View allAll Photos Tagged Rodinal
Forgot I was using the 90mm! Not only did I shoot myself, I got the front of the camera's rails. Ilford HP5+ in Rodinal 1+50. Should have done n+1 or n+2 on this one.
Diana F+ and Rodinal. Kodak Tri-X 400 developed in Rodinal 1+50 for 18 minutes, semi-stand at 71deg.
A photo I found on my computer from a couple of years ago. [ early 2010 ]
Manchester City Centre.
Rodinal and Pan F.
Nikon 35mm camera and glass.
[ It says D200 cause I used to photograph my negs with a D200, when I did not have a scanner ]
Voigtlander Bessa R, 35mm/2.5 Voigtlander Lens, Rollei Retro 80s film developed in Rodinal 1+50 for 14 minutes @ 20 C
I was given three rolls of 35mm Kodak Technical Pan (expired 2002). I hunted around for a development scheme and finally settled on this. Mostly because I had Rodinal. I'm only posting in case some of you still have some in the fridge.
16 EI
Rodinal 1+150 for thirteen minutes
Agitate with 30 seconds initial inversions, then 3 inversions at 10 minutes,7 minutes,4 minutes, and 1minute counting down. (every 3 minutes)
Regular stop, fix and hypo.
I used 5ml of Rodinal in 750ml of H2O. That gives less than the recommended 10ml of Rodinal but the negatives really look great (full tone scale).
I had to figure out a curve profile as I felt (and still do) that the midtones were not right. Technical Pan is also a dust magnet; lots of healing tool. Even with Rodinal there is virtually no grain.
Semi-Stand test with 500ml of Rodinal (Adonal) diluted 1:100 at 70F for 2 hours. 1 minute of initial agitation and 3 gentle swirls of the tank every 30 minutes: Kodak TriX 400 (135) shot at ISO 3200: '61 Zorki-4: Jupiter-12 35mm f/2.8: Parameters = 1/250th at f/4
There looks to be some exposure unevenness in the taekwondo shots. At first I thought this was caused by the development process but based on the lack of the same pattern on the shots taken under normal light and slower shutter speeds I believe this may be attributable to the fluorescent lighting in the building. Incandescent lights produce a constant intensity light since the element glows from resistance induced heating. Gas discharge lights produce a cyclic pattern of light intensity that, due the frequency, will affect pictures and video taken at higher shutter speeds. The pattern is consistent with light frequency anomalies you would expect to see for horizontal travel curtains and the slow curtain travel speeds of these old cameras. The gap between the curtains during travel at higher shutter speeds with slow curtain travel times (in this case 1/250th) is narrow and would, I believe, produce the effects seen here.
R.B. Graflex B, Kodak no33 Anastigmat, Kodak Tri-X Pan exp 05/1987, Rodinal 1+50 15min
1st and 13th exposure with 12-sheet bagmag.
1st test of Kentmere 400. Shot with Contax G2 28mm Biogon and developed with Rodinal 1:25 for 7.5 mins.
I was given three rolls of 35mm Kodak Technical Pan (expired 2002). I hunted around for a development scheme and finally settled on this. Mostly because I had Rodinal. I'm only posting in case some of you still have some in the fridge.
16 EI
Rodinal 1+150 for thirteen minutes
Agitate with 30 seconds initial inversions, then 3 inversions at 10 minutes,7 minutes,4 minutes, and 1minute counting down. (every 3 minutes)
Regular stop, fix and hypo.
I used 5ml of Rodinal in 750ml of H2O. That gives less than the recommended 10ml of Rodinal but the negatives really look great (full tone scale).
I had to figure out a curve profile as I felt (and still do) that the midtones were not right. Technical Pan is also a dust magnet; lots of healing tool. Even with Rodinal there is virtually no grain.
My first attempt at stand development with Rodinal and Tri-X 400.
A couple of things went wrong, most noticeably the area of density towards the right and curious black spots at the edge.
I must admit that Rodinal had a "punch" to the images that I wasn't able to get with normal T-Max developer and I expect to continue using it over T-max.