View allAll Photos Tagged Culpability,
Dejarte no fue facil para que hoy vuelvas a mi con cara de inocente y esa voz de yo no fui Mira que adentro mio hay un deseo de venganza de hacer pagar tus culpas
y dejarte sin fianza Pensar que ya no puedo ni adorarte como amtes por que estoy ocupada de enculparte Quisiera encerrarte y no dejarte salir mas mostrarle a los demas todo el dolor que me causas CULPABLE, SOS EL UNICO, CULPABLE
YO TE ACUSO Y TE MALDIGO TE DESTIERRO DE MI ALMA Y MI CORAZON
Voy a crucificarte y quitarte la razon ponerte frente a frente con toda la procesion Toda esa gente muda que no tiene corazon hoy para mi estas muerto, muerto en vida y sin mi amor Quemandome en silencio entre el odio y el rencor floriendo de una causa
de mil hojas de dolor Pase noches enteras preparando mi venganza y ahora es el momento de tomarme la revancha CULPABLE... Carga tu cruz lleva el dolor
hasta el final muerde el rencor
A Magistrates’ Court in Makurdi, on Thursday ordered that a 27- year old farmer, Terhumba Roland, who allegedly killed a man, be remanded in a correction facility, pending legal advice. Magistrate Ajuma Igama, did not take the plea of Roland, for want of jurisdiction. Igama ordered the police to send a copy of the case […]
nnn.com.ng/2019/09/05/court-remands-farmer-for-alleged-cu...
No lo voy a luchar o negar, si tenes una camara digital tarde o temprano vas a empezar a sacarte fotos haciendote el modelo.
Es la maldicion de la camara digital, sumado por narcismo que todos llevamos inconscientemente.
Humor by Welele – Tu web de humor, memes, gifs, vídeos
No es por nada pero parecen totaaaaalmente culpables
via humor24h.es/ bit.ly/1zbdOp3
Pics taken at Salon Pueyrredon. Second day of Kustom Rock Festival. Niños Enfermos, Culpables Directos, Horror Vendetta & Burning Fingers
.
case, to Delhi and arrange for his stay. `Since I was not knowing the man, I suspected this.
man is not Kashmiri, as he did not speak Kashmiri,' wrote Afzal. The contents of this letter.
were never put on record before the court, as pointed out by Nandita Haksar, his lawyer later.
and a human rights activist..
.
The story gets worse. About a year before the Parliament attack, Afzal was in custody of the.
J&K Police, having been detained at an STF camp for his links with Ghazi Baba. But despite.
this piece of advance intelligence that he allegedly had links with the LeT, the STF set him.
free unconditionally. Why?.
.
According to DSP Davinder Singh, who admitted having tortured Afzal during his detention,.
"Afzal was very close to Ghazi Baba. Do you know who Ghazi Baba was? There was great.
terror [of] him in the Valley. It took us six years to neutralise him. So we got [Afzal] picked.
up. We were asked to find out about his links with Ghazi Baba, which he refused to confirm..
Finally, I handed him over to my senior officer. Subsequently, he was released the next day.".
.
The DSP later told a news channel that he had to release Afzal under the pressure of a senior.
officer, Ashaq Hussain Bukhari. When I contacted Bukhari, he had only one response to all.
my queries: "I do not remember.".
.
But Afzal did remember, and he wrote his lawyer Sushil Kumar details of the episode. Afzal.
alleged that his family secured his release by paying a Rs 1 lakh bribe. Tabassum, his wife,.
has explained how the deal was struck. "When I went to meet Afzal with family, he started.
crying on meeting [our son] Ghalib," she told me, "He could not move his hands; he was.
badly beaten. After I came back home, I received a call from the STF demanding money to.
release Afzal. I had to sell my marriage jewellery. [But] the money fell short. Then I took Rs.
10,000 each from my uncle and brother-in-law.".
.
If the allegations against Afzal Guru are true, then the J&K Police's conduct assumes serious.
proportions. If Afzal was involved in terror activities at the time, either Davinder Singh or.
Bukhari was guilty of gross dereliction of duty. If a bribe was taken to release him, then it.
compounds the culpability of a force that could perhaps have foiled the Parliament attack..
.
During his trial, Afzal was trying to point out that he had been in touch with the J&K Police's.
STF, but the nature of this association was never investigated by the Special Cell. Professor.
Mukherji points out that the prosecution did not find any merit in Afzal's statement-- made.
under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure--that linked him to Davinder Singh,.
the STF and a possible plot to attack Parliament. But after the Supreme Court rejected the.
prosecution's theory based on Afzal's confession, the latter's 313 statement was the only.
basis left on which his role (if any) in events that led to the attack could be probed..
.
Yet, Davinder Singh was mentioned neither in the FIR nor chargesheet, nor was the police.
officer made a witness in the case. He did not figure in the trials..
.
+++.
.
Soon after the attack, another significant development was brushed aside by the J&K Police..
After the names of the five killed assailants were made public, the Thane Police sought a.
clarification. SM Shangari, then Police Commissioner of Thane, held a press briefing to state.
that the Thane Police had in December 2001 arrested four LeT operatives, and one of them.
..
.
, .
j' . ~ "~~·-... ... .
In Delhi we saw our share of the crude and shameless attempts to reap votes from blood and tears-theBJP's ads in the papers calling to 'fight terror, vote BJP.' The scale of the terror spectacle in Mumbai, the sheer.
pain and loss-exposes the puniness of political vision of the Modis, Advanis and Thackerays..
We must also introspect about why ~ndia is becoming more and more vulnerable to the international virus.
of terrorism. Of course, India has its own myriad home-grown terrorisms, each calling for a decisive politicalresolution. But as American, Israeli and British guests are singled out in terror attacks on Indian soil, we are.
forced to face the fact that our foreign policy-shackling usto a globally unjust and unpopular nexus of imperialist.
wars and occupation-is making us (like our neighbour Pakistan) a target for global terrorism. We need, as a.
people, to introspect and ask ourselves-doesn't India have enough problems of its own to cope with? Do we.
need to expose ourpeople to the added threat of being 'partners' of imperialists, war-mongers and occupiers?The most crucial question is: can we allow callous politicos to manipulate our grief and anger, to cover up.
their own culpability? .
The ABVP, in its leaflet dated 28-11-08, has bayed for India to wage war and wreak a campaign of.
destabilisation and fragmentation on Pakistan. The UPA Government also is toying with the idea of closing.
down diplomatic dialogue with and eve flights to Pakistan. Yes, pulverising Pakistan may offer some satisfyingsense of 'revenge': but will it give us lasting peace and freedom from terror? Surely we cannot afford to forgetthat Pakistan too has, in recent times, has been a repeated target for massive acts ofterrorism. The LaI Masjid.
siege in top hotels. .
seige and the Marriot Hotel blasts are fresh in our memory, eerily similar to the Mumbai three-day terrorist .
The BJP and ABVP have been clamouring for a revival of POTA and MCOCA-style draconian anti-terror.
laws. The question that stares us in the face is: did MCOCA help Maharashtra prevent the latest terror strike inMumbai? In spite of POTA in the hands of a BJP-NDA Government, why is it that the real identity of theperpetrators of Parliament Attack remains shrouded in mystery? Why did POTA fail to prevent Akshardhamblasts, also in BJP's own tenure? Was it a lack of POTA that made the Vajpayee Government hand over.
terrorists in exchange for Kandahar hostages? POTA or MCOCA are no help for gaping holes in intelligence.
and security. .
TheABVP, like its parents in BJP and RSS, has no real agenda offighting terrorism. Behind the smokescreenof their anti-terrorist double-speak, their real aim is to further their communal fascist agenda. They speak offragmenting Pakistan: actually, they and their cadre are busy fragmenting India on communal and regionallines. Hemant Karkare had boldly exposed the Sangh Parivar's role in indulging in terrorism in order to blameit on Muslims and garner votes for the BJP. Those who shared a dais with terrorists yesterday and vilified.
Karkare are today trying to curry public favour by shedding crocodile tears for Karkare..
The ABVP'.
s recipe for countering terror is actually nothing but the Hitler-style blueprint that the terrorist.
Abhinav Bharat also aimed for. Their leaflet brands Muslim localities as 'little Pakistans' and calls for increased.
.
police surveillance on each Muslim home: the equivalent of the 'Star of David' that Hitler placed to mark Jewish.
homes. The next step forthe ABVP will be to demand that Muslims and Christians be locked away and finished.
.
off in concentration camps like those in which Hitler killed offthe Jews..
We must remain firm in our resolve to protect our people from the deadly viruses ofterrorism, communalism.
and regional chauvinism.A robust people's democracy is the only foundation for such a fight against the many.
colours of terrorism that threaten us today. We must firmly rebuff those forces who seek to reap a political.
harvest from each terrorist attack-and even go to the extent of staging such attacks themselves. What we.
need is determined resolve, not blind jingoism and communal hatred whipped up by vested political interests..
AISA salutes all those whose lives were lost in the past few days of terror -in particular the brave soulswho gave up their own lives to keep people safe. .
Vishal, Jt. Secy, AISA, JNU .
Sucheta De, Gen. Secy AISA, JNU .
.
.
Pics taken at Salon Pueyrredon. Second day of Kustom Rock Festival. Niños Enfermos, Culpables Directos, Horror Vendetta & Burning Fingers
Pics taken at Salon Pueyrredon. Second day of Kustom Rock Festival. Niños Enfermos, Culpables Directos, Horror Vendetta & Burning Fingers
.
10.4.12 .
Bihar Police and Govt Protected Rapist BJP MLA, .
Rupam Pathak Dared to Fight Back: .
.
Why Is Rupam Sentenced for Life .
.
While Her Rapists and Their Protectors Go Free? .
A Special CBI Court today passed a life sentence on Bihar school teacher Rupam Pathak, holding her guilty of culpable homicide of Bihars Purnea MLA from BJP Raj Kishor Kesri. This sentence is a gross miscarriage of justice, exposing the gender bias in a range of institutions and the hollowness of the Bihar Governments claims of empowerment of women. .
The Bihar CM was forced to order a CBI enquiry into the Rupam Pathak case precisely because of public protests against the Bihar Governments attempts to smear Rupam Pathaks character and suppress the history of her complaints of rape and sexual harassment against the BJP MLA Kesri and his aide BN Rai. But the CBI enquiry has merely probed the killing of Kesri, and has failed to investigate Rupam Pathaks complaint of sexual harassment. Not only that, BN Rai was not even arrested allowing him to be free to influence and threaten witnesses. While rape-accused BN Rai remained free, Rupam Pathak herself was denied bail, and prevented from having any opportunity to clear her name! .
What led a young school teacher to publicly stab an MLA of a ruling party, in full view, in his own home? Rupams long-standing complaint of rape and sexual harassment by Kesri and his aide BN Rai had been ignored by the Bihar police and ruling political establishment of which Kesri was a powerful and pampered leader. Seeing no hope of justice, Rupam, a 35-year old school teacher, was pushed to take the desperate step of attacking Kesri in his own house. .
After the incident, Deputy CM of Bihar, Sushil Kumar Modi, was quick to declare that Rupam Pathak was a blackmailer and murderess, while Kesri was a man of pure character and a hero of the 1974 movement. Opposition leaders like Laloo Prasad too echoed the same. But when AIPWA and other womens groups in Bihar took up the matter, they found that Rupam Pathak had accused the MLA and his aide BN Rai of rape and sexual harassment some months before the killing, but had mysteriously withdrawn her case on the eve of the Assembly elections. What pressures forced her to do so? The CBI has failed to investigate these questions, and has also ignored Rupams complaint against BN Rai. .
The Rupam verdict also raises other questions. We have, time and again, come across cases where killings by men get relatively lenient sentences on the ground that these are crimes of passion. Stabbing cases in street brawls resulting in deaths usually carry light sentences. Why, then, has Rupam been awarded an extremely harsh life sentence, completely failing to take into account the extreme provocation and desperation she felt, due to the faint prospect of any justice against her powerful rapists and sexual harassers? Is this not an instance of blatant gender bias? .
In the landmark Kiranjit Ahluwalia case of London, a woman victim of domestic violence took her husbands life, and received a harsh life sentence. But eventually, thanks to the efforts of womens groups, the sentence was relaxed, and domestic violence was recognised in future as an instance of extreme provocation. The Rupam Pathak case ought to be a similar instance in Indian jurisprudence, where acts of desperate violence by women who have been subjected to sexual violence ought to be seen as the result of the failure of our systems to provide a credible prospect of justice for women in cases of sexual violence. This ought to hold true specially in cases of repeated and prolonged sexual abuse or harassment, where attempts to secure justice through the police have been subverted or crushed. .
Even now, why is it that the rulers of Bihar, the police, as well as even the CBI and the court, are so eager to consign Rupam to jail, at the same time suppressing her accusations of rape and sexual harassment because they threaten the image of the ruling political alliance? .
We must demand bail and justice for Rupam Pathak, and a re-investigation by the CBI into the whole case, especially into Rupam Pathaks complaints of sexual violence, and the immediate arrest of BN Rai. .
.
.
Join Protest Demonstration .
(by AIPWA) .
Against Life Sentence for Rupam Pathak .
Who Dared to Take On Sexual Harassment and Exploitation by .
Bihar BJP MLA Rajkishor Kesri and His Aide BN Rai .
.
.
.
Jantar Mantar 11 April, Wednesday, 12.30 PM .
Piyush, Vice-President, AISA, JNU Omprasad, Jt.Secy., AISA,JNU .
.
.
.
When corporations subvert democracy .
By Gopal Krishna .
July 2010 --Liberation --The June 7 verdict by the Bhopal court sets a precedent for the worst of corporate crimes --and even nuclear disasters too --to be treated like a traffic accident. Bhopals verdict was constrained because of the order of Justice Ahmadi Bench of the Supreme Court dated September 13, 1996, in which the charges against Indian officials of Union Carbide India Limited (the subsidiary majority owned by Union Carbide Corporation) were diluted. Since February 2001, the culpability lies with the Dow Chemical Company, which took over Union Carbide Corporation USA. .
All the seven convicted in the Bhopal gas tragedy have been sentenced to two years in jail and a fine of Rs1 lakh (100,000) each and got bail for a surety of Rs 25,000 each. Union Carbides subsidiary in India has been found guilty and fined to the order of Rs500,000 for the industrial disaster. All the officials accused in the Bhopal catastrophe, including Keshub Mahindra, the former chair of Union Carbide India Ltd and current chair of Mahindra & Mahindra Company, have been let off lightly for the disaster that happened during his tenure. They were found guilty under Sections 304-A (causing death by negligence), 336, 337 and 338 (gross negligence) of the Indian Penal Code instead of 304-II (culpable homicide not amounting to murder). .
What is quite clear from the verdict is that generations to come will view Supreme Courts act of reducing the charge against Union Carbide Corporation officials in 1996 from manslaughter (which is punishable with imprisonment up to 10 years) to death caused by a rash or negligent act (carrying a maximum penalty of two years) with deep suspicion that belittles its moral stature. .
As early as in 1973, Carbide CEO Warren Anderson was aware of the flaws of the Bhopal plant untested technology, faulty design and its unsafe location and operation. In December 1987, the Central Bureau of Investigation filed criminal charges of culpable homicide against 10 officials, including Union Carbide Companys president Warren Anderson. Why was this charge diluted? Anderson was the chairperson and CEO of Union Carbide Company when the lethal methyl isocyanate (MIC) leaked from a pesticide plant of the companys Indian subsidiary on December 2-3, 1984. Anderson was arrested and then released on bail by the Madhya Pradesh police on December 7, 1984, and left for US even as victims continued to suffer because of the industrial disaster. Anderson, who lives in New York, served as Union Carbide CEO until his 1986 retirement. .
In 1992, Anderson was declared a fugitive by the Bhopal court for failing to appear for hearings in a case of culpable homicide after his case was separated from the case in which eight people employed by Union Carbide were convicted. In July 2009, an arrest warrant was issued for him. The government of India took some 19 years to move a formal request for his extradition in May 2003 but the US rejected Indias request for the extradition of Anderson in June 2004 saying the request did not meet requirements of certain provisions of the bilateral extradition treaty. .
US double standards .
.
.
.