View allAll Photos Tagged comparison
Length comparisons for my dals wearing 7-8" wigs. All are stretched to fit the dal head. I am not using velcro or glue to attach onto their heads.
I originally bought the 7-8" wigs because there were a few styles only availabe in that size that I liked and I wanted for dal. I figured if they didn't fit, I could always get a BJD! (haha...yeah....)
Anyway, I wouldn't recommend 7-8" for all but for some it does work. ^^; In the end it comes down to your own preference if you're okay stretching the wig out and trying to get it fit. It doesn't fit exactly like the photos but it doesn't look bad either.
Comparing electricity strategies online is a wise move that several enlightened customers are making. Aussie bill compare provides internet contrast devices that are understandable, easy to make use of and one that assists you contrast electricity strategies. Aussie bill compare will certainly employ and carry out cutting edge technology, tools and human touch to continue servicing in their quest to save power, save money and save the planet. Electricity Comparison Victoria is most comprehensive electricity comparison tool for you to contrast, switch and conserve.Visit our site www.aussiebillcompare.com/electricity-comparison-victoria for more information on Electricity Comparison Victoria
Comparison Kodak Gold 200. I shot one roll of Kodak Gold 200 and one roll of Ultramax 400, too. That was rather for comparison. I didn't do a lot to those. The yellow of the flower was possibly a little too much for the film ...
the bunny in the middle is from the "Cozy Cottage" set I got at Toys R Us. the other two are from eBay seller SinoDolls. the CC version has different trim on her dress, and the collar is a velveteen sort of fabric & unhemmed, where the collar on the dresses of the other two is lightweight cotton & has a turned hem. the buttons seem to be slightly diffferent between the two versions, but in rather minor ways. overall the CC version seems to have a lighter body colour & her dress is a brighter, more orangey shade of red.
My main Flickr photo host site is at www.flickr.com/photos/robert-stalnaker/
This Flickr site is strictly for educational purposes, eBird documentation, ID quizes, ID help, etc.
Please visit my main Flickr site for my very best nature photography.
Re subspecies ... greater Orlando is in the range of Buteo l. alleni. Compare the head coloration to the RSHA posted by Joseph Morlan taken in the range of Buteo l. extimus. The hawk on the left here has fresher feathers (and thus lighter color). Note the worn tail feathers on the hawk on the right.
Iso comparison of the new Nikon D90. 200 thru 6400
Iso comparison of the new Nikon D90. 200 thru 6400
You have to get up pretty early in the morning to put one over on the savvy produce shopper. Contax IIIa, 50/1.5 Sonnar, Fomapan 100 in PC-TEA.
Though it's rather large as a car, the Dodge Charger SRT looks like a freakin' truck next to the Diablo! The Diablo's powerful V12 and lighter weight would make it seem about as fast as a truck, too.
Hasbro - Star Wars the Mandalorian & Grogu Comparison
Left: Retro
Center: Epic Hero Series
Right: Vintage Collection
One of the AMPs (Big Rad Wolf) joins a gang of minifigures from some other popular series! For more information regarding the AMP toyline please visit the AMP facebook page here! --> www.facebook.com/AmusingMiniParanormals?ref=hl&ref_ty...
Comparison of the (single coated) Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 with the (multicoated) Nikon Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8. Both have the same optical formula, only the coating is different. HN-3 hood, no filter, Nikon D90 body.
ISO comparison between ISO 6400 and ISO 3200. I find the noise for ISO 3200 usable and improves with noise ninja, but even the ISO 6400 is pretty impressive! Definitely printable on 4x6, and I will attempt to print a A3/A4 ISO 6400 shot soon.
Link to Original Size here
Printed with 0.6 mm nozzle. Compared to the PLA version (which was printed with 0.4 mm nozzle, same layer height)
See also video:
#3DBenchy
Photos (NOT handheld shots) for comparison of the Nikkor 80-400 VR to the 70-200VR with and without the TC-20EII teleconverter. I have uploaded original full size photos for various focal lengths and apertures of each lens, along with two different crops of each photo.
All photos are unedited other than cropping.
The lens, focal length, and aperture data for each photo are given in the filenames.
All photos were taken with a Nikon D200 sitting on a stable piano bench approximately 8 feet from the feather, which was taped to a wall and sticking out horizontally into the air at about the same level as the camera, and roughly perpendicular to the camera's line of sight.
Auto focus was used to focus on the middle of the narrow blue stripe just to the left (in these photos) of the dark eye.
ISO was 100.
VR was off.
Mirror lockup and the default mirror lockup timed shutter release were used to prevent camera shake.
Illumination was from an SB800 flash mounted on the camera in TTL mode.
Spot metering was used.
I got asked for a comparison of the Haircolors of my rerooted Siernna Calm and Honey Swamp.
Cause the Color Me Creepy Doll has the same Color just in straight i put her into the Picture too.
For Siernna i used on top and in the Front the Color "Mermaid" from Retrodolls (Seaglow from Mylittlecustoms).
This is just a Blend of Kingfisher Blue and Clover.
So i used the Colors in the Back each in a row. That gave them a streaked look but still blends in well.
I absolutly don´t know any Store where i can get the Haircolor Honey Swamp has.
I really want a Emerald Green
in Saran. Ivy from Dollyhair is pretty but i hate Nylon.
So this is the best next thing. ^^
I was quite curious to see how my three DSLRs compared when dealing with long exposure noise (aka thermal noise). This is not meant to be "scientific". More just a basic comparison.
All images where taken at ISO 1600. And images where taken at room temperature. And i rotated between each camera, so there was time for cool down between 120s shot and 300s shot.
The exact same settings were used in DPP for Raw conversion. White Balance was done using a 1s dark frame custom WB. This can make the photo look green.
Each row is 1s, 120s, and 300s top to bottom. Each column is the 1D Mark III, 50D, and 5D Mark II left to right.
It seems that at 120s the 50D and 5D2 both handle things quite fine, but at 300s the 5D2 goes on its head, with the 1D3 having much better control among the three.
Also the 1D3 seems to have less banding noise, with the 5D2 having banding both ways!
SO basically what camera i should use depends on how dark the subject is, and how long an exposure I can take before I get tracking problems.
While the both the 50D and 5D2 have smaller pixels, if i have to super pixel the images to reduce noise, i do loose resolution over the 1D Mark III with its 7.2 um pixels.
Definitely I'm going to try doing some shooting on the field with all three cameras to see if it really does make a big difference. But these results are interesting to say the least