View allAll Photos Tagged Redesign
My thoughts about the new Flickr design have been scattered around in comments on numerous photos and discussion threads. This work-around is an attempt to pull those observations together in one place.
Obviously, I dislike the redesign intensely. My initial reaction was visceral, not a result of reasoned analysis. Since Yahoo dropped this bomb on us I've had more time to live with the new format, experience its features and flaws and figure out some of the reasons why it's so unsatisfactory.
First, in emphasizing the large display of images, Flickt has chosen to demote the role of accompanying text. In the photostream, titles are often truncated and captions have been removed to different pages. Yes, users can still get to the text but they have to do more digging, clicking and waiting.
There are certain images that can stand alone, without explanation. "Mona Lisa" comes to mind. But there are other images that are completely useless without the related text. Imagine photos of the FBI's ten-most-wanted displayed with no relevant text.
Much of my nature photography requires explanation. This stuff isn't just eye-candy. From the image alone, viewers sometimes can't figure out the phyllum of a specimen or even whether it dwells on land or in water. My Flickr archive is often used by people as a field guide -- a useful tool in identifying their own discoveries. That task just got harder with the new format.
Good communication requires the marriage of the right image with the right words. Flickr has chosen to rupture that balance. Overall, the new design favors eye-candy over communication, information and utility.
Second, the new format is much too slow to load and navigate. The use of long scrolls for the photostream and on other pages taxes DSL download speeds. I find I have to spend a lot more time twiddling my thumbs while waiting on Flickr servers. These numerous long wait-states make it harder and more time-consuming to peruse the work of other contributors. The end result is a reduction in the usefulness of the service for anything more than passively scrolling pretty pictures.
My average daily traffic is down about 30 percent since Flickr rolled out the new design. I suspect the decline is due to a combination of factors: The subordination of text, the slower navigation among pages and a overall reduction in the time that unhappy users spend with the service.
Third, the aesthetic choices embodied in the new design are highly questionable. I hate the choice of displaying all images in the photostream edge-to-edge with no white space. Imagine an art gallery or museum hanging all its images edge-to-edge, floor-to-ceiling, in the order acquired, with no regard for arrangement or juxtaposition. Although Flickr claimed its intent was to highlight photos, the effect of this crowding is just the opposite. Great work gets lost in the clutter. Everything is diminished.
The heavy emphasis on the use of black backgrounds is just bizarre. Occasionally, this technique will present a particular image well, but it fails as an overall approach. There are good reasons why the art galleries and museums of the world do not paint their walls black. It distorts the perception of the work.
Another of the dysfunctional design choices was Flickr's decision to display images in the portrait orientation at half the size of images in the landscape orientation. Of all the criteria that could be used in configuring a photostream, I find it very hard to believe that any competent designer would think it wise to apply an additional squeeze to all images in the portrait orientation.
The worst design decision of all is the algorithm now used to display images on the "sets" page. The cropping is so severe and so illogical that a large percentage of the images are rendered unrecognizable. Flickr has turned them into visual mush. I just can't conceive of someone writing that code and believing they did a good job. I can't conceive of a supervisor approving it. (Imagine the explosion that would have occurred if an employee at Apple ever presented a design choice like that to Steve Jobs.)
Fourth, I seriously question the new one-size-fits-all approach to the display of images. Flickr users run the full range of photo competency from full-time professionals to tweens with their first cell-phone cameras. It's absurd to think there is a single style of display to suit their very different requirements and preferences. The old design had at least a few choices for display of the photosteam. A logical improvement would have been to offer more options for customization. The new one-size-fits-all design fails to take into account the needs of very different users and fails to take advantage of the potential of the computers and the web for a degree of customization.
The most damaging effect of all is that those of us who have entrusted our photo archives to Flickr now must recognize that it is a less reliable long-term partner than we thought. If they disrupt the service so badly in May 2013, what will they do -- without warning -- next year or the year after? My nightmare is that Yahoo may incrementally make Flickr more like its new toy, Tumblr, then finally decide to fold it into Tumblr. (For those of you who have been blessedly unaware of Tumblr, it's sort of a snarky clip-art blog for adolecents presented as a infinite scroll, with a very low proportion of original content and heavy focus on all the usual teen issues.)
I won't abandon Flickr anytime soon. It still offers some benefits such as good indexing by the search engines. But I now have to start putting in time on development of alternatives for my archive. About two-thirds of the photos posted to these Flickr pages are also displayed in the CalPhotos database. One immediate goal will be to get a couple thousand more images into CalPhotos. But I'll also have to figure out which online services could provide a decent long-term altenative to Flickr and start shifting focus.
I'll also devote a bit of effort to contriving a few work-arounds to try to mitigate some of the shortcomings of the new design. For example, I may start using longer titles on images, incorporating more of the information previously presented in the captions. This change would do a little bit to elevate the salience of the text.
_______________________________________________________________________
+++ DISCLAIMER +++
Nothing you see here is real, even though the conversion or the presented background story might be based historical facts. BEWARE!
Some background:
The Fiat G.91Y was an Italian ground attack and reconnaissance aircraft that first flew in 1966. Resembling its predecessor, the Fiat G.91, the aircraft was a complete redesign, a major difference being its twin-turbojet engines for a considerably increased performance.
Funded by the Italian government, the G.91Y prototype was based on the G.91T two-seat trainer variant with a single Bristol Orpheus turbojet engine. This was replaced with two afterburning General Electric J85 turbojets which increased thrust by 60%. Structural modifications to reduce airframe weight increased performance further and an additional fuel tank occupying the space of the G.91T's rear seat provided extra range. Combat manoeuvrability was improved with the addition of automatic leading edge slats.
The avionics equipment of the G.91Y was considerably upgraded with many of the American, British and Canadian systems being license-manufactured in Italy.
Flight testing of three pre-production aircraft was successful with one aircraft reaching a maximum speed of Mach 0.98. Airframe buffeting was noted and was rectified in production aircraft by raising the position of the tailplane slightly.
An initial order of 55 aircraft for the Italian Air Force was completed by Fiat in March 1971, by which time the company had changed its name to Aeritalia (from 1969, when Fiat aviazione joined the Aerfer). The order was increased to 75 aircraft with 67 eventually being delivered. In fact, the development of the new G.91Y was quite long, and the first order was for about 20 pre-series examples that followed the two prototypes.
Like the G.91 before, the G.91Y attained much interest as it was a versatile light fighter bomber. One of the countries that ahd an eye on the upgraded Gina was Switzerland, looking for a dedicated support or even replacement for the Hawker Hunters, which were primarily used in the interceptor role, as well as the outdated D. H. Venom fighter bombers.
Fiat's answer was the G.91YS, a version tailored to Swiss needs. A first prototype with enhanced avionics, a strengthened structure for higher external loads as well as for typical operations on short runways with steep climbs and extra hardpoints to carry AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles for evaluation by Switzerland.
The first G.91YS flew on 16 October 1970, but at that time it was already clear that the machine was to carry smart weapons, primarily the AGM-65 'Maverick', which was also earmarked as new, additional Hawker Hunter ordnance.
In order to get things moving the Swiss Air Force ordered in 1972 an initial batch of 22 G.91YS, knowing that an upgrade would become necessary soon. It was a kind of stopgap purchase, though, because the original types for that role, Vought A-7 or the Mirage III derivative Milan S, were rejected after long negotiations. The G.91YS was a more simple and cost effective option, and also as a better option than a short-notice offer for second hand A-4Bs in late 1972.
The new machines were delivered until summer 1974 and allocated to Fliegerstaffel 22 which exclusively operated the fighter bomber. This came just in time because by 1975 plans were laid to replace the Hunter in the air-to-air role with a more modern fighter aircraft, the Northrop F-5E Tiger II (which became operational in 1978). The Hunter remained in a key role within the Swiss Air Force, though. Like the RAF's Hunter fleet, the type transitioned to become the country's primary ground attack platform, completely replacing the Venom, while the G.91YS was regarded as more sophisticated attack aircraft against small, single targets, including tanks (with Soviet mobile tactical missile launch platforms in mind), relying on the AGM-65 as its main armament. Four of these missiles could be carried under the wings, plus a pair of AIM-9 for self-defense. Alternative loads included unguided missiles of various sizes (incl. podded launchers), iron bombs or napalm tanks of up to 1.000 lb caliber, or drop tanks on the inner pylons.
The G.91YS’s primary mission as precision strike aircraft was further emphasized through a massive upgrade program in 1982, including improved sensors, a modernized radio system, a nose-mounted laser tracker/range finder (replacing the former Vinten cameras and greatly improving single pass attack capability and accuracy) and the integration of electronic countermeasure (ECM) systems. The upgraded machines were easily recognizable through their more rounded nose shape with a pitot tube mounted on top, a characteristic spine fairing and a radar warning system housing at the top of the fin.
In this form the G.91YS was kept in operational service until 1994, when it was retired together with the Swiss Hunter fleet. Six aircraft had been lost through accidents during the type’s career. Author Fiona Lombardi stated of the retirement of the Hunter and the G.91YS, the Swiss Air Force "definitively lost the capability to carry out air-to-ground operations". With the retirement of the G.91YS fleet Fliegerstaffel 22 was disbanded, too.
General characteristics:
Crew: 1
Length (incl. pitot): 12.29 m (40 ft 11 in)
Wingspan: 9.01 m (29 ft 6.5 in)
Height: 4.43 m (14 ft 6.3 in)
Wing area: 18.13 m² (195.149 ft²)
Empty weight: 4.000 kg (8.810 lb)
Loaded weight: 8.000 kg (17.621 lb)
Max. take-off weight: 9.000 kg (19.825 lb)
Powerplant:
2× General Electric J85-GE-13A turbojets with afterburners, 18.15 kN (4,080 lbf) each
Performance:
Maximum speed: 1.110 km/h (600 kn, 690 mph,
Mach 0.95 at 10,000 m (33,000 ft)
Range: 3,400 km (ferry range with droptanks) (2,110 mls)
Service ceiling: 12,500 m (41,000 ft)
Rate of climb: 86.36 m/s (17,000 ft/min)
Wing loading: 480 kg/m² (98.3 lb/ft² (maximum)
Thrust/weight: 0.47 at maximum loading
Armament:
2× 30 mm (1.18 in) DEFA cannons
6× under-wing pylon stations holding up to maximum of 2.270 kg (5.000 lb) of payload.
The kit and its assembly:
A classic whif – the G.91YS for the Swiss Air Force actually existed, and I just spun the idea further. The compact fighter would have been a suitable addition to the small nation’s air force, and I interpreted it as an addition to the big Hawker Hunter fleet with a dedicated role and with suitable special equipment.
The basis is the Matchbox G.91Y kit with some minor changes:
• A new nose from a Fujimi Harrier GR.3
• The jet exhausts were opened and some interior added
• Flaps were lowered
• Some added detail to the ejection seat
• The spine extension, a simple piece of sprue
• The radar warning fairing is a square piece of styrene sheet
• Replacement of the cast-on guns with hollow steel needles
• The Sidewinder hardpoints come from a Revell F-16A
• The AGM-65s and their launch rails come from a Hasegawa weapon set
Painting and markings:
The bigger challenge, because I did not want to use the typical “Hunter livery” in Extra Dark Sea Grey/SlateGrey/Aluminum – even if it would have been the natural choice for a Swiss aircraft. Choice for alternative yet authentic schemes is narrow, though – late Mirage III or the F-5Es carry a two-tone grey air superiority scheme, and I found this rather unsuitable for an attack aircraft.
So I developed my own design: a mix of the original Italian grey/green scheme and a two-tone pattern that late Turkish RF-4E/TMs carried - but with different colors and all mashed up into a modern, disruptive scheme. Experimental schemes of the German Luftwaffe in the late 70ies for their Alpha Jets and the F-4F fleet (leading to the complex Norm ’81 patterns) also had an influence.
As basic tones I used RAL 6007 (Grüngrau, Revell 67) and Dark Gull Grey (FS36231, Modelmaster, turned out to be a bit too pale for what I wanted to achieve), with added fields of RAL 7000 (Fehgrau, Revell 57) on the upper surfaces and on the mid-waterline flanks – lighter and softer than the original NATO tones and with disruptive lighter blotches that break up the silhouette.
The underside was simply painted in uniform FS36375 (Humbrol 127), which was also carried onto the fin. After a thin black ink wash panels were lightened through dry-brushing.
Cockpit interior was painted with Humbrol 140, the landing gear with a mix of White and Aluminum, trying to emulate look of real aircraft. In order not to make them stand out too much I painted the AGM-65s in olive drab, even though I think all Swiss missiles of that type were white. Artistic freedom…
Decals were puzzled together, e. g. from a Mirage III Carpena sheet and an Italieri Bae Hawk sheet, most stencils come from the OOB sheet (despite being slightly yellowed...).
A simple whif, done in a week, and based on an obscure real-life project. And the G.91 bears more whiffing potential, at least one more is to come!
All of the appendages terminate at the edge of the paper except for the chelicerae. This one is folded from a rectangle. PVA glue was applied with a brush for the shaping.
Google today released Street View, allowing users to zoom in to street level in New York, Miami, San Francisco, Denver and Las Vegas.
Modellen Rosanna från mikas är fotograferad av Mats Lefert och bilden är bildbehandlad av Camilla Jensen. Den som designade kläderna är Emelie Avegren i sammarbete med röda korset
(old hud on left, new hud on right)
This is something that was really bothering me about the old rubidium items. Im redesigning it - and adding three new features. Look for the new update in the next few days!
1 - The edge glow can be changed now separate of the glow texture
2 - the diffuse texture color can now be changed! The biggest benefit is seen when using the cosmos texture variant and picking a different diffuse color than the glow color. The amethyst style also benefits alot from this.
and 3 , arguably most importantly - when you touch a label it will tell you what it does! So this will hopefully clear up any confusion people have been having with using it.
Carsreleaseprice.com – 2017 Ford Flex Redesign – The Ford that is giant automotive planning to add another user to its household; the brand-new 2017 Ford Flex is redesigned with numerous improvements than its predecessors. The new SUV is driven with a 3.6 engine L V6, using EcoBoost ...
Bigadi and I (teamed up as Trashcats) redesigned another Converse print AD for the 250th issue of the Visions Magazin. The "original AD" is shown one spread before our redesigned one.
Editorial/magazine redesign for PileBuck magazine, the international pile drivers' deep foundations and marine contractor's magazine
Designed c.1819, redesign and new railings, 1867-69 by Hippolyte J. Blanc and Robert Matheson. These are private gardens for the owners of the houses on Queen Street, Heriot Row and Abercromby Place which overlook them. The owners pay a fee for the key and for a groundsman to look after the substantial grounds.
There has always been an air of mystery about them to the public because although they are situated in the city centre they have railings, are surrounded by a high hedge and have many trees so no one knows exactly what they are like inside. This is a privileged look of the peaceful private paradise on a tour I went during the Edinburgh Festival.
With Robert Louis Stevenson living at 17 Heriot Row it is said that spending time at this pond, with it's small island, gave him the inspiration for his novel Treasure Island.
In fall 2012, DOT cut the ribbon on a comprehensive redesign of Manhattan’s Delancey Street on the Lower East Side. One of the latest in a series of safety projects citywide, the project shortened pedestrian crossings at 14 locations, increased pedestrian space and crossing time, and enhanced signal timing and travel lanes for vehicles entering and exiting the Williamsburg Bridge.
The redesign adds more than 21,000 square feet of pedestrian space along the street, restricts several vehicle turns and also makes travel lanes more consistent. A new vehicle access point at Clinton Street also simplifies the connection from the FDR Drive, eliminating the need for vehicles to travel through residential streets to reach the bridge via Norfolk Street.
Learn more: on.nyc.gov/PGt5tO
Five lines of embroidery on lengthened jeans. I hid the "fade lines" and added a contemporary design element, too. Choosing to begin and end the line of "leaves" meant that that element remained intact and I did not have to fight the big fat hump. A great choice.
Today we kick off a community driven effort to redesign the musescore.org site and the MuseScore software. Interested to join? musescore.org/en/developers-handbook/design
The mockup proposal is made by Tin Man
Whether it's one-way signage in hospital corridors, ambassadors screening patients and staff at facility entrances, work stations and eating/break areas being redesigned with physical distancing in mind, outdoor emergency department triage areas, COVID-19 drive-through testing sites, or a variety of other measures, our staff have demonstrated flexibility and innovation as we have adapted to the challenges presented by the pandemic.
This is what welcomes our patients at the Seniors Outpatient Clinic at Memorial Pavillion.
The kitty was made by my niece Ginger and the lovely Bonnie Henry sticker was drawn by one of our O.T's Kate.
We are all in this together!
Mairi - Patient Ambassador
Vårprojekt 2015 med utbildningarna vid Modeskolan STHLM och Silversmide & Smyckesdesign, Folkuniversitetet.
Kläder: Lisa Wakie
Smycken: Elisabeth Grigoriu
Fotograf: Evelina Lindqvist
Bildbehandlare: Nikko Knösch
MTA New York City Transit President Andy Byford, Acting Senior Vice President of Buses Craig Cipriano, Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz, Jr., and elected officials announce the final plan for the Bronx Bus Network Redesign at Lou Gehrig Plaza on Tuesday, October 22, 2019.
Photo: Marc A. Hermann / MTA New York City Transit
2017 Toyota Corolla Redesign
2017 Toyota Corolla Redesign – The Chevrolet Camaro isn’t really the only auto celebrating its 50th birthday this year– regardless of its eight-year hiatus in the early ’00s. The 2017 Toyota Corolla also celebrates its gold wedding...
Intellijel is always busy and here are the first results of his Spring work! New versions of the uScale, uStep and Mind Meld. Details:
uStep- now very skiff friendly. The second pcb is parallel to the first and the whole module is about 1" deep. It uses the same buttons as uScale (more flush and easier to run fingers along to program quickly).
Mind Meld- new graphics, all SMT and uses the same kind of slide switches as on the newer Intellijel modules.
uScale- the PCB is about 1cm shorter than the first batch.
More details via this thread: muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36694 .
We now have stock of all three modules:
www.analoguehaven.com/intellijeldesigns/uscale/
Tomb Raider IV box art reimagining by Andy Park: Read more on our official celebration website: tombraider25.square-enix-games.com/en-us/tr4/blog/box-art...
After the redesign of Flickr, i realized that I haven't got any alternative to Flickr. So, I used the last week to finally fulfill my dream: an own website. I don't already know, If I will keep on posting on Flickr ... time will tell.
Here's the link: www.brickup.de
I would be very happy about feedback - right in the comments or via contact form on the site :-)
MTA New York City Transit President Andy Byford, Acting Senior Vice President of Buses Craig Cipriano, Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz, Jr., and elected officials announce the final plan for the Bronx Bus Network Redesign at Lou Gehrig Plaza on Tuesday, October 22, 2019.
Photo: Marc A. Hermann / MTA New York City Transit
NEOBALLS / ZEN MAGNETS - Neodymium Magnetic Balls (@4205) - Starcraft II's Massive Thor
This is my most complex and largest build to date.
It was designed in parts: Cockpit body, then legs, then arms, then rear guns. Then I had to redesign parts when it came time to assemble it together because of incorrect bonding assumptions and misalignment of magnet fields.
Experimented with x-beam coupled bonds to get the maximum lateral strength with reinforcements on the sides. This proved to be very string. Created a X-Beam using similar methods producing a very strong leg structure. It was capable of support the entire weight of the cockpit body w/o a problem. Had to redesign the leg to cockpit body mount point from the earlier concept because the bond was not completely coupled.
Next up were the arm/guns ... the weight was too much for the cockpit body to support so I fashioned a pair of lego-platforms for them to rest on and take the weight off of the central body.
Finally ... the rear guns ... these were a challenge in that their original mount point design had to be reworked also to make them fit correctly into the rear of the cockpit body. I changed the mount points on the guns to fit the space on both sides and added a few support balls to improve the mount point bonds. I was very surprised how they were balanced and supported only by two point sections to the body. The guns stayed in place for a small series of photos.
The design flaw was in the side bonds of the beam to the legs. The coupled field held nicely for a short amount of time and would have held if it didn't have the weight of the rear guns to support. When they were standing upright and straight, all was good. As soon as I attempted to move the platform forward (to take a video), the rear guns tilted slightly backwards and and that was the end of the leg to body support bonds ... and created the dreaded implosion.
The rear gun weight caused the entire central body section to rotate backwards and fall back on the rear guns ... taking the arms in the process. Perhaps I should have created a Lego-support structure for the rear guns to remove the pendulum force backwards ... but that would have created another view blocker like the side Lego-platforms obstructed the view of the legs and feet. Not sure if I can recreate it for a rotational video ... this took over a week (on/off to design and assemble).
Overall ... I was very happy with the result ... hope I captured enough detail to warrant some visual recognition as a Starcraft II Thor reproduction/interpretation.
This was design and built for the Zen Magnets Contest 26: The Massive Thor
www.zenmagnets.com/blog/26-the-massive-thor/
I tried to document the info for this super complex build (below) accompanied by associated pics in this set
www.flickr.com/photos/tend2it/sets/72157632920071597/
Starcraft II Thor Magnet Count and Detail Talley
======+================
Cockpit Body bottom section: (@0520)
(@0217) - Main shape middle core = (2x108) + 1
(@0095) - central bottom layer 1 = (47x2) + 1 w/black parameter
(@0078) - Sides Bottom layer 2 = (2x(22 parallel pair frnt2bck support + 3 red + 4 gold + 10 ring outside black))
(@0028) - Central bottom layer 3 = (2x14) rectangle
(@0032) - Sides bottom layer 3 = (2x((2x5 parallel bridge rectangle to ring) + (6 ring outside))
(@0010) - Central bottom layer 4 = (10 ring) leg waist w/gold
(@0020) - Sides bottom layer 4 = (2x10 ring) coupled over parallel bridge for perpendicular underside support
(@0040) - Central rear Barrel = (4x8 ring w2 red rings) + (2x4 sqr end)
------
Cockpit Body top section (from center out): (@0371)
(@0166) - top layer 1 = (2x83) w/black missle cover + middle sect separator
(@0105) - top layer 2 = ((2x52) + 1) w/black separator, red trim, gold cockpit
(@0083) - top layer 3 = ((2x41) + 1) w/black separator, red trim, gold cockpit
(@0037) - top layer 4 = ((2x18) + 1) w/black separator trim
(@0010) - top layer 5 = (2x5) w/red/black
------
(@0891)
Leg section x2 (@0640 - 12 removed from bottom of @ leg for foot contact pt)
leg internal structure:
(@0384) - columns = 2 x (4x((2x12) + ((2x11) + 2))) top/bottom coupled bonds w/parallel bonds stacked x 4))
(@0096) - side reinforcements = 2x((2x11) + 2) coupled pair along outside edge centers)
(@0032) - ball reinforcements = 2x(2x4 balls are two balls added to 4 ball in 2, 4, 6, 8th positions) - (12 @ bottom)
leg arch structure (connected to one flat leg top face:
(@0128) - (4x4 parallel sqr) + (2x(6 + 2)) pointy rings) + (4x4 parallel sqr) + (2x(6 + 2)) pointy rings)
Place the two leg arch structures together to form the leg arch
-------
(@1519) = 1531-12
Leg side panels (@0384)
(@0344) - (2 each leg x (2x(2x43 each side))) w/black outside trim
Knees + Leg detail
(@0040) - (2x(2x(6 + 2) knee w/red sqr) + 2x(4 red sqr top of leg))
-------
(@1903)
Feet x2 (@0242)
(@0184) - (2x((2x7 + 2 1st mid layer) + (2x(2x10 + 1) 2nd mid layer) + ((2x(2x8 + 1) outside layer))
(@0034) - (2x(2x(2x3 + 1 top of toe 2 leg)) + (1 center rear foot 2 leg conn) + (2 x 1 outer rear foot sides 2 leg
conn))
(@0024) - (2x(2x6 rings rear foot heel))
-------
(@2145)
X-Beam waist platform - (@0233 - 19) this part is placed across the center perpendicular to the x-beam leg arch
(@0214) - (2x(2x(18 + 17 + 6 + 3)) + (2x(7 + 2)) + ((8 + 1 front side) + (2x9 rear side)) + ((2 x 3 red front center) +
(2 x 2 red front sides) + (2 red rear)) - (19 removed under rear panel side to fold)
Arm Guns (2 pair per arm w/red + black accents)
(@0380) - (4x((4x9 center core) + (3x((2x7) + 1)) top/sides) + (2x7) middle join))
Shoulder to elbow core w/o reinforcements ((@0174)per arm)
(@0348) - (2 x (top((2x5)+2) + (4x8+2 parallel) + ((2x5)+2) + (2x5) + (2x(2x5)+1) + (2x(2x6)+1) + ((4x7)+2 parallel
mount2gun) + (1 ball center to bridge below 2 ball center to 1 ball) + ((2x6)+1) + ((2x4)+2)bottom)
Shoulder to elbow (per arm, per side)
(@0248) - (2 x (2 x (top 3 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 4 + 5 + 4 + 4 + 5 + (2x7arm2shoulder bridge) + (5 + 3 bottom))
Elbow to gun support (per arm, per side) (@0140 - 18 for outside facing side revamp)
(@0122) - (2 x (2 x (((2x9)+1) + (2x8)) -
Revamp outside facing sides for Z bracket (remove 2x(4 top/4 bottom/2 middle/move center ball down, add 1 ball)
Revamp 2 rear centerballs with red
(@028) - add red design outside facing shoulder 2 elbow
------
(@3485)
Rear Guns x2
Large cannon (@0112 each)
(@0224) - 2 x ((2x(2x15) + (4x(5+2)) + (4x(6 ring)))
Smaller cannon (@0092 each)
(@0184) - 2 x ((2x(2x13) + (4x(4+2)) + (4x(4 ring)))
Gun bridges (@0010 each)
(@0020) - (2 x (4 ring + 6 ring across two cannons)
Gun mounts x2
(@0104) - (2 x ((top (2x4+2) + (2x5+2) parallel to existing + (2x4+2) + (2x5 parallel) + (2x4+2) bottom)
Gun panel x 2 (@0102 each)
(@0204) - (2 x (2x(11 + 10 + 9 + 8 + 7 + 6))
-------
Revamp base
(@4221) subtotal b4 assembly
Assembly mods
-------------
Moved the (@0040) - Central rear Barrel = (4x8 ring w2 red rings) + (2x4 sqr end) below the rear of the body between
the leg mount and cockpit body. Actually used the barrel as a mount point for the rear guns.
Modded Cockpit Body bottom section (mount point):
(@0020) = (2 x (7 + 6 + 5)) = Changed = (@0028) - Central bottom layer 3 = (2x14) rectangle to covert parallel
rectangle to hex parallel center, coupled sides
-------
(@4213) = (@4221 - 8)
Moved central bottom layer x-beam
(@0018) = (2x09 ring) = Changed = (@0020) - Sides bottom layer 4 = shifted it down one row, removed 1 ball on end to form point and pinched outside end fit in center of 6 ball side.
(@4211) = (@4213 - 2)
Removed gold 10 ball ring mount
Changed = (@0010) = Central bottom layer 4 = (10 ring) leg waist w/gold
-------
(@4201) = (@4213 - 10)
Modded Rear Guns
(@0100) = Changed = Rear Gun mounts x2 - removed +2 from top/bottom mount point (2x4+2)=>(2x4)
(@4197) = (@4201-4)
Added extra mount point support bwtween rear gun mounts and rear cockpit body
(@4205) = (@4201+8)
Grand Total! = (@4205)
New eCYBERMISSION Website Coming Soon!
eCYBERMISSION is excited to give you a preview of our new website! It has a comprehensive, visually appealing layout and improves the navigation through our resources to make it easier to access. The redesign will also enhance our online capabilities and position eCYBERMISSION as a leader in the online STEM world.
The new website will launch in summer 2013. In the meantime, check out the sample screenshots and let us know what you think.
In fall 2012, DOT cut the ribbon on a comprehensive redesign of Manhattan’s Delancey Street on the Lower East Side. One of the latest in a series of safety projects citywide, the project shortened pedestrian crossings at 14 locations, increased pedestrian space and crossing time, and enhanced signal timing and travel lanes for vehicles entering and exiting the Williamsburg Bridge.
The redesign adds more than 21,000 square feet of pedestrian space along the street, restricts several vehicle turns and also makes travel lanes more consistent. A new vehicle access point at Clinton Street also simplifies the connection from the FDR Drive, eliminating the need for vehicles to travel through residential streets to reach the bridge via Norfolk Street.
Learn more: on.nyc.gov/PGt5tO
MTA New York City Transit President Andy Byford, Acting Senior Vice President of Buses Craig Cipriano, Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz, Jr., and elected officials announce the final plan for the Bronx Bus Network Redesign at Lou Gehrig Plaza on Tuesday, October 22, 2019.
Photo: Marc A. Hermann / MTA New York City Transit
Tomb Raider V box art reimagining by Megan Lara: Read more on our official celebration website: tombraider25.square-enix-games.com/en-us/tr5/blog/box-art...
A concept I pitched to Worldnetdaily.com for their homepage. They ended up going another direction, but I'm really proud of my ideas, having kept their homepage's capacity for TONS of pieces and their large "screamer" tabloid story style without overpowering the reader. It's all about scale, folks. Definitely click to view the large size on this one.
here they are the pair of imported Chinese made boots that began to peel even before their first wear. I gave in and peeled off whatever faux leather I could and added these leather patches, secured by a little red embroidery thread and turned them into argyle patterned boots!!! Ladies...NEVER THROW ANYTHING AWAY... hehe ;-)