View allAll Photos Tagged Privacy
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
"Speculative Privacy: Practical and impractical things you can do to your phone." A lecture workshop performance I did at Internationales Sommerfestival:
#Datapolitics @ Kampnagel Hamburg, August 2016
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
I understand privacy.
But this is getting annoying if you can't even visit the site of a store that's abroad.
I think we are really overdoing this.
What do you think?
Because the heart beats under a covering of hair, of fur, feathers, or wings, it is, for that reason, to be of no account? ~Jean Paul Richter
This is my neighbor's fence. It only covers the area of their patio because our house sits a little above them so without the fence we can look down into their patio. Happy Friday all and have a good weekend!
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.
When it comes to privacy and accountability, people always demand the former for themselves and the latter for everyone else. -- David Brin (The Transparent Society) www.davidbrin.com
Toronto, April 4, 2018 - The so-called right to be forgotten is coming to Canada. Earlier this year, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner released a draft policy claiming the right for individuals to remove certain search engine results already exists within current privacy laws. Should Canadians welcome a version of this European law? Or are the trade-offs for Charter-protected access to information too great? At this half-day summit, privacy experts explored the intersection of reputation and freedom of expression,and the implications for Canada.
In partnership with CIPPIC, with thanks to sponsor Google and in-kind supporters CISION and CPAC.