View allAll Photos Tagged Privacy
Nowadays, we continually share data: a message via WhatsApp, a picture on Instagram, an update on Facebook or an e-mail through Gmail. With whom do we really share this data? And how can we make sure that our personal data stay strictly personal?
This exhibition addresses issues of online privacy and digital surveillance. Next to several historical examples of encrypting, ‘Design my Privacy’ also shows some surprising contemporary strategies by more than 35 young designers and artists to maintain control over our data.
With work by Roel Roscam Abbing, Zineb Benassarou & Jorick De Quaasteniet, Josh Begley, Dennis de Bel, Caitlin Berner & Jana Blom, Heath Bunting, F.A.T., Giada Fiorindi, Front 404, Roos Groothuizen, Arantxa Gonlag & Eva Maria Martinez Rey, Monika Grūzīte, Rafaël Henneberke, Jan Huijben, Daniel C. Howe & Helen Nissenbaum & Vincent Toubiana, Rosa Menkman, Owen Mundy, Naomi Naus, Joyce Overheul, Ruben Pater, Wim Popelier, Freek Rutkens, Vera van de Seyp, Mark Sheppard, Dimitri Tokmetzis & Yuri Veerman, Janne Van Hooff & Christina Yarashevich, Michaele Lakova, Jasper van Loenen, Jeroen van Loon, Esther Weltevrede & Sabine Niederer, Leanne Wijnsma & Froukje Tan, Joeri Woudstra, Sander Veenhof and Simone Niquille.
An exhibition by MOTI, Museum of the Image in Breda (NL)
27.03 to 29.05.2016
Photo: Kristof Vrancken / Z33
On June 25, 2014, Governance Studies at Brookings hosted an event to explore the future of global technology, privacy, and data protection with Brad Smith, executive vice president and general counsel at Microsoft, to address these and other questions. ©Paul Morigi Photography
please respect any ones privacy in these unless u are in the photos and would like to share your story :)
Nowadays, we continually share data: a message via WhatsApp, a picture on Instagram, an update on Facebook or an e-mail through Gmail. With whom do we really share this data? And how can we make sure that our personal data stay strictly personal?
This exhibition addresses issues of online privacy and digital surveillance. Next to several historical examples of encrypting, ‘Design my Privacy’ also shows some surprising contemporary strategies by more than 35 young designers and artists to maintain control over our data.
With work by Roel Roscam Abbing, Zineb Benassarou & Jorick De Quaasteniet, Josh Begley, Dennis de Bel, Caitlin Berner & Jana Blom, Heath Bunting, F.A.T., Giada Fiorindi, Front 404, Roos Groothuizen, Arantxa Gonlag & Eva Maria Martinez Rey, Monika Grūzīte, Rafaël Henneberke, Jan Huijben, Daniel C. Howe & Helen Nissenbaum & Vincent Toubiana, Rosa Menkman, Owen Mundy, Naomi Naus, Joyce Overheul, Ruben Pater, Wim Popelier, Freek Rutkens, Vera van de Seyp, Mark Sheppard, Dimitri Tokmetzis & Yuri Veerman, Janne Van Hooff & Christina Yarashevich, Michaele Lakova, Jasper van Loenen, Jeroen van Loon, Esther Weltevrede & Sabine Niederer, Leanne Wijnsma & Froukje Tan, Joeri Woudstra, Sander Veenhof and Simone Niquille.
An exhibition by MOTI, Museum of the Image in Breda (NL)
27.03 to 29.05.2016
Photo: Kristof Vrancken / Z33
Nowadays, we continually share data: a message via WhatsApp, a picture on Instagram, an update on Facebook or an e-mail through Gmail. With whom do we really share this data? And how can we make sure that our personal data stay strictly personal?
This exhibition addresses issues of online privacy and digital surveillance. Next to several historical examples of encrypting, ‘Design my Privacy’ also shows some surprising contemporary strategies by more than 35 young designers and artists to maintain control over our data.
With work by Roel Roscam Abbing, Zineb Benassarou & Jorick De Quaasteniet, Josh Begley, Dennis de Bel, Caitlin Berner & Jana Blom, Heath Bunting, F.A.T., Giada Fiorindi, Front 404, Roos Groothuizen, Arantxa Gonlag & Eva Maria Martinez Rey, Monika Grūzīte, Rafaël Henneberke, Jan Huijben, Daniel C. Howe & Helen Nissenbaum & Vincent Toubiana, Rosa Menkman, Owen Mundy, Naomi Naus, Joyce Overheul, Ruben Pater, Wim Popelier, Freek Rutkens, Vera van de Seyp, Mark Sheppard, Dimitri Tokmetzis & Yuri Veerman, Janne Van Hooff & Christina Yarashevich, Michaele Lakova, Jasper van Loenen, Jeroen van Loon, Esther Weltevrede & Sabine Niederer, Leanne Wijnsma & Froukje Tan, Joeri Woudstra, Sander Veenhof and Simone Niquille.
An exhibition by MOTI, Museum of the Image in Breda (NL)
27.03 to 29.05.2016
Photo: Kristof Vrancken / Z33
Nowadays, we continually share data: a message via WhatsApp, a picture on Instagram, an update on Facebook or an e-mail through Gmail. With whom do we really share this data? And how can we make sure that our personal data stay strictly personal?
This exhibition addresses issues of online privacy and digital surveillance. Next to several historical examples of encrypting, ‘Design my Privacy’ also shows some surprising contemporary strategies by more than 35 young designers and artists to maintain control over our data.
With work by Roel Roscam Abbing, Zineb Benassarou & Jorick De Quaasteniet, Josh Begley, Dennis de Bel, Caitlin Berner & Jana Blom, Heath Bunting, F.A.T., Giada Fiorindi, Front 404, Roos Groothuizen, Arantxa Gonlag & Eva Maria Martinez Rey, Monika Grūzīte, Rafaël Henneberke, Jan Huijben, Daniel C. Howe & Helen Nissenbaum & Vincent Toubiana, Rosa Menkman, Owen Mundy, Naomi Naus, Joyce Overheul, Ruben Pater, Wim Popelier, Freek Rutkens, Vera van de Seyp, Mark Sheppard, Dimitri Tokmetzis & Yuri Veerman, Janne Van Hooff & Christina Yarashevich, Michaele Lakova, Jasper van Loenen, Jeroen van Loon, Esther Weltevrede & Sabine Niederer, Leanne Wijnsma & Froukje Tan, Joeri Woudstra, Sander Veenhof and Simone Niquille.
An exhibition by MOTI, Museum of the Image in Breda (NL)
27.03 to 29.05.2016
Photo: Kristof Vrancken / Z33
调光玻璃，电控调光玻璃，瞬间调光玻璃，导电光控玻璃，电控变色玻璃，液晶玻璃，电控液晶玻璃，光控液晶玻璃，光致变色玻璃，光变玻璃，光电玻璃，雾幕玻璃，神奇玻璃，夹胶玻璃，夹层玻璃，特种玻璃，装饰玻璃，艺术玻璃，中空玻璃，弯曲玻璃，热弯玻璃，LED,LED玻璃，LED电光源玻璃，电光源玻璃，光源玻璃，变色玻璃，光电玻璃，星光玻璃，霞光玻璃，夜光玻璃，全息玻璃，镭射玻璃，纳米显示玻璃，节能玻璃，魔法玻璃，smart玻璃，智能玻璃，玻璃，美国调光玻璃，钢化玻璃，深加工玻璃，智能调光玻璃，智能光电玻璃，调光荧幕玻璃，投影玻璃，Privacy glass,Smart glass,Smart film,Switchable glass,switchable window,switchable privacy window,switchable privacy glass,PDLC,Privacy door,Lighting glass,Liquid crystal glass,liquid crystal film,Switchable Transparent Film,Switchable Transparent Glass,smart window,green building,green material,nano,Privacy film,electrochromic glass,SPD,STG,STF,laminated glass, insulating glass, magic glass,, switchable visibility glass, switchable light control glass,magic screen glass,Polyvision,
, POLYMAGIC Glass, power glass, LED glass, Power glass, led foil, led film, Hologram glass, nano glass. automotive glass, bend glass, LCG. LOG, laser, lens,Glow，Website www.polytron.com.tw
Nowadays, we continually share data: a message via WhatsApp, a picture on Instagram, an update on Facebook or an e-mail through Gmail. With whom do we really share this data? And how can we make sure that our personal data stay strictly personal?
This exhibition addresses issues of online privacy and digital surveillance. Next to several historical examples of encrypting, ‘Design my Privacy’ also shows some surprising contemporary strategies by more than 35 young designers and artists to maintain control over our data.
With work by Roel Roscam Abbing, Zineb Benassarou & Jorick De Quaasteniet, Josh Begley, Dennis de Bel, Caitlin Berner & Jana Blom, Heath Bunting, F.A.T., Giada Fiorindi, Front 404, Roos Groothuizen, Arantxa Gonlag & Eva Maria Martinez Rey, Monika Grūzīte, Rafaël Henneberke, Jan Huijben, Daniel C. Howe & Helen Nissenbaum & Vincent Toubiana, Rosa Menkman, Owen Mundy, Naomi Naus, Joyce Overheul, Ruben Pater, Wim Popelier, Freek Rutkens, Vera van de Seyp, Mark Sheppard, Dimitri Tokmetzis & Yuri Veerman, Janne Van Hooff & Christina Yarashevich, Michaele Lakova, Jasper van Loenen, Jeroen van Loon, Esther Weltevrede & Sabine Niederer, Leanne Wijnsma & Froukje Tan, Joeri Woudstra, Sander Veenhof and Simone Niquille.
An exhibition by MOTI, Museum of the Image in Breda (NL)
27.03 to 29.05.2016
Photo: Kristof Vrancken / Z33
Domain privacy is for those who do not want the whole world to know that they own a particular domain. This can be just a single domain or a whole group of domains. Why don’t you want people to know that you own it? Some reasons may be:
The domain is not something that you are publicly associated with. This does not just mean adult sites, this may mean sites that are in stark contrast to what you do for a living on a daily basis
The domain is associated to a company, not necessarily to you alone, so you do not want to hog the spotlight from everyone else
You do not want your personal details including your contact information, open to everyone, regardless of what your domain is.
To more details contact us.....
www.bestwebhostingratings.com/features/ipage-domain-privacy/
Nowadays, we continually share data: a message via WhatsApp, a picture on Instagram, an update on Facebook or an e-mail through Gmail. With whom do we really share this data? And how can we make sure that our personal data stay strictly personal?
This exhibition addresses issues of online privacy and digital surveillance. Next to several historical examples of encrypting, ‘Design my Privacy’ also shows some surprising contemporary strategies by more than 35 young designers and artists to maintain control over our data.
With work by Roel Roscam Abbing, Zineb Benassarou & Jorick De Quaasteniet, Josh Begley, Dennis de Bel, Caitlin Berner & Jana Blom, Heath Bunting, F.A.T., Giada Fiorindi, Front 404, Roos Groothuizen, Arantxa Gonlag & Eva Maria Martinez Rey, Monika Grūzīte, Rafaël Henneberke, Jan Huijben, Daniel C. Howe & Helen Nissenbaum & Vincent Toubiana, Rosa Menkman, Owen Mundy, Naomi Naus, Joyce Overheul, Ruben Pater, Wim Popelier, Freek Rutkens, Vera van de Seyp, Mark Sheppard, Dimitri Tokmetzis & Yuri Veerman, Janne Van Hooff & Christina Yarashevich, Michaele Lakova, Jasper van Loenen, Jeroen van Loon, Esther Weltevrede & Sabine Niederer, Leanne Wijnsma & Froukje Tan, Joeri Woudstra, Sander Veenhof and Simone Niquille.
An exhibition by MOTI, Museum of the Image in Breda (NL)
27.03 to 29.05.2016
Photo: Kristof Vrancken / Z33
Nowadays, we continually share data: a message via WhatsApp, a picture on Instagram, an update on Facebook or an e-mail through Gmail. With whom do we really share this data? And how can we make sure that our personal data stay strictly personal?
This exhibition addresses issues of online privacy and digital surveillance. Next to several historical examples of encrypting, ‘Design my Privacy’ also shows some surprising contemporary strategies by more than 35 young designers and artists to maintain control over our data.
With work by Roel Roscam Abbing, Zineb Benassarou & Jorick De Quaasteniet, Josh Begley, Dennis de Bel, Caitlin Berner & Jana Blom, Heath Bunting, F.A.T., Giada Fiorindi, Front 404, Roos Groothuizen, Arantxa Gonlag & Eva Maria Martinez Rey, Monika Grūzīte, Rafaël Henneberke, Jan Huijben, Daniel C. Howe & Helen Nissenbaum & Vincent Toubiana, Rosa Menkman, Owen Mundy, Naomi Naus, Joyce Overheul, Ruben Pater, Wim Popelier, Freek Rutkens, Vera van de Seyp, Mark Sheppard, Dimitri Tokmetzis & Yuri Veerman, Janne Van Hooff & Christina Yarashevich, Michaele Lakova, Jasper van Loenen, Jeroen van Loon, Esther Weltevrede & Sabine Niederer, Leanne Wijnsma & Froukje Tan, Joeri Woudstra, Sander Veenhof and Simone Niquille.
An exhibition by MOTI, Museum of the Image in Breda (NL)
27.03 to 29.05.2016
Photo: Kristof Vrancken / Z33
A tranquil island of privacy within a surrounding sea of national forest — not a neighbor or city light in sight. Peace Ranch feels like thousands of acres, many more than the expansive 600± acres that make up this one-of-a-kind ranch, just outside the quaint town of Basalt. A premier, year-round sporting and equestrian ranch, Peace Ranch is as abundant with opportunity as the White River National Forest that surrounds its borders. With a 29,000-square-foot, multi-use indoor arena; five, individual rustic chic residences; 100+ acres of irrigated pastures; stocked trout ponds and ample wildlife for fishing and hunting enthusiasts, plus mile after mile of nature trails — all minutes to gold-medal fishing in the Frying Pan River and shredding the slopes in Aspen and Snowmass — this location is a hidden slice of heaven in the greater Roaring Fork Valley. Crisp mountain air. 360 degree views. Architecturally stunning and environmentally complimentary facilities. Opportunity to subdivide. All exclusively for your enjoyment, if you give peace a chance. More here: hubs.ly/y03ZSZ0
Notes from O'Reilly 's Strata Europe 2013 conference.
Digital Analytics & Privacy by Aurélie Pols
Featuring the Privacy Tri-Partite. (Aurélie also had a ton of practical tips - such as make sure contractors no longer have access to any of the data after the project ends - but I ran out of space.)
Creative Commons Attribution. Please credit as: Ann Wuyts (@vintfalken) for www.jini.co - CC By 2.0
Privacy set to "Public" by default, skipping this step leaves account open to the public. Its settings like this that make people vary of location aware software ( LAS ), possibly contributing to the paranoia. Would love to start a Google group and get people from Bright Kite, Dodge Ball, et al and discuss this. A universal standard for the default settings of LAS could be agreed upon then promoted, logo created?
Carnegie Mellon celebrated National Data Privacy Day on Jan. 28 with several events at the Cohon University Center.
Moderator at the Privacy Revolution session at the ALA annual conference in Anaheim, June 2008. The session included Dan Roth with Wired magazine, Beth Givens with the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, and Cory Doctorow. Absolutely amazing!
Nowadays, we continually share data: a message via WhatsApp, a picture on Instagram, an update on Facebook or an e-mail through Gmail. With whom do we really share this data? And how can we make sure that our personal data stay strictly personal?
This exhibition addresses issues of online privacy and digital surveillance. Next to several historical examples of encrypting, ‘Design my Privacy’ also shows some surprising contemporary strategies by more than 35 young designers and artists to maintain control over our data.
With work by Roel Roscam Abbing, Zineb Benassarou & Jorick De Quaasteniet, Josh Begley, Dennis de Bel, Caitlin Berner & Jana Blom, Heath Bunting, F.A.T., Giada Fiorindi, Front 404, Roos Groothuizen, Arantxa Gonlag & Eva Maria Martinez Rey, Monika Grūzīte, Rafaël Henneberke, Jan Huijben, Daniel C. Howe & Helen Nissenbaum & Vincent Toubiana, Rosa Menkman, Owen Mundy, Naomi Naus, Joyce Overheul, Ruben Pater, Wim Popelier, Freek Rutkens, Vera van de Seyp, Mark Sheppard, Dimitri Tokmetzis & Yuri Veerman, Janne Van Hooff & Christina Yarashevich, Michaele Lakova, Jasper van Loenen, Jeroen van Loon, Esther Weltevrede & Sabine Niederer, Leanne Wijnsma & Froukje Tan, Joeri Woudstra, Sander Veenhof and Simone Niquille.
An exhibition by MOTI, Museum of the Image in Breda (NL)
27.03 to 29.05.2016
Photo: Kristof Vrancken / Z33
this picture is portraying someone invading another's privacy by stealing from their wallet. i used filters to make it black and white and make it look as if it were a security camera. this was supposed to add a devious effect to the feeling of the photo
Nowadays, we continually share data: a message via WhatsApp, a picture on Instagram, an update on Facebook or an e-mail through Gmail. With whom do we really share this data? And how can we make sure that our personal data stay strictly personal?
This exhibition addresses issues of online privacy and digital surveillance. Next to several historical examples of encrypting, ‘Design my Privacy’ also shows some surprising contemporary strategies by more than 35 young designers and artists to maintain control over our data.
With work by Roel Roscam Abbing, Zineb Benassarou & Jorick De Quaasteniet, Josh Begley, Dennis de Bel, Caitlin Berner & Jana Blom, Heath Bunting, F.A.T., Giada Fiorindi, Front 404, Roos Groothuizen, Arantxa Gonlag & Eva Maria Martinez Rey, Monika Grūzīte, Rafaël Henneberke, Jan Huijben, Daniel C. Howe & Helen Nissenbaum & Vincent Toubiana, Rosa Menkman, Owen Mundy, Naomi Naus, Joyce Overheul, Ruben Pater, Wim Popelier, Freek Rutkens, Vera van de Seyp, Mark Sheppard, Dimitri Tokmetzis & Yuri Veerman, Janne Van Hooff & Christina Yarashevich, Michaele Lakova, Jasper van Loenen, Jeroen van Loon, Esther Weltevrede & Sabine Niederer, Leanne Wijnsma & Froukje Tan, Joeri Woudstra, Sander Veenhof and Simone Niquille.
An exhibition by MOTI, Museum of the Image in Breda (NL)
27.03 to 29.05.2016
Photo: Kristof Vrancken / Z33
From uploading selfies to tracking wellbeing, our desire for privacy in the digital age is at odds with our appetite to share our lives online. As an increasing number of devices we wear and carry connect to the internet, capture our personal information, and exploit our privacy, the V&A invited visitors take a data detox and learn how to subvert their smart technologies.
Photo Credit Gabriel Bertogg: peanutbuttervibes.com/
Gramercy Park,The only private parkland in NYC. When you stay at the Gramercy hotel. you obtain access , peace and tranquility in the middle of the insanity.
This is what Rogers customers will now be faced with when a DNS lookup fails in their browser. This includes subdomains of existing domains. Just another entry on the long list of Rogers' poor decisions.
Rogers has included an option for turning off this "Supported Search Result" page, but it is cookie based. When it is disabled, you will still be accessing a rogers.com URL, for example www20.search.rogers.com/not_found. Users of Firefox or browsers other than Internet Explorer will notice broken images and troubleshooting steps that aren't even applicable.
While some sites are reporting that this is a result of Rogers utilizing DPI (deep packet inspection), it is in reality far less sinister, with Rogers' DNS servers being the culprit:
>nslookup what.the.fuck
Server: dns.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
Address: 64.71.255.198
Name: what.the.fuck
Addresses: 8.15.7.107, 63.251.179.17, 65.200.200.47
>nslookup doesntexist.google.com
Server: dns.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
Address: 64.71.255.198
Name: doesntexist.google.com
Addresses: 8.15.7.107, 63.251.179.17, 65.200.200.47
La scarsa preparazione professionale dell’ imprenditore Italiano si desume facilissimamente da una telefonata, impattandosi con la CENTRALINISTA.
Figura di enorme importanza e filtro fondamentale per chi lavora all’interno delle aziende e che quindi necessariamente dovrebbe essere ACCURATAMENTE selezionata da chi di competenza (?!?), è spesso invece una figura di “riserva” e come tale trattata e conseguentemente catechizzata.
Una centralinista dovrebbe essere perlomeno colta, poliglotta, acuta e riservata, allegra e non sfacciata ma soprattutto dotata di un’esperienza ed un’acutezza tale da farle intuire e valutare, nei primi 3 secondi di conversazione, con CHI sta parlando e COSA rispondere in merito (ovviamente tutto ciò richiederebbe che anche chi seleziona o forma o assume LA CENTRALINISTA, fosse dotato di siffatte doti, caso impossibile quindi.)
NON E’ COSI’! Esempio:
Interlocutore “ Buongiorno Signorina sono XY, cercavo il Sig/Sig.ra XX, può passarmelo/a?”
Centralinista “ Per che cosa?” Oppure “Per qual motivo?” (Raro)
MA CHE COSA TE NE FREGA!
Al massimo, se proprio vuoi essere educata devi dire:
“Posso permettermi di chiedere in merito a cosa?”
Mai sentita tale frase!!!
Interlocutore “ Dovrei inviare una mail al Sig./Sig.ra XX, può darmi la mail?”
Centralinista “ La invii a info@…..(mail generica dell’azienda) provvederò io a girargliela”
Allora, fermo restando che la rete Internet è pubblica, che si vedono e sentono le peggio cose sul web proprio perché è LIBERO ed ancora non esiste una legislazione in merito, MA PERCHE’ DEVO INVIARE UNA MAIL A INFO E FARLA LEGGERE A TE SE LA DEVO INVIARE AD UN ALTRO?
Inoltre: che tipo di preparazione e responsabilità e competenze ha una centralinista per poter decidere se la mia mail deve o può o vuole girarla all’indirizzato?
Non ho ancora trovato nessuna azienda che sbandieri:
“ ABBIAMO TUTTE CENTRALINISTE PREPOSTE E FORMATE AL FILTRO DELLE MAIL: le paghiamo infatti come Dirigenti”
Come possono permettersi coloro che catechizzano in tale distorta maniera queste poverette di pensare che una mail indirizzata ad una persona DEVE essere prima letta e filtrata da un’altra?
Questa è la vera violazione della PRIVACY!!!
Ma non è finita, al primo cenno di aggressività da parte dell’interlocutore la più parte delle sventurate centraliniste, cede le armi, non essendo infatti preparate a reagire verbalmente alla veemenza ma solo a porre paletti senza senso.
Esempio:
Interlocutore “Senta Signorina, sono un/a professionista avvezzo a confrontarmi solo con professionisti e devo inviare una mail riservata, quindi non credo proprio di poterla inviare ad info!
Mi fa la cortesia di darmi la mail PERSONALE del Sig./Sig.ra XX?”
Se il tono è leggermente seccato e con un filo di prosopopea, il gioco è fatto: la malcapitata balbetta qualcosa e poi ti da immediatamente la mail che hai chiesto.
Perché?
Perché non sa con chi sta parlando e NON è in grado di decifrarlo e non lo sarebbe nemmeno se ci fosse la video conferenza!
Questo NON per colpa sua ma perché la disastrosa abitudine a non comunicare più, ad essere sempre sopra le righe nei toni e nei commenti, a voler fare i fenomeni a tutti i costi ci ha portato persino a distorcere i concetti più semplici ed applicabili al vivere secondo le regole della civiltà e del buon senso………………ci ha portato al disastro del pantano economico e umano in cui “sciabattiamo” ogni giorno tentando di non cadere inciampando continuamente…………..
Ieri ho voluto strafare, mettendo alla prova una di queste ragazze, quasi come se dovessi fare un test a campione per una ricerca di dottorato: alla solita risposta”……..invii la mail a info@………….”
Ho chiesto maliziosamente:
“ ……..ma perché Signorina lei è al corrente dell’esistenza di una legge che tutela la privacy sulle email aziendali?”
Panico, gestito con un filo di lecito menefreghismo ed in risposta:
Centralinista “ Guardi……….non so che dire (non dirLE eh?) …io sono un’impiegata………”
Interlocutore “ Lasci stare Sig.na, volevo solo strapparLe una risata. Grazie. “
Altro esempio, ci presentiamo con un titolo: Dottore.
Ed immediatamente il trattamento che ci viene riservato e la risposta che otteniamo è più chiara,
più precisa, più servile……….
Credo che non sia un titolo accademico che dia diritto ad una risposta più o meno educata e chiara, ma veniamo alla n° 1 in assoluto:
Interlocutore “ Buongiorno Signorina sono XY, dovrei inviare una mail al Vs Rep.Marketing, può
darmela?”
Centralinista (con simpatico accento bolognese) “ E’ il ns titolare” (MA VA’?!)
“Mi spiace ma non sono autorizzata a dare la mail e nemmeno a dire come si chiama”
(risatina)
Non è autorizzata a SVELARE il nome e cognome del suo titolare, ma Vi rendete conto?
Siamo nel tunnel del KGB……..
Interlocutore “ Signora mi perdoni ma sa che se io adesso vado in Camera di Commercio e faccio
una visura camerale, mi dicono anche quanto guadagnate?” (tono ironico)
Centralinista “Ha mo’ lo so bene io SSSSignora ma mi hanno detto di dire così (ride anche
Lei!) “ Cosa vuole che ci faccia io?”
Palesemente più acuta la centralinista del titolare!
Al n°2 invece metto questa che è stata la Regina della risposta nebulosa:
Centralinista” Invii la mail a info@…..poi io , quando vedo il mio titolare, che non è mai quasi
qui, gliela faccio vedere e poi forse lui la legge”
Un Mito! La Regina dello strutturalismo dialettico e comunicativo…………..non sono riuscita a raccapezzarmi dalla frase.
Quando avremo capito che un contatto può essere un’opportunità (come dice la mia saggia amica ed imprenditrice avanguardista R.), le Centraliniste reggeranno le Aziende e FINALMENTE i titolari risponderanno al telefono…………….
Tratto dalle note di Gioia Fucchi
Nowadays, we continually share data: a message via WhatsApp, a picture on Instagram, an update on Facebook or an e-mail through Gmail. With whom do we really share this data? And how can we make sure that our personal data stay strictly personal?
This exhibition addresses issues of online privacy and digital surveillance. Next to several historical examples of encrypting, ‘Design my Privacy’ also shows some surprising contemporary strategies by more than 35 young designers and artists to maintain control over our data.
With work by Roel Roscam Abbing, Zineb Benassarou & Jorick De Quaasteniet, Josh Begley, Dennis de Bel, Caitlin Berner & Jana Blom, Heath Bunting, F.A.T., Giada Fiorindi, Front 404, Roos Groothuizen, Arantxa Gonlag & Eva Maria Martinez Rey, Monika Grūzīte, Rafaël Henneberke, Jan Huijben, Daniel C. Howe & Helen Nissenbaum & Vincent Toubiana, Rosa Menkman, Owen Mundy, Naomi Naus, Joyce Overheul, Ruben Pater, Wim Popelier, Freek Rutkens, Vera van de Seyp, Mark Sheppard, Dimitri Tokmetzis & Yuri Veerman, Janne Van Hooff & Christina Yarashevich, Michaele Lakova, Jasper van Loenen, Jeroen van Loon, Esther Weltevrede & Sabine Niederer, Leanne Wijnsma & Froukje Tan, Joeri Woudstra, Sander Veenhof and Simone Niquille.
An exhibition by MOTI, Museum of the Image in Breda (NL)
27.03 to 29.05.2016
Photo: Kristof Vrancken / Z33
Listen: Diva Plavalaguna - Fifth Element (Techno Opera Full)
Bandwidth: HI
2006 © Guilherme Oliveira - Some rights reserved.
Nowadays, we continually share data: a message via WhatsApp, a picture on Instagram, an update on Facebook or an e-mail through Gmail. With whom do we really share this data? And how can we make sure that our personal data stay strictly personal?
This exhibition addresses issues of online privacy and digital surveillance. Next to several historical examples of encrypting, ‘Design my Privacy’ also shows some surprising contemporary strategies by more than 35 young designers and artists to maintain control over our data.
With work by Roel Roscam Abbing, Zineb Benassarou & Jorick De Quaasteniet, Josh Begley, Dennis de Bel, Caitlin Berner & Jana Blom, Heath Bunting, F.A.T., Giada Fiorindi, Front 404, Roos Groothuizen, Arantxa Gonlag & Eva Maria Martinez Rey, Monika Grūzīte, Rafaël Henneberke, Jan Huijben, Daniel C. Howe & Helen Nissenbaum & Vincent Toubiana, Rosa Menkman, Owen Mundy, Naomi Naus, Joyce Overheul, Ruben Pater, Wim Popelier, Freek Rutkens, Vera van de Seyp, Mark Sheppard, Dimitri Tokmetzis & Yuri Veerman, Janne Van Hooff & Christina Yarashevich, Michaele Lakova, Jasper van Loenen, Jeroen van Loon, Esther Weltevrede & Sabine Niederer, Leanne Wijnsma & Froukje Tan, Joeri Woudstra, Sander Veenhof and Simone Niquille.
An exhibition by MOTI, Museum of the Image in Breda (NL)
27.03 to 29.05.2016
Photo: Kristof Vrancken / Z33
Zie www.nationaalprivacydebat.nl voor meer informatie. Foto's zijn een cadeautje van stichting Dat Zou Jij Wel Willen Weten, www.datzoujijwelwillenweten.nl.
Bottom right is the Ballard Locks. Bottom middle is probably Byron Bird and Lucy Phillips (soon to be Bird) kissing on the beach (just before they were wed).
I believe the other photos are members of Byron's extended family.
Album B Page 71
View the entire album of Aunt Lucy from the 1910s.