For medical graduates preparing for specialization, choosing the right counsellor is just as important as preparing for NEET PG itself. The role of a NEET PG Consultant Delhi is to guide students through the maze of counselling, documentation, and admissions. Based on insights from Oasys Education, a good consultant should be transparent, experienced, and available for personalized support. They should not only provide information but also help students make informed decisions about college preferences and quota options. Oasys Education emphasizes that the right guidance can reduce stress, prevent mistakes, and make the entire admission process smoother for students and their families.

... help their peers in the high school admissions process.

... help their peers in the high school admissions process.

... help their peers in the high school admissions process.

... help their peers in the high school admissions process.

... help their peers in the high school admissions process.

.

~-·-.

.

1' \i,.11 II' IJ lo;..

~ ,n:.

1-.

1.

J...-_._..........,. -----.

-.___ .

Resist Seat Cuts.in JNU Admissionsl .

FQJht the shameless butrayal of.

2r1o OBC resurvation and 54% seat increasell.

.

. .

Down with JNUSU Office-bearers' complicity with.

the anti-student JNU ................... .

.

Friends, .

Several problems have surfaced in the admission process of JNU for the year 2008:.

: 27% OBC reservation In one go was abandoned in favour of a phased implementation,.

.

with only 12% OBC reservation for this year..

: .

Far from the promised 54% seat increase, we are witnessing sect cuts in various ·centres.

.

and programmes of study. .

: OBC reservation has not been implemented properly in many centres and the overall.

.

percentage of students admitted under OBC reservation is unknown..

·:· The time-tested process of Intake-Offer for admissions has been shelved in favour of thefailed system of Waiting Lists. .

·:· Admissions for the reserved category of Physically Challenged students has been distorted.

.

and tampered with. .

! .

Past precedence of holding a mid way meeting of the Standing Committee on Admissions.

in order to redress any shortfall in admission before the 14th of August has been.

.

abandoned. .

.. .

And to top it all, the JNUSU office bearers from AISA are hand in glove with the JNU.

Administration in all these anti-student moves and have emerged as the biggest defenders of-.

the Administration. the JNUSU President has defended the JNU Administration in the informal.

.

Council Meeting held on 3rd August and expressed satisfaction with the current state of affairs..

HOW THE AISA-LED JNUSU BETRAYED 27% OBC RESERVATION.

The JNU Academic Council had decided in 2007 to implement 27% reservation for OBC students.

at one go, precisely because JNU already had a relatively high percentage of OBC students.

(around 20% to 21 %) owing to the deprivation points system. In fact, in 2007 the percentage of.

~ OBC students went up to 24% as noted in the minutes of the Academic Council:.

.

"The number of students belonging to the other backward castes [sic] enrolled this year.

[2007-08] has been close f9 24% which together with the students belonging to SC/ST/PH.

categories and those admitted from the socially deprived sections come to more thanhalf of the total enrolment." [p.13, Minutes of AC Meeting held on November 20, 2007].

It should be obvious that in the admissions for 2008, if the proportion of OBC students is less than.

24%, that would imply a decline in the percentage of OBC students admitted to JNU compared.

to last year. It is therefore shocking to find the JNUSU office-bearers from AISA celebrating the.

.

implementation of only 12% OBC reservations in JNU this year as a 'victory'! Whose game is AISA .

.

trying to play through such cynical manoeuvres? AISA 's proclivity towards appeasement of the.

anti-reservationists is well known. AISA had coined the notorious slogan of 'No Mandai No .

.

..,.

lllllltillra .

.

Become a Sucessful Fashion Designer!!

For #Admission_Process Call @+91-9041766699 OR Visit @

indianfashioninstitute.in

#DiplomaCourses #IIFD #IIFDAdmission #Degree #Institute

#Institutes #Fashion #Designing #Chandigarh #Punjab

#Design #Degree #Institute #Institutes #Fashion #Designing

#Chandigarh

MCA – Check our MCA course details, eligibility criteria, fees and admission process of MCA at Invertis University.

www.invertisuniversity.ac.in/courses/master-computer-appl...

.

' .

.

1 I .

.

.: i:. . . .

constitution~lly guarante·ed reservations in the .

admission ijst of C~TD, .Spanish, German centres.

intake ofstudents. .

····...·. .etc. It was A/SA which sought to settle the Issue.

·f In Delhi University,· even after the MHRD of the reduction' I of viva voce marks.

directive (directive in respqr:1se to a delegation 0 in.

admissions with academic council deciding to.

from the student commu"nlt.y) to the University; .. setting up a committee with representation.

1 .

I .

the DU administra.:iv'l sought to play 'Hide·and from A/SA-led JNUSU on 19th March 2012, the.

! · .

Seek' with ~he reservation Policy.· ·. follow up ofwhich was completely negative.. . ...An RTI conducted in around. 30Therefore,.

· the present anomaly.

co~leges in 2P~O.

revealed that on an average General Category in.

. . the.

reservation policy ofJNU has to do more with.

seats were filled in excess by 30% of thesanctioned strength. It was also revealed that the role. of JNUSU led by !4/SA. It was A/SA.

who pione~red the slogan of 'No Manda/ No;in the very same. coll~ges Reserved ·category..

a . Kainandai.J/sm'' , strengthseats were . Ifilled ·30% below ·ttie san'ctioned . . in 1990s. The improper' implementation .ofconstitutionally mandated.reservations .

.in various centresThus, the anti-reservation in this.

lobby .

in the academic session not only vindicated A/SA-ian.

University has been robbing. the seats from the .

commitment.

. . . to ' No .

Mandalism-No.

SC, ST, and OB~ students·and depriving them . .the 15, 7.5, and 27 percentages 9t--seats Kamandal-ism', but also the ineffectiveness of' provided the A/SA-ian rhetoric in JNU.by the Central · Ecfucational ~ ..

Institutions (Reservations in Admission) Act of . -2006. .

I) Similarly the issue of 'drop outs' is a significant.thing which the AISA has forgotten. The recent.

-·.

.The student' community In Delhi ·Universitli years has seen a rise in the 'drop out' rates in.

.... ' had to go for indefinite relay hun·ger strike. JNU . .

The CAG report pointed to 40% drop 9ut.

1 .

with the open support .of DUSU le.ad by NSUI, · rates in School of Languages to which AISA led.,, to which the DU adn:Jinistratfon had ·.to bring JNUSU did no~ positively respond., an official ·or:der so as to ensure fair and.

" .. proper impleme'ntation of constitutionally It · AISA's role regarding scholarships is dubious..

mandated reservations in the admissions for.

.. .

1 SC/ST/and OBCstudents.: On the one hand, the duration of non-NET UGC.

I fellowships from 5 years to entire duration of a.

. Phd Course is not·done, and on the other handOn the other hand in JNU, a ·look into the . . . I I current year's admission process would reveal nothing concrete has been done to increasea dismal .

picture withimplementation an improper the MCM scholarships. It was NSUI's struggleof reservations and interventions which Jed to the increase in.

· {SC/ST/OBC/PH) in Mphii/Phd admissions. This .

the Mphif/Phd Scholarships from 3000 to.

; not only has brought to light, the extent to .

5000-5000 to 8000 respectively. It is very.

,. lwhich the anti-reservation l~bby can scuttle ironic that A/SA is still making bogus claim on.

the goal of social justice, but also exposed the .

.,·. 1 dubious role of AISA led JNUSU, When· the this landmark achievement which the NSUJIconstitutionally ..

mandated reservations has brought about in this .campus..

for ·.

1OBC-SC-ST-PH categories are 27,15J.:S ·and 3 .

.·percentages respectively, The infrastructure is another burning concern.

the · actualpercentage of students in the admission list in JNU right now. JNU has been declared as the1belonging to the respective ca~egories are .

1 19.63, best University of our country. It Is very.

11.42, 5.82, pathetic to know that the lnfrastructural status.

2.39 .

percentages .

' respect. ivelv.. Of this. criminal inj~:Jstice in the.

.

adniissiqn p.rocess; it is ·shocking·..that there in. JNU. is. in. a djsmal phase. The more than 40have been no SC/ST and OBC s~udents in the years of LEFT led student union functioning. . under the leadership ofSF/ and A/SA did neverbrought to the centre stage, the concern of .· .

. .

.:: ' . . .

.

In Order To Succeed We Must First Believe That We Can!!

Admissions Open For 2018-2019

For #Admission_Process Call @+91-9041766699 OR Visit @ iifd.in/

.

#Admission2018 #IIFD #Chandigarh #FashionDesigning #IIFDStudents #CreativeIdea #InteriorDesigning #TextileDesigning #IIFD #IIFDChandigarh

Talent means nothing, while experience, acquired in humility and with hard work, means everything.

Admissions Open For 2017-2018

For #Admission_Process Call @+91-9041766699 OR Visit @

iifd.in/

.

#Admission2018 #IIFD #Chandigarh #FashionDesigning #IIFDStudents #CreativeIdea #InteriorDesigning #TextileDesigning #IIFD #IIFDChandigarh

Hearing a presentation from Admissions about the university & admissions process

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();

Adamjee Cantonment College HSC Admission Result Notice 2017. Adamjee Cantonment College HSC Admission Notice 2017-18 publicised today. ACC HSC Admission process has got started both ENGLISH and BANGLA version as per Dhaka Education...

www.careerjetbd.com/adamjee-cantonment-college-hsc-admiss...

.

---~ .

-.

NATIONAL STUDENTS' UNION Of INDIA .

Reject obsolete ideologies, vote for those who care for JNU /!! .

.

NSUI once again congratulates the student community of JNU for successfully leading the movement for campus democracy and bringing back the historic JNUSU Election process. In the last three years, the JNU student communitY has been witness to an authoritarian regime run by the administration. Since there wasn't an elected JNUSU. the administration was somehow successful in its anti student agenda. During this period, while the communist organizations were busy blaming each other, the NSUI stood up to the students cause. Installing wi-fi facility in JNU campus, a fully functional SBI branch, bringing out second admission list, single window and online admission process, new hostels, new ambulance for the health centre, introduction of UGC Non-NET scholarship, Maulana Azad and Rajiv Gancihi Scholarship are some of the achievements of .

NSU1. .

All these demands were met because of the strong persistence of NSUI activists. However, there are many issues and demands which have not been fulfilled yet. A fully functional placement cell, increase in MCM and UGC Non-NET fellowship, RGNF to all SC/ST, PH and VH students, a 24x7 functional library, fully functiona I and 24x 7 health centre with permanent doctors, better facilities .

in hostels, increase in RGNF and Maulana Azad fellowships, internal bus service and metro feeder buses etc are some of the issues that require immediate attention. NSUI is committed to fight for these demands in the interest of the students. We need a strong JNUSU for getting these demands materialized. While there are organizations in this campus who are more concerned about a Jasmine or a Tulip Revolution taking place somewhere in the world than thinking about getting a 24x7 health centre or library, NS Ul prioritizes JNU specific issues. NSUI proudly presents our .

candidates for JNUSU elections 2012: .

' President: Murad Ahamad .

Vice President: Reetika Dutta .

General Secreatary: Manoranjan Mohapatra .

Joint Secretary: Devdhar Dadhich .

.

.

.

02-12 .

. .

1m1r. .

·n camps lance in ,·ith the trained g them rt and 'ate of .

LS m .

2nd is .

-:ratic .

Jn of .

.

1d as .

'ling .

and .

nan .

.

mu .

!ll, .

ry .

I! .

If if r, r. .

t .

r t .

if .

A' .

tt .

.

if) .

~ .

~I .

~ .

~ .

.

~ .

~ .

' 1'1'm, .

em .

.

~ .

lr1lr .

f~ .

~ .

.

IJ .

.

.

.

.

Do You Want To Be A Fashion Designer

Choose Your Course and Speak with our Expert Counselor. For #Admission_Process Call @+919041766699 OR Visit @ iifd.in/

.

Find us on Map-

Chandigarh:- g.page/IIFD-Chandigarh

Mohali:- g.page/IIFDMohaliCampus

#IIFD #IIFDAdmission

FREE COUNSELLING!!!

Admission Open for 2017-18

Explore your Dreams with the Superlative #Fashion #Designing Institute #IIFD_Chandigarh.

For #Admission_Process Call @+919041766699 OR Visit @ iifd.in/

.

Find us on Map-

Chandigarh:- g.page/IIFD-Chandigarh

Mohali:- g.page/IIFDMohaliCampus

#IIFD #CHANDIGARH

Opportunities don't happen. You create them!!!

Become a Successful Fashion Designer!!

For #Admission_Process Call @+91-9041766699 OR Visit @ indianfashioninstitute.com/fashion-designing-courses/

indianfashioninstitute.com/interior-design-courses/

indianfashioninstitute.com/textile-design-courses/

#DegreeCourses #DiplomaCourses #IIFD #IIFDAdmission #AdmissionOpen

.

5 .

The slabs specified can be additionally verified by taking into account the school fees .

paid in the institution from which the can~idate has completed higher secondary schooling. .

So the maximum level ofdeprivation points would be for a female candidate from the .

SC/ST Community regionally backward on all 3 counts,. economically most deprived or for a .

female OBC candidate regionally backward on all 3 counts, economically most deprived the .

magnitude being 8+7+5=5+5+5+5=20. The deprivation points would be awarded on a scale of .

hundred. The crucial point is that deprivation points will be cumulative and there will be no .

.

trade-offbetween categories. .

(e) "Special care should be taken to ensure that admission at the M.PruUPh.D. level do not get .

This should, however, not lead to therestricted to those holding the Master' Degree ofthe JNU. This category of students has been .

educated in the JNU environment and would have generally on edge over others in the .

assessment of suitability for research in this milieu. .

.

negation ofthe All India character of the University especiaJiy in the light of the fact that the .

catchment area for admission at this stage is far wider than at the M.A. stage." ( Academic .

Council Resolution on admissions policy 1982, paragraph 11) The interview for M.PhiV Ph.D. .

students should gauge their research intentions and therefore be centered around their .

.

synopSJS. .

(f) As far as foreign ..;tudents are concerned, their fees should be indexed to the Human .

Development Index of their respective countries so as to ensure that students from. the developing countries are able to acquire higher education at JNU. .

A. From the merit list of the adrrussion test add the gender deprivation points and select the .

.

2. ~iode ofselvction ofcandidates: Let us suppose 100 candidates have to be selected: .

top 35, irrespective oftheir category. .

B. Then add the deprivation points (ofall other types) and select the top 40 from only among .

those who are eligil>le for deprivation points i,e. now the list will not include those who are not eligible for deplivation points. .

C. Lastly select the top 22.5% candidates from among the list ofremaining SC/ST candidates. .

D. 3% ofseats will be reserved for PH category candidates .

(SFCs): The SFCs had played a pivotal role in the implementation of Old Admission Policy. .

3. Transparency in the Admission Process and the Role of Student .Faculty Committees .

With the undermining of the latter the SFCs were also considerably weakened. To ensure the .

competent to play their due role. Transparency can only be ensured ifstudent participation in success of a progressive admission pulicy the SFCs have to be revitalised and become .

the admission process is possible. This will involve initiatives at the level of the Centre and .

prescribing certain general guide lines. We propose th~ following in the light of the latter .

I) The criteria for admission used in interview by the Centre should be discussed in the SFC .

.

consideration: .

meeting which should be held before the interviews .

.

II) The scores in the admission test and interview (wherever held) should be made public .

separately and compuh;orily. (and not only on request) ~ III) Student representative of SFC to sit on the interview boards to avoid victimisation of students. .

.

IIMT Group of College is the top ranked college in Greater noida, Delhi NCR. It is the best college in Greater noida among top 15 aktu colleges in India.

BAF Shaheen College HSC admission Notice Result 2017. BAF Shaheen College HSC admission s 2017 are sure to start at 9 May 2017. Created by year in BAF Shaheen College HSC admission process can be held each of those in online and SMS system on both BANGLA and even ENGLISH medium sized. Necessary...

www.jobbarta.com/baf-shaheen-college-hsc-admission/

Here you can learn about the international student admission process, academic standing, extracurricular activities, specific department or program. Contact us for more info!

www.eluniversity.co.za/program-environment/

Design Is Not Just What It Like Design Is How It Works!!

Become a Successful Fashion Designer!!

For #Admission_Process Call @+91-9041766699 OR Visit @ indianfashioninstitute.com/fashion-designing-courses/

indianfashioninstitute.com/interior-design-courses/

indianfashioninstitute.com/textile-design-courses/

#DegreeCourses #DiplomaCourses #IIFD #IIFDAdmission #AdmissionOpen

Education consultants are essential for studying MBBS abroad because they provide invaluable guidance on choosing the right university, navigate complex admission processes, assist with visa applications, and offer insights into foreign cultures. Their expertise ensures a smoother transition and increases the chances of a successful academic journey.

Visit the Link to know more: dreammbbs.in/why-do-you-need-the-education-consultants-fo...

Did you Know?

Every Year, Louis Vuitton burn their Unsold products instead of making an Offering at a Discount.

Join IIFD & Make a Career in A Creative Field.

For #Admission_Process Call @+919041766699 OR Visit @ iifd.in/

.

Find us on Map-

Chandigarh:- g.page/IIFD-Chandigarh

Mohali:- g.page/IIFDMohaliCampus

#IIFD_CHANDIGARH

.

.

18 March AC Meeting: Ensure Social Justice! .

16.3.11 Demand Administrative Accountability !! .

.

JNU Academic Council (AC) will be meeting after one whole year on March 18th (coming Friday). For the past few years, the entire JNU community has witnessed a gross breakdown of JNUs democratic decision-making process as well as a visible decline of JNUs credibility as a public institution upholding certain basic ethical and democratic values. The manner in which the JNU administration has been scuttling the proper implementation of the legally mandated OBC reser-vations in JNU in a shameful display of institutionalised casteism is a prime example of this phenomenon. The upcoming AC meeting is therefore crucial - it is high time that those people responsible for JNUs loss of credibility, and for scuttling of social justice in this institution known for its democratic credentials, are held accountable. .

What exactly is at stake? .

Over the past three years, more than 400 OBC students have been denied admission in JNU for NO fault of theirs, but simply because of JNUs faulty admission process. 277 students were denied admission last year alone. Who is responsible for this criminal injustice? .

Since 2008, JNUSU, the student community, and several faculty members have been demanding a change in JNUs faulty cut-off criteria. When the administration went to the extent of even subverting an AC decision in its single-minded agenda to scuttle OBC reservations, the victimized students were forced to approach the Delhi High Court for justice. The Delhi High Court (HC), in its 7th September judgment, had REJECTED JNUs admission policy on OBC reservations. .

Instead of implementing the HC verdict in JNU, and moving towards correcting JNUs policy, the JNU administration shockingly chose to challenge this verdict in the High Court and filed a REVIEW PETITION in the Delhi HC against the 7th September verdict. Subsequently, on December 23rd 2010, the HC once again upheld its 7th September verdict and dis-missed JNUs review petition. This raises certain very important questions: .

.

JNU, despite being a public funded institution is behaving like a private individual litigant, challenging an existing law which it is legally bound to accept and implement. .

.

.

The JNU administration decided to independently and unilaterally move the HC to challenge the 7th September verdict without the mandate of any university body. Clearly, neither the Deans Committee, the Standing Committee on Admissions, JNU Academic Council or any other statutory decision-making body has been consulted on this issue. This is a highly dangerous trend, with far-reaching repercussions for JNUs transparent and democratic decision-making process. .

.

.

JNU administration is fighting all these legal cases to SCUTTLE OBC reservation by SPENDING PUBLIC FUNDS. In other words, a central university is not just overruling its own decision-making bodies, it is subsequently trying to justify its unilateral policies by spending public funds! Why should funds meant for the development of the university be spent to defend an administrations ideological predilections? Can any administration be allowed a free hand to misuse public funds in this manner? .

.

.

Time and again, JNUs admission policy has been held to be illegal in the court of law (first in the 7th September judgment, and again on 23rd December 2010). In these cases, the court held that JNU should offer admission to the litigant students. And still JNU refuses to offer admission to all the victimized students! Should a central university create such an unprecedented situation wherein every student eligible for admission is forced to move the courts, fight a long legal battle, and prove once more that JNU is legally in the wrong?.

.

.

Justice must prevail for all students, not just for those who are able to fight long and expensive cases in the court. It is the responsiblity and duty of public institutions to change their faulty policies and not wait for each and every victim to force them individually to deliver justice. .

There is another critical issue at stake, which too reflects JNU administrations typical casteist mindset to scuttle fulfilment of OBC seats. The JNU administration is trying is set a low quantum of relaxation viz. the qualifying/cut-off marks fixed for MPhil/ PhD are 40 for general and 35 OBC students and for BA/MA, it is 30 for general and 27 for OBC students. This is arbitrary and once again violative of the Supreme Court directives, which categorically states that a maximum relaxation of 10 % - which is 10 marks in an evaluation of 100 marks- should be provided to fill all the OBC seats. .

Recognition for More Madarsas: When madarsa certificates were first recognized in the 30 April 2008 AC meeting, it was decided that recognition would gradually be expanded to include new madarsas too. This has not yet happened. The coming AC, as per the decision of the 30 April, 2008 AC meeting, must expedite the process of recognition of more madarsas across the country. .

At the upcoming AC meeting on March 18th 2011, these issues have to be addressed if JNUs democratic credentials and commitment to social inclusion are to be defended. Apart from offering admission to all the victimised students, and setting the correct cut-off criteria (in keeping with the 7th Sep HC verdict), the quantum of cut-off should also be correctly assigned. .

In an All Organisation Meeting called by AISA last night, it was decided that a joint PUBLIC MEETING on all these issues will be held on 17 March and a united Protest Demonstration will be held in front of the AC Meeting on 18 March. AISA appeals to the student community to strengthen the ongoing struggle to ensure proper implementation of OBC reservations and expanding other steps of social inclusion in JNU! .

Shephalika, President, AISA, JNU Sucheta, Gen.Secy., AISA, JNU .

.

.

.

.

.

JNU Administration Reconfirms Its Casteist Character Once Again! .

Deans Committee Decision on Cut-Off Criteria for OBC Reservation Upturned -.

JNU Reverts Back to Its Earlier Faulty Cut-Off Criteria Under YFE Diktats! .

Unite To Defeat This Casteist Ploy To Scuttle OBC Reservation ! .

In a most shocking move today, the JNU administration has yet again attempted to tamper with the proper implementation of OBC reservations and social justice in JNU. As the student community is well aware, a decision was taken at the Deans committees meeting of 17th June 2010 in favour of an admissions model that would ensure correct implementation of OBC reservations and fulfilment of OBC seats. Today (12th July), almost a month after this decision in favour of correct implementation of OBC reservations, the JNU administration called a hasty meeting of the same Deans Commit-tee, where its earlier decision was upturned and revoked. The Deans Committee has now recommended that the JNU administration continue to follow the faulty, illegal recommendations of the Aditya Mukherjee committee which have led to massive non-fulfilment of OBC seats for the past two years. .

This decision was apparently taken after a legal notice was sent by YFEs advocate Puneet Jain to the JNU administra-tion claiming that the admission model that JNU is planning to follow this year is illegal and violative of the Supreme Court directives vis-à-vis implementation of OBC reservations. Based on this legal notice, the JNU administration sought the legal advice of two more lawyers (Mohinder JS Rupal and PP Rao). Both these lawyers as well as the JNU administrations own lawyer (not surprisingly) came to the opinion that the Deans Committee had taken an illegal and wrong decision on June 17th and that JNU had indeed been following a correct model for the past two years! Therefore, the JNU administration called another meeting of the Deans Committee, and the earlier decision was revoked in effect ratifying the administrations incorrect implementation of OBC reservations. Let us not forget that todays decision is also a shameful rejection of JNUs own Academic Councils decision to do away with the Aditya Mukherjee Committees recommendations on OBC reservation. .

The JNU administration might try to explain and justify this shocking and shameful volte-face, but the REAL reason is crystal clear. May we ask the JNU administration: if indeed there was some legal ambiguity why did the administration not seek ANY legal advice in the four long months since the AC meeting of 18th March, where the Aditya Mukherjee Committees recommendations were clearly rejected? Why did the administration wait till the last minute, when all the results are ready and when the admission process is underway? .

May we also remind and warn the administration: a legal notice or a mere letter from a single lawyer questioning the legalityof the JNU admissions process DOES NOT amount to a legal injunction, or a stay order from a court. It is merely the opinion expressed by a lawyer if the casteist lobby can bring a couple of lawyers to defend its casteist interpretation of the Supreme Court judgement, the progressive sections in JNU can (and in fact have already done so) provide legal recommen-dations questioning the administrations position. It is indeed shameful that the JNU administration has wilfully chosen to selectively use legal opinion suitable to its well known casteist agenda! .

The student community has not forgotten that ever since the Deans Committee came up with its decision in favour of correct implementation of OBC reservations, the YFE has consistently been attacking this decision. In the past week, YFE has come up with two leaflets abusing the Deans Committees pro-reservation decision. In its posters, the YFE had called the Deans Committees decision illegal and had in fact threatened to serve a legal notice against JNU. It is therefore obvious that the casteist lobby constituted by YFE and some sections in the faculty as well as in the JNU administration have together conspired to once more bring up the bogey of legal ambiguity to scuttle proper implementation of OBC reservations. What we have witnessed today is a well-thought out, well-planned game plan by the anti-reservation lobby. .

The timing of Deans Committees volte-face also reveals the dubious game plan of this casteist lobby: Had the Deans Committee not given a favourable verdict in June, the JNU administration was well aware that it would have to face massive opposition and resistance from progressive sections in JNU (including students as well as teachers). The administra-tion knew full well that its position was legally untenable the protracted debate in this campus on the correct method of implementation of OBC reservations had already been clearly clinched. Therefore, the only way out for the casteist lobby in the administration to once more scuttle OBC reservations was to wait till the last minute, and THEN create spurious confusion over some purported legal ambiguity! .

It is now the second week of July, and the evaluations of all the examination papers have been completed. JNU is on the verge of announcing its results for 2010-2011 and clearly, those opposed to social justice and reservations in the administra-tion have realised that the OBC quota is going to be fulfilled this year. And since this is complete anathema to the anti-reservationists, they have come up with this new ploy to delay the implementation of OBC reservations this year too. .

The JNU administration seems determined and hell-bent to cross all limits in its single-minded endeavour to scuttle OBC reservations and social justice in JNU. It is determined to undermine every single democratic decision-making body in the campus from the Deans Committee, to the Academic Council, to the Executive Council in its attempt to scuttle reservations. Nothing could be more shameful for an institution of JNUs reputation, which has had the long tradition of upholding social justice and fighting to ensure equality and democracy. .

Ravi Prakash, Vice-President, AISA, JNU Atif, Jt. Secy., AISA, JNU .

.

.

We Bake Dreams Into Great Career!!!

Admission Open (2017 - 2018)

For #Admission_Process Call @+91-9041766699 OR Visit @ iifd.in/

indianfashioninstitute.in

indianfashioninstitute.com/fashion-designing-courses

indianfashioninstitute.com/interior-design-courses

indianfashioninstitute.com/textile-design-courses

#DegreeCourses #DiplomaCourses #IIFD #IIFDAdmission #Degree #Institute #Institutes #Fashion #Designing #Chandigarh #Punjab #Interior #Design #Degree #Institute #Institutes #Fashion #Designing #Chandigarh

Read more here

.

.

.... .

.

[ .

' Defeat t he Rhetoric Politics of AISA led JNUSU H Reject t~te Opportunism of SFI-~-'SFI-JNU' U Vote for an Accountable JNUSU this time II .

.

Vote, Support and Elect NSUI Candidates for JNUSU I .

,-.

ww ~dt. ~~Ar5A ltJ. JNUSU n .

Failed to implement constitutionally ntandated 27 °/o OBC Reservations? -Failed to stop the Discrimination of OBC-Daiit Students in the admission Process ? .

No Metro Feeder Buses in JNU? .

lnfrasttucture-Hostel Crisis Persisting ? .

Opposition to Placen1ent Cells? .

No increase in the MCM Scholarships ? .

.

.. .

President :Iqbal Singh Sandhu .

Vice President: Neetam Poonia .

.

' .

Gen.Secretarv:ShashiKantPandev .

. I .

I.

Joint Secretarv :Sandeen Triuathi I I .

I .

l .

4 .

.

Did You Know???

1st Needle Invented 30,000 Years Ago That Was Made Out Of Animal Bone!!!

#IIFD #FashionFact

Become a Sucessful Fashion Designer!!

For #Admission_Process Call @+91-9041766699 OR Visit @ iifd.in/

indianfashioninstitute.in

indianfashioninstitute.com/fashion-designing-courses

indianfashioninstitute.com/interior-design-courses

indianfashioninstitute.com/textile-design-courses

#DegreeCourses #DiplomaCourses #IIFD #IIFDAdmission #Degree #Institute #Institutes #Fashion #Designing #Chandigarh #Punjab #Interior #Design #Degree #Institute #Institutes #Fashion #Designing #Chandigarh

Admission Process 2017 for Agricultural College Dolphinlifesciences in Chandigarh. Your Minimum Qualification should be 10+2 and Marks obtained You get for Eligibility Cretria in college. visit online our college website and fill the form if you want to take admission in Dolphincollegelifesciences.

www.rmcedu.com/study-medical-in-china.html

Study MBBS in China is very easy for Indian Medical Studies. Because admission process in Chinese Medical University/College is very easy for Indian Students. All Chinese Medical University or Medical Collage get Direct Admission without Donation and without any entrance exam qualifying. All most Maximum Chinese University or Collage Approved by MCI(Medical Council of India) and WHO (World Health Origination). Chinese Medical University Provide worldwide Certificate. If you get Medical degree from China so can apply in any country for post graduation degree. If you are complete 5 year MBBS in china so you come back India for One year Internship.

The graduate Record Examinations (GRE) is a standardized test that is an admissions requirement for most graduate schools is in the United States. Almost all graduate schools in United States require GRE results as part of the admissions process.

www.kiec.edu.np/

MATS University Distance Education established in the year 2006 located in Raipur Chhattisgarh. MATS Online Admission Process Open For the Current Session 2021. And full information about courses, admissions and eligibility criteria.

Contact us at +91 9625266808

.

JAWAHARLAL NI:.M~u--u.,..........._ __ .

.

\ .

Strengthen the Struggle for Social Justice and Transparency in JNU Admissions! .

Implements 27°/o Reservation and 54°/o seat Increase in JNU without delay .

Accept Aleeff1iyat and Fazeelat and other Madarsa certificates in BA 1st year admissions .

J-Ensure Transparency in Academic and Admission Processes .

Join PROTEST DEMO. .

F .

.

Administrative Block 18.1.07 4.00pm gti Sandeep Singh, Gen. Secy. JNUSU .

T .

Sl .

tl· JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' UNION.

c1 .

Strengthen the Struggle for Social Justice and Transparency in JNU Admissions! .

I .

Implements 27°/o Reservation and 54°/o seat Increase in JNU without delay .

b. .

Accept Aleemiyat and Fazeelat and other Madarsa certificates in BA 1st year admissions .

al. .

T.

.1. .

Ensure Transparency in Academic and Admission Processes .

P'.

-I Join PROTEST DEMO. .

l..!.

I .

, I .

--w Administrative Block 18.1.07 4.00pm Sandeep Singh, Gen. Secy. JNUSU .

-a: b--f ..

l.

C\ .

.

-.

0..

ct. .

-JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' UNION .

ll .

al Strengthen the Struggle for Social Justice and Transparency in JNU Admissions!.

>:»·--.

H Implements 27°/o Reservation and 54°/o seat Increase in JNU without delay p< Accept Aleemiyat and Fazeelat and other Madarsa certificates in BA 1st year admissions .

Ensure Transparency in Academic and Admission Processes.

-.

Join PROTEST DEMO. .

Friends Administrative Block 18.1.07 4.00pm w Sandeep Singh, Gen. Secy. JNUSU, Parliarr instituti not co .

~orthcc .

infrastn .

the ad .

.

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' UNION .

admiss .

Strengthen the Struggle for Social Justice and Transparency in JNU Admissions! by the no initi .

Implements 27°/o Reservation and 54%, seat Increase in JNU without delay .

comm .

Accept Aleemiyat and Fazeelat and other Madarsa certificates in BA 1st year admissions 11 .

the lor .

Ensure Transparency in Academic and Admission Processes .

attack .

Join PROTEST DEMO..

the wl .

admin .

.

Administrative Block 18.1.07 4.00pm .

achie" Sandeep Singh, Gen. Secy. JNUSU .

sleep c .

which .

to the.

JNUSU .

.

1 .

.

Integrated BA and LLB – Check our Integrated BA and LLB course details, eligibility criteria, fees and admission process of Integrated BA and LLB at Invertis University.

.

---------·-----~-----~------~--.,., .h ,,r_;-, _4..... _ .

On the other hand, the YFE councillors are also sabotaging the functioning of JNUSU Council byrefusing to sign the quorum sheets if OBC reservation & seat increase is one of the agendas. We.

warn YFE against such tactics and urge upon the students of the respective schools to build sufficient.

pressure on their respective councillors to attend the council meeting so that demands of all theschools can be included in the JNUSU Charter. The SFI demands that the following demands shouldbe added to the charter of demands which the JNUSU would formulate in the Council meeting tonightand a strong movement should be built on an urgent basis to fulfil the entire charter of demands..

Implement 27% OBC reservation and 54% seat increase from the next academic session withproper infrastructural facilities..

Ensure democratic formulation of the 11th plan of the university in consultation with all sections ofthe university community..

Recognition of Alimiyat and Fazilat degrees for admission to BA 15t year courses in the university..

Formulation of the committee to increase the MCM for BA/MA students to Rs1500, raising the.

income cap to Rs 1 lakh per annum and increasing the amount paid in Earn While you Learn.

Scheme to Rs 50 per hour..

Immediate disbursal of Rs 3000 and Rs 5000 scholarships announced by the UGC for M Phil,.

Ph D students..

Expedite the process of implementing other scholarships announced by the central governmentand the UGC like the Maulana Azad Scholarship and Single Girl Child Scholarship..

Restore the number of CSIR scholarships for research scholars..

Increase the readership allowance for visually challenged students..

Ratify the rules and procedures of the GSCASH immediately. Set up a mechanism to bring gender.

violence under the purview of GSCASH..

Formulate a committee to strengthen and democratize the Equal Opportunity Office..

Ensure transparency in the admission process. Make public the marks of M Phil written and Vivaexams. Make sure that the caste of the candidate is not known to the interview panel..

Convert the women's study programme into a full fledged Centre, institute scholarships for thosedoing research on gender issues..

Ensure all the rights of daily wage and casual workers in JNU..

Stop corporate funding in the academics of the university..

Open the Health centre on Sundays as promised last year..

Increase the timings of the Library; open the TB section for 24 hours..

Institute a publishing house for the university like other reputed universities..

Make the functioning of Placement Cell effective and accountable..

Start a translation division in the university which would translate standard academic works into.

various regional languages..

Buy a bus for the university and ensure regular service to down campus and different libraries inDelhi. .

Regulate the rates of print out and photo copy shops in the campus..

Immediately start the construction of new hostels..

Democratically prepare environment-friendly master plan..

Start full-fledged functioning of SBI branch and a new ATM at Poorvanchal; and other demands..

All the school level demands..

We appeal to the student community to rally behind the JNUSU to pressurise the administration to.

fulfil all our genuine demands. .

STUDENTS' UNITY LONG LIVE!.

Sd/-Rajiv Kr. Ranjan, Secretary, JNU-SFI Sd/-Roshan Kishore, President, JNU-SFI .

2 .

.

.

.

\ .

... .

,· .

,·· ·.1! [M ' i!; 1 ..~ ·~· ·' .

. 'l ..

.~ .:. .

,. .

;· r;;p. .

.

-EIIFOSE THE BINIRUPTCV Of JNII!:IIttanrn......_.

Dn1a1u ··· ........._-.

found to be unfulfi.lled after l41h August, nothing can qe done about it. Can one play with thefuture of students in such a cavalier manner?.

WHY TAMPERING WITH 3% RESERVATIONS FOR PH STUDENTS?.

According to the Indira Sawhney judgement of 1993, the admission of PH students has always.

been horirontal. But in the name of implementing horizontal reservations for P·H students, the JNU.

administration cannot fail to fulfill the entire quota of 3% for PH students. Duped by the JNUAdministration's logic, the JNUSU office-bearers have resorted to making false claims of havingchallenged the implementation of horizontal reservations in the Academic Council. This iscomplete bunkum. We challenge the JNUSU office bearers from AISA to mak~ the minutes of theAC meellng public, where their dissent regarding this has been noted. It is only when the.

differently abled students have raised their voice, supported by other organisations, that this.

issue has been redressed. .

JNUSU OFFICE-BEARERS HAVE FAILED .

It is clear from the above that the JNUSU office-bearers from the AISA have failed to live up tothe election mandate and have in effect frittered away the hard won rights of the JNU studentcommunity. The JNUSU office-bearers have kept the student community totally in the darkregarding crucial decisions related to this year's admission process in JNU. The desperateattempts currently being moue by the JNUSU President and ther;.AISA to justify the moves of theadministration and spread confusion within the student community make their complicity. in theJNU odminislratjon's gome amply clear. SFI warns the JNUSU President and the.AISA against.

siding with the anfi-student moves of the JNU administration, which will not be accepted by the.

student community. .

There are several issues related to this year's admissions which need to be understood andresolved in a way so that the interests of the student community, particularly those belonging todeprived sections, are protected. In view of this, the SFI is putting forward the following demands,which need to be met in order to redress the problems in this year's admission process..

SFI DEMANDS: .

.

1. A meeting of the Standing Committee on Admissions should ~be called immediately totake stock of how many students have joined so for. The date of thi"S emergency meetingshould be such that there is enough time before the last date (141h August) to bring further.

lists to fulfill the seat requirements. .

2. Since the total number of seats for M .Phii/Ph.D programm,e has decreased for many of tt~_eCenfres, these seats should be increased such that 18% more students join this yearcompared to last year. There should be no seat decrease under any circumst·ances in anyof the centres. .

3. The OBC quota should be fulfilled for all the programmes and centres..

4. There should be 3% quota for PH students on the basis of the total seats announced for.

each of the centres. 3% of 1867(total seats for 2008 as per JNUSU) comes to 56 seats..

SFI appeals to the student community to rally behind these legitimate demands and build a.

powerful movement to force the JNU administration to accept them. SFI calls upon the JNUSU to.

endorse these demands and lead the struggle in defence of student rights. JNUSU Councillors.

from SFI -would spearhead the struggle in case the JNUSU office-bearers continue with their.

shameless complicity with the JNU Administration. .

Sd/-.

P.K. Anand Sd/-President, SFI-JNU Unit RoshanSecretory, SFI-JNU Unit .

.... .

; II.

r: ~:.l..i,.J;" '11 i'\IQil ;·· ._, ,\ !::t.:·· ....rJ .; -~\ .

;.~ "'"U. .

j.

.. ! '· , ···,,:~::nil,~',.

I,. .

·'i '.1':" rit I ~-··'"'.

,, 1. : rr . :..

I' :-.:;4*/~; ,ft~-~~ .

N O .

I.' .J.:!; 11~·-·.~. . fj :·.

. :rr·l .

.1,-1 i.rr;,!;f': i .:.: ~>~'"~!-P.' ·~ :1t 'T 'f · . . '.

it;.ll.i.;ol.ii '~. -~ tt' ··: 1.1··w····ili' ... ..

I ~ ~~~~-~-.

,.·, .....' ...o,..l~~.~: J'.-,, V!. '· ~· 1 .

·,;---~.

\ " ·· lT' .. 1.1 '; .

~,~:· .

.

.

.... ·=-....., ..Jiry pro(;ess IS undermined~. -··u....,., ~~"'A::JH, so rnat neither its-=-v;;;n~tstudents and Teachers to join a .

m anyway. Towards this end, we request the .

ll~llfjll$$~ .

Join A Teacher-Student.

Dialogue on .

Faculty Participants.

Academic Inclusion And Prof. Valerian RodriguesCPSRejuvenation In SSS: The Prof. Arun Kumar CESP.

Question Of Language Dr. Ajay GudavarthyCPS .

Dr. Arvind Mishra ZHCES.

2.014-.

Dr. Vivek Kumar csss.

5 March Today Dr. Maninder Thakur CPS.

SSS -I Auditorium 2:00 p.m. .

and others .

JNU in its admission policy categorically states that "the University shall:.

(i) foster the composite culture of India and establish such departments or institutions as may be required for thestudy and development of the languages, arts and culture of India; .

'· .

(ii) take special measure~to facilitate students and teachers from all over India to join the University and participate.

in its academic programmes; .

(iii) promote in the students and teachers an awareness and understanding ofthe social needs ofthe country andprepare them for fulfilling such needs; .... " .

JNU student community and its teachers have time and again fought for and achieved significant policy level provisions.

which has ensured that higher education in our times do not remain a privilege of the already privileged few. Our constant.

struggle for inclusion-be it the deprivation points in admissions, the recognition of madarsa certificates, or the correct.

.

implementation of '.

cut-off' in OBC reservation-have made sure t_hat students from diverse backgrounds have access to· learning in JNU. However, today we encounter a situation wherein students from deprived backgrounds in JNU feel thatinclusion is limited to the admission process only. Once admitted, students experience a situation in which languagebecomes a barrier in all activities-from socialisation to the realisation of their academic potential. In some cases, students.

are contemplating that they should leave the university. This defeats the very purpose of having deprivation points and.

having examination in regional languages. .

In this age of exclusion where market forces drive the way higher education is imparted, constant interrogation and.

struggle have ensuredthat JNU still remains one of the last few institutions where students from humble backgrounds can.

.

think of availing affordable and quality education. In many ways, the JNU environment offers novel experiences which.

students in most colleges and schools of India have not witnessed earlier. However, the purpose of inclusion is defeated if.

a student from deprived background faces demoralisation, depression, exclusion and a sense of inferiority. JNU caters to.

.

students educated not just in English but also to those who are from non-English medium background including madrasas..

JNU caters to students educated not just in English but also to those who are from non-English medium background.

including madrasas. The medium ofinstruction in JNU is English. The Linguistic Empowerment Cell which was constituted.

to bridge this divide has not been able to do so effectively Translated versions ofreading material are not available. There.

.

is no uniform system ofallowing students to write the semester exams in languages other than English. We want themechanisms ofinclusion to be institutionalised so that inclusion becomes the norm and not the exception..

At a time when the trend in social sciences is to value knowledge ofthe hitherto excluded sections ofthe society, theirlanguages and cultures, can the knowledge of regional languages not be seen as an added asset in the teaching andlearning of social science disciplines? What can we do, so that the language barrier isn.

't allowed to prevent the fulldevelopment ofa social science training? How should a progressive institution deal with issues ofpeople coming from.

deprived backgrounds? Is it possible for JNU to conduct internal examinations in Hindi and regional languages? How to.

make the remedial classes and Linguistic Empowerment Cell more effective and engaging? How to ensure harmoniousmutual relationship between the teacher and the student where student can feel free to share their problems with the.

teachers without any hesitation? Can JNU as an institution take this responsibility and come up with an institutional.

mechanism where each and every student pursue their study with the dignity? "-i :·.

letus come up with ways to ensure that linguistic diversity becomes an asset, not a liability, for students ofJNU.We request the Students and Teachers to participate in this discussion today, frankly share their views and.

collectively move towardsaddressing the concerns. .

Sdl· Chintu, .

Convenor, JNUSU-SSS .

.

.

.

On 11th of January 2007 we have filed the second p"etition no. 29/2007 in the name of Prof. P.V. Indire:>an & Others(JNU, DU and NLSUI) Vs. Uuiun of India challenging the ~Jrd constitutional anlPndment. Senior Advocate Pali S.Nariman, Mukul Rahtogi and Indu Malhotra agued the case..

On 12th of January 2007 we have filed another petitior: no. 35/2007 in the name of Youth for Equality Vs. Union ofIndia challenging the OBC reservation. Senior Advocate Ashok Desai and Adv. M.L. Lahoty argued the case..

On February 20'h 2007 a petition has been filed in the name of All India Equality Forum Vs. Union of India. SeniorAd. Rajeev Dhawan argued the case. .

On 25th of April 2007 another petition has been filed in the name of Citizen for Equality Vs. Union of India. SeniorAd. P.P. Rao argued the case. The long and strenuous efforts of Youth For Equality paid off when all the Senior and learned advocates ofIndia agreed to fight the case of Youth For Equality at the Supreme Court of India free of cost.29th March 2007 -SC Stayed the OBC Reservation BillIn a "landmark Order, the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 29th of March 2007 stayed the OBC reservation actpassed by the Parliament. The Bench of Justices Arijit Pasayat and L S Panta delivered the verdict on the batch ofpetitions filed by Youth For Equality through various organizations and individuals challenging the decision asbeing ultra vires (unconstitutional). Keeping the petitions in mind, the Bench stated that Section 6 of theReservation Act was not applicable since no data on OBCs has been collected in the last 76 years. The Centre hastu determine who a e the socially and economically bqckward people of India, before the Central EducationalInstitutions Act can be given effect, the Bench stated. The .Bench said that the' OBC quota was just vote bank.

politics and said it v·as forced to take the decision against the Government as the Government did not implementthe SC's last two ord·~rs. .

23'd April 2007-Tl te Government of India tried at least thrice to vacate the stay fraudulently but failedBlocking Government plans to implement 27 per cent OBC reservation in higher educational institutionsfrom this year, the ~upreme Court on 23rd of April declined to vacate the stay on quota it ordered on March 29.The Bench of Justices Arijit Pasayat and L S Panta said that its earlier order staying the provision of OBC quotawas "final" as far as' the present academic session, starting 2007, was concerned. On Solicitor General G EVahanvati's demand for referring the issue to a Constitution Bench, the court said it would examine it at a later date."We had said keep the admissions process for OBCs on hold for this year. In that sense, it cannot be an interimorder. It operates finally for this year so long as there is no variation that may say circumstances have changed... Therefore, we said it's final," the Bench said, asking the Government why it was in such a hurry to implement theCentral Educational· Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2007. "If you could wait for 57 years, then youcan very well wait for another six months," the Bench said. "We do not want to play the game first and then framelhe rules. We want rules to be framed first and then play the game," the Bench said, rejecting the Governmentargument that staying reservation for a particular class for this year could jeopardize the future of students.17th May 2007 -SC Referred The Obc Quata Case To Larger BenchThe Supreme Courl on 17th of May 2006 Teferred the issue of 27% reservation for OBCs in centraleducational institutions to a larger Bench.August 2007 to November 2007-Hearing at the constitution benchThe constitution bench comprising of Chief Justice KG. Balakrishnan, Justice Arijit Pasayat, Justice C.K.Thakkar, Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice Dalveer Bhandari started hearing. The largest ever hearing involving.

as many as. two dozen senior advocates from both the sides (Youth For Equality and Union of India) undertaken for.

nearly four months. _ .

·JOth April2008 --Supreme Court Verdict on OBC quota is outIn the historic judgment, d1e Supreme Court pronounced its verdict. While upholding the reservation inaided institutions, the Court asked for Creamy layer removal. Besides .this, a person with a graduation has beendeclared as educationally forward. The Court also directed the Government to reserve·some percentage of 27% foreconomically backwad people. The Court also denied reservation in unaided institutffins. At the same time Courtasked to define the criteria for Creamy layer and for identification of OBCs. Merit has also been consideredimportant. The Government has been directed not to dilute the Merit to unreasonable extent.After the judgment what has happened is already conveyed to the student community over the past fewmonths. What next is the big question! We will end the culture of divisive politics and restore a union of India asgood as th~ citizen it serves, starting with real reform and agenda. The Youth for Equality is committed to the voiceof the students and citizen. We are committed to immediate change and excited to lead our university and countryin a new direction. .

All of your participation, support and suggestion is very vital for a society free from the intervention of caste, creed,religion and nasty politics. Do write in to us:yfe.contact@gmail.com or call us: 9891155057 .

Sd/-Manpreet Kuur, YFE Rcpresemalive Sd/-Raghih Akhtar, YFE Representative .

.

.

......

,. l ~I' :' ~ r..l.

!. j1! .' ~ i. ,·:+ . .

.

'· ' n. -'~:· 1: ' !i:~· o;o' ·1r 1.

.-j ril ,..

... L .

I 'l Jl 'l ,.

......r--I: .

~~ .

JNUSU An Appeal for Support and Solidarity in JNUSU's Ongoing Struggle.

rusticated and declared out-of-bounds three Office Bearers of the JNUSU as well as two other student .

''I-.

We are issuing this appeal on behalf of the student community at a time when the JNU Administration has.

activists who were part of a JNUSU-Ied protest..

You must be aware by now that this situation is the outcome of an agitation in which the entire student community has .

been participating for over a month. We have repeatedly stated that there is a need for open and democratic dialogue .

on the part of all sections of the university community, as well as coordination between students, karamcharis and .

teachers. The present impasse is an unfortunate situation that has arisen where protest actions by the student.

juncture, we would reiterate the need for genuine dialogue, which has been a marker of the democratic culture of .

.

community are met with unqualified repression on the part of the JNU Administration. But even at this.

We would also appeal .

to you for support and.

commercialisation and the anti-democratic moves of the JNU Administration. .

the university, and we believe that the teaching community has always played a vital role in initiating such dialogue..

solidarity in JNUSU's ongoing struggle against.

Who is responsiblf: for the breakdown of dialogue? .

with the Lyngdoh Committee Recommendations. Since the matter is still proceeding in court, as an interim measure, ,, .

It has been several months now since the Supreme Court stay order on the JNUSU elections for 'non-compliance'.

the students of JNU, in compliance with the provisions of the JNUSU Constitution, in a massive UGBM extended the .

tenure of the incumbent JNUSU. To all intents and purposes, therefore, this JNUSU continues to represent the .

legitimate aspirations of the student community and is duty-bound to struggle for them. The JNU Administration, .

however, has chosen to use the Supreme Court stay order as an opportunity to bypass the student union and.

sense of anger among the student community. .

.

the larger student community in all decision-making bodies and procedures. This has led to a tremendous.

What made it worse was the fact that the administration took several steps and policy decisions, of direct concern to .

the student community, without consulting the student body or student representatives in any way:.

.

·:· This was seen in the increase in the fee of the JNU Prospectus by 67°/o, a move, which JNUSU has been arguing, would deter students from deprived backgrounds from applying to JNU..

A circular issued by the PRO allowed the ecologically-sensitive area of Parthasarathy Rock to be madeavailable for the shooting of films and advertisements on a commercial basis. Worse, the entire area around PSR has been razed and trees have been cut, and the administration was not able to show any proof that it .

got this sanctioned f~e Environmental Task Force..

: .

.

This administration has also been reneging on its earlier commitments to JNUSU. even agreements inadministration agreed to set up a committee to examine the modalities of implementing OBC reservation, but writing! Thus, last year after JNUSU pointed out several anomalies in the admission process, thethis committee is said to have met only once and that too without any student participation. Similar is the case with their repeated deviations from their own commitment regarding the deadline of allotment of Koyena·:· Hostel, even when hundreds of students are still waiting after the lapse one and a half semester. .

-Even greater distress was caused by the fact that the administration unilaterally decided to install individual.

for the electricity that they consume. .

electric meters for each room in the upcoming Koena Hostel with the stated intention of making students pay.

On all these issues, JNUSU organized several protest actions which were marked by historic and unprecedented .

participation by the student community. Confronted by a demonstration of over 1500 students, all the officials in.

the protest was filled with "outsiders who had been brought in from DU and Jamia", JNUSU did not succumb to .

.

administration fled and refused to talk to JNUSU. Even when faced with such provocation, or the VC's statements that.

pressure and allow the movement to spiral out of control. However, the administration alternated between.

inconclusive dialogue. .

threatening the students, repeated vacillation and back-tracking on its commitments, as well as occasional,.

The '(ll)logic' of Punitive Action.

.

Eventually, the JNU administration conceded that it would withdraw the circular on the commercial use of the PSR .

area and also stated that it would not levy user charges from students. While these measures represent an advance of the student movement, many issues remain unresolved given the administration's insensitive and piecemeal approachlong days of negotiations, entirely failed to respond to the logical, rational arguments and issues raised by to solving problems. On the issue of rolling back the price of the Prospectus, the JNU Administration, in three.

JNUSU. After more than 15 days of protest, two meetings of the Standing Committee on Admissions were convened on 19-20 Feb., but far from seriously debating or reviewing the hike, these meetings were used only to "ratify" the .

increase [which till then had not been discussed in any of JNU's decision-making forum]. Instead, to maintain the .

pretence of being 'pro-poor', the VC all of a sudden introduced a clause that applicants from Below Poverty Line [BPL] families could avail the prospectus free of cost! This suggest1on was never discussed earlier with the JNUSU and was introduced as an eye-wash by the administration. JNUSU pointed out what is self-evident to any social scientist: that .

1 .

IJI. .

.

.

Manipal University | Admission Process | Fee Structure | Courses | Hostel Life | Contact Number

MORE THAN an ART SCHOOL....

Join #IIFD & Make a Career in A Creative Field.

For #Admission_Process Call @+919041766699 or visit @ iifd.in/

Find us on Map-

Chandigarh:- g.page/IIFD-Chandigarh

Mohali:- g.page/IIFDMohaliCampus

#IIFD_CHANDIGARH

Latvia is a beautiful country located in Northern Europe, with a rich history and culture. The country has a long-standing tradition of providing high-quality education, and its higher education system is well-developed and recognized internationally. Latvia is an ideal destination for international students who wish to pursue higher education in a safe, friendly, and multicultural environment. In this blog, we will discuss the higher education system in Latvia, its benefits, the admission process, and the cost of living for international students.

www.jeduka.com/articles-updates/latvia/-higher-education-...

Integrated B.Tech and MBA Computer Science – Check our Integrated B.Tech and MBA Computer Science course details, eligibility criteria, fees and admission process of Integrated B.Tech and MBA Computer Science at Invertis university.

.

18 March 2011 AC Meeting : An Appeal to JNU Faculty .

A meeting of JNUs Academic Council (AC) is scheduled for March 18th 2011. This AC meeting -which is scheduled to happen exactly an year after the previous AC meeting -is being held in the backdrop of JNUs administrations continuous scuttling of OBC reservations in JNU, despite a clinching verdict delivered by the Delhi High Court (HC) indicting JNUs admission policy regarding OBC reservations. .

The student community, as well as various faculty members, and even JNUs AC (which is one of the highest academic decision-making bodies in the university) has unequivocally rejected the Aditya Mukherjee Committees faulty and illegal cut-off criterion for OBC students, which is leading to large-scale non-fulfillment of OBC seats in JNU. Despite this widespread opposition, the administration continued with its faulty admission policy, and therefore this year alone, 277 OBC students were denied admission and their constitutionally protected rights of reservation by the JNU administration. And now, even after the Delhi HC (in its judgment of September 7th 2010) has held JNUs admission policy to be bad since it is rendering OBC reservations in JNU illusory, the JNU administration is stubbornly refusing to admit those eligible OBC students who have been criminally denied admission in JNU for no fault of theirs. .

It is also a matter of serious concern that ever since the OBC Reservation Act came into effect, the JNU administration has shown a shameful track record of false promises and undermining of a transparent, democratic decision-making process in JNU simply in order to subvert social justice and prevent the proper implementation of OBC Reservations in JNU. .

.

From 2008 onwards, the JNU administration has used the devious ploy of the faulty and illegal cut-off criteria to steal OBC seats and deny admission to OBC students. This happened despite the JNUSUs timely interventions from 2008 itself, repeatedly pointing out the fallacies of JNUs cut-off criteria for OBC students. .

.

.

Then, when the student community and the JNUSU protested, they instituted a committee under the chairpersonship of Prof. Aditya Mukherjee to look into the matter. Subsequently, even in the face of all logic and legal proof repeatedly provided by the progressive sections in the entire JNU community, the Aditya Mukherjee Committee was used by the administration to ratify its faulty and illegal admission process time and again. .

.

.

As a result of a long struggle by the democratic sections in the entire JNU community, the Academic Council (at its March 18th 2010 meeting) finally rejected the Aditya Mukherjee Committees recommendations. Subsequently, the Deans Committee upheld the ACs position in its 17th June 2010 meeting. It endorsed the demands of the student community and corrected the illegal and faulty cut-off criteria being followed by JNU. .

.

.

In July 2010, acting on spurious legal opinion served by the casteist Youth for Equality and prepared by lawyers well-known for their anti-reservation positions, the JNU administration shamefully overruled the AC decision and unilaterally issued an order in its own name reverting back to the Aditya Mukherjee Committees recommendations without taking the sanction of the AC. .

.

.

Again, in December 2010, the JNU administration decided to challenge the 7th September 2010 verdict of the Delhi HC through a Review Petition, once again acting unilaterally and without consulting or informing any of JNU's existing decision-making bodies. .

.

.

For the past three years, we have witnessed a shameful spectacle of institutionalized casteism in JNU. It is high time therefore that the JNU administration put an end to its casteist machinations. For precisely this reason, the upcoming AC meeting to be held on March 18th is absolutely crucial. At this meeting, several issues have to be settled conclusively: .

.

Cut-off Criterion for OBC Students: JNU has to correct the illegal cut-off criterion that it has been following for the past three years. After the 7th September Delhi HC verdict, it has no option but to implement the verdict in JNU and award relaxation for OBC students from the minimum qualifying marks and NOT from the marks obtained by the last general category candidate admitted. The anti-reservation, casteist YFE and its supporters have challenged the HC verdict in the Supreme Court. However, the SC has refused to stay the HC verdict, and therefore, the HC verdict will HAVE to be implemented. .

.

.

Quantum of Cut-off: Apart from the very definition of cut-off, it appears that the administration is retaining its bureaucratic and anti-reservation approach by arbitrarily setting a low quantum of relaxation viz. the qualifying/cut-off marks fixed for MPhil/ PhD are 40 for general and 35 OBC students and for BA/MA, it is 30 for general and 27 for OBC students. This is arbitrary and once again violative of the Supreme Court directives, which categorically states that a maximum relaxation of 10 % should be provided to fill all the OBC .

.

.

.

.

.

STUDENT-YOUTH CHARTER OF RIGHTS RIGHT TO EMPLOYMENT CHARTER .

1. .

Employment with dignity should be given the status of a fundamental right by the Central government Make an Employment Guarantee Scheme for urban areas. .

.

2. .

Unemployed youths above the age of 25 should be given respectable unemployment allowances by every State government. .

.

3. .

All workers under contractual or honorary basis should be immediately regularized as permanent workers. Make Commissions and Boards formed for giving employment regular and transparent. Fill vacant posts immediately. .

.

.

RIGHT TO EDUCATION CHARTER .

1. .

Scrap the current Right to Education law which denies the principle of right to basic education and encourages the privatization and commercialization of education. Bring a new Right to Education bill based on ·common school system·r .

.

2. .

Immediately repeal the Private Universities Bill, Foreign Universities Bill along wtth all the bills proposed in Parliament by the MHRD, which clear the way for privatization of education and corporate loot. Repeal the recommendations of the Lyngdoh Commission, which are against the principles of democracy and conduct Students' Union elections accqrding to democratic procedures on all campuses. .

.

3. .

Make laws at Centre and State levels to regulate and monitor the exorbitant fees structures, admission processes, evaluation processes and administration of all primary to higher educational private and semi-government institutions. Guarantee the implementation of reservation in educational institutions so that all deprived sections of society are represented, ensure democracy, transparency and removal of all discrimination! .

.

.

I .

DEMOCRATIC RIGHTSCHARTER AGAINSTCORRUPTION AND CORPORATE LOOT .

1. .

Scrap the government Lokpal draft Pass an effective Jan Lokpal Bill which brings the army, judiciary, NGOs, PM, MPs and ministers in its ambit. Make the structure of the Lokpal socially inclusive and democratic. Repeal the privatization and new economic policies basically responsible for corruption! .

.

2. .

Stop giving tax concessions to corporate houses. Scrap the policies which facilitate the privatization and corporate loot of land, minerals, water, coal, seeds, spectrum and other natural resources. Declare all natural resources to be national wealth! .

.

3. .

Repeal repressive laws such as AFSPA, UAPA and the Seditjon Act as well as measures like Operation Green Hunt which have been made to suppress democratic movements and protest. .

.

.

Today students, youth and the working class all over the world including in the US, Greece, Chile, London and France have come out on the streets to protest against the pro-corporate economic policies and to fight for the basic rights to education, employment and healt~. In our own country, too, It Is high time the ruling classes are confronted with the agenda of students and youth, through a powerful "Student-Youth Rights Campaign". We appeal to you to join the campaign. And on the historic Quit India day, August 9th 2012, we call upon .

you to join students and youth from across the country In a March to Parliament against the rulers of today! Let us break the barricades of corruption, and launch a sustained struggle to secure our right to education and employment as fundamental rights! .

All India Students' Association(AISA) .

Revolutionary Youth Association (RYA) .

.

Student-Youth Rights Campaign . .

.

For Education, Employment and Democracy! .

Against Corruption and Corporate-Loot ! .

.

. .

9THAUG2012 .

MARCH TO PARLIAMENT .

.

Contact: U-90, Shakarpur, Delhi-92, Ph:9868661628, 9213974505 (DU), 9540124091 (JMI), 9868030533(JNU), e-mail: aisahq@gmail.com;website: WNN.aisa.in; facebook group: student youth against corruption for right to education and employment .

-.

.

.

.

.