View allAll Photos Tagged Culpability,
Al fin.......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! espere casi 10 años para esto. La primera vez que vino (1998) no pude ir, pero ahora SIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!!!!!!!!!!!!
Grabando en Coyoacán con Toño Zúñiga y Roberto Hernández, protagonista y director del documental Presunto Culpable
Prohibido :
El alcohol
Hacer Picnic
Jugar paletas...
Playa Apta para el baño
YA CHAAAAAAAAAAO !
kjajksajkkasj esta playa ql es más enana la wea ¬¬ pero igual me gusta :B aqí me sqé la chucha :( por culpa de una roca qe no vi ¬¬
Concentración en Iruñea contra la situación de emergencia de las personas migrantes en la zona de los Balcanes Grecia y Turquía, con la complicidad de los Gobiernos Europeos.
.
Tehelka -India's Independent Weekly News Magazine Page 3 of 9 .
and action is warranted against him? As chief minister, he did not have to physically patrol streets with mobs to be held culpable. He only needed to look away or send a tacit signal for utter mayhem to take over. That itself would have been crime enough. But from the SITs findings, Modi clearly did more than that. .
Despite this, the SIT chairman claims that there is not enough substantiation for him to recommend further action against Modi under the law. The question then is do we need to change our laws? Or change their selective application? How is it that, to name just one case, men like Binayak Sen reputed doctor and human rights champion can be sentenced to life imprisonment on extremely flimsy evidence and on much lighter allegations? .
The decision on the need for a more thorough investigation now rests with the Supreme Court. Senior Supreme Court lawyer and former additional solicitor general of India, Raju Ramachandran, who is the amicus curiae in the case, has already submitted his observations and recommendations on the SIT probe to the apex court on 20 January. Nobody except the court and the SIT knows what Ramachandran has suggested. .
All eyes are therefore set on the Supreme Court Bench comprising three judges DK Jain, P Sathasivam and Aftab Alam which will convene on 3 March and decide the future course of action. .
AMONG MANY civil rights groups and publications, TEHELKA has been at the forefront of the fight for justice for Gujarat riot victims. In October 2007, through a six month-long undercover operation, TEHELKA had got over 60 hours of footage containing unprecedented on-camera confessions of dozens of rioters, VHP and BJP leaders and public prosecutors admitting to their complicity in the riots and exulting about the elaborate conspiracy that had subverted justice in the aftermath of the riots. The TEHELKA sting led to an uproar in civil society. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) asked the Gujarat government to carry out a probe into the TEHELKA video recordings. But the Modi government simply refused. Following this, the CBI was asked to inquire into the sting. The CBI seized the footage and equipment from TEHELKA and sent it to a forensics lab for authentication. The tapes were declared 100 percent genuine. .
No matter what the Supreme Court decides on 3 March, TEHELKA wants to place the full truth of the SIT probe in the public domain and let readers arrive at their own perspective about Modis guilt in the 2002 Gujarat riots. .
Reading the report is a strange experience. Right through, there is a kind of uneasy see-saw between the reports startling findings and its weak, watered-down conclusions. This tension between findings and conclusions tells its own story. .
What follows is some of the key accusations against Modi and the conclusions the SIT report drew on them. .
Narendra Modi did hold a meeting on 27 February 2002. Did he tell his officers to let Hindus vent their anger freely against Muslims? SIT claims there is no conclusive evidence .
The SIT probe against Modi and his government was ordered by the Supreme Court on 27 March 2009 while hearing a complaint filed by Zakia Jafri, widow of slain Congress leader, Ehsan Jafri, who along with dozens of other Muslims was hacked and burned to death during the riots. Zakia had made 32 specific allegations against Modi and other BJP functionaries, bureaucrats and police officers. The most serious allegation was that Modi had given instructions to the then DGP, chief secretary and other senior officials to allow Hindus to freely vent their anger at the Muslims for the Sabarmati carnage. This instruction was allegedly given at a meeting held at the chief ministers bungalow in Gandhinagar on 27 February 2002. .
SIT Chairman Raghavan notes: The inquiry clearly established that such a meeting was in fact held at the chief ministers residence on the night of 27.02.02 after the chief ministers return to Ahmedabad following his visit to Godhra earlier in the day. (Page 3 of chairmans comments) .
According to inquiry officer AK Malhotra, a retired CBI man, the meeting lasted for about half an hour. There were eight confirmed participants: .
1..
Chief Minister Narendra Modi .
.
2..
Acting Chief Secretary Swarna Kanta Verma .
.
3..
Additional Chief Secretary (Home) Ashok Narayan .
.
4. .
DGP K Chakravarthi .
.
5..
Ahmedabad Commissioner of Police PC Pande .
.
6..
Secretary (Home) K Nityanandam .
.
7..
Principal Secretary to CM PK Mishra .
.
8..
Secretary to CM Anil Mukim .
.
.
Before the SIT, two of the senior officers present Swarna Kanta Verma and Ashok Narayan did not refute the allegation that Modi had uttered the shocking words of allowing Hindus to vent their anger. Instead they pleaded loss of memory due to passage of time. (Page 16) Four officers K Chakravarthi, K Nityanandam, PC Pande and PK Mishra have categorically denied that the CM had instructed the police not to control Hindu mobs for a window of time. One officer, Anil Mukim, who is presently on deputation to the Central ministry of commerce, has curiously denied attending this meeting at all. .
.
The selective amnesia by two senior officers coupled with Mukims blatant denial of having even attended the meeting suggests a massive cover-up. This becomes even more believable when seen in the light of the fact that out of the four officers who sided with Modi, two PC Pande and PK Mishra had been rewarded with lucrative post-retirement assignments by the Modi government. After his retirement in 2009, PK Mishra has been posted as chairman of the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission with a fixed tenure for six years. While Pande, after his retirement, has been posted as chairman of Gujarat State Police Housing Corporation. The third, K Nityanandam is still serving in the Modi government and holds the post of managing director of the Gujarat State Police Housing Corporation. Ashok Narayan, who didnt refute the allegation but pleaded memory loss, was also rewarded. After the riots, Narayan was promoted to the post of chief secretary. On 23 May 2003, he was appointed as state vigilance commissioner. He turned 60 on 31 July 2004 but was granted a two-year extension. Subsequently, he was granted four extensions of six months each till 31 December 2008. That adds up to four years of extended benefits granted by the Modi government. .
.
Accordingly, SIT Chairman Raghavan observes the three officers (PC Pande, PK Mishra and Ashok Narayan) had been accommodated in post-retirement jobs, and are therefore not obliged to speak against the chief minister or the state government. (Page 4 of chairmans comments) .
The SIT report has also noted that Justice PB Sawant, a retired Supreme Court judge and Justice Hosbert Suresh, a retired judge of the Bombay High Court, who were members of the Concerned Citizens Tribunal that had inquired into the riots have confirmed that former Gujarat minister for state for revenue, Haren Pandya had deposed before them, implicating Modi for his role in the riots. .
The two retired judges told the SIT that Pandya appeared and deposed before the tribunal on 13 May 2002, on condition of anonymity, that he had attended a meeting on 27 February 2002 night at the residence of Modi in which the latter had made it clear that there should be a backlash from the Hindus on the next day and the police should not come in their way. (Page 18 of the report). .
Pandya was murdered mysteriously in 2003. With his death, there is no way to find out if the meeting he referred to was the same one in which senior bureaucrats had participated or if a separate meeting of BJP leaders had been convened by Modi. But .
file://C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\tehelka_SIT.htm 16/04/2012 .
.
.
.
.
Se muy bien que la comida rapida es basura, pero la como, no por que sea una delicia solo se que lo hago
Borrowers react unpredictably when lenders initiate foreclosure proceedings. A man in Bulgaria demolished his house and delivered it to the bank working to repossess it. Lenders Are More Culpable than Borrowers in the housing debacle. Apportioning blame for the housing bubble has become a... at Man delivers demolished house to repossessing bank
Visit the OC Housing News, and read the OC Housing News blog. Learn why you should use a home guide. Meet the Akason Realty Consulting home guides and housing market analysts, and read our real estate agent testimonials. Discover why you should register with the OC Housing News and how to use the OC Housing News. Utilize the advanced property search, or the MLS map search.
See our special real estate offers: property search guide, housing market reports, home ownership cost guide, guide to rent or own decision, home financing guide, foreclosure 101, short sale guide, how to sell your home without a realtor, The Great Housing Bubble free PDF, 1.5% rebate on new home construction, no cost home sale program, and maximum impact real estate marketing.
Also read Renter News, SD Housing News, Housing Bubble News & Information, Housing Market Forecast US, Housing Market News & Information, Real Estate Ruin, USA Housing News, California Real Estate News, Housing Market News, USA Foreclosure News, Mortgage and Foreclosure News, Mortgage Refinance News, Real Estate Loan News, Debt Default News, Ponzi Debt, Loan Modification and Default News, Mortgage News Clips, and Fay Mortgage News.
Foto natural, porque ellos son asi, espontaneos, naturales, sinceros. Han sido los culpables de que este semestre de mierda haya sido soportable xD
.
""" .--~==-""'"'·~··-~'--.
-.
·;.
' .. ... .
' . .
'· .
30.11 .08 .
Howdo a people respond to such terrible times, terror-stainedtimes?.
3 days and nights of terror. India's worst-ever experience of terrorism till date, claiming close to 200 lives,including those of brave personnel ofthe police,ATS and NSG.The shock, te.
'ars, and anger still shake all of usto our roots. Undoubtedly, this juncture is aturning point, calling for a deep introspection about our preparedness.
as a country to protect ourselves from terrorism. The Indian people are full of burning questions -and won'trest until they get convincing and consistent answers..
The most urgent question is, of course-how on earth could a team of desperados come across the seasto our shores, armed to the teeth, land a stone's throw away from the naval dockyard, enter a prominent city's.
major hotels, which were also distinguished urban landmarks, audaciously, in full view,-without being spotted.
or stopped? How was such a large store of ammunition stocked in strategic spots in Mumbai, incJuding withinhigh-profile hotels, without anyone coming to know? This, apparently in spite of a clear warning by an intelligence.
agency of such an attack less than a week in advance: a warning sounded to all India's intelligence agencies,the Maharashtra Government, the Navy and the coastguards. The warning, apparently,was ignored or played.
down. Clearly, the Indian intelligence machinery was tragically less than thorough, failing to follow its own leads.
and its own information. The political establishment and security mechanism was also incredibly lax. The.
result was that our entire country was taken by surprise by a well-planned. meticulously executed terror plotthat resulted in a terrible crime against humanity. The Maharashtra Government has claimed that the terrorists.
were prepared to ki115000 people-and that it was the courage and sacrifice of the ATS, NSG and police which.
restricted the scale of the terror. While that may be true, and we must of course salute the heroic courage of.
those who risked and gave up lives to save others, this cannot be to the Maharashtra Government's credit. The.
Maharashtra Government, as well as the Central Government and the NSC must answer for why this attack-.
and the resulting loss of precious innocent lives-could not be prevented. We must also remember that such.
audacious terrorist attacks have taken place before-when terrorists rode into the Indian Parliament complex.
-and the Vajpayee Government with L K Advani as Home Minister was just as much at a loss to explain how.
this brazen attack was allowed to happen. Even today, the political establishment 1s at a loss to tell the country.
who master-minded the Parliament Attack. .
Shivraj Patil has resigned as Home Minister: while this is an admission of culpability, it is far from enough:we need a thorough probe into the failure of security and intelligence. and we need to put mechanisms in place.
to prevent the repeat of such failures. .
Unfortunately, at a time when what we need most is people's unity and resolve, our ruling class politicians.
are shaming us by circling around for political capital out of bloodshed -like vultures around dead bodies. If.
people are angered by the inability of Patil and Co to protect us, it is equally revolted by the double standards.
and greed-for-votes ofthe BJP bandwagon. The worst example ofthis was the shameful spectacle of Narendra.
Modi rushing to Mumbai to give one of his inflammatory public speeches near the Oberoi Hotel -even as the.
anti-terror operation raged inside. Modi did not stop there. He had the incredible gall to visit the home ofATS.
chief Hemant Karkare -whom till the very previous day he and his party were vilifying for doing his job andinterrogating terror suspects like Sadhvi Pragya from the Sangh stables. Karkare and his team had beenbranded anti-national and the BJP had launched a national campaign of mud-slinging against them. Beforetrying to bask in the reflected glory of Karkare's martyrdom. Modi and his ilk should at least have taken time toapologise for targeting him! .
And Modi wasn't the only one. Reportedly Sal Thackeray too went to Karkare's home. The previous day,.
Thackeray in Saamna had declared that unless Pragya etc.. were released, the Shiv Sena would make publicthe names and addresses of the ATS team so that they could be .
'socially ostracised.
style violence and vandalism at Karkare's and other ATS members' homes. '-an open threat of Sana-.
There is a classic folk-joke about the man who vigilantly and valiantly kills every ant who passes in front of.
him_ but does not turn around while an elephant rampages from behind him. Maharashtrals political class_.
the Raj and Sal Thackerays and the ruling Congress and NCP-have been too busy beating up the poor andvulnerable North Indian taxi drivers and ~and-cart pushers, too busy rounding up bar girls, to notice·whenarm·ed marauders march in and take Mumbai hostage. They tried to cash in on .
'.
enormous Shivaji statue in th~ sea, and their cadre beat up an ~dit?rMarathi pride' by installing. who commented on the futility of su~~.
gestures: but the basic secunty of sea shores were breached With rrd1culous ease. .
P.T.O. .
·. .
';-: ·;~ ' ·.::..
.' .. . .
. . . .· ~... ' .
.
Nunca reviviré ese doloroso viaje
que se construyó en la fortaleza del descontento,
y luego con su autodestructivo dolor;
hizo Lagrimear la base de mi propia felicidad.
De espesor profundo de la memoria del olvido.
Y los minutos son infinitos de dolor
A veces mi vigor es la culpa de todo el mundo
Al igual que mi corazón frío desgarrador, que hiela mi pecho y mi garganta
Mi corazón frío, me atormenta
Por el vacío de la impotencia, mi egoísmo
En mi corazón, me atormenta
Por las imágenes que no puedo olvidar
Y minutos infinito de dolor
A veces me vigor la culpa a todo el mundo...
(foto tomada de alguna pagina)
perdonen las molestias
Hoy martes 20 de Julio se instaló la audiencia preliminar en contra de Carlos Miranda y otros cinco implicados en el secuestro de la menor Katya Miranda, nieta del acusado, la cual fue privada de libertad y posteriormente encontrada muerta el 4 de abril de 1999.
.
STUDENTS' FEDERATION OF INDIA-ALL INDIA STUDENTS' FEDERATION .
.
CARRY FORWARD UNITED STUDENTS' STRUGGLE FOR BETTER STUDENTS' FACILITIES!! .
INCREASE THE STRENGTH OF SFI-AISF IN JNUSU!! .
.
SFI-AISF CANDIDATES FOR COUNCILLORS IN SSS AND SIS .
.
SSS: ZICO DASGUPTA .
SIS: CHIRANTAN KUMAR .
Friends! 18/04/07 The student movement in our campus is faced with immense challenges in the coming one year. The present JNUSU council has the responsibility of ensuring that all the challenges facing the students are resolved successfully. The leadership of JNUSU to buiJd a sustained and united student movement would crucially affect the progressive democratic character of our campus in the coming days. From the very first day itself SFI-AISF representatives in the JNUSU have made all efforts to forge the broadest possible unity of students on these issues. Be it the issue of 27% OBC reservations and 54% Seat increase, struggle for more scholarships, formulation of 11 th plan proposals in a democratic and transparent manner or other important demands like recognizing Allemiyat-Fazeelat degrees for admissions to BA 1st year and ensuring transparency in admission process the SFI-AISF representatives have taken the lead in mobilizing students against the insensitive administration in various protest actions over this period. Not only have these efforts been successful in pressurizing the administration to concede to many of our important demands like implementatjon of 27%0BC reservation in one go, formation of a committee to strengthen the EOO, ratification of the rules and procedures of the GSCASH etc. but they have also helped In forging a broader unity of students on many issues which has strengthened our cause. The open meetings called by the JNUSU president on the issue of reservation were an initiative in this direction only. The JNUSU President also called for an All Party Convention against the Supreme Court judgement staying OBC reservation. It were the SFI AISF representatives in the council who took the initiative of calling an open meeting of students on the issue of depiction of women in cultural programmes in our hostel nights following complaints by a large number of girl students regarding a performance in a cultural night in a particular hostel. Shamefully nobody from the AISA or their representatives in the JNUSU part1cipated in that meeting barring a token presence by the JNUSU VP for a few minutes. .
It is this vision of the JNUSU, aimed at forging the broadest possible student unity, which the infantile ultras of the AISA do not have For them the JNUSU platform is yet another means for attacking the SFI-AISF and extracting their sectarian polit1cal gains. Since the last elections~ the JNUSU General Secretary has indulged in the worst forms of sectarian politics, while the JNUSU VP has been totaJiy inactive in all major issues. The JNUSU Gen Secy has not even allowed council meetings to take place or let the electJon of conveners and GSCASH representative happen till now. The inactivity and sectarian politics of the AISA within the JNUSU is exposed from the following: .
.
The JNUSU Gen. Secy., called separate demonstration on the Nithari issue, sabotaged the protest march on students' issues on 14th March. .
.
.
The AISA representatives in JNUSU did not even bother to call for a protest demo during the Academic Council meeting or report the proceedings of the meeting to the student community. .
.
.
The AISA was completely silent on the issue of ratification of the rules and procedures of GSCASH, constitution of a committee for strengthening Equal Opportunity Office or increasing the amount under Earn·As·You-Learn scheme. .
.
.
The AISA has been completely silent against the YFEs black flag demonstration against Arjun Singh or the manhandling of Swami Agnivesh and Udit Raj during a programme In JNU. .
.
.
Neither the AISA nor their JNUSU representatives have taken any position on the YFE's obnoxious attacks on the JNUSU president for his commitment to the cause of 27% OBC reservations and seat Increase. .
.
.
While the AISA has decided to conveniently neglect all these genuine issues and questions being raised by the SFI·AISF they are revoking the issue of Nandigram again and again to hide their utter inactivity and non-seriousness on students' issues. As far as the issue of Nandigram is concerned, the SFI-AISF would like to state the following: .
On Nandigram: 14 people have died in Nandigram due to the confrontation between the police and violent agitators. One person (out of 14) died because a bomb that he was trying to throw at the police burst in his hands. The police firing is highly unfortunate and deplorable because poor people have lost their lives. It is particularly disturbing because it has happened under the Left Front Government, which Is committed to the cause of the working people, particularly the rural poor. The Left Front Government in West Bengal must take immediate steps to ensure the restoration of peace and normalcy In Nandlgram. The Left Front Government must also ensure that such incidents of police firing do not occur in future. .
The police firing on 141h March is regrettable, but the culpability of the opposition parties in West Bengal, namely the Trinamool Congress! the BJP, the Congress, SUCI and naxalites cannot be overlooked. The issue of land acquisition had been settled when the Chief Minister of West Bengal announced on 3rd February 2007 that no land would be acquired in Nandigram. Several all-Party meetings were convened both at the district as well as the state level to discuss and resolve the issue. The opposition deliberately stayed away, because they wanted the situation to precipitate. .
Over 3500 Left sympathisersl all poor villagers, have been staying in makeshift relief camps over the past two and a half months since they were forcibly evicted from the villages. The area was declared out of bounds for the district administration and all communication links and roads were cut off. This was surely not a democratic form of protest. Moreover, the demand on the basis of which the protest .
.
.
.