View allAll Photos Tagged test

My first using the almighty Polaroid 100 automatic land camera. It's a shame he moved!

QA InfoTech is an independent software testing partner helping clients to manage their testing processes with a variety of testing services, aimed for reducing the total cost of quality software development. The testing services are designed to provide customers with services that offer the most efficient methodologies and strategies. If you are looking for Software testing partners, we are there to help you. Reach us now at: www.qainfotech.com/service_offerings.html

Last Sunday I was bored and got this crazy idea. I mashed in some wheat malt, crystal malt and roasted barley. Then I mixed the wort with honey and water and boiled with Saaz hops (20 min + 1 min). I cooled it off and measured it SG1080. Then I pitched some drops of California lager yeast kept in the fridge from a previous brew. Dry hopped with some more Saaz a couple of days ago.

 

2 liters hopped mead fermenting, for a week now and still bubbling.

Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8

Canon 50mm f/1.8 mkII

Samyang 85mm f/1.4

Test Version vs Canoscan

Screenprinted test print featuring my Kool & The Gang / Chic poster design splattered on top. Printed by Peter Bekke and Ben LaFond for Burlesque of North America.

Didn't know my test shots for my new water proof camera will become a tribute to Village People's IN THE NAVY :XD: I had no idea that an US navy battle ship visiting my city without any notice! Of cos I don't mind that :XD: cos I love those hunky soldier hunks ;)

The funny thing is Bobby Han (brownie) and Bob Hector (blonde) are both set as knight/general of the Atlantis Empire, so, of cos they r both IN THE NAVY :XD: ❤

youtu.be/InBXu-iY7cw

Test Sony a55 con obiettivo in Kit 18-55

This was supposed to be a test shot.

 

Here is the story. So my buddy Kyle called me a few min ago and asked if he could borrow my Mamiya medium format camera. I told him he could and he came over right away. Since I had a few frames in a roll left to shoot I was super excited for an opportunity to shoot some more film. (It's just so much easier to grab the digital.) Anyway, we grabbed my strobes and headed back to the ally way since I think it produces some pretty kick ass back lighting as the sun goes down.

 

We meticulously set everything up. I balanced the strobe and the ambient with my light meter and finally decided to pop off a digital just to be safe. Then I started firing away. I took a couple shots, bracketed a few and then was done with the roll. As I reached down to put everything back in the bag I realized I had changed my shutter speed earlier to take a natural light photo before we started setting up the strobes. Unfortunately all the photos we took will not turn out due to the fact that we went WAY past the sync speed.

 

Either way, I still have the one photo I took as a test. Here it is.

 

Strobist info: SB800 with shoot through umbrella camera right.

This is the first test of my Radian, a timelapse motion device that I as a kickstarter backer of. Check it out at www.alpinelaboratories.com

The TEST train backed up until it was beside Belvedere LRT station and stopped before going back out onto the mainline. I'm just guessing that TEST stands for Track Evaluation System Train.

Testing shots took form my apartment.

taken by kiev60

arsat 80mm

film kodak ektacolor 160 exp 2006

zodiak 30mm f3.5

I don't particularly enjoy using topaz on any of my covers but I thought that maybe I should try it once in a while preferably without overdoing it :)

 

Wanted to keep this as simple as possible.

I made this since I honestly hate the lighting on the original cover so this was basically a test cover for both, a new colouring and topaz.

Just repeating some film shots on the Hasselblad with the digital back.

Piping Technology & Products, Inc., recently performed its snubber cycle test to prove the durability of a MSA 35 mechanical snubber manufactured for an engineering and construction company at Pine Bluff, Arkansas.

 

The cyclic test, performed using PT&P’s in-house, horizontal, hydraulic press, is designed to test snubbers at their two modes of operation. At high rates of loading, especially impact, the snubber is expected to provide very high resistance to movement. At low speeds snubbers are to provide very low resistance to movement. Testing a snubber at a low speed displays the normal wear and tear over an extended period of time.

 

In this case, a cyclic test was performed, in which the MSA 35 Mechanical Snubber with a load rating of 50,000 pounds and design travel of 6 inches was measured at a slow speed response. The low speed force remained at a fairly constant 500 pounds for the 50 hours and 5000 cycles it sustained. This value meets the common criteria that the drag force should be 2% or less than the rated load.

 

In addition to the snubber cycle drag test, Piping Technology & Products, Inc. has administered other tests such as the burst test for expansion joints. The tests executed by PT&P allow companies to attain the most precise and reliable data available to them. Using this to their advantage, customers will be able to compare data about the recently ordered products, to their individual standards of dependability and durability.

 

Piping Technology & Products, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries are recognized leaders in manufacturing pipe hangers/pipe supports (variables, constants, cryogenic supports cold shoes, hot shoes, mechanical/hydraulic snubbers, slide bearing plates), expansion joints/compensators (metallic, fabric, rubber, slip-type) and ASME Code Fabrication. PT&P has engineering drawing production stress analysis and full in-house finite element analysis that are used to prove designs. The design software is developed in-house and the calculations contrived are further checked using hand calculations.

Testing a Vivitar 28mm f2.8 on the Canon 1D markII.

Definitely a neat camera.

Will eventually get a canon lens 😂

A test shot with my amazing (to me anyway) antique Fujica Half batteryless wondercam.

Enhanced widescreen version of the original Test Card F

 

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_Card_W

 

This can now be found on your Freeview box if you're in the UK, instructions here

Like my photos? Buy me a coffee!

Follow me on Instagram

 

test model of a whirligig for a kid's magazine. More as it evolves and possibly gets approved.

Canon PowerShot S5 IS, test.

With the interior complete I took Me, Me and myself out for a test run. As usual I had to drive while I navigated and got a sleep in the back.

Left: Canon EOS 5D Mark II + EF100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

 

Right: Canon EOS 5D Mark II + EF100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM + Kenko 2X teleconverter (C-AF 2X TELEPLUS PRO 300)

 

Both focused at minimum and both cropped to 0.64 mm Field of View.

  

Test sewing, hmm will probably adjust pattern so that the waist is not so unnaturally taken in. Nyanko's happy she scored a new teeshirt haha!

John martins JM catalogue test 1983

A bit of a summer project.

 

Taking two redundant Hornby Mk IIa BFK vehicles and splicing them together a reasonable representation of a corridor first can be made. This can then be used as the basis for Test Car 6.

 

The first left hand side passenger window has been shortened, and the second blanked off with a scratch made panel to represent the generator compartment. On the roof a silencer assembly has been made and fitted.

 

Still to do are fettle the underframe and reverse the bogies (no idea why the prototype has its B4's the 'wrong’ way round). Filling and painting to come in a future post.

Test Card B was never transmitted

Using two GN Auto Nikkor 45mm 1:2.8 lenses in a comparison test mounted to a Nikon Z5 via an FTZ adapter which was then placed on a Benro TAD28C with an IB0 panoramic ballhead. I set up the tripod on top of a manhole cover so it would be easier to level it.

 

The 764085 lens has one improvement over the older 714595 lens in that it has a better formula of multi-coating on the elements.

 

The older lens suffers from a fungus infection, and I was only able to get the rear element pair out to clean most of it off. I have no idea where my Ponds cream has gotten to, as that is the best stuff to get fungus off a lens, so I had to settle for plain old 91% isopropyl alcohol and lens cleaning fluid.

 

I took a series of photos 90 degrees apart in order to get the different lighting conditions and angles. I put the camera in full manual and only made exposure and focusing adjustments. I may have missed on the focus because I haven't used the camera for quite a while and am not used to interpreting the focus assist readouts. I used the original HN-4 hood on the newer lens, and my cobbled-up replacement one on the older lens. I can see no difference in performance between the two hoods.

 

The lenses themselves, that's another matter. Besides any obvious differences in focus, I find the older lens not as contrasty as the newer one. But I wouldn't say the older lens is bad. It could still use a full cleaning, though.

1 2 ••• 44 45 47 49 50 ••• 79 80