View allAll Photos Tagged revised
monday 30th march 2015
in part 10 we consolidated our comprehending of the thinghood of a thing and of its constituent phenomena. our task now is to look more carefully at the temporality of the thing 'through the eyes' of its constituent phenomenon {r(gv)}.
we must re-emphasise that these articulations of temporality are instantaneous, and that proper time would only appear to flow as a remembered accumulation for {r(gv)}, and only then if it were possessed of a brain.
likewise we should also note that there are no fractional states. these are temporal articulations of sheer absolute difference - which is in every case our own quantized or discrete comprehending, as the alterity of pure singleness.
(although the discrete nature of the electron shells of an atom are vastly more complex than this primitive thing, we hope to go there eventually.)
but let us here begin by simply adding up the total instances of the constituents at every moment of the thing’s existence. note that at any moment, the phenomenon 'is what it is at the present', and these are the accumulating quantities of interest.
(graphic)
tuesday 31st march 2015
(graphic)
we can see from the diagram that although {r(gv)} auto-comprehends as a simple alterity (i am spatially different from the other for a time), this 'binary' alterity is always comprised of a proportionality of three. we can also see that for each succeeding moment of time, their proportions are different. in other words, the complex (but symmetrical) proportional understandings of {r(gv)} are reduced at every moment to a simple, but gravitationally different (asymmetrical) alterity. (vis. a-symmetry).
moment 0
pure singleness extends as the elementary moment of a threefold thing {r(gv)}
moment 1
thingly phenomenon {r(gv)} instantaneously realises its binary alterity of proportions
red 0, green 1, violet 1...
(∴ phenomenal proportionality = 0 : 2)
moment 2
...which instantly presents its binary alterity of proportions
red 2, green 1, violet 1...
(∴ phenomenal proportionality = 1 : 1)
moment 3
...which instantly re-presents its binary alterity of proportions
red 2, green 3, violet 3...
(∴ phenomenal proportionality = 1 : 3)
moment 4
...which instantly re-presents its binary alterity of proportions
red 6, green 5, violet 5...
(∴ phenomenal proportionality = 3 : 5)
moment 5
...which instantly re-presents its binary alterity of proportions
red 10, green 11, violet 11...
(∴ phenomenal proportionality = 5 : 11)
we have raised a few terms here which we should try to consolidate.
things and phenomena
a 'thing' is constituted by 'phenomena' (later we will see that it is always three phenomena that constitute any thing - things are always comprised of threefold entanglements of their constituent phenomena.)
but things are always also the entangled phenomena of other more complex things. in other words, 'things' and 'phenomena' are our comprehending of regional entanglements of alter-universes.
‘phenomenal proportionality’ refers to the differential gravitation of momentary understanding among entangled phenomena. it is the measure of force of self-at-a-distance for any phenomenon of our comprehending.
whereas ‘thingly proportionality’ is the gravitational potential of a thing at any moment of its proper time; and is the product of dividing the quantity of phenomenal alterity by phenomenal self. it is the force of self-not-at-a-distance which the thing carries over into any subsequent phenomenality. thingly proportionality is gravity.
wednesday 1st april 2015
let us look further into the proportionality of the first few moments of thing {r(gv)}. (let us re-emphasise that these arguments are theoretical - concerning an impossibly isolated phenomenal thing {r(gv)}, and its thingly phenomena - rgv.) (we should also remember that what applies to red also applies equally and simultaneously to green and violet). (and also we will try wherever possible to make the pronouns personal, to reflect the fact that it is always our own comprehending under discussion).
moment 1 - the moment when the phenomenal thing {r(gv)} comes into existence, and thingly phenomenon r becomes real as the gravitational difference of its others (gv).
there being zero instances of red with one instance each of green and violet, let us assume that at the start of any thing’s existence, our phenomenal red self (whom we are trying to comprehend and which is in every case the one who is entangled with the others) is only real as the alterity of our phenomenal others, green and violet. therefore when we divide the instances of our alterity by the instances of our self, we see that at moment 1 the thing {r(gv)} is infinitely other. (2÷0 = ∞).
given that our self is nothing but its differential gravitation from alterity, this is to say that at the first moment of any thing’s existence, our gravitation to the other from which comes our differential existence, is infinite.
at the first real moment of any isolated thing, that thing has infinite gravity. (a thing only appears isolated to the thing which comprehends itself as isolated - therefore 'with infinite gravity at the beginning of time'.
moment 2 - at the second moment of any thing’s existence, there are two instances of our red self, with one each of our green and violet alterity. so we describe moment 2 as being of 1 : 1 phenomenal proportionality, and of gravity (1÷1 = 1).
(these numbers simply reflect the constitution of our alterity at the previous moment r(gv)- the constitution of our red self at any moment is always that of the constitution of our alterity green and violet at the previous moment of our co-existence).
(graphic)
the complete photo/video collection (1972-2016) of Stan Bonnar's artworks is accessible here :
Pit Stop Road Trip Fuel
8am
I've reversed out the main text and made it larger, the directional lines are now bold triangles, and the main shape from the background is now just an outline. I also made the subtext larger (though I believe it still needs to be a bit bigger) and got rid of the tilt it had.
Thanks for the tip Aleks.
The "binoculars" are really the missile and projectile interception system, known as "Throne". The system is very useful for intercepting missiles and even the Russian tank rounds. This system can only be mounted on armored vehicles due to the explosions and fragmentations caused from the exploding munitions.
Metra is the commuter rail division of the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) of the Chicago metropolitan area. Metra operates a total of over 100 F40PH locomotives on its commuter network.
Here is a LEGO rendering of an F40PH-2 in Metra livery using LEGO Digital Designer. Since I live in a suburb of Chicago, I am familiar with Metra commuter trains and thought one would make a good first train MOC.
The design process was challenging, but less so than I expected. The most difficult feature to construct was the nose of the engine. The solution was using a sideways "rocker bearing" to achieve the slight angle.
I have yet to build this using physical LEGO elements. When I do, a Metra logo, warning stripes, engine number and name, and American flag will be added. The warning stripes will conceal the gap in the front of the nose.
While I designed this completely by myself, several techniques were borrowed from Benn Coifman's Superliner.
Here is the prototype.
Overall, I am satisfied with my work; however, I will continue to revise as necessary. Suggestions are welcome.
Thanks to Alex @ CombatBrick I got a nice delivery of bits including some freebies inc. this nice sniper rifle, also wanted to show the updated fig with my velcro panel for the vest. This is now probably my fav. fig.