View allAll Photos Tagged Admission_Process
Imagine your name Turning into An International
Designer Label.
Now make it a Reality, Join #IIFD #Chandigarh
Get FREE COUNSELLING. For #Admission_Process Call @+919041766699 OR Visit @ iifd.in/
.
Find us on Map-
Chandigarh:- g.page/IIFD-Chandigarh
Mohali:- g.page/IIFDMohaliCampus
#IIFD_CHANDIGARH #Fashion #Designing
.
Uphold the Model of Pro-Student, Pro-People JNUSU! 12.9.12 .
The upcoming JNUSU elections will be held at a cruci~juncture for the student community. Across tre .
countty, the very idea ofinclusive education and democratic campuses is being scuttled. IfSpecialEconomic .
Zones are beilig created where the laws ofthe land (including labour and environmentallav;s) will not be applicable, in .
the education sector~ the UPA is hell-bent on creating new educational institutions through EducationalTribunal Bill, .
Innovation Universities BiU, and the Foreign University Billwhere existing .rules and regulations on social justice .
and inclusion will be conspicuous by their absence. Conuption, corporate land gnib and forcible displacement is going .
hand and in haii~ with corporate takeover ofthe education sector and the scuttling ofall voices ofdissent. Right next .
door to JNU.,'in Delhi University and Jamia, fee hikes and a spate ofcommercialisation moves are on. And it in this .
scenario ofan overall assault on student rights that JNUSU has actually expanded the horizons ofstudent .
rights, social inclusion and democratisation. The tenure oflast JNUSU was a tenure ofstruggle, achievements and .
significant advances. In a span ofvery few months JNUSU has led and fought for a socially inclusi\e, gender just and .
.
student friendly can1pus. .
At a time vvhen concerted efforts are being made to scuttle social inclusion in higher educational institutions, JNUSU has defeated all administrative machinations to deny the systematic discrimination in the viva voce. Th~ viva committee has been forced to accept JNUSU's analysis and conclusions about serious disparity in Viva marks. The report is now in various Centres for discussions to be submitted to the next .
Academic Council. .
We have aJNUSU whjch has forced the administration to agree in principle that the MCM scholarship .
will be enhanced on receipt of 12th plan fund and agreed in principle to expand the time period ofthe non-net UGC fellowship. .
JNUSU has forced the administration to democratise hostel allotment rules ensuring hostels ro SC ~ St .
.PH students within a day ofapplying and simultaneous allotment to General and OBC students and open new dormitories. .
.
After JNUSU,s intervention, the construction of7 new hostels has been proposed. .
.
.
Institutionalizing efforts to make JNU a Barrier-Free Campus for PHIVH Students and increase ofreader 'sl escort :S allowance toRs 2000 per month. .
.
.
J}fUSU's vigilance in the admission process ensured the release of second lists this year for fulfilling mandated reservation. .
.
.
At a time when people in power -from principals ofcolleges and universities, to police officers -are making .:.. horrifieally obnoxious gender-insensitive statements, JNUSU has forced the JNU administration to take an institutional responsibility to· counter patriarchal stereotypes in JNU by conducting Mandatory Gender Sensitiz-ation and Orientation Programmes, for the first time in JNU's history in every school. .
.
.
JNUSLI has ensured starting ofTatkal facility in JNU's railway reservation counter. .
.
.
At a time when fee hikes are the order ofthe day, JNUSU has pushed back user charges and commercialisation 3t moves in Yamuna and Mahanadi. .
.
.
:J .
New courses have been introduced in SIS, the draconian anti-student compulsory attendance policy 11' .
in SLL&CS was defeated by JNUSU in the school BoS, and the issue of integrated BAIMA in .
ar .
' .
SLL&CS was reopened against its recent dismantling. . .
) .
s.
.
For the first time in JNU, the JNUSU has initiated a move to address the language barrier through institutionalised translations ofbasic texts. .
.
.
After a very long period, a concerted effort was undertaken to improve library facilities. Around3,700 books m were purchased after 3 years, and renovation, digitisation, improved cataloguing and networking·,vith centre libraries too place. .
.
.
At a tiine when campus democracy is under assault, JNUSU has forged a national platform against the anti-student Lyngdoh recommendations. . 1( .
These and several other initiatives have been taken up by the JNUSU. In the days to come too, it is important to elect a JNUSU which has the vision, and the fighting spirit to in1agine and implement progrssive policy-level changes for social inclusion and greater democratisation and fighting for the daily fel!_ needs ofthe .
P.T.( >..
student community. .
.
Avail a simple and hassle-free admission process with the help of Proctur as well as handle your admission process in a quick and secure manner. For more, visit us - proctur.com/
.
.
.
-.
.
YOUTH FOR EQUALITY 11.01.2012 .
~012 is a leap year in general. But, for JNU it's a great leap forward, particularly, in the context of a strong possibifity of having JNUSU election in this year, after a long hiatus offour years since 2007. Thanks to the demagogy of our phoney revolutionary comrades, in those democratically barren years JNU has lost 3 JNUSO. elections, leading to delcgitimacy of all the student bodies. All these years YFES has been arguing I .
for tlre JNUSU elections as per tire Lyngdoh Committee Recommendations so that the student community .
11.
shall not get deprived ofa democratically elected JNUSU. But all our efforts went in vein as the professional politikers from left to right with a spineless centre were hand in glove to protect their parasitic careerist selfish interest under the fayade ofopposing Lyngdoh. The final acceptance of Lyngdoh by the same very forces is not n matter of change of their heart but rather due to the apprehension that they may be ageing enough to be good for anything. Nevertheless, YFES, we]comes the final acceptance of Lyngdoh by all the parties concerned except some MTV-Type re(S)olutionary comrades whose entertainment value has been widely acclaimed. That there is a near unanimity w.r.t the acceptance ofLyngdoh is a vindication of .
YFES' infom1ed and consistent pro-Lyngdoh position. .
Had YFES' position been accepted, the student community would not only have elected JNUSU as their representative,would also have a strong case for approaching the hon'ble Supreme Court for certain relaxations based on our concrete experiences after two years and so on. The provision for the review ofLCR is an inbuilt mechanism as is clearly demonstrated by the art. 6.1.5 ofLyngdob: .
"All institutions must conduct a review ofthe student representation mechanism. The first review may be conducted after a period of2 years ofthe implementation ofthe mechanism detailed above, and the second review may be conducted after the 3rd or the 4th year of implementation. The primary objective ofthese\ reviews will be to ascertain the success ofthe representation and election mechanism in each individual .
institution, so as to dedde whether or not to implement a full-fledged election structure. Needless to say ~ .
these revie·ws will be based on a consideration ofthe views and suggestions of all stakeholders, such as .
students, faculty, administrarion, student bodies, andparenrs. ·· .
.
9 .
Moreover, even if we leave these past narratives apart, there are certain moot questions that must be seriously engaged with. Firstly, which semester should be treated as the new academic session for the c0nduct of JNUSU elections, the present "winter semester" or "the forthcoming monsoon semester?" This is because article 6.4.2 clearly states that: .
"It is further recommended that elections be held on a yearly basis and that the same should be held betv.,.een 6 to 8 weeksfrom the date of commencement ofthe academic session. " .
In the above light there are just two possibilities: .
A. Conduct the JNUSU elections in the "Monsoon Semester" so that we have continuity with the old practice of having JNUSU elections after the admission process and the arrival of new students. .
B. Go for the JNUSU elections in the present "winter semester" and accept the rescheduUng of JNUSU elections in the "winter semester" for ever. This is because art. 6.4.2 clearly states that elections would be on a "yearly basis". Hence, if we go for JNUSU elections in the winter semester for the present then automatically we would be changing the old practice ofhaving JNUSU elections in the "monsoon semester". There is no way of having a "mid-yearly election" as that would be legally untenable and non-permissible as .
per LCR. .
Sec?ndly, we must be pragmatic w.r.t the possibilities of having a JNUSU election in the present "winter .
r .
semester" as there are certain structural and procedural preconclitiona/ities that must be fulfilled before we may proceed for the same. For instance, as per art. 6.8, 6.8.1 und 6.8.2, there has to be a "Grievance .
~ .
Pe Tfi 0.
1 ~ .
.
.
.
. . .
..
.. .. . " .
.,..
-, J -.
~· .
~' .
.
.
.
The expert will help you to choose the ideal institution among the top universities study abroad and will also guide you through the admission process. Visit here: bit.ly/31ufdD0
.
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY STUDENTS UNION.
NEW DELHI-110067.
Phones: 2671 7676, 2671 7557, 2670 4741 .
Press Release .
JNUSU Holds Press Conference 23/02/2009.
against JNU administration's refusal to roll back Prospectus Fee Hike and its eyewash proposal to ''waive on 23 Feb Monday at 3.00pm at JNUSU Office in JNU.
prospectus fee for applicants from BPL families".
.
students' concerns for social justice, but also a cruel joke at the poverty of the millions of Indians for "It is an EMPTY promise as it has NO actual beneficiary. The announcement is an insult not just to the whom life is a daily fight for survival"-said Sandeep..
.
sale of prospectus. .
JNUSU has decided to intensify the ongoing struggle by various protest actions including stopping the.
For the past three weeks, the entire JNU student community has been engaged in a struggle against the JNU .
the JNU prospectus. .
administration's moves to commercialize services and spaces on the campus, and against a sharp hike in the fees for.
While the administration backtracked on some of its commercialization moves, however, on the important issue of .
the sharp 67°/o increase in the cost of the JNU prospectus, the administration refused to rollback the rise, .
below poverty line (BPL) families would get the prospectus free of cost"..
This sudden and ill thought-out proposal has caused deep resentment in the JNU community and JNU students will .
instead to maintain pretence of being "pro-poor", it all of a sudden introduced a clause that "applicants fromfight against this move..
It is in this context, JNUSU is held a Press Conference at the JNUSU office on Monday, 23 Feb., at 3.00pm.
the administration will now "provide the JNU prospectus free ofcost for students from BPL families". .
It is an EMPTY promise as it has NO actual taker. .
JNU YC insulted the intelligence and rationality ofthe entire JNU community by announcing with great fanfare that .
line". According to the government of India, it simply means that one is not even able to procure food JNUSU would like to remind our economist VC what it means to be classified as being "below the povertyequivalent to 2200 calories per dav, medically enough to prevent death. For those whom the government reluctantly accords the status of BPL, life is a continuous struggle for survival, where one is never sure when .
the next square meal is forthcoming. When one is not even able to get enough food to stay alive, even .
minimum needs of education, housing, health services, clothing, and other basic necessities are merely .
dreams. How does JNU expect such people who live a subsistence existence on the margins ofsociety to.
.
be able to avail of higher education facilities in one of the most expensive metropolises in the country?.
.
prospectus fees have inflicted. Firstly, the fees hike has damaged the basic ethical premise that .
The BPL waiver simply cannot compensate or counterbalance the damage that the increaseduniversities or admission processes cannot be run like commercial and profiteering ventures. Secondly, 1through higher prices, it has discouraged and actually squeezed out those in the social ladder who are struggling against odds to begin to equip themselves with an education, and aspire to come for higher .
education..
JNU VC does not have any response to address these two concerns with his proposal..
backtrack on its crass commercialization.
poor". But it is a shocking and farcical face-saving tactics. It is shameful that the YC ofa progressive institution like While continuous student pressure, mobilization, and our sound logic have forced the administration to .
moves, it sought to find an escape by putting on a garb of being "pro-also the poverty of the millions ofIndians for whom life is a daily fight for survival. JNU, and that too an economist, should insult .not just our concerns for social justice and a democratic ethos, but.
stopping the sale of prospectus. .
In the face of this JNUSU has decided to intensify the ongoing struggle by .various protest actions including .
Sdl-Sandeep Singh,President, JNUSU.
J I vCI,.J., J l'l U ;:) U .
l .
+~~ ' .
i: ~.
: ...
:..:..:-I; ~1' ' .;;·....;...:. y_:: ,....~~. .t. !·n.-r '" ,.f..· C r~...., ~ ; :...':: IIC. "i· ',<.'·. . ''· ..... -.
::r-,;:--~~ ,;; ;,.(:...~·~--·.:·:~~· :.::: ;i:~j:.:~;. ..:.;:~:-.,:,,..;:...:: C..! '··"'~"""'-' ~·· :.t.'c ...-"·'~..-__ '" =-. ··· ...-'·... ·-· ~·; ..._. ·--· .
-...,. ""'=-""'""~.
., .
.
.
Remember How SFI Undermined the Cut-Off Struggle for OBC Reservation? They Are Back At It Again With Similar Disruptive Tactics: Weakening the Struggle for Reduction of Viva Marks and Strengthening the Administration .
Following the Protest Demo of 27th July and persistent intervention by JNUSU, an elaborate second list has come out. This is not just an additional list to fill the seats left vacant by those who did not join, but also to ensure that the shortfall in mandated reservations is fulfilled by incorporating various suggestions made by the JNUSU. In the 1st list, there had been a total deficit of 71 OBC seats, 47 SC seats, 20 ST seats and 17 PH seats (in all centres and programmes combined). The 2nd List offers admission to 142-UR, 56-SC, 23-ST, 74-OBC and 10-PH candidates in BA/MA, and to 14-UR, 7-SC, 14-ST, 15-OBC, and 2-PH candidates in M.Phil. .
The second list that has been published not only serves the purpose of fulfilling the vacant seats after the admission process based on the first list, but also offers additional seats over and above the first list to fulfil reservation. However, the struggle is far from over. Another major challenge -of reduction of weightage of viva marks to do away with resulting disparities -continues to remain. .
At this juncture, it is extremely unfortunate that a 'Protest March' has been called today by a JNUSU councillor from SFI-JNU, claiming that AISA-led JNUSU is sleeping on the issue of fulfilment of reservations and reduction of viva weightage. The DSU (SFI's seasonal cohort) too has announced that it will join this protest. .
.
Who Has Been Sleeping on Social Inclusion? Let us consider the facts on hand: AISA-led JNUSU's Initiatives Towards Fulfilment of Seats: .
.
As soon as the admission list was published on 24th of July, the JNUSU immediately informed the students about the non-fulfilment of reservation and gave a letter to the administration regarding the same on the very next day i.e. 25th of July. .
.
.
On 27th of July, the JNUSU mobilised the students for a protest demonstration in front of ad block where the demands for fulfilment of mandated reservation and expediting the process of the committee for reviewing the weightage of viva-voce were conveyed to the administration. During the protest JNUSU had demanded certain mechanisms to be applied to fulfil reservation. .
.
.
It was only after JNUSUs intervention that the administration agreed to bring out a fresh list of candidates for the unfulfilled seats in different centres. On 3rd and 4th of August fresh lists have come out. .
.
.
.
The Long Struggle for Reduction in Weightage of Viva Marks .
For the past few months, the student community has been witnessing a protracted struggle to reduce the weightage of viva marks in JNU entrance exam. The high weightage in the viva voce has remained a major structural obstacle for several decades now, and for the first time in JNU's history, we are seeing attempts to remove this obstacle. .
.
Let us see some facts: .
It is AISA which initiated and has consistently been raising the issue of reduction in weightage of viva marks for a long time. This issue came to the fore during the long struggle against the faulty cut-off criteria for OBC students, and was added in the petition filed in the Delhi High Court in 2010. Immediately after the Supreme Court judgement of 18 August 2011 and historic victory of the student community on the cut-off issue, AISA (in its pamphlet dated 19 August 2011) told the student community: .
''While we celebrate the SC verdict, it is important to remember that several struggles lie ahead of us. The weightage for viva marks : The weightage for viva marks in JNUs entrance exam is as high as 30%. This practice (which incidentally is against Supreme Court directives, as well as against norms followed by other universitiesand the UPSC for instance), has consistently been used to discriminate against students from deprived backgrounds.There have been several instances where students have been shockingly under-marked in the viva, despite having scoredhigh marks in the written exam. ... However, the JNU administration has taken no steps in this direction.'' So, it was AISA which highlighted this burning for the first time in decades, in JNU, while SFI had never before raised it. .
On 27 August 2011, immediately after the viva marks were made public, AISA released a pamphlet analysing the data and showing the blatant discrimination in the viva voce (the only organisation to do so). Wasn't the SFI sleeping then? Subsequently, AISA kept raising this issue. .
.
.
.
Date: 9.8.08 .
ANOIVIALIES IN JNU ADMISSIONS IMMEDIATELY! .
UNITE lN MASSIVE NUMBERS TO PRESSURIZE THE .JNU ADMlNISTRATION TO CORRECT ALL.
Friends, .
The second informal council meeting of the .JNUSU was held yesterday night over the entire set of.
problems confronting the student community regarding admissions-2008. However, we are once again constrained to inform the student community that in spite of hours of discussion, the JNUSU OfficeBearers are refusing lo accept that there is any seat cut in JNU. Far from agreeing to build pressure upon the JNU Administration in o united manner to urgently toke corrective steps, the JNUSU Office Bearersare satisfied with the odrninistrotion's logic that ther~ has been no seal cut in JNU this year. It is indeed.
disappointing that the Office Bearers do no! hove any concrete facts and figures to substantiate their.
point, but ore choosing to repose their faith entirely in the JNU Administration, contrary to what is .
evident to the student community at large!.
Yesterday. during the informal council meeiing. the Olfice Bearers of the Jf'lUSU offered to lead a joint .
agitation provided we first concede that "intake" should be the basis for all calculations related to .
reservations a'ld seat increase. However, accepting this would mean that we agree to a basis that not .
' only restricts the total number of admissions to JNU to the least possible, bu1 also amounts to a net seat-cut compared to last year, as is already evident in M.Phii/Ph.D admissions. Accepting this would also.
mean that lhe number of students admitted to JNU under the SC/ST, OBC and PH quota would also be.
calculated or the basis of the mrnir.luP1 f1oure: c.f intake and therefore restricted to the lowest possible..
-'.
We corn'-/ agree with the Office Bearers· posilion that fhe 12% OBC quota for this year {which in itself is.
deep11 P ct,en ot1-: since JNU hoo ?4% OBC students in last year's odmissiol'ls) and 3% PH quota should be fulftlr-3 J ·:) 1 n e besis :::>t 'intakE · R)tile·, t! c:: Lcsts r::·f all calculations should be 'offer', which has been1he case i'l Jt JU ;cr se\·erol da.::ades. so rnor 'hs· moximum numbers of students are able to join JNUunder oil ca:egonr:;s Accusing us of ~aki,1r::i on illegal position is not only a completely fabricated and .
hJllo"'-crorqe, bJT is also based on absolute ignorance about how admissrons have been held in JNU for several decac..es. Hod aomiss1ons based ')'I thf' 'offer' system been illegal, then all admissions in JNU till last year 11'"\Ciuding !hose under SC/ST and PY quota (which were all calculated on the basis of 'offer') .
would have been rendered illegal!.
We are also surprised by the Office BParer's accusation yesterday that we were silent for a long time .
and chose to de!iberately delay bringing all matters concerned with admissions to light. On the contrary ' .
it is the Office Bearers who agreed to all sorts of anti-student logic peddled by t11e JNU Administration in .
the Academic Council and in subsequent mee1ings of the Standing Committee on Admissions {where .
only Office Bearer's are allowed to attend on behalf of the JNUSU} and failed to inform the student community about major anti-stddent changes brought about in the basis and process of admissions.Thanks to !heir abject surrender, admissions to JNU have been held under a shroud of unprecedentedmystery and lack of transparency. Arbitrary procedures have resulted in multiple standards in the admission process -intake-offer for BA, waiting lists for other programmes, no waiting list for MA Urdu.
etc. As soon as v.te received feedback from the students from the various Schools and Centres aboutseat cuts, we informed the student community and simul1aneously requisitioned an immediate Council Meeting of t·he JNUSU to discuss ond decide upor, this urgent matter. An informal Council meeting wasthe Councillors of the JNUSU be blamed for 1he irresponsibility of the Office Bearers? .
held on 3rd August 2008. But the Office Bearers chose 1o dismiss all our concerns as baseless. How can.
We are also surprised by ·the labored a11emp1s by i·he JNUSU Office Bearers to confuse the students.
regarding our position on seai cuts. We are not changing our position between 'offer' and joined. Our .
position is very clear-that the JNU Adminis1ration and the JNUSU Office Bearers have already decided.
to implemenl only 12% OBC reservation and 18% sea1 increase this year, inslead of 27% OBC reservation.
in one go and 54% seat increase which had been agreed between the JNU Administration and lastyear's JNUSU. While maintaining cur opposition to the compromised formula of 12% OBC reservation .
p. To() .
.
.
,.. .
.
' Red Salute to the Grit ofall the Indefinite Hunger Strikers Who Fasted for than 12 .
.
days and Displayed Unfailing Determination in Spite of Their Failing HealthI .
12.7.07 Congratulations to the Student-Teacher-Karamchari Unity on Campus thanks to which Several Issues on Charter of Demands Stand Clinched, .
~ . .
,And a Significant Step Ahead Towards Revocation of Students' Punishments .
The Relay Hunger Strike since June 23, and the Indefinite Hunger Strike that was on its 12th Day fmally achieved success, with the JNUSU and the Administration signing a written agreement today. .
' On Revocation of Punishments: The fLrst item ofthe agreement is a significant step towards revocation ofthe punishments of 11 students: according to this item, the VC, on receiving individual letters of regret with an appeal from the concerned students, will reconsider the punishments so as to enable them to take registration by 14 August .
While the determination ofthe student community and the support from the teaching community and democratic sections ofsociety must be congratulated for this development, the fact remains that the student movement must continue to be. vigilant. While the indefinite hunger strike has been lifted following this agreement, the students and the JNUSU must continue their campaigti and movement in other fom1S until each and every punitive measure against these students is actually revoked. .
It is the hope ofthe JNU community that the JNU Vice Chancellor wiU respond to the democratic appeals issued by students and teachers and wiJJ revoke the punishments at the earliest .
On the issue of minimum wages for workers and other legal entitlements ofworkers: To ensure the rights ofworkers, the Universityhasagteed to constitute a permanentcommittee with the representation ofall sections ofthe University community within one month. Students, teachers and karamcharis must participate inthe setting up ofthis committee and act speedily to ensure that this committee can correct the widespread violations ofminimum wage laws at the earliest. .
Advances on OtherIssues of Charter ofDemands .
The other important issues on the Charter ofDemands' that have been clinched are as follows: .
.
.
On UGC Scholarships for Research scholars: The University has agreed to pursue the matter with the UGC with regard to advancing the date ofthe Rs. 3000-Rs. 6000 fellowship for research scholars to July 2005 .
.
.
On enhancement ofMCM and raising of income cap for MCM: MCM scholarship amount for BA!MAIMSc'MCA students has been raised toRs. 1500 per month from April 1 2007, and the annual income cap for MCM eligibility has been raised to Rs. 1 lakh, following approval fromACIEC meetings .
.
.
On Inclusion of Gender Violence in GSCASH: The proposal to include gender violence in the purview ofGSCASH will be referred to all Schools/Centres/Unions/ Associations within 3 months .
.
.
On Democratisation ofEOO: The Committee that had been setup to look into further democratisation ofEqual Opportunity Office will be asked to expedite its decision .
.
.
On Recognition ofMadarsa Certificates for BA 1-r YearAdmissions in JNU: JNUSU had been persistently struggling to clinch this issue and had conducted a massive signature campaign and public meetings to sensitise JNU on the need to democratise the admissions process. Following this campaign, the matter had been taken up by the Equivatence Committee of JNU which had sought inputs from other Universitjes which recognise madarsa degrees. Responses from these universities have arrived and in today's agreement, the Administration has agreed to vigorously pursue the matter towards recognition ofthe madarsa degrees. .
.
.
While these are significant gains, JNUSU and the JNU student movement must pursue each ofthese issues to its logical conclusion. This long and continuing struggle is a remarkable chapter in the history ofthe JNU student movement. Itwas marked by the democratic spirit asserted .
-by the students of JNU in their deteunination to set a new agenda for the student movement by taking up the struggleS of workers and preventing the victimisation oftheir comrades in this struggle; .
-by the teachers ofJNU in their support to the minimum wage struggle and their resistance to the punitive actions on activists of that struggle .
by a range ofdemocratic personalities, citizens and academics who issued statements in solidarity with the students or who came to meet the hunger strikers: Historians Sumit Sarkar, Uma Cbak.ravarty, Poet Viren Dangwal (who met hunger strikers yesterday), legal experts like Prashant Bhushan and Colin Gonsalves, writer Arundhati Roy, filmmakers likeAnand Patwardhan and Sanjay Kak, social activists like Medha Patkar, and ex-VC ofNEHU B D Sharma, human rights groups likePUDR and EPW consultant editor Gautam Navlakha, Sumit Chakravarty, editorofMainstream,joumalists likeAmit Sengupta, former JNUSU office bearers, various central Trade Union bodies and academics ofvarious campuses in the capjtallike Delhi University and Jamia Millia Islamia, and various JNU alunmi, to name just a few. The JNU student movement will continue this democratic .
bond in the days to come. .
We hope that today's agreement is a sign that the JNU Administration will in future view students' struggles on issues like minimum wages and workers' rights in a positive rather than a punitive light. We believe that the JNUAdministration will carry forward the spirit oftoday's agreement and will work along with the entire JNU community to build a more humane, egalitarian and democratic JNU. .
sdi-Awadhesh, President, AISA. JNU sd/-Mobeen Alam, vice-President. AISA, JNU .
I .
.
I.
. .
r .
1 .
r .
j .
r .
::l .
..... .
s .
y .
m .
.
311 .
.
), .
' .
.
... .
.
-' ,..I .
~ .
... .
.
.
.
0 II --.:::~".
........_~.
.
,~~~ ....... .
.
such a proposal is an empty tokenism for It amounted to 100°/o subsidy for 0°/o applicants, when it is well known.
that availing a BPL certificate is a process fraught with many problems, and there is no adequate data on the extent to.
which such families are able to avail education, let alone enter the the realm of higher education and apply for a JNU.
prospectus. The BPL waiver simply cannot compensate or counterbalance the damage that the increased pros~ec~us.
fees have inflicted. Firstly, the fees hike has damaged the basic ethical premise that universities or admiSSIOn.
processes cannot be run like commercial and profiteering ventures. Secondly, through higher prices, it h~s.
discouraged and actually squeezed out those in the social ladder who are struggling against odds to begin to eqUip.
themseJves with an education, and aspire to come for higher education. Administration.
substantial arguments led a complete breakdown of all meaningful dialogue on 20 Feb. After this, in spite of .
's refusal to engage with theserepeated attempts, no dialogue could be resumed and all our genuine efforts in this regard came to a naught..
After five days of failed efforts to resume discussion, on Wednesday, 25 February, the JNUSU held a protest.
demonstration, where it closed the counter for the sale of forms. This step was meant to indicate the closing down.
of dialogue on the part of the administration, and the fact that decisions taken by the administration were.
serving to 'close down access' to JNU for a large number ofstudents across the country. There was absolutely.
no violence involved in this protest, none of the officials on duty were physically or even verbally assaulted in any way,.
nor was any harm done to official property. Further, the incontrovertible logic is that this step could in no way prevent.
the sale of forms in outlets across the city and this country; rather, it was meant to bring student dissatisfaction on theissue once again to the notice of the administration.But the administration responded immediately, not with dialogue but with an automatic crackdown. TheAdministration handed show-cause notice to these five activists ---and then declared them rusticated within.
two hours, much before they got any time to respond..
Why was the JNU Administration in such haste to rusticate these students and declare them out-of-bounds? Wecannot help contrasting this response with the selfsame Administration's indulgent attitude when communallumpens engaged in open violence and vandalism on the night of the JNUSU Presidential Debate in the 2007.
elections. Despite the fact that this violence took place in full view of JNU's security staff [some of whom were.
themselves injured], the Administration mysteriously turned a blind eye. It was only after sustained student proteststhat the Administration eventually set up an Enquiry Committee to look into the incident. This Committee was meant to.
complete its task in 6 weeks, but took 6 months to come up with a report. Yet, the JNU Administration took no punitive.
action against those named as guilty in the report! The guilty were let off with a mere 'warning'!.
In the present situation, it is obvious that the Administration was determined to crack down on the democraticprotest of students, at the slightest pretext; they did away with the pretence of dialogue and took to wieldingthe stick. .
Against Administrative Waste, Damage and CommercializationThe JNU administration is trying to peddle the misinformation that JNU students who are 'rich', are basically struggling.
only to save themselves a cost of a mere 80 rupees in buying a new prospectus when applying for further courses..
Nothing could be further from the truth. Such administrative propaganda is a mere smokescreen to hide the practisesof wanton waste, damage and commercialisation that the JNU Administration has been indulging in for the past few.
months. The student protest against the continued sale of the prospectus at increased rates, must be seen as a.
continuation of the entire phase of struggle which has lasted over a month and which has been conducted by the.
JNUSU leadership in a reasoned and responsible manner..
All the above concerns are in a sense part of a vision that all of us in the JNU community dream and stand for. What, we are struggling to retain is the basic ethics on which a higher education institution like JNU will function: will JNUcontinue to be socially-inclusive and accessible, or will JNU be run like a commercial enterprise based on crude.
considerations ofamassing profit? .
an 'elite' institution by closing down access to students of deprive groups; the logic of running a university.
not as an institute of higher learning but on a 'profit'.
signboards and mindless 'beautificationbasis; the wanton wastage of resources on plasma TVs, .
.
The issues at stake affect all of us ---the loss of green spaces in the campus; insidious attempts to make JNU .
.
' drives, alongside an insistence that students be made to pay forbasic services. The manner in which this administration is proceeding unilaterally in its course of action.
leads to grave concerns that the very character of JNU as an institution of repute and critical thinking, built up.
by so many generations over the years is at stake..
. :' :. :· . t~:·· .
JNUSU had earlier also issued an appeal to the teaching community for solidarity on the entire range of these matterswhich affect all of us, each and every member of the university community. We urge you to intervene to ensure thatthe rustications on student activists are removed, that the administration addresses the legitimate concernsof the student community and initiate a productive dialogue with the JNUSU so that a democratic consensusmay be evolved on these issues of pressing concern for the university community as a whole..
Sandeep Shcphalika Pallavi Deka.
.. President, JNUSV Md. Mobeen Alam.
Vice-President, JNUSU Gen. Secy., JNVSU Jt. Secy., JNUSU .
'· \, .
2 .
·~·. ' .. ···~· !li r,, .,1· ;+ ·:·.
, ;'; ;:! I:, 11. .v, ,, .. -· j: .
"!. .
... ~-.
.
.
, .
.
.
.
~ .
.
.
In particular, in 2006 and 2007, the intake/offer/joined for CESP (MA) had been: .
Intakc Offered .Joined .
2006 ~ 50 107 42 .
.
:2007 -~ 50 I I 8 41 .
.. .
.
-.
In particular. for example, the intake/offer/joined for CESP (MA) 111 2006 and 2007, had been: .
.
"Seats Offer" does NOT ind1cate and is NOT equivalent to the actual number of seats and the actual number of students in the University. .
.
.
The ·'offer" method so far adopted is merely a one-shot measure to fill the intake. .
.
.
So, the SFI's devious method of only projecting " seats offered" as the actual number of seats, and thereby spreading that there is a massive seat-cut is a complete travesty of facts and truth. .
.
.
Will SFI .
clarify: Can "seats offered" which they are peddling, be the basis of implementation of reservation and seat increase that is being initiated this year? .
Let us note that there are two possible methods of fulfilling the "intake". One method practiced so far is the ''seats offered" method, whereby some extra seats over and above the "intakenare announced, once and for all, to fulfil the"intake". The other method is to have a waiting list and announce a series of time-bound 2nd/3rd lists from amongst the wa1tlisted candidates, as is being practiced this year (2008). It is to be noted that JNUSU strongly stood for the .
continuation of the "offer system" in the Academic Council meeting for fulfilling "intake" compared to the wait list .
system. However majority of the faculty and centres argued in favour of waitlist and subsequent 2°d/3rd list systems for .
fulfilling the intake in course of the new adm1ssion system for this year when OBC reservation and seat increase was .
to be implemented. But whatever be the debate regarding the method of fulfilling the uintake", the crucial .
issue was the correct implementation of OBC reservations and seat increase in the new admission policy, for .
which "intake" of 2006 forms the legal basis for all calculations and NOT "seats offered". ' .
Another big confusion that SFI is indulging in is to equate incomparables : compare .
the " offer" list of last year (2007) with the very first ''intake# list of this year (2008). .
S111ce the earlier method of one-shot "seat offer" method has not been adopted this year. any data on "seats offered" in 2008 will have to include the seats in first list along with all the subsequent (2°d/ 3rd etc) lists announced. For example, in CESP (MA}. so far in 2008, 97 students have been offered seats (62 in the 1st list and 35 in the 2"d list)towards fulfilling the mandated "intake". Overall in JNU so far, 2102 students have already been offered seats till Saturday afternoon (Aug 2, 2008), and not 1836 which SFI has quoted in its malicious poster campaign. Clearly, even if we talk in terms of (/seats offered", correct calculation shows that the "seats offered" in 2008 till now is 2102 which 1s 90 more than the 2007 (/seat offer" figure of 2012. More lists are awaited as the admission process is .
still in progress. Such motivated spread o'f confusion with numbers must be condemned. .
The Real Dan gers Of Such Motivated Mischief .
While politicking might have inspired SFI to indulge in such games, it has real dangers. .
Firstly, implementation of .
legally mandated reservation and concomitant seat increase demands that all calculations must be done on the basis of intake (base year 2006) and not on the ever fluctuating numbers of seats offered. So, to interpret this year's admission process which has undertaken OBC reservation on the basis of "seats offered", as SFI is .
mischievously doing, is legally untenable and has real danger of inviting legal impediments from the anti-reservation forces. .
Secondly, to wrongly proJect some bloated f1gures as the actual seats in JNU is to fuel those anti-reservation forces in the campus who from the very beginning wanted to block and delay the implementation of the OBC reservation and the seat increase on the spurious plea that it will make the system "too big and thus unmanageable". .
SFI by undertaking these unethical moves, by quot1ng untenable figures is trying to fan a frenzy that can actually act against.
the proper and speedy implementation of the reservation in JNU .
They are also helping to deflect attention from the real problems at hand that administration is putting time and again to scuttle the actual implementation of OBC reservation pertaining to correct application of relaxed eligibility criterion for OBC students. Interestingly, SFI is conspicuous by its total and calculated silence on .
this casteist elitist ploy of the administrations. This calculated silence, however, speaks volumes of their real motives. .
We would also like to inform the student community that the ploy of the JNU administration to scuttle PH reservations has been successfully rebuffed. An additional list of 31 PH students has been released .
on August 2, 2008. However. the discrepancy on OBC reservations regarding the relaxation in the eligibility criterion is yet to be resolved. .
We call upon the JNU student community to rally behind JNUSU in ensuring proper implementation of OBC reservations, and stand up against JNU administration 's casteist attempts to dilute the potential of OBC reservations and at the sam e time to foil all other devious methods to deflect attention from the real challenges at hand. .
Sandeep P<lllavi Dcka Md. Mobccn Al:-1m .
President. JNUSU Gen Secv. JNUSU.
Jr Secv.. JNUSU .
.-.
o; o, j( O .
,. ~:..:;..'·;;:.: .
' .
' .
'.
~;.~~~J.~: . .
.... .
.
..W...,t...O .
.
.
.
·.2o \to LlJ:(.r .
20.10.11.
21 Nov Democratise JNU'5 rJ.d.r~~..i55iOTl 'PoRi~ AC tJ. 1td FtJ.c..URf-tt-?4 PP.o i~t.i-m.e,fli-5! .
Ensure Social JliSUce and Inclusion in JNU's .
.
Meeting .
Student Admission and Faculty Appointments! Jolfl united .
Reduce Weightage for V iva-Voce in JNU Admissions as per the Protest Demo .
' Supreme Court Guidelines! End Discrimination through Viva Marks! in front of the AC Meeting .
Extend Recognition To More Madarsa Certificates .
Recommended By the Expert Body of the Equivalence Committee! .
Concretise the Mandates of Earlier AC Meetings Without Any Delay!! 21 Nov SSS-1 .
Ensure Proper Reservations in All Faculty Positions! Start 2.00pm.
Appointments Without Any Further Delay!!----------------------+ .
The meeting ofthe academic council (AC) ofJNU is scheduled for the 21st of October 2011, tomorrow.1t is important for the democratic and .
progressive sections of this campus to ensure that anumber of issues, pertaining to JNU's admission policy and social inclusion are tabled and .
deliberated upon. To ensure social justice and inclusion in JNU's admission and appointmentpolicy, we urge upon the ACto consider and approve: .
.
Reduction in the weightage for Viva~Voce in JNU Admissions as per the Supreme Court Guidelines' .
.
.
Extending recognition to MORE Madarsa Certificates as recommended by the expert body of the Equivalence Committee! .
.
.
Ensure Proper SC/ST and OBC Reservations in all Faculty Positions! .
.
.
Weightage for Viva-Voce: .
For several years, the JNU administration has been allocating aweightage of 30% for interviews in the admission process.Notonly is this iJiegaJ, it also leaves ample scope fordiscrimination.ln the past, students have indicated several instances where candidates from deprived backgrounds were being given abysmally low marks in the viva, desprte the fact that they had scored high marks in the written examination.The high weightage for viva marks leaves the door open for subjective biases (ofvarious kinds) of the evaluators to unduly influence the final results. Therefore. it is urgent that in the interests of ensuring objectivity and impartiality, and reducing the evident subjective and ideological biases of the evaluators, the weightage ofviva marks be reduced from next year.AISAhas been repeatedly raising the issue and submitted adetailed factual note to the Standing Committee on Admissions during its Meeting of28 Sep 2010. .
In Violation of the 5-Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court .
Indeed,it must also be noted that the JNU's admission policy on viva-voce is in violation ofthe verclict of a 5-Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court given in 13 Nov. 1980 (Ajay Hasia Etc. vs. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & Ors). This 5-Judge bench comprising (comprising P.N. Bhagwati. YV. Chandracbud (CJI). V.R. Kdshnajyer. Syed Murtaza Eazal Ali. A.D.Koshal) said, "We are ofthe view that. under the existing circumstances. allocation of more than 15% ofthe total marks for the oral interview would be arbitrary and unreasonable and would be Hable to be struck down as constitutionally invalid." .
Itmustbe noted thatthe in the Delhi High Courtduring the OBC ucut-Off' Definition case ofSap. 2010, (which was finaDy ratified in the Supreme Court in Aug 2011 ), students' petition also included the demand for "reducing the weightage in viva markshand bringing it in line with the earl1er court judgements ofkeeping viva-marks atNOT morethan 10%-15% ofthe total evaluation. Given the enormity ofthe bcut~ff'controversy, the High Court atthatjuncture did notconcentrate on the second part ofthe petition. .
We believe that "wecightage in viva"is an issue that can be resolved within the decision-making bodies like Standing Committee on Admissions, Academic Council etc. ofthe universrty and hence must be resolved without any delay before the admtssions for the coming academic year. .
Expanding the Scope of Recognition of ~adarsa certificates: .
When Madarsa certfficates were first recognized in the 30April2008 AC meeting, as aresult of aprotracted struggle by theAISA~Ied JNUSU, itwas also resolved that recognition would gradually be expanded to include more madarsas in subsequent years. .
After our new VC assumed office, the expansion of recognition of madarsas was raised in the students' charter ofdemand, which was submitted to him and also during theAC meeting of18 March 2011.1n a welcome development, the AC, in its meeting of18 March 2011, constituted an expert sub-commrttee to pursue the process of granting recognition to more madarsas. The sub--committee took up the task in right earnest and by May 2011, forwarded its report which recommended recognition be granted to around 10 more madarsas. However, despite being pursued, the meeting of the Equivalence Committee; to approve this report,was not convened till as late as 17 October! Whythis delay? Despite the hard work ofthe sub-committee,the report is not being tabled in the AC on the pretext that the minutes of the Equivalence committee are not re.ady! This is an absolutely unacceptable bureaucratic delay, which, if not immediately addressed, will lead to ablatant denial ofthe rights ofdeserving students from Madarsa background to study in JNU in the coming year. .
Implementing Reservations in ALL Faculty Positions: .
The long-pending issue ofimplementing 22% SCI STand also OBC reservations in ALL faculty posrtions must be resolved without any furtherdelay and the process of making new appointments must begin. ldeological biases within the JNU establishment cannot be allowed to stall or scutt.le the implementation of constitutionally mandated provisions any longer. It is a matter of grave concern that reservation at all revels of faculty has not taken place, in spite of this being agross disregard of social justice and the constitution. .
At the upcomingAC meeting oftomorrow, it is important that these issues are tabled and resolved. AISA calls upon the student community to ensHre that these demands are fulfilled by the AC by participating in large numbers at a United Protest Demonstration tomorrow, 21 October 2011at 2.30 pm in front of SSS I. .
Shephalika, President, AISA. JNU Sucheta. Gen.Secy., AISAJNU .
.
.
.
.
Indefinite Hunger Strike Day 3.
Intensify the Ongoing Struggle Against Administration's Ploy .
Sandeep, President, JNUSU .
To Scuttle Reservation And Seat lncreaseln JNU's Admissions. .
Mobeen, Jt. Secy., JNUSU .
Correct All The Persisting Anomalies In 2008 Admissions .
Anandi VismayDemo at UGC Relay Hunger Strike 13 Aug . 2.30pm Sharda, GSCASH .
Bus to Leave Ad Block At 1.30pm Digvijay, Piyush, Rajan, Sandeep .
12.8.08 .
Today is the 3rd day of the indefinite hunger strike which JNUSU has launched since Saturday night against several anomalies in JNU's admission process, particularly ilon-fulfilment of OBC, PH, SC/ST quota and the increased seat intake. From the very beginning of the admission process, JNUSU and the student community have engaged in a prolonged battle with the JNU administration to ensure that correct norms are observed and OBC reservation and seat increase is duly done. J NUSU congratulates the student community for their spirited participation in yesterday's protest demonstration during the meeting of the Standing committee on admissions and for ensuring a successful flash strike today against continuing administrative anomalies. .
During the meeting, JNUSU strongly demanded that the mandated increased seat intake at the various centres be fully filled. The administration was forced to agree to JNUSU's demands that the 19 vacant seats in the BA programme be filled. Subsequently, a list of 29 students has been brought out. The administration also agreed to fill the intake in the MPhii/Phd programme, and an additional list will be brought out today. .
However, the administration remained adamant in not fulfilling JNUSU's other demands. They refused to bring out a· waiting list for the MA Urdu programme where the intake has not been filled , even though the SFC (Student Faculty Committee) has written to the administration demanding that the eligibility criteria be changed in order to accommodate more students Regarding fulfilment of the PH quota, the administration claimed that wherever there were PH seats, all eligible PH students have been admitted. JNUSU however strongly argued that the PH quota has to be fulfilled at any cost, and extra PH seats should be created if necessary. JNUSU demanded that the last date of admissions be extended keeping in view all these anomalies. .
But on the critical issue of filling the OBC quota. the administration showed its casteist colour once again in spite of being completely exposed both in terms of law and logic by JNUSU. JNUSU argued that the significant shortfall in the OBC intake this year is because of the completely erroneous and legally untenable methodology that the JNU administration has adopted in fixing the stipulated relaxation in cut-off for the OBC students. JNUSU maintains that the central question today in resolving the non-fulfilment of the OBC quota lies in correcting the dubious and casteist yardstick of the administration, which if unaddressed, will never let the OBC quota be filled in this campus. It is urgent for the students and teachers on this campus to speak up w1th f1rm clarity on this, and not let the administration have its casteist ways. JNUSU has already submitted a detailed note both to the administration as well as the UGC for immediate course correction. .
Let us summarise the basic points below: .
The Office Memorandum of MHRD dated 20 April, 2008 on the modalities of Implementation of the OBC Reservation Act offers the following guidelines ( para (X) and (XI) with respect to the relaxation and application of Cut-off Rules for OBC reservation: .
"Each CEI is also authorized to fix cut off marks for admission/selection through admission test. etc. for the OBC candidates with such differential from the cut off marks for the unreserved category as each institution may deem appropriate for maintaining the standards of education and at the same time ensuring that sufficient number of OBC candidates are available in keeping with the directions/observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in this regard. This authorization by the central Government to the CEis to fix the cut off marks in the compliance with the Apex Courts direction asking The Central Government to examinethe feasibility of determining such cut-off marks. TheCentral Government believes that each CEI would ensure that the directions/ observatioAs of the Honble Court are followed " .
"CEis which are in process of conductmg admiss1on tests may decide on the cut-off marks for the OBC category well in time, so .
that consistent with the standards of the education of the CEis, sufficient number of eligible OBC candidates are .
available for selection on the basis of lnter-se merit against the reserve seats. Such institutions may also obtain information .
pertaining to the background of students who may have indicated as belonging to the OBC category in the application form,so as to identify .
those belonging to the 'creamy layer' from among them for exclusion from the counseling/ interview/ group discussions/ offer of admis-.
sions." .
In light of this, a correct admission and reservation process in JNU should be along the following line: .
According to the Act and the Directive, the university must fix "cut-off marks" for both unreserved and OBC candidates well in time. The stated cut-off marks is supposed to "maintain the standards of education" in a particular institution and is a pre-de~ided policy parameter on which it evaluates whether students fit the standards of the Institute or not. The cut-off is not based on the performance of a particular batch of entrance-seekers. In JNU, for the unreserved candidates the existing bench-mark, the cut off is 40. .
Secondly, as per the directions of Honourable Supreme Court-a maximum relaxation of 10 points can be given to an OBC candidate with regard to the un-reserved candidates as a differential. This means that the OBC candidate can get at the most 10 marks less than an unreserved candidate. Accordingly, in JNU, the "cut-off mark" for OBC candidates .
P.T.O. .
.
.
Indefinite Hunger Strike Day 3 .
Intensify the Ongoing Struggle Against Administration's Ploy .
Sandeep, President, JNUSU .
To Scuttle Reservation And Seat lncreaseln JNU's Admissions. Mobeen, Jt. Secy., JNUSU .
Correct All The Persisting Anomalies In 2008 Admissions .
Anandi Vismay.
Demo at UGC Relay Hunger Strike .
.
13 Aug 2.30pm Sharda, GSCASH .
Digvijay, Piyush, Rajan, Sandeep.
I 8us to Leave Ad 81 ock_~t 1 . ~Q_pm .
12.8.08 .
I .
Today is the 3ro day of the Indefinite hunger strike which JNUSU has launched since Saturday night against several anomalies in JNU's admission process, particularly ,1on-fulfilment of OBC, PH, SC/ST quota and the increased seat intake. From the very beginning of the admission process, JNUSU and the student community have engaged in a prolonged battle with the JNU administration to ensure that correct norms are observed and OBC reservation and seat increase is duly done. JNUSU congratulates the student community for their sp1rited participation in yesterday's protest demonstration during the meeting of the Standing committee on admissions and for ensuring a successful flash strike today against continuing .
administrative anomalies. During the meeting, JNUSU strongly demanded that the mandated increased seat intake at the various centres be fully filled. The administration was forced to agree to JNUSU's demands that the 19 vacant seats in the BA programme be filled. Subsequently, a list of 29 students has been brought out. The administration also agreed to fill the intake in the MPhii/Phd programme, and an additional list will be brought out today. .
However, the administration remained adamant in not fulfilling JNUSU's other demands. They refused to bring out a· wait1ng list for tl1e MA Urdu programme where the intake has not been filled, even though the SFC (Student Faculty Committee) has written to the administration demanding that the eligibility criteria be changed in order to accommodate more students Regarding fulfilment of the PH quota, the administration claimed that wherever there were PH seats, all .
el1gible PH students have been admitted JNUSU however strongly argued that the PH quota has to be fulfilled at any cost, and extra PH seats should be created if necessary. JNUSU demanded that the last date of admissions be extended keeping in view all these anomalies. .
But on the critical issue of filling the OBC quota, the administration showed its casteist colour once again in spite of being completely exposed both in terms of law and logic by JNUSU. JNUSU argued that the significant shortfall in the OBC intake this year is because of the completely erroneous and legally untenable methodology that the JNU .
administration has adopted in fixing the stipulated relaxation in cut-off for the OBC students. JNUSU maintains that the central question today in resolving the non-fulfilment of the OBC quota lies in correcting the dubious and casteist yardstick of the administration, w hich if unaddressed, will never let the OBC quota be filled in this campus. It is urgent for the students and teachers on this campus to ·speak up with f1rm clarity on this, and not let the administration have its casteist ways. JNUSU has already submitted a detailed note both to the administration as well as the UGC for · .
immediate course correction. .
Let us summarise the basic points below: .
The Office Memorandum of MHRD dated 20 April, 2008 on the modalities of Implementation of the OBC Reservation Act offers the following guidelines ( para (X) and (XI) with respect to the relaxation and application of Cut-off Rules for OBC reservation .
Each CEI is also authorized to fix cut off marks for admission/selection through admission test, etc. for the OBC candidates with .
such differential from the cut off marks for the unreserved category as each institution may deem appropriate for maintaining the .
standards of education and at the same time ensuring that sufficient number of OBC candidates are available in keeping .
with the directions/observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in this regard. This authorization by the central .
Government to the CEis to fix the ctJt off marks in the compliance with the Apex Courts direction asking The Central Government to .
exam1ne the feasibility of determining such cut-off marks. The Central Government believes that each CEI would ensure that the directions/ .
observations of the Hon'ble Court are followed." .
~eEls which are in process of conducting admiss1on tests may decide on the cut-off marks for the OBC category well in time, so tha~ consistent with the standards of the education of the CEJs, sufficient number of eligible OBC candidates are available for selection on the basis of inter-se merrt against the reserve seats. Such institutions may also obtain information pertaining to the background of students who may have indicated as belonging to the OBC category in the application form, so as to identify t~ose belonging to the 'creamy layer' from among them for exclusion from the counseling/ interview/ group discussions/ offer of admis-Sions." .
In light of this, a correct admission and reservation process in JNU should be along the following line: .
~cc~rding to the Act and the Directive, the university must fix "cut-off marks" for both unreserved and OBC candidat~s well m time. The stated cut-off marks is supposed to "maintain the standards of education" in a particular institution and IS .
a pre-de~ided policy parameter on which it evaluates whether students fit the standards of the Institute or not. The cut-.
off is not based on the performance of a particular batch of entrance-seekers. In JNU, for the unreserved candidates the .
existing bench-mark, the cut off is 40. .
Secondly, as per the directions of Honourable Supreme Court -a maximum relaxation of 10 points can be given to an OBC candidate with regard to the un-reserved candidates as a differential. This means that the OBC candidate can get at the most 10 marks less than an unreserved candidate. Accordingly, in JNU, the "cut-off mark" for OBC candidates .
P.T.O. .
.
.
.
STUDENTS' FEDERATION OF INDIA .
It is highly unfortunate that the JNU Administration did not give any commitment on any of the Issues.raised in .
today's demonstration, particularly, pertaining to the demand for recognition of Alimiyat/Fazeelat certificates for .
admission to BA first year. The Administration did not even agree to include this as an agenda for the emergency.
council meeting. While the JNUSU will tomorrow sit In the committee meetl':'g for OBC r~servatlon, we appeal to .
JNUSU to pressurize the Administration to recognize Alimiyat/Fazeelat certificates In BA f1rst year. .
UPHOLD 27% OBC RESERVATION & 54% SEAT INCREASE!! .
DOWN WITH SECTARIAN POLITICS OF AISA!! .
.
Friends, , .
Date: 18-01-07 .
we congratulate the student community for participating in yesterday's prot~st demonstration. against the castelst derogatory campaign of the Youth For (In) Equality and in today's protest demonstration at ~dmm1s~rat1ve bi~C:k demandmg27o/o OBC Reservation and 54°/o seat increase. Our campus, which is known for its progressive soc1ally sens1t1ve character,.
has always been at the forefront of struggles for social justice under the leadership of JNUSU. It Is only as a result of the consistent pressure of the JNUSU on the Administration, that a committee has been formed to suggest modal1t1es ofimplementing 27°/o OBC reservation and 54°/o seat increase. The first meeting of the committee .
IS scheduled for tomorrow at 11 :OOam. We appeal to JNUSU to immediately start a process of discussion within the student community regarding the proposals that will be forwarded before this committee. .
At a time when our university Is on the verge of implementing a new policy with massive scope of expansion of the seats and infrastructure in JNU, there is a need of unity w ithin the student community to isolate the YFE on the one hand and pressurize the Administration not to dilly-dally on this issue. It Is extremely un1'ortunate and shame1'ul that the .JNUSU General Secretary Instead of ensuring the .
unity o1' the .JNUSU as well as the student .
community, yesterday refused to sign on a pamphlet with the .JNUSU President and .Joint Secretary. He did not even bother to have a .
look at the content of the pamphlet, which called for today's demonstration,choosing to bring out a pamphlet In this .
own name. This is nothing but utter sectarianism and we strongly condemn theJNUSU General Secretary for breaking the unity of the JNUSU and pursuing h is own agenda of one-upmanship disrupting.
the unity of the students. .
The duplicity o1' AISA Is 1'urther exposed from the 1'act that their Councillor in SLL&CS has no qualms in bringing out joint notices with ABVP and NSUI Councillors. The AISA have found new bedfellows in ABVP and NSUI, who according their infantile understanding must be having some 'revolutionary' credentials. Thefact that the AISA has no qualms .
in bringing out joint pamphlets with ABVP and NSUI but not with the .JNUSU President and.Jt. secretary, exposes their complete anti-left, sectarian and opportunist agenda. .
This Is however not the first time that the .JNUSU General Secretary has indulged in such acts of breaking studentunity on matters where there was complete consensus. In the month of Docember, the .JNUSU General Secretary callodfor a hunger atrlke on the laaue of reservation without consulting any other office bearer and without making any.
effort to mobilize tho students. Why? Again, when the .JNUSU President called for a Protest Demonstration at Nltharl .
on sth ..January agalnet the gruesome killing of" children, .
the ..JNUSU General Secretary c alled for a separate Protest.
Demonstration on the aame day at a different time. Why? He and his organization the AISA owe an .
explanation to thestudent community for such sectarian approach on crucial Issues of students' interests. .
In sharp contrast to this sectarian attitude of the JNUSU General Secretary, the JNUS U President has sought toforge the biggest possible unity of the students on the issue of OBC reservation and 54°/o seat increase. The .JNUSUPresident called for an Open M eeting on 141" .January to decide the future course of action and called for a protest.
demonstration today on this issue. However, since the day the .JNUSU President called for the meeting he has been attacked .
In the most abusive language by the Youth For (ln)Equality, targeting him for getting the ball rolling on the issue ofreservation. Instead of standing in solidarity with the JNUSU President and condemning the YFE, the AI SA, has also chosen .
to attack the JNUSU President on most flimsy grounds exposing their complete political bankruptcy. It has been pointed out time and again that the JNUSU President was informed that the Administration had informed the General Secretary too about the meeting with the Administration .
and the JNUTA, held on 10-01 -07. Instead of attacking the Administration for not informing the JNUSU General Secretary, the AISA has unleashed a vicious attack on the JNUSU President which has .
reached newer heights in their yesterday's pamphlet. .
In the all organization .
meeting held on 16-01-07, the JNUSU President informed all the organizations that a committee has been formed to suggest modalities to implement 27% OBC reservation and 54% seat increase whose meeting might be called on Friday itself. In .
this light he only suggested that to concentrate on formulating our blueprint regarding implementation of the policy and organize a protest demonstration OQ the day the committee meets. He also said in .
the meeting that all the other demands, including AlimiyaVFazeelat, transparency in admission process will be taken up with the Administration in the course of these deliberations. .
In order to again consult with the organizations, the meeting was called, where it was decided that it is best if the Protest Demonstration is on. Instead of appreciating the Initiatives taken .
by the JNUSU President to evolve any position on this I$SUe, through wider consultations within the student .
.
.
This article contains the admission process, all the key highlights of BBA distance education which are meant to answer all your queries regarding the course and mode of education. bit.ly/3OgUypv
GIIS Noida, is one of the best international CBSE school in Noida Book a meeting with our academic counsellor or enquire about fees & admissions process of the top CBSE school in Noida. Apply now for admissions into year 2022-23.
Get started with the Online cbse school admission process for 2021-22 at Gems Public School in Patiala. Our admission counselor will help you through the process. gemspublicschoolpatiala.co.in/admissions/
B.Sc in Psychology Course details about, BSc Psychology Admission Process, Eligibility, Course, Fees, Syllabus, Top Psychology Colleges, Salary, Career Scope, and placement.
If you are looking for School Admissions in Noida Extension then you can choose The Shri Ram Universal School which is one of the best CBSE schools in Noida.
#IIFD Offers Undergraduate Degree programs.
Join IIFD Chandigarh & Make a Career in A Creative Field.
For #Admission_Process Call @+919041766699 OR Visit @ iifd.in/
.
Find us on Map-
Chandigarh:- g.page/IIFD-Chandigarh
Mohali:- g.page/IIFDMohaliCampus
#IIFD_CHANDIGARH
Application for admission to schools can be a daunting process for both parents and students. There are a few general tips you can follow to make the best CBSE School in Kolkata admission process easier. Visit our website to learn more.
Get seamless access to CBSE schools admission in Kolkata online. Discover the key aspects of the common admission process. Make sure your child's education is secure.
Click Here: bit.ly/3L2UM3W
Study Canada Consultant in Delhi has years of experience in the education industry. They have in-depth knowledge of the admission process, visa requirements, and scholarship opportunities. They can provide expert advice and guidance to students, making the entire process stress-free.
Embark on a visual journey through the Sainik School Admission Process. Our step-by-step guide illustrates each phase, providing clarity and insight for parents and aspiring cadets alike.
For more information: mathurasainikschool.com
If you want to start with the B.Sc admission process, get in touch with us to know about duration, fee structure, eligibility for B.Sc and related FAQs.
Source: anandcollege.in/admissions/
Explore valuable Army School admission tips to secure a promising future. Gain insights on the admission process, preparation, and strategies for success. Prepare with confidence.
For more information: mathurasainikschool.com/admission.php
BA Visual Arts Course details about, Admission process, Eligibility, Course, Fees, Syllabus, Top BA Visual Arts, College admission, Salary, Career Scope, and placement.
I am a successful FASHION DESIGNER.
Be like Me, Be a Successful #Fashion #Designer.
IIFD will help you to become a Successful Fashion Designer.
Join #IIFD & Make a Career in A Creative Field.
For #Admission_Process Call @+919041766699 OR Visit @ iifd.in/
.
Find us on Map-
Chandigarh:- g.page/IIFD-Chandigarh
Mohali:- g.page/IIFDMohaliCampus
#IIFD_CHANDIGARH
Find the MBA in Entrepreneurship Course details about, Admission process, Eligibility, Course, Fees, Syllabus, Top MBA in Entrepreneurship College admission, Salary, Career Scope, and placement.
If you want to start with the B.Sc admission process, get in touch with us to know about duration, fee structure, eligibility for B.Sc and related FAQs.
Know More: anandcollege.in/admissions/
Considering the significance of fees in the admission process, it is crucial for students to assess whether the fees align with their budget before enrolling in a university. GLA University Online Education Fees understands the importance of accessibility and affordability. By ensuring that the fees are reasonable and competitive, GLA University strives to make quality education accessible to all.
Contact us today
Call us at 9625266808
Email: umeacademyindia@gmail.com
With the compassionate care, support, and guidance from the addiction advisors that work with Fall River Drug Rehab Centers, you will be in the best hands possible. Our main goal as addiction treatment center advocates is to pair you with a drug and alcohol addiction rehab center that will best suit you.
What’s even more lucrative about the services that Fall River Drug Rehab Centers provides is that we handle all of the work for you in regards to the admissions process for addiction treatment. It’s typically a 4-step process that can be time-consuming and tedious, especially if you don’t already have the experience to go through the process.
This image is being stored here for site archiving and future project use. Please do not remove relevant identifiers/meta data. Licensing is provided under a 2016 creative commons-share alike license.
Apply for admission to
CMR University. Check all the details about the CMR University admission process, application form, courses offered, fee structure, ranking, and placements.
Dream Big: Your Roadmap to Army School Admission is your comprehensive guide to navigating the admission process, offering insights and strategies for success in pursuing an education with honor.
.
.
..:. ....... . 't"h&-Oon lh£' roouircrtl~._ ,'lt" II., t:hr .
.
interview is not that stringent, while (ii) says that if a student has done well in the written, then the requirement in the interview is a bit stricter, and (iii) says that if a student has done average in the written, then the requirement in the interview is a stringent. .
For example, for the data above, we could have chosen A = 48, B = 23 and C = 0 and a=O, b=lO, c=27. Thus in effect we have drawn the black line across the marks obtained by the students with any student whose marks falls in the North-East of this line being selected. .
35 .
30 .
·- + .
25 .
.
~.
20 .
I._ -----.
~· .. .
.
15 .
lr------.
..* .
.
10 1-.! ·-~ .
.
.
-o-01.
5 ----.(.> .
.
~ .
"' .
.~ .
..,<r .
(t.
·a ~ ., .
~ .
.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 For example the candidate {117) who got s in the written and 30 in the interview is..chosen· a·nd· · · so is the candidate (1-149) who got 59 in the written and 3 in the interview. .
C. AFORMAL RECOGNITION OF DISABILITY BEYOND RESERVATION AND RAMPS .
5. ·University structures need to be reconfigured to accommodate differcntly-abled students in the admission process. The Equal Opportunities Office must be the body that attends to the needs or such sLUctcnts both dudng admission and afterwards. For deaf candidates, Indian Sign Language i"nterpretation services have to be made available, starting from the entrance examination process itself. Blind candidates must be provided examination papers set in Braille, rather than the practice of allowing for .
.
::-s;:;._·-=:;..__ -.
··~·· .
.
.
Distance Bachelor of Computer Application(BCA) is a Distance Mode of Undergraduate Academic bachelor Degree. See Admission Process, Eligibility, Syllabus, Scope and Placement.
Want to take admission in an accredited nursing school providing certified LPN courses? Enroll in Verve College. Visit vervecollege.edu/admission/ to know about the admission process and earn nursing degrees in Illinois.
Streamline the Sainik School admission process with our hassle-free online registration. Secure your child's future in a few clicks. Enroll now for a brighter tomorrow.
For more information: mathurasainikschool.com/admission.php
Our team excels in guiding applicants make informed choices about global Our team excels in guiding applicants make informed choices about global education opportunities, to navigate complex admissions processes and Visit mba courses abroad
We provide admission counselling services for various academic programs, including B.Tech, MBA, MBBS, Polytechnic, B.Ed, and NIIT, among others. We understand the significance of timely and efficient admission processes and offer admission consultants near you to assist you throughout the admission process
Explore the LBS MBA program at London Business School. Learn about admission process, tuition fees, scholarships, placements, and global career opportunities in 2025. Read more here: www.mim-essay.com/lbs-mba
.
.
.
JAWAH4.fi.L/l.l_N_EHR:U UNIVERSITY OFFICE .
QFft~t...Q.f THE DEAN OF STUDENTS .
.
25TH February 2009 .
.
.
It is unfortunate that .some students havE-prevented the sale of admission forms today thereby not only disrupting the admission process but also obstructing the normal academic and administrative f·.·nctioning of the Universi~:y. I appeal to the erring students to remove the " .
blockade wit~ immediate effect and desist from taking the law into their own hands. 1would appreci.-::te your cooperation in this regard. .
.
.
Prof.v~-.
Dean of Students .
.
.
.
.
Want to Study in Australia? Get Expert Guidance on Top Universities, Courses, Scholarships, Visa, Admission process and 2021 Intake. Register Now for free consultation! for more info visit our website:- www.global-opportunities.net/
Mount Litera Zee School Gwalior is one of the top 10 Best CBSE schools in Gwalior We are the fastest growing chain of K12 CBSE Schools
Visit Us At :- mountliteragwalior.com/admission-process
.
would accrue under the new reservation regime. The proposed reservation regime would require unaided deemed-to-be-universities to reserve seats for scheduled castes (15%), scheduled tribes (7.5%) and other backward classes (27%). .
The market fees paid by foreign students, including NRIs, would help subsidise lower fees that the institute would charge from economically and socially-backward students. .
Vice chancellors of unaided deemed-to-be-universities made this suggestion to the human resource development minister Arjun Singh at a consultation on the proposed legislation to bring unaided deemed universities under the ambit of the new reservation regime. .
The meeting was attended by eight of the 64 unaided deemed universities. VCs from Symbiosis, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, the oldest unaided deemed to be university, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Bharati Vidyapeeth and LNM Institute of Information Technology attended the meet. .
The vice chancellors also suggested that fee structuring and a structured admission process should be put in place to ensure that students do not lose out. .
The HRD minister will be discussing the suggestions with the core group of ministers which include external affairs minister Pranab Mukherjee and finance minister P Chidambaram. .
Earlier in May, at a conference of deemed universities, the vice chancellors had endorsed the 93rd constitutional amendment, which provided for reservations in all education institutions including private unaided institutes, barring minority education institutions. .
Institutions like Symbiosis, Birla Institute of Technology (BITS), Manipal Academy of Higher Education had earlier made a demand to the government to keep aside a defined percentage of seats for NRI students, the logic being that funds generated from NRI students would be utilised to subsidise the education of reserved category students. .
.