View allAll Photos Tagged Rodinal
Shot on an Olympus Trip 35
Glass by Zuiko, 40mm
Film by Kodak, Trix400
Developer, R09 ONE SHOT Rodinal (dead!)
Epson V700
Lightroom
"Rodinal, it lasts forever!"
You've all heard that right? I wish it was true but not all Rodinals are made equal it seems. My bottle of R09 ONE SHOT (made in Germany) didn't quite last one year after opening. It had about 200ml left of the 500.
I developed a roll of Trix today on my Jobo for 5'50 (7m minus 15% for the agitation) and it came out almost clear, no lettering.
I was absolutely gutted I lost that roll, it had a couple of really good moments on it. I was upset much more than I expected.
Re-check, shot a roll of TMAX400 and re-dev by hand this time. Same result. Checked my thermometers, three times and they were fine.
Still didn't believe it, shot another roll, Delta 100. DDX dev on the Jobo 10 mins (12 - 15%). Came out just fine.
Conclusion, Rod is dead.
As for the picture above, that's all my scanner could recover from the super underdeveloped film. It's a look, a lomo look.. I suppose.
Two legends combine to produce excellent results! Rodinal and APX 25 are made for each other, bringing out the best of the film stock. With sharpness, a bit of uptick in visible grain (but pleasing) and a nice boost in contrast given the flat light. While it certainly is a winning combination, it surprisingly isn't my favourite.
You can read the full review online:
www.alexluyckx.com/blog/index.php/2022/07/08/classic-film...
Minolta Maxxum 9 - Minolta Maxxum AF 24mm 1:2.8 - Agfa APX 25 @ ASA-25
Adox Rodinal (1+50) 9:30 @ 20C
Scanner: Nikon Coolscan V ED + Nikon Scan 4
Editor: Adobe Photoshop CC
Fed 2, Fed 50mm f/3.5 collapsible, Fomapan 100 at box speed in Rodinal 1+49 nine minutes at 20C
Be'er Sheva
Nikon FE2, Soligor 35mm f/2.8, Rollei Superpan 200, Rodinal
www.jazzycamel.photography/Nikon-FE2-Rollei-Superpan-200/...
When I was child I used to dream about driving these huge loaders. Did it when I was about twenty. Well it was not like a dream come true, so I went back to school and got a Bachelor of Media Arts. And again I´m thinking I would like to just drive a loader. Digging gravel...we´ll see.
But hey, modified my Graflex for swing movement, loaded with Ilford panf + and shoot. Then sinked it to rodinal for about 40 min. and got myself this loader.
Fed 2, Fed 50mm f/3.5 collapsible, Fomapan 100 at box speed in Rodinal 1+49 nine minutes at 20C
Negev Brigade Memorial, Be'er Sheva
Roll 20141128-01: Kodak Portra 400 Extended ISO: Hybrid Process - Rodinal & Tetenal C41: Nikon FE2: Vidalia High School vs. Greater Atlanta Christian:
Note: After experimenting a bit with stand processing B&W film in Rodinal and being very happy with the results using Tri-X at ISO 3200 I thought there may be a way to partially process C41 film to improve the look of the dark areas of underexposed Portra. I asked the question in the APUG forums. One of the members, Athiril a member here too, determined that a 10 minute stand in 1:100 Rodinal would be sufficient to do what I wanted and conducted some of his own testing, the results of which looked much better than a push or straight processing in C41 only. This roll of film was processed using that method: Rodinal at 1:100 for 10 minutes then processed normally in Tetenal C41 chemistry. The 10 minute Rodinal process was at room temperature 72F with an initial 15 second agitation followed by a gentle swirl at 1.5 minutes and at 3 minutes. The rinse was at 102F and was the first pre-heat rinse step required for the Tetenal kit. This is the first roll I’ve process using this method and I am very happy with the results. The dark areas of the scan look much better than a 2 stop + underexposure with just normal or push processing.