View allAll Photos Tagged scanning

Camara: Asahi Pentax Spotmatic SP

Lente: Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 135mm f/3.5

Película: Fujichrome Velvia 50

Revelador: Kit Tetenal E6

Escaner: Minolta Scan Dual III

the scanning is very bad

it left so much dust on the image and lose lots of details

it looks much better in fact

I still have problems in cleaning the rouge and plate polishing

but I am so glad this one looks so great in fact

I will try other technique of digitalizing a dag. I really want to let others know how a dag looks nice

  

Scania Stream line 143 400 della ditta Natolino guidato da Carlo

Tirana summer '17

 

Canon P, CV 35/1.7 ltm, Kodak gold 200 el 100, self processed in Tetenal.

Scan out of an old journal. Self portrait black and white polaroid with the words "I don't want to be average."

It ended with flame

My Sister at work :)

 

Minolta XD 7, Rokkor PF 58 1.4, Fuji Sensia 100

I am doing some dumpster diving this summer; working on Photobooks of trips we took years ago. This was a holiday in Blanchard, Idaho and daytrips in the area in 1997.

I think this might be Spirit Lake- can't remember.

A fellow doll friend shared a couple pictures of their scanned doll on the London FB group and challenged everyone else to do the same and share the results. Here are my results XD My scanner has given me a really weird effect, wasn't really expecting it hahahahah~

 

I tried putting a black t-shirt behind to see if it would make things better but like he really looks tortured DX I'm so sorry Onai~

March 2018 - Sunday Cats and Everything Around

Scans from a trip in the Baltics + Russia in 1998

 

The graceful great crested grebe is a familiar sight on our lakes and reservoirs, and is well-known for its elaborate courtship dance, during which it rises vertically out of the water and shakes its head.

 

Species information

Category

Grebes and divers

 

Statistics

Length: 45-51cm

Wingspan: 88cm

Weight: up to 1.1kg

Average lifespan: 10-15 years

 

Conservation status

Common. Classified in the UK as Green under the Birds of Conservation Concern 5: the Red List for Birds (2021).

 

When to see

January to December

 

About

Grebes are diving waterbirds, feeding on small fish and aquatic invertebrates. A little bit larger than a coot, great crested grebes nest on floating platforms made up of waterweed. They can be found on lakes and reservoirs everywhere.

 

How to identify

The largest and most often seen grebe, the great crested grebe has an impressive plume on its head and orange ruff around its neck during the breeding season. It has white cheeks, a dark cap, a white neck and a dark body.

Distribution

Widespread.

Instagram // Twitter // Website

 

Got my final roll of film from Rarotonga Developed. These were taken when we went Fishing out at sea, my partner got very sea sick so there wasn't much fishing to be done.

 

Minolta Weathermatic 35DL

Kodak 400

Instagram // Twitter // Website

 

Canon 300x

Ilford pan F plus 50 film

Boulder Brook - September 2009

Two photos this time!! This photo was taken, I think, by my brother in 1969. I can see it was taken from the top of the Round Tower and quite a lot has changed! The rather iconic power station has gone and most of the buildings around the Camber have made way for housing now. I remember the chimneys well, particularly on a day trip to the Isle of Wight, as we could work out roughly where our house was, which was close by! Most of those buildings belong to Vospers Shipbuilders, and I used to feel nervous walking past the workmen on my way to school!!

 

One for Tootdood!

Well I reached the location in time to catch 1V93 (the 09:50 Edinburgh to Plymouth service) for a second time with 55007 Pinza. The inbound working is the 08:05 Liverpool, to Newcastle hauled by a Class 47.

 

Scan from a 35mm negative on Ilford XP1, Olympus OM1n camera.

The latest iteration of my scanning rig - 18mm MDF board and 3/8in threaded rod.

 

SOOOOOO much more stable and easy to use than an inverted tripod, with no vibration to speak of at all. And it's up on a bench with saves my back, and it lets my tripod get back to being a tripod.

 

I've changed my scanning technique too - I still take around 10 to 25 digital frames per 6x9 slide, with 50% overlap, but notice that the camera is now cross-wise to the transparency so that there aren't any frames of "just sky" for the stitching software to struggle with - it has a horrible time trying to find control points when there isn't much detail in the frame, and that seems to cause the only stitching failures I encounter.

 

Additionally, I have started shooting each frame as a bracketed stack to get more dynamic range and rescue a LOT of highlight and shadow detail - 4 to 6 images 2 stops apart, and then fusing each stack in Photomatix Pro, using the "soft" preset, which gives really natural results. Photomatix has a "Batch" menu, so I can set up a big merge job for several hundred images and then just go to bed!

 

I have also given up on stitching with Hugin - it's too manual and makes too many stitching errors. I'm now using Autopano Giga, which works great if you enforce a lens focal length on the image properties tab of > 1000mm (I use 9999mm) so it does a totally flat stitch, and render with a planar perspective. The resulting image is just a little sharper than the one from Hugin too. Autopano also has fantastic "fire and forget" workflow, which means I can go do something else while it renders the frames for several slides in one go (I put the merged HDR files for each slide in a separate sub-folder, so Autopano sees each one as a separate panorama).

 

Here is an example of the results - around 46 megapixels, cropped down from around 62 megapixels in this instance:

www.flickr.com/photos/119759627@N06/15174233631/sizes/o/

 

I'm still using my old-school Schnieder Componon enlarger lens on some cheap x-mount extender rings and a m42 mount adapter ring, however I am starting to suspect it is not resolving all the detail off the slide - I can read some of those signs with the 10x loupe, but they are blurry in the digitized image. I think I am going to have to try a modern computer-designed-aspherical-low-dispersion-multi-coated-autofocus macro lens for comparison.

 

Next task after that: laser-cut acrylic film holders, and an Arduino controlled stepper motor setup with a Ruby script driving a Sony a5100 with 30mm macro lens via Sony's RESTful wireless API, to make it almost fully automatic!

 

credit for original inspiration:

petapixel.com/2012/12/23/why-you-should-digitize-your-fil...

 

scan of my dad's slides

Dale ending a day on the Whistler glacier with a big method on the hip.

 

www.benngie.tumblr.com

Scan of my oldest daughter taken from a 26-year-old 35mm (Kodak Gold 200) negative. The negative was in bad condition, so I'm satisfied with the results - for documentary purposes.

I found an old, scratched negative and scanned it. My efforts to restore it follow. I do not know the date or place. Does anyone recognize the location of this photo?

Kodak Medalist F-2 5x7 exp. 3/79

Arista lith

olympus pen f

kodak hie

1 2 ••• 11 12 14 16 17 ••• 79 80