View allAll Photos Tagged containerization
Batuwangala Maha Vidyalaya's students participated for their annual excursion from 03.08.2009 to 07.08.2009.This event was organized by the Buddhist Association of the college and was proposed at the English literary Association.The whole plan was to cover the most impotent places of the Sri Lankan culture.The late Kingdoms of ancient Sri lanka was given priority.We left the school early morning at about 3am of 03.08.2009 and traveled through Mathugama,Horana,Aththanagalla and reached to Dambulla area by 2pm.We had the day one break fast near Horana.We first visited the ' Namal Uyana temple near Dambulla,Sri Lanka.This temple was a full of collections of pictures.
The pictures were about the misbehavior of the people in this birth and consequences of the deeds when they enter the next birth.It was put in to pictures in a way kind of calling to one to refrain from bad deeds.Students were awarded of the Eight fold path way revealed by Loard Bhudhdha and the statues of the temple was very helpful to depict.After taking the lunch of the day one @ the same temple we left for Dambulla Rock temple.
Dambulla Rock temple is more impotent to Art Students coz of its wall paintings.Dambulla temple is one of the masters peace of Buddhist Rock cravings and the watershed technologies used by the ancient people.All the students climbed up to the caves and worshiped there.there after We left for Anuradhapura where our day one accommodations were readied.The Night meal was cooked by the accompanied parents with the help of teachers and Senior Girls.Senior Boys were divided in to groups and assigned duties Accordingly.The parents woke up early morning with teachers and again prepared breakfast and lunch all together.We server break fast and containerized the Lunch.We left the technical College of Anuradhapura At about 7.30am And reached to the Isurumuniya Raja Maha Viharaya by 10 minutes traveling.
Isurumuniya is another impotent place for Sinhala Buddhist.there is a 6th Century Gupta style carving. The woman, seated on the man's lap, lifts a warning finger, probably as a manifestation of her coyness; but the man carries on regardless."
The figures may represent The Great King Dutugemunu's son Saliya and the law caste (Sadol Kula) maiden Asokamala whom he loved. It's known that he gave up the throne for her.
After the Isurumuniya we left for 'mirisaweliya' next to it.Mirisawetiya was built by the great King Dutugamunu who reigned during the time (161-137 BC) and united Sri Lanka under a single flag.
It is believed that King Dutugamunu had a sceptre that contained a scared relic of the Buddha. While going to the tank “Tissawewa”, for a water festival, the King has planted the scepter in a certain place. When he came back, it is said that his men could not remove the scepter from the place.
Witnessing the miracle, the King decided to build a dagaba enclosing the scepter. Thus was the creation of Mirisawetiya.
The significance of the scepter is the fact that this was the king's "victory scepter" for his battles with Elara, and by building the Dagaba around it shows the tremendous dedication that the King had for Buddhism and his spirituality.Mirisawetiya was the first dagaba built by the great king Dutugamunu.
After that we left for Ruwanweli Saya.The Ruwanwelisaya is a stupa in Sri Lanka, considered a marvel for its architectural qualities and sacred to many Buddhists all over the world. It was built by King Dutugemunu, who became lord of all Sri Lanka after a war in which the Chola King Elara, were defeated. It is also known as Mahathupa, Swarnamali Chaitya and Rathnamali Dagaba.
The stupa is also one of the Solosmasthana (the 16 places of veneration) and the Atamasthana (the 8 places of veneration in the ancient sacred city of Anuradhapura). The stupa is one of the world's tallest monuments, standing at 300 ft (92 m) and with a circumference of 950 ft (292 m).
Then we left for Jaya Shi Maha Bodhiya.The 'Bo' ( 'Bodhi') tree or Pipal (ficus religiosa) was planted as a cutting brought from India by by emperor Ashoka's daughter, the Princess Sangamitta, at some point after 236 BC. Guardians have kept uninterrupted watch over the tree ever since. There are other Bo trees around the Sir Maha Bodhi which stands on the highest terrace. In April a large number of pilgrims arrive to make offering during the Snana Pooja, and to bathe the tree with milk. Every 12th year the ceremony is particularly auspicious.
After the Sri Maha Bhodiya we vent to worship Thuparamaya.Thera Mahinda him self had introduce Theravada Buddhism and also chetiya worship to Sri Lanka. At his request King Devanampiyatissa built Thuparamaya in which was enshrined the collarbone of the Buddha and is considered as the first dagaba built in Sri Lanka, after the introduction of Buddhism. This is considered the earliest monument of chronicled Sri Lanka. The name Thuparamaya comes from "stupa" and "aramaya" which is a residential complex for monks.
This chetiya was built in the shape of a heap of paddy. This dagaba was destroyed from time to time. During the reign of King Agbo II it was completely destroyed and the King restored it. What we have today is the construction of the dagaba, done in 1862 AD. As it is today, after several renovations, in the course of the centuries, the monument has a diameter of 59 ft (18 m), at the base. The dome is 11 feet 4 inches (3.45 m) in height from the ground, 164½ ft (50.1 m) in diameter. The compound is paved with granite and there are 2 rows of stone pillars round the dagaba. During the early period vatadage was built round the dagaba.
After that we went to see Sandakadapahana.The Best of the Moon Stones we have in Sri Lanka is the one which is at the entrance to the palace of King Mahasen. According to Dr. Senarath Paranawithana, there is a deep philosophy underlying these carvings found in this Moon Stone.
We can clearly see the Hindu influence on the Moon Stones of Polonnaruwa . In the Moonstones of Anuradhapura , among the animals carved out was an ox. Hindus consider the oxen as sacred. Hence we do not see the ox in the Moon Stones of Polonnaruwa.
Then we moved to see the Samadhi Statue.Samadhi statue is a statue situated at Mahamevuna Park in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka. It is said that this is one of the best pieces of sculpture. The statue is 8 feet in height and made of granite and the Dhyana mudra is symbolished - The posture of meditation in which Buddha sits in the cross - legged position with upturned palms, placed one over the other on the lap.
Then we visited"kuttam Pokuna".One of the best specimen of bathing tanks or pools in ancient Sri Lanka is the pair of pools known as "Kuttam Pokuna" (Twin Ponds/Pools). The said pair of pools were built by the Sinhalese in the ancient kingdom of Anuradhapura. These are considered one of the significant achievements in the field of hydrological engineering and outstanding architectural and artistic creations of the ancient Sinhalese.
A garden was landscaped which separates the two ponds which in length is 18 1/2 ft. The larger pool of the two is 132ft by 51 ft, while the smaller pool is 91ft by 51 ft. The depths of the two pools is 14ft and 18ft for the smaller pool and the larger pool respectively.
The faces of the pools were cut granite slabs which includes the bottom and the sides of the pool. A wall was also built around the pool which encloses the compound. Flights of steps are seen on both ends of the pool decorated with punkalas, or pots of abundance and scroll design. Embankments were constructed to enable monks to bathe using pots or other utensils. Water to the pools were transferred through underground ducts and filtered before flowing to the pool and in a similar fashion the water was emptied.
Dr. Senerath Paranavithana was actively involved in the restoration of the ponds, in which small figures of fish, a conch, a crab and a dancing woman were found in the bottom.
With kuttampokuna we left the Ancient city Anuradhapura.Students wanted to have there Lunch on a Tank Dam.So we had our day two lunch on the dam of Nuwara wewa,Anuradhapura.But before lunch we did not forget to feel the breeze and the cold of the water.
By 2 pm day two we finished the Anuradhapura Visiting and left for Sigiriya.Student were curious and active.They took just 1hour to climb up to the Sigiya.Sigiriya (Lion's rock) is an ancient rock fortress and palace ruin situated in the central Matale District of Sri Lanka, surrounded by the remains of an extensive network of gardens, reservoirs, and other structures. A popular tourist destination, Sigiriya is also renowned for its ancient paintings (frescos), which are reminiscent of the Ajanta Caves of India. The Sigiriya was built during the reign of King Kassapa I (AD 477 – 495), and it is one of the seven World Heritage Sites of Sri Lanka.
Sigiriya may have been inhabited through prehistoric times. It was used as a rock-shelter mountain monastery from about the 5th century BC, with caves prepared and donated by devotees to the Buddhist Sangha. The garden and palace were built by King Kasyapa. Following King Kasyapa's death, it was again a monastery complex up to about the 14th century, after which it was abandoned. The ruins were discovered in 1907 by British explorer John Still. The Sigiri inscriptions were deciphered by the archaeologist Senarath Paranavithana in his renowned two-volume work, published by Oxford, Sigiri Graffiti. He also wrote the popular book "Story of Sigiriya".
The Mahavamsa, the ancient historical record of Sri Lanka, describes King Kasyapa as the son of King Dhatusena. Kasyapa murdered his father by walling him alive and then usurping the throne which rightfully belonged to his brother Mogallana, Dhatusena's son by the true queen. Mogallana fled to India to escape being assassinated by Kasyapa but vowed revenge. In India he raised an army with the intention of returning and retaking the throne of Sri Lanka which he considered was rightfully his. Knowing the inevitable return of Mogallana, Kasyapa is said to have built his palace on the summit of Sigiriya as a fortress and pleasure palace. Mogallana finally arrived and declared war. During the battle Kasyapa's armies abandoned him and he committed suicide by falling on his sword. Chronicles and lore say that the battle-elephant on which Kasyapa was mounted changed course to take a strategic advantage, but the army misinterpreted the movement as the King having opted to retreat, prompting the army to abandon the king altogether. Moggallana returned the capital to Anuradapura, converting Sigiriya into a monastery complex.
Alternative stories have the primary builder of Sigiriya as King Dhatusena, with Kasyapa finishing the work in honour of his father. Still other stories have Kasyapa as a playboy king, with Sigiriya a pleasure palace. Even Kasyapa's eventual fate is mutable. In some versions he is assassinated by poison administered by a concubine. In others he cuts his own throat when isolated in his final battle. Still further interpretations have the site as the work of a Buddhist community, with no military function at all.
We did not miss the beauty of sigiriya and to have some pictures of it.After the Sigiriya we Finished day two.Our day two Accommodation was ready @ Royal college Polonnaruwa.it was a nice experience coz all the students should experience a bath in a canal.most of them this was the first time to bath in a canal.
In early morning after taking the breakfast and the contained lunch we left to see polonnaruwa,the late kingdom of Sri Lanka.First fo all we went to see the statue of King Parakramabhahu facing the Parakrama Samudraya.it was another master peace of rock carvings.
then we traveled on the Dam of Parakrama Samudraya,the leargest tank of the polonnaruwa,and captured some occasions.We could visit the museum in frat of the Parakrama Samudraya.
After that we left for Dimbulagala.But we saw the Mahaweli river at Manampitiya and the newly built bridge.So we stopped there for the day three lunch.Students got the first chance to have a bath in the Mahaweli River.The water was cald and so clean even the dry season in the polonnaruwa area.it was so hot but still the water of Mahaweli river gave the full satisfaction of having a birth.with in 40 Minutes we finished the bathing and started to have our lunch.Students were very happy to have their lunch on a river bank.Dimbulagala is Another impotent Rock in polonnaruwa.After the lunch we left for Dimbulagala temple and visited the temple.After that we left for Mahiyanganaya.Our aim is to visit the ancient people in Sri lanka and to talk to them.We reached to the Dambana with the dawn an could talk to some Ancient people there.A gang of people there entertained us with some beautiful Veddas dance and songs.
After Dambana we went to our day three resting place.We stayed in a resthall at Mahiyanganaya.Like the two previous days cooking and containing food for the day was happened and we went to see mahiyangana Dagoba.Mahiyanganaya is one of a place where the lord Buddha has visited.We could capture the beauty of the dagoba to our lenses.
After that we went to see Soraborawewa.Another master piece of Tank technology by Ancient Sri lanken People.At sorabora wewa we went on a cane trip on the river and we found one capable oarsman with us on board.He too joined with other oarsman and took us around the Soraborawewa.
Then we left for Kandy.The road to Kandy to Mahiyanganaya was under construction but our two drivers took us to Kandy by 4.30pm.then we went to see Sri Dalandamaligawa.But on the way we impotent guests there.
According to Sri Lankan legends, when the Buddha died, his body was cremated in a sandalwood pyre at Kusinara in India and his left canine tooth was retrieved from the funeral pyre by Arahat Khema. Khema then gave it to King Brahmadatte for veneration. It became a royal possession in Brahmadatte's country and was kept in the city of Dantapuri (present day Puri in Orissa).
A belief grew that whoever possessed the Sacred Tooth Relic had a divine right to rule that land. Wars were fought to take possession of the relic. 800 years after the Buddha's death, in the 4th century CE, the tooth came into the possession of King Guhaseeva of Kalinga, which roughly corresponds to the present day state of Orissa.
Kalinga had become a Buddhist and begun to worship the Sacred Tooth relic. This caused discontent among some of the citizens, who went to King Paandu and said that King Guhaseeva had stopped believing in god and that he had started to worship a tooth.
King Paandu decided to destroy the relic, and ordered to it brought to the city. It is said that, as the tooth arrived at the city, a miracle occurred, and King Paandu converted to Buddhism.
When King Ksheeradara heard, he went with his army to attack Paandu in the city of Palalus. The invaders were defeated before reaching the city, and King Ksheeradara died.
A prince from the city of Udeni who had become a Buddhist came to worship the sacred tooth. King Guhaseeva was pleased with him, and let him marry his daughter. The prince was known as Dantha and the princess as Hemamala.
When they heard that King Ksheeradara had died in the war, his sons raised a large army to attack King Guhaseeva and destroy the relic. They entered the city, but King Guhaseeva secretly sent Dantha and Hemamala out of the city, with the relic.
According to legend, Hemamali hid the relic in her hair ornament and the royal couple disguised themselves as Brahmins in order to avoid discovery. They set sail from Tamralipti, a port at the mouth of the river Ganges, and landed in Sri Lanka at the port of Lankapattana (now Ilankeiturei).
It is said that Sri Lanka was chosen as the new home for the tooth relic because the Lord Buddha had declared that his religion would be safe in Sri Lanka for 2,500 years.[citation needed]
At the time of Dantha's and Hemamali's arrival on the island, King Kirti Sri Megavanna or Kithsirimevan ruled Sri Lanka. The King was overjoyed when he heard the news and warmly welcomed the royal couple and received the Sacred Tooth Relic with great veneration. He built a beautiful palace within the Royal Palace Complex itself and enshrined the Relic in it. Thereafter, he ordered that an annual perahera be held in honour of the Sacred Relic.
As time went on, as the land was threatened with foreign invasions, the seat of the kingdom was moved from Anuradhapura to Polonnaruwa, then to Dambadeniya and other cities. Upon each change of capital, a new palace was built to enshrine the Relic. Finally, it was brought to Kandy where it is at present, in the Sri Dalada Maligawa temple.
The Sacred Tooth Relic came to be regarded as a symbolic representation of the living Buddha and it is on this basis that there grew up a series of offerings, rituals, and ceremonies. These are conducted under the supervision of the two Mahanayake Theros of Malwatte, Asgiriya Chapters, and Diyawadana Nilame of the Maligawa. These have a hierarchy of officials and temple functionaries to perform the services and rituals.
Finally we visited the Peradeniya botonical guarden.Royal Botanical Garden, Peradeniya is located in close proximity to the city of Kandy in the Central Province of Sri Lanka. It is renowned for the collection the variety of Orchids,and has more than 300 varieties of Orchids, spices, medicinal plants and palms trees attach it is the National Herbarium. Total land mass of the botanical garden is 147 acres, 460 Meters above sea level with a 200 day annual rain fall, it is managed by the Division of National Botanic Gardens of the Department of Agriculture.
Finally we finished our Annual Excursion with lot of Joy and Knowledge,Experiences and lot more.We would like to thank the Two Rivers who took us all around this Island and parents,Teachers who helped to make this event a success.
In 2021, The Air Force Research Laboratory and ABL Space Systems partnered with operators from the 2nd Space Launch Squadron and 412th Test Wing at Edwards Air Force Base, California to demonstrate how launch systems can be operated rapidly by small teams from nontraditional sites. AFWERX, part of AFRL, brought together players from across the national security space enterprise for this rapid rocket launch concept of operations demonstration. The complete test campaign, from training to full operations with cryogenic rocket propellants, validated the strong training base and capability of U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Force active-duty personnel in conducting liquid rocket CONOPS and fielding of novel deployable systems.
Meatpacking District, Manhattan
669-685 Hudson Street (AKA 22-36 Ninth Avenue And 355-361 West 13th Street) Herring Building
Ownership History (formerly lots 1 and 2) Col. Silas Clark and Caroline S. Tarbell Herring John and Alida R. Pettit Henry Jotham and Mary A. Gates Newton Stephen Philbin Estate (foreclosure) 14" Street and Ninth Avenue Corp. (John J. Gillen, James S. Maher) Produce Center Realty Corp. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. (foreclosure) Monash Family (Samuel, Alexander, Louis, Rose, Paul, Lillian, Rebecca) David Ellis Commercial Tenants Herring Safe &Lock Co.1 Herring, Fanel& Sherman1 Herring & Co. (1849-83); Martha Washington Flour Co. (1889); William Adams, fruit (1889); Joseph Mallard, fruit (1889); Vetelli & Vaccheri, grocers (1889); James Hughes, produce (1889); Hugh Reilly, produce (1889); John Higgins, liquor (1891); Martin Early, saloon (1892); William Ehlers, saloon (1897-1905); Osborn Mfg. Co., cages (1901-02); Frederick M. Beakes Specialty Co., grocer (1902); John J. Tarlton, grocer (1902); Hefner Gilding Co. (1904); William F. Lubbert, beer (1905-09); Horace E. Demorest, butter (1906-42); Winfield Mapes, butter, eggs, cheese (1906-08); William F. Bourke, butcher (1912); Louis J. Sice, restaurant (19 12); Charles Moewes, restaurant (1913- 17); Frederick Knippenberg, caf6 (1916-42); Elite Specialty Metal Co. (1928-33); Kleinhardt Hardware Co.1 Kleinhardt, Inc.1 Willets Mfg. Co., push carts (1929-70); Elson Express Co. (1929); Hyvis Motor Oil Co. (1929); Chelsea Wire Works (1929-38); Georgette Hat Co. (1929); Modern Office Devices (1929-42); R-X Filing Co. (1929); Charles H. Breese, William F. Clifford, provisions (1929-33); Brook Valley1 Oakleigh Farms (1929-42); Nathan Zarkower, butter and eggs (1929-42); Market Restaurant (1933-70); L.I. Transport Co. (1933); Acme Machine & Motor Co. (1933); Ballard's Motor Transportatin Co. (1933); Brut's Motor Service/Express (1933-42); Elson Trucking Co. (1933-42); M.S. Abraham, provisions (1936-38); Premier Rubber Mfg. Co. (1942); Merchants Trucking Co. (1942); Edwin Elevator Co. (1942-65); Apex Provision Co. (1946); E.F. Kaiser Co., engineering (1946-93); Majestic Elevator Co. (1946); Tricomi Machine & Mfg. Co. (1946); Cherra China, decorators (1946); Triangle Bar & Grill (1946-65); Leib & Mendell355 Meat Co., wholesale meats (1950-70); Brown & Langer, pickle products (1950); Marvin Ellis Co.1 Silk Screen Process Co., displays (1950-65); Syn-Craft Display Studios (1950); James Fancelli, produce (1955); Allied Wood Products (1959); Tele-Sound Corp. (1959); Dic Concrete Corp. (1965); Buy-Rite/ Chelsea Locksmith (1970); Circle Elevator Co. (1970-75); Ambassador Hotel Supply Co. (1970); Hudson General Concrete Co. (1970); Jumper Plumbing & Heating Corp. (1970-75); Jersey-Cursley Communications, Inc. (1975); Liberty Meats (1975); Funny Farm Restaurant, Inc. (1975-93); Metropolitan Community Church of New York (1980); Triangle, Barn, Attic, Sewer, J's Hangout, gay clubs; Hellfire, club (1971-2002); Two Flags Butcher Supplies (1986-93); Hog Pit, restaurant (1995-2003)
History
In 1849, Col. Silas C. Herring purchased this triangular-shaped parcel of land from Joseph Harrison. Herring (1803-1881), born in Vermont, moved to New York City in 1834 and launched a downtown grocery business that was wiped out in the fire of 1835. In 1841, Herring became the agent for inventor Enos Wilder's "Salamander" safe, a type of fireproof, plaster-of-Paris-lined metallic safe. Herring bought the sole manufacturing rights in 1844. He profitably manufactured and marketed the safes with shrewd advertising, making him "one of the foremost manufacturers in the country," according to the New York Times. Herring's first factories were located on Water and Washington Streets.
Based on tax records, this factory building was constructed immediately after his purchase of the land in 1849. A photograph c. 1854 by Victor Prevost shows that only the southern two-thirds of the five-story factory was standing at that time; another building was located to the north. Herring's building was covered by painted advertising signs. At some point prior to 1860, the northern portion of the factory was constructed. The building then had a pedimented parapet and central belvedere. The name of the firm changed by 1870 to Herring, Farrel& Sherman.
In the 1870s, the firm expanded to a second factory, across Hudson Street at No. 666.
After Clark's death, the structure was very briefly held in 1884 by J.D. Eldridge and converted to a store-and-loft building (Alt. 193-1884, Joseph Esterbrook, Jr., architect). It was probably at this time that the cornice and storefront cornice were added. The property was acquired in 1884 by John Petit, a major figure in New York real estate, as head of John Pettit Realty Co. and owner of the Bennett Building and other valuable downtown buildings (who mysteriously disappeared in 1898). The Herring Building was next purchased by Henry J. Newton (1823-1895), a former New York piano maker (1849-58) and president of the Henry-Bonnard Bronze Co., architectural and artistic bronzework, who also owned 339-349 West 13th Street (east of the historic district). Newton became a millionaire through his investments in New York real estate.
His experiments in photography, his hobby, led to his being called the "father of the dry-plate process in America." Newton was struck and killed by a Broadway streetcar in 1895. The Herring Building was foreclosed in 1898 and acquired by the Estate of lawyer Stephen Philbin. In 1923, the old "Chelsea Landmark" was sold to the 14'~S treet and Ninth Avenue Corp., whose principals were architect James S. Maher and developer John J. Gillen [see Architects Appendix, and 401-403 and 413-435 West 141h Street]. In 1927, when the new owner was the Produce Center Realty Corp., the basement had a restaurant and bowling alley, the ground story had stores, and the upper floors were used for manufacturing. The City Bank Farmers Trust Co. held the property for ten years after its foreclosure in 1934; it was sold in 1944 to the Monash family, who retained it for nearly thirty years.
The building, until just recently, has been known for its clubs over the last three decades, and was featured in the movie "The Hours" in 2002.
This vernacular1 neo-Grec style factory building, which is largely intact, contributes to the historically-mixed architectural character and varied uses - including industrial and market-related functions -of the Gansevoort Market fistoric District. Built c. 1849, with the northern section added by 1860, it is the earliest extant purpose-built industrial building in the first phase of development of the historic district. It further contributes to the visual cohesion of the district through its unusual triangular shape and placement at a very prominent and wide intersection, and through its three brick and stone facades and late-19"-century cornice.
----About the district----
The Gansevoort Market Historic District - consisting of 104 buildings - is distinctive for its architectural character which reflects the area's long history of continuous, varied use as a place of dwelling, industry, and commerce, particularly as a marketplace, and its urban layout. The buildings, most dating from the 1840s through the 1940s, represent four major phases of development, and include both purpose-built structures, designed in then-fashionable styles, and those later adapted for market use. The architecture of the district tells the story of an important era in New York City's history when it became the financial center of the country and when its markets were expanding to serve the metropolitan region and beyond. Visual cohesion is provided to the streetscapes by the predominance of brick as a facade material; the one- to six-story scale; the presence of buildings designed by the same architects, a number of them prominent, including specialists in market-related structures; the existence of metal canopies originally installed for market purposes; and the Belgian block paving still visible on most streets. The street layout is shaped by the transition between the irregular pattern of northwestern Greenwich Village (as far north as Gansevoort Street) and the grid of the 1811 Commissioner's Plan. Unusually large and open intersections contribute to the area's unique quality, particularly where Ninth Avenue meets West 14'~S treet and Gansevoort Street (which was widened in l887), and provide sweeping vistas that showcase the unusual building typology and mixed-use quality of the district. Aside from Tribeca, the Gansevoort Market Historic District is the only remaining marketplace district that served the once-flourishing Hudson River commercial waterfront.
The earliest buildings in the historic district date from the period between 1840 and 1854, most built as rowhouses and town houses, several of which soon became very early working-class tenements (all eventually had stores on the ground floor). The area's early mixed use, however, is evident in the rare surviving early factory building (c. 1849-60), on a flatiron-shaped lot, for Col. Silas C. Herring, a nationally significant manufacturer of safes and locks, at 669-685 Hudson Street.
This mixed use, consisting of single-family houses, multiple dwellings, and industry was unusual for the period. The stretch of Ninth Avenue between Gansevoort and West 15' Streets, albeit altered and interrupted with later additions, offers the vista of a distinctive Manhattan streetscape featuring twenty buildings of the 1840s: the rowhouses at Nos. 3-7 (c. 1849) and Nos. 21-27 (c. 1844-46), the Herring factory, and culminating in the rare, picturesque ensemble of twelve rowhouses and town houses, Nos. 44-60 Ninth Avenue and 351-355 West 14th Street (c. 1841-46), at the wide, angled intersection with Hudson and West 14" Streets. Another business from this period was the woodworking factory of the prominent building firm of James C. Hoe & Co. (c. 1850-54) at 52-58 Gansevoort Street (later altered).
After the Civil War, the area began to flourish commercially as New York City solidified its position as the financial center of the country, and construction resumed in the district in 1870. Two major businesses located here were A.H. Wellington's Merchants' Print Works (1 874, S. W. Johnson), cotton printers at 416-418 West 14" Street (later altered); and the Italianate style Centennial Brewery (1876, John B. Snook) at 409-41 1 West 14' Street.
The bulk of the buildings in the district date from the 1880s through the 1920s and were designed in then-popular historical revival styles. Residential and commercial development, including a variety of building types, was particularly spurred in the 1880s by two major factors. The first was the creation of two nearby municipal markets: the open-air Farmers' or Gansevoort Market (1 879), for regional produce, at Gansevoort and Washington Streets (adjacent to the historic district), and the West Washington Market (1889), for meat, poultry, and dairy products, on the river side of West Street. From the 1880s until World War II, wholesale produce, fruit, groceries, dairy products, eggs, specialty foods, and liquor (until Prohibition) were among the dominant businesses within the district in response to the adjacent markets, particularly along Gansevoort, Little West 12', and Washington Streets. The first of the two-story, purpose-built market buildings in the district were erected in 1880. These vernacular and neo-Grec style structures typified the low-rise market buildings constructed in the district over the next 90 years: produce (or, later, meat) handling on the ground story, shielded by a metal canopy over the sidewalk, and offices on the second story.
Commercial construction during this period, which represents the highest percentage of the district's varied yet distinctive building stock, included not only low-rise purpose-built market buildings, but also, in a variety of period styles, stables buildings, and five- and six-story store-and-loft buildings and warehouses were constructed to house and serve these businesses. The warehouses, in particular, are among the most monumental structures in the district.
The second factor spurring development within the historic district was the 1878 partition of real estate owned by the Astor family, which had remained underdeveloped since John Jacob Astor 1's acquisition in 1819. Of the 104 buildings in the district, over one-third of them were constructed by the Astors and related family members. Astor improvements included the market buildings at 823-833 Washington Street and 32-36 Little West 12" Street (1880, Joseph M. Dunn, James Stroud); the distinguished Queen Anne style French flats building (with stores) at 440 West 14" Street (1887, James W. Cole), the block-long Queen Anne style produce market building at 859- 877 Washington Street (1887, Cole), and the handsome Romanesque Revival style stables building (1893, Thomas R. Jackson) for the New York Biscuit Co. (later Nabisco), the world's largest supplier of crackers, at 439-445 West 14" Street. A number of other prominent owners also invested in real estate here and began to develop their properties: the Goelet family constructed the unusual flatiron-shaped store-and-loft building at 53-61 Gansevoort Street (1887, Dunn), which housed E.S.
Burnham & Co., clam canners; James AlfredRoosevelt owned the warehouse at 400 West 14thS treet (1886, Dunn); and former New York Mayor Hugh J. Grant developed the neo-Romanesque style warehouses (1 899-1900, George P. Chappell) at 97-103 Horatio Street. The Astors and other owners gave several commissions to architects Joseph M. Dunn, who designed seven buildings in the district, and James W. Cole, who designed three buildings in the district. These multiple commissions in the then-fashionable neo-Grec or Queen Anne styles contribute to the district's visual cohesion.
Between 1897 and 1935, nearly the entire block bounded by Gansevoort, Horatio, Washington, and West Streets was developed with a handsome neo-Classical style ensemble in tan brick, by noted architects Lansing C. Holden, J. Graham Glover, and John B. Snook Sons, that included a power plant and nine cold storage warehouses for the Manhattan Refrigerating Co. (incorporated 1894). The company was responsible for installing the system of underground pipes that carried refrigeration to market-related structures throughout the district by about 1906. This infrastructure, along with the completion by the N.Y.C. Dept. of Docks of the nearby Gansevoort Piers (1894-1902) and Chelsea Piers (1902-10, with Warren & Wetmore), docks for the great trans- Atlantic steamships (and the busiest section of New York's port), had profound impacts on the district. The distribution of wholesale meat, poultry, and seafood, particularly for hotels, restaurants, and steamships, emerged as an important business throughout the district, resulting in new construction as well as bringing new uses to existing buildings. Some companies were subsidiaries of major national meatpackers, while other independent firms were among the nation's largest.
The underground refrigeration system, the new piers, and the emergence of new uses relating to the burgeoning hotel and steamship industry further triggered the 20th-century construction and architectural change and flexibility that has shaped the character of the Gansevoort Market Historic District. Typically, commercial redevelopments of neighborhoods in New York City involved the demolition of earlier buildings for structures housing new uses. However, one of the district's unique qualities is that earlier buildings were retained and altered to market uses. Earlier examples include the Centennial Brewery (409-41 1 West 14" Street), converted to meat, produce, and dairy use in 1901, and 21-27 Ninth Avenue, rowhouses adapted in 1923-24 as meat market buildings.
Over the years, the Astors continued their policy of high-quality architectural commissions by hiring distinguished architects known for their significant public, commercial, and residential buildings, such as the neo-Classical style offices and printing plant (1901-02, Trowbridge & Livingston) of P.F. Collier & Son, publisher of books and the nationally-known magazine Collier's, at 416-424 West 13' Street; the neo-Romanesque style liquor warehouse at 29-35 Ninth Avenue (1902-03, Boring & Tilton); and the Arts and Crafts style warehouse building (1913, LaFarge, Morris & Cullen) at 5 Little West 1 2 '~S treet.
The completion of the Holland Tunnel (1927), the elevated Miller Highway (1931), and the New York Central Railroad's elevated freight railway (1934) providedeasier access between the area and the metropolitan region and spurred another major phase of new low-rise construction and the functional conversion of existing buildings for market use in the district. New structures included the earlyInternationa1 style General Electric Co. annex (1929-30, Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.) at 414 West 14' Street, and the Moderne style John Morrell & Co. meat market building (1936-37, H. Peter Henschien) at 446-448 West 14'~S treet. The unusually wide Gansevoort Street assumed its distinctive character of low-rise market buildings with metal canopies at this time, through such new construction as the fruitlproduce market building (1938-39, Charles H. Stadler) at No. 46-50, and the Moderne style R&L Restaurant (1949), at No.69, and newly adapted structures, including No. 52-58 (formerly James C. Hoe & Co.), altered as a market building in 1937, and No. 60-68 (1880-81 tenements), reduced to a two-story market building in 1940.
By World War II, poultry- and meat- packing had consolidated as the main commercial activity within the district. Maritime commerce along the Hudson River waterfront declined by the 1960s, however, with the end of the ocean liner era and the rise of containerized shipping. Changes in the meat and poultry industries meant a lessening presence in this area. The Manhattan Refrigerating Co. closed in 1979 and its buildings were subsequently converted to apartments.
The completion of several more transportation and development projects (most located outside the historic district) in the 1930s spurred another major phase of new low-rise construction and functional conversion for market use of existing buildings within the historic district. Easier access was provided between the market area and the metropolitan region. The construction of the elevated Miller Highway (1929-3 1) necessitated the displacement of some produce and meat and poultry merchants in both the Gansevoort and West Washington Markets, including the demolition of several buildings at the latter. The Port of New York Authority built the Union Inland Terminal No. 1 (1931-32, Abbott, Merkt & Co.), a unified truck-rail terminal (modeled functionally after the Starrett-Lehigh Building), just northeast of the district and occupying the entire block at Ninth Avenue and West 15" Street.
The New York Central Railroad's elevated freight railway (193 1-34) passed through some thirty buildings on its route southward to the new St. John's Park Freight Terminal at West and Clarkson Streets. This railway also used part of the Gansevoort Market site, and additionally, the City constructed a meat processing plant on the market site (1939). The Lincoln Tunnel (1937) provided a second automotive route to New Jersey. The Ninth Avenue el, which ran through the district, was demolished (c. 1940); streetcar tracks located below the el had been taken up in 1936.
The first new purpose-built low-scale (one-story) market building in the historic district was 14-20 Little West 12" Street (1928, John B. Snook Sons), for the Wendel family and used initially by produce merchants. The P.F. Collier & Son building at 416-424 West 13" Street became a warehouse of the General Electric Co. in 1929; an early International style annex (1929-30, Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.) was constructed next door at 414 West 14" Street. Owned by Vincent Astor, this was the last of the Astor improvements within the district. 13 and 15 Little West 12' Street (1933, Martin Smith) were one-story fruit market buildings. Designed in the Moderne style were the John Morrell & Co. meat market building (1936-37, H. Peter Henschien) at 446-448 West 14th Street; the meat market building at 837-843 Washington Street (1938, David M. Oltarsh); and the fruitlproduce market building at 46-50 Gansevoort Street (1938-39, Charles H. Stadler).
Built at a time when the growing prevalence of the automobile resulted in the predominance of new market types throughout the U.S. (such as drive-in markets, chain grocery stores, and supermarkets), these buildings are rare and late examples of the older market building typology.34 Many of the buildings in the district that were architecturally adapted for market functions were properties acquired through foreclosure at the height of the Depression. Most of these buildings were functionally maximized at two stories (vacant, formerly residential, upper stories were no longer necessary): the lower story was refrigerated for produce or meat use and the upper story held offices. The unusually wide Gansevoort Street assumed its distinctive character of low-rise market buildings with metal canopies at this time, largely through such newly-adapted structures, including the vernacular style No. 52-58 (formerly James C. Hoe & Co.), altered as a fruit and produce market building in 1937 (S. Walter Katz); the neo-Grec style No. 60-68 (five 1880-81 tenements), reduced to a two-story market building in 1940 (Voorhees, Walker, Foley & Smith); and No. 7 1-73 (aka 8 17- 821 Washington Street) (three 1886-87 Queen Anne style French flats buildings), reduced to three stories in 1940 for use as a meat market building. The neo-Grec and utilitarian style 823-833 Washington Street and neo-Grec style 32-36 Little West 12" Street, 1880 two-story market buildings, were also altered in 1940-41 for meat merchants.
By World War II, poultry- and meat- packing had consolidated as the main commercial activity throughout the district. The opening of the Queens Live Poultry Terminal Market (1941) caused poultry dealers to move from the West Washington Market, replaced in part by produce merchants. The creation in 1950 of the Gansevoort Market Meat Center on the site of Gansevoort Market and the demolition of the remaining West Washington Market buildings, with the associated displacement of the businesses at both locations, hastened changes within the district. In 1959, the Gansevoort Market area was referred to in the New York Times as "the largest meat and poultry receiving market in the world. In the district, 408-412 West 13" Street (1941, Charles N. & Selig Whinston) was a new two-story market building used by hides/skins and meat businesses, while 36- 40 Gansevoort Street (aka 831-835 Greenwich Street) (1947-48, Horace Ginsbern & Assocs.), for poultry businesses, was the last new purpose-built market building in the district. The Moderne style R & L Restaurant (1949), 69 Gansevoort Street, resulted from the alteration of a three-story house.
Alterations associated with conversions to meat market uses included 809-813 Washington Street (aka 70-74 Gansevoort Street) (1940-42, Voorhees, Walker, Foley & Smith), a freight trucking depot altered in 1950; 402-404 and 406 West 13th Street (1840s rowhouses) altered in1950 and 1955 (Abraham L. Seiden); and 15 and 13 Little West 12" Street (c. 1961 and 1969 additions, bylattributed to Seiden).
Today, the Gansevoort Market Historic District is a vibrant neighborhood of remaining meatpackers, high-end retail commerce, restaurants, offices, clubs, galleries, and apartments, that retains, despite recent changes, a strong and integral sense of place as a market district, due to its distinctive streetscapes, metal canopies, notable buildings, both purpose-built and those adapted over the years for market use, and unusual street pattern with its Belgian block paving.
- From the 2003 NYCLPC Landmark Designation Report
Batuwangala Maha Vidyalaya's students participated for their annual excursion from 03.08.2009 to 07.08.2009.This event was organized by the Buddhist Association of the college and was proposed at the English literary Association.The whole plan was to cover the most impotent places of the Sri Lankan culture.The late Kingdoms of ancient Sri lanka was given priority.We left the school early morning at about 3am of 03.08.2009 and traveled through Mathugama,Horana,Aththanagalla and reached to Dambulla area by 2pm.We had the day one break fast near Horana.We first visited the ' Namal Uyana temple near Dambulla,Sri Lanka.This temple was a full of collections of pictures.
The pictures were about the misbehavior of the people in this birth and consequences of the deeds when they enter the next birth.It was put in to pictures in a way kind of calling to one to refrain from bad deeds.Students were awarded of the Eight fold path way revealed by Loard Bhudhdha and the statues of the temple was very helpful to depict.After taking the lunch of the day one @ the same temple we left for Dambulla Rock temple.
Dambulla Rock temple is more impotent to Art Students coz of its wall paintings.Dambulla temple is one of the masters peace of Buddhist Rock cravings and the watershed technologies used by the ancient people.All the students climbed up to the caves and worshiped there.there after We left for Anuradhapura where our day one accommodations were readied.The Night meal was cooked by the accompanied parents with the help of teachers and Senior Girls.Senior Boys were divided in to groups and assigned duties Accordingly.The parents woke up early morning with teachers and again prepared breakfast and lunch all together.We server break fast and containerized the Lunch.We left the technical College of Anuradhapura At about 7.30am And reached to the Isurumuniya Raja Maha Viharaya by 10 minutes traveling.
Isurumuniya is another impotent place for Sinhala Buddhist.there is a 6th Century Gupta style carving. The woman, seated on the man's lap, lifts a warning finger, probably as a manifestation of her coyness; but the man carries on regardless."
The figures may represent The Great King Dutugemunu's son Saliya and the law caste (Sadol Kula) maiden Asokamala whom he loved. It's known that he gave up the throne for her.
After the Isurumuniya we left for 'mirisaweliya' next to it.Mirisawetiya was built by the great King Dutugamunu who reigned during the time (161-137 BC) and united Sri Lanka under a single flag.
It is believed that King Dutugamunu had a sceptre that contained a scared relic of the Buddha. While going to the tank “Tissawewa”, for a water festival, the King has planted the scepter in a certain place. When he came back, it is said that his men could not remove the scepter from the place.
Witnessing the miracle, the King decided to build a dagaba enclosing the scepter. Thus was the creation of Mirisawetiya.
The significance of the scepter is the fact that this was the king's "victory scepter" for his battles with Elara, and by building the Dagaba around it shows the tremendous dedication that the King had for Buddhism and his spirituality.Mirisawetiya was the first dagaba built by the great king Dutugamunu.
After that we left for Ruwanweli Saya.The Ruwanwelisaya is a stupa in Sri Lanka, considered a marvel for its architectural qualities and sacred to many Buddhists all over the world. It was built by King Dutugemunu, who became lord of all Sri Lanka after a war in which the Chola King Elara, were defeated. It is also known as Mahathupa, Swarnamali Chaitya and Rathnamali Dagaba.
The stupa is also one of the Solosmasthana (the 16 places of veneration) and the Atamasthana (the 8 places of veneration in the ancient sacred city of Anuradhapura). The stupa is one of the world's tallest monuments, standing at 300 ft (92 m) and with a circumference of 950 ft (292 m).
Then we left for Jaya Shi Maha Bodhiya.The 'Bo' ( 'Bodhi') tree or Pipal (ficus religiosa) was planted as a cutting brought from India by by emperor Ashoka's daughter, the Princess Sangamitta, at some point after 236 BC. Guardians have kept uninterrupted watch over the tree ever since. There are other Bo trees around the Sir Maha Bodhi which stands on the highest terrace. In April a large number of pilgrims arrive to make offering during the Snana Pooja, and to bathe the tree with milk. Every 12th year the ceremony is particularly auspicious.
After the Sri Maha Bhodiya we vent to worship Thuparamaya.Thera Mahinda him self had introduce Theravada Buddhism and also chetiya worship to Sri Lanka. At his request King Devanampiyatissa built Thuparamaya in which was enshrined the collarbone of the Buddha and is considered as the first dagaba built in Sri Lanka, after the introduction of Buddhism. This is considered the earliest monument of chronicled Sri Lanka. The name Thuparamaya comes from "stupa" and "aramaya" which is a residential complex for monks.
This chetiya was built in the shape of a heap of paddy. This dagaba was destroyed from time to time. During the reign of King Agbo II it was completely destroyed and the King restored it. What we have today is the construction of the dagaba, done in 1862 AD. As it is today, after several renovations, in the course of the centuries, the monument has a diameter of 59 ft (18 m), at the base. The dome is 11 feet 4 inches (3.45 m) in height from the ground, 164½ ft (50.1 m) in diameter. The compound is paved with granite and there are 2 rows of stone pillars round the dagaba. During the early period vatadage was built round the dagaba.
After that we went to see Sandakadapahana.The Best of the Moon Stones we have in Sri Lanka is the one which is at the entrance to the palace of King Mahasen. According to Dr. Senarath Paranawithana, there is a deep philosophy underlying these carvings found in this Moon Stone.
We can clearly see the Hindu influence on the Moon Stones of Polonnaruwa . In the Moonstones of Anuradhapura , among the animals carved out was an ox. Hindus consider the oxen as sacred. Hence we do not see the ox in the Moon Stones of Polonnaruwa.
Then we moved to see the Samadhi Statue.Samadhi statue is a statue situated at Mahamevuna Park in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka. It is said that this is one of the best pieces of sculpture. The statue is 8 feet in height and made of granite and the Dhyana mudra is symbolished - The posture of meditation in which Buddha sits in the cross - legged position with upturned palms, placed one over the other on the lap.
Then we visited"kuttam Pokuna".One of the best specimen of bathing tanks or pools in ancient Sri Lanka is the pair of pools known as "Kuttam Pokuna" (Twin Ponds/Pools). The said pair of pools were built by the Sinhalese in the ancient kingdom of Anuradhapura. These are considered one of the significant achievements in the field of hydrological engineering and outstanding architectural and artistic creations of the ancient Sinhalese.
A garden was landscaped which separates the two ponds which in length is 18 1/2 ft. The larger pool of the two is 132ft by 51 ft, while the smaller pool is 91ft by 51 ft. The depths of the two pools is 14ft and 18ft for the smaller pool and the larger pool respectively.
The faces of the pools were cut granite slabs which includes the bottom and the sides of the pool. A wall was also built around the pool which encloses the compound. Flights of steps are seen on both ends of the pool decorated with punkalas, or pots of abundance and scroll design. Embankments were constructed to enable monks to bathe using pots or other utensils. Water to the pools were transferred through underground ducts and filtered before flowing to the pool and in a similar fashion the water was emptied.
Dr. Senerath Paranavithana was actively involved in the restoration of the ponds, in which small figures of fish, a conch, a crab and a dancing woman were found in the bottom.
With kuttampokuna we left the Ancient city Anuradhapura.Students wanted to have there Lunch on a Tank Dam.So we had our day two lunch on the dam of Nuwara wewa,Anuradhapura.But before lunch we did not forget to feel the breeze and the cold of the water.
By 2 pm day two we finished the Anuradhapura Visiting and left for Sigiriya.Student were curious and active.They took just 1hour to climb up to the Sigiya.Sigiriya (Lion's rock) is an ancient rock fortress and palace ruin situated in the central Matale District of Sri Lanka, surrounded by the remains of an extensive network of gardens, reservoirs, and other structures. A popular tourist destination, Sigiriya is also renowned for its ancient paintings (frescos), which are reminiscent of the Ajanta Caves of India. The Sigiriya was built during the reign of King Kassapa I (AD 477 – 495), and it is one of the seven World Heritage Sites of Sri Lanka.
Sigiriya may have been inhabited through prehistoric times. It was used as a rock-shelter mountain monastery from about the 5th century BC, with caves prepared and donated by devotees to the Buddhist Sangha. The garden and palace were built by King Kasyapa. Following King Kasyapa's death, it was again a monastery complex up to about the 14th century, after which it was abandoned. The ruins were discovered in 1907 by British explorer John Still. The Sigiri inscriptions were deciphered by the archaeologist Senarath Paranavithana in his renowned two-volume work, published by Oxford, Sigiri Graffiti. He also wrote the popular book "Story of Sigiriya".
The Mahavamsa, the ancient historical record of Sri Lanka, describes King Kasyapa as the son of King Dhatusena. Kasyapa murdered his father by walling him alive and then usurping the throne which rightfully belonged to his brother Mogallana, Dhatusena's son by the true queen. Mogallana fled to India to escape being assassinated by Kasyapa but vowed revenge. In India he raised an army with the intention of returning and retaking the throne of Sri Lanka which he considered was rightfully his. Knowing the inevitable return of Mogallana, Kasyapa is said to have built his palace on the summit of Sigiriya as a fortress and pleasure palace. Mogallana finally arrived and declared war. During the battle Kasyapa's armies abandoned him and he committed suicide by falling on his sword. Chronicles and lore say that the battle-elephant on which Kasyapa was mounted changed course to take a strategic advantage, but the army misinterpreted the movement as the King having opted to retreat, prompting the army to abandon the king altogether. Moggallana returned the capital to Anuradapura, converting Sigiriya into a monastery complex.
Alternative stories have the primary builder of Sigiriya as King Dhatusena, with Kasyapa finishing the work in honour of his father. Still other stories have Kasyapa as a playboy king, with Sigiriya a pleasure palace. Even Kasyapa's eventual fate is mutable. In some versions he is assassinated by poison administered by a concubine. In others he cuts his own throat when isolated in his final battle. Still further interpretations have the site as the work of a Buddhist community, with no military function at all.
We did not miss the beauty of sigiriya and to have some pictures of it.After the Sigiriya we Finished day two.Our day two Accommodation was ready @ Royal college Polonnaruwa.it was a nice experience coz all the students should experience a bath in a canal.most of them this was the first time to bath in a canal.
In early morning after taking the breakfast and the contained lunch we left to see polonnaruwa,the late kingdom of Sri Lanka.First fo all we went to see the statue of King Parakramabhahu facing the Parakrama Samudraya.it was another master peace of rock carvings.
then we traveled on the Dam of Parakrama Samudraya,the leargest tank of the polonnaruwa,and captured some occasions.We could visit the museum in frat of the Parakrama Samudraya.
After that we left for Dimbulagala.But we saw the Mahaweli river at Manampitiya and the newly built bridge.So we stopped there for the day three lunch.Students got the first chance to have a bath in the Mahaweli River.The water was cald and so clean even the dry season in the polonnaruwa area.it was so hot but still the water of Mahaweli river gave the full satisfaction of having a birth.with in 40 Minutes we finished the bathing and started to have our lunch.Students were very happy to have their lunch on a river bank.Dimbulagala is Another impotent Rock in polonnaruwa.After the lunch we left for Dimbulagala temple and visited the temple.After that we left for Mahiyanganaya.Our aim is to visit the ancient people in Sri lanka and to talk to them.We reached to the Dambana with the dawn an could talk to some Ancient people there.A gang of people there entertained us with some beautiful Veddas dance and songs.
After Dambana we went to our day three resting place.We stayed in a resthall at Mahiyanganaya.Like the two previous days cooking and containing food for the day was happened and we went to see mahiyangana Dagoba.Mahiyanganaya is one of a place where the lord Buddha has visited.We could capture the beauty of the dagoba to our lenses.
After that we went to see Soraborawewa.Another master piece of Tank technology by Ancient Sri lanken People.At sorabora wewa we went on a cane trip on the river and we found one capable oarsman with us on board.He too joined with other oarsman and took us around the Soraborawewa.
Then we left for Kandy.The road to Kandy to Mahiyanganaya was under construction but our two drivers took us to Kandy by 4.30pm.then we went to see Sri Dalandamaligawa.But on the way we impotent guests there.
According to Sri Lankan legends, when the Buddha died, his body was cremated in a sandalwood pyre at Kusinara in India and his left canine tooth was retrieved from the funeral pyre by Arahat Khema. Khema then gave it to King Brahmadatte for veneration. It became a royal possession in Brahmadatte's country and was kept in the city of Dantapuri (present day Puri in Orissa).
A belief grew that whoever possessed the Sacred Tooth Relic had a divine right to rule that land. Wars were fought to take possession of the relic. 800 years after the Buddha's death, in the 4th century CE, the tooth came into the possession of King Guhaseeva of Kalinga, which roughly corresponds to the present day state of Orissa.
Kalinga had become a Buddhist and begun to worship the Sacred Tooth relic. This caused discontent among some of the citizens, who went to King Paandu and said that King Guhaseeva had stopped believing in god and that he had started to worship a tooth.
King Paandu decided to destroy the relic, and ordered to it brought to the city. It is said that, as the tooth arrived at the city, a miracle occurred, and King Paandu converted to Buddhism.
When King Ksheeradara heard, he went with his army to attack Paandu in the city of Palalus. The invaders were defeated before reaching the city, and King Ksheeradara died.
A prince from the city of Udeni who had become a Buddhist came to worship the sacred tooth. King Guhaseeva was pleased with him, and let him marry his daughter. The prince was known as Dantha and the princess as Hemamala.
When they heard that King Ksheeradara had died in the war, his sons raised a large army to attack King Guhaseeva and destroy the relic. They entered the city, but King Guhaseeva secretly sent Dantha and Hemamala out of the city, with the relic.
According to legend, Hemamali hid the relic in her hair ornament and the royal couple disguised themselves as Brahmins in order to avoid discovery. They set sail from Tamralipti, a port at the mouth of the river Ganges, and landed in Sri Lanka at the port of Lankapattana (now Ilankeiturei).
It is said that Sri Lanka was chosen as the new home for the tooth relic because the Lord Buddha had declared that his religion would be safe in Sri Lanka for 2,500 years.[citation needed]
At the time of Dantha's and Hemamali's arrival on the island, King Kirti Sri Megavanna or Kithsirimevan ruled Sri Lanka. The King was overjoyed when he heard the news and warmly welcomed the royal couple and received the Sacred Tooth Relic with great veneration. He built a beautiful palace within the Royal Palace Complex itself and enshrined the Relic in it. Thereafter, he ordered that an annual perahera be held in honour of the Sacred Relic.
As time went on, as the land was threatened with foreign invasions, the seat of the kingdom was moved from Anuradhapura to Polonnaruwa, then to Dambadeniya and other cities. Upon each change of capital, a new palace was built to enshrine the Relic. Finally, it was brought to Kandy where it is at present, in the Sri Dalada Maligawa temple.
The Sacred Tooth Relic came to be regarded as a symbolic representation of the living Buddha and it is on this basis that there grew up a series of offerings, rituals, and ceremonies. These are conducted under the supervision of the two Mahanayake Theros of Malwatte, Asgiriya Chapters, and Diyawadana Nilame of the Maligawa. These have a hierarchy of officials and temple functionaries to perform the services and rituals.
Finally we visited the Peradeniya botonical guarden.Royal Botanical Garden, Peradeniya is located in close proximity to the city of Kandy in the Central Province of Sri Lanka. It is renowned for the collection the variety of Orchids,and has more than 300 varieties of Orchids, spices, medicinal plants and palms trees attach it is the National Herbarium. Total land mass of the botanical garden is 147 acres, 460 Meters above sea level with a 200 day annual rain fall, it is managed by the Division of National Botanic Gardens of the Department of Agriculture.
Finally we finished our Annual Excursion with lot of Joy and Knowledge,Experiences and lot more.We would like to thank the Two Rivers who took us all around this Island and parents,Teachers who helped to make this event a success.
Asbestos asphalt floor tile rendered friable by aggressive manual scraping removal method.
Not all asbestos floor tile were created equal, where asphalt-based tile appear to disintegrate more readily than vinyl-based tile, and in shard-like fragments.
Perhaps an example of how NOT to remove asbestos-containing floor tile, activities in this work area were promptly halted; application of wetting-agent adequately administered, and waste debris promptly containerized.
Batuwangala Maha Vidyalaya's students participated for their annual excursion from 03.08.2009 to 07.08.2009.This event was organized by the Buddhist Association of the college and was proposed at the English literary Association.The whole plan was to cover the most impotent places of the Sri Lankan culture.The late Kingdoms of ancient Sri lanka was given priority.We left the school early morning at about 3am of 03.08.2009 and traveled through Mathugama,Horana,Aththanagalla and reached to Dambulla area by 2pm.We had the day one break fast near Horana.We first visited the ' Namal Uyana temple near Dambulla,Sri Lanka.This temple was a full of collections of pictures.
The pictures were about the misbehavior of the people in this birth and consequences of the deeds when they enter the next birth.It was put in to pictures in a way kind of calling to one to refrain from bad deeds.Students were awarded of the Eight fold path way revealed by Loard Bhudhdha and the statues of the temple was very helpful to depict.After taking the lunch of the day one @ the same temple we left for Dambulla Rock temple.
Dambulla Rock temple is more impotent to Art Students coz of its wall paintings.Dambulla temple is one of the masters peace of Buddhist Rock cravings and the watershed technologies used by the ancient people.All the students climbed up to the caves and worshiped there.there after We left for Anuradhapura where our day one accommodations were readied.The Night meal was cooked by the accompanied parents with the help of teachers and Senior Girls.Senior Boys were divided in to groups and assigned duties Accordingly.The parents woke up early morning with teachers and again prepared breakfast and lunch all together.We server break fast and containerized the Lunch.We left the technical College of Anuradhapura At about 7.30am And reached to the Isurumuniya Raja Maha Viharaya by 10 minutes traveling.
Isurumuniya is another impotent place for Sinhala Buddhist.there is a 6th Century Gupta style carving. The woman, seated on the man's lap, lifts a warning finger, probably as a manifestation of her coyness; but the man carries on regardless."
The figures may represent The Great King Dutugemunu's son Saliya and the law caste (Sadol Kula) maiden Asokamala whom he loved. It's known that he gave up the throne for her.
After the Isurumuniya we left for 'mirisaweliya' next to it.Mirisawetiya was built by the great King Dutugamunu who reigned during the time (161-137 BC) and united Sri Lanka under a single flag.
It is believed that King Dutugamunu had a sceptre that contained a scared relic of the Buddha. While going to the tank “Tissawewa”, for a water festival, the King has planted the scepter in a certain place. When he came back, it is said that his men could not remove the scepter from the place.
Witnessing the miracle, the King decided to build a dagaba enclosing the scepter. Thus was the creation of Mirisawetiya.
The significance of the scepter is the fact that this was the king's "victory scepter" for his battles with Elara, and by building the Dagaba around it shows the tremendous dedication that the King had for Buddhism and his spirituality.Mirisawetiya was the first dagaba built by the great king Dutugamunu.
After that we left for Ruwanweli Saya.The Ruwanwelisaya is a stupa in Sri Lanka, considered a marvel for its architectural qualities and sacred to many Buddhists all over the world. It was built by King Dutugemunu, who became lord of all Sri Lanka after a war in which the Chola King Elara, were defeated. It is also known as Mahathupa, Swarnamali Chaitya and Rathnamali Dagaba.
The stupa is also one of the Solosmasthana (the 16 places of veneration) and the Atamasthana (the 8 places of veneration in the ancient sacred city of Anuradhapura). The stupa is one of the world's tallest monuments, standing at 300 ft (92 m) and with a circumference of 950 ft (292 m).
Then we left for Jaya Shi Maha Bodhiya.The 'Bo' ( 'Bodhi') tree or Pipal (ficus religiosa) was planted as a cutting brought from India by by emperor Ashoka's daughter, the Princess Sangamitta, at some point after 236 BC. Guardians have kept uninterrupted watch over the tree ever since. There are other Bo trees around the Sir Maha Bodhi which stands on the highest terrace. In April a large number of pilgrims arrive to make offering during the Snana Pooja, and to bathe the tree with milk. Every 12th year the ceremony is particularly auspicious.
After the Sri Maha Bhodiya we vent to worship Thuparamaya.Thera Mahinda him self had introduce Theravada Buddhism and also chetiya worship to Sri Lanka. At his request King Devanampiyatissa built Thuparamaya in which was enshrined the collarbone of the Buddha and is considered as the first dagaba built in Sri Lanka, after the introduction of Buddhism. This is considered the earliest monument of chronicled Sri Lanka. The name Thuparamaya comes from "stupa" and "aramaya" which is a residential complex for monks.
This chetiya was built in the shape of a heap of paddy. This dagaba was destroyed from time to time. During the reign of King Agbo II it was completely destroyed and the King restored it. What we have today is the construction of the dagaba, done in 1862 AD. As it is today, after several renovations, in the course of the centuries, the monument has a diameter of 59 ft (18 m), at the base. The dome is 11 feet 4 inches (3.45 m) in height from the ground, 164½ ft (50.1 m) in diameter. The compound is paved with granite and there are 2 rows of stone pillars round the dagaba. During the early period vatadage was built round the dagaba.
After that we went to see Sandakadapahana.The Best of the Moon Stones we have in Sri Lanka is the one which is at the entrance to the palace of King Mahasen. According to Dr. Senarath Paranawithana, there is a deep philosophy underlying these carvings found in this Moon Stone.
We can clearly see the Hindu influence on the Moon Stones of Polonnaruwa . In the Moonstones of Anuradhapura , among the animals carved out was an ox. Hindus consider the oxen as sacred. Hence we do not see the ox in the Moon Stones of Polonnaruwa.
Then we moved to see the Samadhi Statue.Samadhi statue is a statue situated at Mahamevuna Park in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka. It is said that this is one of the best pieces of sculpture. The statue is 8 feet in height and made of granite and the Dhyana mudra is symbolished - The posture of meditation in which Buddha sits in the cross - legged position with upturned palms, placed one over the other on the lap.
Then we visited"kuttam Pokuna".One of the best specimen of bathing tanks or pools in ancient Sri Lanka is the pair of pools known as "Kuttam Pokuna" (Twin Ponds/Pools). The said pair of pools were built by the Sinhalese in the ancient kingdom of Anuradhapura. These are considered one of the significant achievements in the field of hydrological engineering and outstanding architectural and artistic creations of the ancient Sinhalese.
A garden was landscaped which separates the two ponds which in length is 18 1/2 ft. The larger pool of the two is 132ft by 51 ft, while the smaller pool is 91ft by 51 ft. The depths of the two pools is 14ft and 18ft for the smaller pool and the larger pool respectively.
The faces of the pools were cut granite slabs which includes the bottom and the sides of the pool. A wall was also built around the pool which encloses the compound. Flights of steps are seen on both ends of the pool decorated with punkalas, or pots of abundance and scroll design. Embankments were constructed to enable monks to bathe using pots or other utensils. Water to the pools were transferred through underground ducts and filtered before flowing to the pool and in a similar fashion the water was emptied.
Dr. Senerath Paranavithana was actively involved in the restoration of the ponds, in which small figures of fish, a conch, a crab and a dancing woman were found in the bottom.
With kuttampokuna we left the Ancient city Anuradhapura.Students wanted to have there Lunch on a Tank Dam.So we had our day two lunch on the dam of Nuwara wewa,Anuradhapura.But before lunch we did not forget to feel the breeze and the cold of the water.
By 2 pm day two we finished the Anuradhapura Visiting and left for Sigiriya.Student were curious and active.They took just 1hour to climb up to the Sigiya.Sigiriya (Lion's rock) is an ancient rock fortress and palace ruin situated in the central Matale District of Sri Lanka, surrounded by the remains of an extensive network of gardens, reservoirs, and other structures. A popular tourist destination, Sigiriya is also renowned for its ancient paintings (frescos), which are reminiscent of the Ajanta Caves of India. The Sigiriya was built during the reign of King Kassapa I (AD 477 – 495), and it is one of the seven World Heritage Sites of Sri Lanka.
Sigiriya may have been inhabited through prehistoric times. It was used as a rock-shelter mountain monastery from about the 5th century BC, with caves prepared and donated by devotees to the Buddhist Sangha. The garden and palace were built by King Kasyapa. Following King Kasyapa's death, it was again a monastery complex up to about the 14th century, after which it was abandoned. The ruins were discovered in 1907 by British explorer John Still. The Sigiri inscriptions were deciphered by the archaeologist Senarath Paranavithana in his renowned two-volume work, published by Oxford, Sigiri Graffiti. He also wrote the popular book "Story of Sigiriya".
The Mahavamsa, the ancient historical record of Sri Lanka, describes King Kasyapa as the son of King Dhatusena. Kasyapa murdered his father by walling him alive and then usurping the throne which rightfully belonged to his brother Mogallana, Dhatusena's son by the true queen. Mogallana fled to India to escape being assassinated by Kasyapa but vowed revenge. In India he raised an army with the intention of returning and retaking the throne of Sri Lanka which he considered was rightfully his. Knowing the inevitable return of Mogallana, Kasyapa is said to have built his palace on the summit of Sigiriya as a fortress and pleasure palace. Mogallana finally arrived and declared war. During the battle Kasyapa's armies abandoned him and he committed suicide by falling on his sword. Chronicles and lore say that the battle-elephant on which Kasyapa was mounted changed course to take a strategic advantage, but the army misinterpreted the movement as the King having opted to retreat, prompting the army to abandon the king altogether. Moggallana returned the capital to Anuradapura, converting Sigiriya into a monastery complex.
Alternative stories have the primary builder of Sigiriya as King Dhatusena, with Kasyapa finishing the work in honour of his father. Still other stories have Kasyapa as a playboy king, with Sigiriya a pleasure palace. Even Kasyapa's eventual fate is mutable. In some versions he is assassinated by poison administered by a concubine. In others he cuts his own throat when isolated in his final battle. Still further interpretations have the site as the work of a Buddhist community, with no military function at all.
We did not miss the beauty of sigiriya and to have some pictures of it.After the Sigiriya we Finished day two.Our day two Accommodation was ready @ Royal college Polonnaruwa.it was a nice experience coz all the students should experience a bath in a canal.most of them this was the first time to bath in a canal.
In early morning after taking the breakfast and the contained lunch we left to see polonnaruwa,the late kingdom of Sri Lanka.First fo all we went to see the statue of King Parakramabhahu facing the Parakrama Samudraya.it was another master peace of rock carvings.
then we traveled on the Dam of Parakrama Samudraya,the leargest tank of the polonnaruwa,and captured some occasions.We could visit the museum in frat of the Parakrama Samudraya.
After that we left for Dimbulagala.But we saw the Mahaweli river at Manampitiya and the newly built bridge.So we stopped there for the day three lunch.Students got the first chance to have a bath in the Mahaweli River.The water was cald and so clean even the dry season in the polonnaruwa area.it was so hot but still the water of Mahaweli river gave the full satisfaction of having a birth.with in 40 Minutes we finished the bathing and started to have our lunch.Students were very happy to have their lunch on a river bank.Dimbulagala is Another impotent Rock in polonnaruwa.After the lunch we left for Dimbulagala temple and visited the temple.After that we left for Mahiyanganaya.Our aim is to visit the ancient people in Sri lanka and to talk to them.We reached to the Dambana with the dawn an could talk to some Ancient people there.A gang of people there entertained us with some beautiful Veddas dance and songs.
After Dambana we went to our day three resting place.We stayed in a resthall at Mahiyanganaya.Like the two previous days cooking and containing food for the day was happened and we went to see mahiyangana Dagoba.Mahiyanganaya is one of a place where the lord Buddha has visited.We could capture the beauty of the dagoba to our lenses.
After that we went to see Soraborawewa.Another master piece of Tank technology by Ancient Sri lanken People.At sorabora wewa we went on a cane trip on the river and we found one capable oarsman with us on board.He too joined with other oarsman and took us around the Soraborawewa.
Then we left for Kandy.The road to Kandy to Mahiyanganaya was under construction but our two drivers took us to Kandy by 4.30pm.then we went to see Sri Dalandamaligawa.But on the way we impotent guests there.
According to Sri Lankan legends, when the Buddha died, his body was cremated in a sandalwood pyre at Kusinara in India and his left canine tooth was retrieved from the funeral pyre by Arahat Khema. Khema then gave it to King Brahmadatte for veneration. It became a royal possession in Brahmadatte's country and was kept in the city of Dantapuri (present day Puri in Orissa).
A belief grew that whoever possessed the Sacred Tooth Relic had a divine right to rule that land. Wars were fought to take possession of the relic. 800 years after the Buddha's death, in the 4th century CE, the tooth came into the possession of King Guhaseeva of Kalinga, which roughly corresponds to the present day state of Orissa.
Kalinga had become a Buddhist and begun to worship the Sacred Tooth relic. This caused discontent among some of the citizens, who went to King Paandu and said that King Guhaseeva had stopped believing in god and that he had started to worship a tooth.
King Paandu decided to destroy the relic, and ordered to it brought to the city. It is said that, as the tooth arrived at the city, a miracle occurred, and King Paandu converted to Buddhism.
When King Ksheeradara heard, he went with his army to attack Paandu in the city of Palalus. The invaders were defeated before reaching the city, and King Ksheeradara died.
A prince from the city of Udeni who had become a Buddhist came to worship the sacred tooth. King Guhaseeva was pleased with him, and let him marry his daughter. The prince was known as Dantha and the princess as Hemamala.
When they heard that King Ksheeradara had died in the war, his sons raised a large army to attack King Guhaseeva and destroy the relic. They entered the city, but King Guhaseeva secretly sent Dantha and Hemamala out of the city, with the relic.
According to legend, Hemamali hid the relic in her hair ornament and the royal couple disguised themselves as Brahmins in order to avoid discovery. They set sail from Tamralipti, a port at the mouth of the river Ganges, and landed in Sri Lanka at the port of Lankapattana (now Ilankeiturei).
It is said that Sri Lanka was chosen as the new home for the tooth relic because the Lord Buddha had declared that his religion would be safe in Sri Lanka for 2,500 years.[citation needed]
At the time of Dantha's and Hemamali's arrival on the island, King Kirti Sri Megavanna or Kithsirimevan ruled Sri Lanka. The King was overjoyed when he heard the news and warmly welcomed the royal couple and received the Sacred Tooth Relic with great veneration. He built a beautiful palace within the Royal Palace Complex itself and enshrined the Relic in it. Thereafter, he ordered that an annual perahera be held in honour of the Sacred Relic.
As time went on, as the land was threatened with foreign invasions, the seat of the kingdom was moved from Anuradhapura to Polonnaruwa, then to Dambadeniya and other cities. Upon each change of capital, a new palace was built to enshrine the Relic. Finally, it was brought to Kandy where it is at present, in the Sri Dalada Maligawa temple.
The Sacred Tooth Relic came to be regarded as a symbolic representation of the living Buddha and it is on this basis that there grew up a series of offerings, rituals, and ceremonies. These are conducted under the supervision of the two Mahanayake Theros of Malwatte, Asgiriya Chapters, and Diyawadana Nilame of the Maligawa. These have a hierarchy of officials and temple functionaries to perform the services and rituals.
Finally we visited the Peradeniya botonical guarden.Royal Botanical Garden, Peradeniya is located in close proximity to the city of Kandy in the Central Province of Sri Lanka. It is renowned for the collection the variety of Orchids,and has more than 300 varieties of Orchids, spices, medicinal plants and palms trees attach it is the National Herbarium. Total land mass of the botanical garden is 147 acres, 460 Meters above sea level with a 200 day annual rain fall, it is managed by the Division of National Botanic Gardens of the Department of Agriculture.
Finally we finished our Annual Excursion with lot of Joy and Knowledge,Experiences and lot more.We would like to thank the Two Rivers who took us all around this Island and parents,Teachers who helped to make this event a success.
Greenwich Village, Manhattan
No. 354 West 11th Street is a relatively rare surviving residential building of the early period of the mixed-use development that came to characterize the far western section of Greenwich Village, which was built up with residences for the middle and professional classes, industry, and transportation-and maritime-related commerce. It is also one of the best extant examples of the Greek Revival style rowhouses of the 1830s-40s located in the Hudson River waterfront section of Manhattan, specifically the area west of the Greenwich Village Historic District between West 14th Street and Lower Manhattan. The Greek Revival style characteristics of the house are its 3story height; machine-pressed red brickwork laid in stretcher bond; stoop and areaway with wrought-ironwork; entrance with pilasters, entablature, sidelights, and transom; molded brownstone lintels; and flat roofline.
The building was constructed c.1841-42, apparently for William B. Fash, a carver and “composition ornament” manufacturer, and his wife, Frances, who were foreclosed in 1843. It was next owned, until 1852, by attorney Edwin L.B. Brooks and his wife, Catherine. They never resided here, but leased it to merchant-class tenants, as did subsequent owners. The first long-term owners of the property, from 1866 to 1923, were the family of Friedrich C. Knubel, a German-born grocer. The Knubels lived in No. 354 in 1870-75, and in 1871 extended the house in the rear; it is likely the pressed metal cornice on the front facade dates from this period. A son, Frederick Hermann Knubel, born the year they moved into the house, went on to study for the ministry and became the first president of the United Lutheran Church in America (1918-45). In the 20th and 21st centuries, the building has housed single-family and multiple residents.
DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS
The Development of the Far West Village
In the early 17th century, the area now known as the Far West Village was a Lenape encampment for fishing and planting known as Sapokanican, identified through archeology and historical documents at the foot of Gansevoort Street. During Dutch rule, the second director general (1633-37) of New Amsterdam, Wouter van Twiller, “claimed” a huge area of land in and around today=s Greenwich Village for his personal plantation, Bossen Bouwerie, where he cultivated tobacco. Starting in the 1640s, freed African slaves were granted and farmed parcels of land near current-day Washington Square, Minetta Lane, and Thompson Street, establishing the nucleus of a community of African-Americans that remained in this location until the Civil War.
Under British rule during the 18th century, the area of Greenwich Village was the location of the small rural hamlet of Greenwich, as well as the country seats and summer homes of wealthy downtown aristocrats, merchants, and capitalists. The vicinity of the Far West Village was amassed during the 1740s by Sir Peter Warren as part of a vast tract of land along the North (Hudson) River. An admiral in the British Navy, Warren earned a fortune in war prize money and had extensive land holdings throughout the New York region. As historian Jill Lepore suggests based on a review of documents at The New-York Historical Society, “Warren appears to have owned a sizable number of slaves.”2 Warren’s three daughters, who resided in England, inherited the property after his death in 1752 and slowly sold off portions. In 1788, Richard Amos, one of Warren’s trustees, acquired the portion of the estate north of today’s Christopher Street, between Hudson and Washington Streets.
The land west of this tract was acquired by 1794 by Abijah Hammond, another Warren trustees and also owner of holdings to the southeast. According to the New York Census (1790 to 1810), Hammond owned several slaves, while Amos had none.
New York State=s first prison, the 4-acre “State Prison at Greenwich,” or Newgate State Prison, was constructed in 1796-97, with grounds extending between today=s Christopher, Perry, and Washington Streets and the North (Hudson) River shoreline. The land was transferred from Hammond. Newgate=s massive buildings, surrounded by high stone walls, were designed by Joseph-Francois Mangin, later the architect of City Hall (1802-11, with John McComb, Jr.) and (old) St. Patrick=s Cathedral (1809-15) on Mott Street.3 Prisoners were transferred here from the old Bridewell jail in City Hall Park. “A more pleasant, airy, and salubrious spot could not have been selected in the vicinity of New York,”4 stated an observer in 1801, and the prison, as one of the area’s most imposing structures, became one of Greenwich’s first tourist attractions. Ferry service was established from the prison=s dock to Hoboken in 1799.
The Greenwich Hotel, opened in 1809 near the prison, became a popular summer hostelry and daily stage service was begun from the hotel to lower Manhattan in 1811. A number of cholera and yellow fever epidemics in lower Manhattan between 1799 and 1822 led to an influx of settlers in the Greenwich area, with the population quadrupling between 1825 and 1840. Previously undeveloped tracts of land were speculatively subdivided for the construction of town houses and rowhouses. By the 1820s and 30s, as commercial development and congestion increasingly disrupted and displaced New Yorkers living near City Hall Park, the elite moved northward into Greenwich Village, particularly the area east of Sixth Avenue. Throughout the 19th century, Greenwich Village developed as a primarily residential precinct, with the usual accompanying institutions and commercial activities.
The far western section of Greenwich Village developed with mixed uses, including residences for the middle and professional classes, industry, and transportation- and maritime-related commerce.
Street improvements were made in the vicinity. Amos (later West 10th), Perry, and Charles Streets were surveyed in 1796 and, extending westerly only to the prison grounds, deeded to the City in 1809 by Richard Amos. Christopher Street had been the northern boundary of the Trinity Church Farm, granted to the church by the Crown of England in 1708; it was laid out prior to 1799, opened as a street in 1817, and paved in 1825. Hammond (later West 11th) Street was laid out by 1799 leading to a wharf on the river. Amos subdivided his land into lots by 1817, as did Hammond in 1827. South of the prison, landfill extended the shoreline westward, and West Street was laid out by 1824. In 1828, a pier was opened at the end of Christopher Street that became a transfer depot for lumber and building materials. In 1826, the City of New York acquired from the State the Newgate prison, and prisoners were moved to Sing Sing Prison in 1828-29.
The City plotted and sold the prison land in 1829, reserving the blockfront along West Street between Christopher and Amos Streets for a public market. Jacob Lorillard purchased the prison buildings, which he converted into a sanitorium spa in 1831. Around the same time, the former farms located along Christopher Street were plotted and readied for development.
A public Greenwich Market had existed since 1813 on the south side of Christopher Street between Greenwich and Washington Streets, on land formerly owned by Trinity Church. The market house was enlarged in 1819 and 1828, and the streetbed of Christopher Street was widened west of Greenwich Street to accommodate the market business and wagon traffic. Market business here was negatively affected by the 1833 opening of the Jefferson Market at Greenwich Lane (later Avenue) and Sixth Avenue, and the Greenwich Market was closed in 1835. The new market, also officially called the Greenwich Market but known as the “Weehawken Market” to differentiate it from the old market one block away on Christopher Street, was constructed in 1834, but only operated until 1844.
Examples of the earliest surviving residential buildings located in the far western section of Greenwich Village, all rowhouses, include: the rare, vernacular wood-framed No. 132 Charles Street (c. 1819), attributed to carpenter Matthew Armstrong, a co-owner/occupant who was active in neighborhood development, and extended one story c. 1853, attributed to carpenters/owner-occupants John and Levi Springsteen; Nos. 651, 653 and 655 Washington Street (1829), 3-1/2-story, brick-clad Federal style houses owned by merchant Samuel Norsworthy; No. 398 West Street (1830-31), a 3-1/2-story, brick-clad Federal style house built for flour merchant Isaac Amerman; No. 7 Weehawken Street (c. 1830-31), a 3-story, brick-clad rowhouse/stable owned by carpenter Jacob P. Roome; No. 131 Charles Street (1834), an intact, relatively rare and late example of a 2-1/2-story, brick-clad Federal style house, owned by stone cutter David Christie and a designated New York City Landmark since 1966; No. 269 West 10th Street (c. 1835), a Greek Revival style (now altered) house for widow Hannah Jenkins; and No. 159 Charles Street (c. 1838), a brick-clad Greek Revival style house built for merchant Henry J. Wyckoff and today a designated New York City Landmark.
Three activities helped to spur commercial activity in the vicinity. Ferry service to Hoboken was reinstituted by 1841 at the foot of Christopher Street (earlier service, after 1799, was from the prison dock). Around 1845, part of the Newgate prison site was adapted for use as a brewery by Nash, Beadleston & Co. (later Beadleston & Woerz). In 1846, the Hudson River Railroad was incorporated, and was constructed along West Street, terminating in a station at Chambers Street in 1851 (this was replaced by the St. John’s Park Terminal for freight in 1868).
Construction and 19th-Century Ownership and Residency of No. 354 West 11th Street
This block, formerly part of the Greenwich Village land holdings of Abijah Hammond (the western, underwater portion of which he acquired in 1821), was extended by landfill and later plotted and sold by Hammond in 1827. This lot was acquired by cartman/milkman Jonathan Lounsberry and his wife, Charlotte, who built a house here c. 1828. The address was originally No. 144 Hammond Street (the name was officially changed to West 11th Street by the City Council in 1865).7 The house was sold in 1830 to Charles Gilmore, a New Jersey resident, and his wife, Elizabeth, and in 1832 to James Agnew, a lawyer who lived here. In 1838, however, a fire in the Baurmeister & Scheplin soap factory located in the rear of No. 160 Hammond Street destroyed much of the block, including some 50 buildings.8 The 1841 tax assessments listed Agnew’s lot (with no building) at $1600.
That year, Agnew was foreclosed, and the property was briefly owned by John Westervelt, Jr., a coal merchant. It was purchased in October 1841 for $2250 by William B. Fash, a carver and “composition ornament” manufacturer (at 192 Varick Street), and his wife, Frances. The 1842 tax assessments listed Fash’s “house and lot” at $2500, with the annotation “unfinished.” (City directories in 1842-43 indicate that Fash was living at No. 752 Greenwich. The 1843 tax assessment for the 144 Hammond Street property is missing). In April 1843, a foreclosure action against Fash was concluded by George O. Post and Edward Mitchell, guardians of George Edward Post, and the Greek Revival style rowhouse was placed at auction. The highest bidder ($3325) was attorney Edwin L.B. Brooks and his wife, Catherine M., then residents of No. 47 Bank Street. The 1844 assessment of this property was $4000.
The Brookses never resided at No. 144 Hammond Street, but leased it. The earliest known tenants were Eliza Scott (1849-50), the widow of Charles T. Scott, a drygoods merchant living at No. 7 Hammond Street in 184849; drygoods merchant Willet Hawkins and his wife, Sarah (1849-52); and typemaker C. Joepfer (1851). After Brooks’ death, the house was sold in 1852 to undertaker Peter Relyea and his wife, Margaretta (it was briefly held in 1853 by Asa W. Roath, ice merchant, and his wife, Hanna Maria, but reverted to the Relyeas). In 1854, Relyea advertised: “ROOMS TO LET: On the first floor of house No. 144 Hammond-st... N.Y.. consisting of two parlors, two bed-rooms, and cook kitchen in the rear. Inquire of PETER RELYEA on the premises.”9 The house was acquired that year by Joshua and Mary Stafford Read.
Read (1783-1865), a prosperous farmer/businessman and a resident of Palatine Bridge, N.Y., was the uncle of Susan Brownell Anthony (1820-1906), the future women’s rights advocate – the brother of her mother, Lucy Read Anthony, he had significantly assisted the Anthony family when it was ruined financially in the Panic of 1837. In 1859, Read transferred this property to his daughter, Eleanor J. Read Caldwell, wife of merchant George Caldwell (Eleanor J. Caldwell had been listed in the tax assessments here as early as 1854), who retained it until 1866.
The Read/Caldwell family never lived here, but rented the house in 1856-62 to clerk David S. Lockwood (1825-1891), who had married Eleanor C. Griswold in 1856.
In 1866, the house (now No. 354 West 11th Street) was purchased by Friedrich (Frederick) C. Knubel (18271908), a German-born grocer who had immigrated in 1855, and his wife, Katherine (Anna) Knubel Knubel. The Knubels were the first long-term owners of the property. Formerly residents of Nos. 163 and 145 Hammond Street (his business was at No. 137 Hammond), the Knubels lived in No. 354 in 1870-75 and in 1871 extended the house about 11 feet in the rear. It is likely the pressed metal, denticulated, modillioned, and bracketed cornice on the front facade dates from their ownership. Their son, Frederick Hermann Knubel (1870-1945), born the year they moved into the house, went on to study for the ministry and became the first president of the United Lutheran Church in America (1918-45). After the senior Frederick Knubel’s death in 1908, the property was transferred in 1909 to his daughter, Henrietta M. Knubel Wilshusen (c. 1861-1929), the wife of John Wilshusen (died 1915), who retained it until 1923.
Greek Revival Style Rowhouses in Manhattan
As the city of New York grew in the period after the Revolution, large plots of land in Manhattan were sold and subdivided for the construction of groups of brick-clad houses. Their architectural style has been called “Federal” after the new republic, but in form and detail they continued the Georgian style of Great Britain. Federal style houses were constructed from the Battery as far north as 23rd Street between the 1790s and 1830s. The size of the lot dictated the size of the house: typically each house lot was 20 or 25 feet wide by 90 to 100 feet deep, which accorded with the rectilinear plan of New York City, adopted as the Commissioners’ Plan in 1811. The rowhouse itself would be as wide as the lot, and 35 to 40 feet deep. This allowed for a stoop and small front yard, or areaway, and a fairly spacious rear yard. During the early 19th century, several houses were often constructed together, sharing common party walls, chimneys, and roof timbering to form a continuous group.
The houses, of load-bearing masonry or modified timber-frame construction, had brick-clad front facades. With the increasing availability of pattern books, such as Asher Benjamin’s American Builders Companion (published in six editions between 1806 and 1827), local builders had access to drawings and instructions for exterior and interior plans and details. Federal style rowhouses usually had a 3-bay facade with two full stories over a high basement and an additional half story under a peaked roof with the ridge line running parallel to the front facade. The front facade was usually clad in red brick laid in the Flemish bond pattern, with stone trim, commonly brownstone. The planar quality of the facades was relieved by ornament in the form of lintels, entrances, stoops and areaways with iron railings, cornices, and dormers. The most ornamental feature was the doorway, often framed with columns and sidelights and topped with a rectangular transom or fanlight, and having a wooden paneled door.
The wood-framed sash were double hung and multi-light (typically six-over-six). A wooden cornice with a molded fascia extended across the front along the eave. Pedimented or segmental dormers on the front roof slope usually had decorative wood trim.
Around 1830, builders in New York City began to incorporate some Greek Revival style features on grander Federal style houses, such as the Seabury Tredwell (“Old Merchant’s”) House (1831-32), 29 East 4th Street. During the early 1830s, fashionable rowhouses were constructed in a Greek Revival style that was distinct from the earlier Federal style houses. Local builders were influenced by the designs and builder’s guides of architects such as Asher Benjamin, Minard Lafever, and Alexander Jackson Davis. Some examples were “high style,” such as the nine marble-fronted houses with a continuous Corinthian colonnade known as LaGrange Terrace or Colonnade Row (1832-33, attributed to Seth Greer), of which Nos. 428-434 Lafayette Street survive. Many rows of speculatively-built Greek Revival style houses were constructed, particularly in the Greenwich Village and Chelsea neighborhoods, during the period of enormous growth and development in New York City during the 1830s-40s.
Greek Revival style rowhouses, which became widely popular, basically continued many of the traditions of Federal style houses, including 3-bay front facades, brick cladding with brownstone trim, and raised stoops and areaways with iron railings. They differed, however, in stylistic details and in scale, being taller and somewhat grander at a full three stories above a basement (with higher ceilings per story). By this period, technological advances in brickmaking allowed for higher quality, machine-pressed brick. The brick was laid in a bond other than Flemish, such as stretcher bond. Ornamentation was spare, including simple, molded rectangular lintels and a flat roofline capped by a denticulated and molded wooden cornice (sometimes with attic windows). Like on Federal style houses, the most ornamental feature was the doorway.
The Greek Revival style doorway was recessed, with a rectangular transom, sidelights, and paneled (often a single vertical panel) door. On grander houses, the entrance featured a portico with Doric or Ionic columns flanking the doorway and supporting a prominent entablature. Examples of this type include “The Row” (1832-33), 1-13 Washington Square North, and the Samuel Tredwell Skidmore House (1845), 37 East 4th Street. More commonly, the entrance featured a brownstone surround with wide pilasters supporting an entablature. No. 354 West 11th Street is of this latter type. The wood-framed sash were double hung and typically six-over-six (often nine-over-nine or six-over-nine on the parlor level).
Late-19th and 20th Century History of the Far West Village
New York City had developed as the largest port in the United States by the early 19th century, and in the early 20th century emerged as one of the busiest ports in the world. In Manhattan, South Street along the East River had been the primary artery for maritime commerce, but West Street became a competitor in the 1870s and supplanted the former by about 1890. After the Civil War, New York also flourished as the commercial and financial center of the country. The continued mixed-use character of the Far West Village is evidenced by industries located on the southern side of the block behind No. 354 West 11th Street – an 1879 map shows an iron foundry here, while an 1885 map indicates a coalyard. To the west, there was a boat basin on the Hudson River.12
At the turn of the century, the New York Times and New York Police Department considered the section of the Hudson River waterfront along the piers between Houston and West 14th Streets particularly unsavory. A 1902 newspaper article stated that “for years, especially in fine weather, it has at night been the resort of outcasts, drunkards, dissolute people, and a dangerous class of depredators and petty highwaymen...” 13 A major public undertaking that had a profound impact on this section of the waterfront was the construction, by the New York City Department of Docks, of the Gansevoort Piers (1894-1902) and Chelsea Piers (1902-10, with Warren & Wetmore), between West 11th and West 23rd Streets. These long docks accommodated the enormous trans-Atlantic steamships of the “United States, Grace, Cunard White Star, Panama Pacific, and American Merchant” lines.
This area was described in 1914 as “in the heart of the busiest section of the port, adjacent to the transatlantic liners, coast and gulf vessels, between Christopher and 23rd Streets, surrounded by 5,000 seamen of all nationalities” of the half a million seamen that came into the harbor each year.
After a period of decline, Greenwich Village was becoming known, prior to World War I, for its historic and picturesque qualities, its affordable housing, and the diversity of its population and social and political ideas. Many artists and writers, as well as tourists, were attracted to the Village. At the same time, as observed by museum curator Jan S. Ramirez,
As early as 1914 a committee of Village property owners, merchants, social workers, and realtors had embarked on a campaign to combat the scruffy image the local bohemian populace had created for the community. ... Under the banner of the Greenwich Village Improvement Society and the Greenwich Village Rebuilding Corporation, this alliance of residents and businesses also rallied to arrest the district=s physical deterioration... their ultimate purpose was to reinstate higher-income-level families and young professionals in the Village to stimulate its economy. Shrewd realtors began to amass their holdings of dilapidated housing. 16
These various factors and the increased desirability of the Village led to a real estate boom – “rents increased during the 1920s by 140 percent and in some cases by as much as 300 percent”.17 The desirability of the far western section of Greenwich Village as a residential community by the late 1920s is exemplified by the conversion of multiple dwellings and other building types into middleclass apartments.
The completion of the Holland Tunnel (1919-27) and, especially, the elevated Miller Highway (1929-31) above West Street, while providing easier access between the Hudson River waterfront and the metropolitan region, had a number of effects on real estate values and on the uses of buildings, particularly along West Street. The Federal Writers’ Project’s New York City Guide (1939) described this stretch of the waterfront along West Street, the “most lucrative water-front property in the world,” as follows:
Although the western rim of Manhattan is but a small section of New Yorks far-flung port, along it is concentrated the largest aggregate of marine enterprises in the world. Glaciers of freight and cargo move across this strip of ... water front. It is the domain of the super-liner, but it is shared by the freighter, the river boat, the ferry, and the soot-faced tug... Ships and shipping are not visible along much of West Street. South of Twenty-third Street, the river is walled by an almost unbroken line of bulkhead sheds and dock structures... Opposite the piers, along the entire length of the highway, nearly every block houses its quota of cheap lunchrooms, tawdry saloons and waterfront haberdasheries catering to the thousands of polyglot seamen who haunt the “front.” Men “on the beach” (out of employment) usually make their headquarters in barrooms, which are frequented mainly by employees of lines leasing piers in their vicinity.
In 1961, Mayor Robert Wagner announced an urban renewal plan for the far western section of Greenwich Village that would have included the 12 blocks bounded by West, Christopher, Hudson, and West 11th Streets, and another 2 blocks along West Street south of Christopher Street. As reported in the Times in March 1961, residents of the site immediately rallied in vigorous protest. Their spokesman [sic] was Mrs. Jane Jacobs, an editor of Architectural Forum magazine, who lives with her family in a house they own at 555 Hudson Street. The entire site, the group said, contains only a negligible amount of blight. It would be unconscionable, they argued, to demolish any of their well-maintained homes to make way for a bleak, architecturally sterile, institutional housing development.
The Housing and Redevelopment Board responded that its intention was actually to “remove the industrial buildings, warehouses and trucking depots that threaten the neighborhood.”19 That same year, Jane Jacobs authored the influential The Death and Life of Great American Cities. The urban renewal plan for this area was never to proceed as initially envisioned by the City. Jacobs, on behalf of the West Village Committee, wrote to the newly formed New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission in 1963 (prior to the passage of the Landmarks Law in 1965 which enabled designations), urging that any consideration of a Greenwich Village historic district include the far western section of the Village to West Street.
After 1960, with the introduction of containerized shipping and the accompanying need for large facilities (space for which could be accommodated in Brooklyn and New Jersey), the Manhattan waterfront rapidly declined as the center of New York’s maritime commerce. In addition, airplanes replaced ocean liners carrying passengers overseas. Most of the piers and many of the buildings associated with Manhattan’s Hudson River maritime history have been demolished.
In 1974, the Miller Elevated Highway was closed, and it was subsequently demolished in the 1980s. The buildings along West Street, formerly in the permanent shadow of the highway, were exposed again. A New York Times writer in 1986 still disparaged the character of West Street as “a gritty mixture of auto garages, shuttered sex clubs, truckers’ coffee shops and a flurry of construction.”21 Buildings along West Street had begun to be redeveloped and demolished – as early as 1968-69, the Bell Telephone Laboratories, at West and Bank-Bethune Streets, had been converted into Westbeth, a residential complex for artists. Farther north, the Manhattan Refrigerating Co. complex, West Street and Horatio-Gansevoort Streets, was renovated and converted as the West Coast Apartments and opened in the 1980s (the complex today is located within the Gansevoort Market Historic District).
By 1999, the Times observed the Far West Village’s “developers’ gold rush” to convert structures and construct new high rises along the West Street corridor.22 The relatively rare surviving individual rowhouses in the area, such as No. 354 West 11th Street, were also restored for use as single-family homes.
Later History of No. 354 West 11th Street
In 1923, Henrietta M. Knubel Wilshusen sold No. 354 West 11th Street to fireman Anthony Udovicich, and his wife, nee Elena Possidel; they were listed in 1930s city directories living at No. 354. The next owners were Josefa Muino (1946-61), who resided here for a time, and John and Sidney Wasserman (1961-63). Beginning in the late 1950s, directories listed multiple occupants of the house. In 1963-65, the owner/occupant was John F. Mehegan (1916-1984), a noted jazz pianist, recording artist, teacher (including Juilliard, 1947-64), and author of numerous books, including the widely used 4-volume work Jazz Improvisation. Mehegan had been the composer of the musical score for Tennessee Williams’ Broadway play “A Streetcar Named Desire” (1947), which he played offstage during its initial run. No. 354 was briefly owned (1965-67) by Sophie G. Griscom, a Maine resident.
The building was transferred in 1967 to the 354 West Eleventh Street Corp. (Lester Fiske); Fiske resided here c. 1975-86. In 1988, it was sold to Neil and Susan Selkirk. A London-born photographer, Neil Selkirk has specialized in portraits and advertising and corporate work, which has been widely published in magazines, and has been an instructor at Parsons School of Design. He has been the sole person authorized to print the work of photographer Diane Arbus since her death in 1971.
Today, No. 354 West 11th Street is a relatively rare surviving residential building of the early period of development of the far western section of Greenwich Village, and is one of the best extant examples of the Greek Revival style rowhouses of the 1830s-40s located in the Hudson River waterfront section of Manhattan, specifically the area west of the Greenwich Village Historic District between West 14th Street and Lower Manhattan.
Description
This 3-story (plus basement) Greek Revival style rowhouse is clad in machine-pressed red brick laid in stretcher bond above a (painted) rusticated brownstone base. The areaway, bordered by stone with historic wrought-iron railings and gate, has steps and concrete and bluestone paving. The basement level has two windows with non-historic iron grilles, and an entrance under the stoop with a non-historic iron gate and a wood-and-glass entrance door. The high (painted) stone stoop has historic wrought-iron railings with curved newel-posts. The main entrance has a (painted) brownstone surround with pilasters supporting a denticulated entablature, and a recessed doorway with pilasters, sidelights, a triple-light transom, and a paneled wooden door. Sconces are placed on the reveals.
Windows have molded brownstone lintels and plain sills, recede in size from the first- to third-story levels, and have six-over-six double-hung wood sash (six-over-nine on the first-story level) (installed c. post-1980; previously, twoover-two double-hung wood sash). Planters are set on metal brackets below the first-story windows. One through-the-wall air conditioner is located below the center window of the second story. The facade is terminated by a c. 1870s pressed metal, denticulated and modillioned cornice (four brackets were removed prior to c. 1980).
- From the 2007 NYCLPC Landmark Designation Report
Could not resist going for the 57 again this morning as the fog was lifting quickly, Network Rail 57 306 on the final few yards of its journey from Seaforth to Ironbridge with containerized biomass 4G01
Guemes Channel. Dakota Creek Industries.
Coastal Standard carries palletized frozen product below decks with space for containerized or breakbulk cargo topside. Moving cargo on and off the ship is done by the sideport loading system built by TTS of Bergen, Norway.
Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick Kennedy delivers remarks at the unveiling of the completion of two Containerized Biocontainment System units at Dobbins Air Reserve Base in Marietta, Georgia, on August 11, 2015. The units will be instrumental in expanding and expediting medevac capabilities for healthcare workers on the frontlines fighting Ebola. [State Department photo/ Public Domain]
Curtis Wharf. Guemes Channel.
Built in Anacortes, Washington by Dakota Creek Industries, delivered to Coastal Transportation In Feb. 2016.
Coastal Standard carries palletized frozen product below decks with space for containerized or breakbulk cargo topside. Moving cargo on and off the ship is done by the sideport loading system built by TTS of Bergen, Norway.
Almost everything you have in your home spent time at some stage in shipping container. Zeebrugge counts as one of the most important ports in Europe for containerized cargo, handling over 2.5 million TEUs (containers) in 2010.
Can’t help wondering about the effect on trade because of Brexit. Places like Zeebrugge could be hard hit. What do you think?
Follow me on Instagram: www.instagram.com/paul.indigo
Greenwich Village, Manhattan
No. 354 West 11th Street is a relatively rare surviving residential building of the early period of the mixed-use development that came to characterize the far western section of Greenwich Village, which was built up with residences for the middle and professional classes, industry, and transportation-and maritime-related commerce. It is also one of the best extant examples of the Greek Revival style rowhouses of the 1830s-40s located in the Hudson River waterfront section of Manhattan, specifically the area west of the Greenwich Village Historic District between West 14th Street and Lower Manhattan. The Greek Revival style characteristics of the house are its 3story height; machine-pressed red brickwork laid in stretcher bond; stoop and areaway with wrought-ironwork; entrance with pilasters, entablature, sidelights, and transom; molded brownstone lintels; and flat roofline.
The building was constructed c.1841-42, apparently for William B. Fash, a carver and “composition ornament” manufacturer, and his wife, Frances, who were foreclosed in 1843. It was next owned, until 1852, by attorney Edwin L.B. Brooks and his wife, Catherine. They never resided here, but leased it to merchant-class tenants, as did subsequent owners. The first long-term owners of the property, from 1866 to 1923, were the family of Friedrich C. Knubel, a German-born grocer. The Knubels lived in No. 354 in 1870-75, and in 1871 extended the house in the rear; it is likely the pressed metal cornice on the front facade dates from this period. A son, Frederick Hermann Knubel, born the year they moved into the house, went on to study for the ministry and became the first president of the United Lutheran Church in America (1918-45). In the 20th and 21st centuries, the building has housed single-family and multiple residents.
DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS
The Development of the Far West Village
In the early 17th century, the area now known as the Far West Village was a Lenape encampment for fishing and planting known as Sapokanican, identified through archeology and historical documents at the foot of Gansevoort Street. During Dutch rule, the second director general (1633-37) of New Amsterdam, Wouter van Twiller, “claimed” a huge area of land in and around today=s Greenwich Village for his personal plantation, Bossen Bouwerie, where he cultivated tobacco. Starting in the 1640s, freed African slaves were granted and farmed parcels of land near current-day Washington Square, Minetta Lane, and Thompson Street, establishing the nucleus of a community of African-Americans that remained in this location until the Civil War.
Under British rule during the 18th century, the area of Greenwich Village was the location of the small rural hamlet of Greenwich, as well as the country seats and summer homes of wealthy downtown aristocrats, merchants, and capitalists. The vicinity of the Far West Village was amassed during the 1740s by Sir Peter Warren as part of a vast tract of land along the North (Hudson) River. An admiral in the British Navy, Warren earned a fortune in war prize money and had extensive land holdings throughout the New York region. As historian Jill Lepore suggests based on a review of documents at The New-York Historical Society, “Warren appears to have owned a sizable number of slaves.”2 Warren’s three daughters, who resided in England, inherited the property after his death in 1752 and slowly sold off portions. In 1788, Richard Amos, one of Warren’s trustees, acquired the portion of the estate north of today’s Christopher Street, between Hudson and Washington Streets.
The land west of this tract was acquired by 1794 by Abijah Hammond, another Warren trustees and also owner of holdings to the southeast. According to the New York Census (1790 to 1810), Hammond owned several slaves, while Amos had none.
New York State=s first prison, the 4-acre “State Prison at Greenwich,” or Newgate State Prison, was constructed in 1796-97, with grounds extending between today=s Christopher, Perry, and Washington Streets and the North (Hudson) River shoreline. The land was transferred from Hammond. Newgate=s massive buildings, surrounded by high stone walls, were designed by Joseph-Francois Mangin, later the architect of City Hall (1802-11, with John McComb, Jr.) and (old) St. Patrick=s Cathedral (1809-15) on Mott Street.3 Prisoners were transferred here from the old Bridewell jail in City Hall Park. “A more pleasant, airy, and salubrious spot could not have been selected in the vicinity of New York,”4 stated an observer in 1801, and the prison, as one of the area’s most imposing structures, became one of Greenwich’s first tourist attractions. Ferry service was established from the prison=s dock to Hoboken in 1799.
The Greenwich Hotel, opened in 1809 near the prison, became a popular summer hostelry and daily stage service was begun from the hotel to lower Manhattan in 1811. A number of cholera and yellow fever epidemics in lower Manhattan between 1799 and 1822 led to an influx of settlers in the Greenwich area, with the population quadrupling between 1825 and 1840. Previously undeveloped tracts of land were speculatively subdivided for the construction of town houses and rowhouses. By the 1820s and 30s, as commercial development and congestion increasingly disrupted and displaced New Yorkers living near City Hall Park, the elite moved northward into Greenwich Village, particularly the area east of Sixth Avenue. Throughout the 19th century, Greenwich Village developed as a primarily residential precinct, with the usual accompanying institutions and commercial activities.
The far western section of Greenwich Village developed with mixed uses, including residences for the middle and professional classes, industry, and transportation- and maritime-related commerce.
Street improvements were made in the vicinity. Amos (later West 10th), Perry, and Charles Streets were surveyed in 1796 and, extending westerly only to the prison grounds, deeded to the City in 1809 by Richard Amos. Christopher Street had been the northern boundary of the Trinity Church Farm, granted to the church by the Crown of England in 1708; it was laid out prior to 1799, opened as a street in 1817, and paved in 1825. Hammond (later West 11th) Street was laid out by 1799 leading to a wharf on the river. Amos subdivided his land into lots by 1817, as did Hammond in 1827. South of the prison, landfill extended the shoreline westward, and West Street was laid out by 1824. In 1828, a pier was opened at the end of Christopher Street that became a transfer depot for lumber and building materials. In 1826, the City of New York acquired from the State the Newgate prison, and prisoners were moved to Sing Sing Prison in 1828-29.
The City plotted and sold the prison land in 1829, reserving the blockfront along West Street between Christopher and Amos Streets for a public market. Jacob Lorillard purchased the prison buildings, which he converted into a sanitorium spa in 1831. Around the same time, the former farms located along Christopher Street were plotted and readied for development.
A public Greenwich Market had existed since 1813 on the south side of Christopher Street between Greenwich and Washington Streets, on land formerly owned by Trinity Church. The market house was enlarged in 1819 and 1828, and the streetbed of Christopher Street was widened west of Greenwich Street to accommodate the market business and wagon traffic. Market business here was negatively affected by the 1833 opening of the Jefferson Market at Greenwich Lane (later Avenue) and Sixth Avenue, and the Greenwich Market was closed in 1835. The new market, also officially called the Greenwich Market but known as the “Weehawken Market” to differentiate it from the old market one block away on Christopher Street, was constructed in 1834, but only operated until 1844.
Examples of the earliest surviving residential buildings located in the far western section of Greenwich Village, all rowhouses, include: the rare, vernacular wood-framed No. 132 Charles Street (c. 1819), attributed to carpenter Matthew Armstrong, a co-owner/occupant who was active in neighborhood development, and extended one story c. 1853, attributed to carpenters/owner-occupants John and Levi Springsteen; Nos. 651, 653 and 655 Washington Street (1829), 3-1/2-story, brick-clad Federal style houses owned by merchant Samuel Norsworthy; No. 398 West Street (1830-31), a 3-1/2-story, brick-clad Federal style house built for flour merchant Isaac Amerman; No. 7 Weehawken Street (c. 1830-31), a 3-story, brick-clad rowhouse/stable owned by carpenter Jacob P. Roome; No. 131 Charles Street (1834), an intact, relatively rare and late example of a 2-1/2-story, brick-clad Federal style house, owned by stone cutter David Christie and a designated New York City Landmark since 1966; No. 269 West 10th Street (c. 1835), a Greek Revival style (now altered) house for widow Hannah Jenkins; and No. 159 Charles Street (c. 1838), a brick-clad Greek Revival style house built for merchant Henry J. Wyckoff and today a designated New York City Landmark.
Three activities helped to spur commercial activity in the vicinity. Ferry service to Hoboken was reinstituted by 1841 at the foot of Christopher Street (earlier service, after 1799, was from the prison dock). Around 1845, part of the Newgate prison site was adapted for use as a brewery by Nash, Beadleston & Co. (later Beadleston & Woerz). In 1846, the Hudson River Railroad was incorporated, and was constructed along West Street, terminating in a station at Chambers Street in 1851 (this was replaced by the St. John’s Park Terminal for freight in 1868).
Construction and 19th-Century Ownership and Residency of No. 354 West 11th Street
This block, formerly part of the Greenwich Village land holdings of Abijah Hammond (the western, underwater portion of which he acquired in 1821), was extended by landfill and later plotted and sold by Hammond in 1827. This lot was acquired by cartman/milkman Jonathan Lounsberry and his wife, Charlotte, who built a house here c. 1828. The address was originally No. 144 Hammond Street (the name was officially changed to West 11th Street by the City Council in 1865).7 The house was sold in 1830 to Charles Gilmore, a New Jersey resident, and his wife, Elizabeth, and in 1832 to James Agnew, a lawyer who lived here. In 1838, however, a fire in the Baurmeister & Scheplin soap factory located in the rear of No. 160 Hammond Street destroyed much of the block, including some 50 buildings.8 The 1841 tax assessments listed Agnew’s lot (with no building) at $1600.
That year, Agnew was foreclosed, and the property was briefly owned by John Westervelt, Jr., a coal merchant. It was purchased in October 1841 for $2250 by William B. Fash, a carver and “composition ornament” manufacturer (at 192 Varick Street), and his wife, Frances. The 1842 tax assessments listed Fash’s “house and lot” at $2500, with the annotation “unfinished.” (City directories in 1842-43 indicate that Fash was living at No. 752 Greenwich. The 1843 tax assessment for the 144 Hammond Street property is missing). In April 1843, a foreclosure action against Fash was concluded by George O. Post and Edward Mitchell, guardians of George Edward Post, and the Greek Revival style rowhouse was placed at auction. The highest bidder ($3325) was attorney Edwin L.B. Brooks and his wife, Catherine M., then residents of No. 47 Bank Street. The 1844 assessment of this property was $4000.
The Brookses never resided at No. 144 Hammond Street, but leased it. The earliest known tenants were Eliza Scott (1849-50), the widow of Charles T. Scott, a drygoods merchant living at No. 7 Hammond Street in 184849; drygoods merchant Willet Hawkins and his wife, Sarah (1849-52); and typemaker C. Joepfer (1851). After Brooks’ death, the house was sold in 1852 to undertaker Peter Relyea and his wife, Margaretta (it was briefly held in 1853 by Asa W. Roath, ice merchant, and his wife, Hanna Maria, but reverted to the Relyeas). In 1854, Relyea advertised: “ROOMS TO LET: On the first floor of house No. 144 Hammond-st... N.Y.. consisting of two parlors, two bed-rooms, and cook kitchen in the rear. Inquire of PETER RELYEA on the premises.”9 The house was acquired that year by Joshua and Mary Stafford Read.
Read (1783-1865), a prosperous farmer/businessman and a resident of Palatine Bridge, N.Y., was the uncle of Susan Brownell Anthony (1820-1906), the future women’s rights advocate – the brother of her mother, Lucy Read Anthony, he had significantly assisted the Anthony family when it was ruined financially in the Panic of 1837. In 1859, Read transferred this property to his daughter, Eleanor J. Read Caldwell, wife of merchant George Caldwell (Eleanor J. Caldwell had been listed in the tax assessments here as early as 1854), who retained it until 1866.
The Read/Caldwell family never lived here, but rented the house in 1856-62 to clerk David S. Lockwood (1825-1891), who had married Eleanor C. Griswold in 1856.
In 1866, the house (now No. 354 West 11th Street) was purchased by Friedrich (Frederick) C. Knubel (18271908), a German-born grocer who had immigrated in 1855, and his wife, Katherine (Anna) Knubel Knubel. The Knubels were the first long-term owners of the property. Formerly residents of Nos. 163 and 145 Hammond Street (his business was at No. 137 Hammond), the Knubels lived in No. 354 in 1870-75 and in 1871 extended the house about 11 feet in the rear. It is likely the pressed metal, denticulated, modillioned, and bracketed cornice on the front facade dates from their ownership. Their son, Frederick Hermann Knubel (1870-1945), born the year they moved into the house, went on to study for the ministry and became the first president of the United Lutheran Church in America (1918-45). After the senior Frederick Knubel’s death in 1908, the property was transferred in 1909 to his daughter, Henrietta M. Knubel Wilshusen (c. 1861-1929), the wife of John Wilshusen (died 1915), who retained it until 1923.
Greek Revival Style Rowhouses in Manhattan
As the city of New York grew in the period after the Revolution, large plots of land in Manhattan were sold and subdivided for the construction of groups of brick-clad houses. Their architectural style has been called “Federal” after the new republic, but in form and detail they continued the Georgian style of Great Britain. Federal style houses were constructed from the Battery as far north as 23rd Street between the 1790s and 1830s. The size of the lot dictated the size of the house: typically each house lot was 20 or 25 feet wide by 90 to 100 feet deep, which accorded with the rectilinear plan of New York City, adopted as the Commissioners’ Plan in 1811. The rowhouse itself would be as wide as the lot, and 35 to 40 feet deep. This allowed for a stoop and small front yard, or areaway, and a fairly spacious rear yard. During the early 19th century, several houses were often constructed together, sharing common party walls, chimneys, and roof timbering to form a continuous group.
The houses, of load-bearing masonry or modified timber-frame construction, had brick-clad front facades. With the increasing availability of pattern books, such as Asher Benjamin’s American Builders Companion (published in six editions between 1806 and 1827), local builders had access to drawings and instructions for exterior and interior plans and details. Federal style rowhouses usually had a 3-bay facade with two full stories over a high basement and an additional half story under a peaked roof with the ridge line running parallel to the front facade. The front facade was usually clad in red brick laid in the Flemish bond pattern, with stone trim, commonly brownstone. The planar quality of the facades was relieved by ornament in the form of lintels, entrances, stoops and areaways with iron railings, cornices, and dormers. The most ornamental feature was the doorway, often framed with columns and sidelights and topped with a rectangular transom or fanlight, and having a wooden paneled door.
The wood-framed sash were double hung and multi-light (typically six-over-six). A wooden cornice with a molded fascia extended across the front along the eave. Pedimented or segmental dormers on the front roof slope usually had decorative wood trim.
Around 1830, builders in New York City began to incorporate some Greek Revival style features on grander Federal style houses, such as the Seabury Tredwell (“Old Merchant’s”) House (1831-32), 29 East 4th Street. During the early 1830s, fashionable rowhouses were constructed in a Greek Revival style that was distinct from the earlier Federal style houses. Local builders were influenced by the designs and builder’s guides of architects such as Asher Benjamin, Minard Lafever, and Alexander Jackson Davis. Some examples were “high style,” such as the nine marble-fronted houses with a continuous Corinthian colonnade known as LaGrange Terrace or Colonnade Row (1832-33, attributed to Seth Greer), of which Nos. 428-434 Lafayette Street survive. Many rows of speculatively-built Greek Revival style houses were constructed, particularly in the Greenwich Village and Chelsea neighborhoods, during the period of enormous growth and development in New York City during the 1830s-40s.
Greek Revival style rowhouses, which became widely popular, basically continued many of the traditions of Federal style houses, including 3-bay front facades, brick cladding with brownstone trim, and raised stoops and areaways with iron railings. They differed, however, in stylistic details and in scale, being taller and somewhat grander at a full three stories above a basement (with higher ceilings per story). By this period, technological advances in brickmaking allowed for higher quality, machine-pressed brick. The brick was laid in a bond other than Flemish, such as stretcher bond. Ornamentation was spare, including simple, molded rectangular lintels and a flat roofline capped by a denticulated and molded wooden cornice (sometimes with attic windows). Like on Federal style houses, the most ornamental feature was the doorway.
The Greek Revival style doorway was recessed, with a rectangular transom, sidelights, and paneled (often a single vertical panel) door. On grander houses, the entrance featured a portico with Doric or Ionic columns flanking the doorway and supporting a prominent entablature. Examples of this type include “The Row” (1832-33), 1-13 Washington Square North, and the Samuel Tredwell Skidmore House (1845), 37 East 4th Street. More commonly, the entrance featured a brownstone surround with wide pilasters supporting an entablature. No. 354 West 11th Street is of this latter type. The wood-framed sash were double hung and typically six-over-six (often nine-over-nine or six-over-nine on the parlor level).
Late-19th and 20th Century History of the Far West Village
New York City had developed as the largest port in the United States by the early 19th century, and in the early 20th century emerged as one of the busiest ports in the world. In Manhattan, South Street along the East River had been the primary artery for maritime commerce, but West Street became a competitor in the 1870s and supplanted the former by about 1890. After the Civil War, New York also flourished as the commercial and financial center of the country. The continued mixed-use character of the Far West Village is evidenced by industries located on the southern side of the block behind No. 354 West 11th Street – an 1879 map shows an iron foundry here, while an 1885 map indicates a coalyard. To the west, there was a boat basin on the Hudson River.12
At the turn of the century, the New York Times and New York Police Department considered the section of the Hudson River waterfront along the piers between Houston and West 14th Streets particularly unsavory. A 1902 newspaper article stated that “for years, especially in fine weather, it has at night been the resort of outcasts, drunkards, dissolute people, and a dangerous class of depredators and petty highwaymen...” 13 A major public undertaking that had a profound impact on this section of the waterfront was the construction, by the New York City Department of Docks, of the Gansevoort Piers (1894-1902) and Chelsea Piers (1902-10, with Warren & Wetmore), between West 11th and West 23rd Streets. These long docks accommodated the enormous trans-Atlantic steamships of the “United States, Grace, Cunard White Star, Panama Pacific, and American Merchant” lines.
This area was described in 1914 as “in the heart of the busiest section of the port, adjacent to the transatlantic liners, coast and gulf vessels, between Christopher and 23rd Streets, surrounded by 5,000 seamen of all nationalities” of the half a million seamen that came into the harbor each year.
After a period of decline, Greenwich Village was becoming known, prior to World War I, for its historic and picturesque qualities, its affordable housing, and the diversity of its population and social and political ideas. Many artists and writers, as well as tourists, were attracted to the Village. At the same time, as observed by museum curator Jan S. Ramirez,
As early as 1914 a committee of Village property owners, merchants, social workers, and realtors had embarked on a campaign to combat the scruffy image the local bohemian populace had created for the community. ... Under the banner of the Greenwich Village Improvement Society and the Greenwich Village Rebuilding Corporation, this alliance of residents and businesses also rallied to arrest the district=s physical deterioration... their ultimate purpose was to reinstate higher-income-level families and young professionals in the Village to stimulate its economy. Shrewd realtors began to amass their holdings of dilapidated housing. 16
These various factors and the increased desirability of the Village led to a real estate boom – “rents increased during the 1920s by 140 percent and in some cases by as much as 300 percent”.17 The desirability of the far western section of Greenwich Village as a residential community by the late 1920s is exemplified by the conversion of multiple dwellings and other building types into middleclass apartments.
The completion of the Holland Tunnel (1919-27) and, especially, the elevated Miller Highway (1929-31) above West Street, while providing easier access between the Hudson River waterfront and the metropolitan region, had a number of effects on real estate values and on the uses of buildings, particularly along West Street. The Federal Writers’ Project’s New York City Guide (1939) described this stretch of the waterfront along West Street, the “most lucrative water-front property in the world,” as follows:
Although the western rim of Manhattan is but a small section of New Yorks far-flung port, along it is concentrated the largest aggregate of marine enterprises in the world. Glaciers of freight and cargo move across this strip of ... water front. It is the domain of the super-liner, but it is shared by the freighter, the river boat, the ferry, and the soot-faced tug... Ships and shipping are not visible along much of West Street. South of Twenty-third Street, the river is walled by an almost unbroken line of bulkhead sheds and dock structures... Opposite the piers, along the entire length of the highway, nearly every block houses its quota of cheap lunchrooms, tawdry saloons and waterfront haberdasheries catering to the thousands of polyglot seamen who haunt the “front.” Men “on the beach” (out of employment) usually make their headquarters in barrooms, which are frequented mainly by employees of lines leasing piers in their vicinity.
In 1961, Mayor Robert Wagner announced an urban renewal plan for the far western section of Greenwich Village that would have included the 12 blocks bounded by West, Christopher, Hudson, and West 11th Streets, and another 2 blocks along West Street south of Christopher Street. As reported in the Times in March 1961, residents of the site immediately rallied in vigorous protest. Their spokesman [sic] was Mrs. Jane Jacobs, an editor of Architectural Forum magazine, who lives with her family in a house they own at 555 Hudson Street. The entire site, the group said, contains only a negligible amount of blight. It would be unconscionable, they argued, to demolish any of their well-maintained homes to make way for a bleak, architecturally sterile, institutional housing development.
The Housing and Redevelopment Board responded that its intention was actually to “remove the industrial buildings, warehouses and trucking depots that threaten the neighborhood.”19 That same year, Jane Jacobs authored the influential The Death and Life of Great American Cities. The urban renewal plan for this area was never to proceed as initially envisioned by the City. Jacobs, on behalf of the West Village Committee, wrote to the newly formed New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission in 1963 (prior to the passage of the Landmarks Law in 1965 which enabled designations), urging that any consideration of a Greenwich Village historic district include the far western section of the Village to West Street.
After 1960, with the introduction of containerized shipping and the accompanying need for large facilities (space for which could be accommodated in Brooklyn and New Jersey), the Manhattan waterfront rapidly declined as the center of New York’s maritime commerce. In addition, airplanes replaced ocean liners carrying passengers overseas. Most of the piers and many of the buildings associated with Manhattan’s Hudson River maritime history have been demolished.
In 1974, the Miller Elevated Highway was closed, and it was subsequently demolished in the 1980s. The buildings along West Street, formerly in the permanent shadow of the highway, were exposed again. A New York Times writer in 1986 still disparaged the character of West Street as “a gritty mixture of auto garages, shuttered sex clubs, truckers’ coffee shops and a flurry of construction.”21 Buildings along West Street had begun to be redeveloped and demolished – as early as 1968-69, the Bell Telephone Laboratories, at West and Bank-Bethune Streets, had been converted into Westbeth, a residential complex for artists. Farther north, the Manhattan Refrigerating Co. complex, West Street and Horatio-Gansevoort Streets, was renovated and converted as the West Coast Apartments and opened in the 1980s (the complex today is located within the Gansevoort Market Historic District).
By 1999, the Times observed the Far West Village’s “developers’ gold rush” to convert structures and construct new high rises along the West Street corridor.22 The relatively rare surviving individual rowhouses in the area, such as No. 354 West 11th Street, were also restored for use as single-family homes.
Later History of No. 354 West 11th Street
In 1923, Henrietta M. Knubel Wilshusen sold No. 354 West 11th Street to fireman Anthony Udovicich, and his wife, nee Elena Possidel; they were listed in 1930s city directories living at No. 354. The next owners were Josefa Muino (1946-61), who resided here for a time, and John and Sidney Wasserman (1961-63). Beginning in the late 1950s, directories listed multiple occupants of the house. In 1963-65, the owner/occupant was John F. Mehegan (1916-1984), a noted jazz pianist, recording artist, teacher (including Juilliard, 1947-64), and author of numerous books, including the widely used 4-volume work Jazz Improvisation. Mehegan had been the composer of the musical score for Tennessee Williams’ Broadway play “A Streetcar Named Desire” (1947), which he played offstage during its initial run. No. 354 was briefly owned (1965-67) by Sophie G. Griscom, a Maine resident.
The building was transferred in 1967 to the 354 West Eleventh Street Corp. (Lester Fiske); Fiske resided here c. 1975-86. In 1988, it was sold to Neil and Susan Selkirk. A London-born photographer, Neil Selkirk has specialized in portraits and advertising and corporate work, which has been widely published in magazines, and has been an instructor at Parsons School of Design. He has been the sole person authorized to print the work of photographer Diane Arbus since her death in 1971.
Today, No. 354 West 11th Street is a relatively rare surviving residential building of the early period of development of the far western section of Greenwich Village, and is one of the best extant examples of the Greek Revival style rowhouses of the 1830s-40s located in the Hudson River waterfront section of Manhattan, specifically the area west of the Greenwich Village Historic District between West 14th Street and Lower Manhattan.
Description
This 3-story (plus basement) Greek Revival style rowhouse is clad in machine-pressed red brick laid in stretcher bond above a (painted) rusticated brownstone base. The areaway, bordered by stone with historic wrought-iron railings and gate, has steps and concrete and bluestone paving. The basement level has two windows with non-historic iron grilles, and an entrance under the stoop with a non-historic iron gate and a wood-and-glass entrance door. The high (painted) stone stoop has historic wrought-iron railings with curved newel-posts. The main entrance has a (painted) brownstone surround with pilasters supporting a denticulated entablature, and a recessed doorway with pilasters, sidelights, a triple-light transom, and a paneled wooden door. Sconces are placed on the reveals.
Windows have molded brownstone lintels and plain sills, recede in size from the first- to third-story levels, and have six-over-six double-hung wood sash (six-over-nine on the first-story level) (installed c. post-1980; previously, twoover-two double-hung wood sash). Planters are set on metal brackets below the first-story windows. One through-the-wall air conditioner is located below the center window of the second story. The facade is terminated by a c. 1870s pressed metal, denticulated and modillioned cornice (four brackets were removed prior to c. 1980).
- From the 2007 NYCLPC Landmark Designation Report
From Wikipedia: partial history
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_President_Lines
In August 1938, the United States Maritime Commission judged the Dollar Shipping Company unsound and assumed control over it, appointing William Gibbs McAdoo to succeed R. Stanley Dollar and Joseph R. Sheehan as the new president of the line. The first item of business was an amendment to the corporate charter, renaming the line as "American President Lines".[2][18] American Mail Line was also sold to tobacco magnate Richard J. Reynolds and reorganized as an independent company. With that the Dollar Steamship, a long potent force in American shipping, became part of maritime history.[20]
By 1940, the U.S. government had commissioned 16 new ships for APL, continuing the "president" naming of ships, one of these examples being SS President Jackson, a C-3 class merchant vessel. In 1941, the U.S. entered World War II, and in 1942 the War Shipping Administration was created, of which APL was an agent. APL worked on the management of some of the Administration's ships, maintaining and overhauling them as well as crewing them and being responsible for the handling of cargo and passengers. APL's own ships were used, in addition to the many Liberty and Victory ships that were built. In 1944, an additional 16 ships were built specifically for APL, including SS President Buchanan, a Victory class vessel. At the end of the war in 1945, the company's assets were valued at $40 million.[2][21]
One of the APL ships in World War II still survives. SS Lane Victory is a Victory ship that is preserved as a museum ship in the San Pedro area of Los Angeles, California. As a rare surviving Victory ship, she is a U.S. National Historic Landmark. The Lane Victory was built by the California Shipbuilding Corporation in Los Angeles, California and launched on 31 May 1945.[22]
In 1945, R. Stanley Dollar, son of Robert Dollar, initiated court proceedings in the form of the Dollar case, in an attempt to force the return of the company from the government to his family. This case would last seven years, with the government continuing the operation of APL in the meantime. APL restarted its round-the-world passenger service, and launched the SS President Cleveland and SS President Wilson the next year, which were advertised as "your American hotel abroad." In the 1950s, the company again expanded, building more ships; 11 were built between 1952 and 1954. These included C-4 class cargo ships. Also, a settlement was finally reached in the Dollar case. Rather than the Dollar family taking back the company, it was sold to a group of investors led by Ralph K. Davies for $18.3 million.[2][21] At this time Davies also acquired control of American Mail Line with the aim of reintegrating it into APL.
In 1958, the company began investigating the possibility of containerization, and sent research teams into 28 major ports. Following their reports, Davies began integrating containers into the company's business. By 1961, the company had begun launching ships capable of container transport, the first two of these being the combination break-bulk - container vessels SS President Tyler and SS President Lincoln. Ports also began adapting to the new container-based system, although many potential customers were still wary. By the end of the decade, the company was still launching combination ships rather than fully cellular container ships as already employed by several U.S., British, European and Japanese lines, yet by 1969, 23% of the company's business moved via container.[2][21][23] In 1961, APL moved it headquarters to the newly constructed International Building at the intersection of California and Kearny Streets in San Francisco's financial district.[24]
With the darkness of winter rolling over the Main West CFCLAs CM3303 and CM3301 interupt the stillness of Brewongle with 1877 containerized log service to Kelso. Both CMs are on lease to SSR
Greenwich Village, Manhattan
No. 354 West 11th Street is a relatively rare surviving residential building of the early period of the mixed-use development that came to characterize the far western section of Greenwich Village, which was built up with residences for the middle and professional classes, industry, and transportation-and maritime-related commerce. It is also one of the best extant examples of the Greek Revival style rowhouses of the 1830s-40s located in the Hudson River waterfront section of Manhattan, specifically the area west of the Greenwich Village Historic District between West 14th Street and Lower Manhattan. The Greek Revival style characteristics of the house are its 3story height; machine-pressed red brickwork laid in stretcher bond; stoop and areaway with wrought-ironwork; entrance with pilasters, entablature, sidelights, and transom; molded brownstone lintels; and flat roofline.
The building was constructed c.1841-42, apparently for William B. Fash, a carver and “composition ornament” manufacturer, and his wife, Frances, who were foreclosed in 1843. It was next owned, until 1852, by attorney Edwin L.B. Brooks and his wife, Catherine. They never resided here, but leased it to merchant-class tenants, as did subsequent owners. The first long-term owners of the property, from 1866 to 1923, were the family of Friedrich C. Knubel, a German-born grocer. The Knubels lived in No. 354 in 1870-75, and in 1871 extended the house in the rear; it is likely the pressed metal cornice on the front facade dates from this period. A son, Frederick Hermann Knubel, born the year they moved into the house, went on to study for the ministry and became the first president of the United Lutheran Church in America (1918-45). In the 20th and 21st centuries, the building has housed single-family and multiple residents.
DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS
The Development of the Far West Village
In the early 17th century, the area now known as the Far West Village was a Lenape encampment for fishing and planting known as Sapokanican, identified through archeology and historical documents at the foot of Gansevoort Street. During Dutch rule, the second director general (1633-37) of New Amsterdam, Wouter van Twiller, “claimed” a huge area of land in and around today=s Greenwich Village for his personal plantation, Bossen Bouwerie, where he cultivated tobacco. Starting in the 1640s, freed African slaves were granted and farmed parcels of land near current-day Washington Square, Minetta Lane, and Thompson Street, establishing the nucleus of a community of African-Americans that remained in this location until the Civil War.
Under British rule during the 18th century, the area of Greenwich Village was the location of the small rural hamlet of Greenwich, as well as the country seats and summer homes of wealthy downtown aristocrats, merchants, and capitalists. The vicinity of the Far West Village was amassed during the 1740s by Sir Peter Warren as part of a vast tract of land along the North (Hudson) River. An admiral in the British Navy, Warren earned a fortune in war prize money and had extensive land holdings throughout the New York region. As historian Jill Lepore suggests based on a review of documents at The New-York Historical Society, “Warren appears to have owned a sizable number of slaves.”2 Warren’s three daughters, who resided in England, inherited the property after his death in 1752 and slowly sold off portions. In 1788, Richard Amos, one of Warren’s trustees, acquired the portion of the estate north of today’s Christopher Street, between Hudson and Washington Streets.
The land west of this tract was acquired by 1794 by Abijah Hammond, another Warren trustees and also owner of holdings to the southeast. According to the New York Census (1790 to 1810), Hammond owned several slaves, while Amos had none.
New York State=s first prison, the 4-acre “State Prison at Greenwich,” or Newgate State Prison, was constructed in 1796-97, with grounds extending between today=s Christopher, Perry, and Washington Streets and the North (Hudson) River shoreline. The land was transferred from Hammond. Newgate=s massive buildings, surrounded by high stone walls, were designed by Joseph-Francois Mangin, later the architect of City Hall (1802-11, with John McComb, Jr.) and (old) St. Patrick=s Cathedral (1809-15) on Mott Street.3 Prisoners were transferred here from the old Bridewell jail in City Hall Park. “A more pleasant, airy, and salubrious spot could not have been selected in the vicinity of New York,”4 stated an observer in 1801, and the prison, as one of the area’s most imposing structures, became one of Greenwich’s first tourist attractions. Ferry service was established from the prison=s dock to Hoboken in 1799.
The Greenwich Hotel, opened in 1809 near the prison, became a popular summer hostelry and daily stage service was begun from the hotel to lower Manhattan in 1811. A number of cholera and yellow fever epidemics in lower Manhattan between 1799 and 1822 led to an influx of settlers in the Greenwich area, with the population quadrupling between 1825 and 1840. Previously undeveloped tracts of land were speculatively subdivided for the construction of town houses and rowhouses. By the 1820s and 30s, as commercial development and congestion increasingly disrupted and displaced New Yorkers living near City Hall Park, the elite moved northward into Greenwich Village, particularly the area east of Sixth Avenue. Throughout the 19th century, Greenwich Village developed as a primarily residential precinct, with the usual accompanying institutions and commercial activities.
The far western section of Greenwich Village developed with mixed uses, including residences for the middle and professional classes, industry, and transportation- and maritime-related commerce.
Street improvements were made in the vicinity. Amos (later West 10th), Perry, and Charles Streets were surveyed in 1796 and, extending westerly only to the prison grounds, deeded to the City in 1809 by Richard Amos. Christopher Street had been the northern boundary of the Trinity Church Farm, granted to the church by the Crown of England in 1708; it was laid out prior to 1799, opened as a street in 1817, and paved in 1825. Hammond (later West 11th) Street was laid out by 1799 leading to a wharf on the river. Amos subdivided his land into lots by 1817, as did Hammond in 1827. South of the prison, landfill extended the shoreline westward, and West Street was laid out by 1824. In 1828, a pier was opened at the end of Christopher Street that became a transfer depot for lumber and building materials. In 1826, the City of New York acquired from the State the Newgate prison, and prisoners were moved to Sing Sing Prison in 1828-29.
The City plotted and sold the prison land in 1829, reserving the blockfront along West Street between Christopher and Amos Streets for a public market. Jacob Lorillard purchased the prison buildings, which he converted into a sanitorium spa in 1831. Around the same time, the former farms located along Christopher Street were plotted and readied for development.
A public Greenwich Market had existed since 1813 on the south side of Christopher Street between Greenwich and Washington Streets, on land formerly owned by Trinity Church. The market house was enlarged in 1819 and 1828, and the streetbed of Christopher Street was widened west of Greenwich Street to accommodate the market business and wagon traffic. Market business here was negatively affected by the 1833 opening of the Jefferson Market at Greenwich Lane (later Avenue) and Sixth Avenue, and the Greenwich Market was closed in 1835. The new market, also officially called the Greenwich Market but known as the “Weehawken Market” to differentiate it from the old market one block away on Christopher Street, was constructed in 1834, but only operated until 1844.
Examples of the earliest surviving residential buildings located in the far western section of Greenwich Village, all rowhouses, include: the rare, vernacular wood-framed No. 132 Charles Street (c. 1819), attributed to carpenter Matthew Armstrong, a co-owner/occupant who was active in neighborhood development, and extended one story c. 1853, attributed to carpenters/owner-occupants John and Levi Springsteen; Nos. 651, 653 and 655 Washington Street (1829), 3-1/2-story, brick-clad Federal style houses owned by merchant Samuel Norsworthy; No. 398 West Street (1830-31), a 3-1/2-story, brick-clad Federal style house built for flour merchant Isaac Amerman; No. 7 Weehawken Street (c. 1830-31), a 3-story, brick-clad rowhouse/stable owned by carpenter Jacob P. Roome; No. 131 Charles Street (1834), an intact, relatively rare and late example of a 2-1/2-story, brick-clad Federal style house, owned by stone cutter David Christie and a designated New York City Landmark since 1966; No. 269 West 10th Street (c. 1835), a Greek Revival style (now altered) house for widow Hannah Jenkins; and No. 159 Charles Street (c. 1838), a brick-clad Greek Revival style house built for merchant Henry J. Wyckoff and today a designated New York City Landmark.
Three activities helped to spur commercial activity in the vicinity. Ferry service to Hoboken was reinstituted by 1841 at the foot of Christopher Street (earlier service, after 1799, was from the prison dock). Around 1845, part of the Newgate prison site was adapted for use as a brewery by Nash, Beadleston & Co. (later Beadleston & Woerz). In 1846, the Hudson River Railroad was incorporated, and was constructed along West Street, terminating in a station at Chambers Street in 1851 (this was replaced by the St. John’s Park Terminal for freight in 1868).
Construction and 19th-Century Ownership and Residency of No. 354 West 11th Street
This block, formerly part of the Greenwich Village land holdings of Abijah Hammond (the western, underwater portion of which he acquired in 1821), was extended by landfill and later plotted and sold by Hammond in 1827. This lot was acquired by cartman/milkman Jonathan Lounsberry and his wife, Charlotte, who built a house here c. 1828. The address was originally No. 144 Hammond Street (the name was officially changed to West 11th Street by the City Council in 1865).7 The house was sold in 1830 to Charles Gilmore, a New Jersey resident, and his wife, Elizabeth, and in 1832 to James Agnew, a lawyer who lived here. In 1838, however, a fire in the Baurmeister & Scheplin soap factory located in the rear of No. 160 Hammond Street destroyed much of the block, including some 50 buildings.8 The 1841 tax assessments listed Agnew’s lot (with no building) at $1600.
That year, Agnew was foreclosed, and the property was briefly owned by John Westervelt, Jr., a coal merchant. It was purchased in October 1841 for $2250 by William B. Fash, a carver and “composition ornament” manufacturer (at 192 Varick Street), and his wife, Frances. The 1842 tax assessments listed Fash’s “house and lot” at $2500, with the annotation “unfinished.” (City directories in 1842-43 indicate that Fash was living at No. 752 Greenwich. The 1843 tax assessment for the 144 Hammond Street property is missing). In April 1843, a foreclosure action against Fash was concluded by George O. Post and Edward Mitchell, guardians of George Edward Post, and the Greek Revival style rowhouse was placed at auction. The highest bidder ($3325) was attorney Edwin L.B. Brooks and his wife, Catherine M., then residents of No. 47 Bank Street. The 1844 assessment of this property was $4000.
The Brookses never resided at No. 144 Hammond Street, but leased it. The earliest known tenants were Eliza Scott (1849-50), the widow of Charles T. Scott, a drygoods merchant living at No. 7 Hammond Street in 184849; drygoods merchant Willet Hawkins and his wife, Sarah (1849-52); and typemaker C. Joepfer (1851). After Brooks’ death, the house was sold in 1852 to undertaker Peter Relyea and his wife, Margaretta (it was briefly held in 1853 by Asa W. Roath, ice merchant, and his wife, Hanna Maria, but reverted to the Relyeas). In 1854, Relyea advertised: “ROOMS TO LET: On the first floor of house No. 144 Hammond-st... N.Y.. consisting of two parlors, two bed-rooms, and cook kitchen in the rear. Inquire of PETER RELYEA on the premises.”9 The house was acquired that year by Joshua and Mary Stafford Read.
Read (1783-1865), a prosperous farmer/businessman and a resident of Palatine Bridge, N.Y., was the uncle of Susan Brownell Anthony (1820-1906), the future women’s rights advocate – the brother of her mother, Lucy Read Anthony, he had significantly assisted the Anthony family when it was ruined financially in the Panic of 1837. In 1859, Read transferred this property to his daughter, Eleanor J. Read Caldwell, wife of merchant George Caldwell (Eleanor J. Caldwell had been listed in the tax assessments here as early as 1854), who retained it until 1866.
The Read/Caldwell family never lived here, but rented the house in 1856-62 to clerk David S. Lockwood (1825-1891), who had married Eleanor C. Griswold in 1856.
In 1866, the house (now No. 354 West 11th Street) was purchased by Friedrich (Frederick) C. Knubel (18271908), a German-born grocer who had immigrated in 1855, and his wife, Katherine (Anna) Knubel Knubel. The Knubels were the first long-term owners of the property. Formerly residents of Nos. 163 and 145 Hammond Street (his business was at No. 137 Hammond), the Knubels lived in No. 354 in 1870-75 and in 1871 extended the house about 11 feet in the rear. It is likely the pressed metal, denticulated, modillioned, and bracketed cornice on the front facade dates from their ownership. Their son, Frederick Hermann Knubel (1870-1945), born the year they moved into the house, went on to study for the ministry and became the first president of the United Lutheran Church in America (1918-45). After the senior Frederick Knubel’s death in 1908, the property was transferred in 1909 to his daughter, Henrietta M. Knubel Wilshusen (c. 1861-1929), the wife of John Wilshusen (died 1915), who retained it until 1923.
Greek Revival Style Rowhouses in Manhattan
As the city of New York grew in the period after the Revolution, large plots of land in Manhattan were sold and subdivided for the construction of groups of brick-clad houses. Their architectural style has been called “Federal” after the new republic, but in form and detail they continued the Georgian style of Great Britain. Federal style houses were constructed from the Battery as far north as 23rd Street between the 1790s and 1830s. The size of the lot dictated the size of the house: typically each house lot was 20 or 25 feet wide by 90 to 100 feet deep, which accorded with the rectilinear plan of New York City, adopted as the Commissioners’ Plan in 1811. The rowhouse itself would be as wide as the lot, and 35 to 40 feet deep. This allowed for a stoop and small front yard, or areaway, and a fairly spacious rear yard. During the early 19th century, several houses were often constructed together, sharing common party walls, chimneys, and roof timbering to form a continuous group.
The houses, of load-bearing masonry or modified timber-frame construction, had brick-clad front facades. With the increasing availability of pattern books, such as Asher Benjamin’s American Builders Companion (published in six editions between 1806 and 1827), local builders had access to drawings and instructions for exterior and interior plans and details. Federal style rowhouses usually had a 3-bay facade with two full stories over a high basement and an additional half story under a peaked roof with the ridge line running parallel to the front facade. The front facade was usually clad in red brick laid in the Flemish bond pattern, with stone trim, commonly brownstone. The planar quality of the facades was relieved by ornament in the form of lintels, entrances, stoops and areaways with iron railings, cornices, and dormers. The most ornamental feature was the doorway, often framed with columns and sidelights and topped with a rectangular transom or fanlight, and having a wooden paneled door.
The wood-framed sash were double hung and multi-light (typically six-over-six). A wooden cornice with a molded fascia extended across the front along the eave. Pedimented or segmental dormers on the front roof slope usually had decorative wood trim.
Around 1830, builders in New York City began to incorporate some Greek Revival style features on grander Federal style houses, such as the Seabury Tredwell (“Old Merchant’s”) House (1831-32), 29 East 4th Street. During the early 1830s, fashionable rowhouses were constructed in a Greek Revival style that was distinct from the earlier Federal style houses. Local builders were influenced by the designs and builder’s guides of architects such as Asher Benjamin, Minard Lafever, and Alexander Jackson Davis. Some examples were “high style,” such as the nine marble-fronted houses with a continuous Corinthian colonnade known as LaGrange Terrace or Colonnade Row (1832-33, attributed to Seth Greer), of which Nos. 428-434 Lafayette Street survive. Many rows of speculatively-built Greek Revival style houses were constructed, particularly in the Greenwich Village and Chelsea neighborhoods, during the period of enormous growth and development in New York City during the 1830s-40s.
Greek Revival style rowhouses, which became widely popular, basically continued many of the traditions of Federal style houses, including 3-bay front facades, brick cladding with brownstone trim, and raised stoops and areaways with iron railings. They differed, however, in stylistic details and in scale, being taller and somewhat grander at a full three stories above a basement (with higher ceilings per story). By this period, technological advances in brickmaking allowed for higher quality, machine-pressed brick. The brick was laid in a bond other than Flemish, such as stretcher bond. Ornamentation was spare, including simple, molded rectangular lintels and a flat roofline capped by a denticulated and molded wooden cornice (sometimes with attic windows). Like on Federal style houses, the most ornamental feature was the doorway.
The Greek Revival style doorway was recessed, with a rectangular transom, sidelights, and paneled (often a single vertical panel) door. On grander houses, the entrance featured a portico with Doric or Ionic columns flanking the doorway and supporting a prominent entablature. Examples of this type include “The Row” (1832-33), 1-13 Washington Square North, and the Samuel Tredwell Skidmore House (1845), 37 East 4th Street. More commonly, the entrance featured a brownstone surround with wide pilasters supporting an entablature. No. 354 West 11th Street is of this latter type. The wood-framed sash were double hung and typically six-over-six (often nine-over-nine or six-over-nine on the parlor level).
Late-19th and 20th Century History of the Far West Village
New York City had developed as the largest port in the United States by the early 19th century, and in the early 20th century emerged as one of the busiest ports in the world. In Manhattan, South Street along the East River had been the primary artery for maritime commerce, but West Street became a competitor in the 1870s and supplanted the former by about 1890. After the Civil War, New York also flourished as the commercial and financial center of the country. The continued mixed-use character of the Far West Village is evidenced by industries located on the southern side of the block behind No. 354 West 11th Street – an 1879 map shows an iron foundry here, while an 1885 map indicates a coalyard. To the west, there was a boat basin on the Hudson River.12
At the turn of the century, the New York Times and New York Police Department considered the section of the Hudson River waterfront along the piers between Houston and West 14th Streets particularly unsavory. A 1902 newspaper article stated that “for years, especially in fine weather, it has at night been the resort of outcasts, drunkards, dissolute people, and a dangerous class of depredators and petty highwaymen...” 13 A major public undertaking that had a profound impact on this section of the waterfront was the construction, by the New York City Department of Docks, of the Gansevoort Piers (1894-1902) and Chelsea Piers (1902-10, with Warren & Wetmore), between West 11th and West 23rd Streets. These long docks accommodated the enormous trans-Atlantic steamships of the “United States, Grace, Cunard White Star, Panama Pacific, and American Merchant” lines.
This area was described in 1914 as “in the heart of the busiest section of the port, adjacent to the transatlantic liners, coast and gulf vessels, between Christopher and 23rd Streets, surrounded by 5,000 seamen of all nationalities” of the half a million seamen that came into the harbor each year.
After a period of decline, Greenwich Village was becoming known, prior to World War I, for its historic and picturesque qualities, its affordable housing, and the diversity of its population and social and political ideas. Many artists and writers, as well as tourists, were attracted to the Village. At the same time, as observed by museum curator Jan S. Ramirez,
As early as 1914 a committee of Village property owners, merchants, social workers, and realtors had embarked on a campaign to combat the scruffy image the local bohemian populace had created for the community. ... Under the banner of the Greenwich Village Improvement Society and the Greenwich Village Rebuilding Corporation, this alliance of residents and businesses also rallied to arrest the district=s physical deterioration... their ultimate purpose was to reinstate higher-income-level families and young professionals in the Village to stimulate its economy. Shrewd realtors began to amass their holdings of dilapidated housing. 16
These various factors and the increased desirability of the Village led to a real estate boom – “rents increased during the 1920s by 140 percent and in some cases by as much as 300 percent”.17 The desirability of the far western section of Greenwich Village as a residential community by the late 1920s is exemplified by the conversion of multiple dwellings and other building types into middleclass apartments.
The completion of the Holland Tunnel (1919-27) and, especially, the elevated Miller Highway (1929-31) above West Street, while providing easier access between the Hudson River waterfront and the metropolitan region, had a number of effects on real estate values and on the uses of buildings, particularly along West Street. The Federal Writers’ Project’s New York City Guide (1939) described this stretch of the waterfront along West Street, the “most lucrative water-front property in the world,” as follows:
Although the western rim of Manhattan is but a small section of New Yorks far-flung port, along it is concentrated the largest aggregate of marine enterprises in the world. Glaciers of freight and cargo move across this strip of ... water front. It is the domain of the super-liner, but it is shared by the freighter, the river boat, the ferry, and the soot-faced tug... Ships and shipping are not visible along much of West Street. South of Twenty-third Street, the river is walled by an almost unbroken line of bulkhead sheds and dock structures... Opposite the piers, along the entire length of the highway, nearly every block houses its quota of cheap lunchrooms, tawdry saloons and waterfront haberdasheries catering to the thousands of polyglot seamen who haunt the “front.” Men “on the beach” (out of employment) usually make their headquarters in barrooms, which are frequented mainly by employees of lines leasing piers in their vicinity.
In 1961, Mayor Robert Wagner announced an urban renewal plan for the far western section of Greenwich Village that would have included the 12 blocks bounded by West, Christopher, Hudson, and West 11th Streets, and another 2 blocks along West Street south of Christopher Street. As reported in the Times in March 1961, residents of the site immediately rallied in vigorous protest. Their spokesman [sic] was Mrs. Jane Jacobs, an editor of Architectural Forum magazine, who lives with her family in a house they own at 555 Hudson Street. The entire site, the group said, contains only a negligible amount of blight. It would be unconscionable, they argued, to demolish any of their well-maintained homes to make way for a bleak, architecturally sterile, institutional housing development.
The Housing and Redevelopment Board responded that its intention was actually to “remove the industrial buildings, warehouses and trucking depots that threaten the neighborhood.”19 That same year, Jane Jacobs authored the influential The Death and Life of Great American Cities. The urban renewal plan for this area was never to proceed as initially envisioned by the City. Jacobs, on behalf of the West Village Committee, wrote to the newly formed New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission in 1963 (prior to the passage of the Landmarks Law in 1965 which enabled designations), urging that any consideration of a Greenwich Village historic district include the far western section of the Village to West Street.
After 1960, with the introduction of containerized shipping and the accompanying need for large facilities (space for which could be accommodated in Brooklyn and New Jersey), the Manhattan waterfront rapidly declined as the center of New York’s maritime commerce. In addition, airplanes replaced ocean liners carrying passengers overseas. Most of the piers and many of the buildings associated with Manhattan’s Hudson River maritime history have been demolished.
In 1974, the Miller Elevated Highway was closed, and it was subsequently demolished in the 1980s. The buildings along West Street, formerly in the permanent shadow of the highway, were exposed again. A New York Times writer in 1986 still disparaged the character of West Street as “a gritty mixture of auto garages, shuttered sex clubs, truckers’ coffee shops and a flurry of construction.”21 Buildings along West Street had begun to be redeveloped and demolished – as early as 1968-69, the Bell Telephone Laboratories, at West and Bank-Bethune Streets, had been converted into Westbeth, a residential complex for artists. Farther north, the Manhattan Refrigerating Co. complex, West Street and Horatio-Gansevoort Streets, was renovated and converted as the West Coast Apartments and opened in the 1980s (the complex today is located within the Gansevoort Market Historic District).
By 1999, the Times observed the Far West Village’s “developers’ gold rush” to convert structures and construct new high rises along the West Street corridor.22 The relatively rare surviving individual rowhouses in the area, such as No. 354 West 11th Street, were also restored for use as single-family homes.
Later History of No. 354 West 11th Street
In 1923, Henrietta M. Knubel Wilshusen sold No. 354 West 11th Street to fireman Anthony Udovicich, and his wife, nee Elena Possidel; they were listed in 1930s city directories living at No. 354. The next owners were Josefa Muino (1946-61), who resided here for a time, and John and Sidney Wasserman (1961-63). Beginning in the late 1950s, directories listed multiple occupants of the house. In 1963-65, the owner/occupant was John F. Mehegan (1916-1984), a noted jazz pianist, recording artist, teacher (including Juilliard, 1947-64), and author of numerous books, including the widely used 4-volume work Jazz Improvisation. Mehegan had been the composer of the musical score for Tennessee Williams’ Broadway play “A Streetcar Named Desire” (1947), which he played offstage during its initial run. No. 354 was briefly owned (1965-67) by Sophie G. Griscom, a Maine resident.
The building was transferred in 1967 to the 354 West Eleventh Street Corp. (Lester Fiske); Fiske resided here c. 1975-86. In 1988, it was sold to Neil and Susan Selkirk. A London-born photographer, Neil Selkirk has specialized in portraits and advertising and corporate work, which has been widely published in magazines, and has been an instructor at Parsons School of Design. He has been the sole person authorized to print the work of photographer Diane Arbus since her death in 1971.
Today, No. 354 West 11th Street is a relatively rare surviving residential building of the early period of development of the far western section of Greenwich Village, and is one of the best extant examples of the Greek Revival style rowhouses of the 1830s-40s located in the Hudson River waterfront section of Manhattan, specifically the area west of the Greenwich Village Historic District between West 14th Street and Lower Manhattan.
Description
This 3-story (plus basement) Greek Revival style rowhouse is clad in machine-pressed red brick laid in stretcher bond above a (painted) rusticated brownstone base. The areaway, bordered by stone with historic wrought-iron railings and gate, has steps and concrete and bluestone paving. The basement level has two windows with non-historic iron grilles, and an entrance under the stoop with a non-historic iron gate and a wood-and-glass entrance door. The high (painted) stone stoop has historic wrought-iron railings with curved newel-posts. The main entrance has a (painted) brownstone surround with pilasters supporting a denticulated entablature, and a recessed doorway with pilasters, sidelights, a triple-light transom, and a paneled wooden door. Sconces are placed on the reveals.
Windows have molded brownstone lintels and plain sills, recede in size from the first- to third-story levels, and have six-over-six double-hung wood sash (six-over-nine on the first-story level) (installed c. post-1980; previously, twoover-two double-hung wood sash). Planters are set on metal brackets below the first-story windows. One through-the-wall air conditioner is located below the center window of the second story. The facade is terminated by a c. 1870s pressed metal, denticulated and modillioned cornice (four brackets were removed prior to c. 1980).
- From the 2007 NYCLPC Landmark Designation Report
Meatpacking District, Manhattan
Commercial Tenants
New England Biscuit Works (1889); E[lmer]. S. Burnham & Co.1 E.S. Burnham Paclng Co., canned goods, druggist sundries (1889-1929); Holmes & Scott, produce (1889); C.D. Bos & Son, crackers/ship biscuits (1902); A. Bohrer & Co., fruit (1929-36); James Fancelli, produce (1929-50); Otto J. Stumpp, seeds (1929-42); Eastern Products Co.1 General Desserts Corp.1 Jersey Belle Food Products Co. (1933-36); William D'Angelo/ Willy's Express (1950); Schmidt's Motor Express (1950); Ronald T. Calvin, meat (1955); Plymouth Beef Co. (1955); Verona Packing, Inc. (1955); Temple Packing Co., meat (1955-70); Western Window Cleaning Co. (1955-59); A. Michaud Co., meat (1959); Edward Seh, Jr., meat (1959); Ben Squires, Inc. (1959); A.G. Savetz Co., meat/poultry (1950); National Purveyor Co., meat (1965); L&S Flanks, meat (1965); James E. Reardon, Inc. (1965); R. Friend & Co. (1970-86); Budget Movers (1970); West Allen Tarwater (1970); Rubin & Schoener, Inc. (1970-75); Knapp Meat Supply, Inc. (1975);
Yama Seafood Co. (1980); Nishimaru, Inc. (1980); Slowik Meat Co. (1980); Rimi Packing Co. (1980); Hughie Wholesale Meats, Inc. (1980); Village Wholesale Meat Corp. (1986-93); Direct Market Transporting (1986); Sal DiFlore, meat (1993); Gotham Seafood Corp. (1993); Hell, club (1999-2003)
History
For nearly a century, from 1847 to 1942, this property belonged to the prominent Goelet family, which held extensive real estate in Manhattan, including 402-408 West 14th Street [see]. This parcel passed in 1849 from Peter Goelet (1800-1879) to Robert Goelet (1809-1879); in 1881 to Robert Goelet (1 841-1 899) and Ogden Goelet (1 846-1897) by partition deed; and, after their deaths, to Robert Walton Goelet (1880-1941) and Anne Marie Guestier Goelet. This building was constructed in 1887, at the time of the widening of Gansevoort Street.
Its unusual shape, an acute triangle, comes from the odd plan of the lot. Architect Joseph M. Dunn executed a number of commissions for the Goelets during his career. Builder-contractor Michael Reid (c. 1832-191 8) later formed the M. Reid Co. which constructed the Ritz-Carlton Hotel, one of the Metropolitan Museum of Art additions, and eleven Carnegie libraries. Reid also built 823-829 Washington Street [see] in 1880. E.S. Burnham & Co.1 E.S. Burnham Packing Co., canned goods and, later, druggist sundries, remained in this location until around 1929. Elmer S. Burnham (c. 1854-1941), born in Michigan, began as a grain broker in Chicago prior to establishing his packing business. Among Burnham's products were clam chowder and clam bouillon.
From 1905 to 1929, the E.S. Burnham Packing Co. operated a clam cannery on Marco Island, Florida. Painted signs still existing on this building advertise Burnham and other tenants. A painted sign at the upper portion of the western wall advertises "BURNHAM'S CLAM CHOWDER" superimposed with "BEET WINE." "NEW ENGLAND BISCUIT WORK" appears above the second story, and Burnham's "CLAM CHOWDER" and "CLAMBOUILLON" are painted above the fourth story, of the Gansevoort Street facade. Tenants in the 1920s-40s included A. Bohrer & Co., fruit; James Fancelli, produce, and Otto J. Stumpp, seeds. Many of the tenants after the mid-1950s were meatpackers. Photographer Berenice Abbott photographed this building as part of her work Changing New York in 1936.
This imposing vernacular style building, which is largely intact, contributes to the historically-mixed architectural character and varied uses - including market-related functions - of the Gansevoort Market Historic District. Constructed in 1887, during one of the major phases of development of the area, when buildings were constructed for produce- and food-related businesses, the building further contributes to the visual cohesion of the district through its brick and stone facades, metal canopy, cast-iron storefronts, and the fact that it is one of seven buildings in the district designed by architect Joseph M. Dunn.
----About the district----
The Gansevoort Market Historic District - consisting of 104 buildings - is distinctive for its architectural character which reflects the area's long history of continuous, varied use as a place of dwelling, industry, and commerce, particularly as a marketplace, and its urban layout. The buildings, most dating from the 1840s through the 1940s, represent four major phases of development, and include both purpose-built structures, designed in then-fashionable styles, and those later adapted for market use. The architecture of the district tells the story of an important era in New York City's history when it became the financial center of the country and when its markets were expanding to serve the metropolitan region and beyond. Visual cohesion is provided to the streetscapes by the predominance of brick as a facade material; the one- to six-story scale; the presence of buildings designed by the same architects, a number of them prominent, including specialists in market-related structures; the existence of metal canopies originally installed for market purposes; and the Belgian block paving still visible on most streets. The street layout is shaped by the transition between the irregular pattern of northwestern Greenwich Village (as far north as Gansevoort Street) and the grid of the 1811 Commissioner's Plan. Unusually large and open intersections contribute to the area's unique quality, particularly where Ninth Avenue meets West 14'~S treet and Gansevoort Street (which was widened in l887), and provide sweeping vistas that showcase the unusual building typology and mixed-use quality of the district. Aside from Tribeca, the Gansevoort Market Historic District is the only remaining marketplace district that served the once-flourishing Hudson River commercial waterfront.
The earliest buildings in the historic district date from the period between 1840 and 1854, most built as rowhouses and town houses, several of which soon became very early working-class tenements (all eventually had stores on the ground floor). The area's early mixed use, however, is evident in the rare surviving early factory building (c. 1849-60), on a flatiron-shaped lot, for Col. Silas C. Herring, a nationally significant manufacturer of safes and locks, at 669-685 Hudson Street.
This mixed use, consisting of single-family houses, multiple dwellings, and industry was unusual for the period. The stretch of Ninth Avenue between Gansevoort and West 15' Streets, albeit altered and interrupted with later additions, offers the vista of a distinctive Manhattan streetscape featuring twenty buildings of the 1840s: the rowhouses at Nos. 3-7 (c. 1849) and Nos. 21-27 (c. 1844-46), the Herring factory, and culminating in the rare, picturesque ensemble of twelve rowhouses and town houses, Nos. 44-60 Ninth Avenue and 351-355 West 14th Street (c. 1841-46), at the wide, angled intersection with Hudson and West 14" Streets. Another business from this period was the woodworking factory of the prominent building firm of James C. Hoe & Co. (c. 1850-54) at 52-58 Gansevoort Street (later altered).
After the Civil War, the area began to flourish commercially as New York City solidified its position as the financial center of the country, and construction resumed in the district in 1870. Two major businesses located here were A.H. Wellington's Merchants' Print Works (1 874, S. W. Johnson), cotton printers at 416-418 West 14" Street (later altered); and the Italianate style Centennial Brewery (1876, John B. Snook) at 409-41 1 West 14' Street.
The bulk of the buildings in the district date from the 1880s through the 1920s and were designed in then-popular historical revival styles. Residential and commercial development, including a variety of building types, was particularly spurred in the 1880s by two major factors. The first was the creation of two nearby municipal markets: the open-air Farmers' or Gansevoort Market (1 879), for regional produce, at Gansevoort and Washington Streets (adjacent to the historic district), and the West Washington Market (1889), for meat, poultry, and dairy products, on the river side of West Street. From the 1880s until World War II, wholesale produce, fruit, groceries, dairy products, eggs, specialty foods, and liquor (until Prohibition) were among the dominant businesses within the district in response to the adjacent markets, particularly along Gansevoort, Little West 12', and Washington Streets. The first of the two-story, purpose-built market buildings in the district were erected in 1880. These vernacular and neo-Grec style structures typified the low-rise market buildings constructed in the district over the next 90 years: produce (or, later, meat) handling on the ground story, shielded by a metal canopy over the sidewalk, and offices on the second story.
Commercial construction during this period, which represents the highest percentage of the district's varied yet distinctive building stock, included not only low-rise purpose-built market buildings, but also, in a variety of period styles, stables buildings, and five- and six-story store-and-loft buildings and warehouses were constructed to house and serve these businesses. The warehouses, in particular, are among the most monumental structures in the district.
The second factor spurring development within the historic district was the 1878 partition of real estate owned by the Astor family, which had remained underdeveloped since John Jacob Astor 1's acquisition in 1819. Of the 104 buildings in the district, over one-third of them were constructed by the Astors and related family members. Astor improvements included the market buildings at 823-833 Washington Street and 32-36 Little West 12" Street (1880, Joseph M. Dunn, James Stroud); the distinguished Queen Anne style French flats building (with stores) at 440 West 14" Street (1887, James W. Cole), the block-long Queen Anne style produce market building at 859- 877 Washington Street (1887, Cole), and the handsome Romanesque Revival style stables building (1893, Thomas R. Jackson) for the New York Biscuit Co. (later Nabisco), the world's largest supplier of crackers, at 439-445 West 14" Street. A number of other prominent owners also invested in real estate here and began to develop their properties: the Goelet family constructed the unusual flatiron-shaped store-and-loft building at 53-61 Gansevoort Street (1887, Dunn), which housed E.S.
Burnham & Co., clam canners; James AlfredRoosevelt owned the warehouse at 400 West 14thS treet (1886, Dunn); and former New York Mayor Hugh J. Grant developed the neo-Romanesque style warehouses (1 899-1900, George P. Chappell) at 97-103 Horatio Street. The Astors and other owners gave several commissions to architects Joseph M. Dunn, who designed seven buildings in the district, and James W. Cole, who designed three buildings in the district. These multiple commissions in the then-fashionable neo-Grec or Queen Anne styles contribute to the district's visual cohesion.
Between 1897 and 1935, nearly the entire block bounded by Gansevoort, Horatio, Washington, and West Streets was developed with a handsome neo-Classical style ensemble in tan brick, by noted architects Lansing C. Holden, J. Graham Glover, and John B. Snook Sons, that included a power plant and nine cold storage warehouses for the Manhattan Refrigerating Co. (incorporated 1894). The company was responsible for installing the system of underground pipes that carried refrigeration to market-related structures throughout the district by about 1906. This infrastructure, along with the completion by the N.Y.C. Dept. of Docks of the nearby Gansevoort Piers (1894-1902) and Chelsea Piers (1902-10, with Warren & Wetmore), docks for the great trans- Atlantic steamships (and the busiest section of New York's port), had profound impacts on the district. The distribution of wholesale meat, poultry, and seafood, particularly for hotels, restaurants, and steamships, emerged as an important business throughout the district, resulting in new construction as well as bringing new uses to existing buildings. Some companies were subsidiaries of major national meatpackers, while other independent firms were among the nation's largest.
The underground refrigeration system, the new piers, and the emergence of new uses relating to the burgeoning hotel and steamship industry further triggered the 20th-century construction and architectural change and flexibility that has shaped the character of the Gansevoort Market Historic District. Typically, commercial redevelopments of neighborhoods in New York City involved the demolition of earlier buildings for structures housing new uses. However, one of the district's unique qualities is that earlier buildings were retained and altered to market uses. Earlier examples include the Centennial Brewery (409-41 1 West 14" Street), converted to meat, produce, and dairy use in 1901, and 21-27 Ninth Avenue, rowhouses adapted in 1923-24 as meat market buildings.
Over the years, the Astors continued their policy of high-quality architectural commissions by hiring distinguished architects known for their significant public, commercial, and residential buildings, such as the neo-Classical style offices and printing plant (1901-02, Trowbridge & Livingston) of P.F. Collier & Son, publisher of books and the nationally-known magazine Collier's, at 416-424 West 13' Street; the neo-Romanesque style liquor warehouse at 29-35 Ninth Avenue (1902-03, Boring & Tilton); and the Arts and Crafts style warehouse building (1913, LaFarge, Morris & Cullen) at 5 Little West 1 2 '~S treet.
The completion of the Holland Tunnel (1927), the elevated Miller Highway (1931), and the New York Central Railroad's elevated freight railway (1934) providedeasier access between the area and the metropolitan region and spurred another major phase of new low-rise construction and the functional conversion of existing buildings for market use in the district. New structures included the earlyInternationa1 style General Electric Co. annex (1929-30, Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.) at 414 West 14' Street, and the Moderne style John Morrell & Co. meat market building (1936-37, H. Peter Henschien) at 446-448 West 14'~S treet. The unusually wide Gansevoort Street assumed its distinctive character of low-rise market buildings with metal canopies at this time, through such new construction as the fruitlproduce market building (1938-39, Charles H. Stadler) at No. 46-50, and the Moderne style R&L Restaurant (1949), at No.69, and newly adapted structures, including No. 52-58 (formerly James C. Hoe & Co.), altered as a market building in 1937, and No. 60-68 (1880-81 tenements), reduced to a two-story market building in 1940.
By World War II, poultry- and meat- packing had consolidated as the main commercial activity within the district. Maritime commerce along the Hudson River waterfront declined by the 1960s, however, with the end of the ocean liner era and the rise of containerized shipping. Changes in the meat and poultry industries meant a lessening presence in this area. The Manhattan Refrigerating Co. closed in 1979 and its buildings were subsequently converted to apartments.
The completion of several more transportation and development projects (most located outside the historic district) in the 1930s spurred another major phase of new low-rise construction and functional conversion for market use of existing buildings within the historic district. Easier access was provided between the market area and the metropolitan region. The construction of the elevated Miller Highway (1929-3 1) necessitated the displacement of some produce and meat and poultry merchants in both the Gansevoort and West Washington Markets, including the demolition of several buildings at the latter. The Port of New York Authority built the Union Inland Terminal No. 1 (1931-32, Abbott, Merkt & Co.), a unified truck-rail terminal (modeled functionally after the Starrett-Lehigh Building), just northeast of the district and occupying the entire block at Ninth Avenue and West 15" Street.
The New York Central Railroad's elevated freight railway (193 1-34) passed through some thirty buildings on its route southward to the new St. John's Park Freight Terminal at West and Clarkson Streets. This railway also used part of the Gansevoort Market site, and additionally, the City constructed a meat processing plant on the market site (1939). The Lincoln Tunnel (1937) provided a second automotive route to New Jersey. The Ninth Avenue el, which ran through the district, was demolished (c. 1940); streetcar tracks located below the el had been taken up in 1936.
The first new purpose-built low-scale (one-story) market building in the historic district was 14-20 Little West 12" Street (1928, John B. Snook Sons), for the Wendel family and used initially by produce merchants. The P.F. Collier & Son building at 416-424 West 13" Street became a warehouse of the General Electric Co. in 1929; an early International style annex (1929-30, Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.) was constructed next door at 414 West 14" Street. Owned by Vincent Astor, this was the last of the Astor improvements within the district. 13 and 15 Little West 12' Street (1933, Martin Smith) were one-story fruit market buildings. Designed in the Moderne style were the John Morrell & Co. meat market building (1936-37, H. Peter Henschien) at 446-448 West 14th Street; the meat market building at 837-843 Washington Street (1938, David M. Oltarsh); and the fruitlproduce market building at 46-50 Gansevoort Street (1938-39, Charles H. Stadler).
Built at a time when the growing prevalence of the automobile resulted in the predominance of new market types throughout the U.S. (such as drive-in markets, chain grocery stores, and supermarkets), these buildings are rare and late examples of the older market building typology.34 Many of the buildings in the district that were architecturally adapted for market functions were properties acquired through foreclosure at the height of the Depression. Most of these buildings were functionally maximized at two stories (vacant, formerly residential, upper stories were no longer necessary): the lower story was refrigerated for produce or meat use and the upper story held offices. The unusually wide Gansevoort Street assumed its distinctive character of low-rise market buildings with metal canopies at this time, largely through such newly-adapted structures, including the vernacular style No. 52-58 (formerly James C. Hoe & Co.), altered as a fruit and produce market building in 1937 (S. Walter Katz); the neo-Grec style No. 60-68 (five 1880-81 tenements), reduced to a two-story market building in 1940 (Voorhees, Walker, Foley & Smith); and No. 7 1-73 (aka 8 17- 821 Washington Street) (three 1886-87 Queen Anne style French flats buildings), reduced to three stories in 1940 for use as a meat market building. The neo-Grec and utilitarian style 823-833 Washington Street and neo-Grec style 32-36 Little West 12" Street, 1880 two-story market buildings, were also altered in 1940-41 for meat merchants.
By World War II, poultry- and meat- packing had consolidated as the main commercial activity throughout the district. The opening of the Queens Live Poultry Terminal Market (1941) caused poultry dealers to move from the West Washington Market, replaced in part by produce merchants. The creation in 1950 of the Gansevoort Market Meat Center on the site of Gansevoort Market and the demolition of the remaining West Washington Market buildings, with the associated displacement of the businesses at both locations, hastened changes within the district. In 1959, the Gansevoort Market area was referred to in the New York Times as "the largest meat and poultry receiving market in the world. In the district, 408-412 West 13" Street (1941, Charles N. & Selig Whinston) was a new two-story market building used by hides/skins and meat businesses, while 36- 40 Gansevoort Street (aka 831-835 Greenwich Street) (1947-48, Horace Ginsbern & Assocs.), for poultry businesses, was the last new purpose-built market building in the district. The Moderne style R & L Restaurant (1949), 69 Gansevoort Street, resulted from the alteration of a three-story house.
Alterations associated with conversions to meat market uses included 809-813 Washington Street (aka 70-74 Gansevoort Street) (1940-42, Voorhees, Walker, Foley & Smith), a freight trucking depot altered in 1950; 402-404 and 406 West 13th Street (1840s rowhouses) altered in1950 and 1955 (Abraham L. Seiden); and 15 and 13 Little West 12" Street (c. 1961 and 1969 additions, bylattributed to Seiden).
Today, the Gansevoort Market Historic District is a vibrant neighborhood of remaining meatpackers, high-end retail commerce, restaurants, offices, clubs, galleries, and apartments, that retains, despite recent changes, a strong and integral sense of place as a market district, due to its distinctive streetscapes, metal canopies, notable buildings, both purpose-built and those adapted over the years for market use, and unusual street pattern with its Belgian block paving.
- From the 2003 NYCLPC Landmark Designation Report
STS059-071-027 Osaka/Kobi Area, Honshu, Japan April 1994
The location of the complex and extensive port and harbor facilities that handles cargo (containerized and other) from ocean going ships is apparent in this detailed view of Osaka and Kobe. These two port cities plus other urban areas that are integrated into one large metroplex are located along the northeast end of the Osaka Bay at the eastern end of Japan’s Inland Sea. The two manmade islands (results of land reclamation projects-slightly above center) along the north edge of Osaka Bay are part of the modern Kobe port facilities, known as the Port Island Terminal (westernmost large island, part of the island still being constructed) and the roughly rectangular-shaped island immediately northeast of Port Island Terminal is Rokko Island Terminal. Many large manmade islands (shipping and receiving terminals) located along the east coast of Osaka Bay form the Port of Osaka, considered to be one of the foremost international ports of Japan. A causeway bridge connects Kansai International Airport (light-colored rectangular island) with the mainland. This bridge has also been constructed on reclaimed land and can be seen near the bottom center of the image. Several river channels (dark, linear, winding features), including the wide Yodo River (note the many bridges that cross the Yodo River), can be traced through the city of Osaka. The dark landscapes are low, forested mountains.
Meatpacking District, Manhattan
History
From 1878, when the John Jacob Astor I Estate was partitioned, this property passed to William Astor, then to John Jacob Astor IV, and finally to William Vincent Astor, who held it until 1943. This building has had a complex construction history. Its present form resulted from an alteration in 1921-22 (Alt. 2409-1921) when four two- and three-story stables and wagon storage buildings were unified at two stories, fortified with interior steel girders, and converted to a garage (on both stories) with stores.
It appears that the previous buildings were: a two-story former storeldwelling (11 Little West 12' Street) altered in 1881 (Alt. 972-1881, A.B. Van Heusen, builder); a two-story stables building (17 Ninth Avenue) rebuilt in 1889 (Alt. 597-1 889, Hugh Getty, mason); a one-story market and stables building (9 Ninth Avenue) rebuilt and raised to two stories in 1905 (Alt. 1398-1905, George M. McCabe, architect), after being condemned by the Board of Health; and a three-story stables building (19 Ninth Avenue) constructed in 1908 (NB 647-1906, George M. McCabe, architect).
Commercial tenants both before and after the 1920s alteration were mostly in the fruit and produce business, including several long-term ones: Domenico Calarco, Frank Cliento & Co., Angelo Gionfrida, West Side Water Cress Co., and C. Starace & Bro. (later C. Starace & Bros., Inc. and J.J. Starace, Inc.). Domenico Calarco purchased the building from Astor in 1943 and held it until 1962. It operated as the Radio Garage and Avenue Garage until the 1940s, then as the Gansevoort Garage (Leo and Frank Calarco) and Olympia Garage.
This building was the result of a 1921-22 alteration during one of the major phases of development in the area, when transportation and market-related buildings were being constructed or significantly adapted in the district.
Ownership History (formerly lots 45 and 49; previously lots 45-49) 1878 William Astorl John Jacob Astor IV/ William Vincent Astor 1943 Domenico Calarco 1962 19-9th Avenue Corp. 1985 William Gottlieb 1998 9 Ninth Avenue LLC Commercial Tenants Partlin & Co., fruit (1889); Christian Handelmann, produce (1889); Frank T. Scheidel, produce (1889-97); Ephraim Booth, produce (1889); Michael Tremberger, Jr., fruitlproduce (1890); F.J. Larkin & Bro., fruit (1902-06); William Hirsch, produce (1902); Domenico Calarco, fruit (1906-70); Frank Cliento & Co., fruit (1906-29); Ernest Celendine, produce (1906); William Berkowitz, produce (1906); Samuel Asciutto, produce (1906); Joseph Acanford, produce (1906); Louis Tausend, produce (1906-12); White's Express Co. (1909-12); Angelo Gionfrida, fruit (1910-55); Joseph Vogel, produce (19 12); Atlantic Express Co. (1913); C[harles]. Perceval, Inc., provisions (192 1-22); Radio Garage, Inc. (1921-23); Avenue Garage, Inc. (1926-46); Coltri-Ceaser, auto reps. (1929-33); Gigoux Bros., food products (1929); Regular Fruit & Produce Co. (1929); Adler's Express Co.1 Market Hardware Co. (1929-33); Radio Coffee Pot (1929-33); West Side Water Cress Co. (1929- 59); Arthur H. & L. Nadel, produce (1929); C. Starace & Bro.1 C. Starace & Bros., Inc.1 J.J. Starace, Inc., fruit (1933-80); Chisholm Motor Service (1933); Excellent Fruit & Produce Distributors, Inc. (1933); UnitedHotel Supply, Inc. (1933); Sun Restaurant (1936-42); Joseph Buonocore, fruit (1936- 38); Salvatore Buonocore, produce (1946); Gansevoort Garage, Inc. (Leo and Frank Calarco)/ Olympia Garage, Inc. (1949-93); A. Stalano, produce (1950); J&D Auto Service1 B&C Auto & Truck Maintenance (1955-59); A&J Tantillo, produce (1959-65); Far-Best Transportation Co. (1959- 65); Brothers TruckRental Co. (1970-86); Shiff Produce, Inc. (1975-80); AlliedFanns (1980); Farm Crest Markets, Inc. (1980); Pastis, restaurant (1999-2003)
----About the district----
The Gansevoort Market Historic District - consisting of 104 buildings - is distinctive for its architectural character which reflects the area's long history of continuous, varied use as a place of dwelling, industry, and commerce, particularly as a marketplace, and its urban layout. The buildings, most dating from the 1840s through the 1940s, represent four major phases of development, and include both purpose-built structures, designed in then-fashionable styles, and those later adapted for market use. The architecture of the district tells the story of an important era in New York City's history when it became the financial center of the country and when its markets were expanding to serve the metropolitan region and beyond. Visual cohesion is provided to the streetscapes by the predominance of brick as a facade material; the one- to six-story scale; the presence of buildings designed by the same architects, a number of them prominent, including specialists in market-related structures; the existence of metal canopies originally installed for market purposes; and the Belgian block paving still visible on most streets. The street layout is shaped by the transition between the irregular pattern of northwestern Greenwich Village (as far north as Gansevoort Street) and the grid of the 1811 Commissioner's Plan. Unusually large and open intersections contribute to the area's unique quality, particularly where Ninth Avenue meets West 14'~S treet and Gansevoort Street (which was widened in l887), and provide sweeping vistas that showcase the unusual building typology and mixed-use quality of the district. Aside from Tribeca, the Gansevoort Market Historic District is the only remaining marketplace district that served the once-flourishing Hudson River commercial waterfront.
The earliest buildings in the historic district date from the period between 1840 and 1854, most built as rowhouses and town houses, several of which soon became very early working-class tenements (all eventually had stores on the ground floor). The area's early mixed use, however, is evident in the rare surviving early factory building (c. 1849-60), on a flatiron-shaped lot, for Col. Silas C. Herring, a nationally significant manufacturer of safes and locks, at 669-685 Hudson Street.
This mixed use, consisting of single-family houses, multiple dwellings, and industry was unusual for the period. The stretch of Ninth Avenue between Gansevoort and West 15' Streets, albeit altered and interrupted with later additions, offers the vista of a distinctive Manhattan streetscape featuring twenty buildings of the 1840s: the rowhouses at Nos. 3-7 (c. 1849) and Nos. 21-27 (c. 1844-46), the Herring factory, and culminating in the rare, picturesque ensemble of twelve rowhouses and town houses, Nos. 44-60 Ninth Avenue and 351-355 West 14th Street (c. 1841-46), at the wide, angled intersection with Hudson and West 14" Streets. Another business from this period was the woodworking factory of the prominent building firm of James C. Hoe & Co. (c. 1850-54) at 52-58 Gansevoort Street (later altered).
After the Civil War, the area began to flourish commercially as New York City solidified its position as the financial center of the country, and construction resumed in the district in 1870. Two major businesses located here were A.H. Wellington's Merchants' Print Works (1 874, S. W. Johnson), cotton printers at 416-418 West 14" Street (later altered); and the Italianate style Centennial Brewery (1876, John B. Snook) at 409-41 1 West 14' Street.
The bulk of the buildings in the district date from the 1880s through the 1920s and were designed in then-popular historical revival styles. Residential and commercial development, including a variety of building types, was particularly spurred in the 1880s by two major factors. The first was the creation of two nearby municipal markets: the open-air Farmers' or Gansevoort Market (1 879), for regional produce, at Gansevoort and Washington Streets (adjacent to the historic district), and the West Washington Market (1889), for meat, poultry, and dairy products, on the river side of West Street. From the 1880s until World War II, wholesale produce, fruit, groceries, dairy products, eggs, specialty foods, and liquor (until Prohibition) were among the dominant businesses within the district in response to the adjacent markets, particularly along Gansevoort, Little West 12', and Washington Streets. The first of the two-story, purpose-built market buildings in the district were erected in 1880. These vernacular and neo-Grec style structures typified the low-rise market buildings constructed in the district over the next 90 years: produce (or, later, meat) handling on the ground story, shielded by a metal canopy over the sidewalk, and offices on the second story.
Commercial construction during this period, which represents the highest percentage of the district's varied yet distinctive building stock, included not only low-rise purpose-built market buildings, but also, in a variety of period styles, stables buildings, and five- and six-story store-and-loft buildings and warehouses were constructed to house and serve these businesses. The warehouses, in particular, are among the most monumental structures in the district.
The second factor spurring development within the historic district was the 1878 partition of real estate owned by the Astor family, which had remained underdeveloped since John Jacob Astor 1's acquisition in 1819. Of the 104 buildings in the district, over one-third of them were constructed by the Astors and related family members. Astor improvements included the market buildings at 823-833 Washington Street and 32-36 Little West 12" Street (1880, Joseph M. Dunn, James Stroud); the distinguished Queen Anne style French flats building (with stores) at 440 West 14" Street (1887, James W. Cole), the block-long Queen Anne style produce market building at 859- 877 Washington Street (1887, Cole), and the handsome Romanesque Revival style stables building (1893, Thomas R. Jackson) for the New York Biscuit Co. (later Nabisco), the world's largest supplier of crackers, at 439-445 West 14" Street. A number of other prominent owners also invested in real estate here and began to develop their properties: the Goelet family constructed the unusual flatiron-shaped store-and-loft building at 53-61 Gansevoort Street (1887, Dunn), which housed E.S.
Burnham & Co., clam canners; James AlfredRoosevelt owned the warehouse at 400 West 14thS treet (1886, Dunn); and former New York Mayor Hugh J. Grant developed the neo-Romanesque style warehouses (1 899-1900, George P. Chappell) at 97-103 Horatio Street. The Astors and other owners gave several commissions to architects Joseph M. Dunn, who designed seven buildings in the district, and James W. Cole, who designed three buildings in the district. These multiple commissions in the then-fashionable neo-Grec or Queen Anne styles contribute to the district's visual cohesion.
Between 1897 and 1935, nearly the entire block bounded by Gansevoort, Horatio, Washington, and West Streets was developed with a handsome neo-Classical style ensemble in tan brick, by noted architects Lansing C. Holden, J. Graham Glover, and John B. Snook Sons, that included a power plant and nine cold storage warehouses for the Manhattan Refrigerating Co. (incorporated 1894). The company was responsible for installing the system of underground pipes that carried refrigeration to market-related structures throughout the district by about 1906. This infrastructure, along with the completion by the N.Y.C. Dept. of Docks of the nearby Gansevoort Piers (1894-1902) and Chelsea Piers (1902-10, with Warren & Wetmore), docks for the great trans- Atlantic steamships (and the busiest section of New York's port), had profound impacts on the district. The distribution of wholesale meat, poultry, and seafood, particularly for hotels, restaurants, and steamships, emerged as an important business throughout the district, resulting in new construction as well as bringing new uses to existing buildings. Some companies were subsidiaries of major national meatpackers, while other independent firms were among the nation's largest.
The underground refrigeration system, the new piers, and the emergence of new uses relating to the burgeoning hotel and steamship industry further triggered the 20th-century construction and architectural change and flexibility that has shaped the character of the Gansevoort Market Historic District. Typically, commercial redevelopments of neighborhoods in New York City involved the demolition of earlier buildings for structures housing new uses. However, one of the district's unique qualities is that earlier buildings were retained and altered to market uses. Earlier examples include the Centennial Brewery (409-41 1 West 14" Street), converted to meat, produce, and dairy use in 1901, and 21-27 Ninth Avenue, rowhouses adapted in 1923-24 as meat market buildings.
Over the years, the Astors continued their policy of high-quality architectural commissions by hiring distinguished architects known for their significant public, commercial, and residential buildings, such as the neo-Classical style offices and printing plant (1901-02, Trowbridge & Livingston) of P.F. Collier & Son, publisher of books and the nationally-known magazine Collier's, at 416-424 West 13' Street; the neo-Romanesque style liquor warehouse at 29-35 Ninth Avenue (1902-03, Boring & Tilton); and the Arts and Crafts style warehouse building (1913, LaFarge, Morris & Cullen) at 5 Little West 1 2 '~S treet.
The completion of the Holland Tunnel (1927), the elevated Miller Highway (1931), and the New York Central Railroad's elevated freight railway (1934) providedeasier access between the area and the metropolitan region and spurred another major phase of new low-rise construction and the functional conversion of existing buildings for market use in the district. New structures included the earlyInternationa1 style General Electric Co. annex (1929-30, Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.) at 414 West 14' Street, and the Moderne style John Morrell & Co. meat market building (1936-37, H. Peter Henschien) at 446-448 West 14'~S treet. The unusually wide Gansevoort Street assumed its distinctive character of low-rise market buildings with metal canopies at this time, through such new construction as the fruitlproduce market building (1938-39, Charles H. Stadler) at No. 46-50, and the Moderne style R&L Restaurant (1949), at No.69, and newly adapted structures, including No. 52-58 (formerly James C. Hoe & Co.), altered as a market building in 1937, and No. 60-68 (1880-81 tenements), reduced to a two-story market building in 1940.
By World War II, poultry- and meat- packing had consolidated as the main commercial activity within the district. Maritime commerce along the Hudson River waterfront declined by the 1960s, however, with the end of the ocean liner era and the rise of containerized shipping. Changes in the meat and poultry industries meant a lessening presence in this area. The Manhattan Refrigerating Co. closed in 1979 and its buildings were subsequently converted to apartments.
The completion of several more transportation and development projects (most located outside the historic district) in the 1930s spurred another major phase of new low-rise construction and functional conversion for market use of existing buildings within the historic district. Easier access was provided between the market area and the metropolitan region. The construction of the elevated Miller Highway (1929-3 1) necessitated the displacement of some produce and meat and poultry merchants in both the Gansevoort and West Washington Markets, including the demolition of several buildings at the latter. The Port of New York Authority built the Union Inland Terminal No. 1 (1931-32, Abbott, Merkt & Co.), a unified truck-rail terminal (modeled functionally after the Starrett-Lehigh Building), just northeast of the district and occupying the entire block at Ninth Avenue and West 15" Street.
The New York Central Railroad's elevated freight railway (193 1-34) passed through some thirty buildings on its route southward to the new St. John's Park Freight Terminal at West and Clarkson Streets. This railway also used part of the Gansevoort Market site, and additionally, the City constructed a meat processing plant on the market site (1939). The Lincoln Tunnel (1937) provided a second automotive route to New Jersey. The Ninth Avenue el, which ran through the district, was demolished (c. 1940); streetcar tracks located below the el had been taken up in 1936.
The first new purpose-built low-scale (one-story) market building in the historic district was 14-20 Little West 12" Street (1928, John B. Snook Sons), for the Wendel family and used initially by produce merchants. The P.F. Collier & Son building at 416-424 West 13" Street became a warehouse of the General Electric Co. in 1929; an early International style annex (1929-30, Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.) was constructed next door at 414 West 14" Street. Owned by Vincent Astor, this was the last of the Astor improvements within the district. 13 and 15 Little West 12' Street (1933, Martin Smith) were one-story fruit market buildings. Designed in the Moderne style were the John Morrell & Co. meat market building (1936-37, H. Peter Henschien) at 446-448 West 14th Street; the meat market building at 837-843 Washington Street (1938, David M. Oltarsh); and the fruitlproduce market building at 46-50 Gansevoort Street (1938-39, Charles H. Stadler).
Built at a time when the growing prevalence of the automobile resulted in the predominance of new market types throughout the U.S. (such as drive-in markets, chain grocery stores, and supermarkets), these buildings are rare and late examples of the older market building typology.34 Many of the buildings in the district that were architecturally adapted for market functions were properties acquired through foreclosure at the height of the Depression. Most of these buildings were functionally maximized at two stories (vacant, formerly residential, upper stories were no longer necessary): the lower story was refrigerated for produce or meat use and the upper story held offices. The unusually wide Gansevoort Street assumed its distinctive character of low-rise market buildings with metal canopies at this time, largely through such newly-adapted structures, including the vernacular style No. 52-58 (formerly James C. Hoe & Co.), altered as a fruit and produce market building in 1937 (S. Walter Katz); the neo-Grec style No. 60-68 (five 1880-81 tenements), reduced to a two-story market building in 1940 (Voorhees, Walker, Foley & Smith); and No. 7 1-73 (aka 8 17- 821 Washington Street) (three 1886-87 Queen Anne style French flats buildings), reduced to three stories in 1940 for use as a meat market building. The neo-Grec and utilitarian style 823-833 Washington Street and neo-Grec style 32-36 Little West 12" Street, 1880 two-story market buildings, were also altered in 1940-41 for meat merchants.
By World War II, poultry- and meat- packing had consolidated as the main commercial activity throughout the district. The opening of the Queens Live Poultry Terminal Market (1941) caused poultry dealers to move from the West Washington Market, replaced in part by produce merchants. The creation in 1950 of the Gansevoort Market Meat Center on the site of Gansevoort Market and the demolition of the remaining West Washington Market buildings, with the associated displacement of the businesses at both locations, hastened changes within the district. In 1959, the Gansevoort Market area was referred to in the New York Times as "the largest meat and poultry receiving market in the world. In the district, 408-412 West 13" Street (1941, Charles N. & Selig Whinston) was a new two-story market building used by hides/skins and meat businesses, while 36- 40 Gansevoort Street (aka 831-835 Greenwich Street) (1947-48, Horace Ginsbern & Assocs.), for poultry businesses, was the last new purpose-built market building in the district. The Moderne style R & L Restaurant (1949), 69 Gansevoort Street, resulted from the alteration of a three-story house.
Alterations associated with conversions to meat market uses included 809-813 Washington Street (aka 70-74 Gansevoort Street) (1940-42, Voorhees, Walker, Foley & Smith), a freight trucking depot altered in 1950; 402-404 and 406 West 13th Street (1840s rowhouses) altered in1950 and 1955 (Abraham L. Seiden); and 15 and 13 Little West 12" Street (c. 1961 and 1969 additions, bylattributed to Seiden).
Today, the Gansevoort Market Historic District is a vibrant neighborhood of remaining meatpackers, high-end retail commerce, restaurants, offices, clubs, galleries, and apartments, that retains, despite recent changes, a strong and integral sense of place as a market district, due to its distinctive streetscapes, metal canopies, notable buildings, both purpose-built and those adapted over the years for market use, and unusual street pattern with its Belgian block paving.
- From the 2003 NYCLPC Landmark Designation Report
A crowd of civilians watches as Soldiers from the 317th Maintenance Company, 391st Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, unload a cargo container of water treatment equipment at the Lagwal Dam Reservoir in Kitgum, Uganda, Oct. 5,, 2009.
U.S. Army photo and report by Spc. Jason Nolte, 21st TSC Public Affairs
KITGUM, Uganda – With Natural Fire 10 just a couple of weeks away, the set up of the life support area for troops participating in the exercise is in full swing – an area where safe drinking water is a premium and healthy living conditions are a priority.
“Hygiene issues are huge here. Right now it’s a very rustic environment. Soldiers have to ensure they practice good personal hygiene on a regular basis,” Said Maj. Ken Spicer, a specialist with the Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine – Europe.
Spc. Brandon Johnson, a water treatment specialist with the 240th Quartermaster Company, 391st Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, said the importance of clean water for hygiene is absolutely critical.
“I’m purifying shower water and latrine water for the exercise,” said Johnson. “You don’t want to get an infection from bad water, and you don’t want to get sick from bad water.”
“The prevention of waterborne diseases is an interesting issue,” Spicer said. “First we have to find a water source, which we have. The water gets purified through a reverse osmosis water purification unit, and it’s treated with chlorine. It’s disinfected with chlorine that kills the bacteria.”
From there, Spicer said the water has to be transported to a holding container. Throughout the process the water is treated to ensure it remains disinfected and maintains an acceptable chlorine level so Soldiers can use it for showering and shaving.
During the exercise the joint U.S. forces will use containerized showers and latrine units. Those units will get their water from the hard work of water treatment specialists from the 240th QM Co.
Natural Fire 10 is a training exercise which offers an opportunity for east African community partner nations and the U.S. military to work together during a humanitarian assistance mission. Working together, all parties will learn from each other to increase regional capabilities to respond to complex humanitarian emergencies.
To learn more about U.S. Army Africa visit our official website at www.usaraf.army.mil
Official Twitter Feed: www.twitter.com/usarmyafrica
Official Vimeo video channel: www.vimeo.com/usarmyafrica
A 2 años del inicio de operaciones en Lázaro Cárdenas, APM Terminals refrenda su compromiso con las necesidades del comercio exterior vía marítima, ofreciendo soluciones competitivas para la atención a la carga contenerizada, innovación tecnológica continua y equipamiento, que fortalecen su estratégica posición en el Pacífico Mexicano.
Two years after the start of operations in Lázaro Cárdenas, APM Terminals confirms its commitment to the needs of foreign trade by sea, offering competitive solutions for the attention to containerized cargo, continuous technological innovation and equipment, which strengthen its strategic position in the Pacific Mexican.
4.9.13
This 173-acre terminal has 4,780 linear feet (1,457m) of berthing space on 40 feet (12.2m) of deepwater.
The terminal handles containerized and breakbulk cargoes, imported automobiles and liquid bulk commodities such as turpentine and vegetable oil. Breakbulk cargoes include steel, lumber and paper, and a variety of frozen and chilled goods. Talleyrand is equipped with four container cranes, on-dock rail and 160,000 square feet of transit shed space capable of handling cargo in refrigerated, freezer or ambient conditions. Additionally, a 553,000-square foot warehouse stores a variety of cargoes, including rolls of fine and specialty papers, magazine papers and newsprint.
The Talleyrand terminal also offers two 50-LT capacity rubber tired gantry cranes, both of which straddle four rail spurs totaling 4,800 linear feet (1,463 m). Talleyrand's on-dock rail facilities are run by Talleyrand Terminal Railroad, Inc., which provides direct switching service for Norfolk Southern and CSX railroads. The terminal is only 25 minutes from Florida East Coast Railroad's intermodal ramp, and is conveniently located within minutes of interstates I-95 and I-10.
Photo Credit: JAXPORT, Meredith Fordham Hughes
The flag of the Hamburg-Süd Line in the stiff breeze at Norfolk Virginia.
Wikipedia says:
Hamburg Süd is a shipping line on the North-South ocean trade routes, in which was part of the Oetker Group and sold to A.P. Moller–Maersk Group's shipping division Maersk Line.
History
In 1871 Hamburg Südamerikanische Dampfschifffahrts-Gesellschaft (Hamburg - South America Steam Shipping Company or Hamburg South America Line) was established by a conglomerate of 11 Hamburg-based merchant houses.
Three steam-ships totalling 4,000 GRT provided a monthly shipping service to Brazil and Argentina.
By 1914 the company was operating over 50 ships totaling approximately 325,000 GRT.
World War I culminated in the loss of all Hamburg Süd's vessels, and the company was forced to begin again by chartering vessels.
The early 1950s saw the company embark on tramp shipping and tanker shipping, and large growth of refrigerated cargoes.
In 1955 the Dr. August Oetker company took the company over, and began rapid expansion of the liner and passenger services.
The takeover of Deutsche Levante Linie in 1956 saw the company commence its first foray into the Mediterranean.
1957 saw liner services begin between North America and Australia/New Zealand, with the Columbus New Zealand being the first container ship to ply trade-lanes in the region in 1971, pioneering containerization in the Pacific.
Roles in war
The Cap Trafalgar was a brand-new passenger liner, having been completed only on March 1, 1914 and had commenced her maiden voyage only on March 10, 1914. Germany had lightly armed the vessel with two 10.5 cm guns and 6 heavy machine guns, and had removed one of the three steam-funnels and re-coloured the vessel to disguise it as a British liner. The vessel encountered the British fully armed ex-steam liner Carmania about 700 miles east of the Brazilian coast, near the island of Trindade, at 9:30 a.m. on September 14, 1914. After a heated exchange of fire between the two ships, the Cap Trafalgar began listing to the left, then sunk bow-first.
The Cap Arcona, arguably one of the most beautiful passenger liners in its time, was converted to serve the Kriegsmarine (German Navy) as a converted transport vessel in 1940. At the end of 1944 it was then commandeered as a troopship, primarily transporting refugees and prisoners of war along the Baltic Sea. Loaded with 4,500 prisoners at Lübeck Bay, it was attacked by Royal Air Force Typhoons in an air-raid. The Cap Arcona remained capsized in Lübeck Bay until 1950 and was then taken apart by divers, over a period of years, and scrapped. The wreckage was registered and photographed in detail by Rolls Royce, who had produced the RAF's rockets, to assess their effectiveness.
Corporate takeovers
Hamburg Süd also owns Brazilian operator Aliança and Spanish operator Ybarra Sud. It has taken over many companies over the years including Ellerman, Kien Hung, South Seas Steamship, Deutsche-Nah-Ost-Linie, Royal Mail Line, Pacific Steam Navigation Company, Swedish Laser Lines, Rotterdam Zuid-America Lijn (RZAL), Havenlijn and the Inter-America services of Crowley American Transport. In the past parts of Hamburg Süd has been known as Columbus Line.
Since 2004 the services of Columbus Line are directly integrated into Hamburg-Süd. The current container fleet of dry boxes has a distinctive red color with a huge flag and white HAMBURG SÜD logo on the side.
The refrigerated boxes are white with the flag and navy blue lettering.
Humanitarian aid
Hamburg Süd supports international aid organisations with in-house shipping facilities. In the shortest possible time, relief supplies and technical or medical equipment are transported where needed, typically after natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions.
Hamburg Süd maintains a long-term relationship to SOS Children's Villages, supporting their projects in different countries. Hamburg Süd also supports various initiatives in the fields of education and culture, including the United Buddy Bears exhibitions.
Spcs. Caleb Powell and John Williams, 317th Maintenance Company, 391st Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, unload a cargo container of water treatment equipment at the Lagwal Dam Reservoir in Kitgum, Uganda, Oct. 5, 2009.
U.S. Army photo and report by Spc. Jason Nolte, 21st TSC Public Affairs
KITGUM, Uganda – With Natural Fire 10 just a couple of weeks away, the set up of the life support area for troops participating in the exercise is in full swing – an area where safe drinking water is a premium and healthy living conditions are a priority.
“Hygiene issues are huge here. Right now it’s a very rustic environment. Soldiers have to ensure they practice good personal hygiene on a regular basis,” Said Maj. Ken Spicer, a specialist with the Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine – Europe.
Spc. Brandon Johnson, a water treatment specialist with the 240th Quartermaster Company, 391st Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, said the importance of clean water for hygiene is absolutely critical.
“I’m purifying shower water and latrine water for the exercise,” said Johnson. “You don’t want to get an infection from bad water, and you don’t want to get sick from bad water.”
“The prevention of waterborne diseases is an interesting issue,” Spicer said. “First we have to find a water source, which we have. The water gets purified through a reverse osmosis water purification unit, and it’s treated with chlorine. It’s disinfected with chlorine that kills the bacteria.”
From there, Spicer said the water has to be transported to a holding container. Throughout the process the water is treated to ensure it remains disinfected and maintains an acceptable chlorine level so Soldiers can use it for showering and shaving.
During the exercise the joint U.S. forces will use containerized showers and latrine units. Those units will get their water from the hard work of water treatment specialists from the 240th QM Co.
Natural Fire 10 is a training exercise which offers an opportunity for east African community partner nations and the U.S. military to work together during a humanitarian assistance mission. Working together, all parties will learn from each other to increase regional capabilities to respond to complex humanitarian emergencies.
To learn more about U.S. Army Africa visit our official website at www.usaraf.army.mil
Official Twitter Feed: www.twitter.com/usarmyafrica
Official Vimeo video channel: www.vimeo.com/usarmyafrica
Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick Kennedy views two newly completed Containerized Biocontainment System units at Dobbins Air Reserve Base in Marietta, Georgia, on August 11, 2015. The units will be instrumental in expanding and expediting medevac capabilities for healthcare workers on the frontlines fighting Ebola. [State Department photo/ Public Domain]
7.27.12
JAXPORT's staff is comprised of 150 employees, whom manage and market the port and plan for its improvement. JAXPORT's staff work in a variety of areas, including terminal operations and security; cruise operations; planning and properties; construction and engineering; finance, administration, procurement, IT, government and external affairs, corporate communications and trade development and marketing.
Talleyrand Marine Terminal:
This 173-acre terminal has 4,780 linear feet (1,457m) of berthing space on 40 feet (12.2m) of deepwater.
The terminal handles containerized and breakbulk cargoes, imported automobiles and liquid bulk commodities such as turpentine and vegetable oil. Breakbulk cargoes include steel, lumber and paper, and a variety of frozen and chilled goods. Talleyrand is equipped with four container cranes, on-dock rail and 160,000 square feet of transit shed space capable of handling cargo in refrigerated, freezer or ambient conditions. Additionally, a 553,000-square foot warehouse stores a variety of cargoes, including rolls of fine and specialty papers, magazine papers and newsprint.
The Talleyrand terminal also offers two 50-LT capacity rubber tired gantry cranes, both of which straddle four rail spurs totaling 4,800 linear feet (1,463 m). Talleyrand's on-dock rail facilities are run by Talleyrand Terminal Railroad, Inc., which provides direct switching service for Norfolk Southern and CSX railroads. The terminal is only 25 minutes from Florida East Coast Railroad's intermodal ramp, and is conveniently located within minutes of interstates I-95 and I-10.
Photo credit: JAXPORT, Meredith Fordham Hughes
Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick Kennedy delivers remarks at the unveiling of the completion of two Containerized Biocontainment System units at Dobbins Air Reserve Base in Marietta, Georgia, on August 11, 2015. The units will be instrumental in expanding and expediting medevac capabilities for healthcare workers on the frontlines fighting Ebola. [State Department photo/ Public Domain]
Thames Barrier is a large flood control structure on the River Thames, constructed between 1974 and 1982 at Woolwich Reach, and first used defensively in 1983.[1] It is the world's second largest movable flood barrier (the largest is the Maeslantkering in The Netherlands).
Located downstream of central London, the barrier's purpose is to prevent London from being flooded by an exceptionally high tide moving up from the sea, often exacerbated by a storm surge. It only needs to be raised for the duration of the high tide; at ebb tide it can be lowered to release upstream water that backs up behind it. On the northern bank it lies in the area of Silvertown in the London Borough of Newham. On the southern bank it lies in the New Charlton area of Charlton in the London Borough of Greenwich.
Built across a 572 yard wide stretch of the river, the barrier divides the river into four 200 feet and two 34 yd navigable spans and four smaller non-navigable channels between nine concrete piers and two abutments. The flood gates across the openings are circular segments in cross section, and they operate by rotating, raised to allow "underspill" to allow operators to control upstream levels and a complete 180 degree rotation for maintenance. All the gates are hollow and made of steel up to 1½ inches thick. The gates fill with water when submerged and empty as they emerge from the river. The four large central gates are 220 feet long, 35 feet high (above local ground level) and weigh 3,500 tonnes; the outer two gates are 100 feet. Additionally, four radial gates by the riverbanks, also 100 feet long, can be lowered. These gate openings, unlike the main six, are non-navigable.
Before 1990, the number of barrier closures was one to two per year on average. Since 1990, the number of barrier closures has increased to an average of about four per year. In 2003 the Barrier was closed on 14 consecutive tides. The barrier was closed twice on 9 November 2007 after a storm surge in the North Sea which was compared to the one in 1953.
The concept of the rotating gates was devised by Charles Draper. The barrier was designed by Rendel, Palmer and Tritton for the Greater London Council and tested at HR Wallingford Ltd. The site at Woolwich was chosen because of the relative straightness of the banks, and because the underlying river chalk was strong enough to support the barrier. Work began at the barrier site in 1974 and construction, which had been undertaken by a Costain/Hollandsche Beton Maatschappij/Tarmac Construction consortium,[2] was largely complete by 1982. In addition to the barrier itself the flood defences for 11 miles down river were raised and strengthened. The barrier was officially opened on 8 May 1984 by Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II. Total construction cost was around £534 m (£1.3 billion at 2001 prices) with an additional £100 m for river defences. The barrier was originally designed to protect London against a flood level with a return period of 100 years in the year 2070 after which the protection would decrease but be within acceptable limits. This defence level included long term changes in sea and land levels as understood at that time (c. 1970). Since then sea level rise due to global warming has been identified. Based on current estimates[3] the barrier will be able to cope with projected sea level rises until around 2060–2070 and is expected to serve its full term. Since 1982 (up to 2007) the barrier has been raised over 100[4] times; further, it is raised every month for testing. The barrier was originally commissioned by the Greater London Council under the guidance of Ray Horner. After the 1986 abolition of the GLC it was operated successively by Thames Water Authority and then the National Rivers Authority until April 1996 when it passed to the Environment Agency.
In 2005, a suggestion was made public that it might become necessary to supersede the Thames Barrier with a much more ambitious 16 km (10 mi) long barrier across the Thames Estuary from Sheerness in Kent to Southend in Essex.[5]
London is quite vulnerable to flooding. A storm surge generated by low pressure in the Atlantic Ocean sometimes tracks eastwards past the north of Scotland and may then be driven into the shallow waters of the North Sea. The storm surge is funnelled down the North Sea which narrows towards the English Channel and the Thames Estuary. If the storm surge coincides with a spring tide then dangerously high water levels can occur in the Thames Estuary. This situation combined with downstream flows in the Thames provides the triggers for Flood defence operations.
According to Gilbert & Horner on 7 December 1663 Samuel Pepys recorded in his diary "There was last night the greatest tide that ever was remembered in England to have been in this river all Whitehall having been drowned". In 1236 the river is reported as overflowing "and in the great Palace of Westminster men did row with wherries in the midst of the hall". (Gilbert & Horner - 1984). Fourteen people died in the 1928 Thames flood, and after 307 people died in the UK in the North Sea Flood of 1953 the issue gained new prominence.
The threat has increased over time due to the slow but continuous rise in high water level over the centuries (20 cm / 100 years) and the slow "tilting" of Britain (up in the north and down in the south) caused by post-glacial rebound.
Early proposals for a flood control system were stymied by the need for a large opening in the barrier to allow for vessels from London Docks to pass through. When containerization came in and a new port was opened at Tilbury, a smaller barrier became feasible with each of the four main navigation spans being the same width as the opening of Tower Bridge.
An incident which had the potential to be catastrophic for London occurred on 27 October 1997. The dredger, MV Sand Kite, sailing in thick fog, collided with one of the Thames Barrier's piers. As the ship started to sink she dumped her 3,300 tonne load of aggregate, finally sinking by the bow on top of one of the barrier's gates where she lay for several days. Initially the gate could not be closed as it was covered in a thick layer of gravel. A longer term problem was the premature loss of paint on the flat side of the gate caused by abrasion. One estimate of the cost of flooding damage, had it occurred, was around £13 billion.[6] The vessel was refloated in mid-November 1997.
The barrier was closed twice on 9 November 2007 after a storm surge in the North Sea which was compared to the one in 1953.[7] The main danger of flooding from the surge was on the coast above the Thames Barrier, where evacuations took place, but the winds abated a little and, at the Thames Barrier, the 9 November 2007 storm surge did not completely coincide with high tide.[8]
A Thames Barrier flood defence closure is triggered when a combination of high tides forecast in the North Sea and high river flows at the tidal limit at Teddington weir indicate that water levels would exceed 4.87 m in central London. Forecast sea levels at the mouth of the Thames Estuary are generated by Met Office computers and also by models run on the Thames Barrier's own forecasting and telemetry computer systems. About 9 hours before the high tide reaches the barrier a flood defence closure begins with messages to stop river traffic, close subsidiary gates and alert other river users. As well as the Thames Barrier, the smaller gates along the Thames Tideway include Barking Barrier, King George V Lock gate, Dartford Barrier and gates at Tilbury Docks and Canvey Island. Once river navigation has been stopped and all subsidiary gates closed, then the Thames Barrier itself can be closed. The smaller gates are closed first, then the main navigable spans in succession. The gates remain closed until the tide downstream of the barrier falls to the same level as the water level upstream.
After periods of heavy rain west of London, floodwater can also flow down the Thames upstream from London. Because the river is tidal from Teddington weir all the way through London, this is only a problem at high tide, which prevents the floodwater from escaping out to sea. From Teddington the river is opening out into its estuary, and at low tide it can take much greater flow rates the further one goes downstream. In periods when the river is in flood upstream, if the gates are closed shortly after low tide, a huge empty volume is created behind the barrier which can act as a reservoir to hold the floodwater coming over Teddington weir. Most river floods will not fill this volume in the few hours of the high tide cycle during which the barrier needs to be closed. If the barrier was not there, the high tide would fill up this volume instead, and the floodwater could then spill over the river banks in London.
Close-up, cross-section view of CROCIDOLITE-based sprayed "Limpet" asbestos fireproofing sample, by Keasbey & Mattison Company (K&M) of Ambler, Pennsylvania, US.
The vintage containerized sample consists of approx. 65% crocidolite (also known as "blue asbestos") amphibole asbestos; explaining why the material appears blue-grey in color.
Imagine the airborne fiber concentrations of crocidolite on construction worksites when this material was being sprayed at high-velocity and in large quantities.
SF Bay RR, 21 June 2018
The San Francisco Bay RR operates on the southeast side of San Francisco on and near the port. It uses two Alco S2 switchers that were built for the State Belt RR, later the San Francisco Belt RR, the line that served the piers of the Port of San Francisco for many years.
As shipping companies moved to containerization, the Port of Oakland became the big northern California container terminal and most of the piers of the Port of San Francisco were abandoned or converted to uses other than marine freight, so the SF Belt RR found itself out of a job. After 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake damaged the Embarcadero Freeway, which had run over the SF Belt for most of its length, the freeway was removed, opening up San Francisco's waterfront and much of the Belt's trackage as converted for use by the Muni F line, which runs historic streetcars to Fishermen's Wharf, and the Muni lines that now server the Caltrain station.
Meanwhile, Pier 96, near Hunter's Point was converted to a container facility and the railroad's operations survived there. The line was renamed the San Francisco Bay RR and continued to use Alco S2s 23 and 25 to switch its customers.
Today, the railroad's main business is transloading dirty dirt from constructions and clean up sites in the Bay Area from trucks to railcars. It is owned by Waste Solutions Group, which also owns a fleet of hopper cars. The SF Bay and UP interchange on an as needed basis, with UP's South City job running into the SF Bay's yard on Cargo Way with empties and taking away loads.
A couple of railfans, Ryan and Ben, work for the railroad and Ryan invited me to come by for a visit. I had stopped by one afternoon a couple of years ago, and lucked out to see an S2 running around the yard a bit, but the railrroad usually goes on duty betweeen 4 and 5 am, switches cars for a few hours and then is done for the day. So, a visit to the SF Bay from Sacramento entailed a night in a hotel. It took a few tries for me to get time off from work scheduled on the same day the railroad was running.
Eventually, it all lined up and my alarm went off at 0315 at a hotel in Daly City, just south of the SF city limit.
I was at the yard by 4 and met Ben, who went out and started Alco 23. 25 is out of service with a bad bearing on the radiator fan drive shaft. Ryan explained that the SF Belt had done a jerry rigged repair of the shaft at some point and it was never documented, so nobody knew about the bearing until it failed. As a new low emission unit will be delivered in the next few months, there is no reason to repair 25. 25 will be put on display somewhere, perhaps near the Ferry Building, while 23 will be held as backup for the new unit.
But for now, an S2 built in 1944 is doing the job it was built to do. If you think about it, that is as though the Virginia and Truckee had still been using the Reno and Genoa during WW2.
Shorty after I got there, Ben went out and fired up the 23. It has a block heater, so it started easily with a puff of white smoke. He did an inspection of the engine, including checking the journal boxes. We then went back into the office and waited for Ryan, brakeman Johnny, and engineer Nick to arrive. The crew plotted their switching moves for the day. Ryan, who is yard operations manager, suggested that I get some blue hour photos from the ground as empties were switched and then we rode 23 while they switched loads.
Each car has dirt from one particular construction site and the dirt from sites cannot be mixed as different sites will have different contamination. UP ships it to a dump site in Nevada, where it is processed. Ryan explained that sometimes they can use dividers in a car to separate dirt from different projects if there is not that much.
Right now transshipping dirty dirt is the SF Bay's only business, but there a couple of other industries are interested in bringing new business. The line that crosses the Illinois St. bridge has been out of service for a couple of years as there currently no customers north of Islais Creek.
We rode the S2 for a while after the day brightened, then got down and Ryan drove me around in a company car to get some more angles as they switched. He then had other work to do and I shot the end of 23's work day as well as 25, some spare Alco parts and another project of Waste Solutions, goats that are leased out for natural weed control. Ryan said that since Waste Solutions got more cars, they can't use their goats as much for weed control in the yard as most of the yard tracks are occupied.
The crew called it a day for switching about 0800 and then would be doing other work in the yard for the rest of their work day.
All of these photos were taken with permission after signing a release and while wearing required PPE.
I want to than Ryan, Ben, Johnny and Nick for their hospitality. I had a great time.
Close-up view detail of crocidolite fiber bundle in fibrous sample of sprayed "Limpet" asbestos by former Keasbey & Mattison of Ambler, Pennsylvania, US. Partial detail image of vintage containerized sample of 65% blue asbestos amphibole fireproofing material.
Mineral Water Plant
The demand of water is increasing year after year. The per capita consumption of water has increased and given the limited resource of fresh water it is difficult for the countries to make available its population the fresh water. Keeping this situation in mind many industries have set up mineral water plant in order to obtain fresh drinking water.
Purification
The first step is water purification. Water obtained from the external source is allowed to pass through the purification unit and then stored in a stainless tank. passed through the purification plant and stored in a stainless steel tank. After purification water is taken to the bottling section. Bottling is done as a continuous operation. Purification is followed by Rinsing, Filling and Capping. The unit automatically fills, rinses, and screws the cap on it. Finally mineral water is labeled, packed and marketed.
Process of Mineral Water Plant
What is the method for mineral water processing?
Processing mineral water from underground water resource or other resources goes as follows. Motor pump is used to draw water from theses sources or source which is transported to the source water reservoir. Coagulation chemical is added to remove the settled colloidal and suspended materials contaminated in the water. Water is then sterilized using oxidants like chlorine or other chemicals to kill harmful bacteria and microorganism.
Filtration is the next step. Using filtration system like Quartz Sand Filtration System gives good purifying results. After purification water contains very little amount of suspended solids.
For further purification, water is absorbed on the activated carbon which absorbs most pollutants dissolved in water. This also helps in the removal of the odors and helps in improving the flavor of the water.
After being purified water softening is done by passing water through the tank containing sodium ion. The tank consist of resin pellets and the softening is done by ion exchange method Water still contains small micro pollutants that are removed by passing them through tanks that are meant for this purpose.
Apart from this method reverse osmosis process is also used for obtaining pure water. In this process water is purified by using semi permeable membrane. Purified water is sterilized or disinfected and then packed for market
Supply Chain Of Imported Mineral Water External Source Mineral Water Interface Structure:
R.O.Tack Water Technology
Water Treatment sector is undergoing a rapid change on account of the entry barrier in the global market. In competitive and quality environment international level recognition has become need for every company for the longer-term growth. Every component of the quality system in the plant that meets the National and International standards has become necessity for today. Therefore every step of the project delivery from conceptualization detailed engineering to documentation have to be prepared to comply with the stringent regulatory requirements.
The foundation stone of R.O. Tack Water Technology was laid in the year of 2001 in Karachi by a veteran Mr. Ayaz Attari and Mr. Azhar Frooqi is the main Director of the company who guided the company to touch the height of success. Due to the continuous efforts of the our director towards excellence R.O.Tack Water Technology has become an unrivaled manufacturer & supplier of RO Water Systems; especially Reverse Osmosis Systems. Today our Reverse Osmosis Filtration Systems are considered as the best in the market. Some of the attributes that play significant role in our uniqueness are as follows and we provide complete range of solution like packaged system turn key projects and also we offer you technical services.
Multi Grade Filter
Dual Media Filter
Micro filtration
Ultra Filtration
Nano Filtration
Reverse Osmosis
Water Softening System
Demineralization Plant
Mixed Bed Plant
Sea Water Desalination Plant
Waste Water Recovery Plant
Water Treatment Chemicals
Sewage treatment plant
Mineral Water Treatment Plant
Package Drinking Water Treatment Plant
Swimming Pool Filtration Systems
DM Plant
Effluent Minimization
Sterilization by Ultraviolet Systems
Ozonation.
Domestic RO system
Water filtration plant for residential projects
Chemicals,
Turn Key Projects
Complete Detail Design, Engineering, Procurement and construction provided at single finger only for complete End to End solution with high quality deliverables.
Our Deliverables.
Detail Proposal with Costing.
Basic Design and Engineering Packages.
Complete Engineering with all related standard norms.
Complete procurement.
Construction
Commissioning.
Operation and maintenance.
Tel: +92 (21) 5436228
Fax: +92 (21) 2621927
Cell: +92 (300) 2824299
Email:www.rotackwater@yahoo.ca
Website: www.rotackwater.com
Close-up view of crocidolite fiber bundle in fibrous sample of sprayed Limpet asbestos by Keasbey & Mattison of Ambler, Pennsylvania, US. Partial detail image of vintage containerized sample of 65% blue asbestos fireproofing material.
7.27.12
JAXPORT's staff is comprised of 150 employees, whom manage and market the port and plan for its improvement. JAXPORT's staff work in a variety of areas, including terminal operations and security; cruise operations; planning and properties; construction and engineering; finance, administration, procurement, IT, government and external affairs, corporate communications and trade development and marketing.
Talleyrand Marine Terminal:
This 173-acre terminal has 4,780 linear feet (1,457m) of berthing space on 40 feet (12.2m) of deepwater.
The terminal handles containerized and breakbulk cargoes, imported automobiles and liquid bulk commodities such as turpentine and vegetable oil. Breakbulk cargoes include steel, lumber and paper, and a variety of frozen and chilled goods. Talleyrand is equipped with four container cranes, on-dock rail and 160,000 square feet of transit shed space capable of handling cargo in refrigerated, freezer or ambient conditions. Additionally, a 553,000-square foot warehouse stores a variety of cargoes, including rolls of fine and specialty papers, magazine papers and newsprint.
The Talleyrand terminal also offers two 50-LT capacity rubber tired gantry cranes, both of which straddle four rail spurs totaling 4,800 linear feet (1,463 m). Talleyrand's on-dock rail facilities are run by Talleyrand Terminal Railroad, Inc., which provides direct switching service for Norfolk Southern and CSX railroads. The terminal is only 25 minutes from Florida East Coast Railroad's intermodal ramp, and is conveniently located within minutes of interstates I-95 and I-10.
Photo credit: JAXPORT, Meredith Fordham Hughes
Once a rather busy pier in the 1960s / 70s when containerization was not yet fully developed, there were boats and barges shipping in bulk cargo and then truck loads of the shipment on pier were distributed to other destinations thru Ma Tau Kok Road. Even in the 80s the pier was still in operation off-loading cattle from barges for heading to the abattoir.
A large part of the loading dock adjoining the pier was then redeveloped to a government workshop that belongs to the Electrical & Mechanical Services Department (EMSD), yet the seawall remained much the same except that bollards were no longer seen.
Top photo ( Actually taken on March 2011 ) -- there is a classic ramp built against the sea wall, it was meant for manual carrying of boxes and crates ashore from boats. When was it built ?
Meatpacking District, Gansevoort Market Historic District, Manhattan
From 1878, when the John Jacob Astor I Estate was partitioned, this property passed to William Astor, then to John Jacob Astor IV, and finally to William Vincent Astor, who held it until 1943. This building has had a complex construction history. Its present form resulted from an alteration in 1921-22 (Alt. 2409-1921) when four two- and three-story stables and wagon storage buildings were unified at two stories, fortified with interior steel girders, and converted to a garage (on both stories) with stores.
It appears that the previous buildings were: a two-story former store dwelling (11 Little West 12' Street) altered in 1881 (Alt. 972-1881, A.B. Van Heusen, builder); a two-story stables building (17 Ninth Avenue) rebuilt in 1889 (Alt. 597-1 889, Hugh Getty, mason); a one-story market and stables building (9 Ninth Avenue) rebuilt and raised to two stories in 1905 (Alt. 1398-1905, George M. McCabe, architect), after being condemned by the Board of Health; and a three-story stables building (19 Ninth Avenue) constructed in 1908 (NB 647-1906, George M. McCabe, architect). Commercial tenants both before and after the 1920s alteration were mostly in the fruit and produce business, including several long-term ones: Domenico Calarco, Frank Cliento & Co., Angelo Gionfrida, West Side Water Cress Co., and C. Starace & Bro. (later C. Starace & Bros., Inc. and J.J. Starace, Inc.). Domenico Calarco purchased the building from Astor in 1943 and held it until 1962. It operated as the Radio Garage and Avenue Garage until the 1940s, then as the Gansevoort Garage (Leo and Frank Calarco) and Olympia Garage.
This building was the result of a 1921-22 alteration during one of the major phases of development in the area, when transportation and market-related buildings were being constructed or significantly adapted in the district.
----About the district----
The Gansevoort Market Historic District - consisting of 104 buildings - is distinctive for its architectural character which reflects the area's long history of continuous, varied use as a place of dwelling, industry, and commerce, particularly as a marketplace, and its urban layout. The buildings, most dating from the 1840s through the 1940s, represent four major phases of development, and include both purpose-built structures, designed in then-fashionable styles, and those later adapted for market use.
The architecture of the district tells the story of an important era in New York City's history when it became the financial center of the country and when its markets were expanding to serve the metropolitan region and beyond. Visual cohesion is provided to the streetscapes by the predominance of brick as a facade material; the one- to six-story scale; the presence of buildings designed by the same architects, a number of them prominent, including specialists in market-related structures; the existence of metal canopies originally installed for market purposes; and the Belgian block paving still visible on most streets.
The street layout is shaped by the transition between the irregular pattern of northwestern Greenwich Village (as far north as Gansevoort Street) and the grid of the 1811 Commissioner's Plan. Unusually large and open intersections contribute to the area's unique quality, particularly where Ninth Avenue meets West 14'~S treet and Gansevoort Street (which was widened in l887), and provide sweeping vistas that showcase the unusual building typology and mixed-use quality of the district. Aside from Tribeca, the Gansevoort Market Historic District is the only remaining marketplace district that served the once-flourishing Hudson River commercial waterfront.
The earliest buildings in the historic district date from the period between 1840 and 1854, most built as rowhouses and town houses, several of which soon became very early working-class tenements (all eventually had stores on the ground floor). The area's early mixed use, however, is evident in the rare surviving early factory building (c. 1849-60), on a flatiron-shaped lot, for Col. Silas C. Herring, a nationally significant manufacturer of safes and locks, at 669-685 Hudson Street.
This mixed use, consisting of single-family houses, multiple dwellings, and industry was unusual for the period. The stretch of Ninth Avenue between Gansevoort and West 15' Streets, albeit altered and interrupted with later additions, offers the vista of a distinctive Manhattan streetscape featuring twenty buildings of the 1840s: the rowhouses at Nos. 3-7 (c. 1849) and Nos. 21-27 (c. 1844-46), the Herring factory, and culminating in the rare, picturesque ensemble of twelve rowhouses and town houses, Nos. 44-60 Ninth Avenue and 351-355 West 14th Street (c. 1841-46), at the wide, angled intersection with Hudson and West 14" Streets. Another business from this period was the woodworking factory of the prominent building firm of James C. Hoe & Co. (c. 1850-54) at 52-58 Gansevoort Street (later altered).
After the Civil War, the area began to flourish commercially as New York City solidified its position as the financial center of the country, and construction resumed in the district in 1870. Two major businesses located here were A.H. Wellington's Merchants' Print Works (1 874, S. W. Johnson), cotton printers at 416-418 West 14" Street (later altered); and the Italianate style Centennial Brewery (1876, John B. Snook) at 409-41 1 West 14' Street.
The bulk of the buildings in the district date from the 1880s through the 1920s and were designed in then-popular historical revival styles. Residential and commercial development, including a variety of building types, was particularly spurred in the 1880s by two major factors. The first was the creation of two nearby municipal markets: the open-air Farmers' or Gansevoort Market (1 879), for regional produce, at Gansevoort and Washington Streets (adjacent to the historic district), and the West Washington Market (1889), for meat, poultry, and dairy products, on the river side of West Street. From the 1880s until World War II, wholesale produce, fruit, groceries, dairy products, eggs, specialty foods, and liquor (until Prohibition) were among the dominant businesses within the district in response to the adjacent markets, particularly along Gansevoort, Little West 12', and Washington Streets. The first of the two-story, purpose-built market buildings in the district were erected in 1880.
These vernacular and neo-Grec style structures typified the low-rise market buildings constructed in the district over the next 90 years: produce (or, later, meat) handling on the ground story, shielded by a metal canopy over the sidewalk, and offices on the second story.
Commercial construction during this period, which represents the highest percentage of the district's varied yet distinctive building stock, included not only low-rise purpose-built market buildings, but also, in a variety of period styles, stables buildings, and five- and six-story store-and-loft buildings and warehouses were constructed to house and serve these businesses. The warehouses, in particular, are among the most monumental structures in the district.
The second factor spurring development within the historic district was the 1878 partition of real estate owned by the Astor family, which had remained underdeveloped since John Jacob Astor 1's acquisition in 1819. Of the 104 buildings in the district, over one-third of them were constructed by the Astors and related family members. Astor improvements included the market buildings at 823-833 Washington Street and 32-36 Little West 12" Street (1880, Joseph M. Dunn, James Stroud); the distinguished Queen Anne style French flats building (with stores) at 440 West 14" Street (1887, James W. Cole), the block-long Queen Anne style produce market building at 859- 877 Washington Street (1887, Cole), and the handsome Romanesque Revival style stables building (1893, Thomas R. Jackson) for the New York Biscuit Co. (later Nabisco), the world's largest supplier of crackers, at 439-445 West 14" Street.
A number of other prominent owners also invested in real estate here and began to develop their properties: the Goelet family constructed the unusual flatiron-shaped store-and-loft building at 53-61 Gansevoort Street (1887, Dunn), which housed E.S.
Burnham & Co., clam canners; James AlfredRoosevelt owned the warehouse at 400 West 14thS treet (1886, Dunn); and former New York Mayor Hugh J. Grant developed the neo-Romanesque style warehouses (1 899-1900, George P. Chappell) at 97-103 Horatio Street. The Astors and other owners gave several commissions to architects Joseph M. Dunn, who designed seven buildings in the district, and James W. Cole, who designed three buildings in the district. These multiple commissions in the then-fashionable neo-Grec or Queen Anne styles contribute to the district's visual cohesion.
Between 1897 and 1935, nearly the entire block bounded by Gansevoort, Horatio, Washington, and West Streets was developed with a handsome neo-Classical style ensemble in tan brick, by noted architects Lansing C. Holden, J. Graham Glover, and John B. Snook Sons, that included a power plant and nine cold storage warehouses for the Manhattan Refrigerating Co. (incorporated 1894).
The company was responsible for installing the system of underground pipes that carried refrigeration to market-related structures throughout the district by about 1906. This infrastructure, along with the completion by the N.Y.C. Dept. of Docks of the nearby Gansevoort Piers (1894-1902) and Chelsea Piers (1902-10, with Warren & Wetmore), docks for the great trans- Atlantic steamships (and the busiest section of New York's port), had profound impacts on the district. The distribution of wholesale meat, poultry, and seafood, particularly for hotels, restaurants, and steamships, emerged as an important business throughout the district, resulting in new construction as well as bringing new uses to existing buildings. Some companies were subsidiaries of major national meatpackers, while other independent firms were among the nation's largest.
The underground refrigeration system, the new piers, and the emergence of new uses relating to the burgeoning hotel and steamship industry further triggered the 20th-century construction and architectural change and flexibility that has shaped the character of the Gansevoort Market Historic District. Typically, commercial redevelopments of neighborhoods in New York City involved the demolition of earlier buildings for structures housing new uses. However, one of the district's unique qualities is that earlier buildings were retained and altered to market uses. Earlier examples include the Centennial Brewery (409-41 1 West 14" Street), converted to meat, produce, and dairy use in 1901, and 21-27 Ninth Avenue, rowhouses adapted in 1923-24 as meat market buildings.
Over the years, the Astors continued their policy of high-quality architectural commissions by hiring distinguished architects known for their significant public, commercial, and residential buildings, such as the neo-Classical style offices and printing plant (1901-02, Trowbridge & Livingston) of P.F. Collier & Son, publisher of books and the nationally-known magazine Collier's, at 416-424 West 13' Street; the neo-Romanesque style liquor warehouse at 29-35 Ninth Avenue (1902-03, Boring & Tilton); and the Arts and Crafts style warehouse building (1913, LaFarge, Morris & Cullen) at 5 Little West 1 2 '~S treet.
The completion of the Holland Tunnel (1927), the elevated Miller Highway (1931), and the New York Central Railroad's elevated freight railway (1934) providedeasier access between the area and the metropolitan region and spurred another major phase of new low-rise construction and the functional conversion of existing buildings for market use in the district. New structures included the earlyInternationa1 style General Electric Co. annex (1929-30, Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.) at 414 West 14' Street, and the Moderne style John Morrell & Co. meat market building (1936-37, H. Peter Henschien) at 446-448 West 14'~S treet.
The unusually wide Gansevoort Street assumed its distinctive character of low-rise market buildings with metal canopies at this time, through such new construction as the fruitlproduce market building (1938-39, Charles H. Stadler) at No. 46-50, and the Moderne style R&L Restaurant (1949), at No.69, and newly adapted structures, including No. 52-58 (formerly James C. Hoe & Co.), altered as a market building in 1937, and No. 60-68 (1880-81 tenements), reduced to a two-story market building in 1940.
By World War II, poultry- and meat- packing had consolidated as the main commercial activity within the district. Maritime commerce along the Hudson River waterfront declined by the 1960s, however, with the end of the ocean liner era and the rise of containerized shipping. Changes in the meat and poultry industries meant a lessening presence in this area. The Manhattan Refrigerating Co. closed in 1979 and its buildings were subsequently converted to apartments.
The completion of several more transportation and development projects (most located outside the historic district) in the 1930s spurred another major phase of new low-rise construction and functional conversion for market use of existing buildings within the historic district. Easier access was provided between the market area and the metropolitan region. The construction of the elevated Miller Highway (1929-3 1) necessitated the displacement of some produce and meat and poultry merchants in both the Gansevoort and West Washington Markets, including the demolition of several buildings at the latter. The Port of New York Authority built the Union Inland Terminal No. 1 (1931-32, Abbott, Merkt & Co.), a unified truck-rail terminal (modeled functionally after the Starrett-Lehigh Building), just northeast of the district and occupying the entire block at Ninth Avenue and West 15" Street.
The New York Central Railroad's elevated freight railway (193 1-34) passed through some thirty buildings on its route southward to the new St. John's Park Freight Terminal at West and Clarkson Streets. This railway also used part of the Gansevoort Market site, and additionally, the City constructed a meat processing plant on the market site (1939). The Lincoln Tunnel (1937) provided a second automotive route to New Jersey. The Ninth Avenue el, which ran through the district, was demolished (c. 1940); streetcar tracks located below the el had been taken up in 1936.
The first new purpose-built low-scale (one-story) market building in the historic district was 14-20 Little West 12" Street (1928, John B. Snook Sons), for the Wendel family and used initially by produce merchants. The P.F. Collier & Son building at 416-424 West 13" Street became a warehouse of the General Electric Co. in 1929; an early International style annex (1929-30, Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.) was constructed next door at 414 West 14" Street. Owned by Vincent Astor, this was the last of the Astor improvements within the district. 13 and 15 Little West 12' Street (1933, Martin Smith) were one-story fruit market buildings. Designed in the Moderne style were the John Morrell & Co. meat market building (1936-37, H. Peter Henschien) at 446-448 West 14th Street; the meat market building at 837-843 Washington Street (1938, David M. Oltarsh); and the fruitlproduce market building at 46-50 Gansevoort Street (1938-39, Charles H. Stadler).
Built at a time when the growing prevalence of the automobile resulted in the predominance of new market types throughout the U.S. (such as drive-in markets, chain grocery stores, and supermarkets), these buildings are rare and late examples of the older market building typology.34 Many of the buildings in the district that were architecturally adapted for market functions were properties acquired through foreclosure at the height of the Depression. Most of these buildings were functionally maximized at two stories (vacant, formerly residential, upper stories were no longer necessary): the lower story was refrigerated for produce or meat use and the upper story held offices. The unusually wide Gansevoort Street assumed its distinctive character of low-rise market buildings with metal canopies at this time, largely through such newly-adapted structures, including the vernacular style No. 52-58 (formerly James C. Hoe & Co.), altered as a fruit and produce market building in 1937 (S. Walter Katz); the neo-Grec style No. 60-68 (five 1880-81 tenements), reduced to a two-story market building in 1940 (Voorhees, Walker, Foley & Smith); and No. 7 1-73 (aka 8 17- 821 Washington Street) (three 1886-87 Queen Anne style French flats buildings), reduced to three stories in 1940 for use as a meat market building. The neo-Grec and utilitarian style 823-833 Washington Street and neo-Grec style 32-36 Little West 12" Street, 1880 two-story market buildings, were also altered in 1940-41 for meat merchants.
By World War II, poultry- and meat- packing had consolidated as the main commercial activity throughout the district. The opening of the Queens Live Poultry Terminal Market (1941) caused poultry dealers to move from the West Washington Market, replaced in part by produce merchants. The creation in 1950 of the Gansevoort Market Meat Center on the site of Gansevoort Market and the demolition of the remaining West Washington Market buildings, with the associated displacement of the businesses at both locations, hastened changes within the district. In 1959, the Gansevoort Market area was referred to in the New York Times as "the largest meat and poultry receiving market in the world. In the district, 408-412 West 13" Street (1941, Charles N. & Selig Whinston) was a new two-story market building used by hides/skins and meat businesses, while 36- 40 Gansevoort Street (aka 831-835 Greenwich Street) (1947-48, Horace Ginsbern & Assocs.), for poultry businesses, was the last new purpose-built market building in the district. The Moderne style R & L Restaurant (1949), 69 Gansevoort Street, resulted from the alteration of a three-story house.
Alterations associated with conversions to meat market uses included 809-813 Washington Street (aka 70-74 Gansevoort Street) (1940-42, Voorhees, Walker, Foley & Smith), a freight trucking depot altered in 1950; 402-404 and 406 West 13th Street (1840s rowhouses) altered in1950 and 1955 (Abraham L. Seiden); and 15 and 13 Little West 12" Street (c. 1961 and 1969 additions, bylattributed to Seiden).
Today, the Gansevoort Market Historic District is a vibrant neighborhood of remaining meatpackers, high-end retail commerce, restaurants, offices, clubs, galleries, and apartments, that retains, despite recent changes, a strong and integral sense of place as a market district, due to its distinctive streetscapes, metal canopies, notable buildings, both purpose-built and those adapted over the years for market use, and unusual street pattern with its Belgian block paving.
- From the 2003 NYCLPC Landmark Designation Report
Meatpacking District, Gansevoort Market Historic District, Manhattan, from the High Line Park
From 1819 to 1979, this property was owned by John Jacob Astor I and his descendants, transferred to his grandson William Astor in 1878 after partition of the Astor Estate, to the Trustees for Helen Rebecca Roosevelt and James Roosevelt Roosevelt, Jr., his granddaughter and grandson, after William Astor's death in 1892, and to Helen RebeccaRoosevelt Robinson and James Roosevelt Roosevelt, Jr., when they came of age, and in 1941 (lot 60) and in 1963 (lot 27) to Helen's four children, Douglas Robinson, Helen Douglas Robinson Hinckley (later Cutting), Elizabeth Mary Douglas Robinson de Sibour, and Alida Douglas Robinson Walker (later Sage).
In 1887, this five-story, long (on two lots) market building was built to the design of architect James W. Cole. At the same time, two other buildings designed by Cole were under construction for the Astors: 440 West 14' Street (across the street) and 817- 821 Washington Street [see]. Produce and provisions merchants were the immediate tenants of this structure (some remaining for decades), including Pape & Deyol W.C. Deyo & Bro., Henry E. Schwitters/& Son, and Joseph B. Kirk, produce; Christian H. Koster/& Son, and Patrick Ford & Son, butter and eggs; and Lauricella & Pittorinol Landini & Pittorino, fruit. By the late 1920s, meatpackers were the predominant tenants in the building, some of the longer-term of whom were Scanlan Bros., Inc., Long Island Beef Co., Dorato & Cerutti 1 Allied Farms, City Provision Co., Adolf Kusy & Co., Samuel Bender & Sons, State Provision Co.1 Zucker & Friend Walpole Bros., Zeger, Inc., A. & M. Bugnon, and Republic Meat Co. Two furniture-related businesses were Ruby Lamp Mfg. Co.1 Brighter Lighting Co.1 Lighting Distributors, Inc., and Valley Upholstery Co.1 Valley Furniture Shops, Inc. The biker bar Hogs & Heifers has been located here since the early 1990s. The building was purchased in 2000 for over $10 million by Starwood Urban Retail MM, Inc., Washington- and Connecticut-based investors, for redevelopment, including offices and high-end retail.
This Queen Anne style building, which contains significant portions of its historic fabric, contributes to the historically-mixed architecture and varied uses - including market-related functions - of the Gansevoort Market Historic District. Constructed in 1887, during one of the major phases of development of the district, when buildings were constructed for produce-related businesses and other market uses, the building further contributes to the visual cohesion of the district through its prominence on two corners and long Washington Street blockfront, its three brick and stone facades, cast-iron storefronts, metal canopies, and the fact that it is one of three buildings in the district designed by architect James W. Cole.
----About the district----
The Gansevoort Market Historic District - consisting of 104 buildings - is distinctive for its architectural character which reflects the area's long history of continuous, varied use as a place of dwelling, industry, and commerce, particularly as a marketplace, and its urban layout. The buildings, most dating from the 1840s through the 1940s, represent four major phases of development, and include both purpose-built structures, designed in then-fashionable styles, and those later adapted for market use.
The architecture of the district tells the story of an important era in New York City's history when it became the financial center of the country and when its markets were expanding to serve the metropolitan region and beyond. Visual cohesion is provided to the streetscapes by the predominance of brick as a facade material; the one- to six-story scale; the presence of buildings designed by the same architects, a number of them prominent, including specialists in market-related structures; the existence of metal canopies originally installed for market purposes; and the Belgian block paving still visible on most streets.
The street layout is shaped by the transition between the irregular pattern of northwestern Greenwich Village (as far north as Gansevoort Street) and the grid of the 1811 Commissioner's Plan. Unusually large and open intersections contribute to the area's unique quality, particularly where Ninth Avenue meets West 14'~S treet and Gansevoort Street (which was widened in l887), and provide sweeping vistas that showcase the unusual building typology and mixed-use quality of the district. Aside from Tribeca, the Gansevoort Market Historic District is the only remaining marketplace district that served the once-flourishing Hudson River commercial waterfront.
The earliest buildings in the historic district date from the period between 1840 and 1854, most built as rowhouses and town houses, several of which soon became very early working-class tenements (all eventually had stores on the ground floor). The area's early mixed use, however, is evident in the rare surviving early factory building (c. 1849-60), on a flatiron-shaped lot, for Col. Silas C. Herring, a nationally significant manufacturer of safes and locks, at 669-685 Hudson Street.
This mixed use, consisting of single-family houses, multiple dwellings, and industry was unusual for the period. The stretch of Ninth Avenue between Gansevoort and West 15' Streets, albeit altered and interrupted with later additions, offers the vista of a distinctive Manhattan streetscape featuring twenty buildings of the 1840s: the rowhouses at Nos. 3-7 (c. 1849) and Nos. 21-27 (c. 1844-46), the Herring factory, and culminating in the rare, picturesque ensemble of twelve rowhouses and town houses, Nos. 44-60 Ninth Avenue and 351-355 West 14th Street (c. 1841-46), at the wide, angled intersection with Hudson and West 14" Streets. Another business from this period was the woodworking factory of the prominent building firm of James C. Hoe & Co. (c. 1850-54) at 52-58 Gansevoort Street (later altered).
After the Civil War, the area began to flourish commercially as New York City solidified its position as the financial center of the country, and construction resumed in the district in 1870. Two major businesses located here were A.H. Wellington's Merchants' Print Works (1 874, S. W. Johnson), cotton printers at 416-418 West 14" Street (later altered); and the Italianate style Centennial Brewery (1876, John B. Snook) at 409-41 1 West 14' Street.
The bulk of the buildings in the district date from the 1880s through the 1920s and were designed in then-popular historical revival styles. Residential and commercial development, including a variety of building types, was particularly spurred in the 1880s by two major factors. The first was the creation of two nearby municipal markets: the open-air Farmers' or Gansevoort Market (1 879), for regional produce, at Gansevoort and Washington Streets (adjacent to the historic district), and the West Washington Market (1889), for meat, poultry, and dairy products, on the river side of West Street. From the 1880s until World War II, wholesale produce, fruit, groceries, dairy products, eggs, specialty foods, and liquor (until Prohibition) were among the dominant businesses within the district in response to the adjacent markets, particularly along Gansevoort, Little West 12', and Washington Streets. The first of the two-story, purpose-built market buildings in the district were erected in 1880.
These vernacular and neo-Grec style structures typified the low-rise market buildings constructed in the district over the next 90 years: produce (or, later, meat) handling on the ground story, shielded by a metal canopy over the sidewalk, and offices on the second story.
Commercial construction during this period, which represents the highest percentage of the district's varied yet distinctive building stock, included not only low-rise purpose-built market buildings, but also, in a variety of period styles, stables buildings, and five- and six-story store-and-loft buildings and warehouses were constructed to house and serve these businesses. The warehouses, in particular, are among the most monumental structures in the district.
The second factor spurring development within the historic district was the 1878 partition of real estate owned by the Astor family, which had remained underdeveloped since John Jacob Astor 1's acquisition in 1819. Of the 104 buildings in the district, over one-third of them were constructed by the Astors and related family members. Astor improvements included the market buildings at 823-833 Washington Street and 32-36 Little West 12" Street (1880, Joseph M. Dunn, James Stroud); the distinguished Queen Anne style French flats building (with stores) at 440 West 14" Street (1887, James W. Cole), the block-long Queen Anne style produce market building at 859- 877 Washington Street (1887, Cole), and the handsome Romanesque Revival style stables building (1893, Thomas R. Jackson) for the New York Biscuit Co. (later Nabisco), the world's largest supplier of crackers, at 439-445 West 14" Street.
A number of other prominent owners also invested in real estate here and began to develop their properties: the Goelet family constructed the unusual flatiron-shaped store-and-loft building at 53-61 Gansevoort Street (1887, Dunn), which housed E.S.
Burnham & Co., clam canners; James AlfredRoosevelt owned the warehouse at 400 West 14thS treet (1886, Dunn); and former New York Mayor Hugh J. Grant developed the neo-Romanesque style warehouses (1 899-1900, George P. Chappell) at 97-103 Horatio Street. The Astors and other owners gave several commissions to architects Joseph M. Dunn, who designed seven buildings in the district, and James W. Cole, who designed three buildings in the district. These multiple commissions in the then-fashionable neo-Grec or Queen Anne styles contribute to the district's visual cohesion.
Between 1897 and 1935, nearly the entire block bounded by Gansevoort, Horatio, Washington, and West Streets was developed with a handsome neo-Classical style ensemble in tan brick, by noted architects Lansing C. Holden, J. Graham Glover, and John B. Snook Sons, that included a power plant and nine cold storage warehouses for the Manhattan Refrigerating Co. (incorporated 1894).
The company was responsible for installing the system of underground pipes that carried refrigeration to market-related structures throughout the district by about 1906. This infrastructure, along with the completion by the N.Y.C. Dept. of Docks of the nearby Gansevoort Piers (1894-1902) and Chelsea Piers (1902-10, with Warren & Wetmore), docks for the great trans- Atlantic steamships (and the busiest section of New York's port), had profound impacts on the district. The distribution of wholesale meat, poultry, and seafood, particularly for hotels, restaurants, and steamships, emerged as an important business throughout the district, resulting in new construction as well as bringing new uses to existing buildings. Some companies were subsidiaries of major national meatpackers, while other independent firms were among the nation's largest.
The underground refrigeration system, the new piers, and the emergence of new uses relating to the burgeoning hotel and steamship industry further triggered the 20th-century construction and architectural change and flexibility that has shaped the character of the Gansevoort Market Historic District. Typically, commercial redevelopments of neighborhoods in New York City involved the demolition of earlier buildings for structures housing new uses. However, one of the district's unique qualities is that earlier buildings were retained and altered to market uses. Earlier examples include the Centennial Brewery (409-41 1 West 14" Street), converted to meat, produce, and dairy use in 1901, and 21-27 Ninth Avenue, rowhouses adapted in 1923-24 as meat market buildings.
Over the years, the Astors continued their policy of high-quality architectural commissions by hiring distinguished architects known for their significant public, commercial, and residential buildings, such as the neo-Classical style offices and printing plant (1901-02, Trowbridge & Livingston) of P.F. Collier & Son, publisher of books and the nationally-known magazine Collier's, at 416-424 West 13' Street; the neo-Romanesque style liquor warehouse at 29-35 Ninth Avenue (1902-03, Boring & Tilton); and the Arts and Crafts style warehouse building (1913, LaFarge, Morris & Cullen) at 5 Little West 1 2 '~S treet.
The completion of the Holland Tunnel (1927), the elevated Miller Highway (1931), and the New York Central Railroad's elevated freight railway (1934) providedeasier access between the area and the metropolitan region and spurred another major phase of new low-rise construction and the functional conversion of existing buildings for market use in the district. New structures included the earlyInternationa1 style General Electric Co. annex (1929-30, Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.) at 414 West 14' Street, and the Moderne style John Morrell & Co. meat market building (1936-37, H. Peter Henschien) at 446-448 West 14'~S treet.
The unusually wide Gansevoort Street assumed its distinctive character of low-rise market buildings with metal canopies at this time, through such new construction as the fruitlproduce market building (1938-39, Charles H. Stadler) at No. 46-50, and the Moderne style R&L Restaurant (1949), at No.69, and newly adapted structures, including No. 52-58 (formerly James C. Hoe & Co.), altered as a market building in 1937, and No. 60-68 (1880-81 tenements), reduced to a two-story market building in 1940.
By World War II, poultry- and meat- packing had consolidated as the main commercial activity within the district. Maritime commerce along the Hudson River waterfront declined by the 1960s, however, with the end of the ocean liner era and the rise of containerized shipping. Changes in the meat and poultry industries meant a lessening presence in this area. The Manhattan Refrigerating Co. closed in 1979 and its buildings were subsequently converted to apartments.
The completion of several more transportation and development projects (most located outside the historic district) in the 1930s spurred another major phase of new low-rise construction and functional conversion for market use of existing buildings within the historic district. Easier access was provided between the market area and the metropolitan region. The construction of the elevated Miller Highway (1929-3 1) necessitated the displacement of some produce and meat and poultry merchants in both the Gansevoort and West Washington Markets, including the demolition of several buildings at the latter. The Port of New York Authority built the Union Inland Terminal No. 1 (1931-32, Abbott, Merkt & Co.), a unified truck-rail terminal (modeled functionally after the Starrett-Lehigh Building), just northeast of the district and occupying the entire block at Ninth Avenue and West 15" Street.
The New York Central Railroad's elevated freight railway (193 1-34) passed through some thirty buildings on its route southward to the new St. John's Park Freight Terminal at West and Clarkson Streets. This railway also used part of the Gansevoort Market site, and additionally, the City constructed a meat processing plant on the market site (1939). The Lincoln Tunnel (1937) provided a second automotive route to New Jersey. The Ninth Avenue el, which ran through the district, was demolished (c. 1940); streetcar tracks located below the el had been taken up in 1936.
The first new purpose-built low-scale (one-story) market building in the historic district was 14-20 Little West 12" Street (1928, John B. Snook Sons), for the Wendel family and used initially by produce merchants. The P.F. Collier & Son building at 416-424 West 13" Street became a warehouse of the General Electric Co. in 1929; an early International style annex (1929-30, Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.) was constructed next door at 414 West 14" Street. Owned by Vincent Astor, this was the last of the Astor improvements within the district. 13 and 15 Little West 12' Street (1933, Martin Smith) were one-story fruit market buildings. Designed in the Moderne style were the John Morrell & Co. meat market building (1936-37, H. Peter Henschien) at 446-448 West 14th Street; the meat market building at 837-843 Washington Street (1938, David M. Oltarsh); and the fruitlproduce market building at 46-50 Gansevoort Street (1938-39, Charles H. Stadler).
Built at a time when the growing prevalence of the automobile resulted in the predominance of new market types throughout the U.S. (such as drive-in markets, chain grocery stores, and supermarkets), these buildings are rare and late examples of the older market building typology.34 Many of the buildings in the district that were architecturally adapted for market functions were properties acquired through foreclosure at the height of the Depression. Most of these buildings were functionally maximized at two stories (vacant, formerly residential, upper stories were no longer necessary): the lower story was refrigerated for produce or meat use and the upper story held offices. The unusually wide Gansevoort Street assumed its distinctive character of low-rise market buildings with metal canopies at this time, largely through such newly-adapted structures, including the vernacular style No. 52-58 (formerly James C. Hoe & Co.), altered as a fruit and produce market building in 1937 (S. Walter Katz); the neo-Grec style No. 60-68 (five 1880-81 tenements), reduced to a two-story market building in 1940 (Voorhees, Walker, Foley & Smith); and No. 7 1-73 (aka 8 17- 821 Washington Street) (three 1886-87 Queen Anne style French flats buildings), reduced to three stories in 1940 for use as a meat market building. The neo-Grec and utilitarian style 823-833 Washington Street and neo-Grec style 32-36 Little West 12" Street, 1880 two-story market buildings, were also altered in 1940-41 for meat merchants.
By World War II, poultry- and meat- packing had consolidated as the main commercial activity throughout the district. The opening of the Queens Live Poultry Terminal Market (1941) caused poultry dealers to move from the West Washington Market, replaced in part by produce merchants. The creation in 1950 of the Gansevoort Market Meat Center on the site of Gansevoort Market and the demolition of the remaining West Washington Market buildings, with the associated displacement of the businesses at both locations, hastened changes within the district. In 1959, the Gansevoort Market area was referred to in the New York Times as "the largest meat and poultry receiving market in the world. In the district, 408-412 West 13" Street (1941, Charles N. & Selig Whinston) was a new two-story market building used by hides/skins and meat businesses, while 36- 40 Gansevoort Street (aka 831-835 Greenwich Street) (1947-48, Horace Ginsbern & Assocs.), for poultry businesses, was the last new purpose-built market building in the district. The Moderne style R & L Restaurant (1949), 69 Gansevoort Street, resulted from the alteration of a three-story house.
Alterations associated with conversions to meat market uses included 809-813 Washington Street (aka 70-74 Gansevoort Street) (1940-42, Voorhees, Walker, Foley & Smith), a freight trucking depot altered in 1950; 402-404 and 406 West 13th Street (1840s rowhouses) altered in1950 and 1955 (Abraham L. Seiden); and 15 and 13 Little West 12" Street (c. 1961 and 1969 additions, bylattributed to Seiden).
Today, the Gansevoort Market Historic District is a vibrant neighborhood of remaining meatpackers, high-end retail commerce, restaurants, offices, clubs, galleries, and apartments, that retains, despite recent changes, a strong and integral sense of place as a market district, due to its distinctive streetscapes, metal canopies, notable buildings, both purpose-built and those adapted over the years for market use, and unusual street pattern with its Belgian block paving.
- From the 2003 NYCLPC Landmark Designation Report
7.27.12
JAXPORT's staff is comprised of 150 employees, whom manage and market the port and plan for its improvement. JAXPORT's staff work in a variety of areas, including terminal operations and security; cruise operations; planning and properties; construction and engineering; finance, administration, procurement, IT, government and external affairs, corporate communications and trade development and marketing.
Talleyrand Marine Terminal:
This 173-acre terminal has 4,780 linear feet (1,457m) of berthing space on 40 feet (12.2m) of deepwater.
The terminal handles containerized and breakbulk cargoes, imported automobiles and liquid bulk commodities such as turpentine and vegetable oil. Breakbulk cargoes include steel, lumber and paper, and a variety of frozen and chilled goods. Talleyrand is equipped with four container cranes, on-dock rail and 160,000 square feet of transit shed space capable of handling cargo in refrigerated, freezer or ambient conditions. Additionally, a 553,000-square foot warehouse stores a variety of cargoes, including rolls of fine and specialty papers, magazine papers and newsprint.
The Talleyrand terminal also offers two 50-LT capacity rubber tired gantry cranes, both of which straddle four rail spurs totaling 4,800 linear feet (1,463 m). Talleyrand's on-dock rail facilities are run by Talleyrand Terminal Railroad, Inc., which provides direct switching service for Norfolk Southern and CSX railroads. The terminal is only 25 minutes from Florida East Coast Railroad's intermodal ramp, and is conveniently located within minutes of interstates I-95 and I-10.
Photo credit: JAXPORT, Meredith Fordham Hughes
Chicago area railroad junctions are listed on this website: www.dhke.com/CRJ/index.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BNSF_Railway
The BNSF Railway (AAR reporting marks BNSF) headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas, is one of the four remaining transcontinental railroads and one of the largest railroad networks in North America. Only the Union Pacific Railroad is larger in size. With globalization, the transcontinental railroads are a key component in the containerization of trade from the Pacific Rim. The BNSF Railway moves more intermodal freight traffic than any other rail system in the world.
It was formed December 31, 1996, as the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway when the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway was merged into the Burlington Northern Railroad. In 1999 the BNSF Railway and the Canadian National Railway announced their intention to merge and form a new corporation entitled the North American Railways to be headquartered in Montreal, Canada. The United States' Surface Transportation Board (STB) placed a 15-month moratorium on all rail mergers, which ended this merger. On January 24, 2005, the railroad's name was officially changed to BNSF Railway.[1]
The BNSF Railway is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, the holding company formed by the September 22, 1995 merger of Burlington Northern, Incorporated and the Santa Fe Pacific Corporation. According to corporate press releases, the BNSF Railway is among the top transporters of intermodal freight in North America. It moves more grain than any other American railroad. It also hauls enough coal to generate roughly 10% of the electricity produced in the United States. The company's northern route completes the high-speed link from the western to eastern United States.
This was the route of the Great Northern Railway's Silk Extras in the 1920s. They had priority over all other trains, stopping only for refueling and crew changes. These trains transported silk to the east from ships arriving in the Port of Seattle from Japan.
Clark 512-221-112 straddle carrier (1968) at the Maritiem Museum in Rotterdam, Netherlands.
In May of 1966, the Fairland of the SeaLand shipping company arrived in Rotterdam as the first container ship to call at a European port.
While the efficiency of containerised transport quickly became apparent, using the full potential of the container required not only the development of new handling equipment but also new ways for ships to be built and ports to be redisigned. The latter meant that the rows of warehouses to store break bulk cargo were increasingly replaced with the large open spaces of container terminals. Moreover, the container not only changed the geographical, but also the social structure of many port cities as it dramatically reduced the need for dockworkers.
One of the means developed to improve the efficiency of containerisation was the straddle carrier, which can both transport and stack containers. This particular straddle carrier was first used at the Europe Container Terminus, Rotterdam's first container terminal. It has a height of 7.67 metres and is powered by a 136 kW DAF diesel engine.
017 Solar cold room storage with solar panel and sandwich panel:
Our innovation, FOCUSUN 20ft and 40ft solar container cold room is a “plug and play” modular, solar-powered walk-in cold room, for 24/7 off-grid storage and preservation of perishable foods. It adequately addresses the problem of post- harvest losses in fruits, vegetables and other perishable food.
The solar powered walk-in cold room is made of 120mm insulating cold room panels to retain cold. Energy from solar panels mounted on the roof-top of the cold room are stored in high capacity batteries, these batteries feeds an inverter which in turn feeds the refrigerating unit.
Product Name
Solar-powered container cold room in 20ft or 40ft
Material stainless steel
Color Whilte & Blue
Capacity 1T to 20T
Panel Prefabricated Panel
Interior temperature -25℃ to 5℃
Applicarion area Sea food/fish/meat/fresh fruits/vegetables
Core material of panel Polyurethane
Compressor Copleand
Core density 40~42kg/m3
Condition It can use everywhere where is enough sun
Panel thickness 100mm, 120mm, 150mm
Control system Full automatic control, easy to operation and management
Material of panels surface Stainless steel
Refrigerant R404a environment friendly refrigerant