Sponsored images from 
View allAll Photos Tagged Scanner
DIY 4x6 scanner camera. Xenar 180mm lens + yellow filter.
Tried to throw the focus on the walkway and went too far.
Got the best atmosphere.
I put a withered eustoma on a bad Agfa scanner, but it worked. For me it has an old fashion and original look.
Thank you Jacqueline for the lighten tip.
From thedailylumenbox.blog Kentmere 400 shot with Canon IVSb2 Barnack style rangefinder and Canon/Serenar 50mm f/1.8 lens with Canon Auto UP VII.Developing was in Artemisianol for 15 minutes at 86° F.
Camera: Cosina Voigtlander Bessa R3M
Lens: KMZ Jupiter 3 50mm f1.5
Film: Fuji Neopan 100 (Legacy Pro)
Developer: Xtol
Scanner: Epson V600
Photoshop: Curves, Healing Brush (spotting)
Cropping: None
And here's the edited version. I think the effect is called HDR Scape, but I'm not entirely sure. Either way, I think it's a cool effect.
This particular old-style Wal-Mart hand scanner was seen last weekend at one of the Southaven Sam's Club self-checkouts. Evidently the Sam's scanner was either MIA or malfunctioning, so this old one was its substitute for the time being. I will say, it had its fair share of glitches - maybe the whole terminal is messed up.
(c) 2015 Retail Retell
These places are public so these photos are too, but just as I tell where they came from, I'd appreciate if you'd say who :)
Sir Godfrey Hounsfield invented the computer tomograph (CT). He conceived the idea in 1967.
Working for EMI (yes, that's the music label), he constructed the EMI scanner Mark 1 in 1971.
Initially, the scanner was constructed to perform brain scans only. The first scan was performed on a 41 year old lady who was shown to have a cystic tumor in the frontal lobe.
40 years ago, in 1979, Godfrey Hounsfield was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine, together with Alan M. Cormack. His name is eternally preserved in the density scale for CT imaging, which is measured in Hounsfield units (HU) and scaled between air (-1000 HU) and water (0 HU)
This EMI scanner is on display in the Science Museum in London.
Since I got my own scanner for film, I never bother doing scans at the labs, but I recently had a few rolls developed at Costco, where I always develop my negative films, and I asked them to scan the pictures because I didn't had time to do it.
When I checked the images on the screen, I thought the pictures weren't that good and I blamed the camera, so I decided to scan some of the same pictures my self to see what happens.
The pictures coming from my scanner, the Epson V600 were much better, the colors were more natural, the image sharper, and surprisingly with more details.
It's funny, because the V600 cost about $250 and the industrial Noritsu costs about $15,000. Noritsu and Fuji industrial scanners are the most common scanners in any photo lab.