View allAll Photos Tagged analysis
Jack, on the Beach
Shih Tzu
History
DNA analysis placed the ancestors of today's Shih Tzu breed in the group of "ancient" breeds indicating "close genetic relationship to wolves".[7] Ludvic von Schulmuth studied the skeletal remains of dogs found in human settlements as long as ten thousand years ago. Von Schulmuth created a genealogical tree of Tibetan dogs that shows the "Gobi Desert Kitchen Midden Dog", a scavenger, evolved into the "Small Soft-Coated Drop-Eared Hunting Dog who would fight lions in packs " which evolved into the Tibetan Spaniel, Pekingese, and Japanese Chin. Another branch coming down from the "Kitchen Midden Dog" gave rise to the Papillon and Long-haired Chihuahua and yet another "Kitchen Midden Dog" branch to the Pug and Shih Tzu. The Shih Tzu was almost completely wiped out during the Chinese Revolution. Seven males and seven females were saved, and today, all shih tzus can be traced back to one of these dogs.[8]
There are various theories of the origins of today's breed. Theories relate that it stemmed from a cross between Pekingese and a Tibetan dog called the Lhasa Apso; that the Chinese court received a pair as a gift during the Tang Dynasty (618 – 907 AD); and that they were introduced from Tibet to China in the mid-18th century (Qing Dynasty.[9] Dogs during that time were selectively bred and seen in Chinese paintings. The first dogs of the breed were imported into Europe (England and Norway) in 1930, and were classified by the Kennel Club as "Apsos".[9] The first European standard for the breed was written in England in 1935 by the Shih Tzu Club,[10] and the dogs were recategorised as Shih Tzu. The breed spread throughout Europe, and was brought to the United States after World War II, when returning members of the US military brought back dogs from Europe. The Shih Tzu was recognised by the American Kennel Club in 1969 in the Toy Group.[9] The breed is now recognised by all of the major kennel clubs in the English-speaking world.[citation needed] It is also recognised by the Fédération Cynologique Internationale for international competition in Companion and Toy Dog Group, Section 5, Tibetan breeds.[5]
This isn't actually Gal Gadot.
What? Really? You were pretty sure about that to begin with?
The Mezco One:12 line is a relatively new toy line, popping up in recent years as a response to the various 1/6 figure companies becoming more and more expensive. Most of them retail for $80 USD, though of course there are probably come con exception.
Now, through the years I've read reviews of various figures, but never bought any due to the fact none of the characters were particularly appealing to me, and I had missed the Armoured Batman from the BvS movie.
I had ALMOST actually bought Wonder Woman here over Christmas during the Boxing Week sale at the Silver Snail, but held out, thinking that my $100 + tax would be better used towards what I thought was going my inaugural analysis, Hela, which still hasn't materialized yet.
Mezco, as far as I'm aware, is an American company. I don't typically purchase American toys, with the exception of Transformers, so I had no idea what to expect, though I know enough that in general that my expectations should be tempered as compared to Figma, Figuarts, or even the Storm Collectibles stuff.
At any rate, enough preamble - lets get on with the show. As this is my first One:12 product, I'm going to be whining about everything.
So the exterior box is shipped protected by various plastic tags and sheets to protect against scratching. The actual packaging itself was fairly functional, consisting of an inner windowed box with a slip cover. Graphics are clean and bright, though somewhat simplistic compared to the Hot Toys, Medicom, hell even the Figuarts and Figma boxes, though that glossy image of what I think is the Mezco logo is quite nice.
Actual cardboard is pretty average quality, being fairly lightweight with a natural matte finish. I understand that the convention exclusives and other more uncommon figures come in a metal tin, which reminds me very much of those metal tins you get Mooncakes in.
The actual contents of the box are mostly spelled out on the back of the box: the figure, an alternative head, four additional hands, coiled and uncoiled lasso, her Godkiller Sword, her shield, a base with arm for dynamic posing, as well as a Figma styled plastic bag for holding the various loose goodies in.
Actual cardboard is pretty average quality, being fairly lightweight with a natural matte finish. I understand that the convention exclusives and other more uncommon figures come in a metal tin, which reminds me very much of those metal tins you get Mooncakes in.
The actual contents of the box are mostly spelled out on the back of the box: the figure, an alternative head, four additional hands, coiled and uncoiled lasso, her Godkiller Sword, her shield, a base with arm for dynamic posing, as well as a Figma styled plastic bag for holding the various loose goodies in.
The figure is, as one would guess, a 1/12 figure, putting it roughly 6 inches high. The only other competition the Mezco figure has is that Mafex BvS Wonder Woman that I picked up last year. I'll make this as painless as possible - with the exception of one factor, albeit a very important one, the Mezco destroys the Mafex I own.
Off the bat, I'd like to note that with the exception of the very fine detailing on her face and maybe some smaller metallic features, the overall paint work is actually pretty good. No areas where overspray caused me to gawk, nor was there any areas with obviously poor masking or line work, though I will admit that the lines on her bracers come awfully close. Her skin tone is a bit on the bronze side, which can make photographing her using yellow lighting challenging.
It goes without saying that the work here is significantly better than that of your Marvel Legends figures, and probably even the Black series stuff. Of course, these do cost almost 4 times as much.
Her sword is seems about the right length and girth, but the shield is definitely smaller than what the prototype picture on the box itself shows.
Grasping hands were all of a soft rubber which is easily malleable, allowing for easy manipulation to hold the sword without fear of constant breakage. Fingers look kind of muddled on these hands, and there are concerns on my mind about overall longevity of painted rubber parts (i.e. the split head on my Microman Chun Li) but only time will actually address that.
One of the key selling points of the One:12 line are the tailored outfits that the characters wear. Wonder Woman, unfortunately, really only has fabric skirt, and as such, much like the Hot Toys version, her armour is a moulded and painted piece of plastic.
The bracers and her leather strap are separate pieces, which is nice. I couldn't find any instructions included with my figure, so I'm guessing they never made a way for you to actually strap the shield and her sword to her back.
Her lassos are functional, though to be honest i didn't play around with the uncoiled one at all.
The box proclaims over 30 points of articulation. I didn't bother counting them because my point is this - it certainly didn't feel like there were that many. Her outfit effectively removes the waist as a point of articulation, nor are there any any ab crunch options. Shoulders do not collapse, which basically makes doing the cross armed pose impossible. Legs can at most be raised 90 degrees from a vertical position thus making kneeling poses with the figure very unnatural looking. Similarly, crossing her legs isn't happening either, making more stylish or elegant poses very hard to pull off. Thigh swivel joints are quite unsightly.
Now that I think about it, the elbows didn't bend more than 90 degrees either.
All in all, the various other high end 1/12 ish Wonder Woman figures offer better articulation than this one. I'm hoping this body is not the base one used for their various figures, but rather like the Hot Toys seamless body, one they developed specifically for Wonder Woman. But looking at preview pictures for all of the other One:12, articulation may be limited like this for all of their product.
While we're on the subject, if this is a custom body, then Mezco needs to improve the silhouette a bit, and really improve their game on the muscle tone, particularly on the arms and her back.
We now come to one of the greatest points of controversy for this figure, the face/head. From what I have read, release of this figure was significantly delayed due to Mezco fiddling with the heads, and many accounts I read said the final product was a marked improvement over the prototypes. Some even claim that the sculpt looks exactly like Gal Gadot.
Hence "This is not actually Gal Gadot".
No matter which way I stare at it, I honestly don't see any aspect of her at all in any of these, and still stick with my original analysis of "she looks like Olivia Munn".
Another hot topic is "why the hell does she look like she has chipmunk cheeks?". Several factors.
First off, to my eye, the base of the back of the neck for the default head sculpt is way too thick, and as such, this serves to widen her already problematic face. To my eye, the back of the neck on the alternate sculpt (one where she has no bangs) is slimmer in this area which helps to given a more streamline look.
Secondly, the sculptors really didn't emphasize her cheek bones that well. It's there, but you really need to have the light shining the right way for them to appear. Because these cheek bones are not emphasized, her jaw looks like a continuation of a blob that starts from her forehead. I also feel a dash of contouring paint apps would have helped with this issue, and allowed for easier photographs.
Sculpting of the hair is pretty good, but I think they missed an opportunity to have one sculpt feature a head of hair that is blowing sideways as opposed to having one that is all behind her head.
So that was my first foray into the One:12 line. A bit of a mixed bag, with my real disappointment being the surprisingly limited articulation, particularly given what Figma, Figuarts, and Mafex figures can do at a slightly smaller size. I'm going to wait for Hela to tell me how good their tailored costumes are, and hopefully see why people are highly excited about these products.
Asbestos in non-friable form, such as asbestos-cement shingles, roofing, and board, is generally considered safe.
I'm guessing about the authors of these three pieces of graffiti written on a ventilation shaft of the MTR at Kowloon Tong station: there were three teenage, female, native English speakers, who shared the same felt tip pen while waiting for a bus. One or more was smoking a cigarette (because it's hidden from street view). The thoughts are interesting/sensitive, but they didn't finish one of them because their bus had arrived. I note the same mistake of a dotted "i" while the rest of the letters are capitalized. However, the mistake was probably made by different authors suggesting they are in the same class at school, and were taught the same mistake/were not corrected. The writing is delicate, suggesting the authors were female, but the "quiet hope" sentence was written with a heavier hand, suggesting either confidence or possibly a male author. There is some inconsistency about the dots at the end of each sentence, with most placing three, one four and one five.
The Thing from Another World 1951
Watch the skies, everywhere! Keep looking. Keep watching the skies!
—Ned “Scotty” Scott
www.youtube.com/v/T5xcVxkTZzM Trailer
This is one of the major classics of 50s sci fi movies. Released in April of 1951, it was the first full-length film to feature a flying saucer from outer space, which carried a hostile alien. The budget and the effects are typical B-grade stuff, but the acting and pacing are well above the usual B levels. Kenneth Toby and Margaret Sheriden star. James Arness (more known for his westerns) plays The Thing.
Howard Hawks' early foray into the science fiction genre took advantage of the anti-communist feelings of the time to help enhance the horror elements of the story. McCarthyism and the Korean War added fuel to the notion of Americans stalked by a force which was single of mind and "devoid of morality." But in the end, it is American soldiers and scientists who triumph over the evil force - or the monster in the case of this film. Even today, this is considered one of the best of the genre.
Film review by Jeff Flugel. June 2013
There's not a lot new or particularly insightful I can offer when it comes to discussing the seminal sci-fi flick, The Thing from Another World that hasn't been written about ad naseum elsewhere. One of the most famous and influential of all 1950s creature features, it kicked off more than a decade of alien invasion and bug-eyed monster movie mayhem, inspired a host of future filmmakers (one of whom, John Carpenter, would go on to direct his own version of the story in 1982), and remains one of the best-written and engaging films of its kind.
Loosely (and I do mean loosely) adapted from John W. Campbell's novella, "Who Goes There?," The Thing is legendary director Howard Hawks' lone foray into the science fiction/ horror genres, but it fits comfortably into his filmography, featuring as it does Hawks' favorite themes: a group of tough professionals doing their job with ease, good-humored banter and practiced finesse; a bit of romance with a gutsy dame who can easily hold her own with the boys; and lots of overlapping, razor-sharp dialogue. Featuring a script by Charles Lederer and an uncredited Ben Hecht, The Thing is easily the most spryly written and funniest of all 50s monster movies. In fact, it's this sharpness in the scripting, and the extremely likeable ensemble cast of characters, rather than the now-familiar story and somewhat unimaginative monster design, that makes the film still feel fresh and modern to this day.
There's likely few people out there reading this who don't know the story of The Thing like the back of their hand, but here goes...When an unidentified aircraft crashes close to a remote research station near the North Pole, Captain Pat Hendry (Kenneth Tobey, in the role of his career) and his squad are dispatched there to investigate. Dr. Carrington (Robert Cornthwaite) heads the scientific contingent there, and he informs Hendry that he thinks the downed craft is possibly "not of this earth." A joint team of soldiers and scientists head out to the crash site and find an actual, honest-to-goodness flying saucer lying buried under the ice.
The spaceship is destroyed while the men try to melt the ice around it with thermite bombs, but they find a lone, 8-foot-tall extraterrestrial occupant frozen nearby and bring the body back to the outpost in a block of ice. Dr. Carrington and his crew of eggheads want to study the thing, but Hendry is adamant that it should be kept as is until he gets word from his superior in Anchorage, General Fogerty. It wouldn't be a monster movie without something going pear-shaped, of course, and before you know it, a careless mistake results in the creature being thawed out of his iceberg coffin and going on a bit of a rampage, taking out a number of sled dogs and a few unsuspecting scientists along the way. The rest of the film details the tense battle between the surviving humans and the coldly intelligent, remorseless alien invader, which seems virtually unkillable, impregnable to cold, bullets and fire...
The set-up for the film, and how everything eventually plays out, might seem overly familiarly nowadays, but in 1951, this was cutting-edge stuff, at least in cinemas. The Thing plays as a veritable blueprint of how to make a compelling "alien monster-on-the-loose" movie. Howard Hawks not being particularly well-versed, or even interested in, science fiction per se likely worked to its benefit, as he ended up making, as he so often did in his other films, what is first-and-foremost a well-oiled entertainment, rather than simply a genre exercise.
Typical of a Hawks film, The Thing is meticulously designed, composed and shot, but in such a way as to appear offhand. Hawks almost never went in for showy camera angles or flashy effects. His technique was nearly invisible; he just got on with telling the story, in the most straightforward, unfussy way. But this easy, seemingly effortless style was very carefully considered, by a shrewd and knowing mind. As Bill Warren, author of one of the best (and certainly most encyclopedic) books about 1950s sci-fi filmmaking, Keep Watching the Skies, notes in his detailed analysis of the film:
As most good movies do, The Thing works in two areas: sight and sound. The locale is a cramped, tunnel-like base; the men are confined within, the Thing can move freely outdoors in the cold. Compositions are often crowded, with more people in the shot than seems comfortable, reinforcing the idea of confinement After the Thing escapes, only the alien itself is seen standing and moving alone.
This feeling of a cold, hostile environment outside the base is constantly reinforced throughout the film, and a real tension mounts when, towards the climax, the highly intelligent Thing, itself immune to the subzero arctic conditions, turns off the compound's heating, knowing the humans inside will quickly die without it. (The freaky, otherworldly theremin-flavored music by Dimitri Tiomkin adds a lot to the eerie atmosphere here.)
As groundbreaking and well-structured as the plot of The Thing was (and is), what makes the film play so well today is the great script and the interaction of a bunch of seasoned character actors, who toss off both exposition and pithy bon mots in such a low-key, believable manner. This is a truly ensemble movie, and the fact that it doesn't feature any big name stars really adds to the overall effect; no one really hogs all the limelight or gets the lion's share of good lines. Hawks was a director who usually worked with the biggest names in the business, but, much as in the earlier Air Force, he was equally at home working with a cast of rock-solid character actors.
All this talk of Howard Hawks as director, when it's actually Christian Nyby who is credited with the job, has long been a source of speculation with fans of the film. Todd McCarthy, in his bio Howard Hawks: The Grey Fox of Hollywood, seems to clear the issue up once and for all (though really, after viewing enough Hawks films, the results speak for themselves):
The perennial question surrounding The Thing From Another World has always been, Who actually directed it, Christian Nyby or Howard Hawks? The sum of participants' responses make the answer quite clear. Putting it most bluntly, (associate producer) Ed Lasker said "Chris Nyby didn't direct a thing. One day Howard was late and Chris said,'Why don't we get started? I know what the shot should be.' And I said, 'No, Chris, I think we'll wait until Howard gets here." Ken Tobey testified, "Chris Nyby directed one scene. Howard Hawks was there, but he let Chris direct one scene. We all rushed into a room, eight or ten of us, and we practically knocked each other over. No one knew what to do." Dewey Martin, Robert Cornthwaite and Richard Keinen all agreed that Hawks was the director, and Bill Self said, "Chris Nyby was a very nice, decent fellow, but he wasn't Howard Hawks."
Nyby had been Hawks' editor on a number of films, and Hawks apparently decided to help his collaborator establish a name for himself by allowing him directorial credit on the film. This seemingly altruistic gesture didn't mean that Hawks wasn't involved in virtually every aspect of the making of the film, however, and ultimately, The Thing did little for Nyby's directing career, at least on the big screen (he did go on to a long and busy career directing for numerous television programs, however.)
Bill Self was told at the time that Hawks didn't take directing credit on The Thing because it was planned as a low-budget film, one in which RKO didn't have much confidence. But, as critics have been saying ever since it was released, The Thing is a Howard Hawks film in everything but name. The opening scene of various members of the team bantering is so distilled as to be a virtual parody of Hawksian overlapping dialogue. Even more than Only Angels Have Wings, the picture presents a pristine example of a group operating resourcefully in a hermetically sealed environment in which everything in the outside world represents a grave threat. (3)
In addition to all the masculine camaraderie and spooky goings-on, one of the best aspects of The Thing is the fun, charming little tease of a romance between Capt. Hendry and Nikki (top-billed Margaret Sheridan). Nikki works as Prof. Carrington's assistant and is not merely the requisite "babe" in the film. True to the Hawksian norm, she's no pushover when it comes to trading insults with the men, nor a shrinking violet when up to her neck in perilous situations. Unlike most actresses in 50s monster movies, she doesn't utter a single scream in The Thing
and in fact, it's her practical suggestion which gives Bob, Hendry's ever-resourceful crew chief (Dewey Martin), the notion of how to finally kill the monster. Lederer and Hecht's screenplay hints at the backstory to Nikki and Pat's relationship in humorous and oblique ways, and their flirtation amidst all the chaos adds sparkle to the film but never gets in the way of the pace of the story. One nice little throwaway exchange near the finale encapsulates their verbal give-and-take, as Nikki playfully pokes the temporarily-befuddled Hendry, as his men scurry about, setting Bob's plan in motion.
Nikki: Looks as if the situation's well in hand.
Hendry: I've given all the orders I'm gonna give.
Nikki: If I thought that were true, I'd ask you to marry me.
Sheridan, a former model signed to a 5-year contract by Hawks, is quite good here, but after The Thing her career never really caught fire and she retired from acting a few years later. The closest thing to a star turn in the film is Kenneth Tobey as Capt. Hendry. Tobey racked up an impressive number of credits throughout his nearly 50-year-long career, generally as gruff, competent military men or similar types, and he was always good value, though it's as Capt. Hendry in The Thing that he truly shines. He consistently humanizes the no-nonsense, take charge man of action Hendry by displaying an easygoing approach to command. Most of Hendry's men call him by his first name, and delight in ribbing him about his budding romance with Nikki, and he responds to all this joshing in kind. When things get hairy, Tobey's Hendry doesn't have to bark his orders; it's clear that, despite the friendly banter, his men hold him in high esteem and leap to do his bidding at a moment's notice.
Many of the other members of the cast, while none of them ever became household names, will likely be recognizable from countless other roles in both film and television. Hawks gave Dewey Martin co-star billing in The Big Sky a few years later. Robert Cornthwaite kept busy for decades on stage and television, as well as in supporting roles in films such as Monkey Business, Kiss Me Deadly and Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? John Dierkes (Dr. Chapman) and Douglas Spencer (Scotty) both had juicy roles in the western classic Shane, as well as many other movies too numerous to name. Sharp-eyed viewers will also recognize Eduard Franz, Paul Frees (he of the famous voice) and Groucho Marx's right-hand man on You Bet Your Life, George Fenneman, in pivotal roles. And of course we mustn't forget 6' 7" James Arness (years before becoming renowned as Marshall Matt Dillon on Gunsmoke) as the hulking Thing.
A quick note on the "remake": John Carpenter's The Thing (1982), a bleak, grisly and brilliant take on the story, was a box-office dud when first released, but has since attained well-deserved status as a modern classic. While most fans seem divided into two camps - those who love the more restrained, old-fashioned thrills of the original, and those who prefer the more visceral, paranoiac Carpenter version - I happen to treasure both films equally and revisit each of them often. The Carpenter version is by far the gutsier, unsettling one, emphasizing as it does the "trust no one," shape-shifting "the alien is one of us" scenario imagined by John W. Campbell, but the Hawks' film is the most fun, with a far more likeable array of characters, working together to defeat an implacable menace. Each has its own clear merits. I wouldn't want to do without either film, and frankly see no need to choose one over the other.
"Every one of you listening to my voice...tell the world. Tell this to everybody, wherever they are: Watch the skies. Everywhere. Keep looking. Keep watching the skies.”
Acting Credits
Margaret Sheridan - Nikki Nicholson
Kenneth Tobey - Captain Patrick Hendrey
Robert Cornthwaite - Professor Carrington
Dewey Martin - Crew Chief
Douglas Spencer - Ned "Scotty" Scott
Eduard Franz - Dr Stern
Robert Nichols - Lieutenant Ken Erickson
William Self - Colonel Barnes
Sally Creighton - Mrs Chapman
John Dierkes - Dr. Chapman
James R. Young - Lieutenant Eddie Dykes
Norbert Schiller - Dr. Laurenz
William Neff - Olson
Allan Ray - Officer
Lee Tung Foo - Cook
Edmund Breon - Dr. Ambrose
George Fenneman - Dr. Redding
Tom Steele - Stuntman
James Arness - The Thing
Billy Curtis - The Thing While Shrinking
35 research participants and 1.5 hour interview for each leads to a lot of stuff to analyze. We've really gone crazy with the stickies since this photo was taken last week. I'll post a version of the current space as soon as I stitch together the photos I just took.
before looking at others with judgement you must first judge yourself.
Big thanks to MONDO RODRIGUEZ for helping me out with this shot !
enjoy :]
Analysis of iron in water from Pacific surface region by the Flow Injection analysis in the Chemistry Lab.
Archaeologist and author Steven Dp Richardson inspects a section of collapsed rampart at Dundurn hill fort, St. FIllans, Perthshire, GB (30.12.25). www.socantscot.org/uncategorized/dundurn-dendrochronologi...
Analysis of iron in water from Pacific surface region by the Flow Injection analysis in the Chemistry Lab.
Analysis of iron in water from Pacific surface region by the Flow Injection analysis in the Chemistry Lab.
A finely-constructed small glass Schrotter reaction vessel [1890s] in front of the laboratory procedure for analysis of carbonic acid in limestone, from Outlines of Quantitative Analysis by A.Humboldt Sexton 1903 .
A textbook for laboratory use and for students undertaking degrees, diplomas or advanced certificates in Science or Chemistry.
Published by Charles Griffin& Co., London. Brown cloth boards, 178 pages 20cm x 13.5cm.
Carbonic acid is a weak acid formed when carbon dioxide gas is dissolved in water with formula H2CO3.
Urdu Forex Guide, Forex Guide, فاریکس ٹریڈنگ اردو میں سیکھیں | Best Broker of Asia, To trade the Forex market effectively, you need the right guidance and resources, that's where www.fxTrain.info can help. 5 days a week online forex (4x, FX) currency and spot metals trading, spreads as low as 1-3 pip, trading from charts, and live support, Here you will find information on a cross between the British pound and the US dollar, Currency trading on the international financial Forex market. Forex Trading News, Forex Rates, Forex Education, Economic Calendar, Trader contests, Forex analysis and Forex TV, LEARN FOREX IN URDU
As a computer tries to analyze this football play, the superimposed boxes show where the computer thinks the players are at the moment – and usually it’s right. This type of analysis is helping to develop artificial intelligence systems that can see, learn from and eventually improve complex operations. (Graphic courtesy of Oregon State University)
Of course I know where the Batcave is. I've been around him long enough that we have a sort of thing between us. Right now though I'm looking at this flower he has on display which I did NOT give him. Don't think I can't see Robin's smirk as he watches my reaction. Jealous? Never. But if I lay my hands on whoever... Oh, the computer just dinged. Let's see what was so special about this Venom.
(This series is a continuation from the Penthouse Invasion series: www.flickr.com/photos/baricade/7100916439/in/photostream)
Save on Evolutionary Analysis Saving, Order Now! Want it delivered within 1 day? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout.Evolutionary Analysis See More Detail at this Link: Read Full Detail | Compare
Evolutionary Analysis
I've written a software that analysis the movement of the seesaw.
white: data from acceleromenter
red: fourier-transformed data from accelerometer
vertical light grey bars: extremes
green: intensity of movement
grey: beats per minute
light blue: regularity of the movement
blue: endurance
Please note: all data will be available as OSC messages on a local WIFI network at dockville festival. The art-exhibtion of Dockville opens on 2nd August. I will be at the festival area the following week. If you want to make some sound/music based on BumTschack Wippe please come by!
i think Angel in A-Team is the guy in a pink suit ("You," probably) in Bad Habits.
They are addicted.
They chase a high.
They are observers.
When Ed meets them he disappears into thin air (after he purchases the magazine, "The Big Issue" and after his car crash).
They have thick eye makeup, as they should.
They split off from themselves (In the morning, Angel watches Angel die, Mr Pink dissolves to reveal Ed)
They can fly (Mr. Pink clearly can and, If that isn't the meaning of the repeated lyric"Angle to Fly," at least Angel flies away at the end)
They are girly (Angel appears to be a girl and Mr. Pink is glam).
They have partly obscured head (Angle wears a hoody, Mr. Pink starts out in a hair drier).
They lead to wild eyes stare into space; the lyric from Bad Habits describes how one half of Angel dies.
The live by night and disappear in the morning.
They like mirrors.
They are another side of Ed, or at least Mr. Pink clearly is. Angel was supposedly someone that Ed met in a homeless person's shelter but, I think back in his busking days, Ed used to stay in shelters himself.
I think this alter ego is also the second person who has the photograph of Ed Sheeran, in his hit song "Photograph," since just at the point where Ed sings "inside the necklace you got when you were 16," the official promotion video shows a picture of Ed Sheeran looking to be about 16, dressed up as a pirate, wearing a gold necklace with a locket. Ed seems to like pirates. He did pirate as a child and dressed dressed up as a similar pirate, complete with gold necklace and locket, at about he time of the release of Photograph, but few seem to have noticed that, judging by who owns the necklace and locket, he was singing a love song to the pirate side of himself. As a number of psychologists argue, we observe the images and words that represent ourselves from the point of view of another within ourselves.
A similar sort of self love can also be found in Lego House.
In Bad Habits, after popping a lot of balloons and just before seeing himself pop like a balloon, Mr. Pink pops a balloon in front of a vampire girl. To me he seems to be saying, "it (your ego) is just a balloon" (or photograph, or magazine) and, "It's okay. We are all vampirates really." The scary (vampire, pirate, prostitute) nature of our alter ego is as far as I know only hinted at by Ed, but claimed by Kitarou Nishida (1967).
The above image was made using FaceApp to morph an image of myself, as "Angel," and the images below
www.piqsels.com/en/public-domain-photo-ffbuv
www.nicepng.com/ourpic/u2w7a9a9q8q8q8q8_vinyl-car-sticker...
freesvg.org/gold-chain-curved-as-a-01
Should anyone wish that I cease and desist please leave a comment or email me via the email link at my homepage
Nishida, Kitaro (1965/?) “Zettai mujunteki jikodōitsu” 絶対矛盾的自己同一 (Absolutely Contradictory Self-
identity), 西田幾多郎全集, Iwanami Shoten vol. 9. or free in html from
www.aozora.gr.jp/cards/000182/files/1755.html
and free in Kindle form from
www.amazon.co.jp/%E7%B5%B6%E5%AF%BE%E7%9F%9B%E7%9B%BE%E7%...
754 環境が自己否定的に自己自身を主体化するということは、自己自身をメフィスト化することである。直観的世界の底には、悪魔が潜んでいるのである。That the environment should give a self-negating autonomy to the ourselves is the literal demonization (making a Mephistopheles) of ourselves. The devil hides at the bottom of the world of intuition (or pure sight).
This is a mental health practitioner's perspective on hoarding that confirms much of what I've observed with my clients. Some common threads: perfectionism plays a large part in hoarders getting behind with what they do with their stuff thus prompting them to become overwhelmed and then giving up on any sort of housecleaning. Hoarders have an appreciation for things beyond their obvious uses and often are very creative, but seem to lack the organizing gene.
Some interesting insights on the hoarding brain, described as having too many branches on the tree. Meaning that there are multiple paths the mind is prompted to navigate when processing which also leads to overwhelm.
I attended a day long workshop with one of the writers and the take away message from that day was that hoarders have a perception problem. They do not see that their stuff is making their home a dumpster and that they are not actually rescuing anything by picking up one more thing from the "Free" pile on the street. My experience with one client is that she has an inability to know what is important because everything is important.
Some poignant insight about causes of hoarding include absence of warmth, acceptance and support in childhood leading the child to form attachments to things and endow those things with human emotions. Thus they can't throw an item away because there would be no one to look after it.
Little is discussed about treatment in the book. The authors have written other books to help practitioners in the field. This is largely an anecdotal book and the stories of hoarders do offer a lot of insight since you get the whole history.
I have a couple of bones to pick with the book. The authors mention the National Study Group of Chronic Disorganization which was started by one of my organizing colleagues. The authors believe the term "chronic disorganization" is a euphemism for hoarders. I think that's unfair; a case of a hammer seeing everything as a nail. Mental health practitioners are guilty of seeing every thing in pathological terms. Everyone who has clutter is not automatically a hoarder. Hoarders have an attachment to their stuff that goes beyond the utility of the item. Plenty of people with clutter would be happy to let it go once they found the things they really needed.
The authors also don't think that the members of the NSGCD go far enough to actually help hoarders. I think we're changing that especially since she told us how. Cognitive therapy is the prescribed mental health treatment for hoarders. This just means that someone sits with the hoarder and asks questions that would lead them through to a rational conclusion about why they are keeping an item.
In addition I like to keep the hoarder working on sorting their stuff for so long, they are sick of it and they vow never to let it get this bad again. Then I coach them on setting limits on the incoming stuff. I also let them talk about the stuff or if they prefer, they can ask me to talk about something—anything if they want to take their minds off it. I feel this raises their self-esteem to be able to relate to me on an intellectual topic rather than wallow in the shame of their mess. Higher self-esteem often results in a higher level of energy for the task at hand. This is the Amanda theory that will either make or break me in this work.
Cognitive therapy is all about getting the client to look at their feelings while sorting through stuff. Then helping them to get past their sticking points. The theory goes that when the emotion is worked through the therapist can help diminish it, but I had a therapist tell me yesterday that this isn't necessarily so. People just like to go on about their feelings about everything. Some therapists create a crisis around the stuff on purpose to light a fire under them. This is too messy for me. Therapists like emotional messes. I like to bypass all the guilt, blame, grief, etc., etc., in favor of just getting the job done. I have had clients tell me they appreciate this quiet efficiency. Others like the drama and I am there for that too, but I don't go looking for it.
Materials are the building blocks of all functional structures. TWI's expertise lies in understanding the complex interactions that take place when basic materials are transformed into functional shapes and joined together in different working environments.
Choosing materials that are cost-effective and also offer predictable in-service performance is essential to ensure reliable operation and avoid the potentially catastrophic consequences of in-service failure.
TWI has over 60 years' experience in material characterisation, testing, performance evaluation and suitability studies. It can provide assistance at any stage of a project - from feasibility studies, to design, implementation, and proof of performance.
In addition, TWI can advise on choice of materials and fabrication routes and validate new developments. In the unfortunate situation of a failure, TWI's experts can carry out a failure investigation and propose the necessary recommendations to avoid failures in the future.
For more information www.twi.co.uk/technologies/material-properties/
If you wish to use this image each use should be accompanied by the credit line and notice, "Courtesy of TWI Ltd".
Turning Technologies is part of the Youngstown Business Incubator, and is the fastest-growing private software company in the country. Its ResponseCard XR, being packed for shipping above, allows audiences to respond to a PowerPoint presentation.
The Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was the largest New Left organization 1965-69 with chapters at more than 300 campuses and drawing upwards of 100,000 members and supporters. The group broke up into three factions in the summer of 1969 and was never replaced in size or influence on the nation’s campuses.
The group could trace its origins back to the League for Industrial Democracy established in 1905 and was formally constituted the Students for a Democratic Society in 1960. It began to become an important organization with the issuance of the Port Huron statement in 1962 that defined its analysis and vision.
New Left Notes replaced the Bulletin in January 1966 and published until 1969. It was tabloid-sized and more free-form than the Bulletin, but served much of the same purpose containing opinion pieces, news and a forum for debate.
We believe we have all New Left Notes. We believe Vol. 4 No. 10 is a phantom issue and that the numbering is off by one digit from that point on, but retain it in the numbering system in the event we are wrong.
Vol. 1 No. 1 – January 21, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-01-21-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 2 – January 28, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-01-28-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 3 – February 4, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-02-04-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 4 – February 11, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-02-11-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 5 – February 18, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-02-18-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 6 – February 25, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-02-25-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 7 – March 4, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-03-04-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 8 – March 11, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-03-11-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 9 – March 18, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-03-18-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 10 – March 25, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-03-25-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 11 – April 1, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-04-01-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 12 – April 8, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-04-08-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 13 – April 15, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-04-15-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 14 – April 22, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-04-22-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 15 – April 29, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-04-29-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 16 – May 6, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-05-06-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 17 – May 13, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-05-13-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 18 – May 20, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-05-20-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 19 – May 27, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-05-27-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 20 – June 3, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-06-03-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 21 – June 10, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-06-10-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 22 – June 17, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-06-17-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 23 – June 24, 1966 (pages 5, 6 missing) - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-06-24-vo...
Vol. 1 No. 24 – July 1, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-07-01-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 25 – July 8, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-07-08-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 26 & 27 – July 15 & 22, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-07-15-22...
Vol. 1 No. 28 – July 29, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-07-29-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 29 – August 5, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-08-05-vo...
Vol. 1 No. 30 – August 12, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-08-12-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 31 – August 19, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-08-19-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 32 – August 24, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-08-24-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 33 – September 2, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-09-02-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 34 – September 9, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-09-09-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 35 – September 16, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-09-16-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 36 – September 23, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-09-23-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 37 – October 1, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-10-01-sd...
Vol. 1 No 38 – October 7, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-10-07-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 39 – October 14, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-10-14-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 40, 41 – October 28, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-10-28-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 42 - November 4, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-11-04-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 42 – November 11, 1966 - (mis-numbered) washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-11-11-sd...
Vol 1 No. 44 - November 18, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-11-18-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 45 – November 25, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-11-25-ne...
Vol. 1 No 46 – December 2, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-12-02-sd...
Vol. 1 No. 47 – December 9, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-12-09-ne...
Vol. 1 No. 48 – December 16, 1966 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1966-12-16-nl...
Vol. 1 No. 49 – December 23, 1966 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1966-12-23-nl...
Vol. 1 No 49 – December 30, 1966 (mis-numbered) – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1966-12-30-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 1 – January 6, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-01-06-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 2 – January 13, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-01-13-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 3 – January 20, 1967 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-01-20-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 4 – January 27, 1967 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-01-27-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 5 – February 3, 1967 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-02-03-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 6 – February 13, 1967 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-02-13-nl...
Vol. 2. No. 7 – February 20, 1967 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-02-20-nl...
Vol. 2. No. 8 – February 27, 1967 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-02-27-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 9 – March 6, 1967 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-03-06-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 10 – March 13, 1967 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-03-13-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 11 – March 20, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-03-20-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 12 – March 27, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-03-27-nl...
Vol. 2 No 13 – April 3, 1967 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-04-03-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 14 – April 13, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-04-13-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 15 – April 17, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-04-17-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 16 – April 24, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-04-24-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 17 – May 1, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-05-01-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 18 – May 8, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-05-08-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 19 – May 15, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-05-15-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 20 – May 22, 1967 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-05-22-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 21 – May 22, 1967 – (mis-dated) – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-05-22-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 22 – June 5, 1967 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-06-05-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 23 – June 12, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-06-12-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 24 – June 29, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-06-29-ne...
Vol. 2 No. 25 – June 26, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-06-26-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 26 – July 10, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-07-10-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 27 – July 24, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-07-24-ne...
Vol. 2 No. 28 – August 7, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-08-07-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 29 – August 21, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-08-21-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 30 – September 4, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-09-04-ne...
Vol. 2 No. 31 – September 11, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-09-11-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 32 – September 18, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-09-18-ne...
Vol. 2 No. 33 – September 25, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-09-25-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 34 – October 2, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-10-02-ne...
Vol. 2 No. 35 – October 9, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-10-09-ne...
Vol. 2 No. 36 – October 16, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-10-16-ne...
Vol. 2 No. 37 – October 23, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-10-23-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 38 – October 30, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-10-30-ne...
Vol. 2 No. 38 – November 6, 1967 - (mis-numbered) - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-11-06-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 39 – November 13, 1967 – (mis-numbered) - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-11-13-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 41 – November 27, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-11-27-ne...
Vol. 2 No. 42 – December 4, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-12-04-ne...
Vol. 2 No. 43 – December 4, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1967-12-04-nl...
Vol. 2 No. 44 – December 18, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-12-18-ne...
Vol. 2 No. 45 – December 25, 1967 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1967-12-25-ne...
Vol. 3 No. 1 – January 8, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-01-08-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 2 – January 15, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-01-15-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 3 – January 22, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-01-22-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 4 – January 29, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-01-29-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 5 – February 5, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-02-05-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 6 – February 12, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-02-12-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 7 – February 19, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-02-19-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 7 – February 26, 1968 – (mis-numbered) - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-02-26-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 8 – March 4, 1968 – (mis-numbered) - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-03-04-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 10 – March 18, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-03-18-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 11 – March 25, 1968 washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-03-25-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 12 – April 8, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-04-08-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 13 – April 15, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-04-15-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 14 – April 22, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-04-22-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 15 – April 29, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-04-29-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 16 – May 6, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-05-06-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 17 – May 13, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1968-05-13-nl...
Vol. 3 No 18 – May 20, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-05-20-nl...
Vol. 3 No 19 – May 27, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-05-27-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 20 – June 10, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-06-10-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 21 – June 29, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-06-29-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 22 – July 8, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-07-08-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 23 – July 29, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-07-29-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 24 – August 5, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-08-05-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 25 – August 12, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-08-12-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 26 – August 19, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-08-19-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 27 – September 9, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-09-09-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 28 – September 16, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-09-16-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 29 – September 22, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-09-22-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 30 – September 30, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-09-30-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 31 – October. 7, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-10-07-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 32 – October 18, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-10-18-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 33 – October 25, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-10-25-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 34 – November 11, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-11-11-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 35 – November 19, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-11-19-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 36 – December 4, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-12-04-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 37 – December 11, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-12-11-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 38 – December 18, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-12-18-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 39 – December 23, 1968 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1968-12-23-nl...
Vol. 3 No. 40 – January 8, 1969 – (mis-numbered volume and number) washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-01-08-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 2 – January 15, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-01-15-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 3 – January 22, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-01-22-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 4 – January 29, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-01-29-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 5 – February 5, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-02-05-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 5 – February 5, 1969 (mis-numbered and mis-dated) – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-02-05-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 7 – February 21, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-02-21-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 8 – February 28, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-02-28-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 9 – March 7, 1969 ca. - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1969-03-08-sp...
Vol. 4 No. 10 – unavailable at this time, possibly a phantom issue
Vol. 4 No. 11 – March 13, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-03-13-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 12 – March 20, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1969-03-20-ne...
Vol. 4 No. 13 – April 4, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-04-04-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 14 – April 10, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-04-10-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 15 – April 17, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-04-17-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 16 – April 24, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-04-24-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 17 – May 1, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-05-01-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 18 – May 13, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1969-05-13-ne...
Vol. 4 No. 19 – May 20, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-05-20-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 20 – May 30, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-05-30-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 21- June 6, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-06-06-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 22 – June 18, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/1969-06-newle...
Vol. 4 No. 23 – June 25, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-06-25-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 24 – July 8, 1969 - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-07-08-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 25. – July 24, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-07-24-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 26 – August 1, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-08-01-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 27 – August 8, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-08-08-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 28 – August 23, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-08-23-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 29 – August 29, 1969 – washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-08-29-nl...
Vol. 4 No. 29 – August 29, 1969 (supplement) - washingtonspark.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/1969-08-29-nl...
For other alternative publications, including SDS publications, see washingtonareaspark.com/contributors/periodicals/
PI: Andrew Binkowski, Argonne National Laboratory
Transglutaminase enzymes have been linked to a number of human diseases, including cancers, tissue fibrosis, and neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases. Virtual screening predicted two small compounds to bind to distinct, but neighboring surface cavities on a transglutaminase enzyme. Crystallographic experiments confirmed the predictions (shown here), which are being used to develop a larger compound that bridges the two fragments.
Credit: T. Andrew Binkowski, Ph.D., Midwest Center for Structural Genomics & Biosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory; Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases & Computation Institute, The University of Chicago
Secretary-General Young Tae Kim leads an ITF delegation to India for an event on 30 and 31 January 2023 bringing together Indian and international stakeholders from the transport community to reinforce co-operation on decarbonising transport.
The event advances life cycle analysis, multi-level policy implementation, and international partnerships as part of the Decarbonising Transport in Emerging Economies (DTEE) and NDC Transport Initiative for Asia (NDC-TIA) projects.
Find out more: www.itf-oecd.org/dtee-india