View allAll Photos Tagged screen

Finally ditched the clutter windows setup and went for the minimalistic Apple iMac setup and have never looked back since!

eye shadow pallet from Zombie Suicide

It's quite large, as you can see - pint of Guinness included for sale.

Recently i have planed to take a new interesting project on cloud photography... with thousands of shapes and imaginations to build up from the nature's most artistic ingredient - clouds !...

Project-info Project mapping ADF screens

Little house geckos hanging around the screened in porch, waiting for the bugs that try to get through.

 

Trying out a mirrorless camera, Samsung NX2000, in my attempt to downsize while traveling. But found it hard to handle all the controls through the touch screen, lack of a viewfinder, shorter battery life, lack of advanced features that I have on my old DSLR and other adjustments - so I concluded that I need to keep looking for a different model.

My very messy desk top...

Which I would like to load or why this picture was even taken!

Mixed media - screen print and hand-painted colour.

Camera: Nikon Nikonos-V

Lens: W-Nikkor 35mm f/2.5 Prime

Film: Kodak Gold 200

Develop and Scan: Photo Hippo

front ~ screen printed with gorgeous feedsack fabric applied and hand embroidery.

please see profile

You'd better have a ticket if you want to watch the England Denmark match in Trafalgar Square. Where would our modern public spaces be without eight foot metal fences and security personnel?

Add a description...

Smoke Screen Dania can wear absolutely anything. I thought her extremely dark make up would make her very limited but she is one of the most versatile dolls I've ever had.

Miss 12 learning some tunes

Looks like a shadfly hanging on a screen.

When people think of New York, they think of The Statue of Liberty, tall skyscrapers, yellow taxis, shopping and Times Square among other things. However, the city is less known of its performing arts heritage and in fact is home to many fine establishments including the Lincoln Center. During festivals there are number of exhibits and props on display in the square being adored by passers-by. Take the spotlight and turn your picture into a focal point for the viewing public by displaying it on a huge digital screen in the Lincoln Center square. Simply choose a picture and pick from multiple coloured screens to instantly appear on the huge screen.

 

photofunia.com/effects/big-screen

Emily Soto Workshop London

Stylist Yanina Nikitina

MUA Emily Rebekah

Hair Andy Dowall

Model Abigail at La Moda models

Designer Chantal Mallet

Rusty Old Screen slowly deteriorating old door found in North Carolina.

The Great Screen, Winchester Cathedral. This was built in 1455-75, of fine-grained limestone, behind the high altar. The present statues are 19th century, which explains the presence of Queen Victoria among the Saxon monarchs. The original statuary was broken up at the time of the Reformation but much was recovered and is displayed in the Triforium Gallery.Great Screen was overseen by Dean Kitchin.Search for "Winchester Cathedral"

 

I like the light from screens in general. Computer screens, phone screens... They usually produce a very interesting (low) light.

What do you think?

 

Canon EOS 5DmkII with EF 50mm f/1.4 @ 1/80th sec; f/1.4; iso2500.

 

Website - Twitter - Getty - 500px - Book - ModelMayhem - Facebook - Blog

For the past week or so I've been spending some time playing around with the photosharing site 500px and am really starting to like it. The site has been around awhile (since 2003) but went through some major redesigns, most notably in the Fall of last year. The result seems to be a very elegant photosharing community that is far more focused on fine art and artistic oriented photography than Flickr is.

 

In a lot of ways, the site reminds me of an early Flickr, back when the staff seemed to care more and back when Flickr actually seemed to care about beautiful photography and their users.

 

The site has two different versions. There is a free version which features a basic photostream and limits you to 20 uploads per week and one collection. And then there is a paid version at $50 per year which offers unlimited uploads and collections.

 

Both versions offer unlimited hosting and a basic photostream organized by most recently uploaded photo in an elegant large square format with oversized photos when you click through. Both versions also include a free photoblog to blog your work in a different way if you'd prefer that over the traditional photostream as well as a wall where people can leave comments about you. 500px also claims that the photos are optimized for SEO so that your work can be found.

 

In addition to allowing unlimited uploads, the paid version allows a number of other features including the ability to link your photostream to a custom domain, an RSS feed, the ability to remove all 500px branding from your stream (aka white label), advertising free, as well as the ability to hook your stream up to a Google analytics account to better monitor traffic and activity.

 

In addition to your own photostream, like Flickr, you can build favorites of other photographs, comment on photographs and either "like" or "dislike" photographs which results in a public numerical score that a photograph receives. There are several areas where you can also explore some pretty amazing photography, including popular, editor's choice, upcoming and fresh.

 

Perhaps what I find most refreshing about the site as it's structured right now is that it seems to be attracting some of the most talented photographers I've seen on the web in any one place in long time.

 

Scrolling through many of the members photostreams it reminds me of some of the early photographers who gravitated to flickr using it to express the beauty of the world around them. Comparing some of the showcase areas above, for example, with Flickr's super crappy Explore (complete with blacklisting users, sparkly gifs, and obnoxious watermarks) there simply is no comparison as to which is showing superior fine art photography. 500px is better.

 

Also, in contrast to Flickr's puritanical censorship, 500px doesn't seem to have a problem with the occasional artistic representation of the female form that, God forbid, might (gasp) actually show a naked breast. I guess it probably helps that they are Canadian and more laid back about those sorts of things. Flickr on the other hand censored this photograph of mine of an 1874 painting by Jules-Joseph Lefebvre from the Chicago Art Institute that doesn't even show boobs.

 

Creating an account and profile was very easy on 500px. I liked that they don't seem to have a problem with html markup in your profile and I was able to link all of my other social media sites. It's also nice that your profile accompanies your photostream, favorites, etc. giving good exposure to the photographer.

 

Uploading photos was pretty easy. It's also nice that 500px allows images sized up to 30MB. Flickr is stuck in the dark ages with the pre-2004 20MB limit still. When popular cameras like the Canon 5DM2 routinely produce images between 20MB and 30MB it sucks that when you use Flickr's bulk uploader that they mangle images so badly, resizing them in some cases down to less than 500kb (example). It's bad enough to have your images resized without being told about it, but to resize a 22MB image down to less than 5% of it's original size just seems really cheap on Flickr's part.

 

It is a drag that 500px doesn't seem to read a photo's metadata and allow you to auto-populate titles, keywords, descriptions/captions, etc. Hopefully they enable that soon as there is no sense in doing that work in lightroom only to have to rekey that data in after uploading to 500px. There are also lots of areas that 500px seems to have room to grow in. It would be nice to see groups there like Flickr has.

 

Like Flickr, 500px allows you an embed code to blog your images, as well as the buttons necessary to share your image to other popular social networking sites like Twitter, StumbleUpon, Facebook, Google Buzz, etc.

 

I think more than any of the above items, what's got me most interested in 500px though, is what feels to me like a truly refreshing view of photography from the people who work there. Flickr staffers have routinely expressed their disdain over the years for the fine art photographer. They've deleted accounts without warning, they've censored artists, they've blacklisted many from Explore, they've banned artists from the public help forum areas, and in general just routinely treat us (their users) like garbage. We've been talked down to, treated like children, and been openly abused.

 

Compare and contrast Flickr's disdain for the artistic fine art photographer with this "about" page from 500px.

 

"The mission

Being an artist has never been easy, especially in today's fast paced, digital age. Photographers can't be just artists anymore, they have to be managers, accountants, marketing teams, assistants, web developers, and their own 'mean, lean, shutter-clicking machines". Too many things to handle? We sure think so! We started the company to help photographers get greater exposure, reduce some of the marketing headaches, and to let creatives concentrate on what they do best. We love seeing amazing work and equally love promoting it! A sense of inspired community is also important to us. We believe that the way forward is through presenting, discussing, supporting, and socializing with like-minded people."

 

Our Team

500px is a group of individuals that live and breathe photography. We like to share art with others and have the means to do so. Our small company is based in Toronto and from there we broadcast the awesomeness. We truly enjoy what we do.

 

That reads so refreshing.

 

500px still has a lot of work to do to continue competing with Flickr, but thus far I've found it to be very community centered and certainly with great potential. They state that they are currently seeking angel and VC funding here.

 

You can check out my photostream and follow me on 500px here.

 

Thanks by the way to my good rooftopping Pal Tomms, for turning me on to this awesome site. Check out this amazing photograph that he posted on 500px!

Powering up the first time. So far it's all gone smoothly. We'll see how the Vista install goes tomorrow.

The Ben Day process involved screens with raised dots or patterns that could be painted with ink or other media and then burnished onto prepared areas of an exposed zinc plate before etching, a photographic negative before exposing onto a prepared metal plate, or even onto artwork or ad material before it was photographed for the printing process. A complex and unique process, it appears in use from the late 1800s through the 1980s—maybe beyond in specialized industries or printing plants that didn't update.

  

On this page, a standard form of the device is shown with details about what tints and patterns are available. It appears to be from

  

The page shows at the bottom the printed results of applying 40 patterns to photographic negatives before etching and then printing. Compare No. 532 on this page with the identical No. 532 in the next image in this sequence. A 20% tint applied as a layer of pigment to a negative means that 20% of the exposed area is opaqued out, leaving 80% clear. When exposed onto a photosensitized plate, the clear areas harden. During etching, only the unexposed portions wash away. As a result, the relief plate used directly for printing (or through duplication in the stereotype mold/plate method) have 80% of the area covered in tint.

  

From Graphic Arts Production Yearbook, Volume 6 (1950)

1 2 ••• 6 7 9 11 12 ••• 79 80