View allAll Photos Tagged machine
Contacts: Lydia Lin
msn:sellmachine01@hotmail.com
skype:hcsales03
tel:86-595-82050111
Baby diaper machine,Baby Diaper Production Line,Baby Diaper Machinery,Full servo baby diaper machine,Automatic Baby Diaper Machine,Disposable Baby Diaper Machine,High speed baby diaper machine,Full Servo Automatic Baby Diaper Machine,Baby Diaper Machines,Baby Diapers Machine,baby diaper making machine,Diaper Making Machine,Full Automatic Baby Diaper Machine,High Quality Diaper Machinery,Diaper Machinery,diaper Equipment,Baby Nappies Machines,High Quality Baby Diaper Machine,Diaper Production Machines,Semi-automatic Baby Diaper Machine,Used Baby Diaper Machine,baby diaper production machine,baby nappies machines,baby diaper machine price,Semi-Servo Baby Diaper Machine,Economic baby diaper making machine,Economic type baby diaper machine,Disposable Baby Diaper making Machine,baby diaper manufacturing machine,baby diaper pad machine,diapers baby machine,baby diaper machine used,baby diaper production line machine,baby diaper machine production
+++ DISCLAIMER +++
Nothing you see here is real, even though the conversion or the presented background story might be based historical facts. BEWARE!
Some Background:
The Lockheed F-94 Starfire was a first-generation jet aircraft of the United States Air Force. It was developed from the twin-seat Lockheed T-33 Shooting Star in the late 1940s as an all-weather, day/night interceptor.
The aircraft reached operational service in May 1950 with Air Defense Command, replacing the propeller-driven North American F-82 Twin Mustang in the all-weather interceptor role. The F-94 was the first operational USAF fighter equipped with an afterburner and was the first jet-powered all-weather fighter to enter combat during the Korean War in January 1953.
The initial production model was the F-94A, which entered operational service in May 1950. Its armament consisted of four 0.50 in (12.7 mm) M3 Browning machine guns mounted in the fuselage with the muzzles exiting under the radome. Two 165 US Gallon (1,204 litre) drop tanks, as carried by the F-80 and T-33, were carried on the wingtips. Alternatively, these could be replaced by a pair of 1,000 lb (454 kg) bombs under the wings, giving the aircraft a secondary fighter bomber capability. 109 were produced.
The subsequent F-94B, which entered service in January 1951, was outwardly virtually identical to the F-94A. The Allison J33 turbojet had a number of modifications made, though, which made it a very reliable engine. The pilot was provided with a more roomy cockpit and the canopy was replaced by a canopy with a bow frame in the center between the two crew members, as well as a new Instrument Landing System (ILS). 356 of these were built.
The following F-94C was extensively modified and initially designated F-97, but it was ultimately decided to treat it as a new version of the F-94. USAF interest was lukewarm, since aircraft technology developed at a fast pace in the Fifties, so Lockheed funded development themselves, converting two F-94B airframes to YF-94C prototypes for evaluation.
To improve performance, a completely new, much thinner wing was fitted, along with a swept tail surface. The J33 engine was replaced with a more powerful Pratt & Whitney J48, a license-built version of the afterburning Rolls-Royce Tay, which produced a dry thrust of 6,350 pounds-force (28.2 kN) and approximately 8,750 pounds-force (38.9 kN) with afterburning.
The fire control system was upgraded to the Hughes E-5 with an AN/APG-40 radar in a modified nose with an enlarged radome. The guns were removed and replaced with an all-rocket armament, which was – at that time – regarded as more effective against high-flying, subsonic bomber formations. The internal armament consisted of four flip-up panels in a ring around the nose, each containing six rockets. External pods on the wings augmented the offensive ordnance to 48 projectiles. Operational service began with six squadrons by May 1954.
According to test pilot Tony LeVier, the F-94C was capable of supersonic flight, but Lockheed felt that the straight wing limited the airframe's potential, esp. with the uprated engine. Besides, the earlier F-94 variants already saw the end of their relatively brief operational life, already being replaced in the mid-1950s by the Northrop F-89 Scorpion and North American F-86D Sabre interceptor aircraft in front-line service and relegated to National Guard service. Therefore, Lockheed launched another update program for the F-94 in 1953, again as a private venture.
The resulting F-94E (the F-94D was a proposed fighter bomber variant which made it to prototype staus) was another, evolutionary modification of the basic concept, which, in the meantime, had almost nothing left in common with its F-80/T-33 ancestry.
It was based on the F-94C, most obvious change was the introduction of swept wings for supersonic capability in level flight. This change also necessitated other aerodynamic adjustments, including a new, deeper fin with increased area and a modified landing gear that would better cope with the increased AUW.
Under the hood, the F-94E was constructed around the new Hughes MG-3 fire control system, similar to the early F-102, but kept the AN/APG-40, even though it was coupled with an enlarged antenna. The respective new radome now covered the complete nose cross section. Furthermore, the F-94 E introduced innovations like a Texas Instruments infrared search/tracking system (IRST), which allowed passive tracking of heat emissions, mounted in a canoe fairing under the nose, passive radar warning receivers, transponders as well as backup artificial horizons.
With this improved equipment the interceptor was now able to deploy semi-active radar homing GAR-1s and/or infrared GAR-2s (later re-designated AIM-4A/B Falcon), operating at day and night as well as under harsh weather conditions.
All missiles were carried externally on underwing pylons. Beside the original main wet hardpoints outside the landing gear (typically a pair of 165 US Gallon (1,204 litre) drop tank, that were carried on the wing tips on the former versions), two additional pairs of lighter pylons were added under the wing roots and the outer wings.
Typically, a pair of SARH- and IR-guided AIM-4s were carried, one per pylon, plus a pair of drop tanks. Alternatively, the F-94E could carry up to 4.000 lb (1,816 kg) of ordnance, including up to six streamlined pods, each holding nineteen 2 ¾” in (70 mm) Mk 4/Mk 40 Folding-Fin Aerial Rockets. Any internal armament was deleted.
The F-94E's new wings allowed a top speed of 687mph at sea level and a top speed of 693 mph (1,115 km/h) at height – compared with the F-94C’s 640 mph (556 kn, 1,030 km/h) a rather mild improvement. But the enlarged wing area resulted in a considerably improved rate of climb as well as good maneuverability at height. The F-94E's performance was overall on par with the F-86D, with the benefit of a second crew member, while its weapon capability was comparable with the much bigger (but slower) F-89.
Both of these types were already introduced, so the Air Force's interest was, once more, less than enthusiastic. Eventually the F-94's proven resilience to harsh climate conditions, esp. in the Far North, earned Lockheed in 1955 a production contract for 72 F-94Es for interceptor squadrons based in Alaska, New Foundland, Greenland and Iceland.
These production machines arrived to the Northern theatre of operations in summer 1956 and featured an improved weapon capability: on the wet wing hardpoints, a pair of MB-1 Genie (formerly known as ‘Ding Dong’ missile, later re-coded AIR-2) nuclear unguided rockets could be carried.
For the missile pylons under the wing roots, twin launch rails were introduced so that the F-94E could theoretically carry a total of up to eight AIM-4 missiles, even though the wet pylons were typically occupied with the drop tanks and only two pairs of AIM-4A and B were carried under the wing roots. The J48 engine was slightly uprated, too: the F-94E’s P-9 variant delivered now 6,650 lbf (29.5 kN) dry thrust and 10,640 lbf (47.3 kN) at full afterburner.
Keflavik Airport, Iceland, although controlled by Military Air Transport Service (MATS), was the first base to be equipped with F-94Es as part of the 82d Fighter-Interceptor Squadron in early 1957, where the machines replaced F-94Bs and F-89Cs.
The type was popular among the crews, because it coupled a relatively high agility (compared with the F-89 Scorpion) with the psychological benefit of a two men crew, not to be underestimated during operations in the Far North as well as over open water.
The F-94's career didn't last long, though, the aircraft soon became outdated. The last F-94E was already retired from USAF front-line service in November 1962, only three years after the last F-94C Starfires were phased out of ANG service. Eventually, the fighters were replaced by the F-101, F-102 and the F-106.
General characteristics:
Crew: 2
Length: 44 ft 11 in (13.71 m)
Wingspan: 39 ft 10 in (12.16 m)
Height: 14 ft 6 in (4.43 m)
Wing area: 313.4 sq ft (29.11 m²)
Empty weight: 12,708 lb (5,764 kg)
Loaded weight: 18,300 lb (8,300 kg)
Max. takeoff weight: 24,184 lb (10,970 kg)
Powerplant:
1× Pratt & Whitney J48-P-9 turbojet, rated at 6,650 lbf (29.5 kN) dry thrust
and 10,640 lbf (47.3 kN) at full afterburner.
Performance:
Maximum speed: 693 mph (1,115 km/h) at height and in level flight
Range: 805 mi (700 nmi, 1,300 km) in combat configuration with four AAMs and two drop tanks
Ferry range: 1,275 mi (1,100 nmi, 2,050 km)
Service ceiling: 51,400 ft (15,670 m)
Rate of climb: 12,150 ft/min (61.7 m/s)
Wing loading: 78.6 lb/ft² (384 kg/m²)
Thrust/weight: 0.48
Armament:
Six underwing pylons for a mix of AIM-4 Falcon AAMs (IR- and SARH-guided),
pods with unguided 19× 2.75” (70 mm) Mk 4/Mk 40 Folding-Fin Aerial Rockets,
a pair of 165 gal. drop tanks or a pair of unguided nuclear MB-1 Genie air-to-air missiles
The kit and its assembly:
Another entry for the Cold War GB at whatifmodelers.com. This build was originally inspired by profiles of a P-80/F-86 hybrid, and respective kitbashings from other modelers. An elegant, though fictional, aircraft! Nevertheless, I wanted to build one, too, and take the original idea a step further. So I chose the F-94 as an ingredient for the kit mix – a rather overlooked aircraft, and getting hands on a donation kit took some time, since there are not many options.
I wanted to use the F-94C as starting point, which is already considerably different from the F-80/T-33. Adding swept wings (from a Hobby Boss F-86F, with larger “6-3” wings) changed this look even more. So much that I decided to modify the fin, which did not look appropriate anymore.
The fin and the spine’s rear end was replaced with the fin of a Kangnam/Revell Yak-38. In order to unify shapes and make the donation less obvious, the Yak-38 fin’s characteristic, pointed tip was clipped and replaced by a more conventional design, scratched from a piece of 1.5mm styrene sheet. In the wake of this modification, the round elevator tips were clipped, too.
Using the F-94’s landing gear wells as benchmarks, the F-86 wings (which had to be cut off of the Hobby Boss kit’s integral, lower fuselage part) were sanded into shape and simply glued into a proper position.
This worked so well that a completely new and plausible main landing gear installation was created. As a consequence, I used the F-86’s landing gear struts - they are much better detailed than the Emhar F-94C’s parts. The front wheel strut (it’s a single piece) was transplanted too, even though the suspension was switched 180°.
The Emhar F-94C’s cockpit is pretty good (esp. the seats) and were taken OOB. I just covered some gaps in the cockpit walls and under the windscreen with paper tissue, soaked with white glue.
The nose was replaced by a bigger radome, taken from an Armstrong Whitworth Meteor NF.14 (Matchbox kit). Its diameter and shape fit almost perfectly onto the F-94C’s front end, and the result reminds a lot of the EF-94C photo reconnaissance test aircraft! Under the nose, a shallow fairing for the IR sensor was added, and all four air brakes were mounted in open position.
The underwing pylons come from the scrap box (one pair from an Airfix A-1 Skyraider, another from an ESCI Kamow Ka-34 ‘Hokum’ which also provide the launch rails for the ordnance). The drop tanks come probably from an Italeri F-16 (not certain) while the four AIM-4s come from a Hasegawa USAF air-to-air weapons set.
Painting and markings:
This was supposed to become a classic USAF aircraft of the late Fifties, since the F-94 had never been exported. I was actually tempted to add Red Stars, though, because the overall shape has a certain Soviet look to it - esp. the nose, which reminds a lot of the contemporary Yak-25 interceptor?
But the original USAF idea won, with an all-metal finish. In order to brighten things up I chose a squadron that served with the Northeast or Alaskan Air Command, which added orange-red high-viz markings to wings and fuselage.
The NMF sections were primed with a base coat of Revell’s acrylic Aluminum. On top of that, single panels and details were painted with Alu Plate and Steel Metallizer from Modelmaster.
The International Orange markings were created with Humbrol 132, slightly shaded with orange (Humbrol 18).
Part of the nose section and the spine were painted in ADC Grey (FS 16473, Modelmaster), just for some diversity. Cockpit interior and landing gear wells received a coat of US Cockpit Green (Humbrol 226), while the interior of the air brakes was painted in Zinc Primer (Humbrol 81), according to pictures of operational F-94s.
The landing gear struts and the inside of their covers became Aluminum (Humbrol 56). The anti glare panel in front of the cockpit was done with dark olive drab (Humbrol 66), the radome flat black and weathered with wet-in-wet streaks of sand brown.
Operational F-94s show serious weathering on their di-electric noses, so this detail was taken over to the kit. Other weathering with paint, beyond a basic black ink wash and some shading on the orange areas, was not done.
The drop tanks were painted with Steel Metallizer, for a different metallic shade from the fuselage, and the AIM-4’s received a typical outfit in white and bright red with different seeker heads.
Primary decals come from a Heller F-94B kit, which have the benefit of a silver background – even though this does not match 100% with the paint. Squadron markings come from an Xtradecal F-102 sheet, tailored to the kit. Most stencils come from the Emhar OOB sheet, plus some more from the aforementioned F-102 sheet.
After some soot stains around the exhaust were added with graphite, the kit was sealed under a coat of semi-glossy acrylic varnish. The anti glare panel and the radome were kept matt, though.
A pretty result. Mixing parts from a Shooting Star and a Sabre (a Shooting Sabre, perhaps?) results in a very elegant aircraft. And while the F-94 lost much of its original, elegant appeal, the combo still works with this later interceptor variant of the F-80. Very plausible, IMHO.
Coming soon from Flame, the Chord Machine. The Chord Machine takes an input and forms a chord out of it via 4 outputs. In addition to the many pre-defined chords available to choose from, the module offers a transpose function, plenty of control voltage inputs and an arpeggiator. There is nothing like this currently available in Euro, and as usual it comes from the peculiar and forward-thinking German manufacturer Flame. Their approach to hardware has always been very musical and hands-on.
LINK: www.analoguehaven.com/flame/ .
Previously: Chapter XV - The ace
German below ⬇️
English:
The community has chosen A.
The smoke rises from the walls and the machines continue to run tirelessly. Speeders whiz past Finn as he searches for the "mysterious cargo" on the boardwalk.
His hope for a support from Rees and Alix grows in him, that they can support him quickly, because here at the docks all sense of time seems to be lost. Everything blurs into a uniform image, barely a ray of sunlight shimmers the darkness. 🌑 Finn ponders whether he should continue searching on the promenade or take another closer look in District No. 2. Maybe he missed something there?
To be continued…
Be a part of the story and decide what Finn should do A) continue searching within District No. 2 or should he B) continue searching on the Promenade?
All decisions influence the story and are taken into account for future decisions and events. For a) like the post until 2023-11-18 or b) leave a comment with your idea or “look up”. 👇
If you want see more of the Hunter Stories, visit their Album
Don't want to miss any Hunter Stories? Just follow me. More stuff and MOCs here and Instagram, or join Discord to see all episodes.
---
Deutsch:
Die Community hat sich für A entschieden.
Der Rauch steigt aus den Wänden und die Maschinen laufen unermüdlich weiter. Speeder sausen an Finn vorbei, während er auf der Promenade nach der "mysteriösen Fracht" sucht.
Seine Hoffnung auf schnelle Unterstützung von Rees und Alix wächst in ihm, dass sie ihn schnell unterstützen können, denn hier bei den Docks scheint jegliches Zeitgefühl verloren zu gehen. Alles verschwimmt in einem einheitlichen Bild, kaum ein Sonnenstrahl dringt durch die Dunkelheit. 🌑 Finn grübelt, ob er weiterhin auf der Promenade suchen oder doch lieber im Bezirk Nr. 2 noch einmal genauer hinsehen sollte. Vielleicht hat er dort etwas übersehen?
Fortsetzung folgt…
Gestaltet die Geschichte mit und entscheidet, ob Finn A) innerhalb des Bezirks Nr. 2 weitersuchen soll oder B) auf der Promenade weitersuchen soll?
Alle Entscheidungen beeinflussen die Geschichte und werden berücksichtigt für zukünftige Entscheidungen und Ereignisse.
Für A) like den Beitrag bis einschl. 18.11.23 oder für B) schreibe “nach oben schauen” oder mit deiner Idee hier in die Kommentare. 👇
Wenn Ihr mehr von den Hunter Stories sehen wollt, schaut bei Ihrem Album vorbei.
Ihr möchtet keine Hunter Stories verpassen? Folgt mir einfach. Mehr Stories und MOCs hier und auf Instagram, oder schaut bei Discord rein, um alle Episoden zu sehen.
I finished the painting finally! The problem: crying baby at night. The trouble: sleepless nights. The documentation: a painting for my son. In the process of doing such a painting, I managed to relax a bit.
The original scribble was "Incredible Crying Machine" on a CIAK sketch book in July 07, followed by even more sleepless nights with toss and turns in tiny little space thus the "Sleepless... Ego... Beauty" sketch. The acceptance part was in Oct 07 while I had some "talks" with my son about his crying through an afternoon chat "McQueen, Thomas, Elmo and My Son".
This idea of a crying machine persisted and I needed to do an acrylic painting about it. So one night near Xmas I pulled out a canvas and started from scratch and spent several days putting in symbols and my feelings in the final painting.
Well if you care to read the details, here's the symbols in the painting:
* Baby fat cheek: looks like a ball, which someday in the future will be gone. The cuteness diminishes as he ages.
* The wind-up spring handle behind his back: the invisible drive which keeps him crying unstoppable
* The winged legs: he runs very fast, most of the time toe walking/running. A condition I need to help him fix before its too late
* Music notes: when he runs, it really feels like he is running with music
* Clouds: unstoppable crying machine, a zleep buster, all the car brands he knows at the at of 2.9 years old. These clouds are sort of what he and my life collides
* Flying bucket: to catch his tears, literally the bucket is me flying over to comfort him for whatever reason he is crying for
* Sweat: he sweats at night and when he exercises, mostly started from the back of his head
* The porch: a door between his dream or half-wake half-sleep state and the real world. In the dream land the territory is the sky where he flies, while on the reality side everything is upside down
* The window: exemplifies how the dream land and reality is different
* 0 - 2.9 years old: I have a feeling that these unstoppable crying will stop after he is 3 years old. That he will be able to walk through the dream land - reality door with ease
* Blue eyes and pant: he likes blue a lot. I asked "do you like blue eyes?" one time, and he said "Yes!"
More on Scription blog: moleskine.vox.com/library/post/unstoppable-crying-machine...
a special something for someone special for Valentine
: recycled papers and machine stitching to create paper garlands for gifts & gift wrap
: see profile for shop detail
Banner newspaper.
Pokies are OK
Werribee Shire Council supports the introduction of poker machines into Victoria, in the hope that it will be beneficial to the finances of clubs.
Council made the decission in response to a questianaire from the Board of Inquiry into Poker Machines.
The questions asked were related to population, number of hotels, licenced clubs, etc, and if council had passed any resolutions in relation to poker machines.
Councilors were asked to submit personal views as well as a resolution of combined council.
Shire secretary, Mr John Kerr, told council that it could make comments on the terms of reference of inquiry, which were in relation to the likely social and economic affects on the introduction of poker machines.
Cr Ted Dowling felt the issue was most important in its effect on local clubs.
He said that everyone recognised the beneficial affect which poker machines had wrought on clubs in New South Wales, staging functions which were completely out of the reach of Victorian clubs.
As to the affects on individuals, Cr Dowling said he felt that each individual had control of own destiny in relation to the gambling aspect.
He said that clubs would have a greater scope for control than hotels because membership fee and the machines would not be freely available to the public.
Cr Dowling said he anticipated a cry about the affects of poker machines on homes, but he felt it was no greater than from any other form of gambling.
Cr Don Myers said he had nothing against women, but he felt they could get caught up in the continual quest for a jackpot.
He went on to say that he had heard there had been a fall-off in patronage in New South Wales.
"Anyway you can't win", he said "the Government will get 15-20% first," he pointed out.
"We have enough forms of gambling, already" Cr Myers claimed.
Crs Dowling and Menegazzo then moved that Council support the introduction of poker machines into Victoria.
Cr Julian Menegazzo said he lived in New South Wales for a number of years and people knew they could not win, however they put $5 or so in for a bit of fun.
He felt that Tattslotto was a bigger problem than poker machines.
Cr Menegazzo said he had seen people put hundreds of dollars into Tattslotto chasing the million-dollar prize.
Cr Glenn Clark said he opposed poker machines.
"Sure, there is good food and entertainment, and fun for those who have $5 to put into the machines, but I have seen the harm done to families by the machines," he said.
He felt the terms of reference had been framed in such a way as to justify the introduction of poker machines.
Cr Clark felt that the decision was one that councils should have to make. He did not feel qualified to speak on behalf of the 5000 people in South-West Riding, on that subject.
Cr Kevin Skehan said that he was certain that some people would be adversely affected by the introduction of poker machines, initially.
He pointed out that the same debate had raged about the introduction of 10 o'clock closing "when the doom and gloom meschants had forecast that we'd all be drunk every night".
"I support the proposal." he said, "it's essential to the development of the club industry and to tourism."
Cr Skehan said that busloads of Victorians went away for weekends to take in poker machines, which were not the prime reason, but merely the catalyst.
"What annoys me," Cr Skehan said, "is the sheer hypocrisy of it all. Poker machines are no different from people queing up at agencies for Tic Tac Toe or Instant Tatts".
"Many clubs and public places already had coin-in-the-slot machines which paid dividends in goods.
"It's ludicrous that in this countrywe have two sets of laws for areas separated by only 150 yards of water", Cr Skehan said.
Cr Hudson supported the poker machines, but only on a restricted basis - not in hotels. He added that clubs would be able to provide more community facilities thus lightening the load on local councils.
Cr John Gibbons said he felt there were more direct benefits from poker machines than from most other forms of gambling. "There is job creation in the machine manufacture, people have more social contact and clubs themselves employ more staff." he pointed out.
Cr Bruce Comben opposed poker machines saying that one only had to visit a club to see the affects on people. "And the club industry in New South Wales had more money than the government", he added.
Cr Ted Dowling said councillors could not sit up as moralists, but that individually they had a right to express their views. He felt they would be an advantage to Victoria. "football clubs have had to run two bob rafles for too long," he concluded.
Cr Pat Goodwin said she opposed poker machines because of the hardship she had seen caused to families.
The motion was carried 5-4 with Cr Southwick abstaining.
- Banner of 01 June 1983, p1.
3Q Machining - High Precision CNC Machining Services for Prototyping & Production of Custom Parts. 3Q Machining is top quality CNC Machining manufacturer factory in China for your custom precise plastic & metal machining parts from CAD drawings to final shipment, low MOQ with high-quality Products & Services & Innovations.
SAINT-FECO is an engineering enterprise which is professional in the manufacture and supply the PVC and Aluminum window machines 。www.windowmachine-chn.com
Sewing machine cover, made using 'Beyond Measure' pattern by Bloom. Main fabric is Mikko by Surface Art, along with fabric by Saffron Craig and Kona solids (tomato, snow) and grey homespun.
theelvengarden.blogspot.com/2011/10/funky-ing-up-my-sewin...
An abandoned fax machine lies in the stairwell before the cleaners take it away for their children to play with.
Why does HDFC Bank still insist that I fax them my address, not email?
Paragon Machine Works in Richmond, CA specializes in custom bicycle part manufacturing.
bradwenner.com/new/paragon-machine/
Strobist: bare head right, indirect window light from left
TIB Academy is one of the best Machine Learning Training in Bangalore with 100% placement support.
We are a standout amongst the best training institutes in Bangalore. We can positively offer you superb training with placement help.
Machine Learning with Python Training in Bangalore
Visit: www.traininginbangalore.com/machine-learning-using-python...
Photos from unveiling for 1,000 tonne tunnel boring machines at Royal Oak Portal - Westbourne Park, London - 13th March 2012 london-underground.blogspot.com/2012/03/photos-boris-john...
Please credit london-underground.blogspot.com if you use any of these photos