View allAll Photos Tagged implementation,
www.suite101.com/content/great-out-of-town-shopping-for-a...
Aaah, sieves and spatulas and whisks and things
Glacier National Park and vicinity, 2009; Between Billings, MT and Glacier Nat'l Park in Moccasin, Montana
Are you looking for Salesforce Implementation Company Florida ? We offer a wide array of Salesforce consulting and Implementation of Salesforce Agency services. Our team of certified Salesforce consultants help advance your capabilities and realize your Salesforce CRM Implementation's full potential.
Visit us:- growglobal.io/salesforce-implementation-services/
Alkhidmat Foundation Pakistan Sindh chapter has implemented another Clean Drinking Water Project (Community Hand Pump) at Village Hellaro Pir, Tharparker. Around 24 households are expected to benefit from the project.
Alkhidmat Foundation Sindh Chapter has implemented another Clean Drinking Water Project at Village Adhakho Tehsil Diplo of District Tharparker. Around 15 Households were benefited from this Water Project daily.
.
that their political masters are busy wooing corporates and FDI, destroying unions, implementing the liberalization policy d .
that has ushered In contractualisatlon. So what if workers who keep JNU running are denied the legal minimum wages an .
·~.
other basic legal entitlements? After all they do not vote! .
When the administration clamped down on students by suspending ten students the active betrayal of the JNUSU leadership came to the fore. The JNUSU office bearers refused to ~kecollective responsibility of a JNUSU led collective protest and submitted individual regret letters thereby capitulating before the administration's first attempt a~ .
ion that deliberately misconstrued and sttgmatlzedindividual witch hunt. The SFI dominated JNUSU council passed a resolutlution.) The suspended activists of DSU refused to submit.
the agitation. (The AISA faction had abstained on thi,s resoIndividual letters of regret, and took the Initiative to call for a UGBM and let the highest decision making body of the University decide. The first UGBM was shamefully scuttled by the JNUSU President who ran away with the· quorum sheets. In the reconvened UGBM, the same regressive JNUSU council resolution was floored. AISA, which had ear1ier abstained In the council, now joined SFI to support it, while DSU along with a large number of common students opposed it! In the UGBM the SFI floored resolutions to support Proctorial enquiry and force the DSU activists to submit individual regret letters. Both the resolutions were defeated overwhelmingly. The decisions of the UGBM are binding upon the JNUSU to act on. Neither factions of the JNUSU were r~dy to do that thergby undermining the.
' rights,.
legitimacy of UGBM. This pathetic apathy and inaction severely weakened the movem~nt for workers' and studentsand forced the DSU activists to give individual letters much against their wish. The inaction continued as the administration went ahead with the Proctorial enquiry. The JNUSU to its own comfort remained a mute spectator wit~outany .
concrete action to prevent that. When the Proctorial enquiry decided to rusticate 9 students and imposed fine on three office bearers, fresh agitation started. And one can say this with conviction that it was the participation of a huge number of stud~nt;S and their .
determined agitation along with the support of teachers and other prominent activists and Intellectuals that finally forced the administration to come to an agreement; despite the weak and dithering union leadership. The victory for the students and workers could have been far more dedsive had the Union leadershi.P not capitulated before the administration and diluted the terms of agreement. SFI who had till then been pushing the administration's demand for Individual appeal suddenly did an about tum, in a desperate attempt at competitive radicalism. Their logic: since they are 'Union Office Bearers', they are holy cows who are above the common students. Therefore, any attack on them is an attack on JNUSU! As If the common students are NOT JNUSU and any attack, individual victimization on them is justified! Be it Nestle, Manmohan Singh Protest or the workers' struggle, the track record ofSFI Is what one might expect of the perpetrators of the Nandigram massacre. .
Following the struggle some progress bas been made in ensuring the rights of workers. However, the gains are more sooradic than regular. The administration had formed a committee which Is yet to evolve a regular mechanism. Charter of Demands: Just clubbing genuine and just demands In the charter and presenting them to the authority Is not .
enough as the authority will never bother to concede to that unless there is a strong movement to back it up. For example .
the struggle to increase MCM went on with an indefinite hunger strike of more than 7 days. But the administration conceded only after a huge number of students gathered in the Ad-Block and threatened a militant agitation If the demands were not met. JNUSU leadership would like us to forget that the strength of the union lies in collective student mobilization. Similarly the demands for recognition of Alimiyat-faziliyat certificates in JNU admission process as well as the democratization of the .
Egual Opportunity Cell are very Important and genuine demands which keep coming back In the drafts of the Charter of .
Demands every year and are made to be mere election stunts. The Agreement that the administration had signed with the JNUSU on 12th July had yielded nothing again except some empty promises and constitution of some bureaucratic committees that nevercome up with any concrete measures. In case of the scholarships forM. Phil/Ph. D students, the administration completely ignored the demand of the cut off date set by JNUSU and arbitrarily had set a date of its own, .
disrespecting the agreement. The JNUSU resigned to calling a token protest and NOT launch a widespread movement among the students. The administration by disrespecting all the clauses of the agreement shows how littJe it cares for .
JNUSU or student opinion. The same apathy and disinterest Is visible on both the union leadership and administration towards combating the communal, castelst right-wing goons on campus. The administration dares to show such apathy because It knows that by and large the JNUSU leadership doesn't differ when it comes to larger policy decisions, the rhetoric of opposition is more a device to court votes and act as a safety valve for diverting student discontent. Imagine, when year .
after year, token demonstrations and negotiations yield no result, how can any really committed, really democratic union .
not take on matters on a larger scale, through UGBMs and mobilizations! .
Thin~ ~bou~ these experiences when you choose your representative. You are also choosing whether to let the .
admtntstratron corporatise the campus at will, or the campus will fight tooth and nail to defend its democratic space and .
expa~d It Your choice will impact on how this campus will fight for the rights of deprived students and oppressed castes .
~nd dtspossessed contract workers. Of course, the JNUSU election is not the be all and end all of the struggle for a more .
JUst, more equal, more sensitive c~mpus. But it Is Indeed an Important step. The Union Is an important tool for Intensifying .
the struggle for student demands. Our choice will either sharpen or blunt this weapon. But do remember, that no matter .
whom yo~ vote, any meaningful struggle to democratize the campus will need your political solidarity and active .
participation throughout the year. .
Central Panel: sss Councilors:RITUPAN .
BANOJYOTSNA.
(President) .
SUMATI.
.
SEROHI .
UMA.
(Gen Sec) VANESSA .
' ELURI SUNEETHA.
.
.. I ! I ~ .
(Jt Sec) .
.
This chair was a bare frame, and they repaired it by weaving the panels using plastic, and rubber strips. Like a tracter inner tube i think...
Implementando o Balanço Global "Financiamento para a Adaptação" no segundo dia da PRÉ-COP30.
Local: BrasÃlia/DF
foto: Rogério Cassimiro/MMA