View allAll Photos Tagged firewall
+++ DISCLAIMER +++
Nothing you see here is real, even though the conversion or the presented background story might be based on historical facts. BEWARE!
Some background:
Latil was a French automaker specializing in heavy duty vehicles, such as trucks, tractors and buses. Beyond the design and production of vehicles for civil use, Latil also built after World War I a number of military vehicles. For instance, in 1911, Latil designed and built its first four-wheel drive vehicle. This type of vehicle interested the French Army in 1913 for its ability to tow heavy artillery on every field and the TAR (Tracteur d'Artillerie Roulante) was built.
Beyond a number of field tractors, Latil also designed and built an armed combat vehicle for the French Army, the armored AMD-37 scout car. The origins of this design can be traced back until December 1931, when the French Cavalry conceived a plan for the future production of armored fighting vehicles. One of the classes foreseen was that of an Automitrailleuse de Découverte (AMD), a specialized long range reconnaissance vehicle. The specifications were formulated on 22 December 1931, changed again on 18 November 1932 and finally approved on 9 December 1932. They called for a weight of 4 metric tons (4.0 t), a range of 400 kilometers (250 mi), a road speed of 70 km/h, a cruising speed of 40 km/h, a turning circle of 12 meters (39 ft), 5–8 mm armor, a 20 mm gun and a 7.5 mm machine gun.
In 1933, several competing companies responded (including Latil, Renault, Panhard and Berliet) with their proposals. Being rooted in rather heavy machinery, Latil proposed two designs: one was a 4x4 vehicle which would meet the required specification profile, but it was eventually rejected due to poor off-road performance in favor of the Panhard design, which would become the highly successful Panhard 178.
The other proposal fell outside of the specification limits. It was a bigger and much heavier 8x8 design, certainly influenced by the German SdKfz. 232 heavy scout car family. However, despite falling outside of the requirements, the Commission de Vincennes was impressed enough to order a prototype of this vehicle.
The Latil prototype had basically a conservative layout and was ready in October 1933. It was presented to the Commission de Vincennes in January 1934 under the name Latil Automitrailleuse de Découverte, Modèle 1934 (AMD-34). The AMD-34 was, despite its 8x8 chassis and tank-like silhouette, based on modified Latil truck elements. Onto the ladder frame chassis, a hull made of screwed cast armor elements with a maximum thickness of 25 mm was mounted. The leaf spring suspension as well as the all-wheel drive were based on components of Latil’s heavy duty trucks. The eight large and steerable wheels were spaced apart as far as possible, with almost no overhang at the front and at the rear for a very good off-road performance and climbing capability. The crew consisted of three men: a driver and a radio operator, who both sat in the front of the hull, plus the commander, who, beyond directing the vehicle, also had to operate the weapons. The radio operator also had to support the commander as loader in the event of combat.
Power came from a water-cooled V8 petrol engine, an uprated version of Latil’s own V3 truck engine from 1933, with an output of 180 hp (132 kW). The engine was in the rear of the hull, separated from the fighting compartment at the front by a firewall bulkhead, and flanked side-by-side with two self-sealing fuel tanks with the large capacity of 80 and 320 liters capacity (the smaller tank fueled the engine and was constantly replenished from the bigger tank). A novel feature was an automatic fire extinguishing system, which used several tanks placed at critical spots of the vehicle, containing methyl bromide. The vehicle’s armament was mounted in a standardized, cast APX-R turret (which was also used on several light tanks like the Renault R-35) and consisted of a short-barreled Puteaux 37mm/L21 SA 18 gun as well as a coaxial 7.5 mm MAC31 Reibel machine gun. 42 armor-piercing and 58 high explosive rounds were typically carried, plus 2.500 rounds for the machine gun.
The hexagonal turret had a 30 mm thick, domed rotatable cupola with vertical vision slits. It had to be either hand cranked or moved about by the weight of the commander. The rear of the turret had a hatch that hinged down which could be used as a seat to improve observation. Driver and radio operator (who had an ER 54 radio set available) had no hatches on their own. They entered the vehicle through a relatively large door on the vehicle’s left side.
After testing between 9 January and 2 February 1934 and comparison with the lighter 4 ton types, the AMR-34 was, despite its weight of almost 10 tons, accepted by the commission on 15 February under the condition some small modifications were carried out. In the autumn, the improved prototype was tested by the Cavalry and in late 1934 the type was accepted under the name Latil Automitrailleuse de Découverte, Modèle 1935, better known under its handle “AMD-35”. Production started on a small scale in 1935 and by the end of the year the first AMD-35’s reached the Cavalry units. After complaints about reliability, such as cracking gun sights, and overheating, between 29 June and 2 December 1936 a new test program took place, resulting in many more detail modifications, including the fitting of a silencer, a ventilator on the turret and in the main cabin and a small, round hatch for the driver which allowed a better field of view when the crew did not have to work under armor cover.
The main weapon was also changed into a SA 38 37mm cannon with a longer (L33) barrel, since the original Puteaux cannon had only a very poor armor penetration of 12 mm at 500 meters. In this form, the vehicle was re-designated AMD-37. Several older vehicles were updated with this weapon, too, or they received a 25mm (0.98 in) SA35 L47.2 or L52 autocannon.
Overall, the AMD-37 proved to be an effective design. The eight-wheel armored car with all-wheel-drive and all-wheel-steering had a very good performance on- and off-road, even though with certain limits due to the vehicle’s weight and resulting ground pressure. The cabin was relatively spacious and comfortable, so that long range missions of 500 km (319 ml) and more could be endured well by the crews.
However, several inherent flaws persisted. One problem (which the AMD-37 shared with almost every French combat vehicle from the pre-WWII era) was that the commander was overburdened with tasks, especially under stressful combat conditions. The French Cavalry did not see this as a major flaw: A commander was supposed to acquire such a degree of dexterity that his workload did not negate the lack of need to coordinate the actions of two or even three men in a larger turret crew or the advantage of a quicker reaction because of a superior rotation speed. At first, a two-man-turret was required, but when it transpired that this would reduce the armor protection, it was abandoned in favor of thicker steel casts. However, the AMD-37’s armor level was generally relatively low, and hull’s seams offered attackers who knew where to aim several weak points that allowed even light hand weapons to penetrate the armor. Another tactical flaw associated with the turret was the hatchless cupola, forcing the commander to fight buttoned-up or leave the vehicle’s armor protection for a better field of view.
Operationally, though, the AMD-37 suffered from poor mechanical reliability: the suspension units were complicated and, since they were based on existing civil truck elements, too weak for heavy off-road operations under military conditions. The AMD-37’s weight of almost 10 tons (the comparable German SdKfz 231 was bigger but weighed only 8.3 tons) did not help, either. In consequence, the AMD-37 demanded enormous maintenance efforts, especially since the cast armor modules did not allow an easy access to the suspension and engine.
On 10 May 1940, on the eve of the German invasion in mainland France, the AMD-37 was part of 14 Divisions Légères Mécaniques (Mechanized Light Divisions; "light" meaning here "mobile", they were not light in the sense of being lightly equipped) battalions, each fielding dedicated reconnaissance groups with four to ten vehicles, which also comprised light Panhard 178 scout cars.
45 French AMD-37s were in Syria, a mandate territory, and 30 more were based in Morocco. The tanks in Syria would fight during the allied invasion of that mandate territory in 1941 and then partly be taken over by the Free French 1e CCC, those in North Africa during Operation Torch in November 1942.
The majority of AMD-37s in Western Europe fell into German hands, though: 78 were used as “Panzerkampfwagen 37R(f)” and mainly used in second line units for policy and security duties or for driver training. A small number of these German vehicles were sent to Finland, fighting on the Eastern Front, where they were outclassed by Soviet KV-1s and T-34s and quickly destroyed or abandoned.
Plans to augment the AMD-35’s armament with a bigger turret and a more powerful 47mm SA 35 gun (basically the same turret fitted to the SOMUA S-35 medium tank and the heavy Char B1bis) or an additional machine in the front bow for the radio operator were, due to the German invasion, never carried out.
Specifications:
Crew: Three (commander, radio operator/loader, driver)
Weight: 9,600 kg (21,145 lb)
Length: 5.29 m (17 ft 4 in)
Width: 2.52 m (8 ft 3 in)
Height: 2.44 metres (8 ft ½ in)
Suspension: Wheeled (Tires: 270–20, bulletproof), with leaf springs
Wading depth: 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in)
Trench crossing capability: 1.8 m (5 ft 11 in)
Ground clearance: 350 mm (13 3/4 in)
Climbing capability: 30°
Fuel capacity: 400 l
Armor:
9-30 mm (.35-1.18 in) cast steel
Performance:
Maximum speed: 75 km/h (47 mph) on road, 55 km/h (34 mph) off-road
Operational range: 600 km (375 mi) on road
Power/weight: 18,7 PS/t
Engine:
Water-cooled Latil V8 gasoline engine with 7.336 cm³ displacement and 180 hp (132 kW) output
Transmission:
Latil gearbox with 4 forward and 1 reverse gears, eight-wheel drive and steering
Armament:
1× Puteaux 37mm/L33 SA 18 gun with 100 rounds
1× coaxial 7.5 mm MAC31 Reibel machine gun with 2.500 rounds
The kit and its assembly:
This build was inspired by a drawing that I came across at DeviantArt a while ago, created by someone called MedJoe:
www.deviantart.com/medjoe/art/Autoblinde-SOMUA-S35bis-679...
The picture showed a Somua S-35 tank, set on eight wheels that heavily resembled those of the SdKfz. 234/2 “Puma”, in French colors and markings and designated S-35bis. I found the idea weird (since a full-fledged S-35 would certainly have at 20 tons been too heavy for a wheeled chassis), but the overall look of this combo was very convincing to me. I kept the idea in the back of my mind, until I came across a cheap Heller Somua S-35 in 1:72 scale and decided to take the concept to the (model) hardware stage and offer a personal interpretation.
Work started when I was able to acquire a sprue from a Plastic Soldier SdKfz. 231 kit, which provided a total of nine wheels in a suitable size and style, as well as suspension elements.
Building the hull was a straightforward affair: The Heller S-35 was built OOB, just the parts for the tracked suspension were left away. Some details and attachment points in the lower hull sections had to be removed, too. From the SdKfz. 232 I took the leaf spring suspension parts (these came as two frames for four wheels each, rather crude and solid parts) and cut the outer leaf spring packs off, so that their depth was reduced but the attachment points for the wheels were still there. These were simply glued into the space for the former tracks, similar to the drawing. This resulted in a slightly wide track, but narrowing the lower hull for a better look would have been a complicated affair, so I stuck with the simple solution. It does not look bad, though.
In order to make the vehicle’s role as a scout car more plausible and to avoid a head-heavy look, I decided to replace the original S-35 turret with a smaller APX turret from a Renault R-35. I found a suitable resin donor at ModelTrans, which was easily integrated to the S-35 hull. I perfectly fits into the S-35’s rounded cast armor style, which is so typical for many early French WWII tanks. Unfortunately, the resin R-35 turret had an air bubble at the rear, which had to be filled with putty. In order to differentiate the turret a little and modernize it, I added a longer gun barrel – in this case a piece from a hollow steel needle.
Other small mods include a pair of scratched rear-view mirrors for the driver, the spare wheel at the front (certainly not the best position, but the only place that was available and practical, and other armored vehicles of the time like the British Humber scout car also carried a spare wheel at the front) and an antenna at the rear, made from heated black sprue material.
Painting and markings:
This was not easy and it took a while to settle on a design. There were rather gaudy camouflage designs in the French army, but due to the model’s small scale I did not want a too complex design. I eventually decided to apply a rather simple scheme, inspired by the painting suggestions from the Heller kit: a disruptive two-tone scheme in a pale beige tone and a rather bluish dark green, which was confirmed through museum tanks. An odd quirk of the Heller kit is that the instructions and the box art show the same camouflage, but in inverted colors!?
I stuck to Heller’s suggestions and decided to follow the box art camouflage, which uses dark green (Humbrol 30) as basic color with light sand blotches (Humbrol 103) on top, which I found more appropriate for the middle European theatre of operations. I assume that these two tones were in real life separated by very narrow black or dark brown lines for more contrast – but I did not try this stunt on the small 1:72 scale model, it would IMHO have looked rather awkward. And there are French vehicles of the era that show these colors without any additional lines, too.
Markings/decals were mostly puzzled together from the scrap box, since the Heller decals turned out to be rather stiff and lack any adhesion to the model. I only used the “license plates”, which were fixed to the model with acrylic varnish, the rest are spares.
The kit received an overall washing with dark brown and a careful dry-brushing treatment with light grey.
After the final coat of matt varnish had been applied and all parts assembled, I dusted the lower areas with a dull grey-brown mix of artist pigments, simulating dust.
An experimental build, since drawing a whif is easier than actually building it, where parts have to fit somehow and you cannot change the size of them. Even though the resulting 8x8 scout car looks a little weird with its minimal overhang at the front and the rear, I like the result a lot – it looks very plausible to me. I also think that the smaller turret underlines the vehicle’s role as a rather lightly armed reconnaissance vehicle. It lowers the size and the silhouette, and subdues the S-35 origin – but without neglecting the typical French cast armor look. Certainly not a 1:1 copy of the inspiring drawing, but true to the original idea.
Basket case Series III Jaguar XKE in storage at Jaguar Heaven, an all Jag junkyard, Stockton California.
Night, 73 second exposure. Completely dark space, lime and red-gelled flashlight.
Reprocessed and replaced, September 2024.
I was sitting here working away on something when I looked down for a few seconds and looked back. At that moment I stared up at these two big screens in front of me full of yellow jibberish on black and thought
"wtf am I doing?"
See a complete review of my Network Closet here: youtu.be/1MzRNGlDcLs
Finally got the cables and cable management hardware to finish cleaning up my network rack. I will get the equipment to convert Video Surveillance to a Synology solution to replace the server based Geovision system that suffers from software issues.
Prosty program do blokowania wybranych aplikacji w Zaporze sieciowej. Zablokowane aplikacje nie mogą się łączyć z Internetem.
In the depths of a sealed tunnel, she stands between survival and extinction.
Tasked with protecting a key asset, she faces an alien entity burning through solid stone — its bioluminescent flesh resisting containment.
Finger steady on the trigger, mind colder than the blue fire ahead.
In this place, hesitation means death.
BCWF Wrestling - Battons-nous pour les sinistres - Future Shock Tom Fulton Vs Airone Firewall
Future Shock Tom Fulton Def. (Tap Out) Airone Firewall
( La bws est de retour. Et cette fois c'est pour une bonne cause! Les benefices gagnes pour ce show seront verse pour aider les sinistres du 14, 15 et 16 juillet. )
Das Graffiti auf der Brandmauer in Berlin Wilmersdorf passte genau in den Schatten des Nachbarhauses.
The graffiti on the firewall fitted exactly into the shadow of the neighbouring house.
BCWF Wrestling - Battons-nous pour les sinistres - Divers
Photos diverses prisent avant et apres le show.
Various photos taken before and after the show.
( La bws est de retour. Et cette fois c'est pour une bonne cause! Les benefices gagnes pour ce show seront verse pour aider les sinistres du 14, 15 et 16 juillet. )
At the Yateley May Fayre, Hayley "Fire Queen" Rilings bursts through a wall of fire on her fabulous blackened motorcycle....
Yep your eyes do not deceive you, this harks back to 1991 in TAFE NSW - Sydney Institute when there was only one computer in the library connected to the Internet and in typical DET fashion it was locked in a room?
Once we got the body on the frame, we were able to really chip away at getting stuff on the car. This picture shows some of the stuff we got mounted a couple of weeks ago.
Suddenly a few weeks ago, my craptastic Windows PC suddenly stopped allowing other machines to access its file shares.
At the time I had a quick look to make certain that "File and Print Sharing" was still ticked under Exceptions. Which it was.
Today I decided to have a closer look. So I turned on the firewall log. And sure enough even though UDP ports 139 and 145 and TCP ports 137 and 138 are clearly marked as open for machines on the same subnet, the firewall is still DROPping them.
All my machines are on the same subnet, but if I change the scope on UDP 139 and TCP 137 to allow access for any machine (i.e. machines from different subnets) to these ports and suddenly I can access them again.
Even though all my machines ARE on the same subnet.
What the hell? Am I missing something or is this an actual bug?
See my blog post on Sinosplice for an explanation of this screenshot.
To read all the text, view the larger version.
How to open a port in the firewall on CentOS or RHEL
If you would like to use this photo, be sure to place a proper attribution linking to xmodulo.com
How to open a port in the firewall on CentOS or RHEL
If you would like to use this photo, be sure to place a proper attribution linking to xmodulo.com
The fire wall soldered on. The middle part is also made from copper sheet (like the transmission hump) as it is more malleable than brass. It was also shaped over a wooden former.
National Geographic anyone? Mostly clutter and dirt but solid and dry!
Built around 1915 and soon to be destroyed 100 years later. The demise of this building began a few months ago when the building at the end of the block was burned to the ground from arson. There shortly after the city/county said the 2 adjacent building (one being the Prince/Roxy Theater that sat 400 and closed in the 50s) suffered severe water damage from the fire, and that they could use the space from the two buildings(and another building currently being used as a jewelery store) for parking space for the Princess Theater. So with camera in hand I decided to check things out for myself. The building itself is all brick exterior with rough cut 12x12 hardwood and brick posts for support in the basement. The basement has been packed full of junk by a local pack rat that has most of Harrimans old buildings packed to the rafters. The first floors is one big open space with the only water damage visable being from leaking water pipes. Even the exterior wall next to the building that burnt shows no signs of fire or water damage (I guess that 4 layers of brick with an airgap called a firewall did its job). The second floor is a bunch of apartments all dirty and abused from vandels. The worse place in the whole building was the back corner where the roof and floors have rotted pretty bad.. not from the fire next door but rather from years of neglect. Not something that couldn't be fixed. Ill try to post some outside shots before D Day.
Is it dirty and rundown? Yes
Should it be destroyed? I dont think so. I think the Princess Theater needs more local businesses to support it then it does a parking lot. Imagine Harrimans old buildings full of diners and shops. People would come to spend the afternoon before they went to the theater.
Am I somewhat biased? Probably I hate to see buildings full of history that served thier community for generations be brought down and replaced with blacktop.