View allAll Photos Tagged Privacy
The problem that always comes up is privacy. It isn’t actually the technology that’s difficult, it’s how you can do some of these things and maintain people’s privacy. People are, understandably, not always too happy about participating in this sort of thing if their email/IM traffic gets analysed. So, instead I looked at IBM’s internal blogs (which are much more public to begin with) and drew the same networks from there, based on who is commenting or referencing each other. I managed to produce the visualisations using a mixture of IBM products (DB2, Intelligent Miner Modelling and Intelligent Miner Visualization) and some custom hacked code… by me!
eightbar.co.uk/2005/10/04/ibm-blog-social-network-visuali...
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
An old toilet with a large -let loose- screen in front of it, separating it from the rest of the room.
Seeking a quiet, even private, word while standing at a bank of public phones was never easier. One shot each day in August with SMC P-K 55mm f2.0 (@ f4).
L to R: Reps Mike McClellan and Diane Russell, Jeff Northrop, Chief technology officer of the International Association of Privacy Professionals, Maine ACLU pres John Paterson and exec director Shenna Bellows
This cat had his intimate moment on a branch of a tree. And then I came with my camera and started walking around him looking for the best angle xD What an awful person, huh?
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
Seton Hall Law School's Legislative Journal and the Institute for Privacy Protection hosted a symposium entitled, "Protecting Child Privacy Beyond the Information Age" on November 15, 2019.
Seton Hall Law School's Legislative Journal and the Institute for Privacy Protection hosted a symposium entitled, "Protecting Child Privacy Beyond the Information Age" on November 15, 2019.
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
Ricchetti Alice
UFF.COM.ITALIA
mail to a.ricchetti@corghi.com <
*+39 0522 639292
*+39 0522 639166
Legge sulla Privacy: D.Lgs. 196.2003
Qualora il messaggio fosse pervenuto per errore, preghiamo di cancellarlo immediatamente senza visionarne il contenuto e, se possibile, darcene gentilmente notizia. Avvertenza: la presente casella e-mail ed i messaggi da essa derivanti, sono di esclusivo utilizzo aziendale/lavorativo e mai personale.Risposte al presente messaggio: si avvisa il destinatario che eventuali sue risposte, potranno essere lette dall'intera azienda/ufficio/reparto di appartenenza del mittente. Informativa Privacy: ai sensi dell'art. 13 D.lgs. 196/2003, informiamo il destinatario che i suoi dati sono inseriti in archivi elettronici e trattati sia con modalità informatiche che cartacee dagli incaricati del settore amministrativo e commerciale. I dati non saranno in nessun caso comunicati o diffusi e verranno utilizzati solo per dar corso ai rapporti già in essere ed adempimenti connessi. Ai sensi degli artt. 7-8-9 del medesimo D.lgs. 196/2003 a cui si rimanda per completezza, informiamo inoltre che in qualsiasi momento e del tutto gratuitamente, potrà essere richiesta la modifica, il blocco o la cancellazione dei dati e sarà possibile opporsi a qualsiasi loro utilizzo, inviando un'e-mail o fax al Titolare del trattamento. Nota: l'informativa di sintesi, è integrata da ulteriore informativa articolata ed estesa, fornita oralmente o consegnata direttamente all'interessato
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.