View allAll Photos Tagged interference
"Assetto Corsa"
-4500x6000 (SRWE Hotsampling)
-Content Manager + custom content
-In-game Photomode
-.ini Tweaks for post-processing filters
I even get to play on words with the title now... :) I'm always wary of going over the top with the contrast...particularly in light of how the judge reacted last night to lost shadow/hightlight detail...but what do you think? Is the loss of detail on the rocks worth the extra contrast of the scalloped edges? Or should I be doing more local changes to have it both ways?
The process of using a Hasselblad Flexbody is rife with opportunities for missteps, almost all of which I think I have discovered. The camera operates a bit like a mini large format camera. So you set it up on a tripod, the lens is open and projecting an image onto a removable ground glass focusing screen. You compose, focus, tilt or swing how you wish, then you thread in a cable release into a socket on the body. The trick then is you need to depress the release slightly less than halfway til it triggers the shutter to close. At this point you can put your Hasselblad film back on in place of the ground glass back. Actually you can put it on prior to this, but if you forget and pull the darkslide before closing the lens shutter.... well, I have done that at least three times now. Anyway, you close the shutter, mount the back, pull the darkslide, then depress the shutter the remainder of the way. Now you have two more opportunities to mess up at this point. The first is forgetting to replace the darkslide before turning the arming knob atop the camera that resets the lens back to open. Ooops, there goes an exposure. This encourages you to put the darkslide back in and remove the back right away before rearming the lens. But you also have to remember to wind the film back. There is a small crank on the side of the camera, much smaller than the usual Hasselblad crank, and it has a lock that needs depressing before you can wind. So put the darkslide in, wind the back, remove the back, rearm the lens, repeat.
I am learning the process but it does have its specific steps. This image, for example, was the result of me focusing on getting the back off the camera before I accidentally exposed the film when I rearmed the shutter. Of course, I forgot to wind the back and these two portraits double exposed over each other. At least I can say I have only done this once so far and this is it. But my muscle memory is setting in and the process is getting more natural.
Anyway, just wanted to share this one. Learning is about making mistakes, and making mistakes can often be the most effective teacher. It is the memory of the lost portrait here that sticks with me, especially since it was of someone I rarely see in person, when I am now exposing with this camera and hence, I have not forgotten to wind again yet.
Hasselblad Flexbody
Ilford XP2
By SUTD display for the iLight Bicentennial Edition at North Quay waterfront promenade, Singapore River.
In bonkics, interference is a phenomenon in which two coherent wines are combined by adding their intensities or bouquets with due consideration for their taste difference. The resultant wine may have greater intensity (constructive interference) or lower alcohol (destructive interference) if the two wines are in taste or out of taste, respectively. Interference effects can be observed with all types of wines, for example, white, red, rose, dry, or wet wine waves as well as in toilets as urinal waves.
Our Coast Guard escort out of Charleston Harbor had his hands full clearing smaller vessels out of the way. You would think the large white cruise ship would do that all by itself? A sign of the times I suppose.
With services diverted from the East Coast Mainline due to engineering works at Darlington the bases were loaded with trains terminating from the north.
Soap film interference. Third go at this with more glycerol in the mix. This stopped the colours swirling around and allowed me to take multiple shots for focus stacking using zerene thus getting the whole frame in focus.
... no te rayes cuando me mires, yo soy siempre el mismo, ... no cambio.
Las interferencias que ves cuando me miras son fruto de tu visión distorsionada de la realidad. Ahora piénsalo de nuevo, cierra los ojos y resetea tu mente, ábrelos de nuevo y verás que nada ha cambiado.
* He estado jugando un poco en casa con la iluminación y he creado 2 retratos conceptuales, este es el primero.
(cada vez que veo estos "azules" los asocio a los de mi amiga B. T.)
© Rafa Macías
Please, you can follow me on ...
500PX .
I just spent the last two day reloading windows because they have messed up my computer and interfered with what i was doing. This morning they shut me down twice to see what I was doing. ( took control of my computer from a remote location which I wish I knew where ) Both times I lost the display and the second time they shut me down completely. I had a hell of a time restarting until they left my computer. ( backed out ) What puzzles me is why ! The two bottom Icons on the screen grab ( the one with the question mark and the one below it are the bastards ) I changed the name on the icons because I know they are going to see it. Now it's government ass wipe ! I also had to change the name of my computer to the above mentioned.
The only reason I can come up with is the they are looking for illegal material. Kiddie porn, hate speech, or anything else that they don't like lately. Well I don't like kids, never wanted any ! I even don't like being around them . As far as hate speech...... you can refer to someone as a lady or man and get in the deep grease because gender assignment is not allowed. That 's how screwed up things have gotten here. So I would guess they are looking at my site to see what you guys are downloading to me. I know they just busted a big kiddie porn ring. ( their definition, because a photo of anyone under 18 is kiddie porn and they don't even have to be engaging in adult activity. Just being undressed or partially undressed will do the trick. Even an underage in a very skimpy bathing suit on a beach will get you in big trouble. That applies to boys as well as girls. if I open a page I get a pass on the first time if there is underage photo in what is considered inappropriate dress in this country if I back out right away. If I stay and look at the site and there are more photos of the same .......well we could both be in trouble by US law.
WORMOD Art 337 : An abstract interference in the middle of a composition of circles with neon effects.
The pattern is different on different screens in different resolutions and the moiré changes patterns based on the photo size
Testing one, two and now, three.
Radio frequency testing has begun on the first Orion spacecraft that will fly around the Moon for the Artemis 1 mission, just two weeks after thermal and environmental tests were completed at NASA’s Plum Brook Station in Ohio, USA.
Electromagnetic compatibility or EMC testing is routine for spacecraft. All electronics emit some form of electromagnetic waves that can cause interference with other devices. Think of the buzz that speakers give out right before an incoming call on a mobile phone.
Spacecraft electronics can cause similar interference, but out in space such interference can have disastrous consequences, so all systems must be checked before launch.
EMC tests often take place in a special shielded room constructed of metal walls and doors and foamy spikes (aka Absorbers) that block out unwanted external electromagnetic radiation, like ESA’s Maxwell chamber at its technical site in the Netherlands.
Though not an EMC chamber, Plum Brook’s thermal vacuum chamber is made of aluminium that does provide electromagnetic shielding, making it a suitable substitute.
To test electronics, the spacecraft will simulate a flight in realistic conditions with most of its subsystems and equipment powered and in operational mode.
The electronics are first tested for compatibility in this electromagnetic shielded chamber. Equipment will be switched on to test whether they do potentially disturb one another.
In the second round of tests, electromagnetic fields will be applied using antennas around the spacecraft to test the susceptibility to interference from external sources. The Orion capsule is equipped with electromagnetic field sensors to take measurements as the disturbance frequencies are injected into the chamber.
While all subsystems are a potential source of radio frequency noise, of particular interest are the transmitters that intentionally generate radio frequencies. These can easily disturb other equipment sensitive to electromagnetic noise, like GPS receivers, tele-command modules and other communication elements.
Orion’s European Service Module provides power, propulsion, and crew life support.
ESA experts are on site monitoring all tests alongside NASA colleagues as Orion moves closer to its first flight without a crewaround the Moon.
Find more in depth coverage of all things Orion on the blog.
Credits: ESA
from the series 'interference.patterns': dropr.com/jonathancastellino/120429/interference_patterns...