSSS/SSS .
II .
.
swati Hitra.
314 Ph.D/CSEES/SI S VII .
sunain2 Ejharma.
.
II.
315 Ph.D/Phil o/Sl VII .
Raj Vermc=1 .
.
III.
316 II M. Phil/T-ll'ID/SL .
317 II Meena G2utam Ph.D/CBT v .
Smriti Khetar~al.
.
318 II .
-~-----_,..:;.~-.:.__..._..::.., __:;. _.;..:;;.; ---=-~_,;:;;;; _..;;::;. -·-.,__ ....i ,, j.
~-..::..-..._,;::;;. --.....__,;;._ ____,., ------""'" "'-~_...;:.~. ~ ---:::..----""'--=----:=..---=---....=.. .
.
.
' f I .
,... ~-. f .
,. .
I .
A LIST OF RESIDENTS OF GODAVARI HOSTEL UPTO 30.10.2012 .
2012-2013. .
.
1156. ;~t,;;j/}~ 133 ilfts'-L:fi3; / e-Ts 15 c.lit/:0j--; )~ .
, ,:r~:... tjr fJ ~-;;-·.-~· , ' 157 134 fvl·1hiil. /.i·s5/e-f1~ l3 .. (!] 8~)3 .
158 Pranjali I 134 I M.PhjlfSSS/CHS 23.08.12 U.P .
Srivastava .
.
14.10.09 Bihar.
Urvashi Gautam I 135 M.Phil/SSS/CHS.
I 1?9 160 Ritumoni Das 135 I M.Phii/SSS/CMCH SC I 27.08.10 Assam .
I -I 01.06.11 I Assam .
I 161 I Syeda Jolly kazi I 136 I M.Phii/SSS/ZHCES .
. 1 ·1~ ~Br/;5 ' .. .
162 1$on..S...··&uf~136 fY1 /~.Jd,.,j~IT/£/T I .
ST 08.08.12 Rajasthan.
.
1 137 M.A./SSS/CSRD.
163 I Kusum Meena . 1"7 -,rf;_ Io~/2---~gtky-.
..... .:>.
164 OBC 07-10-09 Kerala ...
165 I anjuna M. 138 M.Phii/SSS/CSSS. .
-----·---·-.
12 Manipur.
- 166 1R.S. Philasem 138 IM.Phil/SL/CENG ST IOR .
-.
167 Sonam Singh 139 MA/SAA/SAA sc 03.08.12 U.P. ....:.;-et I.
J'-.
168 Am~rita Singh 139 M.Phil/SSS/ZHCES -02.09.09 U.P .
'.
""'---I .
OBC 22.09.10 Biha r.
169 I Ariba Jalal 140 M.Phil/SIS/ CRCAS .
ST 25.08.08 Manipur.
170 I Seraphina Kamei 1140 I M.Phil/SIS/CAS .
171 I Yimshen Naro 1141 I M.Phil/SL/CRS l ST I 06.08.10 I Nagaland Jamir 172 Pia David 141 M.Phil/SSS/CPS I -I 20.08.09 I U.P. , II .. . 173 ~ -~..P~f'It ~~'\.ll.p 142 M ' Pl....~o/!:'I.SI~l-3 ..51 :~../5/o 11t J..-I LJ. -}{ l~\z"-.
174 I Shayesta Nishat 142 MA./SIS/PIS -20. o1-12-I Assam Ahmed . 175 I Rashmi Giri -1143 I B.A/SL/CRS I OBC I ~ 9.09.12 I U.P .
I ST I 20.09.12 I H.P.
1 176 I Kiran Bala 143 M.Sc/SLS/ SLS .
I -I 21.08.08 I U.P..
.
177 1 Shailka Mi shra 144 M.Phil/SSS/CHS .
r" . .
'.
178 144 I -I ·L, J p.,.. .
~.
.....--IAvlt· v.)Uz-J1l a: 1 r11SC I 5CS /.5'~5' 123-o(,./1 -··-·.
-. .
8 .
.
.
.
~Join .
Public Meetin.
... With JNU Faculty End the reign of discrimination!Fight for Justice and Inclusion!.
Democratisation and Strike atStructures that Exclude! .
tr.ll.t.ltLti!li.
Inclusion in Academics Strikeat Rules thatDiscriminate!.
Strike atAdministrative Apathy!.
.
-· Tasks anet Challenges Strikeatthe Rule ofMerit!.
... ' speakers Stand for theJNU oftoday andtomorrow!.
Fight for a Campus Open toAll!Prot. Kamal M. Chenov, SIS, JNU Indefinite Day 3Dr. O.K. loblval, President, JNUTA Ravi Prakash, Gen Secy JNUSU, Firoz, Joint Secy JNUSU, Om Prasad,.
-Prof. S.N.Malakar, SIS, JNU Convener SSS, Aardra, Councilor SSS, Tabrez, Councilor SL, Sarfaraz,Councilor SL, Lenin, Councilor SIS, Anagha, Anand, Arindan, Baljeet,.
Dr. Arvind Mlshra, SSS, JNU .
Balu, Chintu, Oibya Shikha, lmran, lshan, Jitendra Kumar, Kanhaia,-Prof. Sona Jharla Minz, sc&ss, JNU Mahendra, Martand, Nilmani, Nishant, Nitisha, Pavan, Piyush,Praveen, Priyadarshini, Rohan, Ruchira, Shabbir, VaibhavDr. Y.S. Alone, SAA, JNU Relay Day 3.
Dr. Maninder Thakur, sss, JNU .
Arvindan, Babita, Charu, Hasan, lrfan, Jagyaseni, Javed Wani, Kishore.
Gaurav, Meenakshi, Meghna, Nagmani, Niloykrittika, Prashant, Raghib,.
17 March Tonight Ad Block 9.30pm Ratnam, Rukmini, Rukmuddin, Sharath Chandra Bose, Srirupa,.
Subodh Kunwer, Surya, Ujitra, Uma, Urba, Vidhya, Vinay, Vivek, Waaris.
.
JNU prides itself on a progressive admissions policy and social justice. but on the ground it is being subverted in manyways. OBC reservations were scuttled for 3 years costing 400 students their futures! Now it has become increasingly .
evident how across centres and categories, viva-voce marks are being used to exclude and discriminate..
OPEN VIOLATION OF AN ORDER OF A CONSTIUTIONAL BENCH.
Admission to JNU based in two components: a written exam and then a viva. JNU allots a weightage of 30% for viva-voce. But way back in November 1980, a 5-Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court comprising legal luminaries like .
P.N. Bhagwati, Y.V. Chandrachud (CJI), V.R. Krishnaiyer, Syed Murtaza. Fazal Ali, A.D. Koshal) had clearly said,.
We are of the view that, under the existing circumstances, allocation of more than 15% of the total marksfor the oral interview would be arbitrary and unreasonable and would be liable to be struck down as.
constitutional!y invalid".
Why then is the JNU Administration continuing with its blatant illegality?.
WHEN WRmEN IS REDUCED TO A QUALIFIER, VIVA BECOMES THE REAL 'JUDGE'!.
selection. The problem comes when some people decide that the written .
The idea of having two components to the admission process is BOTH SHOULD HAVE a complementary role in final.
-.
i~ ONLY a qualifying mark and that admission.
wilt be determined SOLELY based on performance in the viva. Consequently, we see two kinds of situations in the.
.
admissions data, where students (cutting across categories):.
(A) Have an average and high performance in the written, but very low marks in the viva. (This pattern is particularlyvisible for reserved category students.).
(B) Show average or less performance in the written, but very high marks in the viva. ·.
Clearly, the interview is being used to distribute subjective biases and select or reject candidates based on viva-voce.
.
alone. See for yourself how this works! .
Centre tv!arks in \Vritten.
Student A CHS/SSS Nlarks in v\ya Category.
54.
Stude-ntB 8.
SAS'SIS 43 ST.
Student C 4.
SAS 'SIS ST.
48 ').
Student D SAS,SIS 46 .!.. ST.
__Stu-dent E CSSS 'SSS 13 1 OBC i .
.
Student F CPS SSS ._,..., 4 6 General .. ~· \ Student G cps·sss 3-l 2') 5 ') G~neral L-Student H C~SSAA -l-l 6--GeneralRegardless of how well you perform in the written exam, the viva alone will decided your entry into the .
General.
university and your academic fate!.
THE STRANGE CLUSTERING OF MARKS IN THE VIVA.
Acareful study of viva marks shows a strange distribution with marks clustered either between 0-5 or in the 25-30 range. .
In the normal course, it is expected that the majority of the students would get average marks between 10-20 with a few .
very good aswell asfew very bad performers. Clearly something is very wrong in the way students are being judged in their .
.
viva, where they are either "very good" or "very bad". The obvious explanation is that the interview board is using this l.
bimodal marks distribution to select or reject candidates based on viva-voce alone. .
..
.
P.T.O. .
.
.
-.. \""~ ~ .
··BOYS ,, .
~ .
.
~----.
Center/School/Course Category Year of.
R. No Name .
Admit ion NEELU SINGH SES/M .PHIL sc 2011.
201. .
.
NAIR SMITHA SHASHI CSMCH/555/M.PHIL 2008 .
.
202. .
REHNAMOL P.R SEAS/515/M.PHIL sc 2011 -.
.
.
MAHIMA KOHLI . SL/CGS/M.A 2013 .
203. SANCHITA KHURANA SAA/SAA/M .PHIL 2012 ,. ..--· .
-.
SHIVANI KAUL SAA/SAA/M .A FN 2012 .
204. .
ISHA TIRKEY 555/SPS/M .PHIL ST 2012 .
KEKA OAS SSS/CH5/M.PHIC 2012 .
.
.
205. .
SRISHTY CR5/SL/B.A 2010 .
KOMAL PANDE SAA/M .PHIL 2013 .
.
.
206. .
NIKITA AUDICHYA CLG/M.PHIL, 2012 .
RITU SOM SBT/PH.D I 2012 .
.
.
207. .
AMRITA KUMAR! CAFS/5IS/M . PH I L 2011 .
.
.
MAITREYEE MANDAL CES/SL/M.PHil sc 2009 -.
208. 5AGORIKA SINGHA SAA/SAA/M.PHIL OBC 2012 .
KANKANA TALULDAR CLG/M.PHIL 2012.
.
- .
210. .
AASTHA AGGARWAL SSS/CESP/M.A ·2012 .
PRIYA SHARMA SSS/CPS/M.A 2012 .
.
.
211. .
SURBHI GAUR CSRD/5SS/M.PH.D 2012 .
5HAMBHAVI 5L/CFFS/B.A2ND 2012 .
.
.
212. .
PREETI SINGH SL/CEN G /M.PHI L 2012 .
.
.
-.
SHIKHA SWAROOP SL/CJS/B.A . 2012 .
213. NUPOOR RANA CS5S/S5S/M.A 2012 .
NUTAN MARIAN 5SS/CSSS/M.PHIL ST 2012 .
TIGGA .
.
-.
214. .
GULSHABBU SL/CIL/M.PHIL OBC 2012 .
RIMPI BORAH CPS/SS5/M .A OBC 2012 .
.
.
215. .
SUNITA MEENA SIS/RCAS/M.PHIL ST 2012.
.
.
-.
..
POOJA JAIF SL/CFFS/B.A 2No YR ST 2012 .
216. KIMROSE VAIPHEI CFFS/SLL&CS/B.A ST 2010 .
ISHANI DEY SAA/M .PHIL 2013 .
.
.. .
Date of Allotment 29/08/11 19/09/08 05/09/11 16/08/13 22/08/12 21/08/12 31/07/ 12 06/09/12 09/02/11 19/08/13 22/08/12 .
22/08/12 .
26/08/11 .
20/08/09 .
.
24/08/12 .
11/10/12 .
.
11/ 10/12 .
06/09/12 .
.
27/08/12 05/09/12 08/08/12 18/01/13 .
04/12/12 .
14/08/12 .
.
18/ 10/12 07/11/12 27/08/12 28/08/12 05/08/10 12/08/13 .
Completion of Course 2017 .
2014 .
2017 .
2015 .
2018 . .
2014 .
2018 .
2018 .
2015 .
2019 .
2018 .
2016 .
2017 .
2015 .
2018 .
.
2018 .
.
2014 .
.
2014 .
.
2016 .
2017 .
2018 .
2017 .
.
2014 .
.
2018 .
.
-.
2018 .
2014 .
2018 .
2016 .
2015 .
2019 .
.
: .
J .
= .
= .
-.
= .
.
[ .
.
[ .
,[ .
I[ .
.
][ .
][ .
.
]I .
.
~ .
.
I .
~ .
-.
-.
.
'2 .
... .
.
= .
.
.
.
.