View allAll Photos Tagged expression
Myanmar Feb 2014 - Pa'O Tribe.
I met this lady whilst in a market in Shan state. They believe they are descended from the dragon's egg!
See also my album: portraits when passing by and... you are welcome to visit my profile You should have a look on my Faves too.
I know, this skirt - top combination is not original, have uploaded already a few pictures wearing this with different heels. These heels you even saw already, but I like that my facial expression is different from the earlier upload, and at the same time I love how my long nails are nicely on display, so I decided to upload this one also. The last from the series...
Creative Time’s 6th Art on the Beach, summer 1984. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION NATIONAL MONUMENT by Laurie Hawkinson, John Malpede and Erika Rothenberg, on the landfill that would become the site of Battery Park City.
Expression of Lord Shiva by Child Artist from Pushkar, Rajasthan State, India....
For more photos please visit my website www.vinodkphotos.com
Also visit MY PHOTO BLOG and follow me on FACEBOOK
Ask me to draw any of my first danganronpa fanclass with any of these expressions! I didn't make this credit goes to agenderjirachi.tumblr.com!
Model: Believe The Hype Tate Tanaka &Most Beautiful Boy Auden.
Taking close-up photos is my favorite thing to do!
Size 3893 × 5470 DSC_8186
Original, HQ photograph, available. For more info:
robica.photography@gmail.com
selfportrait expressions humeurs "different faces"
Arrived in London a year before and joined Toastmasters club to learn better public speaking and meet people. By September I finished my first manual and was beginning to tell stories of my life before live paying audience with Spark London.
Also exercising my facial expression and body language as learned from the Competent Communication Manual.
This is only one of many very different one I have taken see (in the set) above
if you want to see more pictures, visit my website: www.adnansharbaji.com/reportage/
Thanks for your comments and favs!
Bharatanatyam, a pre-eminent Indian classical dance form presumably the oldest classical dance heritage of India is regarded as mother of many other Indian classical dance forms. Conventionally a solo dance performed only by women, it initiated in the Hindu temples of Tamil Nadu and eventually flourished in South india.
Trying to get the expressions of the public.
Streets of New York #21
by Guilherme Nicholas
New York City - NY
Two faces/expressions blended.
dedicated to my lovely, funny and talented French friend Alex
(he told me it was his favourite image of mine)
An Artist captures his inner angst. The ultimate selfie.
Image imagined in MidJourney AI and finished with Topaz Studio and Lightroom Classic.
The exoteric claim to the exclusive possession of a unique truth, or of Truth without epithet, is an error purely and simply; in reality, every expressed truth necessarily assumes a form, that of its expression, and it is metaphysically impossible that any form should possess a unique value to the exclusion of other forms; for a form, by definition, cannot be unique and exclusive, that is to say, it cannot be the only possible expression of what it expresses.
Form implies specifications or distinction, and the specific is only conceivable as a modality of a "species;' that is to say, of a category that includes a combination of analogous modalities. Again, that which is limited excludes by definition whatever is not comprised within its own limits and must compensate for this exclusion by reaffirmation or repetition of itself outside its own boundaries, which amounts to saying that the existence of other limited things is rigorously implied in the very definition of the limited. To claim that a limitation, for example, a form considered as such, is unique and incomparable of its kind, and that it excludes the existence of other analogous modalities, is to attribute to it the unicity of Existence itself; now, no one can contest the fact that a form is always a limitation or that a religion is of necessity always a form- not, that goes without saying, by virtue of its internal Truth, which is of a universal and supraformal order, but because of its mode of expression, which, as such, cannot but be formal and therefore specific and limited.
It can never be said too often that a form is always a modality of a category of formal, and therefore distinctive or multiple, manifestation, and is consequently but one modality among others that are equally possible, their supraformal cause alone being unique. We will also repeat - for this is metaphysically of great importance - that a form, by the very fact that it is limited, necessarily leaves something outside itself, namely, that which its limits exclude; and this something, if it belongs to the same order, is necessarily analogous to the form under consideration, since the distinction between forms must needs be compensated by an indistinction or relative identity that prevents them from being absolutely distinct from each other, for that would entail the absurd idea of a plurality of unicities or Existences, each form representing a sort of divinity without any relationship to other forms.
As we have just seen, the exoteric claim to the exclusive possession of the truth comes up against the axiomatic objection that there is no such thing in existence as a unique fact, for the simple reason that it is strictly impossible that such a fact should exist, unicity alone being unique and no fact being unicity; it is this that is ignored by the ideology of the "believers", which is fundamentally nothing but an intentional and interested confusion between the formal and the universal. The ideas that are affirmed in one religious form (as, for example, the idea of the Word or of the Divine Unity) cannot fail to be affirmed, in one way or another, in all other religious forms; similarly the means of grace or of spiritual realization at the disposal of one priestly order cannot but possess their equivalent elsewhere; and indeed, the more important and indispensable any particular means of grace may be, the more certain it is that it will be found in all orthodox forms in a mode appropriate to the environment in question.
The foregoing can be summed up in the following formula: pure and absolute Truth can only be found beyond all its possible expressions; these expressions, as such, cannot claim the attributes of this Truth; their relative remoteness from it is expressed by their differentiation and multiplicity, by which they are strictly limited ...
It was pointed out earlier that in its normal state humanity is composed of several distinct "worlds." Certain people will doubtless object that Christ, when speaking of the "world," never suggested any such delimitation, and furthermore that He made no reference to the existence of an esoterism. To this it may be an answer that neither did He explain to the Jews how they should interpret those of His words that scandalized them. Moreover, an esoterism is addressed precisely to those "that have ears to hear" and who for that reason have no need of the explanations and "proofs" that may be desired by those for whom esoterism is not intended. As for the teaching that Christ may have reserved for His disciples, or some of them, it did not have to be set forth explicitly in the Gospels, since it is contained therein in a synthetic and symbolic form, the only form admitted in sacred Scriptures ...
In the final analysis the relationship between exoterism and esoterism is equivalent to the relationship between "form" and "spirit" that is discoverable in all expressions and symbols; this relationship must clearly also exist within esoterism itself, and it may be said that only the spiritual authority places itself at the level of naked and integral Truth. The "spirit" (that is to say, the supraformal content of the form, which, for its part, corresponds to the "letter") always displays a tendency to breach its formal limitations, thereby putting itself in apparent contradiction with them. It is for this reason that one may consider every religious readaptation, and therefore every Revelation, as fulfilling the function of an esoterism in relation to the preceding religious form; Christianity, for example, is esoteric relatively to the Judaic form) and Islam relatively to the Judaic and Christian forms, though this is, of course, only valid when regarded from the special point of view that we are here considering and would be quite false if understood literally. Moreover, insofar as Islam is distinguished by its form from the other two monotheistic religions, that is to say, insofar as it is formally limited, these religions also possess an esoteric aspect as between Christianity and Judaism. However, the relationship to which we referred first is a more direct one than the second, since it was Islam that, in the name of the spirit, shattered the forms that preceded it, and Christianity that shattered the Judaic form, and not the other way around ...
Edie was transfixed when she gazed up and saw how big these horses were!!
Standing at 100ft tall and weighing more than 300 tonnes each, the magical Kelpies are a man-made wonder and a feat of engineering. The works of art, created by artist Andy Scott, have become iconic on the landscape after being modelled on real-life icons of times gone by — Clydesdale horses Duke and Baron. The Kelpies represent the lineage of the heavy horse of Scottish industry and economy, pulling the wagons, ploughs, barges and coalships that shaped the geographical layout of Falkirk.
www.visitscotland.com/info/see-do/the-helix-home-of-the-k...