View allAll Photos Tagged process
This is a branch of blossom that I photographed 3 times: black & white, slide and cross-processed, this is the cross-processed picture.
Photo 2 of 3
-----
Taken with Rolleicord Va using Fujifilm Velvia 100 cross-processed in C-41
I used a different processing technique on this image. In the days of film, cross processing meant using different or wrong chemicals to develop the image. In Photoshop, it is really easy to re-create. Go to curves and create a simple and slight S curve. Then go to Red and Green color channels and create a simple S curve. On the blue channel create a simple but reversed S curve. Play with the curves on each channel until you like the results.
INL researchers are studying ways to economically process, densify and formulate raw biomass that will feed into a biofuels production facility. The lab's mobile, modular Process Demonstration Unit enables large scale testing for industry partners.
I was born and lived in this area 60 years ago have been walking around the Streets Of North Kensington W10 and Notting Hill Gate W11 to see the changes that have happened since I left 40 years ago.
Walking Through My Past
Near the end of the summer, I was asked by the publishers of Popular Science magazine to produce a visualization piece that explored the archive of their publication. PopSci has a history that spans almost 140 years, so I knew there would be plenty of material to draw from. Working with Mark Hansen, I ended up making a graphic that showed how different technical and cultural terms have come in and out of use in the magazine since it's inception.
Chaque année la Vierge Marie vénérée par des milliers de personnes dans les rues du quartier du Panier
Near the end of the summer, I was asked by the publishers of Popular Science magazine to produce a visualization piece that explored the archive of their publication. PopSci has a history that spans almost 140 years, so I knew there would be plenty of material to draw from. Working with Mark Hansen, I ended up making a graphic that showed how different technical and cultural terms have come in and out of use in the magazine since it's inception.
An old chip that i opened to see what's inside.
It's an Intel 8742, a 8-bit microcontroller that includes a CPU running at 12 MHz, 128 bytes of RAM, 2048 byte of EPROM, and I/O in the same chip.
See the official doc (pdf) on the intel's website.
Thank you to kingey1971 for the identification !
Process documentation for a small project I am building which harvests and visualizes colour data from six live sources.
Built with www.processing.org
When I posted this, I hadn't updated Photoshop to read DL5 RAW files--this is one of the non-processed JPEGs samples from the D-Lux 5.
Straight out of camera, 100% UN-processed JPEGs were quite good if not excellent.
I've posted several JPEGs shot in various daylights/night/indoor--Harvard pics were shot around noon; Christian Science Park around 10am; The "Field" bar shots between 330pm and 6:00pm. Prudential area between 4 and 6pm; picture of the red flash light around 8:00pm inside the house with lights turned off.
So here are my thoughts on DL5, based on having used the DL4:
1. I love the colors. They are saturated but not overly unrealistic. Colors feel very "Leica." DL4's colors were good never wowed me.
2. DL5 focus is lightning fast and accurate. I took some shots while walking down to Harvard--snapped pictures without stopping and most of my shots came out fine. The focus, I feel is faster than the DL4.
3. DL5 is sharp at 24mm all the way to 90mm! DL5 is sharper than DL4 and have better details and better colors (color preference is subjective, of course. I just like DL5's saturated colors. Besides, it's easier to tone down the saturation than to add more, since adding saturation, to me, seems a little unnatural in the results).
4. ISO! I have never used a small digital compact that look as good in 1600ISO as the DL5. Most of the shots from the VERY low-lit bar were shot with 1600ISO. Some were shot with Shutter priority to get some motion blur.
5. Macro mode is amazing--1cm focusing distance, just like the Ricoh GRD3.
Of course, DL5 still suffers from typical small sensor issue--lack of a broad dynamic range--leading to blown out highlights and detail-less shadows. But, such issues are easily fixed in LR or PS. With such great JPEGs results, I won't have to feel so eager waiting for RAW support in LR.
Oh, one thing I dislike about DL5 is there is no grip. When I sold my DL4, I gave away the grip. I think I'll have to get another one. Grip, to me, is essential when I shoot on the street. It gives me better stability and quicker framing (because I can move my hand much faster without the camera slipping off or have to worry about dropping the camera--yes I am using a wrist strap. Neck strap is too restricting and draws too much attention (as a tourist, even if you're not).
Just my 2-cents.
I haven't shot any cross processing or used my lomo since July 08. I was getting very fed up with it all. But i actually loaded a film into my lomo the other week, i haven't used it yet, but never say never.