View allAll Photos Tagged overprocessed
Posting this a little early since I have a really early morning flight on Sunday. Maybe this is overprocessed a tad...but isn't that what Sunday is for? Have a great day. HSS!
Overprocessed, but if you squint your eyes, you will see how it really looked, to me.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointillism
This is all I'm posting until I know my stream is working right.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For 2 days, my pix have not been appearing in my contacts list.
Comment from Jim-AR:
" Martha -- I had to go to my individual contact list to see your two Nov. 7 posts. They don't show on the normal list of pics by contacts. Something is apparently wrong..."
Apparently there are other people having this problem. It's being discussed in flickr forum.
I e-mailed flickr admin and I noticed this helpful (I think) reminder in their automated acknowledgment e-mail........
" We'd also like to take an opportunity to remind you that one query is sufficient and multiple queries regarding the same issue make the Magic Donkey cry. "
Soooo.......that means if anyone else is having this problem, they need to e-mail flickr admin and advise them. Make that wheel squeak!!!!
At the bottom of everyone's homepage is a group of Help topics. Use the "help by e-mail" link to contact administration and use the last choice in their menu... "other problems" ...when you write it..
The more e-mails, the faster the solution!!!
I took this last year. I messed with it too much and got it looking overprocessed and then lost the original in the recesses of my computer. I just found it this morning. I like this much better than the version I had posted before.
The image on the left looks over-processed and too unnatural to accept. Too much shadow has been removed and the image now appears flat.
The image on the right has more natural contrast, color, shadows and highlights.
Quick Tip:
Avoid overuse of Shadow/Highlight sliders in Photoshop and Lightroom — this can cause images to look flat and unnatural.
More about the Shadow/Highlight tool: adobe.ly/X9SIEJ
Not our digs at the time, merely somewhere we sneaked into for a quick pit stop before slinking out Uriah Heep-like. Couldn't resist a shot on the way through the lobby.
I love this picture, it's a little overprocessed but the dress looks exactly like a Victorian one...I love it =D
Oh yes, the title is from Open Your Eyes by Snowpatrol and the flowers in my hand are called goldenrod, and just as queene anne's lace is my summer obsession, goldenrod is my fall one =D
On the train, heading from Bangkok to Chiang Mai.
Don't flame me for the overprocessing ;>. The light from the sodium lights is an awful shade of puke-yellow, and the dynamic range was huge. The original photo was copied, and -1 and +1 exposure added to the copied images, and the three separate images combined in PhotomatrixPro.
SHSB9203-2
Over processed? Definitely. But I like it in a very unsubtle way.
A fantastic day working with:
MUA: Gemma Sutton
Styling: Emma Kimber
and LemonFire
Strobist: Speedlights left and right, clamped to hand rai one firing to the ceiling, one to the floor, both gelled blue. Speedlight through Lastolite Ezybox immediate camera left.
So let's pretend that this is a practice painting of some master....he got the dimensions a little wrong and his technique isn't great. Hope you have a great Sunday. HSS!
I've never had any luck with shooting the moon, but I snapped this one this morning (handheld), and was surprised how it came out. I may have to try it with the tripod again...^+^
It's a little overprocessed, but what the hey...
Intersection of the Reguliersgracht and Keizersgracht canals, Amsterdam.
This is an HDR shot - 3 exposures (-1, 0, +1) using Dynamic Photo HDR. Tried to avoid overprocessing.
Looks best large :-) View On Black
SLIDER SATURDAY 12/52
There are times that I find extensive post processing evokes a very different feel or mood from an image and sometimes I like the result.
Being more of a purist with photography, I seldom post these overprocessed images but I decided for 2012, I would post those images on what I have termed "Slider Saturday". These will be images that I have extensively moved the sliders in post processing.
The previous upload of this photograph seemed overprocessed, so I went back and made a more subdued version, and converted it to a modified black and white. View it large; it is worth it to see more detail in the distance.
I prefer this version to the previous attempt
I had to go down to the recycling centre, or the Dump as we call it, today. This is the the centre in Wandsworth, one of many along the Thames, which perform such an important function to keep London running. The barges run up and down the river all day taking the rubbish away....I don't know where to .... probably Essex.......
I had to overprocess this......how do you make a recycling centre look good?........
shirt: Trailer - vintage fit (bargain price @ $14.88)
jeans: P.R.L.Co - classic 867 (bargain price @ $31.25)
belt: Express (bargain price @ $6.85)
watch: iwc (free, bday gift)
shoes: Aldo (had it for 2 yrs, made vintage by Oshin's chewing marks)
glasses: prada (bought the frame online, got the lens at local medical school used my eyemed ins. for a total cost of $139.38)
picture overprocessed: priceless ;)
This was shot with no lighting or reflectors of any kind. The lens flare is real. I was just using this shoot to try some new retouching ideas.
Straight out of camera JPEG.
It's so great to have a focal range of (24 to 364); having such a focal range is so useful, especially for traveling and just everyday documentation/shooting, this little Sony HX9v has become my favorite, all around, take-everywhere-with me camera.
I have used other highly rated point and shoot cameras like the Sigma DP2s, Ricoh GRD III, Leica DLux (4,5) and Panansonic LX (3,4). I'm not a technical reviewer, but I do shoot a lot and I personally find the SONY having an edge over the other cameras—compared to the other compacts I mentioned, a. Sony covers an extensive focal range, b. I love Sony's Panoramic mode, c. I like Sony's "background blur" effect that actually works quite well.
And, above all, somehow, Sony has the fastest focus. I can shoot my kids on a swing (daytime) all day long without getting a single blurry pic. This was quite hard to achieve with the other point and shoot. Again, I need to mention that one issue I have with Sony is how SLOW it takes to change modes. Otherwise, it would have been one of the most responsive compacts I have used.
Image quality wise, it's impressive (for a small sensor size, compact). It's sharp when shooting up close; it's seemingly sharp when shooting landscape shots but if you zoom in at 100% you will see the workings of the image processor—some areas look good but some areas look downright ugly and overprocessed. That said, the overall image quality for web posting and small-medium prints will be fine.
…more thoughts to come later.
You know, I haven't overprocessed the crap out of anything lately.
...ah, that's better.
So last night I learned how to make a Mariotte Siphon to make a nice, consistent, adjustable drip, and then deprived myself of sleep shooting around 400 frames of dripping water under my high-speed strobe. And now today I flip through them and.. eh. I can't figure out how to make any of them look good enough to be worth posting. I did figure out a couple interesting processing techniques in Photoshop, though.
What, me? Pretend I can be arty? NOOooo...
The image on the left looks over-processed and too unnatural to accept. Too much shadow has been removed and the image now appears flat.
The image on the right has more natural contrast, color, shadows and highlights.
Quick Tip:
Avoid overuse of Shadow/Highlight sliders in Photoshop and Lightroom — this can cause images to look flat and unnatural.
More about the Shadow/Highlight tool: adobe.ly/X9SIEJ