View allAll Photos Tagged Rodinal
6x9 65/8 Schneider SA + y2 filter, 120 Fomapan 200, Rodinal 1+50 10min
Fomapan 200 test, emulsion no. 010756 1, exp 05/2015. Latitude is there, tones as well. But why there have to be those microscratches :( Will see, how well does it print.
I was given three rolls of 35mm Kodak Technical Pan (expired 2002). I hunted around for a development scheme and finally settled on this. Mostly because I had Rodinal. I'm only posting in case some of you still have some in the fridge.
16 EI
Rodinal 1+150 for thirteen minutes
Agitate with 30 seconds initial inversions, then 3 inversions at 10 minutes,7 minutes,4 minutes, and 1minute counting down. (every 3 minutes)
Regular stop, fix and hypo.
I used 5ml of Rodinal in 750ml of H2O. That gives less than the recommended 10ml of Rodinal but the negatives really look great (full tone scale).
I had to figure out a curve profile as I felt (and still do) that the midtones were not right. Technical Pan is also a dust magnet; lots of healing tool. Even with Rodinal there is virtually no grain.
Rolleiflex SL66 w/ Carl Zeiss 80mm f/2,8
Kodak Tri-X 400 developed in Rodinal 1+25, 6:30min
Vienna, June 28, 2012
staying in a place with no transport access, these children have the most innocent look on their face.. not contaminated by the outside world..
OM2sp + apx400
rodinal 1:100
17mins 24C
6x12 Holgarama, Schneider Super Angulon 65/8, 120 Fomapan 400, Rodinal 1+100 1h semi-stand
Another obligatory tourist exposure from Prague.
A warning: Don't obey ALL road signs.
.
Kodacolour 200 @ ISO800 in R09 for 10 mins 30 secs, 20 degrees.
Forgot I was using the 90mm! Not only did I shoot myself, I got the front of the camera's rails. Ilford HP5+ in Rodinal 1+50. Should have done n+1 or n+2 on this one.
Pentax K1000 SE, lens SMC Pentax-M 1:1.4 50mm, film Legacy 100, Rodinal 1:100 1 hr
gsm40.livejournal.com/139834.html RdLeg_03
A photo I found on my computer from a couple of years ago. [ early 2010 ]
Manchester City Centre.
Rodinal and Pan F.
Nikon 35mm camera and glass.
[ It says D200 cause I used to photograph my negs with a D200, when I did not have a scanner ]
Adox Chs 25 (Efke 25) in Rodinal 1+150 @ 20 degrees C, 1 hour stand development (light agitation first 3 minutes).
Shot with Canonet 17QL GIII
I was given three rolls of 35mm Kodak Technical Pan (expired 2002). I hunted around for a development scheme and finally settled on this. Mostly because I had Rodinal. I'm only posting in case some of you still have some in the fridge.
16 EI
Rodinal 1+150 for thirteen minutes
Agitate with 30 seconds initial inversions, then 3 inversions at 10 minutes,7 minutes,4 minutes, and 1minute counting down. (every 3 minutes)
Regular stop, fix and hypo.
I used 5ml of Rodinal in 750ml of H2O. That gives less than the recommended 10ml of Rodinal but the negatives really look great (full tone scale).
I had to figure out a curve profile as I felt (and still do) that the midtones were not right. Technical Pan is also a dust magnet; lots of healing tool. Even with Rodinal there is virtually no grain.
Semi-Stand test with 500ml of Rodinal (Adonal) diluted 1:100 at 70F for 2 hours. 1 minute of initial agitation and 3 gentle swirls of the tank every 30 minutes: Kodak TriX 400 (135) shot at ISO 3200: '61 Zorki-4: Jupiter-12 35mm f/2.8: Parameters = 1/250th at f/4
There looks to be some exposure unevenness in the taekwondo shots. At first I thought this was caused by the development process but based on the lack of the same pattern on the shots taken under normal light and slower shutter speeds I believe this may be attributable to the fluorescent lighting in the building. Incandescent lights produce a constant intensity light since the element glows from resistance induced heating. Gas discharge lights produce a cyclic pattern of light intensity that, due the frequency, will affect pictures and video taken at higher shutter speeds. The pattern is consistent with light frequency anomalies you would expect to see for horizontal travel curtains and the slow curtain travel speeds of these old cameras. The gap between the curtains during travel at higher shutter speeds with slow curtain travel times (in this case 1/250th) is narrow and would, I believe, produce the effects seen here.