View allAll Photos Tagged essentials
Originally opening in November 1993, as one of two new Kmart stores in Mobile, this store, along with three others in the market, was converted to the Sears Essentials brand in 2005.
The store occupies 51,348 square feet.
It's slate to become a re-branded Kmart store in November 2011.
16 Bulevardi, Helsinki, Finland.
Cathedral Chapter House: 1915
Architect: Valter Gabriel Jung (1879-1946)
In 1902 Valter Jung graduated as architect from the Polytechnic Institute . Then he worked as an assistant to Lars Sonck . In 1905 , Valter Jung founded a firm with Emil Fabritius. In 1915, Valter Jung has his own firm. In 1925, his brother Bertel Jung returns from Turku to Helsinki and they found their own firm.
Essential - tea. I have to have tea. None of the fancy ones though, it has to be 'builders' - ordinary black tea like PG Tips or Bells. With milk and sugar.
These three pots contained English Breakfast Tea. Photographed at the Blue Belle Cafe in Island Bay just before we set off geocaching.
For 117 pictures in 2017: 032 - Essential.
This is one of the magnificent crystal chandeliers hanging in
St. Pauls Shipwreck Church in Valletta. Probably the best kept secret in Malta. An extraordinary place of worship.
These chandeliers were being very carefully lowered in order for them to be cleaned and restored.
Essential Spyware
18/100... 100 x: The 2015 Edition... Week 8 - In Disguise
Negative Space Project
#90 "Clothing"..." 115 Pictures in 2015."
“By adapting and adjusting to randomness, you shape but do not control your endpoint.”
― Bob Deutsch, The 5 Essentials: Using Your Inborn Resources to Create a Fulfilling Life
Lacking inspiration tonight and saw this idea in practical photography, so here is my version. Yes I was an iPhone man until work provided me with a new phone... Which surprisingly I am quite enjoying. If I had to buy my own now then I would be in a dilemma.
Natural light and a few tweeks in PS for the vignette.
Cake made of diapers, and essentials - burp cloths, baby wipes, sheets, onesies, and more....
Between "architect" thinking on how to build this and the math to do the chevron painted wall! These are the projects students should be doing when learning.
www.aromahumidifier.com Discover the popular diffuser wholesale, essential oil diffuser wholesale, AMAZON seller supplier. Reliable aroma diffusers manufacturer in China. www.b2s.pm/jj5Rh0
Le Châtelard, Lavaux vineyards, canton of Vaud, Switzerland.
Shot with automatic Fuji Tiara II Fujinon EBC 28mm f/3.5 wide-angle lens on Kodak ProImage ISO-100 35mm film.
Pentax LX | Pentax Fa 43mm F1.9 limited | Fuji superia 400 400
Scanned with Pentax K1 FA Macro 50mm at F8 | Essential Film Holder
THE CLIMATE CHANGE SCAM.
The facts:
CO2 is a trace gas, it makes up only 0.04% of the atmosphere.
Expressed as a fraction, that is: four hundredths of one percent!
Only 3% of the total CO2 in the atmosphere is due to human activity
That is: three percent of four hundredths of one percent of CO2 in the atmosphere is likely to be caused by humans!
97% of the total CO2 in the atmosphere is from from natural sources
The UK only produced slightly over 1.% (1.02%) of the world's 3% total of CO2 caused by human activity!
That is: the UK produced around one hundredth
of the three percent total CO2 caused by humans!
The UK’s CO2 emissions have fallen by around 42% since 1990
CO2 is highly beneficial and crucial for life and plant growth.
An increase of CO2 would improve plant growth and reforestation.
The UK produces slightly over one hundredth of the human caused total of 3 percent (three hundredths) of the total four hundredths of one percent of CO2 in the atmosphere.
If you think that is a tiny, insignificant amount, you are perfectly correct.
All life is based on carbon, it is an essential food for plants. Plants obtain carbon from CO2 (Carbon Dioxide).
They separate the carbon from the oxygen which they release into the atmosphere.
The oxygen they release is also essential for life.
The idea that CO2 is a poison, or something undesirable, is preposterous nonsense. it is not based on good science, but politics, ideology and vested interests.
The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is very small compared to other gases, such as nitrogen, but it is essential.
The amount that humans contribute to the total CO2 is negligible. The vastly overwhelming amount - 97% is produced naturally. The idea that the other 3 percent, caused by humans, will destroy the planet is ridiculous.
Records going back centuries show that natural temperature rises are followed a rise in CO2, not the other way round. As the sea gets warmer it releases more CO2, a purely natural process. The most likely cause of the increase in temperature is activity on the Sun. The records show that it is an increase in temperature that causes an increase in CO2. This is not necessarily bad. A generally warmer climate caused by the Sun, with the resulting increase in CO2 is ideal for plant growth and a greener planet.
So, is CO2 a cause of global warming or climate change? Extremely unlikely!
You may ask; what about the scientific consensus, the claim that 97% of scientists agree that CO2 is a cause of climate change?
a) If something is repeated often enough, many people end up believing it. That’s how propaganda works.
b) Most scientists are not climate scientists, they work in other fields. They tend to respect the findings/opinions of other scientists, because they trust the scientific integrity of their peers, above any vested interests.
c) A consensus in science is not proof of anything. Scientific truth is not a democratic decision, it is not decided by a consensus, however large. That is a political concept, not a scientific one.
In science, empirical evidence is king.
The idea that a consensus opinion makes something beyond doubt, or unable to be challenged is an anathema to genuine scientific endeavour.
Science doesn’t work like that.
To impose a straightjacket on science is a fanatical position, which has the hallmark of ideological fanaticism. It is anti-science and a deplorable situation.
The common, political currency seems to be that anyone who dares to challenge the present, climate change opinion is a science denier, a term of abuse which is intended to imply they are wilfully ignorant, evil or even criminal.
That is an appalling situation. And very damaging for freedom of expression and the future of science. Scientific practice is a search for truth, not an ideology, or a political football. No genuine scientist, who has any integrity, can ever support such a situation. Any scientist who claims that manmade climate change is an irrefutable fact, or that issue is settled and the debate is over, is a disgrace to science.
There is no such thing as a ‘climate change denier’. It is a meaningless insult, invented by fanatical ideologues. All honest scientists would agree that any scientific opinion or hypothesis is only as good as the latest bit of evidence.
Inconvenient facts, the science that Al Gore doesn't want you to know:
binged.it/2WJoiRX
Piers Corbyn (brother of Jeremy Corbyn) - manmade climate change does not exist.
youtu.be/UvHMhZ1T964
Patrick Moore (one of the founders of Greenpeace) A dearth of carbon?
Dr. Moore says we were literally running out of carbon before we started to pump it back into the atmosphere, “CO2 has been declining to where it is getting close to the end of plant life, and in another 1.8 million years, life would begin to die on planet Earth for lack of CO2.”
According to Moore it is life itself that has been consuming carbon and storing it in carbonaceous rocks. He goes on to say, “billions of tons of carbonaceous rock represent carbon dioxide pulled out of the atmosphere, and because the Earth has cooled over the millennia, nature is no longer putting CO2 into the atmosphere to offset this.”
youtu.be/sXxktLAsBPo
Princeton physics professor William Happer explains why he describes some climate change scientists as a ‘cult.’
youtu.be/vro-yn59uso
Who trusts the MSM?
Their lies are not just fake news, they deliberately set out to slander those who don’t agree with the liberal left, globalist elite. Their lies are positively evil. Everyone should watch this video and they will never trust the media again: banned.video/watch?id=5f00ca7c672706002f4026a9
New NASA satellite data prove carbon dioxide is GREENING the Earth and restoring forests.
www.afinalwarning.com/500086.html?fbclid=IwAR2SoywjkPYu8-...
The latest Vegetation Index data from NASA shows that the Earth is getting progressively "greener" and lusher over time. The planet is 10 percent greener today than it was in 2000, NASA says, which means better conditions for growing crops. Forests are also expanding while deserts are becoming more fertile and usable for agriculture. All in all, the global Vegetation Index rose from 0.0936 to 0.1029 between 2000 and 2021, a 9.94 percent increase. "10 percent greening in 20 years! We are incredibly fortunate!" announced Zoe Phin, a researcher who compiled the data into a chart for her blog. "I just wish everyone felt that way. But you know not everyone does. To the extent that humans enhance global greening is precisely what social parasites want to tax and regulate. No good deed goes unpunished." A separate German study found that the globe has been greening for at least the past three decades. Satellite imagery suggests that vegetation has been expanding at a growing rate, contracting the gloom-and-doom narrative being spread by the climate alarmists.
2014 © Nazmul Hossain
All contents are copyrighted!!
Don't use this image anywhere without permission.Using any of my pictures without permission is illegal. If you want to use any of them, please contact by email at m2nazmul@gmail.com or,
Contact with me at +8801717552939
Connect me on Facebook
Follow me on Twitter
View my gallery at National Geography
Subscribe at Youtube