View allAll Photos Tagged Rodinal
Bronica SQ-A Camera
Bronica 50mm f3.5 Lens
Fuji Neopan ACROS 100 ASA Film
Rodinal R09 Developer
Ilford Rapid Fixer
5x7 Seneca Improved View, Tele-Congo 300/5.6, 13x18cm Tasma FN-64 EI100, Rodinal 1+50 8:00
Mmkay, 300mm Congo is certainly 4x5 only (5x7 portraits without movements).
Narrowboat on Slimbridge Canal
Camera: Agfa Isolette ii
Film: Fomapan 100 developed in Rodinal 1:50 for 9 mins
Graflex Graphic View I ; 4 x 5"
Steinheil Orthostigmat 13.5/F6.7
t 1/30 ; f 6.7
Rodinal 1:50; 20 C; 13 min
as EI incrases:
shadow detail falls very fast
tonal range becomes compressed
contrast increases/edge effects increase
negatives become thinner
Scene EV: 3
Yashica FX-3, 50mm
HP5+
Rodinal 1:100 1.5hr stand devel w/ agitation every 30 min
I was given three rolls of 35mm Kodak Technical Pan (expired 2002). I hunted around for a development scheme and finally settled on this. Mostly because I had Rodinal. I'm only posting in case some of you still have some in the fridge.
16 EI
Rodinal 1+150 for thirteen minutes
Agitate with 30 seconds initial inversions, then 3 inversions at 10 minutes,7 minutes,4 minutes, and 1minute counting down. (every 3 minutes)
Regular stop, fix and hypo.
I used 5ml of Rodinal in 750ml of H2O. That gives less than the recommended 10ml of Rodinal but the negatives really look great (full tone scale).
I had to figure out a curve profile as I felt (and still do) that the midtones were not right. Technical Pan is also a dust magnet; lots of healing tool. Even with Rodinal there is virtually no grain.
With this last roll I used a Yellow filter which made life easy to post process.
Kiev-88, Vega 28b 120/2.8, Shanghai GP3, Rodinal 1+50 15min
Well, you get what you pay for. The sticky tape attaching the film to the backing paper got loose while winding second frame, without any change in winding force or something needed. And so went the further frames. The result is here.
I was given three rolls of 35mm Kodak Technical Pan (expired 2002). I hunted around for a development scheme and finally settled on this. Mostly because I had Rodinal. I'm only posting in case some of you still have some in the fridge.
16 EI
Rodinal 1+150 for thirteen minutes
Agitate with 30 seconds initial inversions, then 3 inversions at 10 minutes,7 minutes,4 minutes, and 1minute counting down. (every 3 minutes)
Regular stop, fix and hypo.
I used 5ml of Rodinal in 750ml of H2O. That gives less than the recommended 10ml of Rodinal but the negatives really look great (full tone scale).
I had to figure out a curve profile as I felt (and still do) that the midtones were not right. Technical Pan is also a dust magnet; lots of healing tool. Even with Rodinal there is virtually no grain.
Camera: hasselblad 500 cm
planar zeiss 2.8/80mm cfe T*
film: rollei superpan 200
dev rodinal 1+25 8 min 20C.
Torino italy
2013 mars
Zeiss 6x6cm with Kodak VPK (1912) miniscus instaled instead of original lens.
Ilford 3200 developed in Rodinal (1+10 @ 8:30min)
Rodinal 1+25 for however long I watched it develop for under the safe light.
GreySkies | Photography Blog | Tumblr Blog | Abandoned Edinburgh Blog
Zorki 4K
Jupiter 12, 35mm 2.8
Kodalith at ISO (I don't know)
Developed in a day old 1+50 batch of Rodinal for as long as it took for the images to appear in the tank.
Kodalith can be handled under a '1A Light Red' safe light; I was using a dark red safe light for XRay film so I just watched the images appear and forgot to time it.
This is my second time using Rodinal and so far so good.
Very drunked night couple months ago.
Colour Kodak 100 pushed to 3200 in Rodinal. Grainy as hell. LQ scan.
Trix @400. Developed in rodinal 1:100 for one hour. Semi stand. 30 seconds inversions at the start. 2 inversions after 30 mins. No stop. Fixed for 5 minutes with Ilford Rapid fixer
This is my first roll of Agfaphoto APX100 "New Emulsion". It's quite clear that the new film is manufactured by Ilford for Lupus Imaging. The film comes in the typical black Ilford black tub and the packing has the same style machine print for expiry. The negative has the same font used in the exposure of the film name. The final clue is the identical development times as Ilford's sub brand "Kentmere", 100 film.
Overall it isn't bad I was worried it would horrible as my only other experience has been with Kentmere 400 which wasn't good. This roll was developed in Rodinal for 5.5mins at 1+25. I quite like the tonal levels throughout the film but we'll have to see how it performs with a more modern developer like Kodak's Tmax.